Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Report DRAFT
Subsurface Investigation West Genesee Street
Village of Fayetteville County of Onondaga, New York
February 2006
SUBSURFACE JNVESTIC,ATION WEST GENESEE STREET
VILLAGE OF l'A YETTEVILLE < 'Ol!NTY 01' ONONllACJJ\, NEW YORK
Prepared for
HD!, Property Group 7085 Manlius Center Road Ea;;l Syracuse. NY 13057
Prepared by
S&W REDEVELOPMENT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC 430 EAST GENESEE STREET, SUITE401
SYRACUSE, NEW YORK 13202
February 2006
Project No, N.5025. IO
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... .
SECTION 2 - SITE SETTING............................................................................................. 2 2.1 - SITE DESCRIPTION . . . ... . .. . .. ... ... .................................................................... 2 2.2 - SITE HISTORY..................................................................................................... 3
SECTION 3 - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION METHODS.............................................. 5
3.1-SOILBORINGS..................................................................................................... 5 3.2-MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION............................................................ 5 3.3 --SITE SURVEY....................................................................................................... 6
SECTION 4 - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESULTS................................................ 7
4.1 - SITE HYDROGEOLOGY ..................................................................................... 7 4.2-SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS................................................................... 7
SECTION 5 -- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS............................................................ 10
5.I--SUMMARY............................................................................................................ IO 5.2 - CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................... 10
Figure .. No.
1 Site Location 2 Monitoring Well Location 3 Groundwater Contoms
LIST OF PIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
1 Groundwater Elevations 2 Field Measurements 3 Soil Sample Analytical Results - SVOCs 4 Soil Sample Analytical Results - VOCs 5 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results~ SVOCs 6 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results~ VOCs
LIST OF APPENDICIES
A Phase I ESA Report B Boring Logs C Laboratory Analytical Results
-ii-
SECTION 1- INTRODUCTION
S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLC (SWRNA) completed a Subsurface
Investigation at a site in Fayetteville, New York (Figure 1) that includes five contiguous
properties, located at 129 West Genesee Street, 125 West Genesee Street, 107 Highbridge
Street, 117 I-lighbridgc Street, and I 00 Fitch Street, respectively. These properties
encompass approximately 2 acres of land. The Subsurface Investigation was requested
by HDL Property Group based on the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA).
The site is currently occupied by four (4) buildings totaling approximately 20,000 square
feet (ft2) in aggregate, plus one (1) self service car wash facility. The Subsurface
Investigation was carried out in an attempt to establish whether contamination may exist
at the site, in connection with its past commercial use. Specifically, it is known that
gasoline sales and dry cleaning operations took place at the site for decades, and that
these types of activities can potentially cause soil and groundwater contamination. This
report presents the findings of the Subsurface Investigation which included soil and
groundwater sampling that was undertaken at the site in December 2005.
J:IPROJECTS\N-xxx.x\N5000\N5025 - HDL J'aycttcvillc Ph 2\Phuse 2 lnve~tigMion\[lart-Faycttcvillc Report.doc 1
SI<:CTION 2 - SITE SETTING
2.1-srn: ])ESCRIPTION
The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New
York, and consists of five (5) contiguous parcels. The site is generally flat with a slight
elevation decrease from north to south. A l 977 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
7 .5 minute topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the site
elevation is approximately 435-foct above mean sea leveL Limestone Creek is located
immediately east of the site, and flows to the north.
The northwest parcel of the site, located at 129 West Genesee Street, is currently used as
a dry cleaning business. This area contains a one single story, slab on-grade concrete
block building, with a tar rolled roof system.
The parcel immediately south of the dry cleaning facility is currently used as a dental
office and residential apartment, located at 127 Highbridge Street. A two story wood
fi:amed structure with an asphalt shingle roof system occupies this area.
The parcel cast of tbc dry cleaning building is currently occupied by Cingular, a retail
cellular telephone business, located at 125 West Genesee St. This parcel is occupied by a
one story, slab on grade, steel sided and concrete block building with a steel roof system.
The southernmost parcel, south of Fitch Street., has a professional office building. One
split level two story office building with brick siding and an asphalt shingle roof system
occupies this area.
The easternmost parcel of the site is occupied by a five (5) bay, self-serve, steel sided car
wash facility, with an attached garage at the cast end of the bays. Based on a
conversation with Richard Leneker, each bay contains an underground holding tank to
capture debris from vehicle washing activities. The collection tanks connect to the sewer
system and water from the tanks discharge to the municipal sewer. Debris and other
materials stay in the tanks and is reportedly pumped out twice each year.
J:\PROJECTS\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - l !DL Fayetteville Ph 2\Phase 2 lnvcstign!ion\llart-Fayette'>'i!le Report doe 2
2.2 - SITE HISTORY
Historical information is summarized below, based on a previously completed Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment CESA) Rcpo11 for the site (SWRt"J:A, July 2005), which is
included in this report as Appendix A.
The dry cleaning facility is currently owned by the Burlingame Family Limited
Partnership, who conveyed the property in 1994 by Richard Casale and Roderick
Burlingame. Casale and Burlingame acquired the property from R&L Family, Inc. in
1993, who had acquired the property from the Shell Oil Company in 1979. According to
deed records, Shell Oil owned the parcel in whole or in pari since 1929, when it
purchased the parcel from Stewm1 Oil and Service Company, Inc. Stewart Oil acquired
the site from Orris and Lena Orman in 1922, who themselves had purchased the property
from Alice Steadman in 1919. Elisha Steadman owned the property from 1892 to 1917.
According to deed records, it appears that Shell Oil also acquired adjacent properties
formerly owned by David and Mary Boyd (1905), Joseph and Elizabeth Staple (I 905),
Netti Wilcox (1930), Mary Wickes (I 930), and Harold Sherman (1958).
The Cingular building and dental office parcels arc currently owned by David Mueller
(Cingular) and Dr. Richard Sherwood (dental office) and were acquired from 107
Highbridgc Corporation in 1995 and l 990, respectively. Prior to that, the two properties
were jointly owned by Edmund Coughlin, Philip Coughlin, and Ralph Ross, who
acquired them from the former 107 1-Iighbridge Corp in 1965. Records indicate that
Coughlin, Coughlin, and Ross were tenants of James House who sold them the two
parcels in 1960. Deed records show that John J. Kinsella owned the property directly
east of the Shell gasoline station in 1958, and it appears that House and Kinsella owned
the parcels for sometimes up to the l 950's.
The southern office building area is cun-ently owned by Raymond Grimaldi and Betty
Harig (Grimaldi and Harig). Grimaldi and Harig purchased the property from H.
Douglas and Geraldine Johnson in 1983. The Johnsons acquired the site from Dorothy
Lowitz, William Berinstcin, and Donald McGinnis in 1977, who appear to have operated
under several corporate names including Coastal Securities, Inc. and Rusty Realty Corp.
Lowitz, Berinstein, and McGinnis appear to have co-owned the property in various
capacities since at least 1969 when it was acquired from Marie A. McDonald. Marie and
J:\PROJECTS\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - HDL Fayetkville Ph 2\Ph;L<;e 2 lnvestigalion\l !art-Fayetteville Report.doc 3
Robert McDonald acquired the property from Grace Lester in 1945. Prior to that, it was
owned by Elisha and Civilla Lester, who owned it since 1897.
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1904, 1909, 1919, 1943, and 1951 arc included in the
Phase I ESA Report (Appendix A). Figure 2 depicts the approximate locations fi)[ some
of the notable historic uses of the site.
Maps from 1904 and 1909 show the WM Morrison Glove and Mitten Factory on the
northwest portion of the site and Carl Graham Carriage Repairing on the northeast
portion of the site.
The 1919 map shows the Fire Department near the center of the site, with a transfonner
house adjacent to it. The map also shows what appears to be an auto repair facility
located on the northeast portion of the site and a clearly labeled gasoline tank is located
north of the facility.
The 1929 map shows a gas station with four (4) gasoline tanks on the northwest corner of
the site. The transformer house is also shown on the 1929 map, as well as an automobile
sales facility, located on the northwest portion of the site. The map of the automobile
facility shows two clearly labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building. Also, a
building labeled "Battery Service" is located near the west portion of the property.
A 1943 Sanborn Map shows the previously mentioned gasoline station (northwest portion
of the site), transformer house, and battery service building, however, the automobile
facility on the northeast corner of the site is no longer present. A smaller building labeled
"Vac'' (vacant) is located in place of the northeast auto facility.
The 1951 Sanborn Map shows the northwest comer gasoline station (showing two clearly
labeled gasoline tanks on the side of the building), battery service building, transformer
house, and an additional gas station occupying the vacant building formerly on the
northeast portion of the property.
J:\PROJECTS\N~xxxx\N5000\N5025 - HD!. Faycllcvilk Ph 2\Phasc 2 !nvcstigalion\Hart·Faycttcvi!le Report.doc 4
SECTION 3 -SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION METHODS
The subsurface investigation was conducted to determine if there is evidence of soil and
groundwater contamination at the site in connection with its historic use. The soil boring
locations were selected based on the areas immediately downgradient and upgradient of
potential contaminant sources. Soil and groundwater samples were collected and
analyzed for chemical contaminants by the methods described below.
3.1 - SOIL BORINGS
Five (5) soil borings (SB~ 1, SB-2, SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5) were advanced at the site on
December 16, 2005 (Figure 2). A truck-mounted drill rig was used to advance 4 ¼-inch
hollow stem augers to several feet below the water table. Continuous soil samples were
collected using a 2-inch diameter steel split spoon sampler. Soil samples were visually
examined by a SWRNA geologist and field screened for volatile organic vapors using a
photoionization detector (PID). Soil boring observations and PID readings are included
in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B).
A soil sample was collected from each soil boring for laboratory analysis, from the
interval with the highest PID reading, or based on visual or olfactory evidence of
contamination. If no impact was apparent from PID readings or direct observation, a
::;ample near the water table (soil/groundwater interface) was selected for analysis. Each
sample was placed in glass sample containers, packed in an ice-filled cooler, and sent to
Paradigm Environmental Services, Inc. to be analyzed for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 and for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by
EPA Method 8270.
3.2 - MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION
Two-inch diameter PVC monitoring wells MW-1, -2, -3, -4, and -5 were constructed in
soil borings SB-1, -2, -3, -4, and--5, respectively. Each monitoring well was constructed
of I 0-feet of 0.01 ~inch slot well screen, with a #0 silica sand pack extending from the
bottom to 2-feet above the screen. Two feet ofbcntonite pellets were placed on top of the
sand filter pack and hydrated. The remaining annulus was filled with sand. The wells
were finished with a cement pad and secured with flush mount bolt down covers. Well
construction diagrams are included in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B). The
J:\PROJEC1S\N.xxxx\N5000\N5025 - IIDL farcttcvillc Ph 2\rhasc 2 !nvestigation\1-fart·Faycttcville RcporLdoc 5
monitoring wells were developed after installation by removmg a rn1mmum on ten
volumes of water.
On December 23, 2005, groundwater was sampled from each of the five (5) monitoring
wells. Prior to sampling, the depth to water was recorded and the wells were purged of
three volumes of water. Groundwater field parameters were recorded including
temperature, conductivity, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, Eh, and turbidity (Table 2).
Groundwater samples were placed in sample containers provided by Paradigm, packed in
ice, and shipped to be analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs.
3.3-SITE SURVEY
SWRNA personnel completed a survey to establish elevations for the top of each
monitoring well, relative to a datum of 100 feet. The depth to groundwater was used to
determine a groundwater elevation for each well, and a groundwater contour map was
prepared (Figure 3).
J:\PROJECI S\N-xxxx\N5000\N5025 - J lDL Fayetteville Ph 2\Pha,e 2 !nvesti:sation\l lart-Fayettcville Report.doc 6
SECTION 4- SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION RESULTS
4.1-SITE IIYDROGEOLOGY
Soil borings SB-1, SB-3, and SB-5 were advanced to 14-feet bgs and soil borings SB-2
and SB-4 were advanced to 16-foet bgs. The predominant soil types at the site arc fine
silt and sand, with lesser amounts of gravel.
The depth to groundwater in each well at the site on December 23, 2005, measured from
the top of the PVC riser, was 8.17 fret in MW-1, 8.94 feet in MW-2, 5.14 feet in MW-3,
7.88 feet in MW-4, and 8.53 feet in MW-5. Table 1 summarizes the depth to water and
groundwater elevation data. The groundwater elevations determined from these
measured depths indicate that groundwater flows to the north across most of the site, but
near Limestone Creek, east of the car wash, an eastward flow component toward the
creek is apparent.
4.2-FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
A. SUBSURFACE SOILS
Petroleum-type odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3,
but no odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-4 and SB-5. There was no
visual evidence of impact in any of the soil borings.
All soil samples were field screened for total VOCs using a PIO, and the results are
included in the subsurface boring logs (Appendix B). PID readings from soil borings SR-
1, -2, -3, and -4 ranged from non-detect (0 parts per million fppm]) to 101.3 ppm, O.l
ppm, l l 1.6 ppm, and 0.9 ppm, respectively. All PID readings for SB-5 were non-detect
(0 ppm).
Soil samples were taken from the 6- to 8-fcet interval for lab analysis from soil borings
SB-1, SI3-2 and SB-4, which was slightly above the water table. For borings SB-2 and
SB-4, the depth was chosen because there was no evidence of contamination from the
field screening procedure. Boring SB-1 had a relatively high PID reading (compared to
other soil samples from that boring) slightly below the water table, between 8 to 10 feet,
but there was not enough soil at this depth in the sampling spoon for analysis, so the
J:\PROJECTSIN-x;,;;xx\N5000\N5025 - llDL Fayetteville Ph 2\Pha~e 2 lnvestigationlllmt·Fayelte>·il!e Report.doc 7
sample immediately above it, from 6 to 8 feet, was analyzed instead. Soil samples were
taken from the 4- to 6-feet interval for lab analysis from soil borings SB-3 due to the
relatively high PID reading at this depth compared to other PID readings from this
boring. At SB-5 the 4- to 6-fcct interval was chosen because there was inadequate
sample volume from other sampling intervals above the water table in this boring.
Soil sample analytical results are presented in Table 3 and 4, compared to the NYSDEC
Technical and Administrative Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) #4046 recommended
soil cleanup objectives (RSCOs). Results arc summarized below.
1. VOCs None of the subsurface soil samples contained VOC concentrations
above laboratory detection limits.
2. SVOCs SVOCs were detected, but below RSCOs, in soil samples from
borings SB-3 and SB-4. Phenanthrenc and 2-mcthylnaphthalcnc were detected in
the soil sample from SB-3, located upgradicnt of the dry cleaning facility. Bis(2-
ethylhcxyl) phthalate was detected in the soil sample from SB-4, located just
north of the car wash.
B. GROUNDWATER
Groundwater results are summarized in Table 5 and 6 and are compared to NYSDEC
Division of Water Technical and Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) Class GA ambient
water quality standards. Results arc summarized below.
