194
2016 Wisconsin Research Report of STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN Department of Agronomy College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

2016

Wisconsin Research Report of

STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR CORN

Department of Agronomy College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Page 2: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

2016 Wisconsin Research Report of Studies on Cultural Practices and Management Systems for Corn

Joe Lauer Corn Agronomist 358 Moore Hall (608) 263-7438

[email protected] http://corn.agronomy.wisc.edu

Kent Kohn Program Manager

566 Moore Hall (608) 262-1840

[email protected]

Thierno Diallo Research Specialist

566 Moore Hall (608) 262-1840

[email protected]

Agronomy Department University of Wisconsin

1575 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706

(608) 262-1390 The information presented in this report is for the purpose of informing cooperators in industry of the results of research conducted during 2016. The cooperation of other faculty and staff and the support of funding agencies and industry are gratefully acknowledged. The information presented in this report does not constitute recommendation or endorsement. This information is NOT FOR PUBLICATION unless prior approval is received. The assistance of the following people in conducting these studies is acknowledged. Graduate Research Assistants: Steve Vorsberg, Adam Gaspar and David Marburger Cooperating Faculty: Shawn Conley – Agronomy, Natalia de-Leon – Agronomy, Randy Shaver – Dairy Science, Carrie Laboski – Soil Science Cooperating UWEX County Agents and ARS Staff: Nick Baker, Jerry Clark, John Zander, Mike Bertram, Bill Meyer and Paul Sytsma Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and Dale Wagner Cooperating Academic Staff: John Gaska and Adam Roth Project Crew:Julian Cooper, Corey DeKeyser, McKenna Kelsey, Anna Kleinhans, and Travis Witt.

Page 3: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

. . We wish to thank the following companies and organizations that have generously

supported our research through financial and/or material donations. UW College of Agriculture and Life

Sciences- Hatch Program Ag Reliant Genetics LLC AgriGold Hybrids BASF Crop Protection Channel Seed Conklin Cornelius Seed Dahlman Seed Co. LLP Jung Seed Genetics LG Seeds Latham Hi-Tech Seed

Legacy Seed, Inc Monsanto Nu-Tech Seed, LLC Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Syngenta Crop Protection Syngenta Seeds Tracy Seeds Titan Pro SCI Valent BioSciences Wisconsin Corn Growers Association Wisconsin Fertilizer Research Council

Wisconsin Corn Agronomy Research Sites

Page 4: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Location Experiment Page Table Growing Conditions and Measurements 2016 Crop Summary 1 Arlington Daily Rainfall, Temperature and GDU Arlington 5 A-1Arlington Monthly Rainfall 1987-2016 Arlington 9 A-2Arlington Monthly Temperatures 1987-2016 Arlington 10 A-3Hancock Rainfall, Temperature and GDU Hancock 12 A-4Hancock Monthly Rainfall 1987-2016 Hancock 16 A-5Hancock Monthly Temperatures 1987-2016 Hancock 17 A-6Marshfield Rainfall, Temperature and GDU Marshfield 18 Marshfield Monthly Rainfall 1987-2016 Marshfield 19 A-7Marshfield Monthly Temperatures 1987-2016 Marshfield 20 A-8Observations, Data Collected, and 21 B-1Soils Information 23 B-2 Hybrid Growth & Development Arlington 01 24 1601-01,02 Montfort 01 30 1601-03 Marshfield 01 32 1601-04 Seymour 01 34 1601-05 Valders 01 36 1601-06 Hybrid Mixture Arlington 01 39 1601-07 Chippewa Falls 01 40 1601-08 Fond du Lac 01 41 1601-09 Galesville 01 42 1601-10 Hancock 01 43 1601-11 Janesville 01 44 1601-12 Marshfield 01 45 1601-13 Montfort 01 46 1601-14 Seymour 01 47 1601-15 Valders 01 48 1601-16 Arlington 01 50 1601-17Private Silage AgReliant Chippewa Falls 01 51 1601-18 Marshfield 01 53 1601-19 Valders 01 55 1601-20Plant Density Grain - Yield Data Arlington 02 58 1602-01Silage - Yield Data Arlington 02 59 1602-02, 03 Marshfield 02 64 1602-04 Montfort 02 66 1602-05 Valders 02 68 1602-06

Page 5: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Location Experiment Page Table Planting Date Corn and Silage Trial Arlington 03 70 1603-01,02,03 Row Spacing x Plant Density Silage – Yield Data Arlington 06 75 1606-01 Corn - Alfalfa Corn – Yield Data Arlington 09 78 1609-01Alfalfa – Yield Data Arlington 09 79 1609-02Silage – Yield Data Arlington 09 80 1609-03Corn – Yield Data Marshfield 09 82 1609-04Alfalfa – Yield Data Marshfield 09 83 1609-05Silage – Yield Data Marshfield 09 84 1609-06 Corn - Soybean Corn – Yield Data Arlington 09 86 1609-07Soybean – Yield Data Arlington 09 87 1609-08 Corn-Soybean-Wheat Rotation Study Corn – Yield Data Arlington 09 89 1609-09Silage – Yield Data Arlington 09 93 1609-10Soybean – Yield Data Arlington 09 94 1609-11Wheat – Yield Data Arlington 09 98 1609-12Corn – Yield Data Marshfield 09 103 1609-13Silage – Yield Data Marshfield 09 104 1609-14Soybean – Yield Data Marshfield 09 105 1609-15Wheat – Yield Data Marshfield 09 106 1609-16Corn – Yield Data Lancaster 09 108 1609-17Soybean – Yield Data Lancaster 09 110 1609-18Wheat – Yield Data Lancaster 09 111 1609-19Oats – Yield Data Lancaster 09 112 1609-20Alfalfa – Yield Data Lancaster 09 113 1609-21 Arysta Fungicide Trial Arlington 10 115 1610-01 Fond du Lac 10 117 1610-02 Galesville 10 119 1610-03 Marshfield 10 121 1610-04 Montfort 10 123 1610-05 Valders 10 125 1610-06

Page 6: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Location Experiment Page Table XiteBio Trial Arlington 11 127 1611-01 Fond du Lac 11 129 1611-02 Janesville 11 131 1611-033 Bar Trial Arlington 11 133 1611-04Nitrogen Trial Corn – Yield Data Arlington 12 135 1612-01,02Corn – Yield Data Hancock 12 140 1612-03,04Corn – Yield Data Marshfield 12 143 1612-05,06 Plant Growth Regulators Trial Ascend Arlington 14 146 1614-01 Chippewa Falls 14 148 1614-02 Coleman 14 150 1614-03 Fond du Lac 14 152 1614-04 Galesville 14 154 1614-05 Hancock 14 156 1614-06 Janesville 14 158 1614-07 Marshfield 14 160 1614-08 Montfort 14 162 1614-09 Seymour 14 164 1614-10 Valders 14 166 1614-11Valent Rhyzup – Yield Data Arlington 14 168 1614-15Snaplage/Earlage Arlington 15 170 1615-01 Thin Study Influence of Thinning on Corn Trial Arlington 16 172 1616-01 Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Corn – Yield Data Arlington 17 174 1617-01Soybean – Yield Data Arlington 17 176 1617-02 Systems Corn-Soybean Rotation Arlington 19 178 1619-01Continuous Corn Arlington 19 182 1619-02 BASF - Corn – Yield Data Arlington 19 187 1619-03

Page 7: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

2016 Corn Crop Summary for Wisconsin

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4‐Apr 25‐Apr 16‐May 6‐Jun 27‐Jun 18‐Jul 8‐Aug 29‐Aug 19‐Sep 10‐Oct 31‐Oct 21‐Nov

Percent Progress of Corn Crop

Bold lines= 2016Regular lines=  Normal (30 years)

Silking

Harvested

MatureSilage

Dent

Dough

Emerged

Planting

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

29‐May 12‐Jun 26‐Jun 10‐Jul 24‐Jul 7‐Aug 21‐Aug 4‐Sep 18‐Sep 2‐Oct 16‐Oct 30‐Oct

Percent Condition of Corn Crop

ExcellentGoodFairPoorVery Poor

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

5,000,000

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Grain yield (bu/A)Acreage Corn Acreage and Yield

Planted acresHarvested acres ‐  GrainHarvested acres ‐  SilageGrain yield

1

Page 8: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

CropProgressReviewof2016DerivedfromUSDA‐NASSreportsonDecember13,2016andJanuary12,2017

http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/Farm_Reporter/ Reviewofthe2016CropYear:

The2016plantingseasonopenedwithsoggyfieldconditionsandbelownormalsnowcoverduetoawarm,wetMarch.Wetsoilsinthenorthernportionsofthestatedelayedthestartoftillageandplantingthere.Butfieldsdriedupquicklyinthesouthernportionsofthestate,andwarm,sunnyweatherduringAprilacceleratedearlyfieldworkinthoseareas.AhardfrostduringtheweekendingMay15damagedsomefruitblossomsandemergingcrops,thoughmostnewplantingsbouncedbackquickly.RainfallwaspatchyandintermittentinMayandJune,providingplentyofdayssuitableforfieldwork.Plantingandemergenceofallthemajorcropstrendedslightlybehindthe2015pacebutwellaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.Hotweather,highhumidityandfrequentrainscharacterizedJuly,AugustandSeptember,boostingcropgrowthandkeepingcropsingoodtoexcellentconditionoverall.However,thefrequencyofrainsinthisperioddisruptedhayharvestandcontributedtomajorfloodingeventsinNorthernandWesternWisconsin.Severestormsdroppedupto10inchesofrainacrossvariouspartsofWisconsinduringthesemonths,causingdamagetocropsinlowlyingareas.Infrastructuredamageandveryhighsoilmoisturesassociatedwiththeserainsalsodisruptedaccesstofieldswhichwerenotdirectlydamagedbyflooding.Inall,8countiesdeclaredastateofemergencyduetofloodinginJulyandanother13countiesdeclaredemergenciesinSeptember.Abovenormaltemperaturesandrainyconditionscontinuedintothefall.Thoughcropdevelopmenttrendedaheadofaverageforallcropsduringthe2016season,harvestactivatesinSeptemberandOctobertrailedaveragesduetowetfieldconditionsandhighgrainmoistures.ThefirstfrostoftheseasonstruckthenorthernportionsofthestateduringtheweekendingOctober11,severalweekslaterthannormal.ThesouthernpartofthestatedidnotreceivethefirstfrostuntiltheweekendingNovember13.ThecityofLaCrossebrokeitsrecordforlatestfrosteverrecordedonNovember9,comparedtoNovember7,1900.Novemberbroughtanextendedstretchofdry,clearweatherandabovenormaltemperatures,allowingfarmerstocatchuponharvestandtillage.Falltillagewas86percentcompleteasofNovember27,2percentagepointsabovethepreviousyear.

StatewidetemperaturesstartedoffabovenormalwithMarchtemperatures6.3degreesabovenormal.AprilthroughSeptemberwere1.3degreesabovenormalin2016,comparedto0.9degreesabovenormalin2015.Aprilwastheonlymonththisseasonwithbelownormaltemperatures,averaging1.1degreesbelownormal.Theremaininggrowingseasonmonthsrangedfrom0.8degreesabovenormalinMayandJulyto3.9degreesabovenormalinSeptember.Octoberaveraged4.0degreesabovenormalandNovemberwas8.6degreesabovenormal.

PrecipitationtotalsforAprilthroughSeptemberwereabovenormalformuchofWisconsinbutbelownormalintheSoutheastDistrict.Thestatewidetotalwas27.34inches,3.54inchesabovethetotalfor2015and4.91inchesabovenormal.AprilandMayhadnormaltobelownormalprecipitationacrossthestate,whileJunethroughSeptemberhadabovenormalprecipitationonaverage.Septemberwasthemonthwiththegreatestdeparturefromnormal,with2.22inchesabovenormalforthestate.Bydistrict,departuresfromnormalforAprilthroughSeptemberrangedfrom0.89inchesbelownormalintheSoutheastDistrictto7.90inchesabovenormalintheSouthwestDistrict.

Corn

CornplantingproceededquicklythankstoanearlyspringthawandwrappedupinlateMay,morethantwoweeksearlierthanthefive‐yearaverage.ThereweresomereportsofnewlyemergedcorninjuredbylatethefrostduringtheweekendingMay15,thoughthecropreportedlybouncedbackeasilywithfavorableweatherinlateMayandJune.Warmtemperaturesandabundantmoisturekeptcorndevelopmentwellaheadofbothlastyearandthefive‐yearaveragethroughoutthesummer.Cornconditionaveraged86percentgoodtoexcellentfortheseason,comparedto80percentgoodtoexcellentin2015.FrequentrainsinAugustandSeptemberdelayedsilagechoppinginsomeareas,butoverallsilageharvestproceededabout5daysaheadofaverage,wrappinguparoundOctober23.Highplantmoisturesandmuddyfieldconditionskeptgrainharvestinlinewiththefive‐yearaveragethroughOctober.Clear,warmweatherinNovemberprovidedplentyofdayssuitableforfieldworkasfarmersworkedtowrapupfallharvest.Cornharvestedforgrainreached96percentharvestedonNovember27,withexcellentyieldsreportedacrossmostofthestate.Alackofstoragespaceforgrain,alongwithisolatedwetspots,meantsomepocketsofcornwerestillstandingattheendofNovember.

CornforgrainproductioninWisconsinduring2016isestimatedatarecordhigh573millionbushels,accordingtotheUSDA,NationalAgriculturalStatisticsServiceCropProduction2016Summaryreport.Thisestimateisup3percentfromtheNovember1forecastandup16percentfrom2015.Wisconsin'scornforgrainyieldisestimatedat178bushelsperacre,2bushelsbelowtheNovember1forecast.Thisisthehighestyieldonrecord,14bushelsabovethepreviousrecordsetin2015.Areaharvestedforgrainisestimatedat3.22millionacres,up120,000acresfromtheNovember1forecastand220,000acresabove2015.Cornplantedforallpurposesin2016isestimatedat4.05millionacres,down50,000acresfromtheNovember1estimatebut50,000above2015.

2

Page 9: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Cornforsilageproductionisestimatedat16.6milliontons,down12percentfrom2015.Thesilageyieldestimateof21.0tonsperacreis1.5tonshigherthan2015.Producersharvested790,000acresofcornforsilage,adecreaseof180,000acresfrom2015.Soybean

SoybeansplantingtookoffinearlyMay,andwrappedupinmid‐June,twoweeksaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.Theemergence,bloomingandsettingpodsstagesallranwellaheadofaverage,thankstowarmweatherandadequaterainfallinJuneandJuly.Soybeansconditionaveraged85percentgoodtoexcellentforJunethroughmid‐October,comparedto81percentgoodtoexcellentforthepreviousyear.FrequentrainsandoversaturatedsoilsinAugustandSeptemberpushedtheleavesturninganddroppingphasesbacktooneweekaheadofaverageinsteadoftwo.Therewereisolatedreportsofmoldandotherdiseasesaffectingsoybeansduetowetweatherinlatesummerandearlyfall,thoughyieldswerereportedlyabovenormalacrossmostofthestate.Soybeansharvestgotofftoalatestart,aswetconditionsdelayedfieldwork.StartinginSeptember,goodweatherallowedproducerstoget97percentofsoybeansharvestedbyNovember13,inlinewiththefive‐yearaverage.

Soybeanproductionisestimatedat107millionbushelsin2016,unchangedfromtheNovember1forecastbut16percentabove2015andanewrecordhigh.ThisisthefirstyearWisconsinproductionhasexceeded100millionbushels.Wisconsinsoybeangrowersaveragedarecordhigh55.0bushelsperacrein2016,equaltotheNovember1forecastbut5.5bushelsabovethe2015yield.Theharvestedacreageof1.95millionisunchangedfromtheNovember1estimatebut80,000acresabove2015.Soybeanplantedacreage,at1.96millionacres,isup4percentfrom2015.Soybeanplantedandharvestedacreagewerealsorecordhighs.

Oats

Oatsplantingin2016startedslightlybehindthefive‐yearaverage,butacceleratedquicklyaswetfieldsdriedout.Bothplantingandemergencewerecompletebymid‐Mayslightlybehindthe2015pacebutabouttwoweeksaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.Warmtemperaturesandabundantmoisturekepttheoatcropinverygoodconditionthroughouttheseason,averaging85percentgoodtoexcellentfromMay8throughAugust7.Oatsheadedoutaboutaweekaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.Frequentrainsslowedlate‐summerfieldwork,keepingharvestpaceclosetoboththeaverageandthepreviousyear.Oatswere98percentharvestedonSeptember11,only2percentagepointsaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.

Thisyear’searlysnowmeltallowedoatsplantingandemergencetoproceedmuchmorequicklythanthefive‐yearaverage,wrappingupnearlytwoweeksearly.TheheadingstageshowedsimilarlyrapidprogressthroughoutJune,thoughitwasonlyoneweekaheadofaverage.Bymid‐July,theoatsharvestwasslowtogetstarted,with

reportsofseverethunderstormsdamagingsmallgrainsduringtheweekendingJuly19.However,progresswasrapidoncecombininggotunderway;oatsreached97percentharvestedonSeptember6,threepercentagepointsaheadofthefive‐yearaverage.Winterwheat

WarmweatherinMarchhelpedthewinterwheatcropstartthisseasonwith79percentingoodtoexcellentcondition,wellabovethe52percentofwinterwheatingoodtoexcellentconditiononApril5,2015.WheatconditionsimprovedslowlybutsteadilydespitevariablesnowcoverandoccasionalfreezesduringAprilandearlyMay.Wheatconditionthencontinuedtoimprovethroughthesummermonths,averaging86percentgoodtoexcellentfortheseason.Thecropmaturedquicklywithwarm,dryweatherinJune,trendingatleastaweekaheadofthepreviousyear.HarvestactivitiesbegantheweekendingJuly10,alsoaweekaheadof2015,andreached98percentcompleteonAugust21.

Thoughfallplantingofthe2017cropstartedoutaheadofthepreviousyear’space,frequentrainsanddelaystootherfieldworkslowedprogressinSeptemberandOctober.Abovenormalfalltemperatureshelpedkeepthecropinverygoodconditiongoingintothewinterseason.Winterwheatconditionaveraged82percentgoodtoexcellentfrommid‐OctoberthroughtheendofNovember.

Alfalfa

AsofMay15,winterfreezedamagetoalfalfawasrated1percentsevere,3percentmoderateand19percentlight.Therewasnodamagetotheremaining77percentofalfalfastands,upfrom72percentundamagedthepreviousyear.Abundantheatandmoisturekeptalfalfagrowingquicklythroughoutthespringandsummer,thoughfrequentrainsinJuly,AugustandSeptemberinterferedwithbalingdryhay.Allfourcuttingsofalfalfaranaheadofboththefive‐yearaverageandthe2015hayingseason,replacing2015asthesecondfastestharvestpaceinthepast35years.Cuttingswerestillaboutaweekbehindtherecordearlyhayingseasonof2012,however.Warmfallweatherallowedwidespreadaccesstoafourthandevenfifthcropofalfalfa,andleftstandsingoodshapetooverwinter.Theseasonaverageforhayconditionwas87percentgoodtoexcellent,comparedto80percentgoodtoexcellentforthe2015season.Pastures

WarmweatherinMarchstartedWisconsin’spasturesinconsiderablybetterconditionthanaveragethisyear.OnApril3,51percentofpastureswereingoodtoexcellentconditioncomparedtoafive‐yearaverageof27percentgoodtoexcellent.ConditionplateauedafterlatefrostsduringtheweekendingMay15,butbegantotrendupwardagaininmid‐June.Pasturesaveraged75percentingoodtoexcellentconditionfromMaythroughOctober,comparedto69percentgoodtoexcellentin2015.UnusuallywarmweatherinOctoberandNovemberkeptpasturessuitableforgrazingwellintothefallseason.

3

Page 10: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tive

(in

ches

)

0

10

20

30

40

Dai

ly (

inch

es)

0

1

2

3

430-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily

Precipitation

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

De

gre

es (

F)

0

20

40

60

80

10030-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily Temperatures

Maximums

Minimums

Freeze line

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tiv

e (G

DU

s)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500D

aily

(G

DU

s)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

3530-yr Average = Bold Line

Growing Degree Units (modified - base= 50, max = 86)

2016 Weather Summary for Arlington, WI

Source: Midwest Region Climatological Center.

4

Page 11: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF

92 1-Apr 0.36 5.8 158 57 36 47 33 0 5893 2-Apr 0.10 5.9 179 41 34 49 28 0 5894 3-Apr 0.03 5.9 223 57 33 38 24 0 5895 4-Apr 0.00 5.9 134 49 34 71 27 11 6996 5-Apr 0.00 5.9 167 47 33 36 21 0 6997 6-Apr 0.38 6.3 63 49 37 41 23 0 6998 7-Apr 0.03 6.4 81 43 35 46 31 0 6999 8-Apr 0.08 6.4 131 43 34 39 30 0 69

100 9-Apr 0.03 6.5 270 54 31 38 12 0 69101 10-Apr 0.00 6.5 81 50 34 39 22 0 69102 11-Apr 0.03 6.5 274 52 35 50 33 0 69103 12-Apr 0.00 6.5 276 60 33 46 25 0 69104 13-Apr 0.00 6.5 73 47 38 50 27 0 69105 14-Apr 0.00 6.5 268 65 35 49 31 0 69106 15-Apr 0.00 6.5 277 71 38 65 35 8 76107 16-Apr 0.00 6.5 240 76 43 71 39 11 87108 17-Apr 0.00 6.5 268 82 48 79 46 15 101109 18-Apr 0.00 6.5 234 82 52 79 50 15 116110 19-Apr 0.00 6.5 74 60 50 80 42 15 131111 20-Apr 0.06 6.6 222 74 47 56 42 3 134112 21-Apr 0.00 6.6 215 78 57 72 42 11 145113 22-Apr 0.00 6.6 177 72 51 70 46 10 155114 23-Apr 0.00 6.6 267 77 44 59 32 5 159115 24-Apr 0.00 6.6 137 72 50 65 40 8 167116 25-Apr 0.02 6.6 208 76 52 70 45 10 177117 26-Apr 0.00 6.6 97 58 46 76 37 13 190118 27-Apr 0.00 6.6 153 59 42 48 33 0 190119 28-Apr 0.18 6.8 41 48 43 56 37 3 193120 29-Apr 0.17 6.9 156 61 42 42 36 0 193121 30-Apr 0.00 6.9 53 49 43 53 36 2 194122 1-May 0.40 7.3 95 57 44 50 40 0 194123 2-May 0.01 7.3 284 71 42 57 37 4 198124 3-May 0.00 7.3 232 66 42 64 40 7 205125 4-May 0.09 7.4 198 60 45 67 41 9 213126 5-May 0.00 7.4 282 77 39 60 32 5 218127 6-May 0.00 7.4 246 82 49 67 39 9 227128 7-May 0.14 7.6 74 52 85 51 18 245129 8-May 0.00 7.6 296 84 46 69 37 10 254130 9-May 0.00 7.6 72 52 72 42 11 265131 10-May 0.13 7.7 57 53 68 42 9 274132 11-May 0.95 8.6 67 52 51 47 1 275133 12-May 0.15 8.8 231 74 52 65 47 8 282134 13-May 0.00 8.8 135 62 46 67 43 9 291135 14-May 0.16 9.0 119 51 39 58 36 4 295136 15-May 0.00 9.0 274 62 37 43 29 0 295137 16-May 0.00 9.0 225 70 40 57 30 4 298138 17-May 0.10 9.1 0 32 32 70 39 10 308139 18-May 0.00 9.1 317 80 43 61 36 6 314140 19-May 0.00 9.1 305 82 47 67 43 9 322141 20-May 0.00 9.1 231 79 50 72 44 11 333142 21-May 0.00 9.1 263 83 52 73 46 12 345143 22-May 0.00 9.1 309 91 56 79 51 15 360144 23-May 0.00 9.1 294 88 59 84 53 19 378145 24-May 0.00 9.1 228 88 61 82 58 20 398146 25-May 0.00 9.1 224 89 65 83 59 21 419147 26-May 0.01 9.1 84 60 22 441148 27-May 0.15 9.2 84 60 22 463149 28-May 0.29 9.5 80 61 21 484

inches

Daily SolarRadiationDay of year

Table A-1. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Arlington Research Station.

PrecipitationSoil Temperature

at 2 inchesAir

TemperatureGrowing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

5

Page 12: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Daily SolarRadiationDay of year

Table A-1. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Arlington Research Station.

PrecipitationSoil Temperature

at 2 inchesAir

TemperatureGrowing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

150 29-May 0.85 10.4 83 60 22 505151 30-May 0.00 10.4 77 57 17 522152 31-May 0.01 10.4 82 61 22 544153 1-Jun 0.44 10.8 80 60 20 564154 2-Jun 0.00 10.8 80 52 16 580155 3-Jun 0.00 10.8 73 52 13 592156 4-Jun 0.00 10.8 85 59 22 614157 5-Jun 0.00 10.8 79 57 18 632158 6-Jun 0.15 11.0 79 51 15 647159 7-Jun 0.00 11.0 235 80 64 73 49 12 659160 8-Jun 0.00 11.0 325 92 56 67 46 9 667161 9-Jun 0.00 11.0 184 87 64 74 54 14 681162 10-Jun 0.49 11.4 290 95 68 78 54 16 697163 11-Jun 0.40 11.8 277 94 70 91 63 25 722164 12-Jun 0.00 11.8 197 84 66 88 55 21 742165 13-Jun 0.00 11.8 272 94 63 71 52 12 754166 14-Jun 0.01 11.9 268 98 68 81 57 19 773167 15-Jun 1.71 13.6 290 96 72 85 63 24 797168 16-Jun 0.00 13.6 123 78 68 87 62 24 821169 17-Jun 0.00 13.6 326 97 63 71 56 14 834170 18-Jun 0.00 13.6 314 112 66 85 60 23 857171 19-Jun 0.00 13.6 324 101 69 87 61 24 880172 20-Jun 0.04 13.6 297 101 76 88 70 28 908173 21-Jun 0.00 13.6 330 100 69 86 54 20 928174 22-Jun 0.00 13.6 168 95 73 80 60 20 948175 23-Jun 0.00 13.6 122 87 71 80 61 21 969176 24-Jun 0.00 13.6 314 102 67 73 53 13 982177 25-Jun 0.00 13.6 288 103 73 83 60 22 1003178 26-Jun 1.16 14.8 278 96 74 90 66 26 1029179 27-Jun 0.00 14.8 305 92 70 85 64 25 1054180 28-Jun 0.00 14.8 270 96 67 78 53 16 1069181 29-Jun 0.00 14.8 304 99 64 72 51 12 1081182 30-Jun 0.00 14.8 240 98 66 79 51 15 1096183 1-Jul 0.43 15.2 304 90 66 80 54 17 1113184 2-Jul 0.00 15.2 289 96 65 72 55 14 1126185 3-Jul 0.00 15.2 295 103 64 76 50 13 1139186 4-Jul 0.00 15.2 144 89 66 78 51 15 1154187 5-Jul 0.00 15.2 259 105 74 75 59 17 1171188 6-Jul 0.58 15.8 289 94 76 86 63 25 1195189 7-Jul 0.00 15.8 170 93 71 81 62 22 1217190 8-Jul 0.98 16.8 272 32 32 83 65 24 1241191 9-Jul 0.00 16.8 306 32 32 80 58 19 1260192 10-Jul 0.00 16.8 222 32 32 80 56 18 1278193 11-Jul 0.14 16.9 295 32 32 79 64 22 1299194 12-Jul 0.02 16.9 237 32 32 90 69 28 1327195 13-Jul 0.01 16.9 227 32 32 83 65 24 1351196 14-Jul 0.00 16.9 284 32 32 86 63 25 1375197 15-Jul 0.08 17.0 173 32 32 81 55 18 1393198 16-Jul 0.00 17.0 295 32 32 71 49 11 1404199 17-Jul 0.42 17.4 238 32 32 80 59 20 1423200 18-Jul 0.00 17.4 283 32 32 83 60 22 1445201 19-Jul 0.00 17.4 259 32 32 84 58 21 1466202 20-Jul 0.00 17.4 222 32 32 87 64 25 1491203 21-Jul 0.00 17.4 174 32 32 86 70 28 1519204 22-Jul 1.39 18.8 264 32 32 93 66 26 1545205 23-Jul 0.03 18.8 49 32 32 90 69 28 1572206 24-Jul 1.52 20.4 187 32 32 82 68 25 1597207 25-Jul 0.00 20.4 299 32 32 89 70 28 1625

6

Page 13: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Daily SolarRadiationDay of year

Table A-1. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Arlington Research Station.

PrecipitationSoil Temperature

at 2 inchesAir

TemperatureGrowing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

208 26-Jul 0.00 20.4 284 32 32 83 61 22 1647209 27-Jul 0.00 20.4 259 32 32 86 64 25 1672210 28-Jul 0.02 20.4 104 32 32 87 65 26 1698211 29-Jul 0.03 20.4 63 32 32 77 61 19 1717212 30-Jul 0.84 21.3 236 32 32 72 58 15 1732213 31-Jul 0.00 21.3 288 32 32 78 53 16 1747214 1-Aug 0.00 21.3 234 32 32 81 59 20 1767215 2-Aug 0.00 21.3 200 32 32 82 59 21 1788216 3-Aug 0.29 21.5 243 32 32 85 62 24 1811217 4-Aug 0.02 21.6 210 32 32 89 69 28 1839218 5-Aug 1.18 22.7 275 32 32 88 56 21 1860219 6-Aug 0.00 22.7 264 32 32 79 57 18 1878220 7-Aug 0.00 22.7 209 32 32 78 58 18 1896221 8-Aug 0.00 22.7 268 32 32 78 53 16 1911222 9-Aug 0.00 22.7 250 32 32 81 60 21 1932223 10-Aug 0.00 22.7 224 32 32 86 62 24 1956224 11-Aug 0.00 22.7 134 32 32 87 68 27 1983225 12-Aug 0.58 23.3 85 32 32 84 70 27 2010226 13-Aug 0.74 24.1 192 32 32 79 66 23 2032227 14-Aug 0.04 24.1 237 32 32 80 57 19 2051228 15-Aug 0.00 24.1 191 32 32 83 59 21 2072229 16-Aug 0.00 24.1 251 32 32 82 61 22 2093230 17-Aug 0.33 24.4 248 32 32 86 60 23 2116231 18-Aug 0.00 24.4 237 32 32 84 62 23 2139232 19-Aug 0.38 24.8 61 32 32 87 63 25 2164233 20-Aug 0.44 25.3 181 32 32 80 63 22 2185234 21-Aug 0.11 25.4 203 32 32 75 55 15 2200235 22-Aug 0.00 25.4 258 32 32 71 47 11 2211236 23-Aug 0.00 25.4 244 32 32 78 54 16 2227237 24-Aug 0.37 25.7 159 32 32 81 58 20 2246238 25-Aug 0.01 25.7 212 32 32 83 60 22 2268239 26-Aug 0.00 25.7 172 32 32 79 54 17 2284240 27-Aug 0.87 26.6 73 32 32 74 58 16 2300241 28-Aug 0.10 26.7 162 32 32 73 59 16 2316242 29-Aug 0.00 26.7 185 32 32 79 61 20 2336243 30-Aug 0.00 26.7 185 32 32 84 64 24 2360244 31-Aug 0.00 26.7 239 32 32 83 58 21 2381245 1-Sep 0.00 26.7 217 32 32 76 57 17 2397246 2-Sep 0.00 26.7 231 32 32 72 50 11 2408247 3-Sep 0.00 26.7 218 32 32 75 46 13 2421248 4-Sep 0.00 26.7 207 32 32 77 52 15 2435249 5-Sep 0.00 26.7 216 32 32 80 59 20 2455250 6-Sep 0.00 26.7 188 32 32 87 68 27 2482251 7-Sep 1.68 28.4 47 32 32 90 66 26 2508252 8-Sep 0.88 29.3 181 32 32 73 66 20 2527253 9-Sep 0.00 29.3 110 32 32 82 53 18 2545254 10-Sep 0.29 29.6 138 32 32 74 56 15 2560255 11-Sep 0.06 29.6 216 32 32 71 47 11 2570256 12-Sep 0.00 29.6 221 32 32 76 47 13 2583257 13-Sep 0.27 29.9 48 32 32 78 51 15 2598258 14-Sep 0.05 29.9 152 32 32 70 52 11 2609259 15-Sep 0.00 29.9 187 32 32 76 52 14 2623260 16-Sep 0.19 30.1 111 32 32 76 53 15 2637261 17-Sep 0.02 30.2 188 32 32 78 54 16 2653262 18-Sep 0.00 30.2 207 32 32 75 51 13 2666263 19-Sep 0.00 30.2 131 32 32 80 54 17 2683264 20-Sep 0.67 30.8 199 32 32 82 49 16 2699265 21-Sep 0.53 31.4 19 32 32 82 50 16 2715

7

Page 14: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Daily SolarRadiationDay of year

Table A-1. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Arlington Research Station.

