Upload
marilynn-maxwell
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Thickness/Phase Effect In SFS Spectra( 3 SF beam theoretical model) The phase and intensity of the SF signal arising from thin cellulose films on reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness. reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness. a) water/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cm -1 (r+) IR=2878cm -1 (r+) Dominant Periodicity=268nm Minor Periodicities=296nm, 2857nm b) water/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2966cm -1 (r-) IR=2966cm -1 (r-) c) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cm -1 (r+) IR=2878cm -1 (r+) d) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2966cm -1 (r-) IR=2966cm -1 (r-) Dominant Periodicity=267nm Minor Periodicities=294nm, 2857nm Dominant Periodicity=238nm Minor Periodicities=248nm, 6024nm Dominant Periodicity=237nm Minor Periodicities=247nm, 6024nm
Citation preview
Sum Frequency Generation in a Co-Sum Frequency Generation in a Co-Propagating Beam Geometry from Propagating Beam Geometry from
Thin FilmsThin Films
Lei LiLei LiPhD Candidate, Department of Physics and AstronomyPhD Candidate, Department of Physics and Astronomy
& The Forest Bioproducts Research Institute, The University of Maine& The Forest Bioproducts Research Institute, The University of Maine
Sum Frequency Spectroscopy (SFS) is a surface specific non-linear pulsed laser technique capable of providing detailed molecular level orientation & conformational information of interfacial species.
Application of the technique to thin film structures may result in complex spectra which require deconvolution.
In the co-propagating beam geometry, three periodicities describing the relationship between film thickness & SF intensity are found.
Thickness/Phase Effect In SFS Spectra( 3 SF beam Thickness/Phase Effect In SFS Spectra( 3 SF beam theoretical model)theoretical model)
The phase and intensity of the SF signal arising from thin cellulose films on The phase and intensity of the SF signal arising from thin cellulose films on reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness. reflective substrates (gold) is a function of the cellulose film thickness.
a) water/cellulose/gold a) water/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cmIR=2878cm-1-1(r+)(r+)
Dominant Periodicity=268nmDominant Periodicity=268nmMinor Periodicities=296nm, 2857nmMinor Periodicities=296nm, 2857nm
b) water/cellulose/goldb) water/cellulose/gold interface.interface. IR=2966cmIR=2966cm-1-1(r-)(r-)
c) air/cellulose/gold c) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2878cmIR=2878cm-1-1(r+)(r+)
d) air/cellulose/gold d) air/cellulose/gold interface. interface. IR=2966cmIR=2966cm-1-1(r-)(r-)
Dominant Periodicity=267nmDominant Periodicity=267nmMinor Periodicities=294nm, 2857nmMinor Periodicities=294nm, 2857nm
Dominant Periodicity=238nmDominant Periodicity=238nmMinor Periodicities=248nm, 6024nmMinor Periodicities=248nm, 6024nm
Dominant Periodicity=237nmDominant Periodicity=237nmMinor Periodicities=247nm, 6024nmMinor Periodicities=247nm, 6024nm
If further sources of SF generation are considered, seven additional periodicities can be simulated.
210-6 410-6 610-6 810-6 0.00001
1
2
3
4
210-7 410-7 610-7 810-7 110-6
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Air/cellulose/gold interface, IR=2878cm-1, r+ vibrational mode
Applying the 5 SF beam theoretical model, we can describe the cellulose thickness/phase effect more explicitly.
The three periodicities (red) which are also derived from the 3 beam model are predicted by the 5 beam model, although they do not have the highest intensities.
We have not accounted for beam attenuation which will decrease SF intensity.
Substrates of well defined thickness are presently being prepared for experimental verification of the model’s predictions.
Periodicity(nm)Periodicity(nm) SF Intensity(arb)SF Intensity(arb)
6024.16024.1 0.8600620.860062
2551.022551.02 0.4383710.438371
1798.561798.56 16.439416.4394
1392.761392.76 7.268527.26852
342.231342.231 7.86517.8651
302.115302.115 0.3444390.344439
287.853287.853 21.765821.7658
274.876274.876 8.64498.6449
248.26248.26 0.4841840.484184
238.55238.55 18.920218.9202
d(nm)
d(nm)
Nor
mal
ized
SF
Inte
nsity
Nor
mal
ized
SF
Inte
nsity
Normalized SF intensity on resonance versus cellulose thickness
Funding NSF Forest Bioproducts Research Initiative of The University of Maine
The University of Maine Graduate School
Acknowledgements:
Advisor Dr. David Neivandt Dr. Michael Mason
Postdoctoral Dr. Joerg Fick Fellow
Graduate Student Sarah Sterling