Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Submissions
11
#01
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Gary James and Barbara Cross Organisation name: Full name of agent: Barbara Cross Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 092741250 Postal address: PO Box 58580, Botany, Auckland Post code: 2163 Date of submission: 2-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 67 Point View Drive, East Tamaki Heights, Auckland Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
Page 1 of 2
12
#01
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
Page 2 of 2
13
#02
Page 1 of 414
#02
Page 2 of 415
#02
Page 3 of 4
2.2
16
#02
Page 4 of 417
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Robert McCallum Organisation name: Full name of agent: Robert McCallum Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0272295236 Postal address: 17 Liston Crescent, Cockle Bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 4-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Attachment 33, page7 Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are: I believe that the proposed changes when implemented will gaurantee the future current bulk and density of buildings will be in harmony with the historic village of Howick.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
#03
Page 1 of 418
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
#03
Page 2 of 419
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Robert McCallum
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Robert McCallum
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0272295236
Postal address: 17 Liston Crescent Auckland Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document " attachment 33: Prposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document " attachment 33: Prposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)
Other provisions: Extend he "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary of this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1. To limit building heights in order to protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf and thesurrounding area and to limit incongruous heights beside the Historic All Saints Church, the oldest church in Auckland. 2. Preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Plan.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
#03
Page 3 of 420
Submission date: 24 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#03
Page 4 of 421
#04
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Jemma Schonhof Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021514482 Postal address: 6B Ridge Road, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: I want to protect the views we have in howick.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
22
#04
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
23
#05
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: D. Harrison Organisation name: N/A Full name of agent: N/A Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021 040 6633 Postal address: 47 Pohutukawa Ave, Shelly Park, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
24
#05
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
25
#06
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: K. Harrison Organisation name: N/A Full name of agent: N/A Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021 040 6633 Postal address: 47 Pohutukawa Ave, Shelly Park, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
26
#06
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
27
#07
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Meg Gallagher Caldwell Organisation name: Full name of agent: Gallagher Caldwell Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0210647215 Postal address: 44 Uxbridge Road Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Parkhill Rd to Stockade Hill Property address: 44 Uxbridge Road Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Leave the existing height restriction at 8-9 metres I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
28
#07
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
29
#08
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Bronwyn Shelley ade Organisation name: Full name of agent: Robin Ade Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095354103 Postal address: 2 Cyclades Place, Shelly Park Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 2 Cyclades Place, Shelly Park Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
30
#08
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
31
#09
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Howard Colin Tisdall Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0295352969 Postal address: 54 Cheriton Road, Mellons Bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 54 Cheriton Road, Mellons Bay Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: Preserves the historic unrestricted views from Stockade Hill I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
32
#09
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
33
#10
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Diane Beverley Tisdall Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021853520 Postal address: 54 Cheriton Road, Mellons Bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 54 Cheriton Road, Mellons Bay Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: Preserves the historic unrestricted views from Stockade Hill. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
34
#10
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
35
#11
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Ian Williamson Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5343510 Postal address: 2/101 Macleans Road, Bucklands Beach , Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Reduce original height increase to that in the amended Change 4 Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
36
#11
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
37
#12
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Sally Ann Barclay Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 534 6196 Postal address: 8/23 Wellington St, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
38
#12
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
39
#13
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Ruth Elizabeth Hammond Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 535 7513 Postal address: 24 Cockle Bay Road, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: This latest Plan Change has returned the height limits to 8-9 metres, as before, in keeping with the judgement of the Independent Hearings Panel which declared that the notified Unitary Plan heights should remain in place.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Wish to keep the view shafts limited to heights of 8-9 metres. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
40
#13
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
41
#14
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Rebecca Foster Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0273117553 Postal address: 252 Mangakahu Valley Road, RD 4, Taumarunui Post code: 3994 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: No
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
42
#14
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
43
#15
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: max allen Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0273540004 Postal address: 26 fir street., Waterview., Post code: 1026 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: High rise buildings are spoiling our city, stealing our sunshine,blocking out views and creating a sense of loss of identity. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
44
#15
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
45
#16
Page 1 of 2
Full name of submitter: Fay Bellamy Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5354575 Postal address: 79B Wellington Street Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 5-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: The view from Ridge Rd is iconic and shared by everyone entering Howick, giving it its special character. It is also a reminder of how our early settlers arrived and is keeping with the village atmosphere which the local people are trying to maintain. It should not be restricted to only a few. Keep the maximum height to the 8-9 metres.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
46
#16
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
47
#17
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Tina Patricia Brown Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095341869 Postal address: 8 Cosy Place, Howick, Auckland 2014 Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: To preserve the views from stockade hill for future generations. Should not be spoilt by greedy developers. There are plenty of other places for high buildings. Let the views be for all not just for chosen few. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
48
#17
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
49
#18
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Blair Botherway Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095347016 Postal address: 41 Granger Road howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
50
#18
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
51
#19
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Shane McLennan Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0275339555 Postal address: 3/23 Liston Crescent, Cockle bay, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
52
#19
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
53
#20
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Robert pollard ainsworth Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212791433 Postal address: PO Box 39144, Howick Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
54
#20
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
55
#21
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Jayne Beacham Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0277037912 Postal address: 2/35 Pah Rd, Cockle bay, Auckland Post code: 2022 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: They were errors and must be rectified to protect the beautiful views which are a huge community asset. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
56
#21
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
57
#22
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Maxwell Allen Christiansen Organisation name: Christiansen Design Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095349447 Postal address: P.O. Box 38378, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Restrict the height limit to 8-9 metres. Property address: Stockade Hill Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation with amendments as outlined below Proposed amendments: Restrict the height limit to 8-9 metres.
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
58
#22
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
59
#23
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Judith Lindsay McDonald Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095355344 Postal address: 109D Pah Road, Cockle Bay, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Return height limit to 8-9 metres in area bounded by Crawford Reserve and Parkhill Street Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
60
#23
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
61
#24
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Sandra Scott Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0226430010 Postal address: 19E/1 Paparoa Rd. Cockle Bay Akl. Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
62
#24
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
63
#25
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Alarna Thompson Organisation name: Full name of agent: Alarna Thompson Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211089100 to Postal address: 32 Pandora place, Pakuranga Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: Please keep building restrictions in howick as they are to 8-9 metres especially around property around Stockade Hill.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I wish for corrections to the technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part). To preserve height restrictions now and in the future. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
64
#25
Page 2 of 2
No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
65
#26
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Wendy Morris Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): +6478647009 Postal address: PO Box 22, Pauanui Post code: 3546 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: I support keeping the height limit to 8-9 metres.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
66
#26
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
67
#27
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: David Edmund Smith Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5335112 Postal address: 30A Waterloo St, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
68
#27
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
69
#28
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Philippa Wheatcroft Organisation name: Full name of agent: Philippa Wheatcroft Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 64272864087 Postal address: 86 Marine Parade , Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
70
#28
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
71
#29
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: John Procter Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 535-4964 Postal address: 5 Seneca Court,, Golflands,, Auckland Post code: 2013 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
72
#29
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
73
#30
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Edward Douglas evans Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021802362 Postal address: 156 Bradbury road Howick Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: Howick has a very special view shaft that is non negotiable for preservation.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
74
#30
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
75
#31
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: ocean numan Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021 532123 Postal address: 67 Wakelin Road, beachlands, auckland Post code: 2018 Date of submission: 6-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: see map Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: The retained views make my soul sing every time I come around Stockade Hill for the last 50 years! Bollocks to the delusion that developers add value with their plan. In this case we would be robbed of a timeless piece of our heritage that generations to come will value too.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
76
#31
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
77
#32
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Annette Mary Stewart Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 022 1654 200 Postal address: 24 Beach Road,, Mellons Bay,, Auckland, Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 7-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: I support Plan Change 4: Corrections to the technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unity Pan i.e. I want the upholding of the 8-9m mixed use zone from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Road in Howick
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are: To retain the views that are an instrinsic part of Howick Village
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
78
#32
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
79
#33
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Gail Stubbins Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 537 1033 Postal address: 33A Gibraltar Street, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 7-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
80
#33
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
81
#34
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Christoph Muller Organisation name: Full name of agent: Christoph Muller Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): +6495330910 Postal address: 23A Luplau Crescent, Cockle Bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 8-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 23A Luplau Crescent, Cockle Bay Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
82
#34
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
83
#35
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: CoraJean Young Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095348623 Postal address: 55 Rodney St Howick 2014 Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 8-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Correction to retain iconic views and nature of Howick Village I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
84
#35
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
85
#36
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Catherine Maclean Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021969700 Postal address: 39 Sorrel Crescent, Bucklands Beach, Auckland Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 9-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
86
#36
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
87
#37
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Paul Lowman Organisation name: Full name of agent: Paul Lowman Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): +6421912314 Postal address: 9 Nimrod Place, Half Moon Bay Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 9-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 9 Nimrod Place, Half Moon Bay Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: To enhance protection of view shaft around Stockade Hill, Howick
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
88
#37
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
89
#38
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Brian King Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 533 7303 Postal address: 24Tainui Rd, Cockle Bay,Howick, Auckland, Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 9-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: These changes are necessary to protect all aspects of the Stockade Hill views which are so important in maintaining the character of Howick and form an important part of its historical significance
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
90
#38
Page 2 of 2
No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
91
#39
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Dorothy Elizabeth Gaunt Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 02102218079 Postal address: 9C Beach road, Mellons Bay, Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 9-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Remediation of errors in the Unitary Plan around Stockade Hill, Howick Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are: The iconic views from Stockade Hill are worthy of protection from buildings of more than 8 metres. The proposed changes remedy the earlier plan which allowed much higher buildings. - well done, Auckland Council!
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Page 1 of 492
#39
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
Page 2 of 493
#39
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Dorothy Elizabeth Gaunt
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0210 221 8079
Postal address: 9C Beach Road Mellons Bay Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Plan change 4. : Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part). Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ to limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf.and surrounding area, and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland, and second-oldest in New Zealand. 2/ preserve the current low-rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low-rise Howick Village Centre Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Page 3 of 494
#39
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
Page 4 of 495
#40
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Wayne Oakley Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 801 1416 Postal address: 26 Fieldstone Court, Northpark Post code: 2013 Date of submission: 9-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
96
#40
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
97
#41
Page 1 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Gayleen Mackereth Organisation name: Howick Ratepayers and Residents Assn Inc. Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5358098 Postal address: Howick Ratepayers and Residents Assn Inc., PO Box 38370 Howick Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Map p.7 Attachment 33 Other: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in this map Attachment 33 page 7 Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are: The correction of these errors are essential as the IHP declared that the heights in the notified UP were to be retained but a mapping error by Council failed to correctly identify these heights.Plan Change 4 addresses these errors.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: No
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to
98
#41
Page 2 of 4
make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
99
#41
Page 3 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Gayleen Mackereth
Organisation name: Howick Ratepayers and Residents Assn Inc.
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 095358098
Postal address: PO BOX 38-370 Howick 2145 Howick Auckland 2145
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones"
Property address:
Map or maps: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 6712 Howickians have signed our HRRA petition to demand that these views be preserved and that the excessive height MU buildings be rejected. These corrected heights were specified by the Judges of the AUP who decreed the notified heights remain in place for the Special Character Howick Business Overlay
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 17 October 2017
Attend a hearing
100
#41
Page 4 of 4
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
101
#42
Page 1 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Alan Mincher Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211646009 Postal address: 2/34 Devon Rd,, Bucklands Beach, Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Extend the 'Height Variation Control' to the red boundary in the map page 7, Attachment 33. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: The adverse visual impact on the approches to Howick Village from Stockade Hill.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
102
#42
Page 2 of 4
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
103
#42
Page 3 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Alan Murray Mincher
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Alan Mincher
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0211646009
Postal address: 2/34 Devon Rd, Bucklands Beach Auckland 2012
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ To limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf and surrounding area and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2/ Preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's Town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Center Plan.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
104
#42
Page 4 of 4
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
105
#43
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: David Mallowes Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0275277667 Postal address: 100 Mellons Bay Rd, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the ‘Height
Variation Control’ to the red
boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33
Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: Preserving the sea views for the approaches (from Ridge Rd and from Cook St) to Howick are vital to retain the character and ambience of the Howick main street and region.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
106
#43
Page 2 of 2
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
107
#44
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Merilyn Mallowes Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021883171 Postal address: 100 Mellons Bay Rd, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the ‘Height
Variation Control’ to the red
boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33
Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: We and our visitors greatly enjoy the sea views from Ridge Rd, Picton St and Cook St as we drive or walk to the main street through Howick. To lose these views would devalue the area and greatly diminish the beauty of Howick
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
108
#44
Page 2 of 2
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
109
#45
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Leonard William Painter Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5344487 Postal address: 18 Gibson Place, Mellons Bay , Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
110
#45
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
111
#46
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: David Morell Stevenson Organisation name: None Full name of agent: None Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): (09) 5346315 Postal address: 64A Mirrabooka Avenue,, Botany,, AUCKLAND. Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 10-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 apply the heights outlined in the map. Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
112
#46
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
113
#47
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Laraine Jane Mills Organisation name: Howick Residents and Ratepayers Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): (09)5375167 Postal address: 1A Tanglewood Place, Cockle Bay , Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 11-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): as above Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: My husband and I feel it is in the best interest of Howick to protect the views from Stockade Hill and the seaward side of Howick for everyone to enjoy now and for generations to come.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
114
#47
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
115
#48
Page 1 of 2
The following customer has submitted a Unitary Plan online submission.
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Alan Steele
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0212284568
Postal address: 5 Miller Road Mangere Bridge Auckland 2022
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules:
Property address: 164 Coronation Road Mangere Bridge auckland 2022
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Property is zoned 'School' which is not applicable.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: We have recently purchased 164 Coronation Road and intend to restore it and live in it as a house.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 11 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
116
#48
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
117
#49
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Christine Keeling Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5339408 0211255785 Postal address: 18 Tanglewood Place, Cockle Bay, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 11-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust the height variation control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre and Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the Height Variation Control to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33. Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? Yes
118
#49
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
119
#50
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Terry Turner Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 534 7443 Postal address: 39 Gillett Pl, Botany Downs Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 11-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Extend the 'Height Variation Control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined on the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
120
#50
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
121
#51
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Sharon Fisher Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0210595436 Postal address: 6 The Glebe, cockle Bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 11-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: Plan Change 4 Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
122
#51
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
123
#52
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Marie Hillary. Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 5354471 Postal address: 80 Beach Rd,, Howick., Auckland. Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Plan change 4 Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
124
#52
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
125
#53
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Mark Hillary. Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 5354471 Postal address: 80 Beach Rd., Howick. Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Plan change 4 Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
126
#53
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
127
#54
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Lisa Gaylene Talbot Organisation name: Mrs Full name of agent: Lisa Talbot Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021868060 Postal address: 9 Chilton Place, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Used Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'height variation control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
128
#54
Page 2 of 2
No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
129
#55
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Rhys Talbot Organisation name: Mr Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0223509767 Postal address: 9 Chilton Place, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Used Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'height variation control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
130
#55
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
131
#56
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Liam Rhys Talbot Organisation name: Mr Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 5347955 Postal address: 9 Chilton Place, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Used Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'height variation control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
132
#56
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
133
#57
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Anna Elizabeth Talbot Organisation name: Miss Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 5347955 Postal address: 9 Chilton Place, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Used Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'height variation control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
134
#57
Page 2 of 2
No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
135
#58
Page 1 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Jennifer Pitches Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095328075 Postal address: 12 Cockle Bay Road, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 12-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Hwick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Extend the 'Height Variation Control' to the red boundary in the map on Pg 7 Attachment 33. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
136
#58
Page 2 of 4
No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
137
#58
Page 3 of 4
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Jennifer Pitches
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 095328075
Postal address: 12 Cockle Bay Raod Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for HOwick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones.
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1) to limit building heights in order to protect the current expansive view of the Hauraki Gulf andsurrounding area and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2) to preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's Town Centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Centre Plan.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
138
#58
Page 4 of 4
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
139
#59
140
#59
141
#59
142
#60
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: LISA COETZEE Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0278086148 Postal address: 15 Howe Street, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Stockade Hill, Howick, Auckland 2014 Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes
The reason for my/our views are: Eighteen metre high buildings in the Mixed Use zone from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd would have totally blocked our magnificent views as we enter Howick round Stockade Hill. This latest Plan Change has returned the height limits to 8-9 metres, as before, in keeping with the judgement of the Independent Hearings Panel which declared that the notified Unitary Plan heights should remain in place.
I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
143
#60
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
144
#61
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Christopher John irwin Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021927668 Postal address: 61bleakhouse Rd, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Blocks view from stockade Hill howick I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
145
#61
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
146
#62
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Glendale Van der Maas Organisation name: N/a Full name of agent: N/a Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5344236 Postal address: PO Box 39576, Howick - 2145, Auckland Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: The Citizens of Howick have made it quite clear that retaining the view shaft and seascape is essential to the character of this historic village, and the reason we all moved to live here decades ago I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
147
#62
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
148
#63
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Emma Jeffery Organisation name: Full name of agent: Emma Jeffery Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021778080 Postal address: C/- 1/75 Evelyn Road , Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Seaviews from Stockade Hill entering Howick must be protected. No commercial or residential buildings should be permitted that block any part of the existing view. There are many other spots that can be used that don't have this far reaching and long term impact of the streetscape, community pride and key attraction features of the village I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
149
#63
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
150
#64
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Andrea Blondel Organisation name: Full name of agent: Andrea Blondel Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0274332216 Postal address: 23b Luplau Crescent, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: You have got to be joking that you would allow ANY house/building to block the view of the sea on entry to Howick village from the top of Picton St/Stockade Hill. How dare you? You are ruining the character of the area for the sake of a few dirty dollars from dirty developers :( UNBELIEVABLE I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
151
#64
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
152
#65
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Shona Macleod Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212938688 Postal address: 4 Seymour Road Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
153
#65
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
154
#66
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Brooke williams Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0210521197 Postal address: 32b selwyn road, Cockle bay Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: The view by stockade hill is priceless and it's worth keeping for the generations to come and all to enjoy I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
155
#66
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
156
#67
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Agnes Thomas Organisation name: Full name of agent: Agnes Thomas Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 099401532 Postal address: 2/42 Howe St Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 2/42 Howe St Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
157
#67
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
158
#68
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Sofia Ang Organisation name: Full name of agent: Sofia Ang Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211067450 Postal address: 27 Windsong Court Post code: 2013 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 27 Windsong Court Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: No If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
159
#68
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
160
#69
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Ethan Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211620713 Postal address: 7/55 cook street, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: Dont ruin our shit with buildings that howick cant even accommodate, howicks already busy enough s it is with the growing number of immagrant I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: No If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
161
#69
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
162
#70
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Tessa Clarke Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212609514 Postal address: 46 Parkhill Road Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Ruining the stunning view we are blessed to have is a huge mistake. Don't ruin howick! I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
163
#70
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
164
#71
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Amy Morrissey Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095370670 Postal address: 160 Mellons Bay Road, Howick, Auckland, Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 13-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: I would like the height restrictions on Howick Village to return to 8-9m.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I want the view coming into howick to be preserved I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
165
#71
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
166
#72
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Ryan Anthony Mason Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212463335 Postal address: 126a wellington street, how sick, auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: No If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
167
#72
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
168
#73
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Shanika Liang Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 02041305628 Postal address: 139 Tasman street Post code: 6021 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 139 Tasman street Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
169
#73
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
170
#74
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Lorraine Wilson Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 02102437147 Postal address: 24 Lilybank Crescent, East Tamaki, Post code: 2013 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: We recently moved after living in Bucklands Beach for more than 25 years. During that time (and still today), it is very special & uplifting to view the sea as I drive into the unique Howick Village. It connects the history of Howick to the present. I believe this sea view must be protected for future generations for historic, aesthetic and spiritual reasons.. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
171
#74
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
172
#75
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: michelle hull Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212081424 Postal address: 41a Bleakhouse road, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
173
#75
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
174
#76
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Maddison Palmer Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212132790 Postal address: 46 Neilson Street Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Keep stockades view!! I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
175
#76
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
176
#77
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Robert James Voulk
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021 1185429
Postal address: 141 Bleakhouse Rd Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Reduction of building heights from 18 Metres to previous limits of 8-9 metres - mixed use commercial and apartments . affecting views from Stockade Hill. A public place.