PrecipitationSoil Temperature

at 2 inchesAir

TemperatureGrowing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

266 22-Sep 1.18 32.5 88 32 32 70 57 14 2729267 23-Sep 0.02 32.6 51 32 32 76 60 18 2747268 24-Sep 0.00 32.6 93 32 32 69 59 14 2761269 25-Sep 0.00 32.6 102 32 32 72 57 15 2775270 26-Sep 0.08 32.6 177 32 32 80 48 15 2790271 27-Sep 0.00 32.6 93 32 32 67 46 9 2799272 28-Sep 0.21 32.8 108 32 32 60 44 5 2804273 29-Sep 0.03 32.9 179 32 32 62 47 6 2810274 30-Sep 0.00 32.9 29 32 32 72 47 11 2821275 1-Oct 0.10 33.0 44 32 32 62 54 8 2829276 2-Oct 0.03 33.0 63 32 32 61 54 8 2836277 3-Oct 0.01 33.0 184 32 32 63 45 7 2843278 4-Oct 0.00 33.0 78 32 32 72 45 11 2854279 5-Oct 0.00 33.0 104 32 32 73 54 14 2867280 6-Oct 0.08 33.1 71 32 32 74 50 12 2879281 7-Oct 0.40 33.5 126 32 32 70 53 12 2891282 8-Oct 0.00 33.5 168 32 32 63 34 7 2897283 9-Oct 0.00 33.5 169 32 32 61 35 6 2903284 10-Oct 0.00 33.5 152 32 32 63 40 7 2909285 11-Oct 0.00 33.5 122 32 32 71 41 11 2920286 12-Oct 0.02 33.5 17 32 32 74 53 14 2933287 13-Oct 0.19 33.7 153 32 32 60 31 5 2938288 14-Oct 0.00 33.7 148 32 32 53 31 2 2940289 15-Oct 0.00 33.7 26 32 32 63 33 7 2946290 16-Oct 0.13 33.8 100 32 32 65 51 8 2954291 17-Oct 0.00 33.8 37 32 32 73 49 12 2966292 18-Oct 0.00 33.8 149 32 32 76 58 17 2983293 19-Oct 0.00 33.8 90 32 32 70 42 10 2993294 20-Oct 0.00 33.8 101 32 32 69 42 10 3002295 21-Oct 0.00 33.8 108 32 32 51 33 1 3003296 22-Oct 0.00 33.8 131 32 32 51 34 1 3003297 23-Oct 0.00 33.8 139 32 32 62 35 6 3009298 24-Oct 0.00 33.8 141 32 32 70 40 10 3019299 25-Oct 0.00 33.8 60 32 32 57 32 4 3023300 26-Oct 1.83 35.7 9 32 32 52 34 1 3024301 27-Oct 0.53 36.2 37 32 32 46 38 0 3024302 28-Oct 0.00 36.2 45 35 0 3024303 29-Oct 0.00 36.2 139 32 32 62 40 6 3030304 30-Oct 0.04 36.2 69 32 32 64 46 7 3037305 31-Oct 0.01 36.2 66 32 32 55 35 3 3039

8

Page 15: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 0.5 0.0 1.9 2.6 4.7 0.6 4.0 4.9 4.9 1.6 4.9 1.4 32.2

1988 2.1 1.0 1.3 3.3 1.0 1.5 1.6 2.9 3.9 2.2 1.5 1.2 23.4

1989 0.7 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.8 2.0 3.8 4.3 3.8 2.4 1.3 0.5 24.3

1990 1.8 0.9 3.7 2.5 4.3 6.3 1.6 5.4 1.2 2.3 1.7 2.4 34.2

1991 1.0 0.4 3.0 4.5 1.9 2.6 3.8 1.8 4.7 6.8 3.6 1.4 35.4

1992 0.5 1.6 1.7 4.0 1.2 1.2 5.8 1.9 7.5 1.3 5.2 2.8 34.6

1993 1.6 1.0 2.3 7.1 4.5 6.1 9.4 3.2 4.2 1.2 1.6 0.2 42.3

1994 0.9 2.0 0.1 2.3 2.0 7.9 6.1 4.0 4.7 0.5 2.8 0.8 34.0

1995 1.3 0.1 2.2 3.4 6.0 2.2 2.8 5.0 1.8 4.2 2.4 0.7 31.9

1996 1.8 0.5 0.3 2.6 3.2 7.8 2.4 2.8 0.9 3.3 0.8 1.6 28.0

1997 0.7 2.8 2.2 2.0 3.3 4.9 6.3 3.2 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.8 30.0

1998 1.2 0.9 3.3 4.0 4.1 6.8 2.1 6.7 3.0 3.4 1.6 0.3 37.4

1999 2.8 1.2 0.6 6.0 3.9 5.3 3.4 2.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 30.9

2000 1.0 2.3 1.4 3.4 10.5 7.2 3.4 3.3 3.1 0.7 1.5 1.5 39.3

2001 0.8 1.4 0.4 3.1 4.7 7.0 2.9 5.3 5.2 1.7 1.7 1.4 35.8

2002 0.5 1.1 0.8 3.4 3.2 4.3 2.9 3.7 1.9 4.0 2.1 0.6 28.7

2003 0.4 0.2 1.4 2.2 3.8 3.3 3.3 1.8 4.0 1.3 5.3 1.9 28.9

2004 0.3 1.2 2.7 1.9 10.3 4.1 4.3 3.0 0.5 3.3 1.6 1.6 34.8

2005 1.5 1.2 1.8 0.8 3.4 1.5 4.4 3.1 4.7 0.6 3.8 1.0 27.6

2006 1.6 0.6 2.1 5.1 4.3 4.5 4.1 6.1 5.4 3.2 1.7 0.9 39.6

2007 0.5 1.5 3.2 3.3 1.2 3.3 2.9 11.3 2.8 2.3 0.5 3.3 36.3

2008 2.9 2.6 2.8 9.3 3.3 13.8 5.1 1.9 1.6 3.4 1.3 1.8 49.8

2009 0.4 1.7 4.8 4.3 3.6 4.3 2.3 3.2 2.4 4.6 1.3 2.8 35.5

2010 1.7 1.1 1.0 3.7 4.2 7.6 9.3 4.7 4.5 1.7 1.4 1.7 42.5

2011 0.6 0.7 3.4 3.5 1.6 4.1 2.5 1.5 3.9 1.6 3.3 2.4 28.9

2012 0.8 1.0 2.5 3.1 2.9 0.3 4.3 2.9 1.0 4.0 1.1 2.5 26.3

2013 2.3 1.9 2.4 5.4 6.0 7.5 3.0 1.8 3.0 1.5 2.6 1.1 38.5

2014 0.7 1.0 1.0 6.4 2.8 9.3 1.9 3.7 1.8 2.7 1.7 1.1 34.3

2015 0.4 1.0 0.4 6.4 4.4 3.1 3.2 4.3 5.7 2.0 4.9 3.4 39.1

2016 0.8 0.4 4.3 1.5 3.4 4.4 6.5 5.5 6.2 3.4 1.6 1.3 39.2

30-year Average

1.1 1.1 2.0 3.8 3.8 4.8 4.0 3.9 3.4 2.5 2.2 1.5 34.1

Table A-2. Monthly and total precipitation (inches) data for the Arlington Research Station.

9

Page 16: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 23 31 38 51 61 71 74 68 62 45 40 27 49

1988 13 18 35 47 63 72 75 75 64 45 37 24 47

1989 28 15 30 46 57 66 73 70 60 51 33 13 45

1990 28 26 37 49 55 68 70 69 64 49 40 21 48

1991 14 26 36 50 63 70 71 70 59 49 29 24 47

1992 24 28 33 43 58 64 66 64 59 47 31 22 45

1993 19 19 29 42 57 64 69 69 55 46 33 23 44

1994 6 13 33 46 56 68 67 67 64 53 40 28 45

1995 20 23 37 44 57 72 73 76 60 52 29 21 47

1996 16 22 29 44 55 68 69 70 62 51 30 23 45

1997 17 24 33 42 51 68 69 65 61 50 32 27 45

1998 23 33 33 48 62 66 71 71 65 51 39 30 50

1999 15 30 35 48 60 68 75 67 59 48 43 25 48

2000 20 29 41 45 61 65 69 71 62 54 34 10 47

2001 20 17 30 51 59 67 72 71 59 48 46 31 48

2002 26 27 29 46 54 69 75 70 64 44 34 27 47

2003 17 17 32 44 56 66 71 72 61 49 35 28 46

2004 14 22 37 47 56 65 69 64 65 50 39 24 46

2005 17 27 30 50 54 72 73 70 65 50 36 17 47

2006 29 21 34 50 57 66 73 69 58 44 38 29 48

2007 21 13 37 43 60 68 70 70 62 53 33 17 46

2008 15 14 27 45 53 66 70 67 61 47 34 14 43

2009 8 21 31 43 56 64 63 64 60 42 38 18 42

2010 14 19 36 49 57 66 71 70 58 50 36 15 45

2011 13 18 28 41 54 65 73 68 57 49 36 27 44

2012 21 27 46 44 59 68 76 67 58 45 34 25 47

2013 16 17 22 39 56 64 68 67 60 46 31 13 42

2014 6 8 22 41 55 67 65 69 60 48 28 27 41

2015 18 9 33 47 59 66 69 68 66 51 41 34 47

2016 18 25 38 45 58 69 71 71 64 52 43 21 48

30-year Average

18 21 33 46 57 67 71 69 61 49 36 23 46

Table A-3. Average monthly and annual temperature (oF) data for the Arlington Research Station.

10

Page 17: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tive

(in

ches

)

0

10

20

30

40

Dai

ly (

inch

es)

0

1

2

3

430-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily

Precipitation

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

De

gre

es (

F)

0

20

40

60

80

10030-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily Temperatures

Maximums

Minimums

Freeze line

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tiv

e (G

DU

s)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500D

aily

(G

DU

s)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

3530-yr Average = Bold Line

Growing Degree Units (modified - base= 50, max = 86)

2016 Weather Summary for Hancock, WI

Source: Midwest Region Climatological Center.

11

Page 18: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF

92 1-Apr 0.17 7.6 154 51 32 45 27 0 5293 2-Apr 0.00 7.6 179 35 32 36 18 0 5294 3-Apr 0.07 7.6 158 53 32 58 24 4 5695 4-Apr 0.00 7.6 128 47 32 30 27 0 5696 5-Apr 0.00 7.6 172 51 30 35 18 0 5697 6-Apr 0.25 7.9 71 51 33 43 27 0 5698 7-Apr 0.13 8.0 95 44 33 45 31 0 5699 8-Apr 0.13 8.1 132 42 32 39 27 0 56

100 9-Apr 0.01 8.1 251 54 31 34 20 0 56101 10-Apr 0.00 8.1 132 54 33 38 14 0 56102 11-Apr 0.00 8.1 180 53 34 56 30 3 59103 12-Apr 0.00 8.1 263 63 31 42 23 0 59104 13-Apr 0.00 8.1 122 59 37 50 29 0 59105 14-Apr 0.00 8.1 259 68 36 51 35 1 60106 15-Apr 0.00 8.1 270 72 40 66 41 8 68107 16-Apr 0.00 8.1 238 74 44 70 45 10 78108 17-Apr 0.00 8.1 232 77 48 77 51 14 92109 18-Apr 0.00 8.1 220 78 51 80 50 15 107110 19-Apr 0.00 8.1 82 60 51 82 42 16 123111 20-Apr 0.03 8.2 212 73 48 52 43 1 124112 21-Apr 0.05 8.2 168 76 52 70 48 10 134113 22-Apr 0.10 8.3 198 73 49 71 42 11 144114 23-Apr 0.00 8.3 242 74 43 60 36 5 149115 24-Apr 0.07 8.4 70 61 49 64 43 7 156116 25-Apr 0.00 8.4 179 76 47 70 39 10 166117 26-Apr 0.00 8.4 84 57 43 70 36 10 176118 27-Apr 0.00 8.4 183 63 40 47 33 0 176119 28-Apr 0.01 8.4 53 50 42 53 39 2 177120 29-Apr 0.45 8.9 193 64 41 41 37 0 177121 30-Apr 0.03 8.9 91 55 41 56 36 3 180122 1-May 0.00 8.9 161 66 43 52 42 1 181123 2-May 0.00 8.9 271 76 39 58 30 4 185124 3-May 0.00 8.9 214 72 44 65 38 8 193125 4-May 0.19 9.1 283 70 43 70 40 10 203126 5-May 0.00 9.1 298 76 41 61 30 6 208127 6-May 0.00 9.1 254 81 51 68 42 9 217128 7-May 0.01 9.1 279 78 55 88 46 18 235129 8-May 0.00 9.1 298 79 50 70 40 10 245130 9-May 0.00 9.1 233 76 52 71 40 11 256131 10-May 0.10 9.2 44 60 51 69 47 10 265132 11-May 0.30 9.5 70 63 51 48 46 0 265133 12-May 0.11 9.6 170 72 52 56 48 3 268134 13-May 0.00 9.6 94 59 45 65 44 8 276135 14-May 0.19 9.8 149 56 38 52 39 1 277136 15-May 0.00 9.8 231 62 35 42 30 0 277137 16-May 0.00 9.8 290 75 44 58 24 4 281138 17-May 0.00 9.8 299 76 46 69 36 10 290139 18-May 0.00 9.8 319 79 46 62 33 6 296140 19-May 0.00 9.8 300 81 50 68 33 9 305141 20-May 0.00 9.8 302 82 52 73 40 12 317142 21-May 0.00 9.8 297 84 54 74 43 12 329143 22-May 0.00 9.8 307 88 56 81 43 16 344144 23-May 0.00 9.8 297 89 60 85 43 18 362145 24-May 0.00 9.8 196 87 62 84 57 21 382146 25-May 0.00 9.8 184 88 60 83 54 19 401147 26-May 1.20 11.0 232 87 60 78 60 19 420148 27-May 0.07 11.1 135 80 61 82 57 20 439149 28-May 0.02 11.1 173 85 66 76 53 15 454

inches

Table A-4. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Hancock Research Station.

Precipitation Daily SolarRadiation

Soil Temperatureat 2 inches

AirTemperature

Growing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

Day of year

12

Page 19: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Table A-4. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Hancock Research Station.

Precipitation Daily SolarRadiation

Soil Temperatureat 2 inches

AirTemperature

Growing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

Day of year

150 29-May 0.30 11.4 197 81 62 81 57 19 473151 30-May 0.02 11.4 319 92 59 77 55 16 489152 31-May 0.00 11.4 192 88 64 81 55 18 507153 1-Jun 0.79 12.2 269 89 64 75 61 18 525154 2-Jun 0.00 12.2 244 85 59 79 52 16 540155 3-Jun 0.00 12.2 284 91 57 71 48 11 551156 4-Jun 0.64 12.8 174 85 62 83 56 20 570157 5-Jun 0.50 13.3 266 87 60 74 51 13 583158 6-Jun 0.46 13.8 227 78 58 77 51 14 597159 7-Jun 0.05 13.8 211 78 55 69 49 10 606160 8-Jun 0.00 13.8 334 87 53 66 45 8 614161 9-Jun 0.00 13.8 217 87 60 72 51 12 626162 10-Jun 0.18 14.0 77 60 19 644163 11-Jun 0.41 14.4 90 64 25 669164 12-Jun 0.00 14.4 88 58 22 691165 13-Jun 0.00 14.4 72 56 14 705166 14-Jun 0.10 14.5 67 55 11 716167 15-Jun 0.45 15.0 78 60 19 735168 16-Jun 0.00 15.0 735169 17-Jun 0.00 15.0 70 53 12 747170 18-Jun 0.00 15.0 83 58 21 767171 19-Jun 0.00 15.0 260 96 76 84 58 21 788172 20-Jun 0.00 15.0 305 96 70 87 58 22 810173 21-Jun 0.00 15.0 312 95 64 81 51 16 826174 22-Jun 0.00 15.0 192 95 67 80 57 19 845175 23-Jun 0.05 15.0 104 77 64 79 57 18 863176 24-Jun 0.00 15.0 322 98 59 70 50 10 873177 25-Jun 0.00 15.0 284 103 69 89 63 25 897178 26-Jun 0.00 15.0 305 94 70 85 66 26 923179 27-Jun 0.00 15.0 263 91 69 75 54 15 938180 28-Jun 0.00 15.0 329 92 68 75 56 16 953181 29-Jun 0.00 15.0 308 93 64 73 49 12 965182 30-Jun 0.00 15.0 153 86 64 78 53 16 980183 1-Jul 0.28 15.3 322 89 60 77 51 14 994184 2-Jul 0.00 15.3 304 93 61 72 50 11 1005185 3-Jul 0.00 15.3 265 90 63 78 50 14 1019186 4-Jul 0.00 15.3 184 84 63 78 52 15 1034187 5-Jul 0.00 15.3 278 101 68 75 54 15 1049188 6-Jul 0.27 15.6 272 94 71 88 65 26 1074189 7-Jul 0.01 15.6 165 86 70 85 62 24 1098190 8-Jul 0.18 15.8 249 94 69 80 65 23 1120191 9-Jul 0.00 15.8 321 96 65 81 55 18 1138192 10-Jul 0.00 15.8 161 83 68 80 58 19 1157193 11-Jul 0.00 15.8 284 102 70 81 55 18 1175194 12-Jul 0.22 16.0 263 98 73 90 65 26 1201195 13-Jul 0.00 16.0 260 99 71 85 66 26 1226196 14-Jul 0.05 16.0 178 90 69 88 65 26 1252197 15-Jul 0.05 16.1 178 82 64 79 58 19 1270198 16-Jul 0.00 16.1 225 90 60 71 50 11 1281199 17-Jul 0.64 16.7 191 87 65 80 60 20 1301200 18-Jul 0.03 16.8 305 94 66 86 58 22 1323201 19-Jul 0.00 16.8 283 95 70 83 60 22 1344202 20-Jul 0.00 16.8 211 91 73 86 65 26 1370203 21-Jul 0.03 16.8 132 92 70 87 72 29 1399204 22-Jul 1.01 17.8 302 96 70 90 64 25 1424205 23-Jul 0.19 18.0 115 85 71 90 63 25 1448206 24-Jul 0.09 18.1 168 89 73 83 66 25 1473207 25-Jul 0.00 18.1 305 94 69 90 61 24 1496

13

Page 20: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Table A-4. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Hancock Research Station.

Precipitation Daily SolarRadiation

Soil Temperatureat 2 inches

AirTemperature

Growing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

Day of year

208 26-Jul 0.00 18.1 289 95 69 82 59 21 1517209 27-Jul 0.00 18.1 166 90 67 87 65 26 1542210 28-Jul 0.80 18.9 108 77 69 83 64 24 1566211 29-Jul 0.02 18.9 102 77 66 71 59 15 1581212 30-Jul 0.00 18.9 230 85 67 72 60 16 1597213 31-Jul 0.00 18.9 299 91 64 77 52 15 1611214 1-Aug 0.00 18.9 276 92 69 81 52 17 1628215 2-Aug 0.00 18.9 231 91 71 81 64 23 1650216 3-Aug 0.00 18.9 265 98 72 84 67 26 1676217 4-Aug 0.00 18.9 151 96 74 91 70 28 1704218 5-Aug 0.67 19.6 272 88 69 86 63 25 1728219 6-Aug 0.00 19.6 269 90 65 77 54 16 1744220 7-Aug 0.00 19.6 245 88 66 78 55 17 1760221 8-Aug 0.00 19.6 284 91 65 79 53 16 1776222 9-Aug 0.00 19.6 228 91 70 80 64 22 1798223 10-Aug 0.00 19.6 232 94 72 86 66 26 1824224 11-Aug 0.00 19.6 160 88 73 89 66 26 1850225 12-Aug 0.36 19.9 114 83 73 87 69 28 1878226 13-Aug 1.08 21.0 215 87 70 79 66 23 1900227 14-Aug 0.00 21.0 247 89 66 79 58 19 1919228 15-Aug 0.00 21.0 217 88 66 83 56 20 1938229 16-Aug 0.00 21.0 225 89 69 80 60 20 1958230 17-Aug 0.29 21.3 254 90 69 85 62 24 1982231 18-Aug 0.00 21.3 236 91 69 86 63 25 2006232 19-Aug 0.54 21.8 134 82 71 86 66 26 2032233 20-Aug 0.35 22.2 82 75 65 79 57 18 2050234 21-Aug 0.00 22.2 164 78 63 71 52 12 2062235 22-Aug 0.00 22.2 260 84 59 79 50 15 2076236 23-Aug 0.00 22.2 233 85 66 77 60 19 2095237 24-Aug 1.96 24.1 86 76 67 80 66 23 2118238 25-Aug 0.05 24.2 216 83 66 78 60 19 2137239 26-Aug 0.00 24.2 190 79 63 79 53 16 2153240 27-Aug 0.10 24.3 56 70 65 72 58 15 2168241 28-Aug 0.12 24.4 193 82 67 64 62 13 2181242 29-Aug 0.00 24.4 180 84 69 80 58 19 2200243 30-Aug 0.00 24.4 224 88 70 83 65 24 2224244 31-Aug 0.00 24.4 242 85 64 83 50 17 2240245 1-Sep 0.00 24.4 199 80 64 77 51 14 2254246 2-Sep 0.00 24.4 249 83 62 72 48 11 2265247 3-Sep 0.00 24.4 213 81 61 74 47 12 2277248 4-Sep 0.00 24.4 197 82 64 75 58 17 2294249 5-Sep 0.00 24.4 160 83 66 77 60 19 2312250 6-Sep 0.00 24.4 132 84 70 86 71 29 2341251 7-Sep 3.04 27.5 73 78 70 86 67 27 2367252 8-Sep 0.32 27.8 185 83 66 74 65 20 2387253 9-Sep 0.00 27.8 48 68 63 78 53 16 2402254 10-Sep 0.35 28.1 105 72 59 68 50 9 2411255 11-Sep 0.00 28.1 224 77 56 67 46 9 2420256 12-Sep 0.00 28.1 219 78 60 74 46 12 2432257 13-Sep 0.36 28.5 60 70 62 77 60 19 2450258 14-Sep 0.02 28.5 166 73 60 77 52 15 2465259 15-Sep 0.00 28.5 203 77 59 70 54 12 2477260 16-Sep 0.12 28.6 68 71 64 75 59 17 2494261 17-Sep 0.66 29.3 161 76 61 71 54 13 2506262 18-Sep 0.00 29.3 208 76 58 73 50 12 2518263 19-Sep 0.00 29.3 96 72 60 77 50 14 2531264 20-Sep 0.21 29.5 191 76 57 74 49 12 2543265 21-Sep 2.12 31.6 48 70 60 81 56 19 2562

14

Page 21: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Daily Total Max Min Max Min Daily TotalW m-2 oF oF inches

Table A-4. Daily Precipitation, Solar Radiation, Soil and Air Temperatures and Growing Degree Units at the Hancock Research Station.

Precipitation Daily SolarRadiation

Soil Temperatureat 2 inches

AirTemperature

Growing DegreeUnits (86/50 oF)

Day of year

266 22-Sep 3.60 35.2 118 74 63 72 61 17 2578267 23-Sep 0.00 35.2 100 71 63 75 58 17 2595268 24-Sep 0.08 35.3 86 70 63 66 57 12 2606269 25-Sep 0.00 35.3 86 72 61 68 58 13 2619270 26-Sep 0.20 35.5 153 67 56 75 50 13 2632271 27-Sep 0.00 35.5 51 60 54 63 49 7 2638272 28-Sep 0.17 35.7 95 63 55 55 48 3 2641273 29-Sep 0.01 35.7 190 69 53 62 47 6 2647274 30-Sep 0.00 35.7 42 62 56 71 51 11 2658275 1-Oct 0.00 35.7 63 65 59 61 55 8 2666276 2-Oct 0.10 35.8 144 69 57 65 50 8 2673277 3-Oct 0.00 35.8 167 68 53 69 44 10 2683278 4-Oct 0.00 35.8 69 65 57 68 51 10 2692279 5-Oct 0.00 35.8 84 67 57 69 56 13 2705280 6-Oct 0.06 35.8 93 66 54 70 49 10 2715281 7-Oct 0.02 35.9 106 63 51 70 46 10 2725282 8-Oct 0.00 35.9 162 60 47 66 38 8 2733283 9-Oct 0.00 35.9 171 61 46 54 32 2 2735284 10-Oct 0.00 35.9 156 64 50 58 32 4 2739285 11-Oct 0.00 35.9 116 65 56 71 47 11 2749286 12-Oct 0.03 35.9 20 57 47 73 54 14 2763287 13-Oct 0.26 36.1 102 54 45 55 34 3 2765288 14-Oct 0.02 36.2 139 57 43 48 35 0 2765289 15-Oct 0.00 36.2 19 58 50 60 48 5 2770290 16-Oct 0.02 36.2 132 66 54 64 54 9 2779291 17-Oct 0.00 36.2 50 68 59 71 54 13 2792292 18-Oct 0.02 36.2 137 66 53 75 52 14 2805293 19-Oct 0.00 36.2 118 63 49 68 40 9 2814294 20-Oct 0.00 36.2 112 56 48 67 37 9 2823295 21-Oct 0.00 36.2 77 54 47 50 38 0 2823296 22-Oct 0.00 36.2 136 58 46 47 36 0 2823297 23-Oct 0.00 36.2 129 58 44 59 34 5 2827298 24-Oct 0.00 36.2 141 56 43 66 36 8 2835299 25-Oct 0.00 36.2 88 52 42 55 30 3 2838300 26-Oct 1.31 37.5 13 48 45 51 38 1 2838301 27-Oct 0.27 37.8 46 50 45 44 38 0 2838302 28-Oct 0.00 37.8 63 54 46 44 39 0 2838303 29-Oct 0.00 37.8 60 56 50 61 44 6 2844304 30-Oct 0.07 37.9 108 57 46 57 42 4 2847305 31-Oct 0.00 37.9 67 52 46 50 36 0 2847

15

Page 22: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 0.6 0.3 1.5 2.8 2.9 6.7 2.3 1.4 3.1 1.8 3.4 1.2 28.1

1988 1.4 0.3 1.4 1.9 1.0 1.2 5.5 4.0 4.8 1.9 3.3 0.7 27.3

1989 0.3 0.4 1.8 0.5 7.3 2.1 3.0 1.7 1.5 4.3 1.4 0.3 24.6

1990 1.0 0.6 2.9 2.0 4.8 8.1 3.9 6.4 2.9 2.7 1.0 2.1 38.6

1991 0.7 0.4 2.8 4.6 6.5 1.3 3.9 1.8 3.3 3.6 4.4 1.5 34.6

1992 0.7 0.6 2.4 2.8 2.5 1.7 4.2 3.2 7.9 1.4 4.4 2.2 34.0

1993 1.1 0.6 0.9 5.0 5.7 6.9 9.0 5.3 2.7 2.0 2.0 0.3 41.5

1994 1.4 1.1 0.8 5.1 1.5 3.7 6.8 3.8 2.8 0.9 1.6 0.3 29.9

1995 0.7 0.3 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.0 2.3 7.8 2.5 4.7 1.9 0.5 31.2

1996 2.6 1.1 1.2 3.7 1.7 6.9 4.6 2.1 1.2 2.8 1.1 1.3 30.3

1997 1.1 0.9 2.0 0.9 4.5 3.5 8.0 3.2 3.4 1.5 0.4 0.6 29.9

1998 1.7 1.3 4.5 1.6 3.0 6.4 2.5 5.1 2.3 1.8 1.9 0.4 32.5

1999 2.1 1.7 0.3 5.9 3.3 3.7 10.7 4.5 1.3 2.4 1.4 0.6 37.8

2000 1.2 0.9 1.1 3.8 5.1 6.9 2.3 4.6 3.5 0.6 2.6 1.5 34.1

2001 1.3 1.4 0.8 3.6 7.2 4.1 2.7 4.6 4.6 2.1 2.0 0.8 35.1

2002 0.4 2.2 2.2 4.1 2.9 16.5 3.2 4.3 3.0 3.3 0.2 0.4 42.7

2003 0.7 0.6 2.0 1.5 5.3 3.4 2.3 0.7 2.9 1.1 3.6 1.5 25.5

2004 0.9 1.1 3.0 1.5 7.2 7.7 2.7 3.6 0.5 3.3 1.9 1.2 34.5

2005 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.4 3.0 3.9 5.8 3.5 4.0 1.6 3.2 0.6 31.0

2006 1.1 0.7 0.8 5.0 5.8 1.5 2.7 2.9 3.8 2.0 1.7 1.6 29.7

2007 1.1 0.9 2.4 2.4 3.8 1.8 2.7 8.9 2.9 4.6 0.1 0.9 32.3

2008 1.6 1.9 0.5 5.5 2.9 6.5 4.5 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.6 2.4 33.7

2009 0.5 1.1 1.9 3.7 4.6 2.7 2.2 3.4 0.6 5.0 1.3 2.4 29.4

2010 0.8 0.4 0.6 2.6 3.6 7.2 10.6 5.4 4.4 1.3 1.4 0.9 39.3

2011 0.6 1.0 2.2 4.8 3.3 3.7 3.0 2.1 6.3 1.9 2.2 1.1 32.3

2012 0.6 0.3 2.8 3.4 6.0 1.9 0.6 2.9 1.1 5.5 1.4 1.9 28.4

2013 1.2 1.1 1.7 3.9 5.0 5.3 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.1 0.8 30.0

2014 1.1 0.9 1.1 8.9 2.2 6.8 1.7 6.5 4.3 2.9 1.6 1.0 39.0

2015 0.3 0.2 0.4 3.7 5.6 4.3 1.8 3.1 4.8 3.2 2.2 1.6 31.2

2016 1.0 0.5 5.9 1.5 2.5 3.6 3.9 5.5 11.3 2.2 2.1 1.4 41.3

30-year Average

1.0 0.9 1.9 3.4 4.1 4.7 4.0 3.9 3.4 2.5 2.0 1.1 33.0

Table A-5. Monthly and total precipitation (inches) data for the Hancock Research Station.

16

Page 23: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 21 29 37 51 62 70 74 68 61 43 38 26 48

1988 12 14 32 46 63 72 74 74 63 44 37 20 46

1989 25 14 27 44 56 66 73 69 60 51 31 11 44

1990 28 24 36 49 55 68 70 69 64 49 40 19 48

1991 13 25 34 49 63 70 70 70 58 49 29 23 46

1992 22 28 31 42 59 64 65 65 59 47 31 21 45

1993 17 18 30 41 58 64 69 70 55 48 32 23 44

1994 6 14 34 47 59 69 68 66 63 52 38 27 45

1995 19 20 34 41 57 71 72 74 59 50 26 18 45

1996 12 19 25 42 54 67 67 69 61 49 26 20 43

1997 14 23 31 43 50 67 68 64 61 49 31 26 44

1998 20 31 31 48 63 64 70 69 66 49 38 26 48

1999 12 27 33 47 59 66 73 66 59 47 41 22 46

2000 15 27 38 43 59 64 68 69 60 53 31 6 44

2001 19 16 29 50 57 66 71 70 58 46 45 28 46

2002 26 25 26 45 52 68 73 69 63 43 32 25 46

2003 14 14 30 43 55 65 70 72 62 48 34 26 45

2004 11 21 35 46 55 64 69 64 65 50 39 23 45

2005 15 26 28 50 54 71 72 70 65 50 36 19 46

2006 30 20 33 51 58 67 74 70 58 45 39 29 48

2007 23 13 36 44 61 69 71 70 62 54 34 18 47

2008 17 15 26 45 54 66 70 68 62 48 35 14 43

2009 7 22 31 43 57 65 64 66 62 43 41 20 44

2010 15 20 37 51 59 67 72 72 58 50 36 16 46

2011 12 18 27 42 55 65 74 70 58 51 38 27 45

2012 22 28 48 46 62 69 77 69 59 46 36 25 49

2013 19 17 24 38 58 64 71 69 62 47 32 14 43

2014 9 7 22 41 56 69 66 69 60 46 26 25 41

2015 18 9 33 46 59 65 69 68 66 50 41 33 46

2016 16 27 38 44 56 66 71 70 64 52 42 21 47

30-year Average

17 20 32 45 57 67 71 69 61 48 35 22 45

Table A-6. Average monthly and annual temperature (oF) data for the Hancock Research Station.

