Upload
amaranta-nova
View
37
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Summary Judgment– Adickes & Celotex. What general issue is raised by both Arnstein & Dyer ?. Assuming P must respond to D’s MSJ:. What does P have to do to defeat D’s motion for summary judgment? How does P meet P’s burden of production?. What does Adickes tell us about that issue?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Summary Judgment– Adickes &
Celotex
What general issue is raised
by both Arnstein &
Dyer?
Assuming P must respond to D’s MSJ:
• What does P have to do to defeat D’s motion for summary judgment?
• How does P meet P’s burden of production?
What does Adickes tell us
about that issue?
Nothing
Then what is the issue in
Adickes?
What is the issue in Adickes?
• What does the D have to do to force P to respond to a motion for summary judgment?
• What does D have to show to force P to show P’s hand?
Plaintiff’s Case
D’s SJ Motion
What other case deals with the same issue?
Simplified (2 Element) Version of Adickes?
• Element #1: Officer violated P’s rights; and
• Element #2: Either• Officer conspired with
manager;• Officer conspired with
waitress.
Under Adickes, what must D do in its MSJ
to force P to respond?
Under Celotex, what must D do in its MSJ
to force P to respond?
According to Brennan’s opinion,
what must D do in its MSJ to force P to
respond?