1. VOCs Groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4,
and MW-5 did not contain VOCs above laboratory detection limits. The
groundwater sample from MW-1 contained a total of four (4) VOCs, with three
(J) above Class GA standards and guidance values, including cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, vinyl chloride, and acetone. Chloroform was detected, but below
Class GA standards. Monitoring well MW -1 is located downgradient and north
of the dry cleaning facility.
2. SVOCs Groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4,
and MW-5 did not contain any SVOCs above laboratory detection limits. The
groundwater sample from monitoring well MW-I contained two (2) SVOCs,
J:\PROJECTS\N-.xxxx\N50ll0\N5025 • HDL l'aycttcvil!c Ph 2\Pha,c 2 lnvcstigation\llart-Fayeneville Report.d,lc 8
bis(2-dhy!hexyl)phthalate and iluorene, but only bis(2-ethylhcxyl)phthalatc was
detected above standards.
Laboratory results for soil and groundwater data arc included in Appendix C.
J;\PROJECfS\N-xxxx\N5000\NS025 . lJOL Fayetteville Ph 2\Phase 2 lnvestigation\J lart-Fayeuevilk Rq1ort.doe 9
SECTION 5 - SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1-SUMMARY
The Subsurface Investigation was completed in December 2005. Five (5) soil borings,
SB-I, SB-2, SB-3, SB-4, and SB-5, were advanced at the site and completed as
monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5, respectively.
Soil samples collected from these borings did not contain any SVOCs or VOCs above
TAGM RSCOs. The soil sample from SB-3 contained two SVOCs that were below
RSCOs, and the soil sample from SB-4 contained one SVOC that was below RSCOs.
Petroleum type odors were detected in soil samples from borings SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3,
but there was no visual evidence of contamination. The soil samples from borings SB-4
and·SB-5 did not show any visual, olfactory, or PJD evidence of soil contamination.
Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5
did not contain any SVOes or voes above laboratory detection limits. The water
sample from MW-1, which is located downgradient of the dry cleaning facility, contained
one svoe (bis(2-cthylhcxyl)phthalatc) and three voes (cis-1,2-dichloroethcne, vinyl
chloride, and acetone) above Class GA water quality standards and guidance values.
5.2 - CONCLUSIONS
The Subsurface Investigation has determined that:
Y VOCs and SVOCs were detected above Class GA groundwater quality
standards in one of the five groundwater samples collected from site
monitoring wells;
:.. none of the soil samples analyzed contained organic compounds (VOes or
SVOCs) above Nev,1 York State recommended soil cleanup objectives
(RSCOs).
Monitoring well MW-I, the only wel! that produced groundwater samples containing
VOCs and SVOCs above standards, is located in the portion of the site where a fonner
gasoline station had operated for at least 50 years prior to the current dry cleaning facility
that now occupies the area. The VOCs detected above Class GA standards in the
J:\PROJECTS\N.xxxx\N501lll\N5025 • HD!. Fayetteville Ph 2\Phasc 2 lnvc,1ign1ion\flarl-Fayetkvillc Report doc 10
groundwater sample from MW-1 include two chlorinated compounds ( cis-1,2-
dichloroethenc and vinyl chloride) that are potential degradation components of
tetrachloroethenc (PCE), an historically common dry cleaning solvent. This suggests the
detected chlorinated compounds in MW-1 may be associated with past dry cleaning
activity.
Acetone is used as an industrial solvent for fats, oils, waxes, resins, rubbers, plastics,
pharmaceuticals and rubber cements, and its presence as a contaminant may be associated
with the manufacture of these products. However, there is no indication that these
products were ever manufactured at the site. Because acetone is a common laboratory
cleaning agent, its detection in water samples is sometimes a laboratory artifact.
Petroleum odors in soil samples may be related to prior contamination associated with the
forn1er gasoline station, but the absence of VOCs in the soil samples and the absence of
petroleum related VOCs in groundwater samples suggest that petroleum-related
subsurface impact at the sampling points does not appear to be significant. It should be
noted that soil and groundwater samples were not taken as part of this scope in the
immediate vicinity of the former petroleum USTs in the northwest corner of the site. lt is
also noted that Parcel 4, south of Pitch Street, was not included in this scope based on
historical uses. The scope of this investigation therefore indicates the general site
subsurface conditions, but does not provide an extensive investigation of potentially
impacted soils from the various site uses.
J:\PROJECTSIN-;..xn\N5000\N5025 - HDL Fayd!evillc Ph 2\Phase 2 Jnvestigation\!fart-Faycltevil!e Report.doc 11
Figures
' I •
( {------
./ NEW YORK f -·--
1,000
,&:=ft' QUADRANGLE LOCATION
SCALE in FEET
0 1,000 3,000
Contour Interval: 10 Feet
Map Taken From: USGS 7.5 Minute Series Syracuse East and Manlius Topographic
Quadrangle ( 1957 Photorevised
5,000
1978 )(www .nysgis. state.ny .us/quads/usgsd rg .htm)
S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLG
Syracuse, NY
OATE:2/20D6 JOB No.: N5025
Phase II Site Investigation Hort Development
Fayetteville, NY
FIGURE
Site Location
GENESEE STREET FORMER
GASOLINE ~
STATION'&~--~ ,:: - - ·-··-· --
-$-MW-1 I t ~ - - ., ·---------~ LU H
I ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' LU h ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' CINGULAR ' ' ct tlJ , ______ ,
' ' ' MW-2,;I . '(PARCR ·2r ·- ·- ·-·'.·:-_·_:;< ·- __ , ' I -$- ~·:>...,_- - - - - - - ~ (.)
~ I -----~, DRYCLEANER
D CAR WASH MW-4' LU (/) ' ' ' I ' -' (PARCEL 1) (PARCEL 5) < LU
, _____ ' (;)
~-3. _J ' 0 '-, '-, ,-, '-, '-, '-, Cl '' '' '' '' '' '' ' h - ,_ ,_ ' - ,_ ' - ' - ' ct DENTAL • (/) O'.l I ' ::r: OFF!CE
' LU (;) I (PARCEL - MW-5 ' ~ - I D ' -::r:
I ,__,
- - - - -··-··-· -··-··- - - -I I
FITCH STREET \
I \
\ I
I \ I
\ I
\ I -$-MW-
Soil Boring/ \ Monitoring Well Location
I OFFICE \ (Approximate)
I BUILD!NG \
I (PARCEL4) \
I \
I
S&W Redevelopment I FALLS BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT I, LLC PROPOSED WALGREEN'S SITE I of North America, LLC WEST GENESEE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, NY [] Existing Strncture I Syracuse, r-s'ew York ·- ·- ·- ·-· -··-··-··
,-, I ; Approximate location of FIGURE2
'-" Former Structure MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS Jan-06 Proj No. N5025
FORMER GASOLINE STATION
GENESEE STREET
· - - -MWCI f86~43') ~ : ------: __ +;!. ___ __,'--- ,- --; '
I : : CINGULAR : Mv\!-4 (8$.93')
-,°'.'. __ '."._,,-_ -,.-~·M.::Wi-~2~8~6;.;,61~'~,$,t-·i]P;:AR;:C;:E[:;.t'' __ c;!j_f, ,.~-.. ' -,-~ -[ ,_, _______ ,
' ~~~~ ' ORYCLEANER C . \ \ '· I , ~~~' (PARCEL 1) --"(P~c:C:.,ECclcc5!..}-'\~-- ,.
VV-3(87.43') , : ·""· '-, '-, '-, '-,
86.5'
I "'~---- :_, :.: :_, :_, "-.'
L------'1.-----" <I> ' DENTAL OFFICE (PARCEL MW-5 (86:97
' D
"-:'. LU LU a:: 0
LU < 0 h (/)
LU :.
' -FITCH STREE
·,.-i
~-------- -----\-------
OFFICE BUILDING (PARCEL 4)
\
\ \
i 87.01
<I> MW-3 (87.43')
X 87.0'
Monitoring Well (Groundwater Elevation-ft)
Groundwater Contours and flow direction
S&W Redevelopment FALLS BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT I. LLC PROPOSED WALGREEN"S SITE
[] Existing Structure
Approximate Location of Former Stn.icture
of North America, LLC Syracuse, New York
WEST GENESEE STREET. FAYETTEVILLE, NY
FIGURE 3 GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
Jan-06 Proj No. N5025
Tables
Table L Groundwater Elevation Data. Phase 2 lnvestigalion. Hart Development, Fayette1lle, NY.
Monitoring Date
Well 1.0.
MW-1 Oec-05 MW-2 Dec.OS MW-3 Dec.OS MW-4 Oec-05 MW-5. Dec-Os
OTW - Depth to water. TOW Total depth of well
Reference Point
Top o_f_Pyc Top_of PV~ Top of PVC
_T?p__of PYQ Too of PVC
TOW (ft.) Purge
OTW (ft.) Volume (gal.)
14.0 2.3 8.17 16.0 3.1 8.94 14.0 4.0 5.14
- -14.0 3.1 7.88
--16 0 2.6 8.53
Table 1. Groundwater Elevation Data. Phase 2 lnvestigat1on. Hart Development. Fayetteille. NY
Monitoring Date
Well I.D.
MW·1 Dec•05 MW·2 Dec.OS MW-3 Dec·OS MW-4 Dec-05 MW-5 Dec·OS
OTW • Dep(h to water. TDW - Total doplh ofwe!I.
Reference Point
Top of PVC "fop of_P'{C
_Top of PVC Top of PVC
' Ton of PVC
Well Elev.(ft) TOW {ft.) Purge
DTW {ft,) Volume (gaL)
;:::~ ..
14.0 2.3 8.17 16.0 3.1 8.94
' 92.57 14.0 4.0 5.14 94.81 14.0 3.1 7.88 9s:so -- ----
16.0 2.6 8.53
Groundwater Elev. (ft}
86.43 -
86.61 87.43 86.93 86.97
Tab'e 3 So,1 S~fl'p'c labornlo,y Allaiyt,cal Results. SerniNo!at,le Organic Compounds Phase 2 lnvesi,gatio~ /·fart D<evelopme~I, Fayetlcv1lle, NY
- ~=----· s,m le l<!&n1ilic~1ion-Ana\ylc (mgl~g) RSCD" S8-1 S8·2 SB,3 · sa:i~ SS:S
- "-,6--a· -l~~· l'!ft 6-6' 4:S'l-
STARS SEMIVOlATlLES BY ~PA 8Z70 ArenaphlheM "' '" "' '" '" '" AcMJphthyle~e "' '" '" '" "' '" Anlllfarene "' '" " " "' "" [JeM(a)anthrnre~e 0224 "' "' "' "' '" 8eozo(a)pycene ooo, "' "' "' "' "' B enzo( bl nucrnn thena 022 "' "' '" "' "° 8 e ozo( g, h.1 )p,,rylene "' "' "' "° "" "° Beozo(~)nuoranll'cM on "' "' '" '° '" Ghrysene °' '" "° "" '° "' o:ethyi phtha!ate . ' '° '° "' '" "" O:melhyl phha!ale ' "° "" "° "' '" Butyi\oo,,zyipht~a 'ate "' '" '" "' "" '" ms12-ethylhexyl) phthalate s, '" '" "' 0422 "" 2-Ch1omn8phthale~a '" "" "" '" '" He,ach!ocohen,one °'' '" '" "" "° "' Hexact,1ornelhaM "" '" '° '" '" Hexach'omcyc!open\aGCeno "" '" " "' "" 11 axadl:orobu!aO·ene "" "" '" '° " N-N1lrow-<:J1-i1-j)rop:yarn,nB "" "° '° "' "' N ,N,1rnsod'p~enf2m:~e " "° " '" " N-N1t,osodimelhyiam1ne " "" "" "" " lsopborom> "" "" "" " " BenLyl alcohol "" "" "" " " 0-0<l~zol~ren "' "' '° "' '" '" 2 .).'.eLtiyin~ pl1t1,a:er.e 3$4 '" '" 16.1 '" '" O;beN{a,h)ant~,,ac,,ne 0.014 '" '° "' "" '" FlucranU,ene "' '" ,o ,o ,o ,o fluvrer,e "' ,o '" "' "" "" l,1dMo{ 1,2,3-cdJpyrene ooo, '" ,o " ,o "" Nap/>~lha'ene n " '° "" "" "" Pl;e~ar.:hmr.o w "" ,o ''" '" "" Pyrene w " "" '" "' " Ac,rn~ph\hlyer.o " "° "' ,o " "" 1,2-o,es~lorobe~zer.e " " "" ,0 " 1,3,0,ct,lcrobenzorao " " " '" '" 1+Dichlombe,-,.,er,e '" "" '" ,o " 1 _2,4-Tnchforobo,0 zepe " " ,o '" "' N,!rcbenze~e 0, "' '" "' ,o ,o 2,4-01r.o:,olo'"ene ,o '" '" " '" 2,6-Dlrnlmto:uMe ' '" '" " '" '" llis{Z-chlo,ethyl) e<t,er '" '" '" "" '" B's{Z-chlomethoxyl) methan "" ,o '" "" "" 8.s(,'-,;h!a,o,sopropyt) etne, "" '" '" "' "" 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ethet "' "" ,o "" '" 4-Ch:oraphenyl plw~yl e\he, "" '" "" "" " Ben;:;G'~e "" " "" " " 3,3' -0:ch'o,OCCn~,G,ne " "' '" "" '" 4-Chl<,>ra~<oe on "" "' '° '" '° 2-NIIW3ml,na 0.43 '" "° "' '" '" 3,N,troanil,nn " '" '" '" ""
,, 4-N,tro,;n;1ina '" " '" ,o '" P!leMI 00, " '" '" '" '" 2-Ch'omplier.ol " " '" ,o "" '" 2,4-01ch'ornpMeMI '' '" '" ,o
"' '" 2,6-D;ch'orophenol " " " "" '" 7. 4,5-l nchlmopr.enol " '" " " "" "" 2,4,6-Tr.chk>ropt,enol "' ,o '" '" " Peniachiorophenol ' "' " "" " "" 4-Chloro-3- mdhylpher,ol '" " "" " '" " 2-,'l.e!hylpt,e,,ol " "' " "" '" '" 4-Melhylpher,ol " '" '" " '" '" 2,4 Oinethy!phe~o! "" '" " '" ND 2-N,tmpMenol '" '" "' "' '" '" 4-N,trophenol 0, '" '" "' '" "' 2,4-0in;irophenoi " "' ,o '" "" '" 4.6-D,nrtro-2-metf·,y;p~eno: '" " "" '" " """" " '" '" " ___ _/':lg_ '" ----,¥~~~-"_C,G _ ~sco Rec,,,,,,,,r,,ed S<>J c ""'-" °"••'*'"' """ fyo;n N~" Y«\ s,,,, o,,...,t,c,'1 ol ~,,.,,,,,w.,o,,l c"'~"'"·""
(~'YSU~C) T,ct._, a,od A</-~.;;~~.\~, C..<d°"c, •;,,,,_,__-,,.--OL,o (TAC\f) 40<6 ''""''"'°"'-''" (1VZ0,-,"'2J.