17

Page 24: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tive

(in

ches

)

0

10

20

30

40

Dai

ly (

inch

es)

0

1

2

3

430-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily

Precipitation

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

De

gre

es (

F)

0

20

40

60

80

10030-yr Average = Bold Line

Daily Temperatures

Maximums

Minimums

Freeze line

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Cu

mm

ula

tiv

e (G

DU

s)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500D

aily

(G

DU

s)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

3530-yr Average = Bold Line

Growing Degree Units (modified - base= 50, max = 86)

2016 Weather Summary for Marshfield, WI

Source: Midwest Region Climatological Center.

18

Page 25: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 0.7 0.0 1.4 1.3 1.9 3.0 6.1 2.6 2.5 1.3 2.8 1.5 25.1

1988 1.1 0.2 1.5 1.9 3.2 1.1 2.3 3.7 3.2 1.4 3.5 0.6 23.8

1989 0.5 0.4 2.5 0.8 7.0 1.9 2.5 3.1 1.1 2.6 1.5 0.3 24.2

1990 0.8 0.6 4.2 3.4 3.9 5.5 2.6 6.9 2.9 2.6 1.0 1.9 36.4

1991 0.4 0.7 2.5 4.4 6.5 2.2 5.7 2.1 5.1 1.8 5.8 1.5 38.6

1992 0.5 0.7 2.1 2.8 3.8 1.8 4.0 2.7 8.0 1.0 4.0 1.5 33.1

1993 1.4 0.2 1.6 4.1 5.2 8.7 3.5 6.5 3.8 2.0 1.7 0.4 39.2

1994 0.8 0.6 0.3 4.4 1.0 2.3 7.7 2.1 4.9 1.4 2.5 0.3 28.3

1995 0.6 0.4 2.5 2.3 2.8 1.1 2.2 8.9 2.2 5.1 1.8 0.5 30.2

1996 2.5 0.5 1.8 3.1 2.6 8.6 2.0 2.0 2.8 3.1 2.8 1.4 33.1

1997 1.8 0.4 2.0 0.5 3.0 3.4 5.1 6.5 3.1 3.2 0.3 0.6 29.9

1998 1.8 1.7 2.2 1.9 3.1 8.6 0.5 3.2 0.6 2.8 1.5 0.3 28.0

1999 1.9 1.0 0.2 5.7 3.5 1.8 8.3 3.7 1.4 1.2 1.8 0.4 30.9

2000 1.4 0.5 2.0 1.9 3.7 7.5 2.3 4.0 4.7 0.3 2.0 1.3 31.5

2001 0.9 1.2 0.6 3.6 5.7 6.1 3.2 3.9 4.1 1.9 2.5 1.1 34.8

2002 0.3 1.9 2.7 3.3 3.1 9.0 2.7 6.0 6.5 3.8 0.1 0.3 39.8

2003 0.4 0.8 1.9 3.1 3.9 2.8 1.5 0.9 2.2 1.1 2.1 1.5 22.4

2004 0.7 1.4 2.8 1.3 8.7 4.2 1.9 2.5 1.6 4.2 1.6 1.8 32.6

2005 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.9 3.3 1.7 3.2 6.7 0.9 2.9 0.7 26.3

2006 0.9 0.4 1.6 1.6 4.1 2.2 2.1 4.2 2.5 2.5 1.3 2.1 25.5

2007 0.9 1.0 1.7 1.9 4.7 2.7 3.3 9.7 3.8 4.8 0.1 1.0 35.7

2008 1.3 1.1 0.6 5.8 3.3 3.4 3.2 1.3 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.2 27.8

2009 0.4 0.7 1.3 3.3 3.9 3.7 2.5 7.3 0.4 6.2 0.5 1.8 31.8

2010 0.9 0.3 0.7 1.0 3.6 6.8 11.1 4.4 9.0 2.4 2.9 2.0 45.0

2011 0.7 0.6 1.9 3.0 3.2 4.1 8.2 2.7 3.6 2.3 0.9 1.3 32.5

2012 1.2 1.1 1.3 2.3 3.8 3.6 1.3 4.1 1.7 5.8 1.2 1.7 29.1

2013 1.3 1.4 1.8 4.3 6.6 4.7 2.4 1.1 3.3 7.2 1.9 1.3 37.3

2014 1.4 1.5 0.8 5.2 4.8 5.2 3.0 6.9 3.1 3.5 2.2 1.6 39.1

2015 0.5 0.2 0.4 3.6 5.0 5.2 2.9 3.1 6.6 2.3 2.7 5.0 37.3

2016 0.7 0.7 4.8 1.8 2.9 6.6 4.3 3.9 6.0 2.2 1.9 2.1 37.6

30-year Average

1.0 0.8 1.8 2.8 4.0 4.4 3.7 4.1 3.6 2.8 2.0 1.3 32.2

Table A-7. Monthly and total precipitation (inches) data for the Marshfield Research Station.

19

Page 26: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual

1987 21 28 36 51 60 69 72 68 61 42 38 26 48

1988 12 14 31 46 60 69 74 73 61 43 35 19 45

1989 22 12 26 43 55 65 72 69 59 50 29 9 43

1990 25 21 34 47 54 67 69 68 62 47 38 19 46

1991 12 23 33 49 61 70 69 69 57 47 27 20 45

1992 20 26 30 42 59 64 66 66 59 48 32 21 44

1993 17 19 30 42 57 63 70 70 55 48 32 22 44

1994 6 15 34 46 59 69 69 66 63 52 38 27 46

1995 19 20 35 41 57 71 73 74 59 49 26 18 45

1996 12 18 25 42 54 68 68 70 60 49 27 19 43

1997 13 23 28 42 50 67 68 64 60 48 30 26 43

1998 20 31 32 48 62 64 71 69 64 49 37 25 48

1999 12 26 32 48 59 67 73 67 58 46 40 22 46

2000 15 24 38 43 58 63 68 68 58 51 32 8 44

2001 19 13 27 45 56 63 71 70 57 46 43 27 45

2002 23 26 24 43 51 67 73 67 62 42 32 23 44

2003 13 11 29 43 55 64 69 71 60 46 32 25 43

2004 10 20 32 45 53 62 68 62 64 48 36 19 43

2005 13 24 27 48 53 70 71 68 63 50 33 17 45

2006 26 17 31 49 56 66 73 68 56 42 36 25 46

2007 19 11 34 43 59 67 69 68 61 53 32 14 45

2008 13 11 23 42 53 64 69 67 60 47 34 12 41

2009 6 20 30 44 57 65 65 66 62 42 40 19 43

2010 16 22 38 51 58 66 72 71 57 51 35 18 46

2011 12 18 27 41 55 65 74 70 57 50 36 24 44

2012 19 25 45 45 59 67 75 68 58 45 34 24 47

2013 16 16 24 37 56 64 70 68 61 47 30 12 42

2014 5 5 18 40 56 68 67 67 59 46 25 24 40

2015 14 7 31 46 57 65 69 66 65 48 39 31 45

2016 14 21 36 42 56 66 70 69 62 50 42 19 46

30-year Average

15 19 31 44 57 66 70 68 60 47 34 20 44

Table A-8. Average monthly and annual temperature (oF) data for the Marshfield Research Station.

20

Page 27: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Observations and Data Collected STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All data are analyzed using generally accepted statistical tests. In most cases the probabilities of main effects and interactions are shown. The number listed is a percent probability that the effect difference is due to chance (i.e. not due to treatment). A Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference (LSD) is calculated for all main effect probabilities of 10 percent or less. Table B-1. Observations and Data Collected

Corn Measurements AGI (Adjusted Gross Income)

Units $/acre Formula (weighted price per bushel x yield)

- (yield x (handling + hauling + trucking)) -(storage x 0.02) - (yield x (grain moisture-15.5) x drying).

Determination Handling cost = $0.02 per bushel Hauling cost = $0.04 per bushel Trucking cost = $0.11 $ per bushel (100 miles) On-farm drying cost = $0.02 per point per bushel Storage = (yield*0.25 *4) + (yield*0.25*8); On-farm $0.02/bu. 30days Weighted Price per Bushel = $3.44 per bushel = (50% December Average Cash price) + (25% March CBOT Futures price) + (25% July CBOT Futures price). December Average Cash price derived from Wisconsin Ag Statistics; CBOT Futures prices derived from closing price on first business day in December.

Grain Yield Units Bu/acre Formula (43560/(plot width * plot length in

feet)) * weight of sample in lbs.* ((100-sample moisture)/(100-15.5{moisture standard}))/56 lb/bu

Moisture Units % Determination GRAIN: determined by Harvest

Master unit on combine or wet weight method and adjusted to standard corn moisture 15.5% WHOLE PLANT: moisture of subsample of chopped whole plant moisture of subsample of chopped stover (whole plant less ears)

Test Weight Units lbs/bushel Determination weight of known volume

converted to lbs/bushel Plant Height Units inches or centimeters

Determination plant height from soil surface to top leaf (flag) canopy.

Observations average of several plants in each plot

Ear Height Units inches Determination height from soil surface to base of

ear Observations average of several plants in each

plot Broken Stalks Units %

Determination at harvest Observations number of stalks broken below

the ear + number of plants lodged at >45% from the whole plot (22' x 2 rows)

Formula (broken stalks + lodged plants)/total stalks x 100%

Table B-1. Observations and Data Collected Kernel Mass Units mg/seed

Determination weight of 100 seeds converted to mg/seed

Plant Density Units plants per acre Determination Early = plants at v3-v5 stage

Late = just prior to harvest Observations plant counts on whole plot (22' x 2

rows) Ear Density Units Ears per acre

Determination Just prior to harvest Observations taken

Ear counts are taken from whole plot (22' x 2 rows)

Leaf Development

Units none Determination count of leaf number Observations LEAF COLLARS: total number of

visible leaf collars HAIL ADJUSTERS: total number of drooping leaves TOTAL: total number of leaves visible

Starch (Grain) Units % Determination Near Infra-Red Transmittance

Spectroscopy using a global calibration equation from Foss

Observations Plot subsample Protein (Grain) Units %

Determination Near Infra-Red Transmittance Spectroscopy using a global calibration equation from Foss

Observations Plot subsample Oil (Grain) Units %

Determination Near Infra-Red Transmittance Spectroscopy using a global calibration equation from Foss

Observations Plot subsample Ethanol (Grain)

Units % Determination Near Infra-Red Transmittance

Spectroscopy using a global calibration equation from Pioneer

Observations Plot subsample Diseases ratings

Units Rating score = 1-9 1,2,3= Worst; 4,5,6= Mid; 7,8,9= Best

Determination Based on amount of disease on plant part of interest

Observations Plot measured in the field Forage Yield (Whole Plant)

Units Tons of dry mater per acre Formula weight of sample in lbs.*

(43560/(2000*plot width * plot length in feet)).* ((100-sample moisture)/100)

Kernel Milk Units % Determination percent milk remaining in kernel

at harvest Observations visual average of three ears from

a non-harvest row Kernel Milk Rating (KMR)

Formula % Kernel Milk x 5 Scale 0-5

Stover Moisture

Formula % Greenness x Leaf Rating (Leaf Rating scale 1-5, Based on % of

21

Page 28: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table B-1. Observations and Data Collected Rating (SMR) upright leaves)

Scale 0-5 Visual Moisture Rating (VMR)

Formula KMR + SMR Scale 0-10

Crude Protein (CP)

Units % Determination wet lab or NIRS procedure on plot

sub sample Neutral Detergent Fiber

Units % Determination wet lab or NIRS procedure on plot

sub sample Neutral Detergent Fiber Digestibility

Units % Determination wet lab or NIRS procedure on plot

sub sample

Acid Detergent Fiber

Units % Determination wet lab or NIRS procedure on plot

sub sample In Vitro Digestibility

Units % Determination In vitro wet lab or NIRS procedure

on plot sub sample Starch content Units %

Determination wet lab or NIRS on plot sub sample

Kernel Rot Units none Determination visual average of 5 plants at V2-

V4 Scale 1=deterioration

2=no deterioration Emergence Units %

Formula Early stand / late stand count x 100%

Residue cover Units % Determination Point transects centered on row.

% Survival Units % Formula Early stand / late stand count x

100% Root Rating Determination The ISU 0 to 3 node-injury root

rating scale was used. A rating of 0.50 or below is considered acceptable economic root protection.

Scale 0-3 Soybean Measurements

AGI (Adjusted Gross Income)

Units $/acre Formula (weighted price per bushel x yield)

- (yield x (handling + hauling + trucking)) -(storage x 0.02).

Determination Handling cost = $0.02 per bushel Hauling cost = $0.04 per bushel Trucking cost = $0.11 $ per bushel (100 miles) Storage = (yield*0.25*4)+ (yield*0.25*8); On-farm $0.02/bu. 30days. Weighted Price per Bushel = $8.48 per bushel = (50% December Average Cash price) + (25% March CBOT Futures price) + (25% July CBOT Futures price). December Average Cash price derived from Wisconsin Ag Statistics; CBOT Futures prices derived from closing price on first business day in December.

Grain Yield Units Bu/acre

Table B-1. Observations and Data Collected Formula (43560/(plot width * plot length in

feet)) * weight of sample in lbs.* ((100-sample moisture)/(100-13{moisture standard}))/60 lb/bu

Grain Moisture Units % Determination determined by detector on

combine 13% is standard soybean moisture

Plant Height Units inches Determination plant height from soil surface to

tip of main stem Observations average of several plants in each

plot Plant Lodging Units none

Determination based on average erectness of main stem of plant

Observations whole plot is assessed Scale 1=ALL PLANTS ERECT

2=SLIGHT LODGING 3=PLANTS LODGED AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE 4=PLANTS LODGED AT 60-80 DEGREE ANGLE

Seed Weight Units seeds/lb Determination weight of 300 seeds converted to

seeds/lb Plant Density Units plants per acre

Determination early = plants at V3 to V5 stage late = just prior to harvest

Observations plants counts are taken from 5 linear feet of plot X the harvested area

% Survival Units % Formula Early stand / late stand count x

100% Wheat Measurements

AGI (Adjusted Gross Income)

Units $/acre Formula (weighted price per bushel x yield)

– (yield x (handling + hauling + trucking)) -(storage x 0.02).

Determination Handling cost = $0.02 per bushel Hauling cost = $0.04 per bushel Trucking cost = $0.11 $ per bushel (100 miles) Storage = (yield*0.25*4)+ (yield*0.25*8); On-farm $0.02/bu. 30days. Weighted Price per Bushel = $3.73 per bushel = (50% December Average Cash price) + (25% March CBOT Futures price) + (25% July CBOT Futures price). December Average Cash price derived from Wisconsin Ag Statistics; CBOT Futures prices derived from closing price on first business day in December.

Grain Yield Units Bu/acre Formula (43560/(plot width * plot length in

feet)) * weight of sample in lbs.* ((100-sample moisture)/(100-13.5{moisture standard}))/60 lb/bu

Grain Moisture Units % Determination Determined by sensor on

combine 13.5% is standard wheat moisture

22

Page 29: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Soils Information Table B-2.

Location

Lat - Long Soil Series Soil Family Soil Subgroup Arlington ARS 43 o 18 ’- 89o 21’

Plano silt loam (predominant soil)

Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Agriudoll

Ringwood silt loam Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic

Typic Argiudoll

Saybrook silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Argiudoll Radford silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Fluvaquentic Hapludoll Sable silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquoll Huntsville silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Cumulic Hapludoll Elburn silt loam Fine-silty, mixed mesic Aquic Argiudoll Channahon silt loam Loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Argiudoll Hancock ARS 44 o 7 ‘ - 89 o 32 ‘

Plainfield loamy sand (Predominant soil)

Mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamment

Sparta loamy sand Sandy, mixed, mesic Entic Hapludoll Lancaster ARS 42 o 50 ‘ - 90 o 47 ‘

Fayette silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalf

Rozetta silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalf Dubuque silt loam Fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludalf Marshfield ARS 44 o 39 ‘ - 90 o 8 ‘

Withee silt loam (Predominant soil)

Fine-loamy, mixed Aquic Glossoboralf

Marshfield silt loam Fine-loamy, mixed, frigid

Typic Ochraqualf

Spooner ARS 45 o 49 ‘ - 91 o 53 ‘

Chetek sandy loam Coarse-loamy, mixed Eutric Glossaboralf

Pence sandy loam Sandy, mixed, frigid Entic Haplorthod Omega loamy sand Sandy, mixed, frigid Typic Udipsamment Antigo silt loam Well drained silt loam-

sandy loam soils

23

Page 30: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /3 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator Cultivated

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.28 Acre

Planting Date: 5/3/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Dual II Mag 24 oz/AHornet 4.0 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/9/15 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 35606

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1). Dekalb DKC30-19RIB (80)2). Jung 4D178RIB (82)3). InVision FS36TV4RIB (86)4). NK Brand N18Q-3011A (86)5). Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB (89)6). Pioneer P9188AM (91)7). Great Lakes 4548STXRIB (95)8). Channel 195-58STXRIB (95)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

9). LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB (100)10). Pioneer P0157AMX (101)11). Dekalb DKC54-38RIB (104)12). NuTech/G2 5H-806 (106)13). Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) (108)14). AgriGold A6462STXRIB (110)15). LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB (112)16). Dekalb DKC65-71 (115)

Field: ARS406

Results: Table 1601-01 & 1601-02.

Manure: 10456 gal/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn Hybrid Growth and Development

Experiment: 01GD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6048

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid (RM):

Plot Management

FactorHybrid:

24

Page 31: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-01. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Relative Grain Grain Test AGI Silking Early Black Plant

Hybrid maturity yield moisture wt Total Stalk Root $3.44 date dent 75% 50% 25% layer height per bu per A

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A inches

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 185 17.4 60 2 1 1 587 192 221 228 234 241 251 100 2.90 538

Jung 4D178RIB 82 247 18.0 56 0 0 0 781 191 225 231 238 245 255 107 2.91 718

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 223 18.0 57 0 0 0 705 193 222 230 236 245 254 109 2.96 660

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 239 19.8 57 0 0 0 748 193 222 228 235 242 252 112 2.94 703

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 250 19.7 56 0 0 0 780 192 224 230 237 243 250 110 2.94 734

Pioneer P9188AM 91 246 20.6 56 0 0 0 763 194 228 235 242 247 256 115 2.91 715

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 266 19.8 55 0 0 0 832 197 229 236 242 251 261 117 2.95 786

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 253 20.4 54 2 0 2 786 196 231 237 243 249 257 114 2.90 733

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 286 20.8 52 0 0 0 887 198 233 239 243 251 259 114 2.93 837

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 278 22.2 54 1 0 1 855 199 230 235 242 252 263 116 2.92 813

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 278 21.3 53 1 0 0 859 198 231 239 243 252 261 114 2.94 815

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 279 22.3 55 1 0 1 859 201 234 241 246 254 266 121 2.92 817

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 262 23.7 53 0 0 0 797 201 234 244 250 258 267 117 2.90 758

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 292 25.3 53 1 0 0 880 200 233 240 248 255 267 121 2.91 848

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 285 26.7 53 0 0 0 851 201 233 240 246 256 268 117 2.90 826

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 296 26.8 51 0 0 0 883 201 233 241 248 257 270 118 2.90 858

Mean 260 21.4 55 1 0 0 803 197 229 236 242 250 260 114 2.92 760

Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.9 76.1 44.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) 12 0.9 2 NS NS NS 40 2 2 3 3 3 2 4 0.02 37

Lodged Kernel Milk

-------------------doy------------------

Ethanol

--gallons--

25

Page 32: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-02. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids. Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Relative Day of Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

Hybrid maturity year collars method leaves heightno./plant no./plant no./plant inches

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 10.9 12.3 13.1 61.1

Jung 4D178RIB 82 11.2 12.9 13.5 59.6

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 11.0 12.4 13.1 59.1

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 10.9 12.3 13.2 55.9

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 11.4 12.8 13.5 59.8

Pioneer P9188AM 91 10.8 12.3 13.0 61.0

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 11.0 12.4 13.1 61.1

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 10.1 11.3 12.4 58.5

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 11.1 12.5 13.1 59.7

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 10.2 11.8 12.6 60.5

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 11.1 12.3 13.0 58.8

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 11.0 12.3 12.9 59.5

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 10.0 11.7 12.3 63.1

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 10.8 12.2 12.8 58.0

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 11.1 12.4 13.0 60.7

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 10.4 11.8 12.6 60.0

146 1.7 2.9 3.5 3.3

158 4.5 6.6 7.2 11.1

172 7.7 10.8 12.5 34.7

187 12.6 14.7 16.1 82.4

201 19.1 19.2 19.2 113.6

214 19.1 19.2 19.2 113.7

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 146 1.7 3.0 3.3 2.8

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 158 4.8 6.7 7.5 10.8

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 172 8.0 11.8 13.7 35.3

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 187 13.8 15.2 16.5 84.3

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 201 18.2 18.2 18.2 102.0

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 214 18.8 18.8 19.2 100.3

Jung 4D178RIB 82 146 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.6

Jung 4D178RIB 82 158 5.0 7.7 8.3 11.5

Jung 4D178RIB 82 172 8.3 13.2 14.0 37.2

Jung 4D178RIB 82 187 14.0 15.3 16.7 87.7

Jung 4D178RIB 82 201 18.8 18.8 18.8 111.7

Jung 4D178RIB 82 214 19.2 19.2 19.3 106.7continued

26

Page 33: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-02. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Relative Day of Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

Hybrid maturity year collars method leaves heightno./plant no./plant no./plant inches

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 146 2.0 3.0 3.7 3.1

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 158 4.7 6.7 7.5 10.7

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 172 8.0 11.3 13.2 35.0

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 187 13.5 15.2 16.3 82.8

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 201 19.0 19.0 19.0 110.8

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 214 19.0 19.0 19.0 108.5

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 146 1.8 3.0 3.8 3.9

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 158 5.0 7.0 8.0 12.3

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 172 8.0 11.5 13.2 35.8

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 187 13.3 14.8 16.2 83.5

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 201 18.8 18.8 18.8 110.0

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 214 18.5 18.7 19.2 111.5

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 146 2.0 3.0 3.8 3.3

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 158 5.0 6.8 7.7 11.5

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 172 8.0 11.7 13.7 35.7

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 187 14.0 15.5 16.8 83.0

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 201 19.7 19.7 19.7 111.7

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 214 19.8 19.8 19.3 109.5

Pioneer P9188AM 91 146 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.3

Pioneer P9188AM 91 158 5.0 6.7 7.5 11.5

Pioneer P9188AM 91 172 8.0 11.5 12.8 36.0

Pioneer P9188AM 91 187 12.5 14.8 16.2 83.0

Pioneer P9188AM 91 201 18.8 18.8 18.8 115.7

Pioneer P9188AM 91 214 18.7 18.7 18.7 114.8

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 146 1.7 2.7 3.5 3.3

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 158 4.2 6.2 7.0 10.5

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 172 7.8 10.7 12.8 34.7

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 187 12.8 15.3 16.7 81.2

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 201 19.8 19.8 19.8 114.0

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 214 19.5 19.5 18.8 114.0

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 146 1.3 2.0 3.0 3.1

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 158 4.0 6.0 6.8 11.0

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 172 7.2 9.7 12.0 35.5

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 187 11.8 14.0 15.7 84.2

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 201 18.2 18.2 18.2 116.2

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 214 18.2 18.2 18.8 116.7

continued

27

Page 34: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-02. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Relative Day of Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

Hybrid maturity year collars method leaves heightno./plant no./plant no./plant inches

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 146 2.0 3.0 3.8 3.9

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 158 4.8 7.0 7.5 12.0

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 172 8.0 11.3 12.7 36.2

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 187 12.7 14.8 16.3 82.0

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 201 19.7 19.7 19.7 115.3

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 214 19.2 19.2 18.8 113.7

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 146 1.2 2.5 3.2 3.1

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 158 4.0 5.8 6.7 10.0

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 172 7.0 10.3 11.8 30.7

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 187 12.0 14.7 16.0 77.3

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 201 18.2 18.3 18.3 111.3

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 214 18.8 19.0 19.3 115.7

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 146 1.8 3.0 3.7 3.8

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 158 4.8 7.0 7.0 11.0

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 172 8.0 10.0 12.3 35.0

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 187 12.8 14.7 16.2 81.5

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 201 19.7 19.7 19.7 113.5

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 214 19.7 19.7 19.2 114.2

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 146 2.0 2.7 3.8 3.3

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 158 4.5 6.5 7.0 12.2

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 172 8.2 10.3 11.5 35.8

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 187 12.0 14.7 15.8 85.0

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 201 19.5 19.5 19.5 121.3

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 214 19.8 19.8 19.7 121.2

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 146 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 158 3.8 5.8 6.2 10.5

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 172 7.0 10.0 11.3 33.5

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 187 11.0 13.7 15.2 81.8

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 201 18.3 18.7 18.7 114.8

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 214 18.7 18.8 19.2 116.5

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 146 1.5 3.0 3.0 2.8

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 158 4.3 6.5 6.8 11.0

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 172 7.2 9.7 11.8 33.3

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 187 11.8 14.5 15.8 81.3

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 201 20.0 20.0 20.0 117.5

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 214 19.7 19.7 19.5 120.8

continued

28

Page 35: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-02. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Relative Day of Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

Hybrid maturity year collars method leaves heightno./plant no./plant no./plant inches

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 146 1.7 2.8 3.2 3.1

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 158 4.5 6.0 6.5 11.0

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 172 7.5 10.2 11.8 31.2

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 187 12.0 14.8 16.3 76.8

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 201 20.7 20.7 20.7 114.2

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 214 20.2 20.2 19.7 116.7

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 146 2.0 3.0 3.8 3.0

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 158 4.0 6.5 7.0 10.5

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 172 7.3 9.7 11.5 34.0

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 187 11.5 13.8 15.7 83.0

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 201 18.8 18.8 18.8 117.3

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 214 18.7 18.7 18.8 118.3

Mean 10.8 12.2 13.0 59.8Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Day Of Year (D) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

H x D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.1

Day Of Year (D) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7

H x D 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.8

29

Page 36: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Dodgeville Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 52 K (ppm) 153OM (%) 4.2

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 250 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200lbs/A Date: 5 /5 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 20 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Soil Finisher

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.28 Acre

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 1.75 pt/A Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/11/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 31628

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1). Dekalb DKC30-19RIB (80)2). Jung 4D178RIB (82)3). InVision FS36TV4RIB (86)4). NK Brand N18Q-3011A (86)5). Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB (89)6). Pioneer P9188AM (91)7). Great Lakes 4548STXRIB (95)8). Channel 195-58STXRIB (95)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

9). LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB (100)10). Pioneer P0157AMX (101)11). Dekalb DKC54-38RIB (104)12). NuTech/G2 5H-806 (106)13). Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) (108)14). AgriGold A6462STXRIB (110)15). LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB (112)16). Dekalb DKC65-71 (115)

Field:

Results: Table 1601-03.

Manure: N/A

Location: Montfort, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Iowa

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn Hybrid Growth and Development

Experiment: 01GD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6152

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid (RM):

Plot Management

FactorHybrid:

30

Page 37: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-03. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.

Montfort, WI - 2016.

Relative Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGI

Hybrid maturity density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 30555 117 15.3 57 10 8 2 374

Jung 4D178RIB 82 32197 205 15.8 56 2 1 0 655

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 32323 187 15.5 57 0 0 0 599

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 29545 198 18.4 57 2 2 0 624

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 32828 206 16.6 56 1 1 0 657

Pioneer P9188AM 91 28787 218 18.6 56 2 2 0 685

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 34343 258 18.0 57 1 1 0 816

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 32323 229 19.2 55 0 0 0 718

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 31313 225 20.5 54 0 0 0 700

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 28661 242 20.4 55 0 0 0 754

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 31186 241 20.0 55 0 0 0 752

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 30681 258 20.8 58 1 1 0 800

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 32070 244 23.3 54 0 0 0 744

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 34974 266 24.6 54 0 0 0 805

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 32702 260 25.7 55 0 0 0 782

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 31565 263 24.8 52 0 0 0 795

Mean 31628 226 19.8 55.5 1 1 0 704

Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 2.5 8.8 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) 3063 26 0.8 2 3 3 1 81

31

Page 38: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.3 P (ppm) 37 K (ppm) 114OM (%) 3

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /5 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal/A Date: N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.28 Acre

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Roundup 32 oz/AParallel 1.7 pt/AHornet WDG 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/19/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 31810

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1). Dekalb DKC30-19RIB (80)2). Jung 4D178RIB (82)3). InVision FS36TV4RIB (86)4). NK Brand N18Q-3011A (86)5). Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB (89)6). Pioneer P9188AM (91)7). Great Lakes 4548STXRIB (95)8). Channel 195-58STXRIB (95)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

9). LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB (100)10). Pioneer P0157AMX (101)11). Dekalb DKC54-38RIB (104)12). NuTech/G2 5H-806 (106)13). Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) (108)14). AgriGold A6462STXRIB (110)15). LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB (112)16). Dekalb DKC65-71 (115)

Field:

Results: Table 1601-04.

Manure: N/A

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Wood

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn Hybrid Growth and Development

Experiment: 01GD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6151

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid (RM):

Plot Management

FactorHybrid:

32

Page 39: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-04. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.

Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Relative Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGI

Hybrid maturity density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 32323 166 19.2 59 6 6 0 519

Jung 4D178RIB 82 32828 208 19.1 54 4 4 0 651

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 32070 193 19.6 57 5 5 0 603

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 31565 221 20.2 56 1 1 0 689

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 32323 193 20.3 54 5 5 0 602

Pioneer P9188AM 91 30303 234 21.1 54 1 1 0 724

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 31439 222 21.6 53 1 1 0 687

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 31313 220 21.7 53 2 2 0 679

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 32323 242 24.7 52 2 2 0 733

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 30681 233 25.9 53 1 1 0 701

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 32828 243 25.7 54 0 0 0 729

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 31439 256 24.9 53 0 0 0 773

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 31565 222 27.1 50 1 1 0 663

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 32449 264 29.3 54 0 0 0 775

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 30176 228 33.1 54 0 0 0 653

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 33333 240 32.4 55 1 1 0 690

Mean 31810 224 24.1 54 2 2 0 679

Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 14.0 48.0 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) 1520 17 1.1 2 NS NS NS 54

33

Page 40: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Onaway Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.5 P (ppm) 29 K (ppm) 149OM (%) 2.6

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 325 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200lbs/A Date: 5 /2 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 15 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.28 Acre

Planting Date: 5/2/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Capreno 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.75 lb/ARoundup 32 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/13/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 32867

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1). Dekalb DKC30-19RIB (80)2). Jung 4D178RIB (82)3). InVision FS36TV4RIB (86)4). NK Brand N18Q-3011A (86)5). Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB (89)6). Pioneer P9188AM (91)7). Great Lakes 4548STXRIB (95)8). Channel 195-58STXRIB (95)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

9). LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB (100)10). Pioneer P0157AMX (101)11). Dekalb DKC54-38RIB (104)12). NuTech/G2 5H-806 (106)13). Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) (108)14). AgriGold A6462STXRIB (110)15). LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB (112)16). Dekalb DKC65-71 (115)

Field:

Results: Table 1601-05.

Manure: N/A

Location: Seymour, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Outagamie

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn Hybrid Growth and Development

Experiment: 01GD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6153

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid (RM):

Plot Management

FactorHybrid:

34

Page 41: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-05. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.