Property address: parts of Bleakhouse Rd, Mellons Bay Rd and Picton Street
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: Viewshaft and open aspect of views out to the sea from this important historical monument to NZ soldiers is of considerable heritage value. Dating back to the days of the Fencible regiment stationed in Howick. It is also a quiet public place for relaxation and contemplation of the public. Further the view out to sea on entering Howick village from Ridge Rd is truly magnificent and worthy of protection for the benefit of all residents and visitors to Howick
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 14 October 2017
Attend a hearing
177
#77
Page 2 of 2
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
178
#78
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: David Grant hand Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5358497 Postal address: 137 Cook Street Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I wish the for the replacement of the 18 meter limit blocking our views entering Howick , to be returned to the old 8 - 9 meter height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Road. It is only the greedy few that wish to have this limit increased at the expense of the general public whom so value this amenity. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
179
#78
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
180
#79
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Dudley Arthur Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 07711 611323 Postal address: 23 Elmsway. , Ashford, Middx, , , UK Post code: TW15 2SH Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Stockade Hill views Property address: Map: Other: The provision of housing is important but so too is the quality of one's environment. This includes visual surroundings, so height restriction are paramount.
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I have friends and close relatives in the area whose lives are being blighted by the proposals to increase building heights. I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
181
#79
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
182
#80
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: J.L.Hinson Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 09 5341276 Postal address: Po BoX 39173 , Howick , Ak 2145 Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 14-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
183
#80
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
184
#81
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: James Henry Bernhard Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0274779508 Postal address: 10 Liam Place, Half Moon Bay, Auckland Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: The return to the old 8-9 meter height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd in Howick in order to preserve the natural views of the Gulf.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I support the return to the old 8-9 meter height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd in order to preserve the natural views of the sea. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
185
#81
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
186
#82
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Amanda Weaver Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 5344961 Postal address: 26 Hattaway Ave, Bucklands Beach Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: From Crawford Reserve to and including Parkhill Road
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Views should be enjoyed by everyone I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
187
#82
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
188
#83
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Grant Robertson Organisation name: Mr. Full name of agent: Grant Robertson Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0411577121 Postal address: Unit 23, 172 Barrier Reef Drive Post code: 4218 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Stockade Hill and surrounding area view. Property address: Howick Map: Other: Pleas retain
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Stockade Hill, from top to bottom and around in Howick, needs protection from those who would commercialise it for their own private benefit, to the loss and detriment of this national heritage. Once this area and view has been allowed to be devoured by greedy commercial interests, not protected for perpetuity, for ourselves and our children and our future, it can never be recovered. Do not let this happen. Please, protect, with genuine interest, this historic area for us all to enjoy into the future. This is our past, our present and our future. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
189
#83
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
190
#84
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Daniel Lucas Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021978752 Postal address: 100 Beach Road, Mellons Bay, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
191
#84
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
192
#85
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: PENNY HENNING Organisation name: Full name of agent: PENNY HENNING Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): +6495354467 Postal address: 17 COVINA PLACE, SOMERVILLE Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: We support the return to the old 8-9 meter height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd. Howick Village is of historical significance and views to the sea ward side should not be obstructed. returning heights next to All Saints Church and along Wellington St to the original heights. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
193
#85
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
194
#86
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Cheryl Barnett Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021 259 0108 Postal address: 2/36 Clydesdale Ave, Somerville, Manukau Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 15-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): As above Property address: Map: Other: .
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I want the height restriction on views by Stockade Hill be put back to 8 metres. We cannot, cannot lose this view. It is historic I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
195
#86
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
196
#87
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Peter Barry Organisation name: Pest Management Consultancy Ltd Full name of agent: Peter Barry Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021610104 Postal address: 11 Bretton Lane, Mellons Bay, Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: 11 Bretton Lane, Mellons Bay, Howick Map: Other: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I want to protect the views of the Hauraki Gulf from Stokade Hill and the road approach along Ridge Road into Howick Village. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
197
#87
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
198
#88
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Barbara & Jon Marwick Organisation name: Frau Full name of agent: Barbara & Jon Marwick Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095370880 Postal address: 13 Bledisloe Street, Cockle Bay, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
199
#88
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
200
#89
Page 1 of 1
To whom it may concern Re PC 4: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) I wish to support Plan Change 3 creating a new viewshaft protecting views from the top of Stockade Hill. I also support the Plan Change 4 to change back to the 8 to 9 metre heights as shown on the Howick Special Character Business overlay. Tricia Burns 75 Millen Ave Pakuranga
201
#90
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Shahina Oberoi Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0210402713 Postal address: 35 Fortunes Rd,, Half Moon Bay,, Auckland Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Replacement of 18 meter limit blocking our views entering Howick Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: It's a landmark. I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
202
#90
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
203
#91
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: bernarda sheppard Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): (09) 535 5311 Postal address: PO Box 39019, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): "Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones" Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'Height Variation Control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 attachment 33. Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission?
204
#91
Page 2 of 2
No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
205
#92
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: David Sheppard Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): (09) 535 5311 Postal address: PO Box 39019, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2145 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the 'Height Variation control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachement 33. Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
206
#92
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
207
$ubrnission on a publicly notified proposal for policystatement or plan change or variationClause 6 ofSchedule 1. Resource ManagementAct 1991FORM 5
Send you r subm ission to u nitarypla n r0aucklandqou nci l.gavLnz orpost to :
Attn: Planning TechnicianAuckland CouncilLevel24, 135 Albeft StreetPrivate Bag 92300Auckland 1142
Submitter detailsFull Name or Name of Agent {if applieable}
&r-gcktr#fid ,r'', ".
C**ncil
For oifice use only
Submission No:
Receipt Date:
Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms(FullName)
Organisation Name (if submission is made on behalf of Organisation)
Address for service of Submitter
Telephone:
Contact Person: (Name and designation, if applicable)
$cgpe of submissionThis is a submissicn on the following
Pian ChangeA/ariation Number
Plan Change/v*ariation N am e
The specific provisions that rny submission relates to are:(Please identify the specific pafts of the proposed plan change / variation)
oq 531. rds k/Emaii: raerrle- d. lone- @ 4.o. c;o" rVJ,
Plo^ Cho q* $. Hoeur'ck -Tb*n Cenlnu\\_l
PC 4: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the AucklandUnitary Plan (Operative in part)
PIan provision(s)
OrProperty Address
ArMap
ArOther {specifv)
hlo,^.,,'c k *Tb;^ Ce,-), e
Ct..ec*r"or. 1o rn e{fors
SubmissionMy submission is: {Pfease indicate whether you support or oppose the specific Brovisions or wish to have tbemarnended and the reasons for your views)
I support the specific provisions identified abo're EI oppose the specific provisions identified above I! wish to have the provisions identified abcve amended yes f fto 6The reasons for my views are.
,'efe. *f*a.L,.^u#
#93
208
{continue on a separate sheet if necessary}
I seek ihe following decision by Council:
Accept the proposed plan change / variation
Accept the proposed plan change / variation with amendments as outlined below
Decline the proposed plan change / variation
lf the proposed plan change / variation is not declined, then amend it as outlined below.
dnnn
I wish to be heard in support of my submission
I do nr:rt rr,iish to be heard in support of my subrnission
lf oihers similar submission, I will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing
t /* O"l 20 t-?Date
authorised fo sigri an behalf of submitter)
TWI
Notes to person making subrnission:lf you are making a submission to rhe Environmental Protection ,Authority, you shculcl use Form 168.
please note that yoL;r address is requirecl tc be macle publicly avarlable under the Resource fulanagement Act
1gg1, as any further submission supporting or opposing this submission is requtred to be forwarded tc you as well
as the Council.
!f you are a person whc could gain an aclvantage in trade competition through the submission. your rignt to nrake a
submission may be limited by clause 6(4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Managemeni Act 1991 .
I could t] lcould not [}.$ain an advantage in trade competition through this submission'
lf yau could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission p/ease complete the
following:I am [ / am not f directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
{a} adversely affects the environment; and
(b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
#93
209
90 Mellon's Bay Road
Mellon's Bay
Auckland 2014
16 October 2017
Attachment:
l/We unconditionally support Auckland Council's Plan Change 4 to correct technical errors and
anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Cperative in part) in respect of the Howick Town Centre and
the adjustment to the Height Variation Control for the Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre
Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones.
It is worthy of note that the wisdom and foresight of the Manukau City Planners l-5 to 20 years ago
in estabiishing Policies, Provisions and specifically Height Controls in the District Plan to prevent
intrusive out of character development and redevelopment of the iconic Howick Town Centre
enabled the Village to retain its special unique historic character. A rnatter of fact that did not
escape the notice of the learneci Judge and his expert lndependent Hearings Panel.
UWe would aiso note that apart from 'perhaps Devonport Town Centre, Howick is the only coastal
Centre in the entire Auckland Region not to have lost its unique Historic Character and its maritimeviews out over the Hauraki Gulf for residents and visitors entering the Centre.
Auckiand Council's Plan change to re-establish height controls from the Manukau Plan for all sites
zoned Business Mixed Use encompassing the Town Centre is a vitally important step in preserving
the special unique character of the Howick Village for the immediate future and hopefully forgenerations to come.
Graeme & Diane Lane.
#93
210
#94
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Kate rynbeck Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0221628058 Postal address: 16 patrons road howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission
Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission
I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above
I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No
The reason for my/our views are:
I/We seek the following decision by council: Decline the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation
I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No
If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
211
#94
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
212
#95
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Tania Haime Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095709700 Postal address: 120 Pigeon Mountain Road, Half Moon Bay Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
213
#95
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
214
#96
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Lance millward Organisation name: Verdant green ltd Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211622088 Postal address: 157 aviemore drive , Highland Park , Auckland Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 16-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: Stockade hill is an historic feature of local significance. It is important in ANZAC celebrations as well as for cubs and scouts. It has significant Maori value as a pa site. The height, density, shadowing and overshadowing caused buildings of 12 to 18m would be profound. It would not be possible to integrate building volumes of this height or to mitigate the built forms. There are also significant coastal views and in an area on the edge of the coastal zone it would be very damaging to the landscape and visual values this site for residents and visitors. Ive been involved in regional mapping studies on the coromandel, waikato and central otago.i believe stro gly, based on my experience, that 12-18m is inappropriate for the local context I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing:
215
#96
Page 2 of 2
If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
216
#97
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Elizabeth Louise hamblin
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 095343917
Postal address: 161 bleakhouse road Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Lower heights
Property address: 39 ridge road howick
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Protect stockade hill and howick views....stop making these submissions so hard to follow an$ constant
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: Howick stockade hill and howick views are too important to howick and all of us ....stop stealing the views you have no right
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 16 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
217
#97
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
218
#98
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Steve Savage
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Steve savage
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0277888045
Postal address: 30 Montgomery Cres Cockle Bay Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust height variation control for Howick town centre, business town centre zone and business mixed use zones.
Property address:
Map or maps: page 7 attachment 33
Other provisions: Extend the height variations control to the red boundary in Map page 7 attachment 33
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: It causes a negative environment effect.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 16 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
219
#98
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
220
#99
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Julie Todd
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Julie Todd
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0275888633
Postal address: 30 Falstaff Place Half Moon Bay Auckland 2012
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: "Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones"
Property address: Stockade Hill
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: The view is important to the local character of the area.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 16 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
221
#99
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
222
#100
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Sandra Good Organisation name: Mrs Full name of agent: Sandra Good Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0272937642 Postal address: 96 Gills Rd, Bucklands Beach Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 17-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 96 Gills Rd, Bucklands Beach Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I object to the potential blocking of the stunning views from Stockade Hill. This is a very special aspect of Howick for everyone to enjoy. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
223
#100
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
224
#101
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Leighton Gosnell Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0211125542 Postal address: 15 Willowbank Close, East Tamaki Heights, Auckland Post code: 2016 Date of submission: 17-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: I support the return to the old 8-9 meter height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
225
#101
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
226
#102
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Andrew Barr Organisation name: Full name of agent: Andrew Barr Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 021716416 Postal address: 17 Maroubra Place, Botany Downs Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 17-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: 17 Maroubra Place Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
227
#102
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
228
#104
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Bethany Deborah Brown Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0210649666 Postal address: 4 Struan Place, Highland Park, Auckland Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 17-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other:
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:
229
#104
Page 2 of 2
(a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
230
#105
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Euan Lavis Round
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 5374403
Postal address: 3 Camwell Close Bucklands Beach Auckland 2012
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones
Property address:
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: The current provision does not go far enough to preserve the views and character of the location
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission date: 17 October 2017
231
#105
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
232
#106
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Andrea Christine Round
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 5374403
Postal address: 3 Camwell Close Bucklands Beach Auckland 2012
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones
Property address:
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: The current provision does not go far enough to preserve the views and character of the location
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission date: 17 October 2017
233
#106
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
234
#107
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: william knighting Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 534 8563 Postal address: Unit 1/ 50 Moore Street Howick Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 17-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): restore change back to 8 to 9 metre heights Property address: along ''shaft views'' from stockade hill footpath Map: Stockade Hill -Picton St Map as below Other: Covering Picton Street [left side down]--Walter Macdonald street]---Parkhill Rd -- Uxbridge Rd---and --Selwyn Rd areas
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: The protection of the village's outstanding historical ''shaft views'' of local rural and coastline areas from ground level at Stockade Hill and Ridge Rd locations I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
235
#107
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
236
#108
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Jarrod Colbert
Organisation name: The Nakhle Investment Trust
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021666220
Postal address: 420 Airfield Road Papakura Auckland 2582
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: The Single House Zone insofar as it applies to the Takanini Sub-Precinct D.
Property address: 899 Papakura-Clevedon Road, Papakura.
Map or maps: Takanini Precinct Plan / Unitary Plan Zoning Map.
Other provisions: Takanini Precinct Plan.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: The site (899 Papakura-Clevedon Road - encompassing the Takanini Sub-Precinct D area) was identified as a SHA area to enable development. However, prior to obtaining SHA status, the developer had obtained a resource consent to subdivide the site (which was within the Kirikiri Structure Plan area). The previous subdivision consent authorized the creation of some 89 lots in the first stage sized 600m2 upwards. This subdivision consent was never actioned apart from using it to earthwork to the current subdivision design. During the Unitary Plan process and well before any decisions were made, a new application as an SHA was submitted and consented based on designing the development in accordance with the proposed Mixed Housing Suburban zone. In fact this subdivision was substantially completed by the time the Unitary Plan was made operative. During the Unitary Plan hearings process however, the Commissioners decided the zone should be Single House Zone, meaning that the average and minimum lot sizes authorized within the development would not comply with the rules of the Single House Zone. We are not clear if this was an error or a
237
#108
Page 2 of 2
misunderstanding of the near complete status of the actual development. As a result of this, a building coverage limitation of 35% (and other development controls which more appropriately reflect larger Single House zones) now apply to the lots within this development, despite the lot sizes and layout accurately reflecting the Mixed Housing Suburban zone. To further exacerbate the issue, an existing Design Covenant has been included in all agreements and already registered on the titles to these lots requiring a minimum dwelling size of 175sqm (meaning that any lot smaller then 500sqm will automatically infringe the 35% building coverage development control). As the majority of the lots in this development are smaller than 500sqm, the purchasers will either; (a) have to build a dwelling over two storeys (which dramatically increases the cost and time of construction and further contributes to affordability issues, as well as limiting variation in housing typology and creating a very dominant physical built form on almost every site, or (b) lodge some 150 adhoc resource consent applications to enable the possibility of single storey construction. To avoid these issues, we seek either; the adoption of the Mixed Housing Suburban Zone across the Takanini Sub-Precinct D area, OR, the adoption of a 40% Building Coverage limitation so that affordable but sizeable dwellings can be constructed on the lots without the need for around 150 individual consent applications and the cost and the significant delays this would cause. As the subdivision was originally designed for the Mixed Housing Suburban zone, all of the ponds have been designed to cater for at least 40% building coverage. Our engineer has advised us that the increased building coverage will have a positive benefit, as it will ensure that more stormwater runoff is directed into the reticulated network at the bottom of the catchment, thereby minimising downstream flooding effects which is a significant issue for the wider Papakura Catchment.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: Adopt the Mixed Housing Suburban Zone OR a building coverage limitation of 40% over Takanini Sub-Precinct D to ensure that the zoning and development controls correctly reflect the size of the lots.
Submission date: 18 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
238
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Jarrod Colbert
Organisation name: Manukau Quarries Limited
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021666220
Postal address: 420 Airfield Road Papakura Auckland 2582
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Whitford Sub-Precinct B
Property address: 885 Whitford-Maraetai Road, Beachlands 2018
Map or maps: Whitford Precinct Plan
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: Whitford Sub-Precinct B has been adopted over the Manukau Quarry area and implements provisions that seek to control the location of buildings/subdivision for the Whitford Countryside Living/Rural area. As the site is not intended for Residential Land Use (i.e. currently operates as a Quarry and has a Special Purpose - Quarry zoninig), these provisions are not directly related to the use/zoning of the site, however, affect the use/operation of the quarry. Specifically, they have created erroneous technical infringements for which resource consent has had to be obtained to enable the use of the site for quarry activities. In light of this, we seek the removal of the Quarry area from Sub-Precinct B.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: Remove Whitford Sub-Precinct B from applying to the Manukau Quarry site. Refer to attached diagram.