&-.,co K 9'«;/o"1 C'° ~4~a'.as "'""'-.nd O,taee"3 lne RSCO
ND - >M Deta<'ed
Table 4. Soil Sample Laboratory Analytical Results. STARS Volatile Organic Compounds. Phase 2 Investigation. Hart Development. Fayetteville, NY
-Analyte {mg/kg) RSCO*
Sam;, le Identification SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 $8-4
STARS Volatiles by EPA 8260 Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND Bromomethane ND ND ND ND Bromoforrn NO ND ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 0.6 ND ND ND ND Chloroethane 1.9 ND ND ND ND Ch/oromethane NO ND ND ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND ND ND ND Chloroform 03 ND ND ND ND Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND 1, 1-Dichloroethane 0.2 ND ND ND ND 1,2-Oichloroethane 0.1 ND ND ND ND 1.1-Dichloroethene 04 ND ND ND NO cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND trans-1,2-Oichloroethene 0.3 ND NO ND ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND cis-1,3-Dich loropropane ND ND ND ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropane 0.3 ND ND ND ND Methylene Chloride 0.1 ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.6 ND ND ND NO Tetrachloroethene 14 ND ND ND ND 1, 1, 1-Trich!oroethane 0.8 ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2"Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND Trichloroethene 0.7 ND ND ND ND T richlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND Vinyl chloride 0.2 ND ND ND ND Benzene 0.03 ND ND ND ND Ch!orobenzene 1.7 ND ND ND ND Ethylbenzene 5.5 ND ND ND ND Toluene 15 ND ND ND ND m,p-Xylene 1.2 ND ND ND ND o-Xylene 1.2 ND ND ND ND Styrene ND ND ND ND 1,2-Oichlorobenzene 7.9 ND ND ND ND 1,3-Oichlorobenzene 1.6 NO ND ND ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8.5 ND ND ND ND Acetone 0.2 ND ND ND ND 2-Butanone 0.3 ND ND ND ND 2-Hexanone ND ND ND ND 4-Methy!-2-pentanone 1 ND ND ND ND Carbon Disulfide 2.7 ND ND ND ND Vin):':! Acetate ND ND ND ND
SB-5
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND
• RSCO - Recommended So,! Cleanup Ob1echves l~ken from New Yofl; Stale Department of Environmental Gonserval,on
(NYSDEC) Techn,cal and Admin•slrn!ive Guidance Memorandum (TAGM) 4046 Merno,and~m (12/20/2002).
Bold Htgfil,gh[ed Cell indicales compund exceeds IM f{SCO
ND - Nol Oe!cctcd
Tab!@ 5 Gro~r,dwater Samp!e laboraiory Maiyti"1ll Resu:ls Semi-Volat,ie Organ,G Cornpouocls Phase 2 ln>·est1gat,<X1 HM Oove!oµrn,:ml Fayelta,o!'e. NY
,, -==-= Analyte (ug/L)
EMIVOl.ATILES av EPA 82711 STARSS Ace~aph! AC<lnapti! Aflthrncec
8enz(a)an aenzo(a)py BBnzc(b)fl 8-0nzo(g,t, Ben~Oik)f Chrysene Oie'.ltyi Ph
o;me\hyl p Bu!y',benz lfa{2-eihy 2-Ch!ornn Haxact1'o, Hexach'or Hexach!or liexach!or N,Nrlroso
N-N,lroso
N-Nilrosoo fwpt,omn llenzyl alee o;nen~oru 2~·uthyln D,ben>(a, fluoranlh Flc,o<or.e
lnd~no/1,2 Napha:na Phena~th, P,.,-ena 1,2-0id\lo 1,3-0ict>lo 1,4-0icl>lor 1.2,4-Tricll N,trob<,n, 2.4-0lnotr 2,6-0,nMo Bls(2-ct\!or !l1s(2·cllior 8,s(2-<;!lio 4-Bromop 4-Ch!owp f!enz,d1ne 3,3'-0ict>ivr 4-Chiornn 2,N,!roa~, 3-Niwam 4,Nitrnan,
Pheool 2-Ch!Gf"llp 2,4-D1cl1!Gf"ll 2,6,0,c!71or 2,4,5-Tricll 2.4.6-Tricll Pentaclllo, 4-Chlorn-3 1-Methylp~ 4-Melhylph 2.4-0imath 2-N1!r0,>he 4-N,tro;,he 2.4-0tnilro ~.6-0i~,tro BeM<>:cac,
hone hylone
-· lNacena rer.e
,wrar.!hene ,,)peryiePe
,uorM!hene
tha!a•o hha!~ie
ylph\hata1" lhmcyi) p!i&,a:a:a
aphthalene obemene oe\hane ocyc!openladiem, obutad;ene -d,·n-p,cylyam ne c,p!,enyiamane
;rnethylmn,ne
• hol
rnn aphtha'er.e h)Mthrace~e
'"' ,3-cd)pyrnne
!ene er,e
r<>l;.-entece rntcnze~e ober>ter.e 'orobe~zene ·~ otoluena ioJuene ethyl) e!he, octhoxyl) methane
rn,scpropyl) ether henyl p!1Myl e\her henyl phenyl e:het
obenzidir.e 11,ne ''t-e "ne line
he~ol p!,er,ol
ophenol 'crop~.ec,ol •orophonol {lj;Jhernil -me!hyiphenol
=> .enol ylpherml noi <ml phorml -2-n-,ethyipharn>I
" ,, , ,,l,~~11§,
,
TOGS'
5.3(G)
5D(G) Ooo;>(G) 0002{0) OOOL(G)
0002(GJ OD02(G)
S0{G) SO(G) SO{G) ,
rn
"'" , SjG) OS
50(G)
SC(G>
4 7(Gl
50(G) 50{G)
0JXJ2(G) 13(C} 50(G} 50(Gl
' ' ' 5{G)
" 5(GJ 0.07(G) 0.03(G)
S{G)
0.02(G) 5(G) 5(0) 510)
'"' 5{G)
S(Gl
SOjG)
10{G)
B"'1 >C,#g,t,a ""' '"""''" "'"'"""" e,-c,e<I, .,. RSCO ND - Not 0.C"t<O
~W-1 Sapp!a ldentifigation
MW-2 MW-3 ,w, MW-5
" " " " '" " " '" '" '" " '" " '" '" "" "" "" " " "' '" '" '" '" " '" "' '" '" "" '" " '" "" '° '" '° " " '" "" " "" " '" " '" '" "' '" " '" " " '" " '" '° '° 1----i'ft '° '" "" " ~ " '" '" "' "" '" " '° " " '° '" "" "" " '" " '" '" " '" " " '" " '" " '" '" '" "" '" '" '" '° " " '" '" '" '" " '" '"
'" '" "" '" " '° " '° " " '" " "" '" '" '" "' '" " "" '" "" "" "" " "' " '° "' '" '" '" '" " "" "' " '" " '° "' '° " " " " '° '" "" " "' " "' "" " "' " '°
,,, "' " "" "' '° '" '° '" "' '" "" "" '" '° '° "" "" "" '" "" "" "" "" "" " "' "" " "" "" " '" " " " '" '" '" "" "" "" "" "' "' '" " '" " "" "" " "" "' "" "' '" "" '° '° " "' "" '° '" "" '" '° "' '" "' " "' '° "" "' "" "' " "" "' " "' "" " '" '" "' "" "' "" ""
'° '" "" '° '" '° "" "' "" "" "' "" "" "' "" "" " '° '° '° '" "" " " "" "" "" "" '" '" "' '" '" '" " "" "' "" "' "' " "' "' "' "' '° "' " " "' '" "' '° "' '" "' '° " "' "' " NO "" '" " '° "' '° " '" '" "' "' '" '°
Owe__
"" Nil
"" " " '" " '° " '" " "' "" '" '" "' '" " '" '" " " '" '° " '° " "' " "' '" "" '" '" '" "' "" '" "" " '" "' "" '" '" '" '" "" "" '" '" "' "' '" "' "" "" " " '° "" "' "' '° "' '" -~
Table 6. Groundwater Sample Laboratory Analytical Results Volatile Organic Compounds. Phase 2 Investigation Hart Development Fayel!eville NY
Ana!yte (ug/L) TOGS" Samnte Identification
MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 o,a STARS VolaWes by EPA 8260 Bromodich!oromethane 50(G) ND NO ND ND ND ND Bromomethane 5(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Bromoform 50(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Carbon Tetrachloride 0.4{G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroethane 5{G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND ND ND ND ND ND Chloroform 7 4.64 ND ND ND ND ND Dibromoch!oromethane 50{G) ND NO ND ND ND ND 1.1-Dichloroethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-0ichloroethane 0.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1-Dichloroethene 0.7(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 79.1 ND ND ND ND ND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-0ichloropropane 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropane 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane o.2(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND Tetrachloroelhene 0.7(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND Trichloroethene 5 ND ND ND ND ND NO Tnchlorofluoromethane 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Vinyl chloride O 3{G) 14.9 NO ND ND ND ND Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND Chlorobenzene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Ethylbenzene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Toluene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND m,p-Xylene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND o-Xylene 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND Styrene S(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND Acetone 50(G) 295 ND ND ND ND ND 2-Butanone ND ND ND ND ND ND 2"Hexanone 50(G) ND ND ND ND ND ND 4-Methyl-2-penta rione ND ND ND ND ND ND Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND Vinvl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND TotalVOCs 393,64 ND ND ND ND ND • TOGS - NYSDEC De,ision of Waler Techr,ical and Ocpeta\,onsl Guidance Senes {TOGS} Class GA amb;ent wate, qua Hy standards
ecid Highl,ghled Ce!I indicales compund exceeds lhe RSCO
ND - Nol De!ecled
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Phase I ESA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following information summarizes the scope of services completed as pmi of this
investigation. These highlights are elaborated upon in the body of this report. Based on
the information contained herein, additional investigation of the property appears
warranted.
I. The subject site consists of five (5) contiguous parcels of real estate totaling
approximately 2-acrcs, with each tax parcel having a different owner. The parcels
are owned by Burlingame Family Ltd. Partnership (Parcel 1), David F. Mueller
(Parcel 2), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Grimaldi & Harig (Parcel 4), and
Raymond F. Lenckcr Living Trust (Parcel 5). According to the Onondaga
County Real Prope1iy Tax Services office, the subject parcels are identified as
Tax Map Numbers 018.-06-09.1 (Parcel 1), 018.-06-07.1 (Parcel 2), 018.-06-08
(Parcel 3), 018.-06-06.1 (Parcel 4), and 018.-06-07.2 (Parcel 5).
2. The subject site comprises the following locations: 129 West Genesee Street
(Parcel 1), 125 Wes[ Genesee Street (Parcel 2), 107 Highbridge Street (Parcel 3),
117 Highbridge Street (Parcel 4), and 100 Fitch Street (Parcel 5), Fayetteville,
New York (Figure 1). Land use surrounding the site consists of West Genesee
Street and then commercial businesses (North), offices and residential homes
(South), Limestone Creek (East), and retail and restaurant businesses (West).
3. The subject site is generally flat, with a slight change in elevation from north
(higher) to south (lower). A 1977 United Stales Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5·
minute series topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the
site elevation is approximately 435-fcct above mean sea level (Figure 1).
Presumed hydrogeologic and groundwater flow direction could not be discerned
from surficial indicators.
4. The subject property was identified as the result of a search and review of federal
and State environmental regulatory agency databases. Parcel I was identified in
• 1 •
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database indicating that an
on~site business generates or stores hazardous waste as defined by RCRA.
Adjacent properties were reviewed to the specified search distances stipulated in
ASTM E 1527-00 (Section 7.2. l.l). Fifty-four (54) sites were identified within
the specified search radii. Thirty-four (34) of these sites could not be mapped due
to inadequate address information. A copy of the complete database search repori
is provided in Appendix H.
4. During research conducted as part of this investigation, eight (8) Recognized
Environmental Conditions (REC) were identified:
I. Possible impacts related to historic auto repair and gas station uses on the northeast portion of the site
2. Possible impacts related to historic presence of transformers (PCBs) on the north portion of the site
3. Possible impacts related to 50 year presence of gasoline station (Shell Station) on the northwest corner of the site
4. Evidence of existing Underground Storage Tank (UST) on the northwest p01iion of the site
5. Possible impacts from 25 year history of dry cleaning operations on the northwest po1iion of the site
6. Possible historic impacts from floor drains in dry cleaning (former Shell Station) facility
7. Presence and unknown historic use of piping exiting foundation of dry cleaning facility (former Shell station)
8. Possible impacts related to compressor operation in dirt floor crawl space area on west portion of the site
SECTION! -INTRODUCTION
S&W Redevelopment of North America, LLC (SWRNA) completed a Phase I
Enviromnental Site Assessment (ESA) on five (5) contiguous parcels of real estate
located at 129 West Genesee Street (Parcel 1), 125 West Genesee Street (Parcel 2), 107
Highbridge Street (Parcel 3), 117 1-Iighbridge Street (Parcel 4), and 100 Fitch Street
(Parcel 5), Fayetteville, New York (Figure 1). The parcels are improved with four (4)
buildings totaling approximately 20,000ft2 in aggregate, and one (1) self service car wash
facility. Currently, the parcels are owned by Burlingame Family Ltd. Partnership (Parcel
I), David F. Mueller (Parcel 2), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Grimaldi & Harig (Parcel
4), and Raymond F. Lencker Living Trust (Parcel 5). According to the Onondaga County - 2 -
Real Property Tax Services office, the subject parcels are identified as Tax Map Numbers
018.-06-09.1 (Parcel 1), 018.-06-07.1 (Parcel 2), 018.-06-08 (Parcel 3), 018.-06-06.1
(Parcel 4), and 018.-06-07.2 (Parcel 5).
1.1 Purpose
The ESA was perfoimed in accordance with SWRNA protocols and procedures, and in
general conformance with ASTM E 1527-00 recognized standards of practice. The
primary purpose of the Phase I investigation is to determine if there is obvious
environmental impact to the property, based on observations from a non-intrusive
inspection of the subject parcel and the immediately surrounding area.
1.2 Methodology
In completing Phase I Environmental Site Assesments, SWRNA utilizes the following
general methodology which includes the following tasks:
• Site Reconnaissance is performed which includes an inspection of the property,
buildings interior areas, and interviews with available owner(s) and/or site personnel.
These activities determine if there is any obvious visual evidence of environmental
impacts, and identifies current activities on the site.
• Records research is conducted to ascertain whether past uses of the site or activities
on the property could have had a potential environmental impact.
• Infonnation concerning adjacent properties is also reviewed to determine if off-site
activities could impact the subject property, or if the subject property could be
impacting neighboring sites.
• Environmental database records, which comply with ASTM 1527-00 specified search
distances, are obtained and reviewed to determine if any documented spins or
activities related to the generation or storage of hazardous waste have occurred on the
site.
• Current and pnor ownership of the tax parcel(s) is reviewed to assist m better
determining historic uses of the property.
- 3 -
SECTION 2 - SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New
York. A SWRNA representative inspected the parcels on July 6 and July 7, 2005.