Seymour, WI - 2016.

Relative Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGI

Hybrid maturity density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 32575 152 18.2 58 1 1 0 479

Jung 4D178RIB 82 33585 205 17.5 56 0 0 0 648

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 33207 203 17.9 58 0 0 0 641

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 31944 189 18.2 57 0 0 0 595

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 33964 204 17.3 55 0 0 0 647

Pioneer P9188AM 91 32828 215 18.8 57 0 0 0 675

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 33080 232 21.2 55 0 0 0 717

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 32575 224 20.6 55 0 0 0 695

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 34090 231 22.6 54 1 1 0 710

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 30555 233 23.4 55 0 0 0 710

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 33333 247 22.4 55 0 0 0 757

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 32575 244 23.0 54 1 1 0 746

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 32575 221 26.3 55 0 0 0 662

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 33964 258 27.0 56 2 2 0 768

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 32702 252 29.7 54 2 2 0 739

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 32323 236 30.3 54 1 1 0 689

Mean 32867 222 22.1 55 1 1 0 680

Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 44.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 9.5 6.4 48.0 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) NS 19 1.6 2 1 1 NS 58

35

Page 42: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Kewaunee Clay LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 7.1 P (ppm) 206 K (ppm) 104OM (%) 2.8

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /9 /16Post plant Analysis: 28-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Turbo-Till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.28 Acre

Planting Date: 5/9/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Steadfast 1.0 oz/AKeystone 1.5 pt/ACallisto 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.25 lb/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/19/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33499

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1). Dekalb DKC30-19RIB (80)2). Jung 4D178RIB (82)3). InVision FS36TV4RIB (86)4). NK Brand N18Q-3011A (86)5). Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB (89)6). Pioneer P9188AM (91)7). Great Lakes 4548STXRIB (95)8). Channel 195-58STXRIB (95)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

9). LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB (100)10). Pioneer P0157AMX (101)11). Dekalb DKC54-38RIB (104)12). NuTech/G2 5H-806 (106)13). Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) (108)14). AgriGold A6462STXRIB (110)15). LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB (112)16). Dekalb DKC65-71 (115)

Field:

Results: Table 1601-06.

Manure: 10000 gal/A

Location: Valders, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Manitowoc

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn Hybrid Growth and Development

Experiment: 01GD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6154

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid (RM):

Plot Management

FactorHybrid:

36

Page 43: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-06. Determining Corn Hybrid Maturity - Comparison of Hybrids.

Valders, WI - 2016.

Relative Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGI

Hybrid maturity density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

Dekalb DKC30-19RIB 80 32575 171 19.1 60 11 11 0 535

Jung 4D178RIB 82 33333 237 20.7 57 2 2 0 736

InVision FS36TV4RIB 86 33964 215 19.1 57 0 0 0 674

NK Brand N18Q-3011A 86 31944 218 20.6 57 5 5 0 678

Dahlman R44-26VT2PRIB 89 33712 238 20.0 56 0 0 0 743

Pioneer P9188AM 91 33838 243 22.1 56 1 1 0 747

Great Lakes 4548STXRIB 95 34343 244 22.5 57 0 0 0 751

Channel 195-58STXRIB 95 34595 242 21.5 55 0 0 0 747

LG Seeds LG5499STXRIB 100 33838 252 25.3 55 0 0 0 761

Pioneer P0157AMX 101 30934 251 23.4 56 0 0 0 765

Dekalb DKC54-38RIB 104 34217 266 22.8 54 0 0 0 817

NuTech/G2 5H-806 106 32449 288 23.8 56 2 1 1 876

Tracy Seeds T108-26(Vip3110) 108 33838 254 25.2 54 1 0 1 766

AgriGold A6462STXRIB 110 34469 274 26.6 55 2 1 0 818

LG Seeds LG5618STXRIB 112 34090 268 28.3 56 0 0 0 791

Dekalb DKC65-71 115 33838 262 29.0 54 0 0 0 771

Mean 33499 245 23.1 56 2 1 0 748

Probability(%)

Hybrid (H) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 19.9 21.0 5.0 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid (H) 1246 22 1.5 2 NS NS 1 70

37

Page 44: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 6. Individual Trial Information - 2016 Trials.Previous Crop / Av. Final Soil Test

Location Row Width (in) Harvest Stand Tillage pH P K actual N form time Insect

Soil Series Cooperators Planting Date Dates (plants/A) Operations (lbs/A) Control Weed Control

Arlington M. Bertram Oct-10 G: 33207 Disk Chisel 6.2 26 79 10456 gal Manure pre Force 3G Medal II EC 24 oz/A

Plano Silt Loam R: 35795 Field Cultivator 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A Hornet 4.0 oz/A

Sep-6 S: 34564 Cultivated

Chippewa Falls J. Clark Oct-3 G: 32726 Spring Chisel 5.9 58 73 10000 gal Manure pre Force 3G Acuron 3.0 qt/A

Sattre Silt Loam J. Jensen O: 28567 Field Cultivator 217 46-0-0 pre 4.4 lbs/A

Irrigated Sep-13 S: 31055 18 9-23-30 plant

Coleman T. Kuchta Oct-13 G: 34342 Fall Chisel 7.6 54 202 16 21-0-0-24S pre Force 3G Acuron 3.00 qt/A

Oconto Sandy Loam Sep-14 S: 34267 Field Cultivator 3 11-52-0 pre 4.4 lbs/A

88 44-0-0 pre

200 9-23-30 plant

Fond du Lac E. Montsma Oct-11 G: 32499 Fall Chisel 6.6 21 111 180 46-0-0 pre Force 3G Acuron 3.0 qt/A

Virgil Silt Loam O: 30366 Field Cultivator 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A

Sep-14 S: 32767

Galesville K. Congdon Oct-3 G: 31134 Field Cultivator 5.8 65 124 30 gal 32-0-0 pre Force 3G Harness 3.0 oz/A

Downs Silt Loam O: 28086 21 21-0-0-24S pre 4.4 lbs/A Callisto 3.0 oz/A

Sep-8 S: 32256 18 18-46-0 pre

18 9-23-30 plant

Hancock P. Sytsma Oct-7 G: 32128 Spring Disk 6.9 31 65 120 0-0-60 pre Force 3G Prowl 2.0 pt/A

Plainfield Sand O: 27146 28 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A Laudis 3.0 oz/A

Irrigated 32 21-0-0-24S post

53 32-0-0 post

115 46-0-0 post

Janesville N. Baker Oct-5 G: 31699 Spring Chisel 6.0 50 138 200 46-0-0 pre Force 3G Lumax 3.25 qt/A

Plano Silt Loam R: 32481 Field Cultivator 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A Accent Q 0.9 oz/A

Marshfield J. Cavadini Oct-19 G: 32128 Field Cultivator 6.3 45 85 18 9-23-30 plant Force 3G Roundup 32 oz/AWithee Silt Loam O: 22838 30 gal 32-0-0 post 4.4 lbs/A Parallel 1.7 pt/A

Sep-20 S: 32179 Hornet WDG 3.0 oz/AMontfort E. Faull Oct-11 G: 32317 Fall Chisel 5.8 52 153 115 46-0-0 pre Force 3G Acuron 1.75 qt/ADodgeville Silt Loam R: 31628 Soil Finisher 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A

Sep-12 S: 33849 20 gal 32-0-0 postSeymour M. Maass Oct-13 G: 31324 Chisel Plow 6.5 29 149 150 46-0-0 pre Force 3G Capreno 3.0 oz/A

Onaway Silt Loam Field Cultivator 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A Atrazine 0.75 lb/A

15 gal 32-0-0 post Roundup 32 oz/A

Spooner P. Holman Oct-18 G: 35223 Spring Chisel 6.1 32 99 18 9-23-30 pre None Dual II Mag 1.0 pt/A

Irrigated Sep-14 S: 35020 Disk 26 13-13-17-9S plant Hornet 4.0 oz/A

Cress Sandy Loam 115 46-0-0 post

Silt Loam Oct-18 G: 35077 Spring Chisel 6.8 13 120 18 9-23-30 pre None Dual II Mag 1.0 pt/A

Antigo Silt Loam Sep-21 S: 35512 Disk 26 13-13-17-9S plant Hornet 4.0 oz/A

115 46-0-0 post

Dryland Oct-18 G: 31160 Spring Chisel 6.8 56 91 26 13-13-17-9S plant None Dual II Mag 1.0 pt/A

Cress Sandy Loam Disk 150 46-0-0 post Hornet 4.0 oz/A

Valders D. Wagner Oct-19 G: 31991 Chisel Plow 7.1 206 104 9000 gal Manure pre Force 3G Steadfast 1.0 oz/A

Kewaunee Clay Loam O: 29480 Turbo till 18 9-23-30 plant 4.4 lbs/A Keystone 1.5 pt

Sep-15 S: 31081 30 gal 28-0-0 post Callisto 3.0 oz/A

Atrazine 0.25 lb/A

Note: G=Grain, R=Refuge, S=Silage, O=Organic.

Corn / 30

May-4

Soybean / 30

April-26

Alfalfa / 30

Soybean / 30

Soybean / 30

Soybean / 30 May-5

May-3

Soybean / 30

May-9

April-27

May-6

May-5

Soybean / 30

May-2

Corn / 30

Corn / 30

May-5Soybean / 30

April-25

May-3

Soybean / 30

Nitrogen Fertilizer

--(ppm)--

Alfalfa / 30

Corn / 30

May-6

May-6

38

Page 45: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 07. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornArlington, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 257 23.8 51.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 783DKC54-38(Base) 265 23.6 52.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 808DKC54-38(Refuge) 246 22.5 51.3 0.4 0.4 0.0 755

P0157AMX 280 23.1 52.3 0.4 0.0 0.4 856P0157AMX(Base) 268 23.2 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 819P0157AMX(Refuge) 247 23.0 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 757

Mean 261 23.2 52.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 796Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 3.6 4.9 13.8 57.4 46.5 46.5 3.8LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 17 0.6 NS NS NS NS 52*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income

39

Page 46: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 08. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornChippewa, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

5L-198 222 22.9 49.7 0.4 0.4 -- 6805L-198(Base) 221 22.7 49.4 0.4 0.4 -- 6775L-198(Refuge) 258 25.7 53.3 0.0 0.0 -- 775

FS 36TV4RIB 153 20.3 48.1 0.4 0.4 -- 477FS 36TV4RIB (Base) 158 20.4 48.4 0.0 0.0 -- 491FS 36TV4RIB (Refuge) 186 20.1 52.8 0.0 0.0 -- 581

Mean 200 22.0 50.3 0.2 0.2 -- 613Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 0.0 0.5 3.1 70.2 70.2 -- 0.0LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 20 2.1 2.9 NS NS -- 61*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

40

Page 47: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 09. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornFond Du Lac, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 250 22.9 53.9 0.4 0.4 -- 767DKC54-38(Base) 248 23.2 55.0 0.0 0.0 -- 758DKC54-38(Refuge) 247 23.5 54.0 0.0 0.0 -- 752

P0157AMX 240 24.1 54.6 0.0 0.0 -- 728P0157AMX(Base) 231 23.5 53.9 0.8 0.8 -- 706P0157AMX(Refuge) 214 22.4 53.9 0.8 0.8 -- 658

Mean 238 23.3 54.2 0.3 0.3 -- 728Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 3.8 53.5 86.7 67.2 67.2 -- 5.4LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 18 NS NS NS NS -- 58*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

41

Page 48: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 10. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornGalesville, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 252 25.0 53.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 760DKC54-38(Base) 253 24.6 54.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 765DKC54-38(Refuge) 215 23.7 52.9 1.2 0.8 0.4 653

P0157AMX 241 24.5 53.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 731P0157AMX(Base) 248 24.5 54.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 751P0157AMX(Refuge) 209 23.2 51.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 638

Mean 236 24.3 53.4 0.8 0.8 0.1 716Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 0.3 13.0 15.0 59.7 53.2 46.5 0.7LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 18 NS NS NS NS NS 57*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income

42

Page 49: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 11. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornHancock, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 237 24.5 52.7 0.0 -- 0.0 717DKC54-38(Base) 232 24.2 53.4 0.0 -- 0.0 705DKC54-38(Refuge) 228 24.2 53.5 0.0 -- 0.0 692

P0157AMX 248 25.0 54.9 0.4 -- 0.4 749P0157AMX(Base) 251 24.9 54.1 0.0 -- 0.0 759P0157AMX(Refuge) 222 24.3 53.6 0.0 -- 0.0 674

Mean 236 24.5 53.7 0.1 -- 0.1 716Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 20.9 76.9 17.1 46.5 -- 46.5 25.2LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) NS NS NS NS -- NS NS*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

43

Page 50: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 12. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornJanesville, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 222 22.8 51.8 0.0 0.0 -- 682DKC54-38(Base) 234 22.8 53.0 0.8 0.8 -- 717DKC54-38(Refuge) 215 22.2 53.2 1.2 1.2 -- 660

P0157AMX 242 22.4 54.9 0.0 0.0 -- 743P0157AMX(Base) 245 21.4 54.7 0.0 0.0 -- 758P0157AMX(Refuge) 221 21.8 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 681

Mean 230 22.2 53.4 0.3 0.3 -- 707Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 8.6 27.0 12.8 8.9 8.9 -- 9.1LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 19 NS NS 0.8 0.8 -- 61*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

44

Page 51: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 13. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornMarshfield, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

5L-198 223 24.9 49.3 3.1 3.1 -- 6755L-198(Base) 222 24.8 49.0 0.0 0.0 -- 6705L-198(Refuge) 251 27.2 51.4 0.4 0.4 -- 747

FS 36TV4RIB 197 20.3 52.6 0.4 0.4 -- 615FS 36TV4RIB (Base) 201 20.0 53.9 0.4 0.4 -- 627FS 36TV4RIB (Refuge) 156 19.8 54.0 0.8 0.8 -- 488

Mean 208 22.8 51.7 0.8 0.8 -- 637Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.3 60.3 -- 0.0LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 15 1.9 0.9 NS NS -- 47*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

45

Page 52: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 14. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornMontfort, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

DKC54-38RIB 240 20.0 54.5 -- -- -- 750DKC54-38(Base) 254 20.0 54.1 -- -- -- 794DKC54-38(Refuge) 225 19.8 54.1 -- -- -- 703

P0157AMX 255 20.0 54.8 -- -- -- 797P0157AMX(Base) 248 20.0 55.2 -- -- -- 774P0157AMX(Refuge) 243 20.4 54.0 -- -- -- 757

Mean 244 20.0 54.5 -- -- -- 763Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 4.4 84.7 65.5 -- -- -- 5.2LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 15 NS NS -- -- -- 49*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

46

Page 53: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 15. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornSeymour, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

5L-198 219 20.2 54.3 0.8 0.8 -- 6845L-198(Base) 214 21.6 53.2 1.2 1.2 -- 6615L-198(Refuge) 213 20.2 53.7 0.4 0.4 -- 663

FS 36TV4RIB 178 17.2 57.5 1.2 1.2 -- 567FS 36TV4RIB (Base) 191 17.1 58.4 0.4 0.4 -- 608FS 36TV4RIB (Refuge) 163 18.6 58.7 2.8 2.8 -- 514

Mean 197 19.2 56.0 1.1 1.1 -- 616Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 0.1 0.0 0.0 39.9 39.9 -- 0.2LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 19 1.1 1.5 -- -- -- 58*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

47

Page 54: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 16. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornValders, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A

5L-198 226 22.5 51.3 0.0 0.0 -- 6945L-198(Base) 222 22.9 50.5 0.0 0.0 -- 6805L-198(Refuge) 265 23.5 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 808

FS 36TV4RIB 197 18.9 56.1 1.6 1.6 -- 619FS 36TV4RIB (Base) 199 18.5 56.4 0.4 0.4 -- 628FS 36TV4RIB (Refuge) 173 18.8 56.6 1.2 1.2 -- 543

Mean 214 20.9 53.8 0.5 0.5 662Probability(%)Hybrid(H) 0.2 0.0 0.0 12.3 12.3 -- 0.4LSD(0.10)Hybrid(H) 27 0.7 1.3 NS NS -- 83*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income-- No Lodging.

48

Page 55: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant : N/A N/A

Date:

N/A

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel,

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 5' x 85' Experiment Size: 1.9 A

Planting Date: 5/16/ 2016 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

Medal II EC 24 oz/A 5/23/16Hornet 4 oz/A 5/28/16

Force 4.4 lb/A

Harvest Date: 10/24/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 85' Harvest Plant Density: 34611

Design: RCB Replications: 6

Factors/Treatments:

1)Dekalb DKC50-822) Pioneer 04483) P0448/DKC50-82

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/31/16

Field: ARS 406

Results:Tables:

1601-17

Manure: 10500 gal / A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel:

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title:

Experiment: Year: 2016

Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - Corn 01MixTHD Trial

ID: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn,

6156

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid:

Plot Management

See factorsHybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

Dairy 01/06/16

49

Page 56: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601- 17. Performance of Hybrid Seed Mixtures - CornArlington, WI - 2016.

Test Harvest *AGIHybrid Yield Moisture weight density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu plants/A $/A

DKC50-82 243 18.8 55.9 34333 765

P0448 245 19.4 56.4 35167 768

P0448/DKC50-82 245 19.3 56.7 34333 769

Mean 245 19.2 56.3 34611 767

Probability(%)

Hybrid(H) 94.0 32.3 43.1 48.6 97.3

LSD(0.10)

Hybrid(H) NS NS NS NS NS

*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income

50

Page 57: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Sandy LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 5.9 P (ppm) 58 K (ppm) 73OM (%) 2

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 217 Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /4 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Spring Chisel Field Cultivator

Irrigation: Irrigated

Plot Size Seeded: 5' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.25 A

Planting Date: 5/4/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 3.0 qt/A Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/13/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chop

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 32568

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

AgR0115001BJWAgR0116018-3110AgR0116019-3110AgR0115140PGJZAgR0115141PGJZAgR0115142PGJZAgR0114036PGJZAgR23170AgR0216021GTCBLLAgR0216022PGJZ

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

AgR0315143PGJZAgR0115034PGJZAgR0215015PGJZ-1AgR0215015PGJZ-2AgR0215015PGJZ-3AgR0214041AgR0315048BJWAgR23012AgR0115129

Field:

Results: Table 1601-18.

Manure: 10000 gal

Location: Chippewa Falls, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, and T. Diallo

County: Chippewa

Supported By: AgReliant Genetics, LLC

Title: UW Corn Trials - Private Silage

Experiment: 01STPrivate Year: 2016Trial ID: 6074

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrids:

Plot Management

See FactorHybrid:

51

Page 58: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-18. AgReliant Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Study.

Chippewa Falls, WI - 2016.

Dry Matter Milk PerHybrid Yield Moisture CP ADF NDF IVD NDFD Starch Ton Acre

pany T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/AAgR0114036PGJZ 7.7 44.6 7.6 20.7 38.2 83.0 55.4 32.8 3353 25952AgR0115001BJW 9.2 51.5 7.7 19.1 36.7 83.0 53.7 31.3 3155 29492AgR0115034PGJZ 9.0 60.1 7.4 21.2 39.5 81.7 53.8 26.5 2863 25708AgR0115129 9.4 55.1 6.9 19.8 37.3 82.9 54.3 26.1 2718 25673AgR0115140PGJZ 8.9 52.8 6.5 23.3 41.3 81.7 55.7 28.7 3101 27757AgR0115141PGJZ 8.6 51.6 7.0 19.9 37.9 83.7 57.1 25.9 2798 24177AgR0115142PGJZ 8.3 57.3 7.3 20.6 39.5 82.4 55.4 24.5 2742 22890AgR0116018-3110 5.8 52.2 7.9 20.1 37.7 82.8 54.3 29.7 3093 18048AgR0116019-3110 7.1 39.6 7.2 18.8 35.4 83.6 53.9 35.3 3375 23940AgR0214041 10.6 54.8 7.5 20.3 38.0 82.7 54.5 28.6 2990 31801AgR0215015PGJZ-1 8.7 52.2 6.9 20.5 38.2 82.6 54.5 29.2 3005 26070AgR0215015PGJZ-2 8.4 54.4 7.1 21.2 39.3 81.6 53.2 26.9 2857 24180AgR0215015PGJZ-3 9.4 50.6 7.1 18.9 36.6 83.5 55.0 32.1 3166 29648AgR0216021GTCBLL 8.1 36.7 6.5 20.0 37.1 84.4 58.0 35.3 3417 27517AgR0216022PGJZ 9.0 54.5 7.2 21.1 38.2 82.7 54.7 31.5 3217 29088AgR0315048BJW 9.0 62.9 7.7 22.0 41.1 80.4 52.4 21.7 2549 22929AgR0315143PGJZ 8.5 60.3 7.1 22.8 42.6 79.9 52.8 20.0 2441 20781AgR23012 9.2 56.9 7.9 21.2 38.9 82.2 54.3 27.4 2959 27318AgR23170 9.9 58.8 6.8 21.8 39.8 82.3 55.7 28.9 3075 30674

Mean 8.7 53.0 7.2 20.7 38.6 82.5 54.7 28.6 2993 25981Probability (%)Hybrid (H) 0.0 0.0 1.1 29.9 22.7 34.6 5.7 0.1 0.0 1.0

LSD (0.10)Hybrid (H) 1.2 3.9 0.6 NS NS NS 2.4 5.4 313 5299

52

Page 59: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Loyal Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.3 P (ppm) 45 K (ppm) 85OM (%) 3

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /5 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal Date: N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 5' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.25 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Parallel 1.7 pt/AHornet WDG 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/20/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chop

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 30166

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

AgR0115001BJWAgR0116018-3110AgR0116019-3110AgR0115140PGJZAgR0115141PGJZAgR0115142PGJZAgR0114036PGJZAgR23170AgR0216021GTCBLLAgR0216022PGJZ

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

AgR0315143PGJZAgR0115034PGJZAgR0215015PGJZ-1AgR0215015PGJZ-2AgR0215015PGJZ-3AgR0214041AgR0315048BJWAgR23012AgR0115129

Field:

Results: Table 1602-19.

Manure: None

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, and T. Diallo

County: Wood

Supported By: AgReliant Genetics, LLC

Title: UW Corn Trials - Private Silage

Experiment: 01STPrivate Year: 2016Trial ID: 6104

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrids:

Plot Management

See FactorHybrid:

53

Page 60: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-19. AgReliant Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Study.

Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Dry Matter Milk PerHybrid Yield Moisture CP ADF NDF IVD NDFD Starch Ton Acre

pany T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/AAgR0114036PGJZ 7.8 46.3 6.3 23.6 41.4 81.2 54.7 30.5 3204 25311AgR0115001BJW 8.4 54.5 6.6 19.4 37.1 82.3 52.3 32.7 3174 26803AgR0115034PGJZ 8.8 59.1 6.6 17.9 34.1 85.0 56.1 36.7 3433 30300AgR0115129 9.7 54.3 6.5 16.8 33.3 85.2 55.7 36.0 3315 32235AgR0115140PGJZ 8.9 46.3 6.2 18.3 34.9 85.2 57.5 38.2 3541 31592AgR0115141PGJZ 9.3 50.5 6.2 18.2 34.6 84.0 53.8 36.4 3352 31068AgR0115142PGJZ 8.3 56.6 6.5 19.6 36.8 83.4 54.8 31.7 3116 25821AgR0116018-3110 6.8 47.8 6.8 17.7 34.9 85.0 57.2 36.3 3464 23682AgR0214041 9.1 57.8 6.1 18.7 35.7 83.5 53.9 34.0 3198 29208AgR0215015PGJZ-1 8.8 48.1 6.4 18.7 35.8 83.7 54.6 36.1 3406 30048AgR0215015PGJZ-2 8.3 46.2 6.6 17.7 34.0 85.1 56.0 38.0 3521 29178AgR0215015PGJZ-3 8.3 46.2 6.6 17.9 34.9 84.4 55.3 36.5 3405 28189AgR0216021GTCBLL 8.8 51.1 5.9 16.4 32.3 86.8 59.0 39.3 3545 31147AgR0216022PGJZ 7.8 54.5 6.6 18.2 34.7 84.6 55.7 36.3 3417 26862AgR0315048BJW 9.7 58.0 6.5 17.2 33.4 85.7 57.2 36.2 3370 32895AgR0315143PGJZ 8.9 60.2 6.6 19.4 36.6 83.6 55.2 29.6 2958 26268AgR23012 9.3 54.9 6.2 19.7 36.1 83.7 54.9 34.0 3250 30185AgR23170 7.5 56.5 6.0 19.4 35.6 84.6 56.7 36.0 3405 25297

Mean 8.6 52.7 6.4 18.6 35.4 84.3 55.6 35.2 3337 28672Probability (%)Hybrid (H) 1.1 0.0 15.1 17.0 26.7 19.1 12.1 5.2 0.7 5.6

LSD (0.10)Hybrid (H) 1.1 3.5 NS NS NS NS NS 4.5 234 4547

54

Page 61: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Kewaunee Clay LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 7.1 P (ppm) 206 K (ppm) 104OM (%) 2.8

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /9 /16Post plant Analysis: 28-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal Date: N/A

Fall Chisel Turbo till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 5' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.25 A

Planting Date: 5/9/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Steadfast 1.0 oz/AKeystone 1.5 pt/ACallisto 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.25 lb/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/15/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chop

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 32325

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

AgR0115001BJWAgR0116018-3110AgR0116019-3110AgR0115140PGJZAgR0115141PGJZAgR0115142PGJZAgR0114036PGJZAgR23170AgR0216021GTCBLLAgR0216022PGJZ

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

AgR0315143PGJZAgR0115034PGJZAgR0215015PGJZ-1AgR0215015PGJZ-2AgR0215015PGJZ-3AgR0214041AgR0315048BJWAgR23012AgR0115129

Field:

Results: Table 1601-20.

Manure: 9000 gal

Location: Valders, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, and T. Diallo

County: Manitowoc

Supported By: AgReliant Genetics, LLC

Title: UW Corn Trials - Private Silage

Experiment: 01STPrivate Year: 2016Trial ID: 6118

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrids:

Plot Management

See FactorHybrid:

55

Page 62: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1601-20. AgReliant Hybrid Corn Silage Evaluation Study.

Valders, WI - 2016.

Dry Matter Milk PerHybrid Yield Moisture CP ADF NDF IVD NDFD Starch Ton Acre

pany T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/AAgR0114036PGJZ 6.6 46.6 5.6 19.3 36.6 84.4 57.3 36.1 3454 22859AgR0115001BJW 7.1 48.4 5.3 22.2 40.9 80.9 53.4 30.2 3068 21699AgR0115034PGJZ 10.0 57.8 5.6 16.3 33.3 86.8 60.5 37.5 3484 34951AgR0115129 9.6 55.8 5.5 17.0 34.1 85.7 57.9 34.4 3204 30679AgR0115140PGJZ 8.0 49.3 5.6 20.5 38.3 83.8 57.8 34.5 3352 27140AgR0115141PGJZ 6.3 50.0 5.3 20.6 38.6 83.0 56.0 31.8 3155 19972AgR0115142PGJZ 6.8 55.6 5.2 18.2 35.6 84.5 56.5 35.0 3283 22179AgR0214041 8.5 57.7 4.7 20.4 38.1 83.1 55.7 31.6 3067 25882AgR0215015PGJZ-1 6.8 51.4 5.6 16.5 33.5 86.2 58.7 36.9 3417 23123AgR0215015PGJZ-2 6.9 52.1 5.5 19.9 38.3 83.1 55.8 32.4 3203 22212AgR0215015PGJZ-3 6.3 53.1 5.5 19.8 38.0 82.8 54.9 32.6 3182 20038AgR0216021GTCBLL 7.1 55.7 5.3 18.4 35.8 85.6 59.8 34.4 3318 23467AgR0216022PGJZ 7.8 52.5 5.7 17.2 33.9 86.1 59.0 37.6 3498 27538AgR0315048BJW 8.3 60.9 5.0 19.1 36.5 84.6 57.6 33.6 3213 26640AgR0315143PGJZ 9.0 57.0 5.3 17.8 34.8 85.6 58.7 32.9 3123 28147AgR23012 7.4 54.2 5.3 17.8 34.7 85.8 58.9 36.9 3437 25735AgR23170 8.0 56.7 4.8 20.1 38.1 84.3 58.7 33.4 3284 26255

Mean 7.7 53.8 5.3 18.9 36.4 84.5 57.5 34.2 3279 25207Probability (%)Hybrid (H) 1.0 0.0 6.3 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.2 24.1 5.0 3.9

LSD (0.10)Hybrid (H) 1.7 4.6 0.5 2.5 3.3 2.0 2.5 NS 243 6574

56

Page 63: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: AlfalfapH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant : N/A N/ADate:

N/A

Starter : 10-34-0 200 lbs/A 5 /3 /16

Post plant : N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator Cultivated

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 25' Experiment Size: 1.4 A

Planting Date: 5/3/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Hornet 4.0 oz/AMedal II 24 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: S: 9/6/16G: 10/10/16

Harvest Method: S: New Holland 707G: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: S: 2.5' x 23'G: 5' x 23'

Harvest Plant Density: 33989

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) 200002) 26000 3) 32000 4) 38000 5) 440006) 50000

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

1) Mon 942) Mon 973) Mon 984) Mon 995) Mon 1056) Mon 1087) Mon 2088) Mon 308

Field: ARS406

Results: Tables 1602-01, 1602-02 & 1602-03.