#109
Page 1 of 5239
Submission date: 18 October 2017
Supporting documents Proposed Amendment - Whitford Precinct.pdf
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#109
Page 2 of 5240
#109
Page 3 of 5241
#109
Page 4 of 5242
#109
Page 5 of 5243
#110
244
245
246
247
#112
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Beachlands Avenues Limited
Organisation name: Beachlands Avenues Limited
Agent's full name: Osborne Hay (North) Ltd Attn. David Hay
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 425-9844
Postal address: PO Box 16 Warkworth Auckland 0941
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Beachlands 1 Precinct and in particular Table I403.6.2.1 Yards
Property address: -
Map or maps: -
Other provisions: -
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: BAL is neutral in respect to the changes to the proposed correction to the precinct boundary, the correction to the activity table and the landscape buffer etc. In respect to Table I403.6.2.1 Yards, BAL supports the intent of the change but opposes the format used as it does not clarify how the yards apply along stormwater management areas/open space. As it reads currently, it implies that either a 8 or 3m front yard (ie the yard that adjoins the road) is required if the site adjoins a stormwater management area or public open space. The rule is confusing and it is strongly recommended that the original clear wording from the former Operative Manukau District Plan is used instead. This original wording was clear on what the yard required adjoining the stormmater management area was and when the front yard requirement could be reduced. The relevant page from the Manukau District Plan with the rule is attached.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Page 1 of 3248
#112
Details of amendments: To reword the "Front Yard" rules as per the original rule in the former Operative Manukau District Plan (attached).
Submission date: 18 October 2017
Supporting documents Pg 26 - Manukau District Plan.pdf
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
Page 2 of 3249
Manukau Operative District Plan 2002
Chapter 17.16 — Beachlands Village: New Avenues Page 26
Similarly, satellite dishes or other antennae should be carefully located to ensure they do not appear visually prominent in the street scene.
Rule 17.16.10.2 Yards
(a) Front Yard
(i) The front yard set back shall be a minimum of 6m, provided that:
• for sites adjoining Jack Lachlan Drive a 6m yard is required where sites are controlled by Rule 17.16.13.2.12 and an 8m yard is required where sites are not controlled by Rule 17.16.13.2.12.
• for corner sites the front yard setback may be reduced to 3m in respect of one yard only.
• for sites adjoining a Stormwater Management Area or Public Open Space Zone the yard facing the Stormwater Management Area or Public Open Space Zone shall be a minimum of 6m.
• for sites adjoining a Stormwater Management Area or Public Open Space Zone and a street the front yard setback may be reduced to 3m.
(b) Side Yards
One yard shall be a minimum of 2m and one yard shall be a minimum of 3m.
(c) Rear Yard
The rear yard shall be a minimum of 8m, except for rear sites where two of the required four rear yards shall be a minimum of 3m.
Page 3 of 3250
#113
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Elizabeth Anne Edwards Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0276938498 Postal address: 28 Pohutukawa Avenue, Howick, Auckland Post code: 2014 Date of submission: 18-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change Extend the 'Height Variation Control' to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: I would like to see the views of the sea and island as I drive into Howick. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
251
#113
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
252
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Karaka North Village
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Harrison Grierson, attn: Nick Grala
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0211995050
Postal address: PO Box 5760 Wellesley Street CBD Auckland 1141
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Refer attached submission
Property address: Karaka North Precinct, Karaka
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: Refer attached submission
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 18 October 2017
Supporting documents SUB001v3-136064-nhg.pdf
Attend a hearing
#114
Page 1 of 5253
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#114
Page 2 of 5254
Page 1 of 3
ON A PUBLICLY NOTIFIED PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE
TO
SUBMISSION ON
NAME OF SUBMITTER
SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
#114
Page 3 of 5255
Page 2 of 3
#114
Page 4 of 5256
Pag
e 3
of
3
AP
PE
ND
IX 1
– K
NV
L D
ET
AIL
ED
SU
BM
ISS
ION
ON
PC
4 P
RO
VIS
ION
S
TA
BL
E 2
: P
RO
VIS
ION
S S
UB
MIS
SIO
N T
AB
LE
SU
BM
ISS
ION
PO
INT
PR
OV
ISIO
N
KN
VL
SU
BM
ISS
ION
R
EL
IEF
SO
UG
HT
#114
Pag
e 5
of 5
257
#115
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Andries Popping
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 5346327
Postal address: 6 Mellons Bay Road Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachement 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachement 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ to limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf. 2/ preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 19 October 2017
258
#115
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
259
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Kevin Taylor
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021758823
Postal address: 2/14 Eastridge Court Howick Auckland 2013
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: "Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones"
Property address:
Map or maps:
Other provisions: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 19 October 2017
Attend a hearing
#116
Page 1 of 3260
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#116
Page 2 of 3261
#116
Page 3 of 3262
#117
Page 1 of 2263
#117
Page 2 of 2264
#118
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Pine Harbour Holdings Limited
Organisation name:
Agent's full name: Osborne Hay (North) Ltd Attn. David Hay
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 425-9844
Postal address: PO Box 16 Warkworth Auckland 0941
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Pine Harbour Precinct (I431)
Property address: -
Map or maps: -
Other provisions: -
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: The proposed changes (3 lines in Attachment 13) are considered to be corrections and align the rules with the Pine Harbour Marina Zone in the Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section) where they were derived from.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 20 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
265
#118
Page 2 of 2
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
266
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Brittney Sutherland
Organisation name: HLC (2017) Limited
Agent's full name: Brittney Sutherland, Harrison Grierson
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 212 6569
Postal address: level 1 dilworth house 71 Great South Road Newmarket auckland 1051
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Hobsonville Point Precinct
Property address: Hobsonville Point
Map or maps: Hobsonville Point precinct
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: Please refer to attachment
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 20 October 2017
Supporting documents S001v3-PC4 AUP-rpkreview.pdf
Attend a hearing
#119
Page 1 of 4267
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#119
Page 2 of 4268
Page 1 of 2
TO
SUBMISSION ON
NAME OF SUBMITTER
SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
#119
Page 3 of 4269
Page 2 of 2
#119
Page 4 of 4270
#120
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Di Wood Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 0212966291 Postal address: 13 Eclipse Place, Auckland Post code: 2012 Date of submission: 20-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Property address: Map: Other: I support the return to the old 8-9 metre height limit from Crawford Reserve to Parkhill Rd. Howick.
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I wish to preserve the unique village atmosphere and view shaft from the Stockade Hill I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
271
#120
Page 2 of 2
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
272
#121
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Colin Marshall
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 02102851804
Postal address: 2A Endymion Place Half Moon Bay Auckland 2012
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: I support the change back to the previous height limits of 8 to 9 metres
Property address: Stockade Hill
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: I want everyone to enjoy the view across the gulf from stockade Hill.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 14 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
273
#121
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
274
#122
Page 1 of 2275
#122
Page 2 of 2276
Submission on a publicly notified proposal for policy statement or plan change or variationClause 6 of Schedule 1, Resource Management Act 1991FORM 5
Send your submission to [email protected] or post to :
Attn: Planning TechnicianAuckland Council Level 24, 135 Albert StreetPrivate Bag 92300Auckland 1142
For office use only
Submission No:
Receipt Date:
Submitter detailsFull Name or Name of Agent (if applicable)Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms(Full Name)Organisation Name (if submission is made on behalf of Organisation)
Address for service of Submitter
Telephone: Fax/Email:
Contact Person: (Name and designation, if applicable)
Scope of submissionThis is a submission on the following proposed plan change / variation to an existing plan:
Plan Change/Variation Number PC 4: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
Plan Change/Variation Name
The specific provisions that my submission relates to are:(Please identify the specific parts of the proposed plan change / variation)
Plan provision(s)
OrProperty Address
OrMap
OrOther (specify)
SubmissionMy submission is: (Please indicate whether you support or oppose the specific provisions or wish to have them amended and the reasons for your views)
I support the specific provisions identified above
I oppose the specific provisions identified above
I wish to have the provisions identified above amended Yes No
The reasons for my views are:
TONEA Investments (NZ) Limited
The maximum height standards in the Takanini area have historically been limited due
30 Walters Road, Takanini
Height Variation Control
c/o Vaughan Smith Planning Limited, PO Box 3426, Shortland Street, Auckland
021 378 827 [email protected]
Vaughan Smith
#123
Page 1 of 2277
(continue on a separate sheet if necessary)
I seek the following decision by Council:
Accept the proposed plan change / variation
Accept the proposed plan change / variation with amendments as outlined below
Decline the proposed plan change / variation
If the proposed plan change / variation is not declined, then amend it as outlined below.
I wish to be heard in support of my submission
I do not wish to be heard in support of my submission
If others make a similar submission, I will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing
__________________________________________ _________________________________________Signature of Submitter Date(or person authorised to sign on behalf of submitter)
Notes to person making submission:If you are making a submission to the Environmental Protection Authority, you should use Form 16B.
Please note that your address is required to be made publicly available under the Resource Management Act 1991, as any further submission supporting or opposing this submission is required to be forwarded to you as well as the Council.
If you are a person who could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6(4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
I could /could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission.If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission please complete the following:
I am / am not directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that:(a) adversely affects the environment; and (b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
to the geotechnical limitations of the ground for supporting tall structures. It is now acknowledged that engineering solutions for building foundations make such restrictions unnecessary. The maximum height envisaged in the Town
Centre zone is 27m and TONEA considers that this building height is appropriate for its property at 30 Walters Road.A lower height limit will not enable the efficient use of the land to most appropriately achieve the intensification aims of The Auckland Plan and the Regional Policy Statement.
TONEA acknowledges that a Height Variation Control has been erroneously omitted from its property at 30 Walters but considers that a 27m limit should be imposed rather than the 18m limit proposed in PC4.
_______________________ 20 October 2017
#123
Page 2 of 2278
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Praveen Dasarathi
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0212523270
Postal address: 12A Sturdee Road Manurewa Auckland 2102
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Zone changes from Mixed Housing Urban to Mixed Housing Suburban
Property address: 6B Clark Street Manurewa Auckland 2102
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: From Praveen Dasarathi 6B Clark Street Manurewa Auckland 2102 To Auckland Council New Zealand Sub: Submission to Auckland council Unitary plan changes under PC4.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would like to provide some feedback to the changes proposed to unitary plan zones under PC4, affecting my section at 6B Clark Street Manurewa, Auckland. This submission is to request the Council to retain the current Mixed Housing Urban zoning of my section. The proposed changes to the current zoning will potentially negatively impact to the market value of my section. The site has a zoning of Mixed Housing Urban under the PAUP, which has no density standards associated with it subject to the provision of house designs. Vacant lot subdivision is provided for at one site per 300m². There are some options for the redevelopment of the site from my perspective.
#124
Page 1 of 13279
Site Description: The subject site is located to the northern side of Clark Street and is accessed via an existing 3.7m leg-in access strip. The western half of the site, excluding the access way, is currently undeveloped. In terms of flood hazards, there is an overland flow path running through the site in a north-south direction and approximately two thirds of the site is affected by a flood plain. However, as part of any redevelopment of the site, the overland flow path and flood plain can potentially be maintained from a function perspective while still allowing some development ability with specific engineering input. Infrastructure The site is served with existing connections to public water, wastewater and storm water reticulations and the power and telecommunication networks. A public sewer line runs east-west through the site, either underneath or to the south of the existing access way. A public storm water line also runs north-south through the site. Associated public storm water and wastewater manholes are located inside the southern boundary of the site. The site is well-served in terms of fire fighting coverage, with hydrants located in the berm in front of 4 and 10 Clark Street, which are both near the site. Considering the above, and based on the subdivision and development controls that apply to the Mixed Housing Urban zone, several options remain to further develop the section to increase the current yield. The most conventional approach for the section would be to establish/create 2 new dwellings/lots. This would be achieved by the construction of two new dwellings on the section (to the west of the flood hazards/easement area), followed by a subdivision around those new buildings. In this scenario, the existing access way/driveway of the parent site could be utilised to provide access to all new lots. I am attaching a design which has been prepared in this regard. It may also be possible to construct an additional dwelling over the flood hazard/easement area which will require specific engineering design to ensure that the hydrological function and storage capacity of the overland flow path and 1% AEP flood plain are not impeded in any undue manner.
The following subdivision scenarios (or combination thereof) are provided for under the PAUP and could potentially be applied to this site:
• Boundary adjustments which do not exceed 10 per cent of the net site area of each site – controlled activity; and/or
• Boundary adjustments which exceed 10 per cent of the net site area of each site – discretionary activity; and/or
• Subdivision around existing lawfully established building(s) – restricted discretionary activity; and/or
• Subdivision of a minor dwelling from the principal dwelling where the proposed sites comply with the minimum site size requirements of the zone – restricted discretionary activity; and/or
• Subdivision of land within the one per cent annual exceedance probability floodplain – as a restricted discretionary activity; and/or
• Subdivision in accordance with an approved resource consent – restricted discretionary activity.
Under Mixed Housing Suburban Zoning Two options are available for the building under Suburban Zone:
Option 1:- One double storey building with a common partition in the middle. With this option there will be lot of planning issues like outlook spaces, car parking etc.
Option 2:- Single two-storey house with one unit on ground floor and second on first floor. This will have less constraint on planning requirement like outlook areas.
Based on the above information I believe there shall be significant drop in the market value of the property after rezoning of my property to Mixed Housing Suburban. Hence I request the Auckland Council planners to retain the current zoning of my section.
Regards, Praveen Dasarathi
#124
Page 2 of 13280
I or we seek the following decision by council: Amend the plan modification if it is not declined
Details of amendments: Please retain Zoning of my property as Mixed Housing Urban
Submission date: 21 October 2017
Supporting documents 3D lot 1and2 from west boundary_20171021101957.446.pdf Current (1)_20171021102014.461.pdf
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#124
Page 3 of 13281
#124
Pag
e 4
of 1
328
2
31.0
31.0
30.6
30.8
30.830.8
30.8
30.8
30.8
30.8
SWMHLL=30.60ILout=29.42ILin=29.60ILin=29.45ILin=29.52
SWMHLL=30.99ILout=29.59ILin=30.04ILin=29.61ILin=30.09
CPLL=30.52
CPLL=30.62
SSMHLL=30.67ILout=29.12ILin=29.24ILin=29.17
SSMHLL=30.71
157°56'40" 62.80
27°1
7'10
" 3.9
3
76°37'40" 54.38
337°58'20" 20.08247°58'40" 60.39
Down Pipe
Down Pipe
Down Pipe
Down Pipe
33.64
30.7830.88
33.62
33.60
33.81
33.81
33.8233.49
33.68
33.68
33.68
33.73
34.22
34.23
33.37
33.37
33.29
33.29
33.88
33.88
33.79
33.79
33.89
33.8533.81
35.21
35.21 35.10
35.20
35.20
34.68
36.28
36.2735.93
35.96
35.74
36.32
36.3136.44
36.43
34.56
34.57
35.73
35.73
32.87
34.28
30.76
30.66
30.72
30.74 30.77 30.77
30.73
30.75
30.79
30.79
30.88
30.78
30.84
30.87 30.84
30.81
30.85
30.83
30.77
30.74
30.79
30.92
30.81
30.74
30.75
30.93
30.87
30.89
30.92
30.93
30.93
30.93
30.97
30.89
30.7530.78
30.95
30.9
3
30.86
30.80
30.74
30.68
30.75 30.73
30.74
30.86
30.98
30.9
230.92
30.88
30.83
30.76
30.73
30.74
30.82
30.79
30.76
30.74
30.7630.76
30.78
30.79
30.8730.86
30.79
30.78
30.74
30.91
30.92
30.92
30.95
30.97
30.98
30.7530.74
31.03
31.02
31.02
31.04
31.01
30.68
30.61
30.73
30.87
30.81
30.72
30.67
30.70
30.75
30.80
30.93
30.64
30.61
30.48
30.62
30.66
30.62
30.70
30.83
30.89
30.90
30.84
30.88
30.83
30.73
30.70
30.65
30.7
6
30.66
30.80
3DP 46451
6 Cl
ark S
treet
4DP 46451
8 Clark Street
2DP 467064
10A Clark Street
6DP 46451
12 Clark Street
12DP 36688
22 Martin Road
6DP 45040
24 Martin Road7
DP 4504026 Martin Road
2DP 479263
28A Martin Road
2DP 46451
4 Clark Street
DP 4785316 Clark Street
Gully Traps
FFL=31.48
FFL=31.56
FFL=31.51
FFL=31.48
FFL=31.52
Telecom Plinth
Aircon Unit
Power Stub
Peg
ABD
150mmØ Wastewater Main
(Approximate location from Council Records)
150mm
Ø Wastew
ater Main
(Approximate location from
Council Records)
150mmØ Wastewater Main
300mm
Ø Wastewater M
ain
(Approximate location from
Council Records)
300mm
Ø Wastew
ater Main
(Approximate location from
Council Records)
450mm
Ø Stormw
ater
(Approximate location from
Council Records)
525mm
Ø Stormw
ater
525mm
Ø Stormw
ater
Existing Dwelling
Existing Dwelling
Chimney
Conc
Conc
Wooden Fence
Wooden Fence
Wooden FenceW
ooden Fence
Area in Grass
Porch
Deck
DeckShed
Storage
Steps
Steps
Steps
Shed
Area in Grass
Conc
SealedCarport
Existing Drainage Easement in Gross
337°52'40" 6.62
Xref D:\P
roject\20
16\6 Clar
k Street\
Lot 3\lot
3-Floor Pl
an - Leve
l 1 Copy
1.dwg
UP
A
1
3
H
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
SITE PLAN
NTS
A010Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
LOT 1 - GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
LOT 2 - GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
LOT 3 - GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
#124
Page 5 of 13283
UP
A
1
GARAGE
BEDROOM 1
TOILET/SHR
PORCH
4790
3
3305
H
W/R
3045
6065
1725
4790
LEVEL 1 - FLOOR PLAN
1255
DN
UP
DN
A
1
KITCHEN
TOILET/HB
LOUNGE
3
H
3735
1000
3960
3415
PORCH ROOF
LEVEL 2 - FLOOR PLAN
DECK
4790
DN
A
1 3
H
2165
BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 3
2000
3430
3525
1115
2955
1000
2075
4570
W/D
W/D
FAMILY
2140
2560 1810
1120
0
935
B
DECK
4790
LEVEL 3 - FLOOR PLAN
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
FLOOR PLANS
NTS
C020Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
#124
Page 6 of 13284
Level 131700
A
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
H
10m HEIGHT
EX GROUND ELEVATION
1.00
73°18'0"
45.00°
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
EAST ELEVATION
NTS
C030Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
EAST ELEVATION
#124
Page 7 of 13285
Level 131700
A
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
H
10m HEIGHT
EX GROUND ELEVATION
3.60
73°18'0"
45.00°
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION
NTS
C040Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
WEST ELEVATION
#124
Page 8 of 13286
Level 131700
1
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
310m HEIGHT
EX GROUND ELEVATION
Level 131700
1
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
310m HEIGHT
EX GROUND ELEVATION
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATION
NTS
C040Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
#124
Page 9 of 13287
UP
A
1
GARAGE
BEDROOM 1
TOILET/SHR
PORCH
4500
3
10803305
1120
0
H
3120
1730
W/R
3045
6065
1000
1725
5
GARAGE
BEDROOM 1
TOILET/SHR
PORCH
1120
0
6065
1725
31001090
1000
4500
9205
LEVEL 1 - FLOOR PLAN
DN
UP
DN
UP
A
1
KITCHEN
TOILET/HB
LOUNGE
3
4490
H
3735
1000
3960
2065
3415
5
KITCHEN
TOILET/HB
LOUNGE
PORCH ROOFPORCH ROOF
9205
1120
0
LEVEL 2 - FLOOR PLAN
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
FLOOR PLANS
NTS
B020Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
#124
Page 10 of 13288
DN
A
1 3
H
4490
2165
BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 3
2000
3430
3525
1115
2955
1000
2075
4570
W/D
W/D
FAMILY
5
BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 3
2000
2075
W/D
W/D
FAMILY
800
2140
2560 1810 1765 2355
9205
1120
0
3525
2150
2955
2140
935 935
4415
LEVEL 3 - FLOOR PLAN
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
FLOOR PLANS
NTS
B030Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
#124
Page 11 of 13289
Level 131700
A
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
H
73°18'0"
45.00°
10m HEIGHT
11m
EX GROUND ELEVATION
Level 131700
A
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
H
73°18'0"
45.00°
10m HEIGHT
11m
EX GROUND ELEVATION
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
ELEVATIONS
NTS
B040Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
#124
Page 12 of 13290
Level 131700
1
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
5
73°18'0"
45.00°
10m HEIGHT
11m
EX GROUND ELEVATION
Level 131700
1
Level 234590
Level 337480
ROOF39930
510m HEIGHT
11m
EX GROUND ELEVATION
DRAWN
TRACED
CHECKED
DATE
SCALE
SHEET
SERIES OF
REV:
B.R
ELEVATIONS
NTS
B050Nov 2016
DRAWN/DESIGNED BY:BINAY RATTAN42 St LEONARDS ROADKELSTON 0602MB: 0210759786: DDI: 09 8139296
6 CLARK STREET, MANUREWALOT 3 DP 46451
NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION
#124
Page 13 of 13291
#125
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Nicky McCormick
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0211834572
Postal address: 59b Moore St Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Height restrictions being returned to previous limits of 8 - 9 meters around the Stockade Hill area
Property address: Stockade Hill
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: The views from Stockade Hill and the road as you drive past it into Howick are outstanding and very much a part of our heritage. I have travelled extensively and this is still my favourite view in the world and it would be tragic if you blocked it with buildings.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 22 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
292
#125
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
293
#126
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Eman Asaad
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0210360670
Postal address: 14 Roxborough Place East Tamaki Heights Auckland 2016
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Flat Bush Precinct I was applied to this address. I believe that this address should be considered as Mixed Housing Suburban Zone.