Weather conditions consisted of clear skies and a temperature of approximately 85
degrees Fahrenheit on July 6, and overcast skies with a temperature of approximately 75
degrees Fahrenheit on July 7. Ground surfaces at the site were dry during both site
inspections. Environmental Assessment Questionnaires were completed by Ronald
Burlingame (Parcel 1), Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3), Gordon Schutzendorf (Parcel 4),
and Richmond Lcnckcr (Parcel 5) and are included as Appendix I. A Questionnaire was
provided to Mr. David Mueller (Parcel 2), however was not returned as of the writing of
this report.
Site diagrams (Figures 2 and 3, respectively) are included in this report to assist in
describing the general layout of the site and/or significant land features. The site consists
of four (4) buildings totaling approximately 20,000fl:2 in aggregate, and one (l) self
service car wash facility. The site is currently used for a dry cleaning facility (Parcel 1)
retail store (Parcel 2), medical office space (Parcel 3), professional office space (Parcel
4), and a car wash facility (Parcel 5),
Land use surrounding the site consists of a mix of commercial office, retail, and
residential homes. Immediately adjoining property uses include West Genesee Street;
then commercial businesses (North), offices and residential homes (South), Limestone
Creek (East), and retail and restaurant businesses (West).
The subject site is generally flat, with a slight change in elevation from north (higher) to
south (lower). A 1977 United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7 .S~minute series
topographic map of the Syracuse East quadrangle reveals that the site elevation is
approximately 435~fcct above mean sea level (figure 1). Presumed hy<lrogeologic and
groundwater flow direction could not be discerned from surficial indicators.
- 4 -
SECTION 3 - HISTORICAL AND AGENCY REVIEW
Information regarding historic uses of the subject property was obtained from research
conducted at the Onondaga County Real Property Tax Services office, Onondaga County
Court House, and the Town of Manlius Historical Society. Review of these documents
indicate that p01iions of the site have been developed since at least 1874.
3.1 Aerial Photographs
Historic aerial photographs from 1959, 1966, 1978, 1988 and 1995 were reviewed. The
1959 and l 966 photographs show structures on the northwest portion of the site (Parcels
l and 3) which are likely the fonncr gasoline station (Section 3.4 Fire Insurance Maps)
and the current dental office. The 1978 photograph shows the gas station building (Parcel
1), the dental office (Parcel 3), and the Grimaldi & Harig office building (Parcel 4).
Additionally, there appears to be two structures on the northeast portion of the site,
adjacent to the Limestone Creek. The nature of these buildings could not be determined
from review of the aerial photograph. Photographs from 1988 and 1995 show all of the
existing structures on the site.
3.2 USGS Topographic Maps
USGS Topographic Maps from 1898, 1938, 1943, 1957, and 1977 were reviewed. The
maps show consistent development over time with no notable changes in topography.
3.3 Historic kfaps and Documents
A 1874 Sweet's Atlas of Onondaga County was reviewed and revealed that residential
homes were present on the site at that time. The residential structures were shown to have
been owned by C. Fitch and D. Dunhain. The Atlas also shows that a Police Station was
located on the site as well as a Carriage House in the northwest corner of the property. A
photograph of what appeared to be Elisha Stedman's Carriage House was reviewed at the
Manlius Historical Society. The year of the photo is unknown, however deed records
- 5 -
indicate that Elisha Stedman owned the parcel that would have contained the Caniage
House until 1917 (Section J_6 Prior Owners).
A document titled Souvenir Book of Fayetteville dated September 5, 1921, published by
Manlius Publishing Company, was reviewed. The document contained an advertisement
for Morgan H. Lewis Garage on the Genesee Turnpike. This could possibly be the auto
repair garage shown on the 1919 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map (see Section 3. 4). The
document also contained an advc11isement for Coal and Wood sales by James P. Kinsella
of Fayetteville. Whether there is a relationship between these operations and John
Kinsella, who owned Parcel 2 during the l 950's, is unknown.
3.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1904, 1909, 1919, 1929, 1943 and 1951 were
reviewed. Maps from 1904 and 1909 show the WM Morrison Glove and Mitten facto1y
on the nm1hwest portion of the site and Carl Graham Carriage Repairing on the northeast
portion of the property. The 1919 Map shows the Fire Depm1ment near the center of the
site, with a building labeled "Transformer Ho" (Transformer House) adjacent to it. The
map also shows what appears to be an auto repair facility located on the northeast portion
of the site and a clearly labeled gasoline tank. is located next to (not1h) the facility. The
1929 Sanborn Map shows a gasoline station with four gasoline tanks on the no11hwest
corner of the site. The Transformer House is also shown on the 1929 map as well as an
automobile sales facility located on the northeast portion of the site. The map of the
automobile facility shows two clearly labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building.
Also, a building labeled "Battery Service" is located near the west portion of the
property. A 1943 Sanborn Map shows the previously mentioned gasoline station
(northwest portion of site), transformer house, and battery service building, however the
automobile facility on the northeast corner of the site is no longer present. A smaller
building labeled "Vac." (vacant) is located in place of the northeast corner auto facility.
The 1951 Sanborn Map shows the northwest corner gasoline station (showing two clearly
labeled gasoline tanks on each side of the building), battery service building, transformer
house, and an additional gasoline station occupying the vacant building formerly on the
northeast portion of the property.
- 6 -
3.5 City Directories
City Directories dating back to 1963 were reviewed. Directories from 1963, 1967, 1972,
and 1977 identify 129 West Genesee Street (Parcel l) as Launt Brothers Shell, Village
Shell, Village Shell, and Fayetteville Shell respectively. Directories from 1987 and 1992
identify the same property as Fayetteville Cleaners. No other parcels within the subject
site area were identified in the City Directories and no adjacent business were identified
who's activities could potentially have impacted the subject prope1ty.
3. 6 Prior Ownership
Parcel 1, located at 129 West Genesee Street, is currently owned by the Burlingame
Family Limited Partnership, who were conveyed the property in 1994 by Richard Casale
and Roderick Burlingame. Messrs. Casale and Burlingame acquired the property from the
R&L Family, Inc. in 1993 who had acquired the property from Shell Oil Company in
1979. According to deed records, Shell Oil owned the parcel in whole or in part since
1929, when they purchased it from Stewart Oil and Service Company, lnc. Stewart Oil
acquired the site from Orris and Lena Orman in 1922, who in turn had purchased the
property from Alice Steadman in 1919. Elisha Steadman owned the properly from 1892
to 1917. Additionally, according to deed records, it appears that Shell Oil also acquired
adjacent properties formerly owned by David and Mary Boyd (l 905), Joseph and
Elizabeth Staple (1905), Nettie Wilcox (1930), Mary Wickes (1930), and Harold
Sherman (1958),
Parcels 2 and 3, located at 125 Genesee Street and 107 Highbridge Street, appear to have
a history of common ownership. The parcels arc owned by David Mueller (Parcel 2) and
Dr. Richard Sherwood (Parcel 3) respectively. David Mueller and Dr. Sherwood acquired
their parcels from 107 Highbridge Corporation in 1995 and 1990 respectively. Prior to
that, the properties were owned by Edmund Coughlin, Philip Coughlin, and Ralph Ross,
who formed 107 Highbridge Corp in 1965. Records indicate that Coughlin, Coughlin and
Ross were tenants of James House who sold them the parcels in I 960. Deed records show
that John J. Kinsella owned the property directly east (Parcel 2) of the Shell Gasoline
'7'
Station in 1958, and it appears that House and Kinsella owned the parcels for sometime
up to the 1950's.
Parcel 4, located at 117 I-lighbridge Street, is currently owned by Raymond Grimaldi and
Betty Harig (Grimaldi & Harig). Grimaldi & Harig purchased the property from H.
Douglas and Geraldine Johnson in 1983. The Johnsons acquired the site from Dorothy
Lowitz, William Bcrinstein, and Donald McGinnis in 1977 who appear to have operated
under several corporate names including Coastal Securities, Inc. and Rusty Realty Corp.
Lowitz, Berinstcin, and McGinnis appear to have co-owned the property in various
capacities since at least 1969 when it was acquired from Marie A. McDonald. Marie and
Robert McDonald acquired the property from Grace Lester in 1945. Prior to that it was
owned by Elisha and Civilla Lester, who owned it since 1897.
Parcel 5, located at 100 Fitch Street, is currently owned by Raymond F. Lenckcr Living
Trust, who acquired the site from Limestone Car Wash, Inc. in 1999. Limestone Car
Wash purchased the prope1iy from Beacham Corporation in 1991. Beacham Corporation
acquired the property from 107 Highbridgc Corporation in 1987 (who appear to have
owned this parcel in addition to Parcels 2 and J). As previously discussed in this report,
107 Highbridge Corp was formed by Coughlin, Coughlin, and Ross in 1965, and these
deed records further confirm the company's formation. Coughlin, Coughlin and Ross
purchased the site from the estate of Leon Abbott in 1964. Abbot owned the property
since 1939 and prior to that the site was owned by Edgar and Florence Dygert. Florence
Didier and Andrew Didier owned the property since 1901. The property appears to have
been in the Dygert and Didier families since 1891.
SECTION 4 - ASTM STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES,
FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
The subject property was identified as the result of a search and review of Federal and
State environmental regulatory agency databases. Parcel I (dry cleaning facility) was
identified in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database indicating
that an on-site business generates or stores hazardous waste as defined by RCRA .
. 8.
Adjacent properties were reviewed to the specified search distances stipulated in ASTM
E 1527-00 (Section 7 .2.1.1 ). Fitly-four (54) sites were identified within the specified
search radii. Thirty-four (34) could not be mapped due to inadequate address
information. Approximately eleven (11) sites were identified in the Leaking Storage Tank
(LT ANK) and Spills databases, however none are adjacent to the subject site. Only two
(2) sites identified in the LTANKS and Spills databases, 112 Brooklea Drive and 321
Highbridge Street, are at equal or higher elevation and less than l /8-mile from the subject
site. According to database records a truck fuel line broke at the Brooklca Drive site
causing a spill in 1994. The database indicates that corrective action was taken for this
incident. According to records, a spill was recorded at 321 Highbridge Street due to a
dump truck found off the road in Limestone Creek. The database indicates that the creek
was flowing too fast for recovery of the spill. Whether these identified properties have
had a direct impact on the subject site is unknown. A copy of the complete database
search report is included in this report as Appendix H.
SECTION 5 - SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS
The subject site is located on the south side of West Genesee Street in Fayetteville, New
York. A SWRNA representative inspected the parcels on July 6 and July 7, 2005.
Weather conditions consisted of clear skies and a temperature of approximately 85
degrees Fahrenheit on July 6, and overcast skies with a temperature of approximately 75
degrees Fahrenheit on July 7. Ground surfaces were dry during both site inspections. All
parcels are serviced by public water and municipal sewer systems.
5.1 Parcel I~ I 29 West Genesee Street
Exterior Observations
The Parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is cunently used by an active dry
cleaning business. The parcel contains one (1) single story, slab on grade, concrete block
building with a tar rolled roof system. The SWRNA representative was accompanied by
Kim Jones (owner representative) during site inspection. According to Ms. Jones the
property has been used as a dry cleaner since at least 1980. Prior to that, the parcel was
used as a gasoline filling station for over 50 years. The SWRNA representative inspected -9-
the perimeter of the property for evidence of fill or vent pipes. One ( 1) vent pipe was
observed adjacent to the southwest corner of the dry cleaner building (Figure 2).
Additionally, piping was observed in the ground adjacent to the vent pipe. The piping
appeared to run toward the west po1tion of the parcel, and what appeared to be a
monitoring \Vell cover was observed in the parking lot on the west portion of the site
(Figure 2). Ms. Jones did not know the nature of the vent pipe or the monitoring well, but
was aware that the site was a former gasoline station. The SWRNA representative
contacted Mr. Ronald Burlingame ( owner) regarding the nature of the pipes and
monitoring well. Mr. Burlingame did not know the nature of the vent pipe or monitoring
well and has no knowledge of a tank on that portion of the property. Mr. Burlingame also
stated that he has never removed any tanks since owning the site, but believes there may
have been a waste oil tank in this area at one time. The existence of a gasoline tank on
this portion of the prope11y coincides with tm1k locations identified on 1943 and 1951
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.
Two (2) rusted 55-gallon drums were observed adjacent to the rear (south) wall of the
building (Figure 2). The drums appeared to contain general refuse (papers, plastic bags)
and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the drums. The SWRNA representative
asked Mr. Burlingame if he had ever stored chemicals or petroleum in the drums and he
said that he had not. One (1) approximately 2-gallon container containing a dark liquid
and labeled Tctrachloroetheylene was observed near the southeast corner of the building
(figure 2). The container appeared to be intact and no staining or odors \Vere observed in
the vicinity of the container.
Interior Observations
The building area is approximately 1,000 ft2 and contains approximately five (5) rooms
including an office, reception area, storage room, boiler room, and dry cleaning area.
Three (3) approximately S~gallon containers of Tetrachloroethylene were observed near
the nor1heast corner of the building (Figure 2). The containers were staged on a concrete
floor and no staining or odors were observed relative to these containers, A large dry
cleaning machine was also observed near the northeast corner of the building (Figure 2).
Some minor surface staining was observed on the concrete floor adjacent to the machine
- 10 -
(Figure 2). Ms. Jones indicated that the machine is "state of the art" and no waste
perch!orocthylcnc (pcrc) comes out of the machine. All pcrc is cleaned and recycled
within the machine, and no disposal is necessary.
Two (2) floor drains were observed near the center of the dry cleaning area (Figure 2).
Ms. Jones indicated that the drains have been there since the building was a gas station,
however they have never been used as part of the dry cleaning operations. The S\VRNA
representative asked Mr. Burlingame about the drains and he indicated that he believes
they arc scaled (he does not know with what) and on the occasions he has had water on
the floor, the drains have not worked. An approximately 4-inch cast iron pipe was
observed corning up from the concrete floor and continuing through the ceiling toward
the vicinity of an old chimney, adjacent to the north wall of the building (Figure 2). The
SWRNA representative asked Ms. Jones and Mr. Burlingame the nature and origin of this
pipe. Both pmties indicated that they did not know the nature or use of the pipe. Mr.
Burlingame further indicated that he believes that the chimney was never active and is
part of the fayade of the former Shell gasoline station.
An approximately 10-gallon oil tank was observed in the boiler room near the southwest
corner of the building (Figure 2). The oil tank appeared to be firing a boiler which creates
steam used in the clothes pressing and cleaning processes. A compressor was also
observed in the boiler room and minor surface staining was observed on the concrete
Hoor under the compressor (Figure 2).
5.2 Parcel 2 - l 25 West Genesee Street
Exterior Observations
The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is currently occupied by a retail
cellular telephone business. The SWRNA representative was accompanies by Emma
Fleishman (store employee) during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1) single
story, slab on grade, steel sided and concrete block building with a steel roof system.
Three (3) utility owned pole mounted transformers were observed near the southwest
corner of the parcel (Figure 2). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining
was observed on the transformers or on the ground adjacent to the pole. An - ! I -
approximately 2 foot x 5 foot area of asphalt, that appeared to be recently patched, was
observed adjacent to the southeast corner of the building (Figure 2). What appeured to be
a sewer vent pipe was also observed adjacent to the asphalt patch (Figure 2). The
SWRNA representative asked Ms. Fleishman the reason for the patching, but she did not
know the nature of the asphalt patch. The SWRNA representative also contacted David
Mueller ( owner) regarding the nature of the patch. Mr. Mueller indicated that the asphalt
had been patched after the utility company had run new gas lines to the building.