Manure: 10456 gal/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: UW: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo, Randy ShaverMonsanto: Leo Brown, John Kennicker, Mike Weiss, Todd VagtsDairyland Labs: Dave Taysom

County: ColumbiaSupported By: Monsanto

Title: Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain and Silage Performance

Experiment: 02PD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6051

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Target Plant Density: Hybrid:

Plot Management

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

Dairy N/A

See Factors

1) High-cut: 24-inches2) Low-cut: 6-inches

Cutting height

57

Page 64: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-01. Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Target Test Lodged AGR

Hybrid density V5 Harvest Ears Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A plants/A plants/A ears/A bu/A % lbs/bu % % % $/A

Mon 94 26000 27020 27525 30050 251 20.1 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 784

Mon 94 32000 32954 31818 33585 265 20.1 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 827

Mon 94 38000 39141 38636 39141 269 20.0 52 1.3 1.3 0.0 838

Mon 94 44000 44318 45454 46717 275 20.1 53 0.0 0.0 0.0 857

Mon 97 26000 24558 26515 27272 241 21.8 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 743

Mon 97 32000 30618 30303 31818 255 21.4 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 789

Mon 97 38000 37184 35606 36616 270 20.3 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 841

Mon 97 44000 43371 40656 40909 263 21.6 52 1.9 1.9 0.0 813

Mon 98 26000 22790 24495 26262 211 24.4 53 4.2 3.1 1.1 638

Mon 98 32000 28030 29293 30050 224 24.8 52 8.4 5.9 2.5 677

Mon 98 38000 33143 32070 32828 229 24.9 52 8.5 4.6 3.9 692

Mon 98 44000 40088 40151 40403 229 24.2 52 30.1 10.7 19.4 697

Mon 99 20000 19760 21464 23232 211 20.2 51 1.2 1.2 0.0 659

Mon 99 26000 25631 24495 26262 247 20.4 53 0.0 0.0 0.0 769

Mon 99 32000 31250 31818 33333 258 20.3 51 0.0 0.0 0.0 803

Mon 99 38000 38699 37878 39141 273 20.1 52 0.7 0.7 0.0 850

Mon 99 44000 43307 43686 44444 278 20.3 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 867

Mon 99 50000 48926 48989 48989 280 20.1 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 874

Mon 105 26000 23043 25252 27020 238 21.8 54 0.0 0.0 0.0 734

Mon 105 32000 28977 27272 28535 247 22.4 52 1.9 0.0 1.9 760

Mon 105 38000 33585 33585 35606 264 22.8 53 0.0 0.0 0.0 808

Mon 105 44000 39962 36868 38888 266 22.7 53 0.7 0.7 0.0 815

Mon 108 20000 19381 19444 22474 239 26.0 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 717

Mon 108 26000 25631 26515 28787 255 25.2 52 0.0 0.0 0.0 771

Mon 108 32000 31881 29798 31818 291 24.2 52 1.6 0.0 1.6 884

Mon 108 38000 38383 38636 40403 290 24.4 53 5.7 0.6 5.1 879

Mon 108 44000 43371 42424 41414 300 24.3 52 12.4 1.8 10.6 911

Mon 108 50000 49936 48989 49494 297 23.8 52 14.6 4.7 9.9 905

Mon 208 26000 25252 25505 28030 242 25.8 52 2.9 2.9 0.0 726

Mon 208 32000 31818 32070 33838 250 26.0 52 7.8 5.5 2.3 749

Mon 208 38000 37626 34343 35606 247 25.4 52 7.3 7.3 0.0 743

Mon 208 44000 44065 42424 42929 253 26.1 52 10.8 6.6 4.2 759

Mon 308 26000 24305 23737 27777 240 26.7 52 2.1 2.1 0.0 717

Mon 308 32000 30050 30303 34848 277 25.3 52 2.3 2.3 0.0 835

Mon 308 38000 36805 35858 38131 299 25.2 53 2.0 1.4 0.7 903

Mon 308 44000 42613 37878 40909 298 25.2 52 0.7 0.0 0.7 898

Mean 33819 33382 34932 259 23.0 52 3.6 1.8 1.8 793

Probability(%)

Plant Density x Hybrid 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Plant Density x Hybrid 1290 2427 2604 13 0.9 2 6.8 3.4 6.5 40

Density

58

Page 65: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-02. Cutting Height, Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

Arlington WI - 2016. (page 1 of 3)

Cutting Dry Matter Moist Crude in vitro

Hybrid height V5 Harvest Ears Yield protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A inches plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 94 26000 26894 27777 31313 9.3 66.1 7.8 21.9 35.2 85.5 58.8 40.6 3579 33291

Mon 94 32000 32575 32702 35606 10.1 66.1 7.4 23.3 36.9 84.8 58.8 40.1 3528 35560

Mon 94 38000 39015 38762 40151 11.0 65.6 7.3 23.1 36.2 85.1 59.0 40.7 3553 38908

Mon 94 44000 45201 44570 45959 10.8 65.1 7.3 23.4 37.0 85.4 60.6 40.3 3564 38517

Mon 97 26000 24368 25883 27904 9.9 65.9 7.8 23.3 36.8 84.7 58.6 39.7 3524 34970

Mon 97 32000 30934 31565 33712 10.0 65.6 7.4 23.2 36.9 85.1 59.9 40.5 3546 35576

Mon 97 38000 36742 36363 38510 10.4 66.2 7.7 21.6 34.5 85.8 58.7 42.9 3601 37555

Mon 97 44000 42802 42297 42929 10.6 66.5 7.5 24.2 37.8 84.7 59.6 38.8 3515 37464

Mon 98 26000 22853 25757 28787 9.6 68.7 8.1 23.2 36.4 85.3 59.6 38.2 3557 34174

Mon 98 32000 28156 30555 31691 9.3 69.2 7.8 22.1 35.2 85.5 59.0 40.8 3583 33358

Mon 98 38000 33459 31691 34217 10.0 68.8 7.5 24.3 38.7 84.7 60.3 36.6 3503 35098

Mon 98 44000 38762 40151 40782 10.4 66.4 7.8 25.2 39.6 83.5 58.3 34.8 3429 35753

Mon 99 20000 19949 22222 23990 8.8 64.4 8.1 21.7 35.0 85.2 57.8 39.8 3563 31258

Mon 99 26000 26262 25883 29166 9.2 64.8 7.8 23.3 37.4 84.1 57.5 38.0 3480 32159

Mon 99 32000 31313 32070 34469 10.4 63.5 7.3 22.4 35.4 85.3 58.6 42.2 3572 37027

Mon 99 38000 37878 37373 38762 10.9 62.8 7.4 22.5 36.0 85.6 60.1 41.3 3584 39086

Mon 99 44000 43560 43686 45959 11.7 61.9 7.5 21.4 34.2 85.9 58.8 43.4 3614 42306

Mon 99 50000 47979 47600 47979 11.4 63.2 7.2 21.0 33.0 86.8 59.9 45.2 3666 41826

Mon 105 26000 24747 26136 27146 9.3 68.0 8.2 23.6 37.8 84.3 58.4 35.6 3468 32433

Mon 105 32000 28030 29040 31944 10.6 64.9 7.7 22.4 36.0 85.5 59.8 39.9 3575 37930

Mon 105 38000 33712 33964 37626 10.7 65.4 7.7 20.3 32.7 86.2 57.9 44.6 3633 38976

Mon 105 44000 39393 38131 39898 10.6 67.0 7.5 23.4 37.3 84.7 59.0 40.2 3518 37305

Mon 108 20000 19192 19949 22348 9.7 67.7 8.0 20.8 33.4 85.5 56.7 41.8 3593 35008

Mon 108 26000 25126 26515 29924 10.2 67.4 7.7 20.6 32.8 85.9 56.8 43.0 3609 36884

Mon 108 32000 31691 32828 36111 10.8 65.4 7.0 23.2 37.6 85.0 60.1 39.8 3538 38080

Mon 108 38000 37499 39141 41287 11.4 65.1 7.2 22.2 36.0 85.5 59.7 41.4 3578 40915

Mon 108 44000 43181 42676 42802 11.1 64.9 6.6 23.2 36.7 84.1 56.6 41.1 3494 38738

Mon 108 50000 51009 49621 48863 12.3 64.7 6.8 21.1 33.4 85.7 57.0 44.8 3608 44082

Mon 208 26000 25126 26767 30176 10.3 67.9 8.6 24.7 39.8 83.3 57.8 35.3 3411 34929

Mon 208 32000 31818 32702 34217 10.4 68.6 8.2 24.1 38.0 84.0 57.8 38.1 3470 36161

Mon 208 38000 37373 36363 38383 10.1 70.0 8.6 25.9 40.3 82.8 57.3 34.4 3380 34010

Mon 208 44000 43939 43307 44318 10.6 68.7 8.3 24.9 39.0 83.5 57.6 35.8 3431 36344

Mon 308 26000 23863 26262 32575 9.5 67.0 7.9 22.0 36.2 84.5 57.1 38.5 3512 33209

Mon 308 32000 29798 30681 36868 10.1 66.7 7.5 22.3 36.1 84.9 58.2 39.6 3539 35555

Mon 308 38000 36237 35984 38131 10.9 67.5 7.9 22.4 36.5 85.4 60.1 39.8 3563 38788

Mon 308 44000 41919 39646 42045 10.2 68.5 7.4 21.7 34.8 85.7 59.0 42.1 3598 36555

6 33592 33382 34932 10.8 68.2 7.6 24.4 38.4 83.8 57.8 37.8 3455 37320

24 33761 34764 37654 9.9 64.4 7.7 21.1 34.2 86.2 59.5 42.1 3627 36002

continued

Target density

Whole Plant

Density Milk per

59

Page 66: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-02. Cutting Height, Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

(continued) Arlington WI - 2016. (page 2 of 3)

Cutting Dry Matter Moist Crude in vitro

Hybrid height V5 Harvest Ears Yield protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A inches plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 94 26000 6 26010 27525 30050 9.5 69.3 7.6 23.5 37.0 84.5 57.9 38.1 3505 33441

Mon 94 26000 24 27777 28030 32575 9.1 62.9 8.0 20.2 33.5 86.5 59.8 43.1 3652 33140

Mon 94 32000 6 32575 31818 33585 10.8 67.2 7.3 23.5 36.7 85.0 59.0 40.9 3541 38202

Mon 94 32000 24 32575 33585 37626 9.4 65.1 7.5 23.1 37.1 84.6 58.6 39.3 3515 32918

Mon 94 38000 6 38636 38636 39141 11.2 67.7 7.3 24.5 37.6 84.5 58.7 39.4 3504 39407

Mon 94 38000 24 39393 38888 41161 10.7 63.5 7.4 21.8 34.8 85.8 59.2 42.0 3603 38408

Mon 94 44000 6 45959 45454 46717 11.1 67.6 7.2 26.4 41.3 83.6 60.4 36.0 3424 38123

Mon 94 44000 24 44444 43686 45201 10.5 62.7 7.5 20.4 32.6 87.2 60.9 44.5 3704 38912

Mon 97 26000 6 25000 26515 27272 10.7 67.8 7.7 24.6 38.3 83.9 57.9 38.5 3461 36851

Mon 97 26000 24 23737 25252 28535 9.2 64.0 7.9 21.9 35.4 85.6 59.3 40.8 3586 33089

Mon 97 32000 6 30808 30303 31818 10.2 67.5 7.4 25.5 40.3 83.2 58.4 36.6 3407 34712

Mon 97 32000 24 31060 32828 35606 9.9 63.7 7.4 20.9 33.6 87.1 61.4 44.4 3685 36441

Mon 97 38000 6 36363 35606 36616 10.5 69.9 7.9 22.7 35.6 85.1 58.0 42.0 3550 37112

Mon 97 38000 24 37121 37121 40403 10.4 62.4 7.6 20.4 33.3 86.5 59.4 43.9 3652 37997

Mon 97 44000 6 42424 40656 40909 10.7 69.4 7.4 26.8 41.2 83.0 58.7 35.7 3391 36459

Mon 97 44000 24 43181 43939 44949 10.6 63.5 7.7 21.7 34.4 86.4 60.4 41.9 3640 38468

Mon 98 26000 6 22979 24495 26262 10.1 71.0 8.2 24.6 37.9 84.3 58.6 36.9 3490 35236

Mon 98 26000 24 22727 27020 31313 9.1 66.5 8.0 21.9 34.9 86.2 60.6 39.6 3624 33113

Mon 98 32000 6 28787 29293 30050 9.9 70.3 7.8 21.8 34.4 85.6 58.1 41.7 3592 35484

Mon 98 32000 24 27525 31818 33333 8.7 68.1 7.8 22.4 36.1 85.5 59.9 39.9 3574 31232

Mon 98 38000 6 33080 32070 32828 10.6 70.0 7.5 25.5 40.3 83.9 60.2 35.1 3449 36637

Mon 98 38000 24 33838 31313 35606 9.4 67.7 7.5 23.1 37.2 85.4 60.5 38.2 3558 33559

Mon 98 44000 6 37373 40151 40403 11.5 67.3 7.8 27.0 41.8 81.9 56.8 32.7 3322 38195

Mon 98 44000 24 40151 40151 41161 9.4 65.6 7.7 23.4 37.3 85.0 59.9 37.0 3536 33311

Mon 99 20000 6 19697 21464 23232 9.2 66.8 7.7 23.9 38.1 83.6 57.0 36.8 3447 31853

Mon 99 20000 24 20202 22979 24747 8.3 61.9 8.4 19.5 31.9 86.8 58.7 42.8 3679 30663

Mon 99 26000 6 26767 24495 26262 9.0 68.1 7.9 26.2 41.9 82.1 57.2 32.7 3330 30095

Mon 99 26000 24 25757 27272 32070 9.4 61.4 7.7 20.3 33.0 86.0 57.7 43.2 3629 34223

Mon 99 32000 6 31818 31818 33333 10.5 65.8 7.2 24.4 37.8 83.7 56.9 40.1 3460 36412

Mon 99 32000 24 30808 32323 35606 10.2 61.2 7.4 20.4 32.9 86.9 60.3 44.4 3684 37642

Mon 99 38000 6 37626 37878 39141 10.8 66.2 7.7 23.9 37.6 84.4 58.3 39.7 3495 37790

Mon 99 38000 24 38131 36868 38383 11.0 59.4 7.2 21.1 34.4 86.9 62.0 42.9 3674 40382

Mon 99 44000 6 43939 43686 44444 12.1 64.4 7.5 22.6 35.8 85.0 57.7 42.4 3544 42999

Mon 99 44000 24 43181 43686 47474 11.3 59.4 7.5 20.2 32.6 86.9 59.8 44.5 3683 41613

Mon 99 50000 6 48484 48989 48989 11.1 66.1 7.1 23.2 36.1 85.1 58.9 42.1 3555 39416

Mon 99 50000 24 47474 46211 46969 11.7 60.2 7.3 18.7 29.8 88.4 60.9 48.4 3778 44237

Mon 105 26000 6 26010 25252 27020 10.0 68.7 7.8 24.9 39.7 83.3 57.9 33.3 3376 33695

Mon 105 26000 24 23485 27020 27272 8.7 67.3 8.6 22.3 35.8 85.3 59.0 37.8 3560 31171

Mon 105 32000 6 26515 27272 28535 11.8 65.3 7.9 24.9 39.8 83.6 58.7 36.1 3434 40631

Mon 105 32000 24 29545 30808 35353 9.5 64.5 7.6 19.9 32.3 87.4 61.0 43.7 3716 35230

continued

Target density

Whole Plant

Density Milk per

60

Page 67: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-02. Cutting Height, Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

(continued) Arlington WI - 2016. (page 3 of 3)

Cutting Dry Matter Moist Crude in vitro

Hybrid height V5 Harvest Ears Yield protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A inches plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 105 38000 6 33333 33585 35606 11.3 67.6 7.6 22.4 35.5 84.1 55.1 41.5 3495 39577

Mon 105 38000 24 34090 34343 39646 10.2 63.3 7.7 18.2 29.8 88.2 60.6 47.6 3771 38375

Mon 105 44000 6 37878 36868 38888 10.8 69.1 7.5 25.7 40.4 83.0 57.8 36.6 3394 36684

Mon 105 44000 24 40909 39393 40909 10.4 64.9 7.4 21.1 34.2 86.4 60.2 43.7 3641 37926

Mon 108 20000 6 18939 19444 22474 9.7 70.4 7.8 22.5 35.7 83.9 54.9 39.5 3482 33695

Mon 108 20000 24 19444 20454 22222 9.8 65.1 8.2 19.2 31.1 87.1 58.5 44.1 3703 36321

Mon 108 26000 6 25252 26515 28787 10.6 69.4 7.6 20.8 32.7 85.3 54.8 43.4 3584 37907

Mon 108 26000 24 25000 26515 31060 9.9 65.3 7.8 20.4 33.0 86.4 58.9 42.5 3634 35861

Mon 108 32000 6 31313 29798 31818 11.4 66.6 7.0 24.6 39.6 84.5 61.0 38.2 3492 39875

Mon 108 32000 24 32070 35858 40403 10.1 64.3 7.0 21.9 35.5 85.6 59.2 41.4 3583 36285

Mon 108 38000 6 37626 38636 40403 12.0 67.7 7.3 23.0 36.8 84.4 57.6 40.6 3508 42181

Mon 108 38000 24 37373 39646 42171 10.9 62.4 7.2 21.5 35.2 86.6 61.8 42.1 3647 39649

Mon 108 44000 6 43181 42424 41414 11.7 65.7 6.6 25.4 39.5 82.7 55.8 38.2 3385 39799

Mon 108 44000 24 43181 42929 44191 10.5 64.1 6.7 21.0 33.8 85.6 57.4 44.0 3602 37676

Mon 108 50000 6 52525 48989 49494 13.3 66.0 6.8 23.2 36.4 84.4 57.2 42.2 3513 46614

Mon 108 50000 24 49494 50252 48232 11.2 63.5 6.8 19.0 30.4 86.9 56.9 47.5 3702 41550

Mon 208 26000 6 24495 25505 28030 10.8 69.7 8.8 27.3 43.7 81.3 57.3 31.0 3270 35444

Mon 208 26000 24 25757 28030 32323 9.7 66.1 8.5 22.1 35.9 85.2 58.4 39.5 3552 34415

Mon 208 32000 6 32070 32070 33838 10.7 69.6 8.1 24.0 37.3 83.9 56.6 39.2 3467 36938

Mon 208 32000 24 31565 33333 34595 10.2 67.5 8.3 24.2 38.7 84.2 59.0 37.0 3472 35384

Mon 208 38000 6 37626 34343 35606 10.4 72.2 9.0 28.8 43.9 80.7 56.1 29.8 3231 33729

Mon 208 38000 24 37121 38383 41161 9.7 67.8 8.3 23.1 36.7 84.9 58.6 39.0 3529 34291

Mon 208 44000 6 43939 42424 42929 10.8 70.4 8.4 27.6 42.9 81.8 57.6 31.8 3304 35804

Mon 208 44000 24 43939 44191 45706 10.4 67.0 8.2 22.2 35.1 85.2 57.6 39.7 3559 36883

Mon 308 26000 6 23232 23737 27777 10.1 68.6 7.9 22.9 37.4 83.8 56.5 36.5 3461 34921

Mon 308 26000 24 24495 28787 37373 8.8 65.4 8.0 21.0 35.0 85.2 57.7 40.6 3562 31498

Mon 308 32000 6 30050 30303 34848 11.2 66.6 7.5 23.8 38.4 83.9 58.2 37.5 3466 38886

Mon 308 32000 24 29545 31060 38888 8.9 66.8 7.6 20.8 33.9 85.9 58.3 41.7 3612 32223

Mon 308 38000 6 35858 35858 38131 11.7 68.5 7.8 23.2 37.5 84.8 59.4 38.7 3519 41268

Mon 308 38000 24 36616 36111 38131 10.1 66.6 8.0 21.6 35.6 86.0 60.8 41.0 3608 36307

Mon 308 44000 6 41161 37878 40909 10.6 70.7 7.5 23.0 36.5 85.0 58.8 40.6 3542 37447

Mon 308 44000 24 42676 41414 43181 9.8 66.3 7.4 20.4 33.1 86.5 59.1 43.5 3655 35663

Mean 33677 34073 36293 10.4 66.3 7.7 22.8 36.3 85.0 58.6 40.0 3541 36661Probability(%)

Density x Hybrid (D x H) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 25.7 3.8 4.0 1.4 5.6 0.0Cutting Height (C) 40.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

(D x H) x C 19.1 2.0 0.9 8.1 3.6 15.1 11.9 12.6 23.4 84.8 11.1 17.8 20.7

LSD (0.10)

Density x Hybrid (D x H) 1782 1915 2223 0.7 1.7 0.4 2.5 NS 1.6 2.1 4.8 122 3001Cutting Height (C) NS 386 520 0.2 0.4 NS 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.7 22 707

(D x H) x C NS 2517 3130 1.0 2.4 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Target density

Whole Plant

Density Milk per

61

Page 68: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-03. Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

Arlington, WI - 2016.

Target Plant Silk Kernel KMR SMR VMRHybrid density height day of year milk 0-5 0-5 0-10

plants/A inches %Mon 94 26000 120 197 43 2.2 1.0 3.2Mon 94 32000 119 198 35 1.8 0.5 2.3Mon 94 38000 122 198 43 2.2 0.7 2.8Mon 94 44000 121 200 38 1.9 0.8 2.7Mon 97 26000 116 196 48 2.4 1.2 3.6Mon 97 32000 118 196 55 2.8 1.1 3.9Mon 97 38000 118 195 43 2.2 0.8 3.0Mon 97 44000 116 195 30 1.5 0.8 2.3Mon 98 26000 125 201 52 2.6 1.8 4.4Mon 98 32000 124 201 57 2.8 1.6 4.4Mon 98 38000 121 202 55 2.8 1.4 4.1Mon 98 44000 123 202 52 2.6 1.3 3.9Mon 99 20000 111 195 48 2.4 1.4 3.9Mon 99 26000 116 196 52 2.6 1.1 3.7Mon 99 32000 117 196 43 2.2 1.0 3.2Mon 99 38000 116 195 45 2.3 1.2 3.4Mon 99 44000 115 196 42 2.1 0.9 3.0Mon 99 50000 119 197 45 2.3 0.8 3.1Mon 105 26000 120 201 58 2.9 1.9 4.8Mon 105 32000 118 200 55 2.8 1.7 4.5Mon 105 38000 116 201 57 2.8 1.5 4.4Mon 105 44000 116 202 53 2.7 1.1 3.8Mon 108 20000 119 200 50 2.5 2.7 5.2Mon 108 26000 120 199 53 2.7 1.5 4.2Mon 108 32000 119 199 52 2.6 1.8 4.4Mon 108 38000 119 199 43 2.2 1.7 3.9Mon 108 44000 118 199 43 2.2 1.4 3.6Mon 108 50000 120 200 40 2.0 1.0 3.0Mon 208 26000 124 201 52 2.6 1.9 4.5Mon 208 32000 128 201 55 2.8 1.7 4.5Mon 208 38000 127 202 53 2.7 1.5 4.2Mon 208 44000 124 201 50 2.5 1.3 3.8Mon 308 26000 120 199 63 3.2 3.1 6.2Mon 308 32000 121 198 63 3.2 1.8 5.0Mon 308 38000 116 199 58 2.9 1.7 4.7Mon 308 44000 115 200 55 2.8 1.8 4.6

Mean 119 199 49 2.5 1.4 3.9Probability(%)Plant Density x Hybrid 0.0 0.3 5.2 5.2 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)Plant Density x Hybrid 4.4 0.8 6.9 0.3 0.5 0.8

62

Page 69: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: SoybeanpH: 6.3 P (ppm) 37 K (ppm) 114OM (%) 3.0

Preplant : N/A N/ADate:

N/A

Starter : 10-34-0 200 lbs/A 5 /5 /16

Post plant : N/A N/A N/A

Field Cultivator Cultivated

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.35 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Roundup 32 oz/AParallel 1.7 pt/AHornet WDG 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/20/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 31186

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) 200002) 26000 3) 32000 4) 38000 5) 440006) 50000

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

1) Mon 942) Mon 973) Mon 984) Mon 99

Field:

Results: Tables 1602-04.

Manure: None

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: UW: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo, Randy ShaverMonsanto: Leo Brown, John Kennicker, Mike Weiss, Todd VagtsDairyland Labs: Dave Taysom

County: WoodSupported By: Monsanto

Title: Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain and Silage Performance

Experiment: 02PD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6066

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Target Plant Density: Hybrid:

Plot Management

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

See Factors

63

Page 70: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-04. Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Target Dry Matter Kernel KMR SMR VMR Crude in vitro

Hybrid density V5 Harvest Ears Yield milk 0-5 0-5 0-10 protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 94 26000 27272 27020 29040 8.2 65 57 2.8 1.6 4.4 6.1 19.6 36.8 84.3 57.4 33.1 3275 27072

Mon 94 32000 33585 34343 34848 10.7 63 58 2.9 1.7 4.6 6.2 19.5 36.3 83.9 55.7 32.6 3181 34154

Mon 94 38000 40909 40656 37626 10.0 63 63 3.2 2.1 5.3 6.0 18.5 35.3 85.2 58.1 34.6 3332 33456

Mon 94 44000 27020 27777 27020 8.8 63 63 3.2 1.4 4.6 5.7 19.0 36.5 84.2 56.9 33.6 3258 28847

Mon 97 26000 32575 32323 32070 8.9 63 54 2.7 1.2 3.8 5.7 20.0 36.8 83.9 56.3 33.8 3271 29184

Mon 97 32000 32070 30050 30303 9.1 63 60 3.0 1.6 4.6 6.2 20.2 37.0 83.3 54.9 33.9 3303 30044

Mon 97 38000 33585 32575 32828 9.6 62 60 3.0 1.1 4.1 5.4 18.7 35.4 84.8 57.1 35.8 3366 32501

Mon 97 44000 36616 35858 35353 9.4 64 53 2.7 1.6 4.3 6.0 21.0 37.8 82.9 55.1 32.1 3177 29829

Mon 98 26000 26010 25757 23737 8.0 68 63 3.2 2.3 5.5 6.1 20.8 39.0 83.1 56.7 28.9 3024 24215

Mon 98 32000 31060 31818 30808 9.5 65 65 3.3 2.5 5.7 6.3 21.1 39.3 83.1 57.0 30.1 3153 29965

Mon 98 38000 32828 30050 29040 8.6 66 72 3.6 2.3 5.9 5.9 20.4 38.4 84.3 59.2 30.1 3127 27016

Mon 98 44000 30555 30050 29798 7.8 69 67 3.3 2.4 5.7 5.8 22.0 40.7 83.0 58.2 27.4 2995 23396

Mon 99 20000 22727 21969 21717 8.2 62 58 2.9 2.0 5.0 6.7 19.1 36.8 84.9 59.0 31.9 3252 26651

Mon 99 26000 28030 27272 26767 8.8 60 55 2.8 2.2 4.9 6.3 17.9 35.7 85.3 58.8 35.0 3414 29891

Mon 99 32000 31060 30808 30808 8.9 64 38 1.9 1.7 3.6 5.9 19.7 37.1 83.9 56.8 33.3 3268 29346

Mon 99 38000 31818 29040 29293 8.1 63 51 2.6 1.7 3.7 6.1 19.6 37.2 83.7 56.3 34.0 3336 26983

Mon 99 44000 40151 41161 35101 10.7 64 53 2.7 1.4 4.1 6.1 20.0 37.4 83.5 55.9 32.5 3222 34453

Mon 99 50000 32575 32828 31818 9.3 63 45 2.3 1.4 3.6 5.8 19.6 37.7 83.6 56.6 32.8 3243 30461

Mean 31691 31186 30443 9.0 64 58 2.9 1.8 4.6 6.0 19.8 37.3 83.9 57.0 32.5 3233 29304

Probability(%)

Plant Density x Hybrid 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Plant Density x Hybrid 6697 6929 6139 1.6 3 14 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.8 2.6 3.3 2.5 3.4 3.8 237 6188

Moist

Milk per Density

Whole Plant

64

Page 71: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Dodgeville Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 52 K (ppm) 153OM (%) 4.2

Preplant : 46-0-0 250 lbs/ADate:

N/A

Starter : 10-34-0 200 lbs/A 5 /5 /16

Post plant : 32-0-0 20 gal/A N/A

Chisel plow Soil Finisher

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.35 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 1.75 pt/A Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/12/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34687

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) 200002) 26000 3) 32000 4) 38000 5) 440006) 50000

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

1) Mon 1052) Mon 1083) Mon 2084) Mon 308

Field:

Results: Tables 1602-05

Manure: None

Location: Montfort, WI

Personnel: UW: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo, Randy ShaverMonsanto: Leo Brown, John Kennicker, Mike Weiss, Todd VagtsDairyland Labs: Dave Taysom

County: GrantSupported By: Monsanto

Title: Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain and Silage Performance

Experiment: 02PD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6065

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Target Plant Density: Hybrid:

Plot Management

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

See Factors

65

Page 72: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-05. Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

Montfort, WI - 2016.

Target Dry Matter Kernel Plant KMR SMR VMR Crude in vitro

Hybrid density V5 Harvest Ears Yield milk height 0-5 0-5 0-10 protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % inches % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 105 26000 22979 26010 29545 9.8 63 57 113 2.8 1.0 3.8 7.3 23.9 38.6 83.8 57.9 36.6 3449 33813

Mon 105 32000 27525 30050 32575 10.7 61 47 112 2.3 0.9 3.2 6.9 22.2 35.4 84.8 56.9 42.2 3535 37894

Mon 105 38000 35858 34090 36111 10.1 62 52 110 2.6 0.7 3.3 6.8 24.0 38.5 83.4 56.9 38.3 3433 34692

Mon 105 44000 37626 37878 39141 10.7 62 55 112 2.8 1.1 3.8 6.6 23.7 37.5 84.2 57.9 40.5 3486 37343

Mon 108 20000 18182 25000 30303 9.7 65 48 110 2.4 2.5 4.9 7.8 19.4 31.4 86.7 57.5 43.8 3674 35702

Mon 108 26000 26515 28535 33585 10.9 64 50 112 2.5 2.4 4.9 7.2 21.7 34.6 85.4 57.9 41.0 3579 39183

Mon 108 32000 30303 32196 36363 11.8 63 48 114 2.4 1.7 4.1 6.8 21.0 34.3 86.0 59.1 43.1 3616 42761

Mon 108 38000 37121 34848 39141 12.0 61 50 112 2.5 0.9 3.4 6.6 21.1 34.2 85.6 57.7 43.7 3595 43263

Mon 108 44000 45454 43686 44949 12.4 61 47 112 2.3 1.2 3.5 6.4 22.8 36.3 85.1 58.9 41.4 3548 44049

Mon 108 50000 49999 48737 50252 12.3 60 37 109 1.8 1.0 2.8 6.3 20.7 32.5 85.9 56.7 45.8 3628 44484

Mon 208 26000 25757 30303 34848 10.6 61 45 118 2.3 0.9 3.2 7.0 23.0 36.8 84.6 58.2 39.7 3516 37361

Mon 208 32000 30808 31818 34595 10.8 62 53 116 2.7 0.9 3.5 7.1 23.8 37.3 84.4 58.2 40.1 3500 37856

Mon 208 38000 36111 37878 39646 11.8 60 47 117 2.3 0.6 3.0 7.2 20.4 32.1 85.8 55.6 45.6 3618 42818

Mon 208 44000 42424 43181 45201 10.6 62 50 116 2.5 1.1 3.6 7.4 25.0 39.8 84.0 59.6 36.8 3451 36668

Mon 308 26000 26262 28282 34090 9.8 64 52 106 2.6 2.0 4.6 7.2 21.7 35.3 85.2 57.9 40.4 3559 34759

Mon 308 32000 31565 32828 35101 10.2 62 57 109 2.8 1.0 3.8 6.9 22.4 36.6 85.0 58.9 39.6 3540 36242

Mon 308 38000 34343 36111 37626 10.6 64 53 110 2.7 1.0 3.7 6.8 22.5 36.4 84.8 58.1 41.4 3530 37379

Mon 308 44000 39898 42929 44696 11.5 62 55 109 2.8 1.4 4.1 6.4 21.5 34.3 86.1 59.4 44.6 3622 41540

Mean 33263 34687 37654 10.9 62 50 112 2.5 1.2 3.7 6.9 22.3 35.6 85.0 58.0 41.4 3549 38767

Probability(%)

Plant Density x Hybrid 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Plant Density x Hybrid 2916 4111 3594 0.9 2 8 3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 3.2 5.1 2.2 2.0 6.0 166 4308

Whole Plant

Density

Moist

Milk per

66

Page 73: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Kewaunee Clay LoamPrevious Crop: CornpH: 7.1 P (ppm) 206 K (ppm) 104OM (%) 2.8

Preplant : N/A N/ADate:

N/A

Starter : 10-34-0 200 lbs/A 5 /9 /16

Post plant : 28-0-0 30 gal/A N/A

Chisel plow Turbo-Till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.35 A

Planting Date: 5/9/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Steadfast 1.0 oz/AKeystone 1.5 pt/ACallisto 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.25 lb/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/15/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33361

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) 200002) 26000 3) 32000 4) 38000 5) 440006) 50000

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /16

1) Mon 942) Mon 973) Mon 984) Mon 995) Mon 105

Field:

Results: Tables 1602-06.

Manure: 10000 gal/A

Location: Valders, WI

Personnel: UW: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo, Randy ShaverMonsanto: Leo Brown, John Kennicker, Mike Weiss, Todd VagtsDairyland Labs: Dave Taysom

County: ManitowocSupported By: Monsanto

Title: Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Grain and Silage Performance

Experiment: 02PD Year: 2016Trial ID: 6150

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Target Plant Density: Hybrid:

Plot Management

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

Dairy N/A

See Factors

67

Page 74: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1602-06. Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Silage Preformance.

Valders, WI - 2016.