Property address: 14 Roxborough Place, East Tamaki Heights, Auckland 2016
Map or maps: Attachment 32- Flat Bush Precinct I
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: This address is directly adjacent to Mixed Housing Suburban Zone. Therefore, we hope that this address will also be a Mixed Housing Suburban Zone.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: 14 Roxborough Place is surrounded from two sides by Mixed Housing Suburban Zone. Not only remove Flast Bush Precinct I from this address. We hope that you change the Zone into a Mixed Housing Suburban Zone instead of Single House Zone.
Submission date: 22 October 2017
294
#126
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
295
#127
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Dulcie Emma Hobson
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 095343234
Postal address: 9B Abercrombie St Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ to limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf.and surrounding area.and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2/ preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Center Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
296
#127
Page 2 of 2
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
297
#128
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Penny Anson
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0212448001
Postal address: 39 Grange Road Mt Eden Auckland 1024
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: E25.6.10
Property address:
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: I support the proposed addition of ‘industrial zones' into Rule E25.6.10(1)(2) and (3)(a) and (b) as outlined in the Proposed Recommendation in Attachment 8 ‘Chapter E – Auckland Wide’. I agree that it is appropriate that workers accommodation permitted in the industrial zones be subject to a noise insulation standard. I note that any other form of accommodation in industrial zones should also be required to comply with the noise sensitive spaces standard. As dwellings and integrated residential development are non-complying activities in the Light Industrial zone, consent may be sought and granted for these activities where they satisfy the ‘gateway’ test. Therefore the insertion of ‘industrial zones’ into Rule E25.6.10(1)(2) and (3)(a) and (b) is necessary otherwise all occupants of accommodation would be subject to intolerable noise levels. The proposed recommendation is consistent with the purpose of sustainable management in section 5 and the principles within Sections 6, 7, 8 and within Part 2 of the RMA. In particular the recommendation allows for the health and wellbeing of people living in industrial zones. The recommendation does not conflict with the RPS or any other statutory instruments. The proposed recommendation is consistent with the Independent
298
#128
Page 2 of 2
Hearing Panel Recommendations and Auckland Council submissions on the Proposed Unitary Plan. In summary, the impact of not correcting the technical error may result in adverse impacts on occupiers of dwellings in industrial zoned sites where external noise levels are likely to be higher than other zones.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
299
#129
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: BRIAN KINSMAN
Organisation name: NIL
Agent's full name: NIL
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 5343398
Postal address: 32 DRAKE ST HOWICK AUCKLAND 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: PLAN CHANGE 4 PROTECTION OF VIEWS FROM STOCKADE HILL HOWICK
Property address:
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: THE PLAN AS PROPOSED WILL RUIN HOWICK AS A HISTORIC VILLAGE AND TOTALY SPOIL VIEWS THAT ARE UNIQUE AND UN REPLACEABLE IT WILL RUIN FOR MANY FOR THE MONEY GAIN OF A FEW
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification with amendments
Details of amendments: LIMIT BUILDING HEIGHT TO RETAIN SEA VIEWS AT ROAD LEVEL
Submission date: 23 October 2017
Attend a hearing
300
#129
Page 2 of 2
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
301
#130
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Na Wang
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0211480869
Postal address: 22 Mellons Bay Road Howick Auckland 2013
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ to limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf.and surrounding area.and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2/ preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Center Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
302
#130
Page 2 of 2
Submission date: 24 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
303
#131
Page 1 of 2304
#131
Page 2 of 2305
Glaister EnnorBarristers I Solicitors I Notary Public
(Incorporating the practice of Macky Roberton)
24 October 2017
For Email Transmission
Email [email protected]
Norfolk House
18 High StreetPO Box 63
Shortland Street
Auckland 1140New Zealand
DX CX 10236
T +64 9 356 8243
F +64 9 356 8244
www.glaister.co.nz
Auckland CouncilPrivate Bag 92300Auckland 1142
For: Planning Technician
Submission on Proposed Plan Change 4 to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)
Please find attached the Kingseat Group's submission on Proposed Plan Change 4 to the Auckland UnitaryPlan (Operative in Part).
Yours faithfullyGlaister Ennor
Per:
Vicki ToanPartner
E [email protected] +64 9 914 3501FAX +64 9 356 8244
5S775S-14-0003
Est. 1907 www.glaister.co.nz
#132
Page 1 of 3306
SUBMISSION ON PUBLICLY NOTIFIED PROPOSAL FOR PLAN CHANGE
Clause 6 of schedule 1, Resource Management Act 1991
To Auckland CouncilPrivate Bag 92300Auckland 1142
For: Planning Technician
Email: unitaryplan@)aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
1 The submitter is the Kingseat Group.
2 This is a submission on Proposed Plan Change 4 to Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part),a plan change comprising corrections to technical errors and anomalies ("PC4").
3 The Kingseat Group could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this
submission.
4 This specific provisions of PC 4 that this submission relates to are the proposed amendments
to rule 1418.8.2 Assessment Criteria in respect of the Kingseat Precinct (see PC 4,
Attachment 13).
5 The Kingseat Group supports the proposal to amend
(a) 1418.8.2(16)(a) as follows: In addition to considering the relevant assessment criteriain 1418.8.2(1)-(H15) above the Council will also consider...
(b) 1418.8.2(19)(b) as follows: With reference to provision 1418.8.2(19)(a) above andconsideration of any scheduled building, structure, area or tree, assessment criteria
in section 1418.8.2(ll)(c)(il are relevant.
These amendments are required to ensure that alt relevant criteria listed earlier in the rule(s)
are referred to.
6 The Kingseat Group opposes the proposal to amend 1418.8.2(16)(a) as follows: In addition toconsidering the relevant assessment criteria in 1418.8.2(l)-(-lil6) above the Council will also
consider...
This amendment is a duplication of the earlier listed amendment to the same provision, and
which incorrectly identifies the relevant criteria for assessment. The identification of
relevant criteria is incorrect because it refers to itself as well as the preceding criteria.
7 The Kingseat Group seeks that the changes to 1418.8.2(16)(a) and 1418.8.2(19)(b) set out inparagraph 5 of this submission be accepted and that the change set out in paragraph 6 ofthis submission be rejected.
8 In the event that the change referred to in paragraph 6 of this submission is meant to be areference to rule 1418.8.2(17)(a) and the proposal is to amend that rule to read: The Councilin considering the relevant assessment criteria in 1418.8.2(1)-{-H16) above for subdivision
#132
Page 2 of 3307
and development considered restricted discretionary activities within the former Kingseat
Hospital site, will also consider the following matters...
The Kingseat Group would support this change for the reasons set out in paragraph 5 of this
submission.
9 The Kingseat Group does not wish to be heard in support of its submission.
Dated ;^ ' ' October 2017
VJToanCounsel for the Kingseat Group
Address for Service:
C/- Glaister Ennor
DX CX 10236, AucklandP 0 Box 63, Shortland Street, Auckland 1140
For: VJToan
Telephone: +6493568243Facsimile: +6493568244
Email: [email protected]
#132
Page 3 of 3308
#133
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: scott Lowry
Organisation name: Envoco Ltd
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0274750722
Postal address: P.O.Box 393,Auckland Papakura Auckland 2113
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: P.C 4 Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan(operative in part). Administration Plan Change-Vested Land to be Rezoned-Attachment 36
Property address: 342R Clevedon-Kawakawa Road,Clevedon
Map or maps: S35 South Attachment 39
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: I oppose the proposed zone change for 343R Clevedon-Kawakawa Road9MapS35) from coastal -Mooring Zone to Open Space-Conservation Zone because the relevant rules, objectives and policies that apply to the open space-Conservation Zone would not enable ongoing maintenance of stop-banks for the protection of adjoining properties from tidal and flooding inundation, which would significantly affect the usability and the value of the adjacent rural land. It could also affect future development of the above mentioned property
I or we seek the following decision by council: Decline the plan modification
Submission date: 24 October 2017
309
#133
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
310
#134
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Frances Joy Oxford
Organisation name: NA
Agent's full name: NA
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 5370657
Postal address: 5a Solana Court Botany Downs Auckland 2010
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: View Shaft - Ridge Road, Howick
Property address: Stockade Hill, Ridge Road Howick
Map or maps:
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: The view shaft that has always been on Ridge Road, Howick, must be retained. Amend the height of buildings blocking the view to what they were under the former Manukau City Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 24 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
311
#134
Page 2 of 2
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
312
#135
Page 1 of 2313
#135
Page 2 of 2314
#136
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: David Morell Stevenson Organisation name: - Full name of agent: - Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 095346315 Postal address: 64A Mirrabooka Avenue,, Botany,, Auckland. Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 25-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): adjust height variation control for Howick Town Centre Zone and mixed use zones. Property address: as depicted on pages 7 and 8 of plan change 4 document attachment 33 proposed amendments the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC 4) Map: as depicted on pages 7 and 8 (continue as above to PC4) Other: Extend the "height variations control " to the red boundary in this map apply the heights outlined in the map.
Submission I/We: Oppose the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: No The reason for my/our views are: 1. To limit building heights in order to protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf and surrounding area and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church the oldest in Auckland. 2. Preserve the current low rise built form of Howick`s Town Centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Centre Plan. I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: Yes If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: Yes If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to
315
#136
Page 2 of 2
make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
316
#137
Page 1 of 1317
#138
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Anand Nair
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021 759 098
Postal address: 4A Ridge Road Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1. To limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf and surrounding area and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2. Preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Center Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
318
#138
Page 2 of 2
Submission date: 25 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
319
#139
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Janet Stevenson
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 021300434
Postal address: 37 Ridge Road Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: : As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1/ to limit building heights in order protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf.and surrounding area.and to limit incongruous heights beside All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2/ preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Center Plan
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
320
#139
Page 2 of 2
Submission date: 25 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
321
Contact details
Full name of submitter: UP Management Limited and Waiwera Properties Limited
Organisation name: UP Management Limited and Waiwera Properties Limited
Agent's full name: Ellis Gould, Solicitors (J G Goodyer)
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 093060747
Postal address: Ellis Gould Solicitors PO Box 1509 Auckland 1140 Auckland Auckland 1140
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Attachment 14 relating to I545 Waiwera Precinct
Property address: Waiwera Precinct Sub-precinct A and B
Map or maps: n/a
Other provisions: 1545.8.1 and I545.8.2
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we oppose the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? Yes
The reason for my or our views are: See uploaded submission document
I or we seek the following decision by council: Decline the plan modification
Submission date: 25 October 2017
#140
Page 1 of 5322
Supporting documents PPC4 Submission By UPML and WPL-0001.pdf
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#140
Page 2 of 5323
#140
Page 3 of 5324
#140
Page 4 of 5325
#140
Page 5 of 5326
#141
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Robert Gordon Finley
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 095374749
Postal address: 63 Parkhill Rd Howick Auckland Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7&8 of Plan Change Document "Attachment 33:Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)"
Map or maps: As depicted on pages 7&8 of Plan Change Document "Attachment 33:Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer (PC4)"
Other provisions: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: 1 To limit building heights in order to protect the current expansive views of the Hauraki Gulf and surrounding area, and to limit incongruous heights besides All Saints Selwyn Church, the oldest in Auckland. 2 to preserve the current low rise built form of Howick's town centre in keeping with the low rise Howick Village Centre Plan.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
327
#141
Page 2 of 2
Submission date: 25 October 2017
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
328
#142
Page 1 of 2
Contact details Full name of submitter: Shuk Yee Lau Organisation name: Full name of agent: Email address: [email protected] Phone (daytime): 099713268 Postal address: 152A Aviemore Drive, Highland Park, Auckland Post code: 2010 Date of submission: 25-Oct-2017
Scope of submission Policy statement/plan change/variation: Plan Change 4 Policy statement/plan change/variation: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part) The specific provisions that my submission relates to are: Plan provision(s): Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre- Business Town Centre Zone and Business Mixed Use Zones Property address: Map: Other: Change: Extend the ‘Height Variation Control’ to the red boundary in the map page 7 Attachment 33 Apply the heights outlined in the map
Submission I/We: Support the specific provisions identified above I/We wish to have the provisions identified above amended: Yes The reason for my/our views are: I/We seek the following decision by council: Accept the proposed policy statement/plan change/variation I/We wish to be heard in support of my/our submissions: No If others make a similar submission, I/we will consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing: If you could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may be limited by clause 6 (4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
329
#142
Page 2 of 2
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that: (a) Adversely affects the environment; and (b) Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. Yes I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public. Any further submission supporting or opposing this submission must be forwarded to me as well as the council: Accept
330
#143
Page 1 of 2331
#143
Page 2 of 2332
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Bledisloe Property Group Limited
Organisation name: Bledisloe Property Group Limited
Agent's full name: Michael Campbell
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 0212789018
Postal address: P O Box 147001 Ponsonby Auckland 1144
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules:
Property address: 5 Paisley Place, Mount Wellington, Auckland
Map or maps: Zoning Map and Gabador Place Precinct
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: Refer to attached submission
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 26 October 2017
Supporting documents PPC4 submission - Bledisloe Property Group.pdf
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes
#144
Page 1 of 6333
Would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing if others have made a similar submission? Yes
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
Yes
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
#144
Page 2 of 6334
Page 1 of 4
FORM 5
SUBMISSION ON PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 4 (CORRECTIONS AND
TECHNICAL ERRORS) AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN
To: Auckland Council Private Bag 92300
Auckland 1142 Name of Submitter: Bledisloe Property Group Limited The Submitter provides this submission on proposed Plan Change 4 (‘PC4’) to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part). The Submitter could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission. The Submitter is directly affected by the scope of PC4. This submission relates to the geographical area and scope of PC4, namely 5 Paisley Place, Mount Wellington, Auckland. INTRODUCTION
The Submitter is the recent purchaser of a property at 5 Paisley Place in Mount Wellington (‘the property’) (Lot 4 DP 466684). The property is 0.9613 hectares in area, and is relatively flat for most of the site, with the eastern portion sloping down towards the coast. The site is irregular in shape. The site fronts Paisley Place, but it also has frontage onto the Tamaki River. The site is currently occupied by the MWM Dry Stack marine facility which includes a recently constructed dry dock, with hardstanding areas and boat launching facilities. The majority of the property is zoned as Light Industry under the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part). Those sites located to the north, south and the west are also zoned as Light Industry. Part of the property is zoned Open Space (Informal Recreation Zone). It is also noted that the majority of the property is located within the Gabador Place Precinct.