Interior Observations
The building is approximately l ,OOOH2 and consists of a showroom area, warehouse, and
bathroom. The building is heated by one (1) gas fired forced air furnace. No staining was
observed on the concrete floor of the warehouse area.
5.3 Parcel 3- 107 Highbridge Street
Exterior Observations
The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and is cun-cntly used as a dental
office and residential apartment The SWRNA representative was accompanied by Dr.
Richard Sherwood during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1) two-story wood
framed building with an asphalt shingle roof system and a crawl space under the north
portion of the building. Three (3) utility O'Nlled pole mounted transformers were observed
near the south border of the parcel, adjacent to Fitch Street (Figure 2). The transformers
appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the transformers or on the ground
adjacent to the pole. Two (2) central air conditioning units were observed adjacent to the
east side of the building (Figure 2). The units appeared to be well maintained and no
staining was observed on or adjacent to the units. A third central air conditioning unit was
observed adjacent to the northeast corner of the building (Figure 2). The unit appeared to
be well maintained and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the unit.
Interior Observations
The building is approximately 2,000ft.2 with dental offices on the first floor and a
residential apartment on the second floor. The second floor apartment was not inspected
~ 12 ~
during this site investigation because access was not granted by the owner. The first floor
contains approximately 15 small rooms including an office, patient waiting area, 2
bathrooms, storage room, and several patient examination rooms. A crawl
space/basement area, which runs under approximately 1/3 of the structure, was
investigated. The crawl space had dirt flooring and contained primarily electrical and
plumbing utilities related to the operation of the office. A sump pit and sump pump were
observed in the crawl space (Figure 2). The sump pit collects groundwater that appears to
seep in through the foundation, and pumps it out onto the ground surface. The pit
contained <l inch of water and no sheen was observed in the sump pit water. An empty,
approximately I-pint container of compressor oil was observed on the dirt floor of the
crawl space (Figure 2). No staining was observed relative to the container, however Dr.
Sherwood did state that compressors were formerly located and operated from this
basement/crawlspace area. Approximately seven (7) 1-gallon cans of latex paint were
observed in the crawl space near the west wall of the building (Figure 2). The paint cans
were staged on the dirt floor, however no staining was observed related to the cans.
The first floor was investigated and operations relating to x-ray photography were
observed. Dr. Sherwood indicated that some chemicals relating to x-ray photography are
used on site as part of his dental practice. CESQG Photo Fixer Solution is used and all
\.Vaste chemicals arc picked up and disposed of by an outside vendor.
5.4 Parcel 4 - 117 High bridge Street
Exterior Observations
The subject parcel was investigated on July 6, 2005 and is currently used for a
professional office building. The SWRNA representative was accompanied by Gordon
Schutzcndorf (Owner Representative) during site inspection. The parcel contains one (1)
split level, two-story office building with brick siding and an asphalt shingle roof system,
Three (3) utility owned pole mounted transformers were observed on west border of the
parcel (Figure 3). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on
the transformers or on the ground adjacent to the pole. One (l) utility owned pole
mounted transformer was observed on south border of the parcel (Figure J). The
transformer appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the transfonner or on ~ 13 ~
the ground adjacent to the pole. Minor staining was observed on the asphalt surface near
the southern portion of the parcel (Figure 3). The staining appeared to be from tenant
vehicle parking. Four (4) central air conditioning units were observed adjacent to the
south wall of the building (Figure 3). The units appeared to be well maintained and no
staining was observed on or adjacent to the units. One (1) central air conditioning unit
was observed adjacent to the no1thwest corner of the building (Figure 3). The unit
appeared to be well maintained and no staining was observed on or adjacent to the unit.
What appeared to be a cast iron water pipe was observed in the east wall of the building
(Figure 3). The pipe was investigated fmiher and appeared to enter into a former
bathroom/kitchen area of one of the offices. A second pipe was observed at the front
(west) of the building, tmder the main entrance stairs, adjacent to natural gas lines (Figure
3). The pipe appeared to be unused and the SWRNA representative asked Mr.
Schutzendorf the nature of the pipe. Mr. Schutzenforf indicated that he said he did not
know and that the pipe had been there as long as he has been involved with the building.
The pipe was investigated further and found to enter the boiler room inside the building.
The other end of the pipe was investigated and found to be abandoned and not attached to
any utilities. The pipe appeared to be a former water pipe.
Interior Observations
The building is approximately 16,000ft2 and contains approximately ten (10) professional
offices spaces of various sizes (Figure 3). The building is heated by five (5) natural gas
fired forced air furnaces, with supplemental heating provided by electric strip heaters in
some of the office spaces. A boiler room located on the lower level (west side) of the
building was investigated (Figure 3). Two (2) sump pits containing sump pumps were
observed in the boiler room (Figure 3). The SWRNA representative asked Mr.
Schutzcndorf the reason for the sump pits and he stated that the building is in a flood
zone and the sumps are needed in case of possible flooding. Mr. Schutzcndorf indicated
that water from the sumps is discharged outside to the ground surface. No floor drains
were observed in the boiler room and no floor drains were observed throughout the lower
level. Mr. Schutzenforf said he had no knowledge of floor drains anywhere in the
building.
- 14 ~
5. 5 Parcel 5 -- 100 Fitch Street
Exterior Observations (open car wash --- no interior observations)
The subject parcel was investigated on July 7, 2005 and contains a five (5) bay, self
serve, steel sided car wash facility, with an attached garage at the east end of the bays
(Figure 2). The garage area was locked and could not be accessed during site inspection
and access was not granted by the parcel owner. The SWRNA representative was
unaccompanied during site inspection, however Richmond Leneker ( owner) arrived on
site at the end of the inspection and was able to answer questions. Each bay contains an
underground holding tank to capture debris from vehicle washing activities (Figure 3).
Mr. Lenekcr indicated that the tanks connect to the sewer system and water from the
tanks discharge to the municipal sewer. According to Mr. Leneker, debris and other
material stays in the tanks, is pumped out approximately twice per year, and is considered
road waste and therefore non-hazardous. What appeared to be a sewer vent pipe and
clean out were observed on the south side of the facility, adjacent to the center bays
(Figure 2). Mr. Lcncker confim1ed that these were used for tank clean out when
necessary.
One (1) gated and locked refuse dumpster was observed on the south portion of the parcel
(Figure 2). No staining was observed associated with the dumpster. Three (3) utility
owned pole mounted transfonners were observed adjacent to the dumpster area (Figure
2). The transformers appeared to be intact and no staining was observed on the
transfonners or adjacent to the pole.
It should be noted that Mr. Leneker indicated that the northwest portion of the parcel is
owned by the State of New York. Mr. Leneker leases this portion of the site from the
State as part of the access to the car wash facility.
- 15 -
s1,:CTION 6-RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND
CONCLUSIONS
Within the scope of the non-intrusive Phase I ESA investigation completed, eight (8)
Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) were identified:
1 Possible impacts related to historic auto repair and gas station uses on the northeast portion of the site
2 Possible impacts related to historic presence oftransfimners (PCBs) on the north portion of the site
3. Possible impacts related to 50 year presence of gasoline station (Shell Station) on the northwest corner of the site
4. Evidence of existing Underground Storage Tank (UST) on the northwest poliion of the site
5. Possible impacts from 25 year history of dry cleaning operations on the northwest portion of the site
6. Possible historic impacts from floor drains in dry cleaning (former Shell Station) facility
7. Presence and unknown historic use of piping exiting foundation of dry cleaning facility (fonner Shell station)
8. Possible impacts related to compressor operation in dirt floor crawl space area on west portion of the site
As a result of the site inspection of the subject property and research into its past uses,
additional investigation appears warranted.
SECTION 7 -LIMITATIONS
SWRNA's site evaluation was perfonned in accordance with generally accepted practices
of other consultants undertaking similar studies in the same geographical area. SWRNA
has exercised the same care and skill generally exercised by other consultants in similar
circumstances and conditions. Our findings and conclusions must not be considered
absolute ce1iaintics, but rather as our considered opinion concerning the significance of
the limited data gathered during the course of the environmental site assessment. No
expressed or implied warranty is made. Specifically, SWRNA cannot represent that the
site contains no hazardous material, oil or other latent condition beyond that observed by
SW RNA at the time of the site inspection. - 16 -
This study and report have been prepared on behalf and for the exclusive use of HDL
Property Group. This report and its findings shall not, in whole or in part, be provided to
or used by any party without written consent ofSWRNA and HDL Property Group.
- 17 -
Appendix B
Boring Logs
Depth Surf. (bgs) Elev
95.00'
0- ()5
2- S3
_3 6- 89
" ' ~ g_ , ' °2 12- 83
a
51 z ., ~
114-~ 0
"'
BORING LOG: MW-1/SB-1
Date Started _ 12116105
Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation
West Genesee St.
Time
Date Completed
Time
9.55am
12/16/05
11.00am
Fayetteville, New York Drilling Contractor Parrett-Wolff
Job No. N5025 Driller Mickey
c~ •• ,, >• Q 8£ E <c • "'~ "'
"
'
'
'
E o& -> 0.-
Sample Type
[2sJ Unrecovered
rz2:a SS Sarnp:e
C=:J NoSample
asphalt
Water Levels
_1 After Complel1on
.52.. During Dnll1ng
DESCRIPTION
1---------------0.0 moist, soft, light-medium brown. SILT, some F-C Sand
and Gravel
I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -No Recovery
l-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -moist. soft, light-medium brown, F-C SAND, Silt, trace 21.1 gravel
1-------~----------wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT and Gravel
101.3
wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand and Gravel
54.7
r---------------wet, hard, medium brown, GRAVEL. some Slit and f.C Sand
End of Bonng
Total Bonng Depth
Drillmg Melhod
Drilling Equipment
Hammer Wt /Drop
Sampling Method
Logged By
Survey
Boring Location
REMARKS
Petroleum odor noted from 6' to 14'
Took Samp!e for Lab analysis from th 6-6' interval
Water encountered at 6.5'
14ft bgs
Hollow-stern augers
tngersall Rand A wo ,-A Spl1l spoon, 2"
AM ,-A Fayetteville
northwest comer
adIacenl to W Geriesc-e Sl
MW-1 TOC Elev .. 95.00'
Cover
. Surface :_:r : . Casing
.
I,
I,
I,
I
. I,
Bentonite I, t;;;......2" PVC _ Riser
I
1---#0 Sand Pack
l--2"PVC Screen
LJJcJr2"'PVC Riser
~f.--.L--.L------------------------------~--------------------1 ~ PIO ut,tized: MiniHae 2000 calibrated to 100 Vppm isobutylene.
BORING LOG: MW-1/SB-1
Depth Surf . (bgs) Elev.
96.02'
0- S6
2~ 94
4- "
6- so
8- "
10- "
s, 12- 84
I _, 0 I
w
§ z
M a
14- 82
! 16-
E w
BORING LOG MW-2/SB-2
Date Started
Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation
West Genesee St.
Date Completed r;me
12116/05
10.30am
12/Hl/05 12.00pm
Parratt-Woift Doug
Fayetteville, New York Drilling Contractor
Driller Job No. N5025
""-•• >o s~ .0 rr.'.2.
"
,0 00
"
0.0 rn
rn 00
"
rn 00
0
I
Sample Type
~ Unrecovered
l'Z2L) SSSample
C=1 NoSamp!e
Water Levels
..Y. After Comp!et1011
SL During Onlling
DESCRIPTION
asphalt !---------
moist. stiff, medium brown, SILT, some F-C Sand, and Gravel
r---------------moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, Gravel and F-C Sand
"---------------moist, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand
----··-------------wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand and Gravel
wet, stiff, medium brown, SILT, trace F-C Sand
---------------wet, hard, light brown, GRAVEL, Silt, and F"C Sand
---------------wet, hard, light brown, GRAVEL, some F~C Sand, trace Silt
---------------No Recovery
End of Bormg
Total Boring Depth
Drilling Metllod
Onllmg Equipment
Hammer Wt /Drop Sampling Method logged By
· 113ft bgs
Survey
Boring Location
REMARKS
Took Sample for Lab analysis from ltie 6-B' interval
Petroleum odor noted from 8' lo 16'
Waler encounlerod al 9'
Hollow-stem augers
lngersall Rand A 200
NIA
Split spoon, :2" AM SIA Fayetteville west side, adjacent to
Cingu!ar and Dry Cleaners
MW-2 TOG Elev.: 96.02'
.,c--"c -Leaver
s . . ~
/
/
/ /
.. Surface . Casing
/
~r-Bentonite
/
1-2"PVC Riser
r-#0 Sand Pack
I.:- -2" PVC T- Screen
' -LD=t--2"PVC
Riser
0 •f---~-~-------------------------.-------------------1 "' PID ul1lized: MmiRae 2000 calibrated to 1 oo Vppm isobutylono
BORING LOG: MW-2/SB-2
,gf)\ S&W Redevelopment ~~,_j of North America, LLC
BORING LOG: MW-3/SB-3
Ooplh Surf
(bgs) Elev.
92.94'
0
" 2·
SC
4·
'"
6·
" 8·
"'
10-
" 12-
. eo
Date Started 12116/05
Hart Development Phase 2 Investigation
West Genesee SI Fayetteville, New York
lime Date Completed
ljme
Dnlling Contractor
8·45arn
12/16i05
10 30am
Parratt-Wo!fl
Job No. N5025 Driller Doug
"'~ •• ,. 85 &:2-
" ~-1:X
14 ~ l'x
" ~ I;'.-;
l:X
" ~ IX
"
2'
2'
Sample Type Water Levels
= Unrecovernd ..lt'.. After Completion
l2ZJ SS Sample 'iL Ourmg Dnllmg
l2ZJ No Sample
DESCRIPTION
asphalt I--- ~ - - - - - - - - - - -o.o moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT, some F"C Sand and
Gravel
t-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT and Gravel
611
!------------wet, stiff, dark brown, S!L T and Gravel
111 6
20.5
I-- - - - - - - - - - - - -wet, stiff, dark brown, SILT, Gravel, and F-C Sand
"'
r---------------wet, hard, medium-dark brown, GRAVEL, Silt, some F-C
O.S Sand
14-~ End of Boring
:, '"
14ftbgs
Hollow-stem augers
Tofal Boring Depth
Onlltng Method
Drilling Equipment
Hammer Wl /Drop
Sampling Method
Loggad By
. lngersall Rand A 200
NIA
Survey
Boring Locat,on
REMARKS
Petroleum odor throughout borjng
Took Sample for Lab analysis from the 4·6' interval
Water encountered at 5 5'
Split spoon, 2"
AM NIA Faye!!ev,lle
southwest corner
adiacenl to H1ghbridge St
MW-3 roe Elev.: 92.94'
_c·~"-=;_-Cover
.. +-surface f..-, •- Casing
" I, . I, I/ 1.., [,, i--aentonite
I.., ~J..-.2" PVC lt k_ Riser
I
~ J
'
·. JI
·I
l--#0 Sand Pack
·L1--2 .. PVC Screen
...