Target Dry Matter Kernel Plant KMR SMR VMR Crude in vitro

Hybrid density V5 Harvest Ears Yield milk height 0-5 0-5 0-10 protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

plants/A plants/A plants/A ears/A T/A % % inches % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

Mon 94 26000 24747 26515 31818 9.4 64 55 106 2.8 1.2 4.0 5.8 23.6 37.6 85.3 60.9 39.7 3583 33741

Mon 94 32000 32070 29545 33585 9.6 65 58 108 2.9 0.9 3.9 5.4 26.3 42.2 83.6 61.2 36.2 3456 33307

Mon 94 38000 38636 36111 39141 12.3 62 55 109 2.8 0.9 3.7 6.0 23.7 38.1 85.4 61.6 40.0 3585 44081

Mon 94 44000 44696 44191 46464 10.7 63 50 108 2.5 0.8 3.3 5.6 22.5 35.8 87.0 63.7 42.6 3697 39470

Mon 97 26000 23737 24747 29293 8.7 64 50 103 2.5 0.8 3.3 6.2 22.5 35.8 86.4 61.9 41.9 3656 31985

Mon 97 32000 30555 29798 32323 11.3 63 57 105 2.8 1.4 4.2 6.3 21.5 34.2 86.4 60.2 43.7 3669 41505

Mon 97 38000 34595 37121 40151 9.2 63 52 103 2.6 0.6 3.2 5.5 23.3 36.7 86.0 62.0 43.2 3630 33347

Mon 97 44000 41919 40656 43181 10.3 63 43 103 2.2 0.4 2.6 5.7 25.0 40.2 84.8 62.0 39.2 3533 36362

Mon 98 26000 25505 25505 31565 9.3 68 73 120 3.7 1.8 5.5 6.3 24.6 39.9 85.0 62.3 34.8 3548 32948

Mon 98 32000 30555 32070 34343 8.8 68 68 119 3.4 2.2 5.6 6.0 24.2 38.8 85.4 62.1 36.3 3577 31382

Mon 98 38000 35606 34595 36363 10.4 66 60 113 3.0 1.8 4.8 6.4 25.2 41.4 84.6 62.7 34.0 3514 36553

Mon 98 44000 42171 37878 38888 8.6 70 68 111 3.4 1.7 5.1 5.7 28.3 45.6 83.0 62.9 28.7 3384 29043

Mon 99 20000 18939 20454 29293 8.3 66 53 99 2.7 1.0 3.7 6.1 24.8 40.2 84.2 60.6 35.5 3492 29100

Mon 99 26000 25252 26010 30555 9.8 63 50 100 2.5 1.5 4.0 6.5 22.1 35.9 86.2 61.6 41.0 3644 35685

Mon 99 32000 30808 31565 33838 9.7 63 50 100 2.5 1.4 3.9 5.6 24.3 39.3 85.4 62.7 39.8 3579 34636

Mon 99 38000 39393 37373 40151 9.3 63 38 100 1.9 0.9 2.9 5.4 22.0 34.7 86.8 61.9 44.4 3695 34158

Mon 99 44000 43686 40403 42424 9.5 64 57 101 2.8 1.3 4.1 5.6 24.0 38.1 85.1 60.8 40.8 3569 34003

Mon 99 50000 48989 45959 46969 9.8 63 60 101 3.0 1.1 4.1 5.2 25.9 41.5 85.3 64.7 38.4 3557 34881

Means 33992 33361 36686 9.7 65 55 106 2.8 1.2 4.0 5.8 24.1 38.7 85.3 62.0 38.9 3576 34788

Probability(%)

Plant Density x Hybrid 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Plant Density x Hybrid 1880 2260 2420 1.4 3 10 6 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.8 4.6 7.5 2.8 3.2 7.8 210 6250

Density

Whole Plant

Moist

Milk per

68

Page 75: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: SoybeanpH: 6.9 P (ppm) 51 K (ppm) 124OM (%) 2.9

Preplant : 46-0-0 150 lbs/A

Date:

N/AStarter : N/A N/A N/APost plant : N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 31' Experiment Size: 0.5 A

Planting Date: See Factors Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

Dual II 1.5 pt/AHornet 4.0 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lb/A

Harvest Date: S: See FactorsG:10/24/16

Harvest Method: S: New Holland 707G: Massey Ferguson 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: S: 31' x 2.5'G: 31' x 5'

Harvest Plant Density: 39574

Design: RCB split-plot Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) April 142) May 033) May 154) May 315) June 166) July 01

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /14

1) August 262) September 093) September 26

Field: ARS392

Results: Tables 1603-01, 1603-02 & 1603-03.

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Date of Planting and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage and Corn Grain Yield

Experiment: 03DOP Year: 2016Trial ID: 6052

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 34000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Planting Date: Silage Harvest Date

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC54-38RIBHybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

Notes: Observed no lodging at grain harvest, no lodging values recorded.

69

Page 76: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1603-01. Planting Date Influence on Corn Grain Performance.

Arlington, WI - 2016.

Grain

Planting Test Lodged AGI Silking Early Black

date Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44 date dent 75% 50% 25% layer

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % $/A doy doy doy doy doy doy

April 14 268 18.6 58 0 0 0 845 196 227 236 244 251 260

May 3 263 18.5 57 0 0 0 830 199 228 239 248 255 262

May 16 254 20.4 57 0 0 0 792 201 236 244 251 259 268

May 31 258 22.1 56 0 0 0 795 211 247 256 263 273 285

June 16 216 28.3 51 0 0 0 639 224 261 268 277 286 -

July 1 126 49.9 50 0 0 0 317 240 284 291 - - -

Mean 231 26.3 55 0 0 0 703 212 247 256 257 265 269

Probability(%)

Planting Date 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Planting Date 18 1.2 2 - - - 54 1 2 3 3 3 3

Kernel Milk

70

Page 77: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1603-02. Planting Date and Harvest Timing Influence on Corn Silage Performance.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Planting Harvest Dry Matter Kernel KMR SMR VMR Crude In Vitro Milk perdate date yield Moisture Harvest Ears milk 0-5 0-5 0-10 protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre

tons/A % plants/A ears/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/AApril 14 10.6 58.5 34473 34848 36 1.8 1.6 3.4 6.8 15.6 31.9 88.3 63.2 35.9 3461 36930May 3 10.8 60.1 34036 34598 36 1.8 1.8 3.6 6.9 15.5 31.9 88.4 63.5 35.5 3440 37279May 16 10.3 62.8 33349 33599 49 2.5 2.0 4.4 7.0 16.7 33.2 87.7 62.8 34.0 3384 35039May 31 9.4 69.0 42967 43029 68 3.4 2.7 6.1 7.3 19.8 37.3 86.2 63.1 26.9 3057 29028June 16 7.9 76.1 46526 46589 86 4.3 3.6 7.9 7.7 26.0 46.1 81.2 59.4 14.7 2467 20395July 1 4.8 81.9 46089 46402 100 5.0 4.2 9.2 9.3 30.7 53.6 79.2 61.1 3.9 2149 10252

August 26 7.7 74.9 40843 41124 94 4.7 4.0 8.7 8.2 23.6 43.4 84.2 64.3 18.2 2753 22371September 9 9.1 69.2 38939 39469 62 3.1 2.3 5.4 7.4 20.2 38.5 85.3 62.0 25.3 2966 28283September 26 10.1 60.1 38939 38939 31 1.6 1.7 3.3 7.0 18.3 35.2 86.0 60.2 31.9 3260 33808

April 14 August 26 10.1 67.1 35785 36159 82 4.1 3.7 7.8 7.2 16.7 33.7 89.2 68.1 32.9 3434 34874April 14 September 9 10.3 61.2 33349 34099 27 1.3 1.0 2.3 7.0 16.1 32.5 87.5 61.8 33.7 3306 34148April 14 September 26 11.5 47.2 34286 34286 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 6.4 14.0 29.5 88.1 59.8 41.0 3644 41768May 3 August 26 9.8 69.5 34286 35223 85 4.3 3.7 8.0 7.1 18.4 36.0 87.4 65.0 29.4 3212 31362May 3 September 9 10.6 61.3 33349 34099 22 1.1 1.2 2.3 6.9 15.3 31.8 88.3 63.2 35.1 3399 36045May 3 September 26 12.0 49.5 34473 34473 0 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.8 12.8 28.1 89.4 62.2 42.1 3707 44431May 16 August 26 9.2 70.7 33724 34099 100 5.0 3.7 8.7 7.5 18.0 35.5 88.2 66.7 28.7 3199 29553May 16 September 9 10.7 63.0 32225 32600 48 2.4 1.5 3.9 6.9 15.5 31.8 88.3 63.2 36.3 3497 37462May 16 September 26 11.0 54.7 34099 34099 0 0.0 0.7 0.7 6.6 16.6 32.4 86.6 58.6 36.9 3455 38102May 31 August 26 8.2 75.5 44778 44778 100 5.0 4.0 9.0 7.8 22.7 41.5 85.3 64.8 18.1 2645 21709May 31 September 9 9.8 70.7 41780 41967 77 3.8 2.6 6.4 7.3 18.9 35.6 87.0 63.6 29.6 3189 31175May 31 September 26 10.2 60.9 42342 42342 28 1.4 1.6 3.0 6.8 17.7 34.7 86.4 60.9 33.1 3335 34200June 16 August 26 5.7 81.6 47401 47401 100 5.0 4.0 9.0 8.5 31.9 55.5 76.6 57.8 0.0 1778 10214June 16 September 9 8.5 76.3 47963 48150 100 5.0 3.6 8.6 7.6 24.3 43.7 82.7 60.5 17.3 2579 21779June 16 September 26 9.6 70.4 44216 44216 58 2.9 3.2 6.1 6.9 21.7 39.2 84.2 59.8 26.9 3044 29193July 1 August 26 2.9 85.2 49087 49087 100 5.0 4.7 9.7 10.9 34.0 58.0 78.8 63.4 0.0 2250 6511July 1 September 9 5.0 82.9 44965 45902 100 5.0 3.7 8.7 8.5 31.1 55.2 77.8 59.8 0.0 1823 9090July 1 September 26 6.4 77.6 44216 44216 100 5.0 4.2 9.2 8.4 27.0 47.4 81.1 60.2 11.7 2372 15154

Mean 9.0 68.1 39574 39844 62.6 3.1 2.6 5.8 7.5 20.7 39.0 85 62 25 2993 28153.9Probability(%)Planting Date (D) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0Harvest Timing (H) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0D x H 0.5 0.0 6.3 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3

LSD (0.10)Planting Date (D) 0.6 1.1 1369 1518 2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 2.0 1.6 103 2553Harvest Timing (H) 0.3 0.7 914 1013 1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.1 69 1427D x H 0.8 1.8 2238 NS 3 0.1 0 0.5 0.6 1.8 2.1 1.8 2.9 2.7 168 3707

Whole PlantDensity

71

Page 78: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1603-03. Planting Date and Hybrid Influence on Corn Leaf Development.

Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Date of Observation Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

planting date collars method leaves height

day of year no./plant no./plant no./plant inches

146 2.7 3.8 4.3 3.6

158 5.0 6.5 7.4 11.3

172 6.8 9.0 10.9 26.4

187 9.6 11.8 13.1 49.5

201 13.4 14.2 15.1 70.2

214 16.0 16.6 17.1 86.6

228 18.0 18.2 18.4 98.1

April 14 13.1 14.2 14.9 61.4

May 3 12.1 13.1 13.8 60.4

May 16 12.4 13.3 14.3 66.9

May 31 12.2 13.4 14.2 64.1

June 16 11.0 12.4 13.3 59.0

July 1 8.2 9.5 10.7 37.8

April 14 146 3.5 4.7 5.0 4.3

April 14 158 6.0 7.8 8.8 13.0

April 14 172 9.0 11.7 14.0 36.2

April 14 187 13.8 15.7 17.0 74.5

April 14 201 19.8 19.8 19.8 101.0

April 14 214 19.8 19.8 19.8 99.0

April 14 228 19.8 19.8 19.8 101.7

May 3 146 1.8 2.8 3.5 3.0

May 3 158 5.0 6.5 7.3 12.8

May 3 172 7.7 9.8 12.2 31.3

May 3 187 12.0 14.3 15.8 67.7

May 3 201 19.3 19.3 19.3 102.2

May 3 214 19.3 19.3 19.3 102.7

May 3 228 19.3 19.3 19.3 102.8

May 16 146 - - - -

May 16 158 4.0 5.2 6.0 8.2

May 16 172 6.7 8.7 10.5 29.2

May 16 187 10.5 13.0 14.5 60.5

May 16 201 16.7 16.8 18.2 96.2

May 16 214 18.2 18.2 18.2 103.3

May 16 228 18.2 18.2 18.2 104.3

Continued

72

Page 79: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1603-03. Planting Date and Hybrid Influence on Corn Leaf Development.

(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Leaf Development

Date of Observation Leaf Hail adjusters Total Plant

planting date collars method leaves height

day of year no./plant no./plant no./plant inches

May 31 146 - - - -

May 31 158 - - - -

May 31 172 4.0 5.8 6.8 9.0

May 31 187 7.2 9.7 11.0 32.7

May 31 201 11.8 13.7 15.0 70.7

May 31 214 19.0 19.0 19.0 102.7

May 31 228 19.0 19.0 19.0 105.7

June 16 146 - - - -

June 16 158 - - - -

June 16 172 - - - -

June 16 187 4.7 6.3 7.0 12.0

June 16 201 7.8 10.0 11.3 39.7

June 16 214 12.3 14.2 15.7 75.5

June 16 228 19.2 19.2 19.2 109.0

July 1 146 - - - -

July 1 158 - - - -

July 1 172 - - - -

July 1 187 - - - -

July 1 201 4.7 5.7 6.7 11.5

July 1 214 7.3 9.3 10.7 36.5

July 1 228 12.7 13.5 14.7 65.3

11.9 13.0 13.8 60.1

Probability(%)

Date of Planting (D) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sample DOY (S) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

D x S 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Date of Planting (D) 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.4

Sample DOY (S) 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.8

D x S 0.4 0.6 0.5 4.4

73

Page 80: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.9 P (ppm) 51 K (ppm) 124

Preplant : 46-0-0 150 lbs/A

Date:

N/AStarter : N/A N/A N/APost plant : N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator

None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 60' Experiment Size: 1.0 Acre

Planting Date: 5/18/16 Row Width: See FactorsPlanting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Kinze InterRow Planter

Medal II EC 1.5 pt/AHornet 4.0 oz/A

None

Harvest Date: S: 9/27/16G:10/21/16

Harvest Method: S:USDA KemperG:MF 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: S:3.75' x 23'G:5' x 33'

Harvest Plant Density: 33688

Design: RCB Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) 15 inch2) 30 inch

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/1 /14

1) 260002) 320003) 380004) 44000

Field: ARS392

Results: Table 1606-01.

Manure: None

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Kent Kohn, Thierno Diallo

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Plant Density and Row Spacing Effects on Yield and Quality of Corn Silage

Experiment: 06PDxRS Year: 2016Trial ID: 6053

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Row Spacing: Plant Density: (plants/A)

Plot Management

Pioneer P0157AMXHybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A

OM (%)

N/A

2.9

74

Page 81: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1606-01. Plant Density and Row Spacing Effects on Corn Silage Yield and QualityArlington, WI - 2016.

Target Row Harvest Ear Test Lodged AGI SilkDensity spacing Density Density Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44 doyplants/A inches plants/A plants/A bu/A % lbs/bu % % % $/A

15 30938 34438 232 20.7 56 0 0 0 722 20230 36438 38063 245 20.4 56 0 0 0 762 203

26000 27000 30000 225 20.8 57 0 0 0 699 20232000 30250 34375 235 20.6 56 0 0 0 731 20238000 36250 38000 245 20.3 56 0 0 0 765 20344000 41250 42625 248 20.4 56 1 0 1 772 203

26000 15 23250 27250 211 20.8 57 0 0 0 654 20232000 15 26750 32500 227 20.9 56 0 0 0 706 20238000 15 33750 36000 243 20.4 56 0 0 0 755 20244000 15 40000 42000 248 20.6 56 1 0 1 771 20326000 30 30750 32750 240 20.8 56 0 0 0 745 20332000 30 33750 36250 243 20.3 56 1 0 1 756 20338000 30 38750 40000 248 20.2 56 1 1 0 774 20344000 30 42500 43250 248 20.3 56 0 0 0 772 203

Mean 33688 36250 238 20.5 56 0 0 0 742 203Probability(%)Row Spacing (S) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 9.6 73.6 41.2 55.8 0.0 4.0Density (D) 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 49.5 95.2 32.9 72.6 0.0 9.1S x D 11.1 46.8 0.9 24.0 88.3 29.1 41.2 30.3 1.1 53.7LSD (0.10)Row Spacing (S) 1838 2286 7 0.3 1 NS NS NS 22 1Density (D) 1299 1616 5 0.2 NS NS NS NS 16 0S x D NS NS 10 NS NS NS NS NS 31 NSContinued

Grain

75

Page 82: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1606-01. Plant Density and Row Spacing Effects on Corn Silage Yield and Quality(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Target Row Dry Matter Kernel KMR SMR VMR Crude In Vitro Milk perDensity spacing yield Moisture milk 0-5 0-5 0-10 protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acreplants/A inches tons/A % % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/A

15 11.2 52.0 1.6 0.1 0.3 0.4 6.8 16.4 32.1 86.9 59.5 38.7 3598 4045230 10.7 50.2 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.6 16.1 31.7 87.3 60.1 39.9 3668 39225

26000 10.1 52.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.9 16.2 32.1 87.0 59.4 38.8 3615 3655432000 10.6 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.9 17.2 33.4 86.5 59.8 37.0 3542 3744438000 11.4 49.8 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 6.7 15.6 30.9 87.7 60.4 40.7 3680 4217844000 11.7 49.1 3.3 0.2 0.5 0.6 6.4 16.0 31.3 87.3 59.6 40.9 3696 43178

26000 15 10.2 52.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 7.0 15.7 31.5 87.4 59.9 38.9 3620 3710532000 15 10.7 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.8 17.7 33.7 86.3 59.5 36.1 3477 3732838000 15 11.7 51.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 6.8 15.7 31.1 87.3 59.4 39.8 3623 4265744000 15 12.2 50.0 6.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 6.5 16.4 32.1 86.9 59.1 40.2 3672 4471826000 30 10.0 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 6.7 16.7 32.6 86.6 58.9 38.7 3610 3600432000 30 10.4 52.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 6.9 16.8 33.1 86.8 60.1 37.9 3607 3756138000 30 11.1 48.3 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 6.6 15.4 30.6 88.1 61.3 41.6 3736 4169944000 30 11.2 48.2 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.3 15.6 30.6 87.8 60.1 41.6 3719 41638

Mean 10.9 51.1 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.4 6.7 16.2 31.9 87.1 59.8 39.3 3633 39839Probability(%)Row Spacing (S) 0.3 2.0 41.8 41.8 47.9 29.7 1.5 26.1 14.1 49.5 84.4 4.7 22.6 1.2Density (D) 8.2 9.2 43.5 43.5 21.6 66.5 12.5 65.6 61.9 50.7 47.9 25.3 22.4 43.3S x D 83.5 89.1 39.6 39.6 46.2 26.2 60.0 69.3 65.9 66.5 64.3 86.9 80.3 89.5LSD (0.10)Row Spacing (S) 0.7 2.4 NS NS NS NS 0.2 NS NS NS NS 2.5 NS 3737Density (D) 0.5 1.7 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSS x D NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Whole Plant

76

Page 83: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: See Factors

pH 6.1 P (ppm) 11 K (ppm) 135OM (%) 3.5

Preplant : 0-0-60 150 lbs

Date:

4 /19/16

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : 28-0-0 CC: 190CA: 160

6/10/166/10/16

NT

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 75' x 60 Experiment Size: 3.47

Planting Date: C:5/17/16A: 5/20/16

Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: C:1.5"A: 0.25"Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

A: JD750 No-Till Drill

C: Hornet WDG @ 4 oz/acre 5/23/16 Medal II EC @ 24 oz/A 5/23/16A: Durango DMA @ 28 oz/a 6/18/16

N/A

Harvest Date: C: 10/17/16S: 9/19/16A: 5/21 6/24; 7/19; 8/22

Harvest Method: C: MF 8XPS: NH707Al: Almaco Harvester

Harvest Plot Size: G:5' x 71' S: 2.5' x 71' A:4.33' x 71'

Design: RCB split-split-block Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) AAACC-2A 2) AAACC-3A 3) AAACC-1C 4) AAACC-2C 5) AAACC-1A 6) AACC-1C 7) AACC-2C

8) AACC- 1A 9) AACC- 2A10) AACC- 1C(Silage)11) AACC- 1A12) AACC- 2A13) AACC- 2C(Silage)14) CC- Grain & Silage (S/S,S/G,G/S,G/G)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test

Notes:

Date: 11/16/16

Field: ARS333

Results: Tables 1609-01,1609-02 & 1609-03

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo,Kent Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Alfalfa - Corn Response to Rotation

Experiment: 09AC Year: 2016Trial ID: 6059

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants/A

Rotation - 2016 Treatments:

Plot Management

C: Pioneer P0175 AMXA: DeKalb - 40-51RR

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

77

Page 84: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-01. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study - Corn.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test Harvest *AGIRotation Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

AAACC-1C 225 24.0 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 33667 685AAACC-2C 236 24.8 51.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 33000 713

AACC-1C 252 23.4 52.2 1.0 0.0 1.0 31667 768AACC-2C 228 24.3 51.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31667 692

CC-CC 206 27.0 51.2 1.1 1.1 0.0 32333 614

Mean 229 24.7 51.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 32467 694Probability(%)Rotation (R) 0.5 0.2 74.9 58.4 46.1 46.1 56.3 0.4LSD(0.10)Rotation (R) 15 1.0 NS NS NS NS NS 47*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income.

Lodged

78

Page 85: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-02. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study -Alfalfa.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Rotation 21-May 24-Jun 19-Jul 22-Aug TotalT Dm/A T Dm/A T Dm/A T Dm/A T Dm/A

AAACC-1A -- -- 0.5 1.2 1.73AAACC-2A 2.0 1.1 0.7 0.9 4.74AAACC-3A 2.3 1.7 1.0 1.1 6.08

AACC(S)-1A -- -- 0.9 1.0 1.90AACC(S)-2A 2.3 1.6 1.0 1.2 6.09

AACC-1A -- -- 0.7 1.2 1.97AACC-2A 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.1 5.19

Mean 2.1 1.5 0.8 1.1 3.96Probability (%)Rotation (R) 62.7 1.4 6.6 5.9 0.00

LSD 10%Rotation (R) NS 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.08-- Not enough forage to harvest.

Harvest Date

79

Page 86: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-03. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study - Silage.Arlington, WI 2016

Dry Matter Kernel Crude In Vitro HarvestRotation Yield Moisture milk protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre density

T/A % % % % % % % % lb lb plants/A

AACC-1Cs 5.3 58.7 20.0 6.9 16.8 33.3 87.5 62.4 36.8 3590 18987 32149

AACC-2Cs 5.1 58.7 21.7 7.1 17.7 34.0 86.7 60.9 35.7 3515 17789 31003

Mean 5.2 58.7 20.8 7.0 17.3 33.6 87.1 61.6 36.3 3552 18388 31576

Probability(%)Rotation (R) 47.1 98.0 42.3 44.6 41.6 64.1 28.9 10.6 45.0 29.2 18.9 36.9

LSD(0.10)Rotation (R) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Whole PlantMilk per

80

Page 87: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: See Factors

pH 7.1 P (ppm) 27 K (ppm) 77OM (%) 3.7

Preplant : N/A N/A

Date:

N/A

Starter : 9-11-30-6S-Zn6/24/6-0.25Zn

150 lb/A5 gal/A

5/06/165/06/16

Post plant : 32-0-0 40 gal/A 6 /29/16

A: Fall chisel

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 75' x 60 Experiment Size: 3.47

Planting Date: C:5/6/16A: 5/9 & 8/3/16 (replant)

Row Width: C: 30"A: 7.5"

Planting Depth: C:1.5"A: 0.25"Planting Method: C: JD750 Planter

A: Great plains No-Till Drill

C: Brawl II 1.67 pt/acre Hornet WDG @ 3.0 oz/acre Roundup PM 32.0 oz/acre Status 2.5 oz/acreA: none

N/A

Harvest Date: C: 11/2/16S: 9/14/16A: 6/7; 7/4; 8/28/16

Harvest Method: C: MF 8XPS:Hand harvestAl: MARS forage Harvester

Harvest Plot Size: G:5' x 60' S: 2.5' x 10' A: 3.5' x 10'

Design: RCB split-split-block Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) AAACC-1A 2) AAACC-2A 3) AAACC-3A 4) AAACC-1C 5) AAACC-2C 6) AACC-2A 7) AACC-1C

8) AACC- 2C 9) AACC- 1A10) AACC- 2A11) AACC- 1C (Silage)12) AACC- 2C (Silage)13) AACC- 1A14) CC- Grain & Silage (S/S,S/G,G/S,G/G)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test

Notes:

Date: 5 /01/15

Field: 402

Results: Tables 1509-04,1509-05 & 1509-06

Manure: N/A

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo,Kent Kohn, Jason Cavadini

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Alfalfa - Corn Response to Rotation

Experiment: 09AC Year: 2016Trial ID: 6149

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: C: 35000 plants/AA: 17 lb/A

Rotation - 2016 Treatments:

Plot Management

C: Pioneer P9811 AMX (88 HHX,LL,RR2)A: Legacy L446(RR)

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

81

Page 88: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-04. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study - Corn.Marshfield, 2016

Test Harvest *AGIRotation Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % plants/A $/A

AAACC-1C 206 19.2 53.3 0.8 0.8 35042 646AAACC-2C 181 19.7 52.0 0.5 0.5 36300 565

AACC-1C 219 19.3 53.4 0.5 0.5 36397 688AACC-2C 214 19.2 53.0 0.3 0.3 36203 670

CC-CC 161 19.1 52.9 1.3 1.3 36784 507

Mean 196 19.3 52.9 0.7 0.7 36145 615Probability(%)Rotation (R) 0.0 78.6 77.6 25.4 25.4 27.0 0.0LSD(0.10)Rotation (R) 11 NS NS NS NS NS 37*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income.

Lodged

82

Page 89: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-05. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study -Alfalfa.Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Rotation 21-May 24-Jun 19-Jul TotalT Dm/A T Dm/A T Dm/A T Dm/A

AAACC-2A 1.85 1.02 1.38 4.25

AAACC-3A 1.83 1.13 1.41 4.36

Mean 1.84 1.07 1.39 4.31

Probability (%)

Rotation (R) 70.9 52.2 47.3 54.6

LSD 10%

Rotation (R) NS NS NS NS

Harvest Date

83

Page 90: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1609-06. Alfalfa-Corn Rotation Study - Silage.Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Kernel HarvestRotation Yield Moisture milk Population CP ADF NDF NDFD NFC Starch TDN Ton Acre

tn dm/A % % ppa % % % % % % % lb lb

AACC-1Cs 9.4 63.0 50 34848 6.2 22.9 36.7 59.0 56.9 44.0 76.7 3930 36404

AACC-2Cs 8.5 64.9 50 34848 6.3 22.8 37.3 59.7 57.0 44.0 78.4 4053 34377

Mean 9.0 64.0 50 34848 6.2 22.8 37.0 59.3 56.9 44.0 77.6 3992 35390

Probability(%)

Rotation (R) 42.1 48.1 -- 100.0 64.4 92.1 64.1 26.0 92.8 97.9 52.0 50.8 28.4

LSD(0.10)

Rotation (R) NS NS -- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Milk per

84

Page 91: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Previous Crop: See factors

pH 5.8 P (ppm) 23 K (ppm) 200OM (%) 3.2

Preplant : N/A N/A

Date:

N/AStarter : N/A N/A N/APost plant : 28-0-0 CC: 190

CS: 1606 /12/16

Soil Finisher

Irrigation: No

Plot Size Seeded: MP: 30' x 70' Experiment Size: 2.7 A

Planting Date: C: 5/17/16S: 5/5/16

Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD 1700 with RTK

Radar LV 16 oz/A 4/29/16Durango DMA 22 oz/A 4/29/16Medal II EC 24 oz/A 4/29/16Durango DMA 22 oz/A 6/18/16

See Seed Treatments

Harvest Date:C:10/27/16S: 10/18/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP plot combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 31'

Design: RCB split-split-plot Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

1) NT2) CT

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test

Notes:

Date: 11/1 /16

1) CCCCCSSSSS-4C2) CCCCCSSSSS-3C3) CCCCCSSSSS-2C4) CCCCCSSSSS-1C5) CCCCCSSSSS-5S6) CCCCCSSSSS-4S7) CCCCCSSSSS-3S8) CCCCCSSSSS-2S9) CCCCCSSSSS-1S

10) CCCCCSSSSS-5C11) CC-1C12) CS-1S13) CS-1C14) SS-1S

Field: 334

Results: Tables1609-07 & 1609-08

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn,

County: ColumbiaSupported By: HATCH

Title: Corn - Soybean Response to Tillage and RotationExperiment: 09CS Year: 2016Trial ID: 6061

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: Corn: 32500 Plants/ASoybean: 150000 Plants/A

Tillage Rotation: 2016 Treatments

Plot Management

C: Pioneer P0157 AMX S: Syngenta S20T6

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

85

Page 92: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1609-07. Corn/Soybean Rotation and Tillage Study - Corn.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged Harvest AGITillage Rotation Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

Conv 233 22.6 53.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 28622 713Notill 216 23.4 53.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 29843 661

1C 244 21.9 53.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 29403 7512C 226 23.3 52.7 0.2 0.2 0.0 28279 6913C 205 23.5 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 28818 6244C 218 23.4 53.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 29649 6665C 223 23.7 53.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 29485 681C 238 22.6 53.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 30375 731

CC 217 22.9 53.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 28618 666

Conv 1C 246 21.9 53.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 28572 757Conv 2C 229 22.8 52.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 26721 703Conv 3C 221 23.0 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 29157 676Conv 4C 227 22.9 53.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 29274 696Conv 5C 240 23.1 53.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 28759 734Conv C 245 22.4 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 30024 752Conv CC 220 22.5 53.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 27846 676

Notill 1C 242 21.9 53.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 30234 745Notill 2C 223 23.8 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29836 679Notill 3C 188 24.0 53.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 28478 572Notill 4C 209 23.9 53.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 30024 636Notill 5C 207 24.3 52.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 30211 628Notill C 232 22.8 53.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 30726 709Notill CC 215 23.2 53.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 29391 656

Mean 225 23.0 53.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 29232 687Probability(%)Tillage (T) 1.3 0.8 21.2 78.8 48.1 70.7 8.6 1.1Rotation (R) 0.0 0.0 30.7 20.8 20.8 28.3 31.3 0.0T x R 4.8 14.6 70.2 41.7 17.2 96.1 56.4 3.7LSD(0.10)Tillage (T) 7 0.3 NS NS NS NS 1139 22Rotation (R) 10 0.4 NS NS NS NS NS 29T x R 14 NS NS NS NS NS NS 41

86

Page 93: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1609-08. Corn/Soybean Rotation and Tillage Study - Soybean.Arlington, WI - 2016.

AGITillage Rotation Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

Conv 59 13.6 487Notill 60 13.3 493

1S 71 13.4 5822S 63 13.4 5173S 52 13.2 4314S 57 13.6 4725S 55 13.4 451S 68 13.4 562

SS 50 13.5 414

Conv 1S 71 13.6 585Conv 2S 59 13.5 489Conv 3S 53 13.4 439Conv 4S 55 13.7 457Conv 5S 53 13.5 437Conv S 66 13.5 541Conv SS 56 13.6 462

Notill 1S 70 13.2 579Notill 2S 66 13.2 546Notill 3S 51 13.1 424Notill 4S 59 13.5 488Notill 5S 56 13.3 465Notill S 71 13.2 583Notill SS 44 13.3 366

Mean 59 13.4 490Probability(%)Tillage (T) 54.7 0.3 52.3Rotation (R) 0.0 0.0 0.0T x R 0.0 77.8 0.0LSD(0.10)Tillage (T) NS 0.1 NSRotation (R) 3 0.1 26T x R 4 NS 36

87

Page 94: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Previous Crop: See factors

pH: 5.7 P (ppm) 24 K (ppm) 92OM (%) 3.1

Preplant : N/A N/ADate:

N/AStarter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : 28-0-0 C: 200 lb/AS: 0 lb/A

W: 80 lb/A

6 /13/16

Fungicide: N/A

Plot Size Seeded: MP: 60' x 60'; SP: 10' x 30'Experiment Size: 3.47 A

Planting Date: C: 5/17/16S: 5/10/16W:10/15/15

Row Width: C,S: 30"W: 0.5"

Planting Depth: C: 1.5"S,W: 1"

Planting Method: C,S: JD1700 with RTKW: JD750 No-Till Drill

C,S:Medal II 24 fl oz/a 4/29/16, Radar LV16 oz/a 4/29/16; Durango DMA 22 oz/a 4/29/16 Durango DMA 28 oz/a 6/18/16

Harvest Date: C: 10/16/16, CS: 9/17/16S: 10/28/16, W: 7/29/16

Harvest Method: C:MF 8XP combineCS: NH 707S,W: Almaco Plot combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 26

Design: RCB split-split-block Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) CC 2) SS 3) WW 4) CS-C 5) CS-S 6) GS1: CSW-W 7) GS1: CSW-C 8) GS1: CSW-S 9) GS2: CWS-S10) GS2: CWS-C11) GS2: CWS-W 12) Flex: CWS-S13) Flex: CWS-C14) Flex: CWS-W

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Soil Test:

Notes: Even up year.