#144
Page 3 of 6335
Page 2 of 4
The land and coastal marine area at Paisley Place and Gabador Place in Mt Wellington adjoins the Tāmaki River, and is used for a variety of marine and port activities, including boat dry stack, boat building and travel lifts, and the handling and transferring of bulk liquids and sand and shingle. Commercial and private vessels regularly use the Tāmaki River to access the boat dry stack and boat building yards and to transport materials by barge to the wharves located at the Gabador Place facility. The precinct provides for the integrated and efficient operation and development of the Gabador Place Precinct by providing for the operation, development, and expansion of marine and port activities, and marine and port facilities. Adjoining land uses are currently marine industrial in nature. A plan showing the location of the property is below:
Figure 1 – location of 5 Paisley Place, Mount Wellington
SUBMISSION
The Submitter supports PC4 which seeks to rezone that portion of the property from Open Space (Informal Recreation) zone to Light Industry Zone. The submitter also supports the extension of the Gabador Place Precinct to cover the property in its entirety. The proposed recommendation is contained in Attachment 33 of PC4. The Council has stated that PC4 deals with a range of corrections and anomalies to the Unitary Plan (Operative in Part). The Council has noted that the property is in private ownership and it is not an esplanade reserve. This is confirmed by the submitter. The subject land is no right of public access. It is considered that rezoning the land to Light Industry will be consistent with the present zoning of the majority of the site and surrounding land. It is noted
#144
Page 4 of 6336
Page 3 of 4
that the rezoning will essentially fill in the area of the Gabador Place Precinct area, which includes the spatial area located within the Coastal Marine Area. The proposed rezoning will continue to provide for the integrated and efficient operation and development of the Gabador Place Precinct by providing an additional area for the operation, development, and expansion of marine and port activities, and marine and port facilities. The proposed rezoning will promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources, and will not be contrary to Part 2 of the Resource Management Act 1991 ('the Act"); The applicable objectives, policies and rules of the AUP(OIP), will continue to be appropriate as they relate to the Submitter’s site and they:
i) will promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources; ii) are consistent with the purpose and principles of the Act; iii) will not give rise to adverse effects on the environment that cannot be avoided, remedied or
mitigated; iv) are appropriate and justified in terms of Section 32 of the Act. For the reasons noted above, the Submitter considers that this property should be fully rezoned to Light Industry with the Gabador Place Precinct extended to cover the entire site, and seeks that outcome accordingly. RELIEF SOUGHT
The Submitter seeks the following decision from Auckland Council in respect of PC4:
That PC4 be confirmed for 5 Paisley Place, Mt Wellington to be rezoned to Light Industry with the Gabador Place Precinct extended to cover the entire site.
The Submitter wishes to be heard in support of his submission. If other parties make a similar submission, the Submitter would consider presenting a joint case with them at any hearing.
Michael Campbell Director
Campbell Brown Planning Limited
For and on behalf of Bledisloe Property Group Limited 26 October 2017
#144
Page 5 of 6337
Page 4 of 4
Address for service:
Bledisloe Property Group C/- Campbell Brown Planning Limited PO Box 147001 Ponsonby AUCKLAND 1144
Attention: Michael Campbell Telephone: (09) 394-1696 Email: [email protected]
#144
Page 6 of 6338
#145
Page 1 of 2
Contact details
Full name of submitter: Anna Maria Roestenburg
Organisation name:
Agent's full name:
Email address: [email protected]
Contact phone number: 09 5339945
Postal address: 67 Cook St Howick (Note this is correction of error ) Howick Auckland 2014
Submission details
This is a submission to:
Plan modification number: Plan change 4
Plan modification name: Corrections to technical errors and anomalies in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in part)
My submission relates to
Rule or rules: Adjust Height Variation Control for Howick Town Centre - Business Town Centre Zone and Mixed Use Zones
Property address: As depicted on pages 7 & 8 of Plan Change 4 document "Attachment 33: Proposed amendments to the maps in AUP GIS viewer( PC4)"
Map or maps: Extend the "Height Variation Control" to the red boundary in this map. Apply the heights outlined in the map.
Other provisions:
Do you support or oppose the provisions you have specified? I or we support the specific provisions identified
Do you wish to have the provisions you have identified above amended? No
The reason for my or our views are: I believe we must preserve the current low rise build that was always part of the old Manukau Heritage zone. Howick Village Plan accepts that the low rise nature of the area is a characteristic which must be kept. High buildings and appartmentswould destroy the streetscape of the old charming village totally.It would destroy Howick for business and all its tourist potential.
I or we seek the following decision by council: Accept the plan modification
Submission date: 26 October 2017
339
#145
Page 2 of 2
Attend a hearing
Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? No
Declaration
Could you gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission? No
Are you directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of this submission that:
Adversely affects the environment; and Does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
No
I accept by taking part in this public submission process that my submission (including personal details, names and addresses) will be made public.
340
Plan Change 4 – Auckland Unitary Plan Matvin Group Limited – Silverdale 3 Precinct 1
Submission on Proposed Plan Change 4 to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part)
Clause 6 of Schedule 1, Resource Management Act 1991
Matvin Group Limited – Silverdale 3 Precinct
To: Auckland Council
1. SUBMITTER DETAILS
Name of Submitter: Matvin Group Limited
This is a submission on Proposed Plan Change 4 to the Auckland Unitary Plan – Operative in Part.
Matvin Group Limited could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission. Matvin Group Limited is directly affected by effects of the subject matter of the submission that:
a) Adversely affect the environment; and
b) Do not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.
2. SCOPE OF SUBMISSION
The specific aspects and provisions of the Unitary Plan that this submission relates to are:
a) The proposed amendments to the Silverdale 3 Precinct.
3. SUBMISSION
Matvin Group Limited is the current owner of Sec 4 SO 432882, Hibiscus Coast Highway Silverdale 0932, which is within the Silverdale 3 Precinct. The Silverdale 3 Precinct provisions are based on the consent order that was agreed as part of Plan Change 123 to the former Rodney District Plan, which rezoned the site from Future Urban to Special Zone 35 providing for a range of business and residential activities in accordance with the Hibiscus Coast Gateway Outline Plan. In accordance with the agreed approach to incorporating recent plan changes into the Unitary Plan Plan Change 123 was drafted to fit within the Unitary Plan framework resulting in the subject land being zoned General Business and subject to the Silverdale 3 Precinct provisions. In the drafting some errors occurred that restricted land uses to a greater extent than provided for in the agreed consent order. Plan Change 4 seeks to correct these drafting errors. The proposed changes to the precinct include:
• Amendments to the note prior to the activity table setting out the background to the transport infrastructure activity rules;
• Amendments to the activity table to provide for additional retail activities – dairies and food
#146
Page 1 of 2341
Plan Change 4 – Auckland Unitary Plan Matvin Group Limited – Silverdale 3 Precinct 2
and beverage activities that were omitted in error; • Amendments to include commercial services in the activity table, that were omitted in error; • Amendments to the activity table to provide for service stations as a restricted discretionary
activity because they were inadvertently excluded because they were within the definition of a drive through activities in the Rodney Plan;
• Amendments to the activity table to include provision for emergency services, recreation facilities and marae complex;
• Amendments to the Indicative Roads rule that enables the internal roads to be varied by more than 20m (with the exception of Spine Road).
Matvin Group Limited supports the proposed changes to the Silverdale 3 Precinct as they provide necessary clarification and provide for the range activities and development that was originally intended when the consent order for Plan Change 123 was agreed. 4. DECISIONS SOUGHT
Matvin Group Limited seeks the following relief from Auckland Council (or other relief or other consequential amendments as are considered appropriate or necessary to address the concerns set out in this submission):
a) Approve the Plan Change 4 provisions applying to the Silverdale 3 Precinct.
Matvin Group Limited wishes to be heard in support of this submission.
Date: 25 October 2017
Burnette O’Connor, Barker & Associates Ltd
(Person authorised to sign on behalf of submitter)
5. ADDRESS FOR SERVICE
Matvin Group Limited C/- Barker & Associates Ltd PO Box 1986 Shortland Street AUCKLAND 1140 Attn: Burnette O’Connor DDI: 09 422 3336 Mobile: 021 422346
Email: [email protected]
#146
Page 2 of 2342
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
SUBMISSION ON PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 4: CORRECTIONS TO TECHNICAL ERRORS AND ANOMALIES IN THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN
(OPERATIVE IN PART)
To: Attention: Planning Technician
Plans and Places
Auckland Council
Private Bag 92300
Auckland 1142 [email protected]
KORDIA LIMITED (“Kordia”) at the address for service set out below makes the
following submission on Proposed Plan Change 4: Technical Errors and Anomalies
in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (“the Plan Change”).
Introduction
1. This submission on the Plan Change is made on behalf of Kordia.
2. Kordia is a state-owned enterprise which owns an extensive communications
network in New Zealand, and is the major provider of television and radio
broadcast facilities.
3. Kordia is also a requiring authority (as a network utility operator under section
167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”) holding several
designations in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (“UnitaryPlan”), specifically Designations 3300, 3301, 3302, 3303 and 3304.
4. Of particular relevance to this submission is Designation 3300 which is a joint
designation with Television New Zealand Limited (“TVNZ”) Designation 8301.
These joint designations relate to the microwave transmission corridor.
Scope of Submission
5. The submission relates to the Plan Change as a whole, including, but not
limited to the need for the Plan Change to address the discrepancies between
joint designations 3300 and 8301, so that they are identical in the Unitary
Plan.
#147
Page 1 of 57343
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
2
The Submission is:
6. Kordia opposes the Plan Change, for the reasons set out below.
7. Provided that the relief sought below and attached is granted:
(a) The Plan Change will be in accordance with the purpose and
principles of the RMA and will be appropriate in terms of section 32 of
the RMA;
8. In the absence of the relief sought, the Plan Change:
(a) Is contrary to the sustainable management of natural and physical
resources and is otherwise inconsistent with Part 2 of the RMA;
(b) Will in those circumstances impact significantly and adversely on the
ability of people and communities to provide for their social, economic
and cultural wellbeing.
9. In particular, but without limiting the generality of the above:
(a) Currently, there are discrepancies in the Unitary Plan between the two
joint designations held by Kordia and TVNZ for the microwave
transmission corridor between the TVNZ Broadcasting Centre at 100
Victoria Street, Central Auckland to the Waiatarua Transmission
Station at 539 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua.
(b) The effect of this is that users of the Unitary Plan who have
landholdings under the microwave transmission corridor are having to
deal with conflicting designation conditions despite them being a joint
designation.
(c) In summary, the discrepancies which require correction through the
Plan Change are as follows:
Designation 3300
Designation Number
(i) Designation 3300 is missing an asterisk after its designation
number which refers plan users to the description below.
#147
Page 2 of 57344
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
3
Accordingly, the following amendment is required to
Designation 3300:
Designation Number 3300*
...
*Joint Kordia Ltd and Television New Zealand Ltd (Designation 8301) designation from 100 Victoria Street West, Auckland Central to Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby. Kordia Ltd only designation from Ponsonby Road to 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua.
Purpose
(ii) There is a minor inconsistency between the purpose
statements of Designation 3300 and 8301. Specifically,
Designation 3300 refers to the “Television New Zealand
Studios” and Designation 8301 refers to the “TVNZ
Broadcasting Centre”.
(iii) Whilst this is a minor discrepancy, it is Kordia’s submission that
Designation 3300 should be amended as follows so as to
ensure that the joint-designations are identical:
‘Purpose Microwave transmission corridor – a protection corridor of specified height (elevation above sea level) and width through which no building, structure or tree can pass to ensure continuity of a microwave linking / transmission path from the Television New Zealand Studios TVNZ Broadcasting Centre at 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland to the Waiaturua transmission tower at 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua.’
Condition 1
(iv) There is an inconsistency between the relevant standard
recorded in Condition 1 of the designations. Designation 8301
references the relevant standard as being NZS2772.1:1999
(“1999 Standard”), whereas Designation 3300 references
NZS6609:1990 (“1990 Standard”). Kordia’s decision1 on its
designations (“Decision”) updated condition 1 of Designation
1 Decision of Kordia on Designations 3300, 3301, 3302, 3303 and 3304 to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan dated 30 September 2016.
#147
Page 3 of 57345
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
4
3300 to include the 1999 Standard, however, this has not been
translated into the Unitary Plan.
(v) As such, Condition 1 in Designation 3300 will need to be
modified to read:
‘All masts, antennas, aerials and other facilities must comply with New Zealand Standard NZS6609: 1990 NZS2772.1:1999 or any amendments where the public has access.’
(vi) The reference to the 1990 Standard is clearly an error of
translation and should be updated to the 1999 Standard for the
reasons set out in the Decision, namely that the 1990 Standard
is outdated and modification to the 1999 Standard is necessary
to reflect the current New Zealand Standard with which
telecommunication facilities are required to comply.
Condition 2
(vii) There is an inconsistency between Condition 2 of joint
Designations 3300 and 8301 in that Designation 3300 refers to
the (outdated) Auckland City Consolidated Bylaw 1991
(“Bylaw”) as a relevant regulation for the requiring authority to
comply with. Designation 8301 does not reference the Bylaw.
(viii) For the reason that the Bylaw is no longer in force, and to
ensure consistency between the joint designations for plan
users, Kordia submits that Designation 3300 should be
amended as follows:
‘Any significant increase in radio frequency energy levels from this source shall comply with the Auckland City Consolidated Bylaw 1991 and any statutory regulation controlling radio frequency exposure levels.’
(d) As Kordia’s Designation 3300 is a joint Designation with TVNZ’s
Designation 8301, Kordia also makes a submission requesting the
following amendments are made to Designation 8301 to ensure
consistency. TVNZ has made an identical submission.
#147
Page 4 of 57346
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
5
Designation 8301
Description
(i) The description of Designation 3300 was modified in Kordia’s
Decision to correct the physical location of the Transmission
Station at Scenic Drive, Waiatarua:
‘Joint Kordia Ltd and Television New Zealand Ltd (Designation 8301) designation from 100 Victoria Street West, Auckland Central to Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby. Kordia Ltd only designation from Ponsonby Road to 501 539 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua.’
(ii) This amendment has not been made to Designation 8301.
(iii) The reference to 501 Scenic Drive in Designation 8301 is
clearly an error and should be amended as per joint
Designation 3300 for the reasons set out in Kordia’s Decision,
namely to correct a typographical error in the physical location
of the facility which will have no corresponding environmental
effects.
Description/Purpose
(iv) The purpose statement is headed ‘Description’ in joint
Designation 8301, rather than ‘Purpose’ as in joint Designation
3300. For clarity and consistency this heading should be
amended to read ‘Purpose’ in Designation 8301.
Co-ordinates of start and end point or corridor and setting of datum
level
(v) The tables in joint Designations 3300 and 8301 show, at
specific points along the path of the corridor, the width of the
corridor and the base height of the corridor. Intermediate
widths and heights are stated as being determined by
extending straight lines between adjacent points.
(vi) In its Decision, Kordia modified the table in Designation 3300
to include start and end reference points that correlate with the
maps and also provide the datum on which the heights in the
table are to be measured from.
#147
Page 5 of 57347
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
6
(vii) This amendment was not made to Designation 8301.
(viii) It is Kordia’s submission that the following amendment should
also be made to Designation 8301 for consistency, and the
reasons set out in Kordia’s Decision, namely that this clarifies
the start and end points of the corridor and provides an
explanation as to the basis for determining relative height level
along the corridor:
‘The 19.3km corridor runs between 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland, being 803494.03mN, 399729.84Me and 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua, being 794818.46mN, 382527.82mE. (Points A and E respectively in the ‘Key specific points’ annotation following the table)
Levels provided are in terms of Auckland Vertical Datum (MSL) 1946; Origin SM 6181 SO 53103C RL=30.645M. Coordinates are in terms of Geodetic datum Mount Eden Circuit’
(ix) This does not alter the requirements of the current condition as
notified and serves only to clarify how the conditions are to be
applied.
Cross Section Diagram of the Microwave Transmission Corridor
(x) The cross section diagram of the microwave transmission
corridor (Attachment 1) was removed from Designation 3300
by Kordia in its Decision.
(xi) The cross section diagram of the microwave transmission
corridor still remains in joint Designation 8301.
(xii) It is Kordia’s submission that the cross section diagram
(Attachment 1) should also be removed from joint Designation
8301 for consistency with joint Designation 3300, and for the
reasons set out by Kordia in its Decision, namely that the
cross-section is illegible and irrelevant to the actual
determination of height at any given point along the corridor.
The table is sufficient to indicate height restrictions to any
persons applying the designation heights to their property.
#147
Page 6 of 57348
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
7
Technical Paper on Corridor Dimension and Radio Frequency
Emissions
(xiii) The ‘Technical Paper on Corridor Dimension and Radio
Frequency Emissions’ (Attachment 2) (“Technical Paper”) was
removed from joint Designation 3300 by Kordia in its Decision.
(xiv) However, the Technical Paper still remains in joint Designation
8301.
(xv) It is Kordia’s submission that the Technical Paper should be
removed from Designation 8301 to ensure consistency with
joint Designation 3300 and for the reasons set out by Kordia in
its Decision, namely that it is a technical paper that serves as
background information only with no direct requirements in it
for either the requiring authority or the owners of properties
over which the corridor passes. Further, the reproduction of
the table forming part of the designation in this technical paper
contains a typographical error that may lead to confusion as to
which table is correct.
10. A copy of Designation 3300 showing relief sought in track change is
appended as Attachment A.
11. A copy of Designation 8301 showing relief sought in track change is
appended as Attachment B.
Relief Sought
12. Kordia seeks the following decision from Auckland Council on the Plan
Change:
(a) That Designations 3300 and Designation 8301 are amended as per
Attachments A and B so as to provide for the sustainable
management of the Region’s natural and physical resources and
thereby achieve the purpose of the RMA.
(b) Such further or other relief, or other consequential or other
amendments, as are considered appropriate and necessary to
address the concerns set out herein.
#147
Page 7 of 57349
#147
Page 8 of 57350
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
9
Attachment A – Relief Sought - Track Change Version of joint Designation 3300
#147
Page 9 of 57351
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1
Designation Schedule - Kordia Ltd
Number Purpose Location 3300 Microwave transmission corridor ... 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland to 539
Scenic Drive, Waiatarua
3301 Broadcasting and telecommunications facility ...
539 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua
3302 Broadcasting and telecommunications facility ...
Kaipara Hills Road (Pt Allotment 201 Psh Tauhoa), Kaipara Hills
3303 Broadcasting and telecommunications facility ...
192 Browns Bay Road, Pine Hill
3304 Broadcasting and telecommunications facility ...
Repeater Road (Pt Allotment 33 Psh of Atou and Pt Allotment 65A Psh of Atou), Hunua Ranges
#147
Page 10 of 57352
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 2
3300 Microwave Transmission Corridor
Designation Number 3300*
Requiring Authority Kordia Ltd
Location 100 Victoria Street West, Auckland Central to 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua
Roll Over Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 301, Auckland Council District Plan (Central Area Section) 2005; Designation B0802, Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 1999; and Designation K2, Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section) 2003
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
*Joint Kordia Ltd and Television New Zealand Ltd (Designation 8301) designation from 100 Victoria Street West, Auckland Central to Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby. Kordia Ltd only designation from Ponsonby Road to 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua.