'
Ul=l-2"PVC Riser
a cf---~--~-------------------------------------------------' 9.- PIO ul1hze<J. Mini Rae 2000 calibrated to 100 Vppm rnobutylene
~ ,, BORING LOG: MW-3/SB-3 C
"
~ S&\V Redevelopment Total Bmrng Oeplh 16Jtbgs
BORING LOG: MW-4/SB-4 Onlling Method Hollow-stem augers
Drjlfmg Equipment lngersall Rand A zoo o! North Amenca. LLC -- Hammer Wl /Drop N'A
Date Started 12/16/05 Sampling Method Split spoon, 2"
Hart Development Time 11.40am Logged By AM
Phase 2 Investigation Date Completed 1:!/16105 Survey WA
West Genesee St. lrme 2:00pm Boring Location Fayettev,lle
Fayetteville, New York Dnllrng Contractor Parral\-Wolff east side
Job No. N5025 Dnller Mickey adJac<mt to car wash
Sample Type Water Levels
= Umecovered _,._ After Completion
= SS Sample SL During Drilling
= No Sample MW-4
Depth Surf . "~ TOC Elev .. 95.11' . , • E (bgs) Elev. >• 0- REMARKS 8-5 E ~
95.11' 0~ DESCRIPTION We • -> ~~ "' ~- ~ Cover o- S5 ' i'L asphalt Surface -;l- .
f- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' Casing
IX 0.1 moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel ";f- ' .~
I, I,
2- p 1---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I, I, 1.-sentonite
" ' moist, stiff, medium brown. SILT, some F·C Sand and I, I,
IX OS Gravel I, I,
~
C 1-2" PVC 4- S1 17: ~ --------·------ - Riser
' l'L moist, soft, medium brown, f.C SAND, some Silt, and 0.1 Gravel
IX No Petroleum odors noted
6-
" IZ ' 0,
IX Took Samp!e for Lab analysis
• from the 6-8' interval ; s 8· 82 1---- - - - - ··- - - - - - - - - - ;y. 1--#Q Sand 07
' moist stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel
°' Pack
- IX ;
10- Water encountered at 10'
" IZ ~ - - - -- - --------- -' wet, hard, medium brown-gray, GRAVEL, Srlt and F-C Sl
IX 00 Sand
' -2" PVC . Screen
12- . ea ~ "
IX 0.0
14- '1
~ ~ -------·------ -' wet. hard, medium brown-gray, GRAVEL, some Silt and
1' I
0.2 F-C Sand .
16- lX 2" PVC End of Boring Riser
PID ut,l1zed· M1niRae 2000 calibrated lo 100 Vppm Isobutylene.
BORING LOG MW-4/SB-4
-
/~\ S&W Redevelopment '--.~--1 of North America, LLC
BORING LOG: MW-5/SB-5
~ 1-,
E " a C
" ~
I ~
Depth Surf .
(bgs) Elev. S6 00'
o- "'
2- 94
4- 92
10- 86
°i 12~ 84
'" " " [; ]
i 14~ , w ,_ 0
"'
Hart Development Phase 2 lnvestigat1on
West Genesee St.
Date Started
Time
Dale Completed
T,me
12/16105
1215pm
12/16105
2:ll0pm
Parratt-Wolff
M;ckey Fayetlev1Jle, New York Dnlling Contractor
Driller Job No. N5025
Sample Type Water Levels
= Umecovered _y_ Affor Complelion
l2ZI SS Samp:e SL During Dnlling
l2ZI No Sample ~-•• >v D~ Do '[1--------------'---------------1 •c <Y~
o~ a:::G
6
00
12 00
00 rn
00
0
00
00
18 00
DESCRIPTION
moist, stiff, dark brown, topsoil and grass ---------------moist, stiff, dark brown, SILT and F-C Sand
---------------moist, stiff, medium-dark brown, SILT, some F-C Sand and Grave!
----------------moist, stiff, medium·dark brown, SILT, some F·C Sand, trace Gravel
I----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet. stiff, medium brown, SILT, F-C Sand, and Gravel
i---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -No Recovery
i---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet, stiff, medium brown-gray, S!L T and Gravel, some F-C Sand
I-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wet stiff, light-medium brown, SILT, Gravel and F-C Sand
End of Boring
Total Boring Depth
Drillmg Method
DrWing Equipment
Hammer Wt /Drop
Sampling Method
Logged 8y
Survey
Boring Locatmn
REMARKS
16ft bgs
Hollow-stem augers
lngersall Rand A 200
.NIA
Split spoon. 2"
AM NIA Fayetteville
east side southeast of car wash
MW-5 TOG Elev .. 96.00'
_rc-,-~cover
-, .
':t, Surface r- ~ Casing
, v /V V [/c......Benton1te
V ~'----2"PVC ~ f( Riser
• Took Sample for Lab analysis at the 4·6' interval
i,: ·I-·
' No Petroleum odors noted
Waler encountered at 7-5'
' '
I -
I
-#0 Sand Pack
1---2" PVC Screen
Lllcf--2"PVC Riser
0 of--~--~------------------------------~--------------------< g, PIO utilized: M1niRae 2000 calrbrated to 100 Vpprn isobutylene.
BORING LOG: MW-5/SB-5
Appendix C
Laboratory Analytical Results
~ PARAD_!9M EIIV!flOH/l'IEHTAL StRV!C£S. IMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 • 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
IHalocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon T etrachtoride Chloroethane Chloromcthane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-0lchloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroelhene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dich!oropropene trans-1 ,3-Dich!oropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1.2,2-T etrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1.2-T rich!oroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vin"I chloride
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 S8-1 NIA Soil
Results in ug I Kg ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-::11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4
ND<: 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND<11.4 NO< 28.4
ND< 11.4 ND-:: 11.4 ND<: 11.4 ND<11.4 NO< 11.4 ND< 11.4 ND< 11.4
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14460
Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005
!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene ND< 11.4 Chlorobcnrnne NO< 11.4 Ethylbenzene ND< 11.4 Toluene N0<11.4 m,p-Xylene ND< 11.4 o-Xylone NO< 11.4 Styrene ND< 11.4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.4 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.4 1,4-0ichlorobenzene ND< 11.4
IKetones Results in ug / Kg Acetone ND< 56.8 2-Butanone NO< 28.4 2-Hexanone ND< 28.4 4-Methyl-2-pentanonc ND< 28.4
!Miscellaneous Results in ug I Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 28.4 Vinyl acetate ND< 28.4
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33791.D
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect
ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Slgnature:
TM; report is par! of" m.,11,pge <:locomenl ao] should only be evJlu~led in ilS enlitely. Chain ol Custody prov,des add,1,0.~al inlo,mal,M. ,nciud1n9 co<rp/•ance ,.,lh sarf\'.)!" CGnd,lioo tequ11crnenl> upon ,ec~,pl. 054265V1 XlS
~ PARAD_!9M UIYIROHIIIUITAlSERVICES. lMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 • 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
IHatocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroethane Chloromethane 2-Ch!oroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-0ich!oroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-0ichtoropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3·Dichloropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1,2.2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-T richloroethane T rlchloroethene Trlchlorofluoromelhane Vinvl chloride
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 SB-2 NIA Soil
Results in ug I Kg ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2
ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 25.6
ND< 102 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 ND< 10.2 NO< 10.2 NO< 10.2 ND< 10.2
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14461
Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 1212712005
l&iiJnatics Results in ug I Kg Benzene ND< 10.2 Chlorobenzenc NO< 10.2
Ethylbenzene ND< 10.2 Toluene ND< 10.2
m,p-Xylene ND< 10.2
a-Xylene NO< 10.2
Styrene NO< 10.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene NO< 10.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.2
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.2
IKetones Results in ug / Kg Acetone ND< 51.1
2-Butanone NO< 25.6
2-Hexanone ND< 25.6
4-Methy!-2-pentanone NO< 25.6
!Miscellaneous Resul\s in ug / Kg
Carbon disulfide ND< 25.6 Vinyl acetate ND< 25.6
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B O,:ita File: V33792.D
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Signature: echnical Director
Th>S repo,t ,s p3rt er" m,11,page docu nl and shOtJld o,,ly be evalu~lea ,n ,ts entirely Cha,n ol Cuslody pro"des adM10.oal 1nlerma1,on, mclu1,ng compl,ance l'AI, sa())l'e umd,t;cn r~quiremenls upoo rece,pl 05~)66V2 XLS
179 lake Avenue Rochester. New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 64 7 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Cllent Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
jHalocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromornethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Ch!oromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Oibromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0lch!oropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1 , 1-T richloroethane 1, 1,2-Trich!oroethane T richloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride
Hart~ Fayetteville
N5025 SB-3 NIA Soil
Results in ug / Kg ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85,2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85,2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 213 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 NO< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2 ND< 85.2
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14462
Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Dato Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005
!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene ND< 85.2 Chforobenzene ND< 85.2 Ethy!benzene NO< 85.2 Toluene ND< 85.2 m,p-Xylene ND< 85.2 o-Xylene NO< 85.2 Styrene ND< 85.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 85.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NO< 85.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 85.2
IKetones Results in ug I Kg Acetone ND< 426 2-Butanone ND< 213 2-Hexanone NO< 213 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 213
!Miscellaneous Results in ug / Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 213 Vinyl acetate ND< 213
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33793.D
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg "" microgram per Kilogram Detection limits elevated due to non-target compounds.
Signature:
lh,s reoo~ is pa~ cl a <rull,p.;ge d<lCUmenl am! should only be evJluoled ,nils enlirely Chaan o! Cuslody p,ov,des add<tmnal inlonna1,on. ,nclud,ng ccrr,pl,ance ~,,!h sa"l)le CG<1d,l,cn ,eQwtements uoon rece,pl 054266VS XlS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location; Field ID Number; Sample Type:
IHa!ocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dich!oroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trlchloroethane Trichloroethane T richlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 SB-4 NIA Soil
Results in ug / Kg ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 23.8 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 ND< 9.54 NO< 9.54 ND< 9.54
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14463
Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005
!Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Benzene NO< 9.54 Chlorobenzene ND< 9.54 Ethy!benzene ND< 9.54 Toluene NO< 9.54 m,p-Xylene ND< 9.54 a-Xylene ND< 9.54 Styrene ND< 9.54 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.54 1,3·Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.54 1,4-Dichforobenzene ND< 9.54
IKetones Results in ug I Kg Acetone ND< 47.7 2-Butanone ND< 23.8 2-Hexanone ND< 23.8 4-Melhyl-2-pentanone ND< 23.8
!Miscellaneous Results in ug / Kg Carbon disulfide ND< 23.8 Vinyl acetate NO< 23.8
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82608 Data File: V33794.D
Comments: ND deno!es Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
TIHs reporl is par1 of a m.,11,page d<X\Jment and shOuld only be cvalualed ,n ,is entirety Cho,n cfCuslody provades add,t,onal rnlonm1,on. inc;ud,ng cilmp!rance \\1ih s3rnple ccnJ-t,oo rcqwemenls u):}O<l rece,pl. 05<1260V3 XLS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
Hart. Fayetteville
N5025 SB-5 NIA Soil
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14464
Date Sampled: 12/16/2005 Date Received: 12/20/2005 Date Analyzed: 12/27/2005
IHalocarbons Results in ug / Kg !Aromatics Results in ug / Kg Brornodichloromethane Brornomethane Bromoforrn Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibrornochlorornethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1, 1-0ichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-T richloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene T richlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect
ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23
NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 20.6
ND< 8.23 NO< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23 ND< 8.23
ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
Benzene ND< 8.23 Ch!orobenzene ND< 8,23 Ethylbenzene ND< 8.23 Toluene ND< 8.23 m,p-Xy!ene ND< 8.23 a-Xylene ND< 8.23 Styrene ND< 8.23 1,2-0ichlorobenzeno ND< 8.23 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.23 1,4-0ichlorobenzene ND< 8.23
IKetones Results In ug / Kg Acetone ND< 41.1 2-Butanone ND< 20.6 2-Hexanone ND< 20,6 4-Methyl-2-pentanone NO< 20,6
IMiscel!aneous Results in ug I Kg Carbon disulfide NO< 20.6 Vinyl acetate ND< 20.6
Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V33795.D
0S4266V4 XLS
~ PARAD!9M EIIV!ROM/l!UifAl st:RVICES. !HC. 179 Lake Avenue Hoc:hester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
SemiNolatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart- Fayetteville Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14460
Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: SB-1 Dato Sampled: 12/16/2005 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 12/20/2005 Sample Typo: Soi! Date Analyzed: 12/21/2005