Date: 11/1 /16

1) UTC2) Priaxor

1) 02) 403) 804) 1205) 1606) 200

Field: 335

Results: Tables1509-09 to 1509-12

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WIPersonnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn - Soybean - Wheat Response to Rotation: NrateExperiment: 09CSW Year: 2016Trial ID: 6062

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: C:35000 ppa

Rotation: 2016 Treatments Fungicide:Nirogen Rate (lb N/A)

Plot Management

C:Pioneer P0175AMXS: Syngenta S20Y2W: Pioneer 25R40

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A

Plano Silt

N/A

88

Page 95: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 09 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation - Corn

Arlington, WI - 2016.Test Lodged Harvest AGI

Rotation Nirotgen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root plants $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CC-C 221 28.1 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 25813 653

CS-C 229 26.7 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28233 683

CSW-C 258 26.5 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 29112 773

CWS-C(e) 224 25.5 52.1 0.1 0.1 -- 28628 675

0 238 26.8 52.7 0.1 0.1 -- 28126 709

40 235 26.9 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 27480 702

80 228 26.5 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 27696 681

120 233 26.4 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 697

160 236 26.7 52.2 0.0 0.0 -- 28233 704

200 229 26.9 52.3 0.0 0.0 -- 27749 683

Priaxor 233 26.8 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 27947 696

UTC 233 26.6 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 27947 695

CC-C 0 227 27.7 52.8 0.0 0.0 -- 26459 674

CC-C 40 226 28.1 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 24738 667

CC-C 80 209 28.0 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 26136 618

CC-C 120 225 27.4 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 26566 668

CC-C 160 221 29.0 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 24953 649

CC-C 200 218 28.3 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 26028 644

CS-C 0 238 26.5 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 29040 711

CS-C 40 229 27.2 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 27212 682

CS-C 80 230 26.3 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 27964 688

CS-C 120 223 26.9 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 664

CS-C 160 223 26.2 52.3 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 667

CS-C 200 230 26.9 52.2 0.0 0.0 -- 27534 685

CSW-C 0 262 26.9 53.4 0.0 0.0 -- 29685 782

CSW-C 40 261 26.4 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29363 780

CSW-C 80 253 26.7 52.8 0.0 0.0 -- 28287 755

CSW-C 120 256 25.9 53.1 0.0 0.0 -- 28932 768

CSW-C 160 265 26.3 52.2 0.0 0.0 -- 29470 794

CSW-C 200 254 26.6 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 28932 758

89

Page 96: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 09 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation - Corn

Arlington, WI - 2016.Test Lodged Harvest AGI

Rotation Nirotgen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root plants $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CWS-C(e) 0 223 25.9 52.1 0.4 0.4 -- 27319 669

CWS-C(e) 40 226 25.7 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 678

CWS-C(e) 80 219 25.1 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 662

CWS-C(e) 120 228 25.4 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 29255 687

CWS-C(e) 160 234 25.3 51.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29685 707

CWS-C(e) 200 215 26.0 51.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28502 646

CC-C Priaxor 223 28.2 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 25993 658

CC-C UTC 219 28.0 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 25634 649

CS-C Priaxor 230 26.7 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28144 687

CS-C UTC 227 26.6 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28323 679

CSW-C Priaxor 257 26.6 52.8 0.0 0.0 -- 29004 769

CSW-C UTC 259 26.3 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 29219 777

CWS-C(e) Priaxor 223 25.6 51.8 0.1 0.1 -- 28646 671

CWS-C(e) UTC 225 25.5 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 678

0 Priaxor 238 27.1 52.9 0.2 0.2 -- 28233 707

0 UTC 238 26.4 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28018 711

40 Priaxor 233 26.9 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 27642 696

40 UTC 237 26.8 52.8 0.0 0.0 -- 27319 707

80 Priaxor 225 26.6 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 26781 674

80 UTC 230 26.4 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 688

120 Priaxor 235 26.5 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29040 704

120 UTC 230 26.3 53.0 0.0 0.0 -- 27749 690

160 Priaxor 236 26.7 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28018 706

160 UTC 235 26.6 52.0 0.0 0.0 -- 28448 703

200 Priaxor 232 26.8 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 27964 692

200 UTC 226 27.0 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 27534 674

CC-C 0 Priaxor 231 27.9 53.1 0.0 0.0 -- 27104 683

CC-C 0 UTC 224 27.5 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 25813 666

CC-C 40 Priaxor 224 28.2 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 25168 662

CC-C 40 UTC 227 28.0 53.2 0.0 0.0 -- 24308 672

CC-C 80 Priaxor 202 28.1 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 24308 596

CC-C 80 UTC 216 27.9 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 27964 639

90

Page 97: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 09 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation - Corn

Arlington, WI - 2016.Test Lodged Harvest AGI

Rotation Nirotgen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root plants $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CC-C 120 Priaxor 229 27.6 53.3 0.0 0.0 -- 26889 680

CC-C 120 UTC 220 27.2 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 26244 656

CC-C 160 Priaxor 219 29.4 53.3 0.0 0.0 -- 24738 641

CC-C 160 UTC 223 28.6 51.9 0.0 0.0 -- 25168 657

CC-C 200 Priaxor 232 27.7 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 27749 687

CC-C 200 UTC 204 28.8 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 24308 601

CS-C 0 Priaxor 234 26.4 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 699

CS-C 0 UTC 242 26.6 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 29685 724

CS-C 40 Priaxor 228 27.3 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 27749 677

CS-C 40 UTC 231 27.2 52.0 0.0 0.0 -- 26674 687

CS-C 80 Priaxor 234 26.2 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 26674 703

CS-C 80 UTC 225 26.4 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29255 673

CS-C 120 Priaxor 225 27.0 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29900 671

CS-C 120 UTC 220 26.8 53.3 0.0 0.0 -- 27749 658

CS-C 160 Priaxor 233 26.3 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 29470 696

CS-C 160 UTC 212 26.1 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 28180 637

CS-C 200 Priaxor 228 27.2 51.9 0.0 0.0 -- 26674 677

CS-C 200 UTC 232 26.6 52.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 692

CSW-C 0 Priaxor 260 27.8 53.5 0.0 0.0 -- 30116 771

CSW-C 0 UTC 265 26.0 53.3 0.0 0.0 -- 29255 794

CSW-C 40 Priaxor 261 26.2 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 782

CSW-C 40 UTC 261 26.6 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 29900 779

CSW-C 80 Priaxor 255 27.0 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 27964 760

CSW-C 80 UTC 251 26.3 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 750

CSW-C 120 Priaxor 252 26.0 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 29040 757

CSW-C 120 UTC 259 25.7 53.7 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 780

CSW-C 160 Priaxor 266 25.8 52.3 0.0 0.0 -- 29255 800

CSW-C 160 UTC 264 26.8 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 29685 787

CSW-C 200 Priaxor 250 26.7 52.9 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 747

CSW-C 200 UTC 258 26.5 53.1 0.0 0.0 -- 29040 770

CWS-C(e) 0 Priaxor 226 26.1 52.3 0.9 0.9 -- 27319 678

CWS-C(e) 0 UTC 220 25.7 51.9 0.0 0.0 -- 27319 660

91

Page 98: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 09 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation - Corn

Arlington, WI - 2016.Test Lodged Harvest AGI

Rotation Nirotgen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root plants $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CWS-C(e) 40 Priaxor 221 25.8 51.5 0.0 0.0 -- 28825 665

CWS-C(e) 40 UTC 230 25.6 53.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 691

CWS-C(e) 80 Priaxor 211 25.3 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 28180 635

CWS-C(e) 80 UTC 228 24.9 52.7 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 689

CWS-C(e) 120 Priaxor 235 25.3 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 30331 709

CWS-C(e) 120 UTC 221 25.6 52.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28180 665

CWS-C(e) 160 Priaxor 227 25.3 51.4 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 685

CWS-C(e) 160 UTC 242 25.2 52.1 0.0 0.0 -- 30761 729

CWS-C(e) 200 Priaxor 218 25.7 50.9 0.0 0.0 -- 28610 656

CWS-C(e) 200 UTC 212 26.2 52.2 0.0 0.0 -- 28395 635

Mean 233 26.7 52.6 0.0 0.0 -- 27947 696

Probability(%)

Rotation (R) 1.2 0.4 37.9 45.5 45.5 -- 0.2 0.8

Nitrogen (N) 4.1 74.8 12.2 43.0 43.0 -- 62.4 8.6

Fungicide (F) 77.2 19.6 69.7 32.2 32.2 -- 100.0 87.9

R x N 29.8 87.9 91.8 47.4 47.4 -- 73.0 36.9

R x F 61.1 94.1 6.0 40.1 40.1 -- 90.5 64.0

N x F 59.6 47.7 47.8 42.8 42.8 -- 9.8 60.3

R x N x F 13.2 26.9 71.1 47.1 47.1 -- 40.6 14.4

LSD(0.10)

Rotation (R) 16 0.8 NS NS NS -- 953 45

Nitrogen (N) 6 NS NS NS NS -- NS 19

Fungicide (F) NS NS NS NS NS -- NS NS

R x N NS NS NS NS NS -- NS NS

R x F NS NS 0.8 NS NS -- NS NS

N x F NS NS NS NS NS -- 1333 NS

R x N x F NS NS NS NS NS -- NS NS

AGI*: Adjusted Gross Income.

92

Page 99: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609-10. Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation - Corn Silage Arlington, WI - 2016.

Nitrogen Dry Matter Kernel Crude In Vitro Plant

Rate Fungicide Yield Moisture milk protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population

lbs/A tons/A % % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A

0 8.4 56.9 23.3 6.5 16.6 33.1 87.7 62.9 37.1 3583 30165 2947040 8.9 55.3 11.7 6.5 17.0 33.4 87.4 62.2 36.5 3538 31750 2871780 8.9 54.5 20.8 6.3 18.0 34.4 86.1 59.5 35.6 3449 30891 29148120 8.8 54.8 10.8 6.6 16.4 32.9 87.6 62.4 37.4 3599 31509 27749160 9.2 55.7 21.7 7.2 16.7 33.2 87.6 62.7 36.6 3596 33136 28287200 8.3 55.5 20.8 6.6 16.6 32.6 87.3 61.2 38.1 3609 30027 28610

Priaxor 8.8 55.6 17.8 6.7 16.7 33.1 87.5 62.4 37.2 3594 31517 28323

UTC 8.7 55.3 18.6 6.6 17.1 33.4 87.0 61.3 36.5 3531 30976 29004

0 Priaxor 9.2 55.8 23.3 6.6 16.1 32.6 88.1 63.8 37.7 3632 33238 303310 UTC 7.7 57.9 23.3 6.5 17.1 33.5 87.3 62.0 36.4 3534 27091 2861040 Priaxor 8.2 56.9 6.7 6.6 17.2 33.6 87.8 63.6 35.7 3516 29048 2710440 UTC 9.7 53.8 16.7 6.5 16.7 33.2 87.0 60.9 37.2 3561 34453 3033180 Priaxor 9.5 53.6 33.3 6.4 17.4 33.8 86.2 59.2 37.1 3538 33577 2990080 UTC 8.3 55.5 8.3 6.2 18.6 35.0 85.9 59.7 34.2 3360 28205 28395120 Priaxor 8.5 55.2 8.3 6.8 16.0 32.5 88.1 63.4 37.8 3644 31151 26674120 UTC 9.0 54.5 13.3 6.5 16.7 33.3 87.2 61.5 37.0 3553 31867 28825160 Priaxor 9.0 56.4 20.0 7.2 16.8 33.4 87.5 62.6 36.6 3602 32515 26674160 UTC 9.3 55.1 23.3 7.3 16.7 32.9 87.7 62.8 36.6 3589 33758 29900200 Priaxor 8.1 55.8 15.0 6.6 16.7 32.6 87.4 61.7 38.3 3633 29573 29255200 UTC 8.5 55.2 26.7 6.6 16.5 32.6 87.2 60.7 37.9 3586 30481 27964

Mean 8.7 55.5 18.2 6.6 16.9 33.2 87.3 61.8 36.9 3562 31246 28664Probability(%)Nitrogen (N) 71.2 78.2 15.9 0.9 50.2 71.2 30.3 8.5 69.8 46.0 84.1 87.6Fungicide (F) 97.6 76.7 80.6 45.8 48.1 62.3 30.7 13.7 46.2 22.0 71.9 42.7N x F 18.1 62.3 5.0 93.8 86.3 95.9 96.9 73.9 80.2 85.2 24.1 26.6LSD(0.10)Nitrogen (N) NS NS NS 0.4 NS NS NS 2.1 NS NS NS NSFungicide (F) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSN x F NS NS 14.1 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Milk per

Whole Plant

93

Page 100: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 11 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Soybean Arlington, WI - 2016.

AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

CSW-S 75 13.8 618

CWS-S 78 13.9 645

CWSL-S 72 13.9 594

SC-S 63 13.9 517

SS-S 55 13.8 455

0 74 13.9 605

40 69 13.8 567

80 69 13.9 572

120 66 13.9 544

160 67 13.8 555

200 67 13.8 551

Priaxor 68 13.9 562

UTC 69 13.9 569

CSW-S 0 82 14.0 673

CSW-S 40 77 13.7 635

CSW-S 80 76 13.7 626

CSW-S 120 73 13.9 603

CSW-S 160 69 13.8 564

CSW-S 200 74 13.9 608

CWS-S 0 82 14.0 676

CWS-S 40 77 13.8 631

CWS-S 80 81 13.9 670

CWS-S 120 77 14.0 631

CWS-S 160 77 13.7 632

CWS-S 200 77 13.9 631

CWSL-S 0 74 13.9 606

CWSL-S 40 74 13.7 612

CWSL-S 80 73 14.0 598

CWSL-S 120 73 14.0 600

CWSL-S 160 70 14.0 579

CWSL-S 200 69 13.9 571

SC-S 0 68 13.9 561

SC-S 40 63 14.0 519

SC-S 80 66 13.7 544

SC-S 120 56 14.0 462

SC-S 160 62 13.9 511

SC-S 200 61 13.9 503

continue

94

Page 101: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 11 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Soybean(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

SS-S 0 62 13.7 512

SS-S 40 53 13.9 439

SS-S 80 51 14.0 423

SS-S 120 51 13.8 423

SS-S 160 60 13.8 491

SS-S 200 54 13.6 442

CSW-S Priaxor 75 13.9 614

CSW-S UTC 76 13.8 622

CWS-S Priaxor 78 13.9 644

CWS-S UTC 79 13.9 647

CWSL-S Priaxor 73 13.9 600

CWSL-S UTC 72 13.9 589

SC-S Priaxor 61 13.9 506

SC-S UTC 64 13.9 527

SS-S Priaxor 54 13.8 448

SS-S UTC 56 13.8 461

0 Priaxor 73 13.9 600

0 UTC 74 13.9 611

40 Priaxor 68 13.9 557

40 UTC 70 13.7 578

80 Priaxor 69 13.8 567

80 UTC 70 13.9 577

120 Priaxor 68 13.9 557

120 UTC 64 13.9 531

160 Priaxor 67 13.8 550

160 UTC 68 13.8 560

200 Priaxor 66 13.9 543

200 UTC 68 13.8 559

CSW-S 0 Priaxor 81 14.0 663

CSW-S 0 UTC 83 13.9 684

CSW-S 40 Priaxor 77 13.9 636

CSW-S 40 UTC 77 13.5 633

CSW-S 80 Priaxor 75 13.7 619

CSW-S 80 UTC 77 13.7 632

CSW-S 120 Priaxor 76 13.9 629

CSW-S 120 UTC 70 13.9 576

CSW-S 160 Priaxor 65 13.9 533

CSW-S 160 UTC 72 13.8 595

continue

95

Page 102: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 11 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Soybean(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

CSW-S 200 Priaxor 73 13.8 602

CSW-S 200 UTC 75 13.9 614

CWS-S 0 Priaxor 83 14.2 686

CWS-S 0 UTC 81 13.8 667

CWS-S 40 Priaxor 73 13.8 602

CWS-S 40 UTC 80 13.8 660

CWS-S 80 Priaxor 81 13.9 664

CWS-S 80 UTC 82 13.9 676

CWS-S 120 Priaxor 81 13.9 667

CWS-S 120 UTC 72 14.0 596

CWS-S 160 Priaxor 75 13.6 620

CWS-S 160 UTC 78 13.7 644

CWS-S 200 Priaxor 76 13.8 625

CWS-S 200 UTC 78 13.9 638

CWSL-S 0 Priaxor 75 13.9 614

CWSL-S 0 UTC 73 14.0 598

CWSL-S 40 Priaxor 74 13.6 610

CWSL-S 40 UTC 75 13.7 615

CWSL-S 80 Priaxor 72 13.9 594

CWSL-S 80 UTC 73 14.1 603

CWSL-S 120 Priaxor 74 14.0 607

CWSL-S 120 UTC 72 13.9 594

CWSL-S 160 Priaxor 74 13.9 613

CWSL-S 160 UTC 66 14.0 546

CWSL-S 200 Priaxor 68 14.0 560

CWSL-S 200 UTC 71 13.8 581

SC-S 0 Priaxor 65 13.8 538SC-S 0 UTC 71 14.0 583SC-S 40 Priaxor 60 14.1 496SC-S 40 UTC 66 13.9 542SC-S 80 Priaxor 67 13.8 554SC-S 80 UTC 65 13.7 534

SC-S 120 Priaxor 56 14.1 460SC-S 120 UTC 56 14.0 465SC-S 160 Priaxor 60 13.8 497SC-S 160 UTC 64 13.9 525SC-S 200 Priaxor 60 13.9 491SC-S 200 UTC 63 13.9 515

SS-S 0 Priaxor 61 13.6 499SS-S 0 UTC 64 13.8 525continue

96

Page 103: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 11 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Soybean(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

SS-S 40 Priaxor 53 13.9 438SS-S 40 UTC 53 13.8 440SS-S 80 Priaxor 49 13.9 405SS-S 80 UTC 54 14.1 440SS-S 120 Priaxor 51 13.7 422SS-S 120 UTC 51 13.8 423SS-S 160 Priaxor 59 13.7 489SS-S 160 UTC 60 13.8 492SS-S 200 Priaxor 53 13.7 436SS-S 200 UTC 54 13.6 448

Mean 69 13.9 566Probability(%)Rotation (R) 0.0 97.8 0.0Nitrogen (N) 0.0 25.5 0.0Fungicide (F) 11.6 81.8 11.7R x N 0.0 3.0 0.0R x F 24.3 67.9 24.3N x F 4.1 58.2 4.2R x N x F 8.4 78.3 8.8LSD(0.10)Rotation (R) 5 NS 41Nitrogen (N) 2 NS 13Fungicide (F) NS NS NSR x N 5 0.4 42R x F NS NS NSN x F 2 NS 18R x N x F 6 NS 51AGI*: Adjusted Gross Income.

97

Page 104: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 12 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Wheat. Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight $3.44/bu

lb N/A bu/A % lbs/bu $/A

CSW-W 56 15.2 57.9 199

CWS-W 58 15.3 55.9 203

CWSL-W 48 15.2 57.8 170

CWSL-W(s) 71 14.7 58.2 249

WW-W 38 15.3 53.1 134

0 59 15.2 56.7 207

40 54 15.2 56.0 191

80 50 15.2 56.8 176

120 51 15.1 57.2 180

160 54 15.2 56.3 191

200 57 15.3 56.6 201

Priaxor 53 15.1 56.7 185

UTC 56 15.2 56.5 197

CSW-W 0 63 15.1 57.9 223

CSW-W 40 64 15.2 57.3 224

CSW-W 80 45 15.3 58.4 157

CSW-W 120 59 15.0 58.0 207

CSW-W 160 46 15.4 58.1 160

CSW-W 200 63 15.5 57.9 220

CWS-W 0 62 15.3 56.8 218

CWS-W 40 59 15.3 54.4 206

CWS-W 80 61 15.1 55.5 213

CWS-W 120 45 15.6 57.3 158

CWS-W 160 58 15.0 55.7 204

CWS-W 200 63 15.8 55.6 221

CWSL-W 0 58 15.0 57.4 203

CWSL-W 40 45 15.3 57.8 158

CWSL-W 80 44 15.2 57.8 153

CWSL-W 120 45 15.3 58.7 157

CWSL-W 160 51 15.4 56.8 179

CWSL-W 200 48 15.3 58.3 167

CWSL-W(s) 0 77 14.8 58.4 273

CWSL-W(s) 40 69 14.7 58.0 243

CWSL-W(s) 80 62 14.8 58.7 219

continue

98

Page 105: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 12 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Wheat.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight $3.44/bu

lb N/A bu/A % lbs/bu $/A

CWSL-W(s) 120 70 14.6 58.2 248CWSL-W(s) 160 74 14.8 58.4 261CWSL-W(s) 200 71 14.9 57.7 249

WW-W 0 33 15.7 52.8 116WW-W 40 35 15.4 52.7 122WW-W 80 38 15.4 53.5 135WW-W 120 37 14.9 53.5 131WW-W 160 43 15.3 52.6 150WW-W 200 42 15.0 53.5 149

CSW-W Priaxor 55 15.1 58.1 194CSW-W UTC 58 15.3 57.7 203

CWS-W Priaxor 56 15.3 56.1 196CWS-W UTC 60 15.4 55.7 211

CWSL-W Priaxor 47 15.1 57.7 164CWSL-W UTC 50 15.3 57.9 175

CWSL-W(s) Priaxor 70 14.7 58.3 246CWSL-W(s) UTC 71 14.8 58.1 251

WW-W Priaxor 36 15.3 53.1 126WW-W UTC 40 15.3 53.2 142

0 Priaxor 59 15.2 56.6 2080 UTC 58 15.2 56.7 205

40 Priaxor 53 15.2 56.4 18640 UTC 55 15.2 55.7 19580 Priaxor 48 15.1 56.9 16780 UTC 52 15.2 56.6 184

120 Priaxor 49 15.1 57.2 171120 UTC 54 15.1 57.1 189160 Priaxor 51 15.0 56.2 179160 UTC 57 15.3 56.4 202200 Priaxor 57 15.1 56.6 199200 UTC 58 15.4 56.6 203

CSW-W 0 Priaxor 65 15.0 58.0 228CSW-W 0 UTC 62 15.1 57.8 219

CSW-W 40 Priaxor 64 15.1 57.6 225

CSW-W 40 UTC 63 15.3 57.0 223

CSW-W 80 Priaxor 47 15.0 58.5 166

CSW-W 80 UTC 42 15.5 58.2 149

CSW-W 120 Priaxor 52 15.0 58.3 184

CSW-W 120 UTC 66 15.0 57.8 231

continue

99

Page 106: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 12 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Wheat.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight $3.44/bu

lb N/A bu/A % lbs/bu $/A

CSW-W 160 Priaxor 46 15.1 58.3 163

CSW-W 160 UTC 45 15.6 57.8 158

CSW-W 200 Priaxor 57 15.5 58.0 199

CSW-W 200 UTC 69 15.4 57.8 241

CWS-W 0 Priaxor 60 15.4 56.7 212

CWS-W 0 UTC 64 15.3 56.9 223

CWS-W 40 Priaxor 60 15.4 55.0 212

CWS-W 40 UTC 57 15.1 53.9 199

CWS-W 80 Priaxor 53 15.3 56.2 186

CWS-W 80 UTC 68 14.9 54.8 240

CWS-W 120 Priaxor 41 15.7 57.1 142

CWS-W 120 UTC 49 15.4 57.4 174

CWS-W 160 Priaxor 50 14.8 55.8 175

CWS-W 160 UTC 66 15.1 55.5 233

CWS-W 200 Priaxor 70 15.3 55.7 246

CWS-W 200 UTC 56 16.4 55.4 196

CWSL-W 0 Priaxor 59 15.1 57.7 207

CWSL-W 0 UTC 57 14.9 57.1 199

CWSL-W 40 Priaxor 41 15.3 58.1 143

CWSL-W 40 UTC 49 15.3 57.5 173

CWSL-W 80 Priaxor 40 15.2 57.9 140

CWSL-W 80 UTC 47 15.2 57.7 166

CWSL-W 120 Priaxor 47 15.0 58.7 165

CWSL-W 120 UTC 43 15.6 58.8 150

CWSL-W 160 Priaxor 47 15.1 55.0 165

CWSL-W 160 UTC 55 15.7 58.5 192

CWSL-W 200 Priaxor 47 15.1 58.8 164

CWSL-W 200 UTC 49 15.4 57.8 170

CWSL-W(s) 0 Priaxor 81 14.7 57.7 284

CWSL-W(s) 0 UTC 74 14.9 59.0 261

CWSL-W(s) 40 Priaxor 66 14.8 58.5 234

CWSL-W(s) 40 UTC 72 14.7 57.4 253

CWSL-W(s) 80 Priaxor 62 14.9 58.6 220

CWSL-W(s) 80 UTC 62 14.8 58.7 219

continue

100

Page 107: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1609 - 12 . Corn, Soybean and Wheat Rotation -Wheat.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test AGI

Rotation Nitrogen Fungicide Yield Moisture weight $3.44/bu

lb N/A bu/A % lbs/bu $/A

CWSL-W(s) 120 Priaxor 66 14.6 58.5 234

CWSL-W(s) 120 UTC 74 14.6 57.9 262

CWSL-W(s) 160 Priaxor 70 14.8 59.2 248

CWSL-W(s) 160 UTC 78 14.8 57.5 274

CWSL-W(s) 200 Priaxor 73 14.8 57.2 257

CWSL-W(s) 200 UTC 68 15.0 58.2 240

WW-W 0 Priaxor 31 15.6 52.9 109

WW-W 0 UTC 35 15.8 52.8 124

WW-W 40 Priaxor 33 15.3 52.8 116

WW-W 40 UTC 36 15.5 52.6 128

WW-W 80 Priaxor 35 15.3 53.4 124

WW-W 80 UTC 42 15.6 53.6 146

WW-W 120 Priaxor 37 15.0 53.3 130

WW-W 120 UTC 37 14.9 53.7 132

WW-W 160 Priaxor 41 15.3 52.7 146

WW-W 160 UTC 44 15.4 52.5 153

WW-W 200 Priaxor 37 15.0 53.3 129

WW-W 200 UTC 48 15.0 53.7 169

Mean 54 15.2 56.6 191

Probability(%)

Rotation (R) 7.1 77.9 8.8 7.2

Nitrogen (N) 0.4 90.6 16.6 0.4

Fungicide (F) 2.4 24.6 56.3 2.5

R x N 0.0 32.6 72.2 0.0

R x F 95.8 97.7 85.7 95.6

N x F 69.1 87.8 91.7 69.5

R x N x F 15.2 93.8 95.1 14.4

LSD(0.10)

Rotation (R) 16 NS 3.5 57

Nitrogen (N) 4 NS NS 14

Fungicide (F) 2 NS NS 8

R x N 15 NS NS 51

R x F NS NS NS NS

N x F NS NS NS NS

R x N x F NS NS NS NS

AGI*: Adjusted Gross Income.

101

Page 108: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

3 6

, Jason Cavadini.Marshfield, WI

102

Page 109: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

3

103

Page 110: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

4

104

Page 111: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

5

105

Page 112: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

6

106

Page 113: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

7 1

107

Page 114: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

7

108

Page 115: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

7

109

Page 116: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

8

110

Page 117: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

19

111

Page 118: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

0

112

Page 119: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

1

113

Page 120: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter N/A N/A N/APost plant N/A N/A N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 75' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 5/16/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Hornet 4oz/AMedal II EC 24oz/A

Force3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/26/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34406

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/16/16 @ V6Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/21/16 @ VT

Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field: ARS 406

C-1610-1.

Manure: 10500 gal

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6123

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

Dairy

Notes:

Results: Table

1/6/16

Hybrid:

114

Page 121: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-01. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Arlington, WI - 2016.

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 10.8 57.5 6.7 20.4 37.2 82.5 53.1 34.2 3295 35925 34848 116

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 10.0 58.2 6.3 21.5 38.6 81.9 53.2 32.3 3187 31987 34659 117

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 10.4 57.6 6.3 20.1 37.4 82.9 54.4 33.6 3267 34106 33712 117

Mean 10.4 57.7 6.4 20.6 37.7 82.5 53.6 33.4 3250 34006 34406 116

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 70.4 97.0 18.6 72.6 83.3 81.4 37.0 79.2 76.9 71.3 58.6 97.7

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

115

Page 122: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Virgil Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.6 P (ppm) 21 K (ppm) 111OM (%) 1.4

Preplant 46-0-0 391 lbs N/AStarter 9-23-30 200 lbs/A 5 /6 /16Post plant N/A N/A N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 75' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 5/6/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 3 qt/A Force3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/14/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34595

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/15/16 @ V6Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/19/16 @ VT

Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field:

C-1610-2.

Manure: N/A

Location: Fond du Lac, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Fond Du Lac

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6125

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Results: Table

N/A

Hybrid:

116

Page 123: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-02. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Fond Du Lac, WI - 2016

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 10.0 53.3 5.9 17.9 34.7 85.7 58.8 37.6 3537 35474 34659 102

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 10.2 53.1 6.0 18.9 36.2 84.7 58.0 35.1 3421 34877 34659 104

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 9.3 55.1 5.4 19.3 37.0 84.8 59.0 34.7 3401 31744 34469 101

Mean 9.9 53.8 5.8 18.7 36.0 85.1 58.6 35.8 3453 34032 34595 102

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 2.0 18.3 6.0 27.5 12.6 45.0 62.7 13.6 18.0 4.8 97.3 9.5

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) 0.4 NS 0.4 NS NS NS NS NS NS 2405 NS 3

117

Page 124: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Downs Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 65 K (ppm) 124OM (%) 4.6

Preplant 32-0-0 30 gal N/AStarter 9-23-30 200 lbs/A 4 /27/16Post plant N/A N/A N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 75' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 4/27/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Harness 3.0 oz/ACallisto 3.0 oz/A

Force3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/8/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33459

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/14/16 @ V6Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/14/16 @ VT

Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field:

C-1610-3.

Manure: N/A

Location: Galesville, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Trempealeau

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6126

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Results: Table

N/A

Hybrid:

118

Page 125: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-03. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Galesville, WI - 2016.

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 11.0 60.8 6.5 20.4 36.7 83.1 54.0 34.8 3337 36781 33333 113

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 10.5 61.2 6.5 21.0 37.8 82.3 53.0 33.0 3231 34130 32765 114

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 11.5 60.7 6.6 18.9 35.4 85.0 57.6 35.8 3446 39756 34280 116

Mean 11.0 60.9 6.5 20.1 36.6 83.4 54.9 34.5 3338 36889 33459 114

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 18.3 92.3 29.5 23.6 24.0 6.4 1.1 16.0 6.1 9.8 71.8 18.5

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) NS NS NS NS NS 1.8 2.0 NS 137 4125 NS NS

119

Page 126: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.3 P (ppm) 45 K (ppm) 85OM (%) 3.0

Preplant 32-0-0 30 gal N/AStarter 9-23-30 200 lbs/A 5 /5 /16Post plant N/A N/A N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 75' Experiment Size: 0.25A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Parallel 1.7 pt/AHornet WDG 3.0 oz/ARoundup Power Max 32 oz/A

Force3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/20/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 31123

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/09/16 @ V4Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/22/16 @ VT

Date: 10/21/11

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field:

C-1610-4.