Purpose
Microwave transmission corridor – a protection corridor of specified height (elevation above sea level) and width through which no building, structure or tree can pass to ensure continuity of a microwave linking / transmission path from the Television New Zealand Studios TVNZ Broadcasting Centre at 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland to the Waiatarua transmission tower at 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua.
Conditions
1. All masts, antennas, aerials and other facilities must comply with New Zealand Standard NZS6609: 1990NZS2772.1:1999 or any amendments, at all times.
The following table shows, at specific points along the path of the corridor, the width of the corridor and the base height of the corridor. Intermediate widths and heights shall be determined by extending straight lines between adjacent points.
The 19.3km corridor runs between 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland, being 803494.03mN, 399729.84mE and 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua, being 794818.46mN, 382527.82mE (Points A and E respectively in the ‘Key specific points’ annotation following the table).
Levels provided are in terms of Auckland Vertical Datum (MSL) 1946; Origin SM 6181 SO 53103C RL=30.645. Coordinates are in terms of Geodetic datum Mount Eden Circuit.
Path Length (KM)
Corridor Width (m)
Maximum Obstruction Height above Mean Sea Level (m)
0.000 (a) 6.8 62.6 0.025 6.8 63.0 0.050 6.8 63.4 0.075 6.8 63.8
#147
Page 11 of 57353
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 3
Path Length (KM)
Corridor Width (m)
Maximum Obstruction Height above Mean Sea Level (m)
0.100 6.8 64.2 0.125 6.8 64.6 0.150 6.8 65.0 0.175 6.8 65.4 0.200 6.8 65.8 0.225 6.8 66.2 0.250 6.8 66.6 0.275 6.8 67.0 0.300 6.8 67.3 0.325 6.8 67.7 0.350 6.8 68.1 0.375 6.8 68.5 0.400 6.8 68.9 0.425 6.8 69.3 0.450 6.8 69.7 0.475 6.8 70.1 0.500 6.8 70.5 0.525 6.8 70.9 0.550 6.8 71.3 0.575 6.8 71.7 0.600 6.8 72.1 0.625 6.8 72.5 0.650 6.8 72.9 0.675 6.8 73.3 0.700 6.8 73.7 0.725 6.8 74.1 0.750 6.8 74.5 0.775 6.8 74.9 0.800 6.8 75.3 0.825 6.8 75.7 0.850 6.8 76.1 0.875 6.8 76.5 0.900 6.9 76.8 0.925 7.0 77.2
#147
Page 12 of 57354
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 4
Path Length (KM)
Corridor Width (m)
Maximum Obstruction Height above Mean Sea Level (m)
0.950 7.1 77.6 0.975 7.2 77.9 1.000 7.3 78.3 1.10 7.6 79.7 1.20 7.9 81.1 1.30 8.2 82.6 1.40 8.5 84.1
1.50 (b) 8.8 85.5 1.60 9.1 87.0 1.70 9.3 88.5 1.80 9.6 90.0 1.90 9.8 91.5 2.00 10.0 93.0
2.10 (c) 10.2 94.5 2.20 10.4 96.1 2.30 10.6 97.6 2.40 10.8 99.1 2.50 11.0 100.7 2.60 11.2 102.2 2.70 11.4 103.8 2.80 11.6 105.3 2.90 11.7 106.9 3.00 11.9 108.4 3.10 12.1 110.0 3.20 12.2 111.6 3.30 12.4 113.2 3.40 12.5 114.7
3.50 (d) 12.7 116.3 3.60 12.8 117.9 3.70 12.9 119.5 3.80 13.1 121.1 3.90 13.2 122.7 4.00 13.3 124.3 4.5 13.9 132.4
#147
Page 13 of 57355
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 5
Path Length (KM)
Corridor Width (m)
Maximum Obstruction Height above Mean Sea Level (m)
5.0 14.4 140.6 5.5 14.8 148.8 6.0 15.2 157.2 6.5 15.5 165.6 7.0 15.8 174.2 7.5 16.0 182.8 8.0 16.2 191.4 8.5 16.3 200.2 9.0 16.4 209.0 9.5 16.4 218.0
10.0 16.4 227.0 10.5 16.4 236.0 11.0 16.3 245.2 11.5 16.1 254.4 12.0 15.9 263.7 12.5 15.7 273.1 13.0 15.4 282.6 13.5 15.1 292.1 14.0 14.7 301.8 14.5 14.2 311.5 15.0 13.7 321.3 15.5 13.1 331.2 16.0 12.4 341.2 16.5 11.6 351.4 17.0 10.6 361.6 17.5 9.6 372.0 18.0 8.2 382.5 18.5 6.8 393.2 19.0 6.8 403.2 19.1 6.8 405.2 19.2 6.8 407.2
19.3 (e) 6.8 409.2
Key specific points: a. Network Centre;
#147
Page 14 of 57356
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 6
b. Ponsonby Road; c. Corner of Richmond Road and Chamberlain Street; d. Corner of Old Mill Road and West View Road; and e. Waiaturua.
2. Any significant increase in radio frequency energy levels from this source shall comply with the Auckland City Consolidated Bylaw 1991 and any statutory regulation controlling radio frequency exposure levels.
Attachments
None.
#147
Page 15 of 57357
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 7
3301 Waiatarua Broadcasting and Telecommunications Facility
Designation Number 3301
Requiring Authority Kordia Ltd
Location 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua
Roll Over Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation K1, Auckland Council District Plan (Waitakere Section) 2003
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Purpose Broadcasting and telecommunications facility the continued operation of the existing broadcasting and telecommunications facility including two lattice towers of 121.9m and 27.5m height, a transmission building with roof top antenna mounting gantry, broadcasting and telecommunication antennas, and ancillary and associated works including power transformer, backup power generator etc.
Conditions
1. The Notice shall be given effect to in accordance with the requirement/application and assessment of effects on the environment prepared by Hey Consulting 2011 Limited, and Plans titled ‘Waiatarua Tower Layout’ being drawing number 18141101, ‘Waiatarua Tower Locations", "Waiatarua Tower No 2 Antenna Locations" 18141102, "Waiatarua Building East Gantry Antenna Locations" 18141103 and "Waiatarua Site Plan" being drawing Ref 18141010.
2. An Outline Plan is not required for the addition and replacement of antennas on the existing tower provided the antenna including the mount, the shroud, and ancillary equipment shall fit within the dimensions of a square shape in plan view that, when measured from the centre of the tower base, does not increase the effective visual width of the tower by more than 50% (see attached Diagram 1).
3. An Outline Plan is not required for the addition or replacement of antennas attached to or above the existing transmission building provided that: a. No gantry, pipe mount or antenna extends to an elevation greater than 3m above the roof line of the building; and/or b. No antenna affixed to a building measures greater than 1.2m in dimension.
4. No new structures having a height of more than 2m shall be erected on the site without submission of an Outline Plan of works pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 other than the antennas or supporting infrastructure as set out in conditions 2 and 3 above or as provided for by any other national standards.
5. Structures which are either intended to replace existing structures or any temporary structures erected for the purposes of allowing maintenance or repair of existing structures are permitted provided that any temporary or replaced structures are removed once any such replacement, maintenance or repair has been completed.
6. Only two telecommunications tower shall be on the site with the main tower having a maximum height of 121.9m and a secondary tower having a maximum height of 27.5m including any attachments.
7. Radio frequency radiation emissions from the site shall comply with NZS 2772.1:1999 Radio Frequency Fields (Maximum Exposure Levels 3kHz to 300GHz).
#147
Page 16 of 57358
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 8
Attachments
Site and Locality Plan
#147
Page 17 of 57359
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 9
Tower elevations (Main and Secondary Towers)
#147
Page 18 of 57360
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 10
Building East Gantry Antenna Locations
Field Code Changed
#147
Page 19 of 57361
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 11
Diagram 1 - Depiction of Antenna Size Condition and Potential Effect
#147
Page 20 of 57362
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 12
3302 Kaipara Hills Broadcasting and Telecommunications Facility
Designation Number 3302
Requiring Authority Kordia Ltd
Location Kaipara Hills Road, (Pt allotment 201 Psh Tauhoa) Kaipara Hills
Roll Over Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 970, Auckland Council District Plan (Rodney Section) 2011
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Purpose Broadcasting and telecommunications facility – the continued operation of the existing broadcasting and telecommunications facility including a monopole mast of 23m height, a transmission building with ancillary and associated works including power transformer, backup power generator etc.
Conditions
1. General The activity shall proceed in general accordance with the Notice Of Requirement submitted to council, dated 31st August 2000, and attached plans drawn by Connell Wagner Ltd, Numbered 4290NT/A01, A02, C01, C02, and C03, and plans drawn by WoodwardClyde (NZ) Ltd Numbered AA28110026/01/A001 and AA28110026/01/S001 including the recessive colour scheme proposed.
2. Additional Equipment The following equipment shall be permitted to be attached to or erected on the mast and associated structures or elsewhere on the site, on a permanent basis without the provision of an Outline Plan pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act in terms of conditions 1 above: a. A steel unipole mast of up to 23m height with an additional 2m lightning rod located at the top of
the mast; b. Up to six (6) dish antennas with a diameter greater than 2.5m, but less than 5.0m; c. Broadcasting, telecommunication and radio communication antennas including whip, grid, yagi,
dipoles and panels or similar ancillary equipment, but no single antenna shall have a solid frontal surface area of greater than 5.0m2 or 2.5m in diameter in the case of dish antennas unless otherwise specified in (b) above;
d. Up to two single storey equipment shelters with a combined floor area of less than 50m2; and e. A vehicular access track between the level area of the proposed mast and the road adjacent
together with an area for parking and turning adjacent to the main structures.
3. New Structures
No new structures greater than 2m in height shall be erected on the site without the submission of an Outline Plan pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act other than those provided for in Condition 2 above, or those permitted under other nationally controlling standards or structures on the site, or any other temporary structures erected for the purposes of allowing maintenance or repair of existing structures (providing that such temporary structures will be removed once any such maintenance or repair has ceased).
4. Radio Frequency Exposure a. The Broadcasting and telecommunications facility shall be operated so that it satisfies the
requirements of NZS2772.1:1999 in respect of all areas to which the public may have access.
#147
Page 21 of 57363
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 13
b. A report from a suitably qualified person shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the Consents Manager within three months of the installation commencing operation, confirming that the site is operating in accordance with the NZS2772.1:1999.
c. If the levels do not comply with NZS2772.1:1999, operation shall cease until such time as measures are put in place to ensure compliance with the standard
Attachments
Site Plan
#147
Page 22 of 57364
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 14
Pole Antennae Layout
Proposed Equipment Shelter and Slab Layout
#147
Page 23 of 57365
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 15
3303 Pine Hill Broadcasting and Telecommunications Facility
Designation Number 3303
Requiring Authority Kordia Ltd
Location 192 Browns Bay Road, Pine Hill
Roll Over Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 184, Auckland Council District Plan (North Shore Section) 2002
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Purpose Broadcasting and telecommunications facility the continued operation of the existing broadcasting and telecommunications facility including a monopole mast of 27.5m height, a transmission building with ancillary and associated works and activities.
Conditions
1. The following equipment shall be permitted to be attached to or erected on the existing mast, on a permanent basis without the provision of any outline plan of works pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991: a. Broadcasting, telecommunication and radio communication antennas including, whip, grid, yagi, dipoles and panels or similar ancillary equipment, but no single antenna dish or panel shall have a solid frontal surface area of greater than 0.6m2 or dimension greater than 1.2m in length or 0.6m in width; b. No part of an antenna may project a horizontal distance greater than 1.4m from the face of the mast measured radially on an axis from the centre of the mast to the furthermost edge of the antenna.
2. Antennas defined in Condition 1 may only be mounted on the Mast and or the telecommunications building. No antennas or additional masts may be mounted elsewhere on the site or the access to the site from Browns Bay Road without the provision of an outline plan of works.
3. No new structures greater than 2m in height shall be erected on the site without the submission of an Outline Plan pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act other than those provided for in Condition 1 above, those permitted by National Environmental Standards or structures on the site, or any other temporary structures erected for the purposes of allowing maintenance or repair of existing structures (providing that such temporary structures will be removed once any such maintenance or repair has ceased).
4. Structures which are either intended to replace existing structures or any temporary structures erected for the purposes of allowing maintenance or repair of existing structures are permitted (provided that such temporary structures will be removed once any such maintenance or repair has ceased).
5. Only one monopole telecommunications mast shall be on the site with a maximum height of 27.5m including any attachments (makes provision for a lightning rod).
6. The maximum area of buildings permitted on the site shall be a sum total of 40m2 and shall have a height no greater than 5m above ground.
7. All new antennas shall be grey (or similar) in colour with a reflectivity less than 33% as measured by the British Standard BS5252 colour range.
#147
Page 24 of 57366
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 16
8. The Broadcasting and telecommunications facility shall be operated so that it satisfies the requirements of NZS2772.1:1999 in respect of all areas to which the public may have access.
9. The noise levels generated by the activity must at all times comply with the permitted noise standards of the Auckland Unitary Plan.
10. Kordia is responsible for ensuring that any third parties services located on the mast do not interfere with the transmission of telecommunication and radio communication services.
Advice Notes 1. Any works outside the ‘envelope of effects’ established by the conditions of the Notice of Requirement (as above) will require an alteration to the designation to be lodged and processed in accordance with Section 181 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
Attachments Site and Locality Plan
#147
Page 25 of 57367
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 17
Pole Antennae Locations
#147
Page 26 of 57368
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 18
3304 Hunua Broadcasting and Telecommunications Facility
Designation Number 3304
Requiring Authority Kordia Ltd
Location Repeater Road (Pt Alottment 33 Psh of Atou and Pt Allotment 65A Psh of Atou), Hunua Ranges
Roll Over Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 17, Auckland Council District Plan (Franklin Section) 2000
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Purpose Broadcasting and telecommunications facility the continued operation of the existing broadcasting and telecommunications facility including a lattice tower of up to 28m in height, a transmission building with ancillary and associated works including power transformer, backup power generator etc.
Conditions
1. The Notice shall be given effect to in accordance with the requirement/application and assessment of effects on the environment prepared by Hey Consulting 2011 Limited, and Plans titled ‘Hunua Tower Layout’ being drawing number 18115101, 18115101mod and ‘Hunua Site and Locality Plans’ being drawing Ref 18115102.
2. An Outline Plan is not required for the addition and replacement of antennas on the existing tower provided the antenna including the mount, the shroud, and ancillary equipment shall fit within the dimensions of a square shape in plan view that, when measured from the centre of the tower base, does not increase the effective visual width of the tower by more than 50% (see attached Diagram 1).
3. No new structures greater than 2m high shall be erected on the site without submission of an Outline Plan of works pursuant to section 176A of the Resource Management Act 1991 other than the antennas or supporting infrastructure as set out in conditions 2 and 3 above or as provided for as a permitted activity in any nationally controlling standards.
4. Structures which are either intended to replace existing structures or any temporary structures erected for the purposes of allowing maintenance or repair of existing structures are permitted provided that any temporary or replaced structures are removed once any such replacement, maintenance or repair has been completed.
5. Only one telecommunications tower shall be on the site with a maximum height of 28m including any attachments. This includes the provision for a lightning rod.
6. Radio frequency radiation emissions from the site shall comply with NZS 2772.1:1999 Radio Frequency Fields (Maximum Exposure Levels 3kHz to 300GHz).
Attachments
#147
Page 27 of 57369
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 19
Site and Locality Plan
Tower Antennae Locations
#147
Page 28 of 57370
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 20
#147
Page 29 of 57371
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 21
Diagram 1 - Depiction of Antenna Size Condition and Potential Effect
#147
Page 30 of 57372
CEK-111899-1-17-V1
10
Attachment B – Relief Sought - Track Change Version of joint Designation 8301
#147
Page 31 of 57373
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1
Designation Schedule - Television New Zealand Ltd
Number Purpose Location 8300 Television broadcasting centre ... 100 Victoria Street, Auckland Central
8301 Microwave transmission corridor 100 Victoria Street, Auckland Central to 539 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua
8302 Satellite earth station transmission path - areas subject to height restrictions
100 Victoria Street, Auckland Central to airspace north and west
#147
Page 32 of 57374
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 2
8300 Television Broadcasting Centre
Designation Number 8300
Requiring Authority Television New Zealand Ltd
Location 100 Victoria Street, Auckland Central
Rollover Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 300, Auckland Council District Plan (Central Area
Section) 2005
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Description
Television broadcasting centre including offices, studios, production facilities, technical services and facilities, transmission equipment, and associated storage and car parking.
Conditions
1 Maximum height
The height of any building shall not exceed 50m except that a transmission tower not exceeding 25m2
in plan area may be erected to a height not exceeding 72m above mean sea level.
2 Rooftop control
a) Rooftop projections including towers, turrets, chimneys, lift towers, machinery rooms and water towers which exceed the height of all parts of a parapet surrounding the roof on which the projections are located, shall be enclosed in either a single structure or a maximum of three structures.
b) All floor space forming part of rooftop projections that meet the requirements of this rule is excluded from the calculation of gross floor area for the development.
3 Floor area ratio
The floor area ratio for the site shall not exceed 4:1 provided that it may be increased to a maximum total floor area ratio of 6:1 through the provision of bonuses in accordance with condition 4 below.
4 Bonus floor area
a) The amount of bonus floor area shall be calculated in accordance with Figure A and, where appropriate, conditions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 below.
b) The area of a feature for which a bonus is obtained cannot be claimed for twice.
Field Code Changed
Field Code Changed
Field Code Changed
Field Code Changed
#147
Page 33 of 57375
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 3
Figure A
Bonus Feature Bonus Floor Area Available per Square Metre of Feature Provided
Maximum Floor Area Ratio Limit to Bonuses on a Site Activities
Accommodation (including Non Permanent Accommodation)
2m² 2:1
Pre-school facility 3m² 1:1
Rest room 3m² 1:1
Plaza 3m² 1:1
Escalators 500m² per pair 0:5:1
Light and outlook See condition 4.1
Through-site links See condition 4.2 0.5:1
Works of art See condition 4.3 1:1
4.1 Light and outlook
A bonus will be awarded where that part of a building to which CFA relates is reduced in coverage as set out in Figure B.