!Base/ Neutrals Resul{s in ug 7 Rg Base/ Neutrals Resu!!s 1n ug 7 Rg 1, Acenaphthene ND< 326 Dibenz {a,h) anthracone NO< 326 Anthracene ND< 326 Fluoranthene ND< 326 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 326 Fluorene ND< 326 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 326 lndeno (1,2,3-Cd) pyrene NO< 326 Benzo (b) fluoranthene NO< 326 Naphthalene ND< 326 Benzo (g,h,i) pery!ene ND< 326 Phenanlhrene ND< 326 Benzo {k) fluoranthene ND< 326 Pyrene ND< 326 Chrysene ND< 326 Acenaphthylene ND< 326 Diethyl phthalate NO< 326 1,2"Dichlorobenzene NO< 326 Dimethyl phthalatc ND< 815 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND< 326 Butylbcnzylphtha!ate ND< 326 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND< 326 Di-n-butyl phlhalate ND< 326 1,2,4-Trich!orobenzene ND< 326 Di-n-octylphthalate ND< 326 Nitrobenzene NO< 326 Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phtha!ate ND< 326 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND< 326 2-Chloronaphthalene NO< 326 2,6-0initrotoluene NO< 326 Hexach!orobenzene ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether ND< 326 Hexachloroethane ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether ND< 326 Hexachlorocyclopen!adiene ND< 326 Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan ND< 326 Hexachlorobutadiene ND< 326 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND< 326 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine NO< 326 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NO< 326 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND< 326 Benzidine ND< 815 N-Nitrosodimelhylamine ND< 326 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine ND< 326 lsophorone NO< 326 4-Chloroanlline NO< 326 Benzy! alcohol ND< 815 2-Ni!roaniline ND< 815 Dibenzofuran NO< 326 3-Nitroani!ine ND< 815 2-Methy!naptha!ene ND< 326 4-Nitroaniline ND< 815
!Acids Resu!ls m ug 7 Rg Acids Resulls m ug I Rg Phenol ND< 326 2-Methylphenol NO< 326 2-Chlorophenol ND< 326 4-Methylphenol ND< 326 2,4-0ichlorophenol ND< 326 2,4-DimethylphenoJ NO< 326 2,6-0ichtorophenol ND< 326 2-Nitrophenol ND< 326 2,4 ,5-T richlorophenol ND< 815 4-Nitrophenol ND< 815 2,4,6-T richlorophenol ND< 326 2,4-0initrophenol ND< 326 Pentachlorophenot ND< 815 4 ,6-Dinitro-2-methylpheno I ND< 815 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND< 326 Benzoic acid ND< 815 ELAP Nvmber 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: S27746.D
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg '° microgram pur Kilogram
Signature:
Tli,s <Ol)Ofl os f-'311 or a rr<Jlt,page doc~ment a d should o,~y be el"Elua!ed ,n ,Is enlF(cly Chain of CuslOOy pro"des add,1<o~al ioform:,t,on. ,nc1ud,ng cumpi,~nce v.•111 samp•e cor.d,l1on reQu,remenls upon reteepl 05•256$1 XlS
179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAY, {585) 647 - 3311
Semi~Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base/ Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) f/uoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phtha!ate Dimethyl phthalate Buty!bcnzy!phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphtha!ate Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexach!orobonzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nilrosodimethylamine tsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene
!Acids Phenol 2-Ch!orophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4 ,6-T richloropheno! Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methy!phenol
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 SB-2 NIA Soil
Results In ug 7 Kg ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND-c 359 NO< 898 ND< 359 NO< 359
Results in ug / Kg ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base/ Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoran!hene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthy!ene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-0ichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis {2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroani!ine 4-Nitroani!ine
Acids 2-Methy!phenol 4·Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol Benzoic acid
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
05"4266 14461
12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005
Results in ug / Kg
ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND-c 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 NO< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 ND< 359 NO< 898 ND< 898 ND< 898
Results In ug I Kg ND< 359 NO< 359 ND< 359 ND< 359 ND< 898 ND< 359 NO< 898 NO< 898
Data File: S27747.D
This report ;s pa<l ol a =lt,p;;ge <lotumen\ Ond sMuld only be cvJ!uatcd "' ,ts €nt;rely, Ctiain o! Cuslody pro,0,des addil,ooal ,nformaleoo, rnclud,ng co,~,ance ~,,lh sample cood,1,an <equ<r~menls upon recc<pl. 05426652 XLS
~ PARAD_!9M EIIY!flOHlll[HTAl SERYICU, IMC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
SemiNolatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site;
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
)Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Bem:o {a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) f!uoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phtha!ate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphthalate Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitrnso-di-n-propylamine N-Nilrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzy! alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methy!naptha!ene
!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-T richlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ElAP Number 10958
Hart- Fayetteville Lab Project Number:
N5025 SB-3 NIA Soil
Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Results in ug 7 kg Base I Neutrals NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700
16,100
Dibenz {a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene F!uorene lndeno (-J ,2 ,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-0initrotoluene 2,6-Dinilrololuene Bis (2-chloroelhy!) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy} methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroani!ine
Results 1n ug / Kg Acids NO< 1,700 2-Methylphenol NO< 1,700 4-Methylphenol ND< 1,700 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND< 1,700 2-Nitrophenol ND< 4,260 4-Nitrophenol ND< 1,700 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND< 4,260 4,6-0initro-2-melhylphenol ND< 1,700 Benzofc acid
Method: EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
05-4266 14462
12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005
Results 1n ug 7 Kg NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700
2,990 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND-.:: 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 ND< 1,700 NO< 1,700 ND< 4,260 NO< 4,260 NO< 4,260
Results m ug / Kg
ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 1,700 ND< 4,260 NO< 1,700 NO< 4,260 NO< 4,260
Data File: $27752.D
TIHs repo,1,s pan of a rnultapage document un~ slloul~ Of11y M evJlualed m M ent,,ety Cha·n GI Cu;\My /JI010des actd,\1l>'lal iflfO<l\\.:ll,o,,, ,nclud,r,g cornpt,ance ,-,th sarr,pre COf1d,l1M requ1remenls u<><m receipl 05·1266SJ XLS
~ PARAD!9M HIY!RONll!EIITAL srnvius. !ij£_ 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Semi-Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base/ Neutrals Acenaphlhene Anthracene Bonzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b} f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Bonzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Bulylbenzylphthalale Oi-n-butyl phtha!ate Di-n-ocly!phthalate Bis {2-ethylhexy!) phtha!ate 2-Ch!oronaphtha!ene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexach!orocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamino lsophorone Benzy! alcohol Dlbenzofuran 2-Methy!napthalene
!Acids Phenol
Hart - Fayettevil!e
N5025 S8-4 NIA Soil
Results m ug / Kg ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 304 NO< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304
422 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304
Results In ug / Kg
ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 759 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Dato Received: Date Analyzed:
Base/ Neutrals Dibenz {a,h) anlhracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrcne Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trich!orobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dlnitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropy!) other Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) methan 4-Brornophenyl phenyl ethe1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-0ichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroani!ine 2-Nilroaniline 3-Nitroanilfne 4-Nitroaniline
Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methy!phenol 2,4-Dirnethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Ni!rophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dlnitro-2-methylphenol Benzoic acid
2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dlchlorophenol 2,4,5-T richlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophcnol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-rnethy!phenol ELAP Number 10958 Method. EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect
ug / Kg "' microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
05-4266 14463
12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005
Results In ug I Kg
ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 NO< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 759 ND< 759
Results mug/ Kg ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 304 ND< 759 ND< 759
Data File. S27749.O
Tr.,s 1,eport is p~,1 ol a rru:tipage docurnenl and shoold only be evarualed ,nits enhrely. Cha,n or Cuslc-,;!yp<0'1des 3dd,tioMI ,nro,n"k:l:,on. ,nci~dmg ccxrvJ,ar><:e v;,!h ,mnpic cond,l,o,, requiremenls upo,"l iece,pl 05426&$4 XlS
~ PARAD!9M rnVIROHll!ENTALS!:RVICES. !HC, 179 Lake Avenue Roches1er, New York 14608 (585) 647. 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Semi~Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Cliont Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville
Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base f Neutrals Acenaph!hene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) pery!ene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthafate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phthalate Di-n-octy!phthala te Bis {2-ethylhexy!) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadione Hexach!orobutadieno N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Oibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene
!Acids Phenol
SB-5 NIA Soi!
Resulls m ug I Kg
NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 826
ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 331 ND< 331
Results in ug / Kg
NO< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 NO< 331 NO< 826
Lab Project Number: 05-4266 Lab Sample Number: 14464
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base I Neutrals Oibenz (a,h) anthracene F!uoranthene Fluorene tndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene PhenanU1rene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-0ichlorobenzene 1,4-0ichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzeno Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis {2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ethe1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroani!ine 4-Nitroaniline
Acids 2-Methylpheno! 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylpheno! 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nilrophenol 2,4-0initrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
12/16/2005 12/20/2005 12/21/2005
Resu!ls in ug I Kg
ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 826 ND< 826 ND< 826
f'.fosults m ug / Kg
2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenof 2,6-0ichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-T richloropheno! Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol NO< 331 Benzoic acid
NO< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 ND< 331 NO< 826 NO< 331 ND< 826 ND< 826
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: $27750.D
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect
ug I Kg : microgram per Kilogram
Signature:
Th,s <epOl"! ,s p;arl of a rrull1page Oocum.)n\ and sh Id only be e,alualed ,n ,ts en~rely. Ch~in of Cuslody p,ov,des add,t,onal 1nfom>3\1on. 1nclud1r,g con,pl,ance mtl, saimple cond11,on requ1re,nen1s upon ,ece,pl 054 256S~ XlS
PARADIGM CHAIN OF CUSTODY
-.,.:,}·:,:ti:),<.\M/::·: .. •),'),",\"<',,
)\CE >i ,·:}L:.:',:}~t{j{ .\,:,-:, ;\i::, .,;:.':}_};i, ·, /:c:-;,:c:-..'?\':: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1COMPANY,.._ , ;:::•1*'/J,rJ
,, i i'.. u c' I .::y, ;·>cl r1
,·, '! ;/ /\ i,- /'/ / ..,_
COMPANY: j LA~ PJi9Jf,t;T #: • (' j CLIENT PROJECT#: l(J s -'-~ J.,.~ \;':
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608 {585) 647-2530 • (800) 724-1997 FAX: (585) 647·3311
ADOR~S\,:. ; / ·, 1
,,._-, ( <,.,, ,!' ;;!--
C!TY~::;_, ,,' "''°··,- _,. (./ ~~ f STATE: , , ,.,,; .' '/
PHOiifiO-, FAX:
AOORESi:f: - (. -,
ZIP: ·c1TY: (}d)/'.-)
STATE: ZIP: TURNAR6UNOTIMEC(W0RKlNG DAYs)
PHONE: FAX: ~<:· i./-';'-j c:: -~r;A/'/ -;~l/ STD
1, n, n3 n, OTHE
r PROJECT NAME/SITE NAME;
' :-,/;.
'"'
,, ... )
1 /1 ///,•/ ,- ,·---·'---'' " 2 i --' ~ 4 '
s ,.T
6
7
8
9
10
/., I if,('
~" ·.·,-:-.,,)(''(> :,;,. ·/::;,-,. r-
0 0 M
' TIMS 0
' ' ' ' /,1, ·~C.,,,r;
/() Oe":
/tea c;M
t_::;;0.,,,,1
I , S' (' /,,,.,
ATTN:
COMME!'ifs:
0
' ' '
·,,:-
'•,,,/./
I, . .,.._ .., __ , """"-
SAMPLE LOCATION/FIELD JD
;) . ' ' . __ jl'., -- J,
< .. P, ... ~-
r J --·· '.:' ,,-- /i ' ,,
(/ c·-
,
, ... ·e· .··u· sE···o·''"ee·L···ow·· .~tt,·s'·L''"E*" , ,,, ,, ,, · ·· ·· · .. ,.lJ:I. , ., -'"~'" -.J'- . -.,,. , .. :-:.i1-,, /, •. ,, •. 1~>··./· ·:-V·.c-:.•
Sample Condition: Per NELAC/ELAP 210/241/242/243/244
Receipt Parameter NELAC Compliance Container Type:
y QJ c::::J Commllllts: N
I Preservation: I
Comments; V GJ N c::::J
Holding Time: I Comments:
V Q::J N c::::J Temperature:
Comments: ' \ (., ~, y c::::J N c::::J
ATTN:
~ Yt'-i:i o'J{NALYs)s ?Yf\i;
M
' ' ' ' '
,j
' ' .
,I
C • ; ;~
0 t Q •'( '·,; N. N. ' '·'.) "'-.°:, UT ,. • \
MA .,,-'Y- '~ 8 I ' ,j. E N °''"· \:,;: RE -::,s ("'!c:o.
R "> _, -s '
'/ V
!
I.
~.' .-i_, t
' /·-f /1,;,,·,," Ir! r· ~ 1·· ,. ' ' '' l
Sampled By ,
//'·· / / /f1 / l ,-c.-<---t'.--(.-t ....... } 1/1,A,-r:.-9(-·•"'.
Relinquished Sy
. / : ,. /I,:? L ,'., Da'tefriine
Date/Time
OUOTE/f:
REMARKS
·1 - ,· ' ' v'•>\
Received By rt\ , QateJTime ·-.~ .. ·1.,..,__ !).,,/ . ..,', {"\/,/ ~- f,·{. ,' IL-.:, ,·,.~- i \ v1 ; (~ , -~ , o-...,• d,('.J, n, I. , ,,l 1 ~, •,, , ,- ' ' -' ' ' ,, , ' ' ' , ' ,.,,) ' .,,
Received @ Lab By ,,.., Date/rime ' . ,,,
Total Cost:
P.LF,
!
'
PARADIGM LAB SAMPLE NUMBER
'H 'ii~, i,,j \::\ )
, I', I ·fu Lt I(: i,t
'Ii 'I !',,I'· -·/ '"'I J-.