Figure B
Where:
(a) CFA < 0.3 SA
(b) 0.3 ≤ CFA ≤ 0.8 SA
(c) CFA ≥ 8.0 SA
Bonus FAR equals 1.5:1
2.4-(3 x CFA) : 1
SA Nil
SA = site area
4.2 Through-site links
a) The through-site link bonus applies to lanes, arcades and covered links which provide a separately defined, continuous and clearly identifiable public walkway taking the most direct route and providing a shorter and more convenient route than the existing alternative.
b) The bonus floor area achievable per square metre of through-site link provided shall be calculated in accordance with the ratio L1:L2 where:
L1 = The shortest distance between points A and B measured along the road boundary.
L2 = The shortest pedestrian route between points A and B.
#147
Page 34 of 57376
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 4
c) Subject to the maximum FAR limited for a through-site link bonus set out in Figure A:
i) the bonus floor area available per square metre of through-site link provided shall not exceed 10m2 (ie where L1:L2 = 10:1); and
ii) the bonus floor area available per square metre of through-site link provided shall be no less than 5m2 (ie where L1:L2 = 5:1 or less) provided that through-site links that attain less than 2m2 shall not be eligible for a bonus.
d) For the purpose of these measurements the following terms apply:
i) Road boundary includes the shortest distance between points at either end of a pedestrian access which is protected by a registered easement or similar form of dedication.
ii) No part of a through-site link is counted more than once for the measurement of L2.
iii) Where escalator pairs are included in the through-site link they count as having zero distance except that the separate bonus available for escalator pairs still applies.
iv) Where a single escalator is included in a through-site link, the calculation of L2 includes the plan distance of the escalator.
v) Where stairs are included in a through-site link their actual travel distance applies.
4.3 Works of art
a) Bonus floor area is available at the ratio of 5% extra floor area for each 1% of total construction cost spent on the commission and execution of the work of art.
b) For the purpose of calculating the extra floor area which can be claimed, 5% shall be taken off the total floor area which has resulted from the addition of:
iii) the floor area permitted by the basic floor area ratio;
iv) all bonus floor area claimed and awarded (apart from the extra floor area claimed for provision of a work of art);
v) areas contained within a building occupied by pedestrian facilities for which consent has been granted;
vi) areas in entrance foyer/lobby or part thereof being a primary means of access to a building which is open to the public, is accessed directly from a public place and has an overhead clearance of not less than 6m.
c) A certificate prepared and signed by a registered quantity surveyor or registered architect shall be supplied to the Council to verify the total construction cost, land cost and cost of the proposed work of art.
d) If a fraction of the 1% of total construction cost is spent on the commission and execution of the work, the amount of extra floor area granted shall be increased or reduced in the same proportion.
#147
Page 35 of 57377
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 5
5 Screening
Where any outdoor storage, service or refuse disposal area adjoins or directly faces a road or other public open space or a residential precinct, such areas, excluding access ways to off street loading bays, shall be screened from the road, public open space or residential precinct by a solid wall or fence not less than 1.8m in height.
6 Parking and loading
6.1 The maximum number of parking spaces shall not exceed one space per 200 sqm of GFA.
6.2 The following shall be the minimum number of loading spaces to be provided:
Gross Floor Area of Activity (sq m)
Number of Loading Spaces
0 - 20,000 1
20,001 - 50,000 2 (one on-street for courier services)
Over 50,000 3 + 1 per 37,160 sq m (one on-street for courier services)
6.3 The area of any required loading and permitted parking space(s), vehicular access drives and aisles provided within a building shall be excluded from the assessment of gross floor area of that building for the purpose of ascertaining the total number of spaces required.
6.4 Where an assessment of the permitted parking or required loading standards results in a fractional space, any fraction under one half shall be disregarded and any faction of one half or more shall be counted as one space.
7 Formation of parking and loading areas
7.1 Every permitted parking and/or required loading space shall:
a) have dimensions in accordance with Table A Manoeuvring & Parking Space Dimensions;
b) be provided with such access drives and aisles as necessary for vehicles travelling to and from the road, and for the manoeuvring of vehicles within the site.
c) be located on the same site as the activity to which it relates, be available at all times and shall have adequate useable access to that activity or building. Each loading space shall be adjacent to an adequate area for goods handling and shall be convenient to any service area or service lift.
7.2 In addition, every loading space shall be of useable shape and shall be of the following dimensions
a) not less than 8m in depth
b) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in paragraph a) above, for articulated vehicles, not less than 11m in depth
c) for adequate manoeuvring, not less than 3.5m in width, or such greater width as is required
d) not less than 3.8m in height
Field Code Changed
#147
Page 36 of 57378
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 6
7.3 All parking and loading spaces, access drives, manoeuvring areas and aisles shall be formed, provided with an all-weather surface, drained, marked out or delineated, and maintained.
7.4 Required loading areas must be kept clear and available at all times, free of charge and impediment, for vehicles used in conjunction with the particular activity to which the loading spaces relate on the site, and shall not be used for the depositing or storage of any goods or materials or for any other purpose.
7.5 The maximum gradients for parking surfaces and floors shall be 1:16 transversely, and 1:20 longitudinally along the direction of the space. For service and manoeuvring areas the gradient shall not exceed 1:12.5 and shall be kept to a minimum.
7.6 Where a parking or manoeuvring area is adjacent to a road, a kerb or similar barrier, not less than 150mm high and at least 600mm from the road boundary, shall be provided on those parts of the frontage not used for vehicular access.
#147
Page 37 of 57379
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 7
Table A - Manoeuvring and parking space dimensions
Parking Angle
Width of Parking Space
Kerb Overhang
Depth of Parking Space
Manoeuvring Space
Total Depth One Row
Total Depth Two Rows
90o Regular Users*
2.3(a) 2.4(b) 2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
1.0 " " " " "
4.9 " " " " "
8.3 7.1 6.7 6.3 5.9 5.9
13.2 12.0 11.6 11.2 10.8 10.8
18.1 16.9 16.5 16.1 15.7 15.7
90o Casual Users*
2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
1.0 " " "
4.9 " " "
8.1 7.1 6.7 6.6
13.0 12.0 11.6 11.5
17.9 16.9 16.5 16.4
75o 2.3(a)
2.4(b) 2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
1.0 " " " " "
5.2 " " " " "
7.0 6.5 6.0 5.7 5.0 4.3
12.2 11.7 11.2 10.9 10.2 9.5
17.4 16.9 16.4 16.1 15.4 14.7
60o
(3) 2.3(a) 2.4(b) 2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
1.0 " " " " "
5.2 " " " " "
5.0 4.6 4.1 3.5 3.3 3.2
10.2 9.8 9.3 8.7 8.5 8.4
15.4 15.0 14.5 13.9 13.7 13.6
45o
(3) 2.3(a) 2.4(b) 2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
0.8 " " " " "
4.9 " " " " "
3.3 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3
8.2 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.3 7.2
13.1 12.7 12.5 12.3 12.2 12.1
30o
(3) 2.3(a) 2.4(b) 2.5 2.6 2.7 ≥2.75
0.6 " " " " "
4.0 " " " " "
2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3
6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.3
10.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.3
Parallel (3)
5.9 6.1 6.3
0.4 " "
2.5 " "
3.6 3.3 3.0
6.1 5.8 5.5
8.6 8.3 8.0
* Regular users are people whose regular use gives them a familiarity with the building that permits smaller safe clearances between vehicles and parts of buildings. Casual users are people (usually short-term visitors) who would not be familiar with the building layout.
NOTES:
a) Stall widths of 2.3m should only be used where users are familiar with the carpark, and parking is long term. This stall width does not meet the requirements of the Building Code.
b) Stall widths of 2.4m should generally only be used where users are familiar with the carpark. This stall width does not meet the requirements of the Building Code for Casual Users.
c) Minimum aisle widths are 3.5m for a one-way aisle, and 5.5m for a two-way aisle. Where an aisle serves more than 50 spaces, it should be designed as a circulation route in which
#147
Page 38 of 57380
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 8
case the minimum width for a two-way aisle increases to 6.5m. Note that the Building Code requires an extra 0.8m width where pedestrians use a vehicle circulation route.
d) Stall widths shall be increased by 0.3m where they abut obstructions such as columns or walls.
e) All overhang areas shall be kept clear of objects greater than 150mm in height.
f) Where parallel end spaces have direct access through the end of the stall the length of the stall may be reduced to 5.4m.
g) One-way traffic is assumed for angle spaces.
h) Carparks shall have a height of at least 2.3m over the full area of the space, except where special provision is made to divert 'over-height' vehicles, in which case the minimum height may be reduced to 2.1m.
i) Linear interpolation is permitted for stall width, parking angle and aisle width.
8 Access
8.1 Access to Site
a) Every parking and loading space shall have access from a road, in accordance with the following standards:
(i) For carparks not providing access to loading, an unobstructed carriageway not less than 4.5m wide or entrance and exit carriageways, each not less than 2.4m wide.
(ii) For access to loading, an unobstructed carriageway not less than 6m wide or entrance and exit carriageways, each not less than 3m wide.
b) All bends in the carriageway are to be designed in accordance with the appropriate design vehicle.
c) The grade of access shall not be steeper than 1 in 4 for carparks not providing access to loading, and 1 in 8 for access to loading. For curved ramps and driveways, the gradient is measured along the inside radius.
Ramps or driveways terminating on a grade steeper than 1 in 20 prior to the road reserve shall be provided with a platform not steeper than 1 in 20, located adjacent to the road boundary. For land not providing access to loading, the length of the platform shall not be less than 4m, and for land providing access to loading, not less than 6m. Where the driveway gradient is steeper than 1 in 8, a transition section will be required to avoid inadequate ground clearance.
d) No building or building platform served by the access is to be more than 90m from a fire hydrant.
e) Where the width of a carriageway is less than 3m it is to be contained within a corridor 4.5m high and clear of buildings or parts of buildings.
8.2 Vehicular access over footpaths
a) Vehicular crossing over footpaths shall comply with the following:
(i) No more than one crossing will be permitted. However, additional crossings may be approved as a restricted discretionary activity.
(ii) The maximum width of any crossing at the road frontage boundary of the site shall be 6m.
#147
Page 39 of 57381
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 9
(iii) the total crossing width for any front or corner site shall not exceed 50% of the frontage to any road in which it is placed.
(iv) any access shall be so graded as to abut the road boundary at the relative level of the existing footpath.
b) Where entrance locations are altered, crossings no longer required shall be reinstated as verge and/or footpath and the kerbs replaced.
8.3 Reverse manoeuvring
Sufficient space shall be provided on the site so that no reverse manoeuvring on or off the road is necessary by the vehicles using the parking or loading space.
9 Definitions
Average floor area
Average Floor Area (AFA) is the average of the horizontal areas measured at 1.5 metres above all floor levels from the external faces of the building, including all voids and the thickness of external and internal walls, provided that:
a) basement space as defined in this rule shall be exempt from the AFA calculation
b) approved pedestrian amenities and facilities such as through-site links, footpaths widening and escalators shall be exempt from the calculation
c) for sites with a gross site area greater than 2,000 square metres, where the horizontal area at any floor level totals less than 400 square metres, then the horizontal area at that level shall be deemed to be 400 square metres for the purpose of calculating AFA
d) a void forming an integral part of an entrance lobby - foyer (being a primary means of public access to a building) which is open to the public and accessed directly from a public place, shall be exempt from the AFA calculation.
Basement
Basement means any building storey the greater part of the volume of which is below mean street level. Except that for the purpose of calculating average floor area (AFA) and gross floor area (GFA) for a building on a through-site basement means for AFA and GFA:
i) any space within any building storey where the greater part of the volume of that storey is below the mean street level of the lower frontage
ii) any space used for carparking (including manoeuvring areas, access aisles and access ramps) occupying any building storey the greater part of the volume of which is below mean street level of the upper frontage to the midpoint measured horizontally between the upper frontage and the lower frontage (see diagram below).
Calculated floor area (CFA)
Average floor area calculated by averaging the area of that floor or part of the floor immediately below a horizontal plane 12.5 metres above mean street level and all floors above that plane.
Floor area ratio
Floor area ratio (FAR) means the relationship between building gross floor area and land area of the site, and is expressed by the formula:
FAR = gross floor area land area of the site
For the purpose of computing FAR, land area of the site excludes:
#147
Page 40 of 57382
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 10
a) any part of adjoining roads and any portion of the site affected by building lines for the purpose of future road widening unless specifically provided for in this Plan.
b) any part of the site which is made up of the an interest in any airspace above or subsoil below a road.
Gross floor area
Gross floor area (GFA) is the sum of the gross of the several floors of all buildings on a site measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls, or from the centre lines of walls separating two buildings or, in the absence of walls, from the exterior edge of the floor. The measurement point hall be at 1.5 metres above floor level, except for terraces (open or roofed), external balconies and porches when the measurement point shall be at floor level.
In particular gross floor area includes:
a) Voids except as otherwise provided, where vertical distance between storey levels exceeds 6.0 metres, the gross floor area of the building or part of the building so affected shall be taken as the volume of that airspace in cubic metres divided by 3.6.
b) Basement space except as specifically excluded by this definition.
c) Elevator shafts, stairwells and lobbies at each floor unless specifically excluded by this definition.
d) Interior roof space providing headroom of 2.0 metres or more whether or not a floor has been laid.
e) Floor spaces in interior balconies and mezzanines.
f) Floor space in terraces (open or roofed), external balconies, porches if more than 75% of the perimeter of these spaces is enclosed, except that a parapet not higher than 1.2 metres or a railing not higher than 1.4 metres shall not constitute an enclosure.
g) Car parking spaces permitted including driveways, aisles and manoeuvring aisles other than car parking in basement space.
h) All other floor space not specifically excluded.
The gross floor area of the building shall not include:
i) uncovered steps
ii) interior roof space and storage areas having less than 2.0 metres headroom
iii) floor space in terraces (open or roofed), external balconies, or porches where not more than 75% of the perimeter of these spaces is enclosed and where a parapet not higher than 1.2 metres or a railing not higher than 1.4 metres does not constitute an enclosure
iv) pedestrian facilities approved by the Council and eligible for bonus floor space
v) pedestrian circulation space
vi) basement space for stairs, escalators and elevators essential to the operation of a through- site link whether or not such a link qualifies for bonus floor space, or servicing a floor used primarily for car parking or loading
vii) other basement space to an equivalent maximum FAR of 1 except that the space excluded shall not be used in the calculation of permitted parking
viii) required off-street loading spaces
#147
Page 41 of 57383
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 11
ix) car parking in basement space (including manoeuvring areas, access aisles and access ramps) except that the space excluded shall not be used in the calculation of permitted parking
x) non-habitable floor space in rooftop structures
xi) any entrance foyer/lobby or part of it including the void forming an integral part of it (being a primary means of access to a building), which is open to the public, is accessed directly from a public place and has an over-head clearance of not less than 6.0 metres.
Rooftop
Rooftop includes the roof of building podiums in addition to its ordinary meeting. Rooftop projections do not include:
i) Any part of a building included in the definition of gross floor area.
ii) Any roof top ornamental projections including finials, turrets, towers, cupola, pediments and cornices integral to the design of the building; and
iii) Telecommunications antennas and aerials.
Total construction cost
For the purposes of condition 4.3 Total Construction Cost means the total cost of completing the development (or in the case of an existing development, the replacement cost of that development) for which extra floor area is claimed to be an initial tenantable condition, including all external and internal structural walls of the building to a finished standard (but excluding non-structural partitioning and furnishings); all building services; floor coverings; and all site works but not including land cost or the cost of the proposed work of art.
Attachments
No attachments.
Field Code Changed
#147
Page 42 of 57384
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 12
8301 Microwave Transmission Corridor
Designation Number 8301*
Requiring Authority Television New Zealand Ltd
Location 100 Victoria Street West, Auckland Central to Ponsonby Road,
Ponsonby
Rollover Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 301, Auckland Council District Plan (Central Area
Section) 2005
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
*Joint Television New Zealand Ltd and Kordia Ltd (Designation 3300) designation from 100 Victoria
Street West, Auckland Central to Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby. Kordia Ltd designation from Ponsonby
Road to 53901 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua.
Purpose Description
Microwave Transmission Corridor - a protection corridor of specified height (elevation above sea
level) and width through which no building, structure or tree can pass to ensure continuity of a
microwave linking / transmission path from the TVNZ Broadcasting Centre at 100 Victoria Street
West, Central Auckland to the Waiatarua Transmission Station at 539 Scenic Drive, Waiatarua.
Conditions
1. All masts, antennas, aerials and other facilities must comply with New Zealand Standard
NZS2772.1:1999 or any amendments, at all times.
The 19.3km corridor runs between 100 Victoria Street West, Central Auckland, being
803494.03mN, 399729.84mE and 539 Scenic Drive, Waiaturua, being 794818.46mN,
382527.82mE (Points A and E respectively in the ‘Key specific points’ annotation following the
table).
Levels provided are in terms of Auckland Vertical Datum (MSL) 1946; Origin SM 6181 SO 53103C
RL30.645. Coordinates are in terms of Geodetic datum Mount Eden Circuit.
The following table shows, at specific points along the path of the corridor, the width of the corridor
and the base-height of the corridor. Intermediate widths and heights shall be determined by
extending straight lines between adjacent points.