C D
~PARAD~M £NVlli!ll!IIIUITAlSUY!CU. IIIC. 179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo {a) anthracene Bem~o {a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Buty!benzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phtha!ale Di-n-octylphthalate Bis {2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexach!orobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachtorocycfopentadiene Hexachlorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propy!amine N-Nitrosodlphenylamine N-Nilrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnaplhalene
!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dich!orophenol 2,4,5-Trichtorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Ch!oro-3-methylohenol
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-1 NIA Waler
Results m ug I C ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0
12.9 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Results m ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base I Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-0ich!orobenzene
1,3-Dichforobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trlchtorobenzene Nilrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroelhoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline
Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenor 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-0initrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol Benzolc acid
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C
Commen1s: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter
Signature:
05-4340 14791
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
12.4 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Resutls m ug I L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 25.0
Data File. 827866.0
ll1is report is pa,1 or a rrullipage document and should ooly be evaluated in ils enlirnly. Chain of Custody piov,ctes add1tiooa1 infmrro\100, mcludmg c~wm:e with S!>rfl'.}le co'1d,uo11 requ1remenls upoo receipt, 054340S1.XLS
~PARAD~M EHYll\OIIIIIENTAi SERVICES. IMC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
jBase / Neutrals Acenaphlhene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate Bulylbenzylphtha!ate Di-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphlha1ate Bis (2-ethy!hexyl) phlhalate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexach!orobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexachforocyclopentadiene Hexachlorobu!adiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodipheny!amine N-Nitrosodimelhylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene
!Acids Phenol
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-2 NIA Water
Results in ug 7 L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Resulls m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base / Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanlhrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dichforobenzene 1,4-Dichforobenzene 1,2,4-T richlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitroto!uene 2,6-Dinitroto!uene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!oropheny! phenyl ethe1 Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline
Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nilropheno! 4-Nilrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-melhylphenol
2-Chlorophenol 2,4-0ichtorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-T richlorophenol Pentach!orophenol 4-Chloro-3-methvlpheno! ND< 10.0 Benzoic acid ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "" microgram per liter
Signature:
05-4340 14792
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NOs; 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Results m ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Data File: S27867.O
This reµo,l is part of a n-.,it,p,ige document am:! should ooly be evaiua\ed in ,Is entirely. Chain o/ Cvs!ody prov,des add1liOMI tnfOfrrot,on. mdud,ng corrplianre "'lh w~e cond,tion requirements upon ,eceipt. 0543~0S2,XLS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number; Field Location: Fleld ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anlhracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthalate Di-n-bulyl phthalate Di-n-octylphthalate Bis (2-ethylhexy!) phthalate 2-Chloronaphlhalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyclopen!adiene Hexach!orobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine !sophorone Benzy! alcohol Dlbenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene
!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 2,4-Dichloropheno! 2,6-Dichloropheno! 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methvlphenol
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-3 NIA Water
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Results In ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10,0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Dato Analyzed:
Base f Neutrals Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene F!uorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthy!ene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotofuene 2, 6-Dinitrotoluene Bls (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!orophenyl phenyl ethm Benzidine 3,3'-Dichtorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroanlline
Acids 2-Methyfphenol 4-Methylpheno! 2,4-DimethyJphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinilropheno! 4,6-Dinilro-2-methylpheno! Benzoic acid
ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l = microgram per Liter
Signature: Bruce Hoogest ger: Te
05-4340 14793
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Results 111 ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Data Frie: $27868.D
l /11s report is part of" mu11;p3g~ <locumen1 an<! should ooiy be twaluale<I ;n Ils en\iroly. Chain of Cuslody J)fovi<les a<l<l1l10nal information. incfo<ling oorr"'11nnce ~,,th s:Jrf'f'le cood1lioo requ'<emenls up(l(l ,eceipl. 054340S3 XLS
179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX {585) 647 - 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene An!hracene Benzo (a) anlhracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) f!uoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phlhalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzylphthafa!e Ol-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylph!halate Bis (2-ethy!hexyt) phtha!ate 2-Chloronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexachloroethane Hexachlorocyc!opentadiene Hexachlorobutadlene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nftrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine tsophorone Benzyl alcohol Oibenzofuran 2-Methylnapthalene
!Acids Phenol
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-4 N/A Water
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base I Neutrals Oibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dlchlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenz:ene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrototuene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-ch!oroethoxy) melhan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Ch!orophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chloroaniline 2-Nitroaniline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroanlline
Acids 2-Melhylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nftropheno! 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-0initro-2-melhylphenol Benzoic acid
2-Chloropheno! 2,4-0ichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachloropheno! 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l "' microgram per liter
Signature:
05·4340 14794
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10<0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Results m ug / L
ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Data File: S27869.D
T/l1s rnpo,t is part of a mullipage documenl and s/lould only be evaluated ,nits enlirnty. Chain or Cuslodyp<o,l.des addet1onal inforrmlion, Including compli~nre VOlh san~e rond,1100 requsrer,,m1s upoo rece,pl. 0543~0S4 XtS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 {585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 · 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Base / Neutrals Acenaphthene Anlhracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranlhene Chrysene Diethyl phlhalate Dimethyl phthalale Buty!benzylphthalate Di-n-buty! phthalate Di-n-octylphtha!ate Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 2-Ch!oronaphthalene Hexachlorobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexach!orobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylarnine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodirnethylamine lsophorone Benz.yl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Methylnaptha!ene
!Acids Phenol 2-Chlorophenol
Hart- Faye!leville
N5025 MW-5 NIA Water
Resutls m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Resulls in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
Base I Neutrals Dibenz. {a,h) anlhracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichlorobenz.ene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenz.ene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Bis {2-chloroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Chtoroaniline 2-Nitroani!ine 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroani!ine
Acids 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4,6-Dinitro-2-methytpheno! Benz.oic acid
2 ,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-0ichlorophenot 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichtorophenol Pentachforophenol 4-Ch!oro-3-methylpheno! ELAP Number 10958 Method. EPA 8270C
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter
Signature:
05'4340 14795
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results m ug 7 L ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Resulls m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Data File. S27870.D
Th>S repo,1 is parl of a nullipage document and should only Oe eval~aled in ils entirely. Chain oJ Custody provides additioo8I mfo,malmn, inciud,og cofll)!,ance "''lh sample CQfld1t,on re~u,rements upoo rece,p\. 054340$5.XLS
~ PARAD_!9M UfflfllllllllfllTAlSUVU:U. lNC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Semi -Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville Lab Project Number; 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14796
Client Job Number: N5025 Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
Dup NIA Water
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
!Base/ Neutrals Resulls 1n ug / L Base I Neutrals Acenaphthene Anthracene Benzo (a) anlhracene Bonzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Bonzo {g,h,i) perylene Bonzo {k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diethyl phthalate Dimethyl phthalate Butylbenzy!phtha!ate Oi-n-butyl phthalate Di-n-octylphtha late Bis (2-ethy!hexy!) phthalate 2-Chloronaphtha!ene Hexachlorobenzene Hexach!oroethane Hexach!orocyclopenladiene Hexachtorobutadiene N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodimethylamine lsophorone Benzyl alcohol Dibenzofuran 2-Melhylnaptha!ene
ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 10.0
14.6
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Pyrene Acenaphthylene 1,2-Dichforobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Nitrobenzene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene Bis (2-ch!oroethyl) ether Bis (2-chtoroisopropyl) ether Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methan 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Benzidine 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 4-Ch!oroaniline 2-Nitroanlline 3-Nitroaniline 4-Nitroaniline
!Acids Resulls m ug / l Acids
Phenol 2-Ch!orophenol 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Pentachlorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methy!pheno! ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter
Signature:
ND< 10.0 2-Methylphenol ND< 10.0 4-Methylphenol ND< 10.0 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND< 10.0 2-Nilropheno! ND< 25.0 4-Nitropheno! NO< 10.0 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND< 25.0 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NO< 10.0 Benzoic acid
Method: EPA 8270C
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 12/29/2005
Results m ug I [ ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0
ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 NO< 25.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Resulls m ug / L
ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 10.0 ND< 25.0 ND< 25.0
Data File: S27871.D
Th>a repo<11s pMl t>f a mult,page docurmnl and should only be evaluoled in ,is enl,rely. Cnam of Custody provides add,tiOflal in!{)(rroliOfl, inciud,ng c()OV-,ance v.ilh sarr;c,:e COfldil>Ofl requirements upor, ,ece,pl. 054340S6 XLS
179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for NonMpotable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-1 NIA Water
IHalocarbons Results in ug / L Bromodichloromelhane ND< 4.00 Bromomethane ND< 4.00 Bromoform ND< 4.00 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 4.00 Ch!oroethane ND< 4.00 Chloromethane ND< 4.00 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 4.00 Chloroform 4.64 Dibromochloromethane ND< 4.00 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND< 4.00 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 4.00 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND< 4.00
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 79.1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 4.00 1,2-Dich!oropropane ND< 4.00 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 4.00 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 4.00 Methylene chloride NO< 10.0
1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane ND< 4.00 T etrachloroethene ND< 4.00 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND< 4.00 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane NO< 4.00 Trichloroethene ND< 4.00 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 4.00 Vinyl chloride 14.9 ELAP Number 10958 Method:
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / l "' microgram per liter
Signature:
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
I1:1enzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Melhyl-2-pentanone
!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate
EPA 8260B
05-4340 14791
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/05/2006
Results in un , L NO< 1.40 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00 ND< 4.00
Results in ug / L 295
NO< 10.0 NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Results in ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 10.0
Data File: V33959.D
lhis repOrt is par\ of a rroll1paga dowmen\ ottd shm,ld ooly be evaluailed >n ,Is entirely. Chain of Cuslody provides add11io<1al inforrmt1on. Indudrn9 cx,mpi,ance wilh S3rl\'.}le cond,lioo rcqu,remenls cip0n recte,pl 054340¥1 Xl S
179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville
N5025
Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14792
Client Job Number: Field Location: MW-2 Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:
!Halocarbons Results in ug / L [Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chtoroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 1,2-0ichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-0ichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrach!oroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per liter
Signature:
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 5.00
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m.p-Xytene o-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichtorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate
Method; EPA 8260B
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006
Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND<: 2.00
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Data File; V33928.D
This rnpo,i is part or a rn,lt,p,ige documeol ilf>d should Oflly be o,a!uated in ,Is entire!,-. Chain ol Cuslody p<o-.ides odcl11,on:,I ;oforrrutrnn, mclud,ng co,....,,:,ance "111\ sa"'"1e cOfl~>t>on
'"'l"i,cmenls upon re<;e1pl. 054340V2.XLS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX {585) 647. 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Non~potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site:
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number; Sample Type:
Hart - Fayetteville
N5025 MW-3 NIA Water
Lab Project Number: Lab Sample Number:
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
!Halocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodich!oromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroethane Ch!oromethane 2-Ch!oroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromochloromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroe\hane 1, 1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-0ich!oroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane ds-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dich!oropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1,2,2-T etrachloroethane Tetrach!oroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-T rich!oroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per Liter
Signature:
NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00
ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 NO< 5.00
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Benzene Ch!orobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene a-Xylene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 ,4-Dlchlorobenzene
!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate
Method: EPA 8260B
05-4340 14793
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006
Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Res inu /L < 10.0
ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Da!a File: V33931.D
Th,s report ts part ol a rn.litlpage dowrncn! and shoo Id only be eoaluated in Hs enlirnly. Chain of Custody provides addit;ooal fn!ormslioo, including cooy:,lwnce Y.ith sample condiliw rnquirements upon receipt. 054340V3 XI.S
~PARAD!9M UIYIRONMENTAL URYlCES. Ii&. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Non~potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville
N5025
Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14794
Client Job Number: Field Location: MW-4 Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:
IHalocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon T etrach!orlde Chloroelhane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethy! vinyl Ether Chloroform Dlbromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene trans-1,2-Dichloroelhene 1,2-Dich!oropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride
1, 1,2,2-T etrach!oroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-T richloroelhane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trich!orofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug f L :::: microgram per Liter
Signature:
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 5.00
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Bruce Hoogeste : Technical Director
Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xy!ene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
!Ketones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-nentanone
[Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate
Method: EPA 82608
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006
Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00
Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00
Data Fife: V33932.D
This rnpo<1 rn pearl of a m.;l~pcage do;:;urnenl and should only be eval"'31ed in ols en~rely. ChJin of Custody provides add1lional in!orrn:,~()(I. rnclud,ng cooµ,ance "'lh wfTl'.)lc Gond,i>On requ,rernenls upon rece,pl. 054:MOV4.XLS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 • 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Non-potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville
N5025
Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14795
Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type:
!Halocarbons Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chtoroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Oibromochloromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-0ichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cls-1,3-0ich!oropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrach!oroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichtoroethane Trichloroethene T rich!orof!uorome!hane Vinyl chloride
MW-5 NIA Water
Results in ug / L ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Analyzed:
!Aromatics Benzene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xy!ene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2-Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dich!orobenzene 1,4-Dichtorobenzene
IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
ElAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82608
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / L "' microgram per Liter
Signature:
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006
Results in ug I L ND< 0.700 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Results in ug / L NO< 10.0 ND< 5.00 NO< 5.00 ND< 5.00
L
ND< 5.00
Data File: V33933.D
Th,s ,epo,t ,s pail or a rrul~page document a~d should o,,ly tm esulu~ted in us entirely. Chain of Cuslody prov,des add1lional inforrrat,on. ,nc!ud,ng compl1ar1Ce ,'1th sa~le con01li0<1 requiremenls U!)O!l rece1pL 054340V5 XLS
179 Lake Avenue Rochester. New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311
Volatile Analysis Report for Non.potable Water
Client: S&W Redevelopment of NA
Client Job Site: Hart - Fayetteville
N5025
Lab Project Number: 05-4340 Lab Sample Number: 14796
Client Job Number: Field Location: Dup Date Sampled: Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed:
IHalocarbons Results in ug / L !Aromatics Bromodichloromethane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Ch!oroelhane Ch!orome!hane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibromoch!oromethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethane 1,2-Dich!oroethane 1, 1-Dich!oroethene cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane T etrachloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trlchloroethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trich!oroethene T rich!orof!uorome!hane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958
Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug f L " microgram per Liter
Signature:
ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 5.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Benzene Chtorobenzene Ethylbenzene Toluene m,p-Xylene o-Xy!ene Styrene 1,2~Dich!orobenzene 1,3-Dich!orobenzene 1,4-Dich!orobenzene
IKetones Acetone 2-Butanone 2-Hexanone 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
!Miscellaneous Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate
Method: EPA 8260B
12/23/2005 12/28/2005 01/03/2006
Results in ug / L ND< 0.700 NO< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00 ND< 2.00
Results in ug / L ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Results in ug / L ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00
Data File: V33934.D
Tllas rePQ<t is part of a ITTJllipage docvrren\ and shou:d only he evalualed in its enbrnly. CM in of Custody prO\;des addat,onal inf()(<Nikm, rnduding compfianCe\',111 sa~le rond,!100 rnquirernants upon ,ece,pt OS4340V6 XLS
PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY ... .. .. ... .Fir:;#be-i:ro •.•.•. :-·,·.,,_·,:·,·
·-"'•' ._,.,_~»· . lN\r<lJQE TO,. ' COMPANY:,; , . COMPANY; LAS PROJECT#:
'::_;;:\··!_,) \(_ <~·i!, Vt' / T ,:, 'JJ /i ~·-- .A// C')' - f../) c, () ,CLIENT PROJECT ft:
179 Lake Avenue Rochester, NY 14608
ADDRESS: _, , ADDRESS: 1 . ) ,C l '7< 1--t~<> ;- (r· ··" 1\ .r ,,., .~ .,:- ·- ,., J-..,· ,·, .• ,., -v' -·-·
(585) 647-2530 • (800) 724-1997 FAX: (585) 647-3311
C!TY: " STATE: ZIP: C1TY: STii:'fE: Z!P: TURNAR6LINo"TiME,-(Y/6RKI~ DAYS) ~:>\i\<-•tu<::.C /)'.! :3,/6':....
PHONE: FAX: PHONE: FAX: 3_1c:· ... "-f,,,,:; ·J< :-1 ~" ,-::,_-.;
PROJECT NAME/SITE NAME:
. ' ' ,u ,;- ,' i-,,",/ :':,;,'//(
DATE
;'). ? / 'c;"'
2
3
4
5
6 '-
7
8
9
10
TIMS
.. ., '
.h
I ,, 1,'.a
j_' < /6, , .. ,
-'t t'::,:
/· ,,... ,,c
ATTN: ,,: '! t :.:,
COMMENTS:
' 0 M
G
' , 0
' ' ' ' SAMPLE LOCAT!ON/FIELD ID
' + .X !/,,
"d-
/1", 3 [l //_ •. r,.,,_
• ,, \-'i:::..
... ·s ''S'E 'o· ··111·"s·e· "'" ~HIS '!"E" ' ' · - "-":\: JJ . . - ;:,··,.,.~,~'.:,:___ _____ .. ~~-!JI'.:· __ :~';.,..-... _.,11,, l)t_ ;,-_:,;>. Ii\·.:
Sample Condition: Per NELAC/ELAP 210/241/242/243/244
Recei_e_t Parameter Container Type:
Commsnts.,·. _______________ _
Preservation: Commoots, _________________ _
Holding Time. Comments.,·. _________________ _
Temperature: .~--·C;. Comm~ms: :., \....,
NELAC Co~iance /
y C:'.J ND /
YC::'.'.J ND /
ve::J,,NO /
/ y [ZJ N D
M
' ' '
ATTN:
' 0 MM
0' MA
s ' e M
, •. REQUESTED ANi\1.'l'SfS (,1
"--'·
·'
' ' '; j ,c s ·:::,
,,
' ' &- ;/ / ;(_ .. ,le] '/
---t I ,~., -J-1 l.1
--~,.., "':," ::,/ <: Sampled By j
Relinquished Sy
,£ Receivef!/By /~~ .....
;,/ ~/;;,," ,YU,'1:4-1'?;~·:~f
Received @ I.ab ~ /
STD
1, n, n, f<l, OTHER ~
I QUOTE#:
-\
REMARKS
-,· ,.,,;){" .f.."/
· ;· '. .. "" ~- /, ;' .,~ . ,' :. -> /"'
',./;)-./.:_\ V• , ... ,•.f •C,e'-.,.
··<'.
---
Date/Time Total Cost:
Date/Time
Date/Time ; -- -
~ !~~:::::~: ',/; _·j ,, P.I.F.
Date/T!me
PARADIGM LAB
SAMPLE NUMBER
L•
:,.
• •I 'j "-,i •
•··I -, 1° I l
- \\...'
, 1-,1••!·~
.... ,k, j /" '.../
CJ D