Path Length
(KM)
Corridor Width
(m)
Maximum Obstruction Height
above Mean Sea Level (m)
0.000 (a) 6.8 62.6
#147
Page 43 of 57385
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 13
Path Length
(KM)
Corridor Width
(m)
Maximum Obstruction Height
above Mean Sea Level (m)
0.225 6.8 66.2
0.250 6.8 66.6
0.275 6.8 67.0
0.300 6.8 67.3
0.325 6.8 67.7
0.350 6.8 68.1
0.375 6.8 68.5
0.400 6.8 68.9
0.425 6.8 69.3
0.450 6.8 69.7
0.475 6.8 70.1
0.500 6.8 70.5
0.525 6.8 70.9
0.550 6.8 71.3
0.575 6.8 71.7
0.600 6.8 72.1
0.625 6.8 72.5
0.650 6.8 72.9
0.675 6.8 73.3
0.700 6.8 73.7
0.725 6.8 74.1
0.750 6.8 74.5
0.775 6.8 74.9
0.800 6.8 75.3
0.825 6.8 75.7
0.850 6.8 76.1
0.875 6.8 76.5
0.900 6.9 76.8
0.925 7.0 77.2
0.950 7.1 77.6
0.975 7.2 77.9
1.000 7.3 78.3
1.10 7.6 79.7
1.20 7.9 81.1
1.30 8.2 82.6
1.40 8.5 84.1
1.50(b) 8.8 85.5
1.60 9.1 87.0
1.70 9.3 88.5
1.80 9.6 90.0
1.90 9.8 91.5
2.00 10.0 93.0
#147
Page 44 of 57386
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 14
Path Length
(KM)
Corridor Width
(m)
Maximum Obstruction Height
above Mean Sea Level (m)
2.10 (c) 10.2 94.5
2.20 10.4 96.1
2.30 10.6 97.6
2.40 10.8 99.1
2.50 11.0 100.7
2.60 11.2 102.2
2.70 11.4 103.8
2.80 11.6 105.3
2.90 11.7 106.9
3.00 11.9 108.4
3.10 12.1 110.0
3.20 12.2 111.6
3.30 12.4 113.2
3.40 12.5 114.7
3.50 (d) 12.7 116.3
3.60 12.8 117.9
3.70 12.9 119.5
3.80 13.1 121.1
3.90 13.2 122.7
4.00 13.3 124.3
4.5 13.9 132.4
5.0 14.4 140.6
5.5 14.8 148.8
6.0 15.2 157.2
6.5 15.5 165.6
7.0 15.8 174.2
7.5 16.0 182.8
8.0 16.2 191.4
8.5 16.3 200.2
9.0 16.4 209.0
9.5 16.4 218.0
10.0 16.4 227.0
10.5 16.4 236.0
11.0 16.3 245.2
11.5 16.1 254.4
12.0 15.9 263.7
12.5 15.7 273.1
13.0 15.4 282.6
13.5 15.1 292.1
14.0 14.7 301.8
14.5 14.2 311.5
15.0 13.7 321.3
#147
Page 45 of 57387
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 15
Path Length
(KM)
Corridor Width
(m)
Maximum Obstruction Height
above Mean Sea Level (m)
15.5 13.1 331.2
16.0 12.4 341.2
16.5 11.6 351.4
17.0 10.6 361.6
17.5 9.6 372.0
18.0 8.2 382.5
18.5 6.8 393.2
19.0 6.8 403.2
19.1 6.8 405.2
19.2 6.8 407.2
19.3 (e) 6.8 409.2
Key specific points:
a. Network Centre;
b. Ponsonby Road;
c. Corner of Richmond Road and Chamberlain Street;
d. Corner of Old Mill Road and West View Road; and
e. Waiatarua.
2. Any significant increase in radio frequency energy levels from this source shall comply with any
statutory regulation controlling radio frequency exposure levels.
Attachments
Attachment 1: Cross-sections of Land Contour and Path Height (provided by Kordia for designation
3300)
#147
Page 46 of 57388
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 16
Attachment 2: Kordia Technical Paper on Corridor Dimension and Radio Frequency Emissions (provided by Kordia for designation 3300).
#147
Page 47 of 57389
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 17
TVC Microwave Transmission Corridor: Technical Briefing Paper
Statement of Professional Experience
1. My full name is Robert Ian Goodwin. I am employed by Kordia™ Limited as a
Senior Engineering Consultant.
2. I hold the qualification of Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical) and was a registered
engineer in terms of the (now replaced) Engineer’s Registration Act 1924 from
1971 until 2004.
3. I have over 30 years experience in the design and implementation engineering of
television, radio and satellite transmission systems and frequently undertake
consultancy work in these areas.
4. I have authority to give evidence on behalf of Kordia™ Limited in relation to the
notice of requirement that has been lodged by Kordia™ Limited for the effective
roll over the existing Designation of the Microwave Corridor from the TVNZ studios
in the Auckland CBD to the Waiatarua Broadcasting and Telecommunications
Facility on the Waitakere Ranges.
Statement of Professional Experience
5. My full name is Adam Charles Tommy. I am employed by Kordia™ Limited as a
Broadcast Network Architect.
6. I hold the qualification of Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical & Electronic). I am a
Chartered Professional Engineer and a Member of the Institute of Professional
Engineers New Zealand.
7. I have over 18 years’ experience in the design and implementation engineering of
television, radio and digital communications systems, and in the calculation and
analysis of electromagnetic radiation and fields.
8. I am a member of the joint Standards Australia / Standards New Zealand TE-007
technical committee for human exposure to electromagnetic fields. I am also a
member of the Ministry of Health’s Inter-agency committee on electromagnetic
radiation which provides advice to the Director General of Health. Through my
participation in these committees I have gained an understanding of potential
health effects that can be related to RF-field exposure. I am very familiar with the
New Zealand Standard for maximum exposure to radiofrequency fields (NZS
2772:1:1999).
#147
Page 48 of 57390
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 18
9. I have authority to give evidence on behalf of Kordia™ Limited in relation to the
notice of requirement that has been lodged by Kordia™ Limited for the effective
roll over the existing Designation of the Microwave Corridor from the TVNZ studios
in the Auckland CBD to the Waiatarua Broadcasting and Telecommunications
Facility on the Waitakere Ranges.
Importance of Corridor
10. Kordia provides networking facilities for most major broadcasters and ISP (Internet
Service Provider) entities in New Zealand. Their programme and data traffic is
carried by protected “ring” network architecture to all major provincial centres and
television transmitter sites in the North Island. Traffic for the South Island is
carried by this ring.
11. The ring consists of a fibre circuit between Auckland and Wellington on its eastern
side and a digital microwave (DMR) linking system between Auckland and
Wellington on its western side. There are local access points on both of these
routes.
12. The DMR linking system between the Television New Zealand (TVNZ) television
centre (referred to as TVC) in Victoria St and Kordia’s Waiatarua transmitter site
(WTA) on the Waitakere range forms an integral part of the protected ring referred
to above. The Microwave Transmission Corridor that this linking system “beam”
occupies has been Designated in the former Auckland City Council’s Isthmus and
Central Area District Plan’s and in the Waitakere City Council’s District Plan under
the Resource Management Act 1991. All three plans are now administered by the
Auckland Council.
13. As mentioned the network ring is used to distribute and provide linking for a
variety of important broadcasting and data services. In particular:
Distribution of TVNZ’s TV One and TV2 analogue television services to all major
transmitter sites in New Zealand (expected to be discontinued in 2013);
Distribution of the Freeview terrestrial digital television serve to the main
transmitter site in New Zealand (ongoing);
Linking of television services for TVNZ, TV Works and Triangle Television to the
Freeview satellite headend at Avalon (Lower Hutt) (ongoing);
Linking of television and radio services for Parliament TV and Radio New
Zealand to the Freeview terrestrial (DTT) headend at TVC (ongoing).
#147
Page 49 of 57391
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 19
Data traffic for most of the second-tier ISPs (Orcon, World Exchange, Compass
etc) (ongoing).
14. Should a fault occur on, say, the fibre route, traffic can be re-routed via the DMR
route to maintain continuity of services. Similarly the fibre provides protection
against a DMR link fault. If a simultaneous fault occurred on both routes a major
disruption to broadcasting and data services would occur. The same comment
applies if the second fault occurred before the first was fixed.
15. To maintain high network availability of this vital ring linking system it is essential
the availability of all the individual linking systems that form part of the ring is also
extremely high. This then reduces the likelihood of experiencing the catastrophic
consequences associated with a double failure, as mentioned above.
16. If a building or other structure obstructed the corridor the linking system would be
adversely affected, possibly to the point of being completely interrupted if a
significant part of the corridor cross-section was obstructed. This, in turn, would
put the total ring linking system at risk.
17. Hence Kordia Ltd regards the integrity of this transmission corridor to be
strategically important to its national network business and regards it essential
that all reasonable steps should be taken to preserve its integrity.
Technology Alternatives
18. One alternative to using the transmission corridor would be to establish a fibre
route between TVC and Waiatarua. A preliminary survey and route analysis was
undertaken in 1997 and based on this it is estimated it would cost $1.5 – 2.0
million to provide a fibre system with the necessary capacity. Allowing a further
$1.5 – 2.0 million for the fibre terminal equipment at both ends (16 x STM-1
circuits) the total cost would be in the range of $3 – 4 million. This costing
assumes no difficulties are encountered in obtaining the necessary local body
consents for such a fibre route.
19. Another alternative would be to establish a new radio terminal in the Auckland CBD
that could be used as an alternative to the TVC terminal. The installed cost for the
new microwave radio equipment, antenna support structure, antennas, power
system, fibre to connect to TVC is estimated at $2.0 – 3.0 million. This option
assumes a location could be found that has sufficient radio path clearance to not
require a designated transmission corridor from that new site to WTA.
20. Although technically feasible both of these alternatives are very expensive as they
need to be engineered to a standard that ensures Kordia continues to be a
#147
Page 50 of 57392
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 20
provider of high reliability linking services, able to compete in the network services
marketplace.
EMR Health Effects
21. As the microwave beam within the corridor passes, in general, well above ground
level the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) levels at street level will be extremely
low, even for people walking directly below the corridor. If a building was
constructed so that its roof height just “touched” the lower boundary of the
corridor and a person was standing on the roof of the building (effectively in the
path of the beam), then the EMR levels would be higher. This situation has been
analysed in the estimation of worst case levels in an area that the public could
have access to at any point along the corridor described here.
22. The maximum EMR power flux density that a person would be exposed to in the
situation described above is estimated at 40 µW/cm2 (microwatts per square
centimetre). This is 4% of the maximum permissible limit of 1,000 µW/cm2
specified in the New Zealand standard NZS 2772.1: 1999 for the frequency band
used by the linking transmitters.
23. This is the maximum EMR level expected along the corridor based on the situation
described above – most areas along the corridor would be much lower.
24. It can be confidently stated that no known adverse health effects will occur due
solely to the operation of this microwave link.
25. While there will be other existing RF services in the general vicinity of the
microwave corridor that will contribute EMR to the environment, and these EMR
levels have not been calculated, EMR levels in publicly accessible areas in the
Auckland city environment are expected to be low (in comparison with the public
limit in NZS 2772:1:1999), as is the maximum estimated level for this microwave
link.
26. If, as in paragraph 16, a building is built close to either end of the Microwave
Corridor that obstructs part or all of the Corridor, the EMR levels of a person
standing within the Corridor may approach the maximum EMR exposure limit for
the general public in the New Zealand Standard.
Validation of the Microwave Corridor Dimensions
27. The transmission corridor was first defined over 25 years ago. Since then the
frequency band the linking transmitters operate in has been lowered from 7.7 –
8.3 GHz (“W” band) to 6.4 – 7.1 GHz (“T” band). Although the lower frequency
#147
Page 51 of 57393
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 21
now being used requires a proportionately wider corridor clearance, the present
corridor dimensions would still be effective in protecting the microwave signal.
28. The dimensions on the attached table aggregate the tables defining the respective
sections of the Microwave Transmission Corridor previously recorded on the
respective district plans of the Waitakere City, Auckland City Isthmus and Central
Area District Plans.
Ian Goodwin
11 July 2012
Adam Tommy
12 July 2012
#147
Page 52 of 57394
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 22
The location
of the TVC is:
WGS84,
Longitude:
174.76120E,
Latitude: -
36.84827S.
Waiatarua
transmission
station
location:
Longitude:
174.56805E,
Latitude: -
36.92629S
Path Length
Total Corridor Width
Maximum Obstruction Height
F
r
o
m
T
V
C
Above Mean Sea Level
(km)
(m)
(m)
0
.
0
0
0
6
.
8
6
2
.
6
0
.
0
2
5
6
.
8
6
3
.
0
0
.
0
5
0
6
.
8
6
3
.
4
0
.
0
7
5
6
.
8
6
3
.
8
0
.
1
0
0
6
.
8
6
4
.
2
0
.
1
2
5
6
.
8
6
4
.
6
0
.
1
5
0
6
.
8
6
5
.
0
0
.
1
7
5
6
.
8
6
5
.
4
0
.
2
0
0
6
.
8
6
5
.
8
0
.
2
2
5
6
.
8
6
6
.
2
0
.
2
5
0
6
.
8
6
6
.
6
0
.
2
7
5
6
.
8
6
7
.
0
0
.
3
0
0
6
.
8
6
7
.
3
0
.
3
2
5
6
.
8
6
7
.
7
0
.
3
5
0
6
.
8
6
8
.
1
0
.
3
7
5
6
.
8
6
8
.
5
0
.
4
0
0
6
.
8
6
8
.
9
0
.
4
2
5
6
.
8
6
9
.
3
0
.
4
5
0
6
.
8
6
9
.
7
0
.
4
7
5
6
.
8
7
0
.
1
0
.
5
0
0
6
.
8
7
0
.
5
0
.
5
2
5
6
.
8
7
0
.
9
0
.
5
5
0
6
.
8
7
1
.
3
0
.
5
7
5
6
.
8
7
1
.
7
0
.
6
0
0
6
.
8
7
2
.
1
0
.
6
2
5
6
.
8
7
2
.
5
0
.
6
5
0
6
.
8
7
2
.
9
0
.
6
7
5
6
.
8
7
3
.
3
0
.
7
0
0
6
.
8
7
3
.
7
0
.
7
2
5
6
.
8
7
4
.
1
0
.
7
5
0
6
.
8
7
4
.
5
0
.
7
7
5
6
.
8
7
4
.
9
0
.
8
0
6
.
8
7
5
.
3
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.34 cm,Right: 13.21 cm, Space Before: 0 pt,Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, Linespacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.34 cm,Right: 13.21 cm, Line spacing: 1.5lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
#147
Page 53 of 57395
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 23
0
.
8
2
5
6
.
8
7
5
.
7
0
.
8
5
0
6
.
8
7
6
.
1
0
.
8
7
5
6
.
8
7
6
.
5
0
.
9
0
0
6
.
9
7
6
.
8
0
.
9
2
5
7
.
0
7
7
.
2
0
.
9
5
0
7
.
1
7
7
.
6
0
.
9
7
5
7
.
2
7
7
.
9
1
.
0
0
0
.
3
7
8
.
3
1
.
1
0
7
.
6
7
9
.
7
1
.
2
0
7
.
9
8
1
.
1
1
.
3
0
8
.
2
8
2
.
6
1
.
4
0
8
.
5
8
4
.
1
1
.
5
0
8
.
8
8
5
.
5
1
.
6
0
9
.
1
8
7
.
0
1
.
7
0
9
.
3
8
8
.
5
1
.
8
0
9
.
6
9
0
.
0
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent:Left: 1.34 cm, Right: 13.21 cm, SpaceBefore: 0 pt, Line spacing: 1.5 lines
#147
Page 54 of 57396
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 24
1
.
9
0
9
.
8
9
1
.
5
2
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
9
3
.
0
2
.
1
0
1
0
.
2
9
4
.
5
2
.
2
0
1
0
.
4
9
6
.
1
2
.
3
0
1
0
.
6
9
7
.
6
2
.
4
0
1
0
.
8
9
9
.
1
2
.
5
0
1
1
.
0
1
0
0
.
7
2
.
6
0
1
1
.
2
1
0
2
.
2
2
.
7
0
1
1
.
4
1
0
3
.
8
2
.
8
0
1
1
.
6
1
0
5
.
3
2
.
9
0
1
1
.
7
1
0
6
.
9
3
.
0
0
1
1
.
9
1
0
8
.
4
3
.
1
0
1
2
.
1
1
1
0
.
0
3
.
2
0
1
2
.
2
1
1
1
.
6
3
.
3
0
1
2
.
4
1
1
3
.
2
3
.
4
0
1
2
.
5
1
1
4
.
7
3
.
5
0
1
2
.
7
1
1
6
.
3
3
.
6
0
1
2
.
8
1
1
7
.
9
3
.
7
0
1
2
.
9
1
1
9
.
5
3
.
8
0
1
3
.
1
1
2
1
.
1
3
.
9
0
1
3
.
2
1
2
2
.
7
4
.
0
0
1
3
.
3
1
2
4
.
3
4
.
5
1
3
.
9
1
3
2
.
4
5
.
0
1
4
.
4
1
4
0
.
6
5
.
5
1
4
.
8
1
4
8
.
8
6
.
0
1
5
.
2
1
5
7
.
2
6
.
5
1
5
.
5
1
6
5
.
6
7
.
0
1
5
.
8
1
7
4
.
2
7
.
5
1
6
.
0
1
8
2
.
8
8
.
0
1
6
.
2
1
9
1
.
4
8
.
5
1
6
.
3
2
0
0
.
2
9
.
0
1
6
.
4
2
0
9
.
0
9
.
5
1
6
.
4
2
1
8
.
0
1
0
.
0
1
6
.
4
2
2
7
.
0
1
0
.
5
1
6
.
4
2
3
6
.
0
1
1
.
0
1
6
.
3
2
4
5
.
2
1
1
.
5
1
6
.
1
2
5
4
.
4
1
2
.
0
1
5
.
9
2
6
3
.
7
1
3
.
0
1
5
.
4
2
8
2
.
6
1
4
.
0
1
4
.
7
3
0
1
.
8
1
5
.
0
1
3
.
7
3
2
1
.
3
1
6
.
0
1
2
.
4
3
4
1
.
2
1
7
.
0
1
0
.
6
3
6
1
.
6
1
8
.
0
8
.
2
3
8
2
.
5
1
9
.
0
6
.
8
4
0
3
.
2
1
9
.
1
6
.
8
4
0
5
.
2
1
9
.
2
6
.
8
4
0
7
.
2
1
9
.
3
6
.
8
4
0
9
.
2
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
Formatted ...
#147
Page 55 of 57397
Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 25
8302 Satellite Earth Station Transmission Path
Designation Number 8302
Requiring Authority Television New Zealand Ltd (TVNZ)
Location 100 Victoria Street West to airspace north and west, Auckland Central
Rollover Designation Yes
Legacy Reference Designation 302, Auckland Council District Plan (Central Area Section) 2005 Designation B07-90, Auckland Council District Plan (Isthmus Section) 1999
Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date)
Description Satellite earth station transmission path - areas subject to height restrictions.
The areas subject to height restrictions are shown in diagram in Attachment 1.
Conditions 1. All masts, antennas, aerials and other radiocommunication facilities must comply with New Zealand
Standard NZS2772.1:1999 or any amendments, at all times.
Attachments
Attachment 1: TVNZ Satellite Earth Station Transmission Path - Proposed Building Height Limits
(Drawing 134706-SC01 RevA).
#147
Page 56 of 57398
Auc
klan
d U
nita
ry P
lan
Ope
rativ
e in
par
t 25
#147
Pag
e 57
of 5
739
9
![Fisheries & Treaty settlements: Auckland... • 1 Terry Lynch 28 October 2014 Place co-brand logo[s] here if required Fisheries & Treaty settlements: Auckland • 2 Overview • The](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5ea5e1a50ef7b871de4b02a0/fisheries-treaty-settlements-auckland-a-1-terry-lynch-28-october-2014.jpg)