Manure: N/A

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Wood

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6127

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Results: Table

N/A

Hybrid:

120

Page 127: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-04. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 8.1 56.6 6.0 18.1 35.6 85.0 58.2 36.6 3503 28314 30113 90

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 8.2 60.8 6.5 19.9 37.6 83.9 57.1 33.8 3392 27978 32197 90

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 8.4 58.8 6.4 18.4 35.6 85.2 58.5 35.3 3444 29060 31060 91

Mean 8.2 58.8 6.3 18.8 36.3 84.7 58.0 35.2 3446 28451 31123 91

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 89.5 1.5 44.7 42.5 47.4 59.6 70.3 36.7 66.2 94.1 40.0 70.2

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) NS 1.9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

121

Page 128: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Dodgeville Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 52 K (ppm) 153OM (%) 4.2

Preplant 46-0-0 250 lbs/A N/AStarter 9-23-30 200 lbs/A 5 /5 /16Post plant 32-0-0 20 gal N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 20' x 75' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 1.75 qt/A Force3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/12/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 30427

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/13/16 @ V6Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/15/16 @ VT

Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field:

C-1610-5.

Manure: N/A

Location: Montfort, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Grant

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6124

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Results: Table

N/A

Hybrid:

122

Page 129: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-05. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Montfort, WI - 2016.

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 11.0 59.9 6.9 18.3 35.2 85.1 57.6 33.2 3274 35949 33712 109

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 10.8 60.4 6.4 18.9 36.0 84.6 57.4 33.3 3269 35433 34090 112

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 11.5 59.6 6.7 18.1 34.6 85.1 57.1 34.3 3310 38156 34280 113

Mean 11.1 59.9 6.7 18.4 35.3 85.0 57.4 33.6 3284 36513 34027 111

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 5.9 65.1 10.7 57.7 53.3 78.2 88.5 56.4 63.4 7.9 77.5 6.0

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 1992 NS 3

123

Page 130: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Kewaunee Clay LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 7.1 P (ppm) 206 K (ppm) 104OM (%) 2.8

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter 9-23-30 200 lbs/A 5 /9 /16Post plant 28-0-0 30 gal N/A

Fall Chisel Turbo till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 5' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 5/9/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Steadfast 1.0 oz/AKeystone 1.5 pt/ACallisto 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.25 lb/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 9/15/16 Harvest Method: New Holland 707 Plot Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 29987

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Fortix was applied @ 0.5 oz/A on 6/15/16 @ V6Zolera was applied @ 5.0 oz/A on 7/19/16 @ VT

Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A on V53)Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A on VT

Field:

C-1610-6.

Manure: 9000 gal

Location: Valders, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Manitowoc

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides

Experiment: 10Pest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6128

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acreTreatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04 RIB

Analysis Rate Date

Dairy

Notes:

Results: Table

N/A

Hybrid:

124

Page 131: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1610-06. Corn Silage yield and quality response to fungicides Valders, WI - 2016.

Whole Plant

Dry Matter Crude In Vitro Milk per Plant PlantFungicide Yield Moisture protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population height

tons/A % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A in

UTC 8.2 51.6 5.8 18.3 36.1 84.8 57.9 35.1 3395 27666 31060 94

Fortix @ 0.5 oz/A @ V5 7.7 53.9 5.9 18.8 36.7 84.8 58.5 35.1 3441 26403 29545 96

Zolera FX @ 5.0 oz/A @ VT 8.4 54.4 6.1 17.9 35.3 85.7 59.5 35.7 3464 29093 29356 95

Mean 8.1 53.3 5.9 18.3 36.0 85.1 58.6 35.3 3433 27721 29987 95

Probability(%)

Fungicide (F) 49.9 61.8 58.8 75.1 74.8 48.3 28.2 95.0 80.4 39.3 42.2 57.7

LSD(0.10)

Fungicide (F) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

125

Page 132: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Starter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /3 /16

Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Chisel Plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.05 A

Planting Date: 5/3/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Hornet 5 oz/AMedal II EC 24 oz/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/10/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 35085

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

XiteBio applied at 250ml/A on 6/16/16 @ V7Return value for treated plots = Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) - application cost ($10.00/A) - product cost ($10.00/A).

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field: ARS 408

Results: Table 1611-01.

Manure: Manure 1050 gal

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, K. D. Kohn, T. H. Diallo

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH, XiteBio

Title: Corn response to XiteBio plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Experiment: 11Biologicals Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6130

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) XiteBio

126

Page 133: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1611-01. Corn Grain Yield Response to XiteBio.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGITreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUntreated Check 35606 268 23.7 53 0 0 0 815XiteBio @ 250ml/A 34564 273 23.3 54 1 0 1 833

Mean 35085 270 23.5 53 0 0 0 824Probability(%)Treatment (T) 38.2 42.8 32.6 31.6 65.9 100 65.9 41.5LSD(0.10)Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

127

Page 134: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Virgil Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.6 P (ppm) 21 K (ppm) 111OM (%) 2.9

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 391 Date: N/A

Starter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /6 /16

Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Chisel Plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.05 A

Planting Date: 5/6/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Acuron 3.0 qt/A Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/11/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33901

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

XiteBio applied at 250ml/A on 6/15/16 @ V6Return value for treated plots = Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) - application cost ($10.00/A) - product cost ($10.00/A).

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1611-02.

Manure: N/A

Location: Fond du Lac, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, K. D. Kohn, T. H. Diallo

County: Fond du Lac

Supported By: HATCH, XiteBio

Title: Corn response to XiteBio plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Experiment: 11Biologicals Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6131

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment:

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) XiteBio

128

Page 135: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1611-02. Corn Grain Yield Response to XiteBio.Fond du Lac, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGITreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUntreated Check 33712 236 19.9 54 0 0 0 737XiteBio @ 250ml/A 34090 239 20.1 54 0 0 0 744

Mean 33901 237 20.0 54 0 0 0 741Probability(%)Treatment (T) 59.4 35.0 37.6 44.7 39.1 39.1 100 41.9LSD(0.10)Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

129

Page 136: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 114 K (ppm) 48OM (%) 3.9

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 435 Date: N/A

Starter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 4 /26/16

Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Chisel Plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.05 A

Planting Date: 4/26/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Accent Q 0.9 oz/ALumax 3.0 gal/A

Force 3G 4.4 lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/5/16 Harvest Method: Massey 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34801

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

XiteBio applied at 250ml/A on 6/17/16 @ V6Return value for treated plots = Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) - application cost ($10.00/A) - product cost ($10.00/A).

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1611-03.

Manure: N/A

Location: Janesville, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, K. D. Kohn, T. H. Diallo

County: Rock

Supported By: HATCH, XiteBio

Title: Corn response to XiteBio plant growth promoting rhizobacteria

Experiment: 11Biologicals Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6132

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment:

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) XiteBio

130

Page 137: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1611-03. Corn Grain Yield Response to XiteBio.Janesville, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged AGITreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUntreated Check 34564 255 23.3 55 0 0 0 780XiteBio @ 250ml/A 35037 263 23.2 55 1 1 0 803

Mean 34801 259 23.2 55 0 0 0 791Probability(%)Treatment (T) 19.4 15.3 87.8 61.2 18.2 18.2 100 16.3LSD(0.10)Treatment (T) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

131

Page 138: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter N/A N/A N/APost plant N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel, Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 1.9 A

Planting Date: 5/16/ 2016 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

Medal II EC 24 oz/A 5/23/16Hornet 4 oz/A 5/28/16

Force 4.4 lb/A

Harvest Date: 10/24/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33327

Design: RCB Replications: 6

Factors/Treatments:

1) UTC2) 3Bar strain

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/31/16Field: ARS 406

1611-04.

Manure: 10500 gal / A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn,

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to 3Bar Biologics microbes applied in-furrow

Experiment: 11Biologicals Year: 2016Trial ID: 6129

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Pioneer 0048 AMX

Analysis Rate Date

Dairy

Notes:

Hybrid:

Results: Table

01/06/16

132

Page 139: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1611-04. Corn Response to 3Bar Biologics microbes applied in Furrow- Corn.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test Harvest *AGIRotation Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

UTC 279 20.7 57.3 0 0 0 33327 865

3bar strain 282 20.9 59.3 0 0 0 33327 874

Mean 280 20.8 58.3 0 0 0 33327 870

Probability(%)Treatment (T) 57 36.3 6.8 100 100 100 100 62

LSD(0.10)Treatment (T) NS NS 1.7 NS NS NS NS NS

*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income.

Lodged

133

Page 140: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.6 P (ppm) 33 K (ppm) 179OM (%) 2.6

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter N/A N/A N/APost plant See factors See factors See factors

No-Till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 1.2 A

Planting Date: 5/16/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: RTK, JD1700

Roundup PMax 25 oz/A 4/18/16Medal II EC @ 24 oz/acre 5/23/16Hornet 4 oz/A 5/23/16

N/A

Harvest Date: 10/24/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP Combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 21' Harvest Plant Density: 30829

RCBReplications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

1) RR (Plant only at ARL)2) SS (Plant at all locations)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/30/16

Urea Agrotain1) 0 02) 100 03) 75 254) 50 505) 25 756) 0 100

1) 1302) 1603) 190

Field: ARS374

1612-01 & 1612-02

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH, WI Fertilizer Research Council, CSCAP

Title: Using SuperU for split-applications of N

Experiment: 12Fertilizer Year: 2016Trial ID: 6054

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid:N fertilizer (%)N rate (lb N/A):

Plot Management

1) RR: Pioneer P0157 AMX2) SS: Dekalb DKC50-82 GENSS

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Hybrid:

Results: Table

N/A

134

Page 141: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 01. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Arlington, 2016

Nitrogen SuperU:Urea Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGIRate Ratio yield moisture weight density $3.44 Stover Cob Grain Total Stover Cob Grainlb/A % bu/A % lb/bu plants/A $/A T/A T/A T/A T/A % % %

Dekalb DKC50-82 257 19.45 59.02 31435 865 4.03 0.71 5.92 10.66 4.52 2.06 7.25Pioneer P0157 AMX 252 19.51 57.41 30222 846 3.63 0.62 5.52 9.77 5.03 2.06 7.28

0 130 203 19.12 58.63 30596 684 3.24 0.55 4.54 8.33 3.76 2.06 5.620 160 209 19.28 57.80 29469 702 3.35 0.58 4.75 8.69 3.73 2.06 5.990 190 199 19.55 53.99 32411 669 3.44 0.60 4.70 8.74 3.43 2.06 5.22

130 0_100 262 19.48 58.59 30694 880 3.85 0.71 5.89 10.46 4.48 2.06 7.41130 100_0 254 19.61 58.22 29559 851 4.01 0.62 5.79 10.42 4.81 2.06 7.43130 25_75 264 19.08 59.32 30440 888 3.75 0.67 5.84 10.26 4.78 2.06 7.68130 50_50 274 19.62 58.54 31737 920 3.75 0.64 5.87 10.26 4.72 2.06 6.88130 75_25 256 19.50 56.64 29973 862 3.85 0.70 5.96 10.51 4.66 2.06 7.35160 0_100 262 19.71 57.97 31202 878 4.15 0.70 6.00 10.85 4.98 2.06 7.51160 100_0 256 19.28 58.36 31051 863 3.84 0.70 5.99 10.53 4.66 2.06 7.82160 25_75 271 19.75 59.36 31322 909 4.15 0.70 6.10 10.95 4.90 2.06 7.57160 50_50 267 19.23 58.02 31205 899 4.08 0.72 5.95 10.75 5.35 2.06 7.70160 75_25 268 19.65 58.84 31285 900 3.69 0.67 5.78 10.15 5.06 2.06 7.76190 0_100 274 19.42 58.31 30648 919 4.17 0.72 6.20 11.09 5.13 2.06 7.91190 100_0 273 19.82 59.22 30751 917 3.59 0.65 5.62 9.85 5.47 2.06 7.77190 25_75 258 19.82 58.26 31158 866 4.20 0.68 5.94 10.82 5.59 2.06 7.62190 50_50 270 19.21 58.80 31281 910 3.84 0.72 5.95 10.51 5.21 2.06 7.65190 75_25 264 19.51 59.01 30131 887 3.99 0.69 6.05 10.74 5.20 2.06 7.82

Dekalb DKC50-82 0 130 201 19.27 59.57 31737 675 2.98 0.52 4.22 7.72 3.24 2.06 5.06Dekalb DKC50-82 0 160 226 19.37 57.50 31218 760 3.80 0.69 5.59 10.08 3.62 2.06 6.47Dekalb DKC50-82 0 190 215 19.85 49.81 31944 722 3.54 0.62 5.00 9.17 3.22 2.06 5.70Dekalb DKC50-82 130 0_100 260 19.26 60.76 30492 875 4.21 0.79 6.03 11.03 3.86 2.06 7.20Dekalb DKC50-82 130 100_0 260 19.75 59.29 30181 873 4.34 0.58 5.99 10.91 4.44 2.06 7.54Dekalb DKC50-82 130 25_75 263 19.20 59.67 31011 886 3.92 0.71 5.93 10.55 4.67 2.06 7.47Dekalb DKC50-82 130 50_50 283 19.63 59.12 32774 950 3.77 0.67 6.01 10.46 4.39 2.06 6.79Dekalb DKC50-82 130 75_25 246 19.04 55.88 28936 829 3.40 0.67 5.45 9.52 4.03 2.06 6.92Dekalb DKC50-82 160 0_100 272 19.70 59.99 32120 913 4.47 0.83 6.70 12.00 4.83 2.06 7.90Dekalb DKC50-82 160 100_0 260 19.24 59.62 31366 875 4.06 0.72 6.04 10.82 4.79 2.06 7.80Dekalb DKC50-82 160 25_75 268 19.91 61.39 31322 898 4.15 0.74 6.20 11.09 4.28 2.06 7.47Dekalb DKC50-82 160 50_50 271 19.46 59.30 32229 912 4.82 0.79 6.37 11.98 5.56 2.06 8.08Dekalb DKC50-82 160 75_25 277 19.17 60.45 32147 933 3.87 0.74 6.07 10.68 4.79 2.06 7.57continue

Dry matter yield Crude Protein

135

Page 142: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 01. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.(continued) Arlington, 2016

Nitrogen SuperU:Urea Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGIRate Ratio yield moisture weight density $3.44 Stover Cob Grain Total Stover Cob Grainlb/A % bu/A % lb/bu plants/A $/A T/A T/A T/A T/A % % %

Dekalb DKC50-82 190 0_100 277 19.42 59.55 32981 931 4.68 0.82 6.70 12.20 4.83 2.06 7.80Dekalb DKC50-82 190 100_0 273 19.89 61.05 31944 914 3.94 0.68 5.92 10.55 5.32 2.06 7.94Dekalb DKC50-82 190 25_75 252 19.42 58.36 31514 848 4.16 0.70 5.87 10.72 5.11 2.06 7.29Dekalb DKC50-82 190 50_50 268 18.94 60.31 31529 905 4.04 0.79 6.24 11.07 5.13 2.06 7.52Dekalb DKC50-82 190 75_25 262 19.60 60.80 30392 879 4.39 0.75 6.20 11.35 5.17 2.06 7.90

Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 130 206 18.98 57.69 29455 694 3.50 0.59 4.85 8.94 4.29 2.06 6.18Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 160 191 19.19 58.11 27720 644 2.91 0.47 3.91 7.29 3.84 2.06 5.50Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 190 183 19.24 58.17 32877 615 3.34 0.57 4.40 8.31 3.64 2.06 4.73Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 0_100 264 19.71 56.41 30897 885 3.50 0.63 5.75 9.88 5.09 2.06 7.63Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 100_0 247 19.47 57.14 28936 830 3.69 0.66 5.60 9.94 5.19 2.06 7.31Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 25_75 264 18.96 58.96 29870 891 3.58 0.63 5.75 9.96 4.88 2.06 7.88Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 50_50 265 19.61 57.96 30699 890 3.72 0.61 5.72 10.06 5.06 2.06 6.98Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 75_25 267 19.96 57.40 31011 894 4.30 0.74 6.47 11.51 5.28 2.06 7.78Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 0_100 251 19.71 55.94 30285 844 3.82 0.58 5.30 9.70 5.12 2.06 7.12Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 100_0 253 19.31 57.10 30737 850 3.62 0.67 5.95 10.25 4.54 2.06 7.85Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 25_75 274 19.59 57.33 31322 920 4.16 0.65 6.00 10.81 5.51 2.06 7.68Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 50_50 263 19.00 56.74 30181 887 3.33 0.65 5.53 9.51 5.14 2.06 7.31Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 75_25 259 20.13 57.22 30422 868 3.52 0.60 5.50 9.62 5.32 2.06 7.94Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 0_100 270 19.43 57.08 28314 907 3.65 0.62 5.71 9.98 5.43 2.06 8.02Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 100_0 274 19.74 57.40 29559 920 3.24 0.61 5.32 9.16 5.62 2.06 7.60Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 25_75 264 20.22 58.16 30803 884 4.24 0.66 6.01 10.91 6.07 2.06 7.94Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 50_50 272 19.47 57.29 31033 915 3.64 0.64 5.66 9.94 5.30 2.06 7.79Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 75_25 266 19.42 57.22 29870 895 3.59 0.63 5.91 10.13 5.23 2.06 7.73

Mean Mean 255 19.48 58.22 30828 856 3.83 0.67 5.72 10.22 4.77 2.06 7.26Probability(%):Hybrid (H) 24.5 75.4 16.6 7.5 21.8 3.8 1.5 11.8 3.6 2.7 90.1 91.6N_Treatment (T) 0.0 43.1 72.6 44.4 0.0 5.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.2 0.0H x T 7.9 39.9 34.2 30.5 9.3 6.1 8.2 4.5 4.4 15.6 24.1 9.9LSD(0.10):Hybrid (H) NS NS NS 1065 NS 0.3 0.0 NS 0.6 0.3 NS 0.6N_Treatment (T) 14 NS NS NS 47 0.5 0.1 0.6 1.1 0.5 NS 0.6H x T 20 NS NS NS 66 0.7 0.1 0.8 1.5 NS NS 0.9*AGI: Adjusted Gross Income.

Dry matter yield Crude Protein

136

Page 143: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 02. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Arlington, 2016

Urea Nitrogen Grain Nitrogen NitrogenN SuperU Grain harvest recovery Internal Harvest Physiological use Agronomic Agronomic

Rate Ratio yield Stover Cob Grain Stover Cob Grain Total index efficiency efficiency Index efficiency efficiency efficiency efficiencylb/A % bu/A % % % lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/lb lb/A T/lb bu/lb

Dekalb DKC50-82 250 0.72 0.33 1.16 59.6 4.7 139 203 0.56 0.35 1.28 0.69 0.67 0.52 0.008 0.34Pioneer P0157 AMX 233 0.80 0.33 1.16 59.6 4.1 131 195 0.57 0.37 1.25 0.67 0.78 0.50 0.009 0.44

0 130 192 0.60 0.33 0.90 41.0 3.7 85 130 0.54 -- 1.59 0.65 -- -- -- --0 160 201 0.60 0.33 0.96 41.0 3.8 97 142 0.54 -- 1.53 0.66 -- -- -- --0 190 199 0.55 0.33 0.83 37.6 3.9 79 121 0.54 -- 1.66 0.65 -- -- -- --

130 0_100 249 0.72 0.33 1.19 55.3 4.7 140 201 0.57 0.42 1.26 0.70 0.73 0.54 0.010 0.45130 100_0 245 0.77 0.33 1.19 62.8 4.1 139 206 0.56 0.41 1.23 0.68 0.69 0.58 0.010 0.39130 25_75 247 0.76 0.33 1.23 57.9 4.4 143 206 0.57 0.45 1.21 0.70 0.84 0.58 0.010 0.46130 50_50 248 0.76 0.32 1.10 57.0 4.1 129 190 0.57 0.34 1.33 0.68 0.86 0.46 0.010 0.54130 75_25 252 0.75 0.33 1.18 58.2 4.6 141 204 0.57 0.43 1.26 0.69 0.75 0.57 0.011 0.41160 0_100 254 0.80 0.33 1.20 66.8 4.6 145 217 0.56 0.30 1.19 0.67 0.70 0.47 0.008 0.33160 100_0 253 0.75 0.33 1.25 58.1 4.6 150 212 0.57 0.33 1.21 0.71 0.61 0.44 0.008 0.30160 25_75 258 0.78 0.33 1.21 65.1 4.6 149 219 0.56 0.32 1.19 0.68 0.67 0.48 0.008 0.39160 50_50 251 0.86 0.33 1.23 71.5 4.7 147 223 0.56 0.31 1.16 0.67 0.75 0.51 0.007 0.37160 75_25 244 0.81 0.33 1.24 59.7 4.4 143 207 0.57 0.28 1.19 0.69 0.67 0.41 0.006 0.37190 0_100 262 0.82 0.33 1.27 69.3 4.7 158 232 0.56 0.41 1.15 0.69 0.73 0.58 0.008 0.39190 100_0 237 0.88 0.33 1.24 63.3 4.3 140 207 0.57 0.32 1.15 0.68 0.72 0.45 0.005 0.39190 25_75 251 0.89 0.33 1.22 76.7 4.5 145 226 0.55 0.35 1.14 0.65 0.65 0.55 0.007 0.31190 50_50 252 0.83 0.33 1.22 64.6 4.7 146 215 0.57 0.35 1.18 0.68 0.73 0.50 0.007 0.38190 75_25 256 0.83 0.33 1.25 67.2 4.6 151 223 0.57 0.38 1.16 0.68 0.73 0.54 0.007 0.34

Dekalb DKC50-82 0 130 178 0.52 0.33 0.81 31.1 3.4 70 104 0.54 -- 1.73 0.66 -- -- -- --Dekalb DKC50-82 0 160 236 0.58 0.32 1.03 44.2 4.5 118 167 0.55 -- 1.47 0.70 -- -- -- --Dekalb DKC50-82 0 190 211 0.52 0.33 0.91 36.5 4.1 93 133 0.55 -- 1.61 0.69 -- -- -- --Dekalb DKC50-82 130 0_100 255 0.62 0.33 1.15 52.3 5.2 139 196 0.55 0.53 1.30 0.71 0.76 0.71 0.014 0.46Dekalb DKC50-82 130 100_0 253 0.71 0.33 1.21 62.1 3.8 145 211 0.55 0.58 1.21 0.69 0.72 0.82 0.014 0.46Dekalb DKC50-82 130 25_75 251 0.75 0.33 1.20 59.1 4.7 142 206 0.56 0.55 1.23 0.69 0.72 0.78 0.013 0.48Dekalb DKC50-82 130 50_50 254 0.70 0.31 1.09 53.5 4.2 130 188 0.58 0.46 1.39 0.69 0.73 0.64 0.014 0.63Dekalb DKC50-82 130 75_25 230 0.65 0.33 1.11 43.7 4.4 121 169 0.57 0.39 1.37 0.71 0.78 0.50 0.009 0.35Dekalb DKC50-82 160 0_100 283 0.77 0.33 1.26 69.7 5.5 169 244 0.56 0.32 1.16 0.70 0.71 0.48 0.007 0.29Dekalb DKC50-82 160 100_0 255 0.77 0.33 1.25 64.2 4.7 150 219 0.56 0.20 1.19 0.70 0.38 0.33 0.003 0.21Dekalb DKC50-82 160 25_75 262 0.69 0.33 1.19 56.4 4.9 148 210 0.56 0.19 1.25 0.71 0.71 0.27 0.004 0.26Dekalb DKC50-82 160 50_50 269 0.89 0.33 1.29 86.6 5.2 164 256 0.53 0.28 1.06 0.65 0.54 0.55 0.005 0.28Dekalb DKC50-82 160 75_25 256 0.77 0.33 1.21 60.0 4.9 147 212 0.57 0.18 1.23 0.70 0.61 0.28 0.003 0.32continue

Nitrogen content Nirogen uptake

137

Page 144: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 02. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.(continued) Arlington, 2016

Urea Nitrogen Grain Nitrogen NitrogenN SuperU Grain harvest recovery Internal Harvest Physiological use Agronomic Agronomic

Rate Ratio yield Stover Cob Grain Stover Cob Grain Total index efficiency efficiency Index efficiency efficiency efficiency efficiencylb/A % bu/A % % % lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/lb lb/A T/lb bu/lb

Dekalb DKC50-82 190 0_100 283 0.77 0.33 1.25 75.0 5.4 167 248 0.55 0.39 1.16 0.69 0.70 0.60 0.009 0.33Dekalb DKC50-82 190 100_0 250 0.85 0.33 1.27 68.2 4.5 150 223 0.56 0.30 1.13 0.68 0.67 0.47 0.005 0.30Dekalb DKC50-82 190 25_75 248 0.82 0.33 1.17 69.9 4.6 137 211 0.55 0.23 1.21 0.66 0.63 0.41 0.005 0.20Dekalb DKC50-82 190 50_50 264 0.82 0.33 1.20 66.7 5.2 150 222 0.57 0.30 1.19 0.68 0.67 0.47 0.007 0.28Dekalb DKC50-82 190 75_25 262 0.83 0.33 1.26 73.3 5.0 157 235 0.55 0.34 1.12 0.67 0.66 0.54 0.006 0.25

Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 130 205 0.69 0.33 0.99 50.9 3.9 101 156 0.54 -- 1.46 0.65 -- -- -- --Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 160 165 0.61 0.33 0.88 37.8 3.1 76 117 0.53 -- 1.59 0.62 -- -- -- --Pioneer P0157 AMX 0 190 186 0.58 0.33 0.76 38.8 3.8 66 109 0.53 -- 1.71 0.61 -- -- -- --Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 0_100 243 0.81 0.33 1.22 58.3 4.2 142 205 0.58 0.32 1.22 0.70 0.71 0.38 0.007 0.44Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 100_0 237 0.83 0.33 1.17 63.4 4.3 133 201 0.57 0.25 1.25 0.67 0.66 0.35 0.006 0.32Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 25_75 243 0.78 0.33 1.26 56.6 4.1 145 206 0.58 0.34 1.19 0.71 0.96 0.39 0.007 0.45Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 50_50 242 0.81 0.33 1.12 60.5 4.0 128 193 0.57 0.21 1.27 0.67 1.00 0.29 0.007 0.45Pioneer P0157 AMX 130 75_25 274 0.85 0.33 1.25 72.7 4.9 161 239 0.56 0.46 1.15 0.67 0.72 0.64 0.012 0.47Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 0_100 224 0.82 0.33 1.14 64.0 3.8 121 189 0.55 0.28 1.22 0.65 0.69 0.45 0.009 0.37Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 100_0 251 0.73 0.33 1.26 51.9 4.4 149 205 0.58 0.46 1.23 0.73 0.84 0.55 0.013 0.38Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 25_75 253 0.88 0.33 1.23 73.8 4.3 150 228 0.55 0.46 1.13 0.65 0.63 0.69 0.013 0.52Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 50_50 234 0.82 0.32 1.17 56.3 4.2 131 191 0.58 0.34 1.26 0.69 0.96 0.46 0.010 0.45Pioneer P0157 AMX 160 75_25 232 0.85 0.33 1.27 59.4 4.0 139 202 0.57 0.39 1.15 0.69 0.74 0.53 0.010 0.42Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 0_100 241 0.87 0.33 1.28 63.6 4.1 148 216 0.57 0.43 1.13 0.68 0.77 0.56 0.007 0.46Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 100_0 225 0.90 0.33 1.22 58.4 4.0 129 192 0.58 0.33 1.17 0.67 0.77 0.44 0.005 0.48Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 25_75 254 0.97 0.33 1.27 83.4 4.3 153 241 0.55 0.46 1.07 0.64 0.67 0.70 0.009 0.43Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 50_50 239 0.85 0.33 1.25 62.5 4.2 142 209 0.58 0.40 1.17 0.69 0.80 0.52 0.007 0.47Pioneer P0157 AMX 190 75_25 250 0.84 0.33 1.24 61.1 4.2 146 211 0.58 0.42 1.20 0.69 0.81 0.54 0.008 0.44

Mean 242 0.76 0.33 1.16 59.6 4.4 135 199 0.56 0.36 1.27 0.68 0.72 0.51 0.008 0.39Probability(%):Hybrid (H) 11.8 2.7 34.5 91.6 98.2 1.6 38.0 39.0 44.6 61.0 52.8 31.1 4.8 59.7 52.5 0.7N_Treatment (T) 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 8.2 24.3 0.0 1.3 56.2 85.3 5.2 0.0H x T 4.5 15.6 2.5 9.9 3.2 7.8 1.0 1.3 22.3 0.0 11.4 2.2 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0LSD(0.10):Hybrid (H) NS 0.05 NS NS NS 0.3 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.08 NS NS 0.03N_Treatment (T) 24 0.08 0.00 0.09 12.1 0.6 18 29 NS NS 0.12 0.03 NS NS 0.003 0.07H x T 35 NS 0.01 0.14 17.2 0.8 27 41 NS 0.16 NS 0.04 0.23 0.25 0.005 0.09

Nitrogen content Nirogen uptake

138

Page 145: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plainfield SandPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.5 P (ppm) 121 K (ppm) 85OM (%) 0.8

Preplant 0-0-60 100 lb/A 4 /12/16Starter 10-20-20-4S-2Ca+micros 200 lb/A 4 /19/16

Post plant See factors See factors See factors

Disk 25'

Irrigation: Yes.

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.7

Planting Date: 4/19/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Case IH1225

Prowl 2 pt/A 4/27/16 N/A

Harvest Date: 10/07/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP Combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 21' Harvest Plant Density: 30729

RCBReplications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test:

Total Irrigation Amount: 12.5"

Date: 11/01/13

Urea Agrotain1) 0 02) 100 03) 75 254) 50 505) 25 756) 0 100

1) 1302) 1603) 190

Field: C 16

1612-03 & 1612-04

Manure: N/A

Location: Hancock, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Waushara

Supported By: HATCH, WI Fertilizer Research Council

Title: Using SuperU for split-applications of N

Experiment: 12Fertilizer Year: 2016Trial ID: 6133

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 32000 plants per acre

plants per acre

N fertilizer (%)N rate (lb N/A):

Plot Management

1) DKC46-36RIB GENSSRIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Hybrid:

Results: Table

N/A

139

Page 146: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 03. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Hancock, 2016

N SuperU:Urea Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGIRate Ratio yield moisture weight density $3.44 Stover Cob Grain Total Stover Cob Grainlb/A % bu/A % lb/bu plants/A $/A T/A T/A T/A T/A % % %

0 (130) 122 23.21 58.41 31114 399 4.34 0.33 3.29 7.96 2.62 2.06 4.950 (160) 127 22.73 55.15 30699 418 4.03 0.35 3.81 8.18 2.80 2.06 4.970 (190) 120 22.54 56.26 30077 396 4.55 0.38 3.82 8.74 3.38 2.06 5.12

130 0_100 262 21.68 56.36 30699 868 6.20 0.65 6.05 12.90 2.88 2.06 6.00130 100_0 244 21.49 54.40 30803 810 5.83 0.61 5.67 12.12 3.11 2.06 5.75130 25_75 244 21.83 54.88 29973 809 7.33 0.68 6.26 14.26 2.86 2.06 5.88130 50_50 238 21.54 54.45 31425 788 5.59 0.53 5.08 11.19 3.09 2.06 5.50130 75_25 236 21.51 54.60 30803 783 5.81 0.53 5.26 11.60 3.31 2.06 5.67160 0_100 250 21.53 53.55 31322 831 6.05 0.58 5.61 12.25 3.53 2.06 5.54160 100_0 236 21.59 55.48 30181 782 5.57 0.50 5.03 11.10 2.82 2.06 5.73160 25_75 240 22.35 56.13 30077 793 6.26 0.60 5.90 12.76 3.13 2.06 5.93160 50_50 244 21.76 54.75 30699 809 6.83 0.57 5.43 12.83 3.02 2.06 5.61160 75_25 237 22.12 54.49 29766 783 6.17 0.57 5.37 12.10 2.49 2.06 5.89190 0_100 265 22.03 56.00 31633 878 6.95 0.70 6.78 14.43 3.12 2.06 6.32190 100_0 250 22.29 56.78 29144 828 6.60 0.70 6.32 13.61 2.85 2.06 6.52190 25_75 271 21.79 55.17 31011 898 7.18 0.63 6.09 13.91 3.42 2.06 6.24190 50_50 269 21.66 54.44 31633 891 7.18 1.77 6.69 15.64 2.78 2.06 6.55190 75_25 250 21.26 54.18 32048 831 7.14 0.65 5.97 13.76 3.24 2.06 6.15

Mean 228 21.94 55.30 30728 755 6.09 0.63 5.47 12.19 3.02 2.06 5.80Probability(%)N_Treatment (T) 0.0 0.2 12.3 24.7 0.0 3.7 11.2 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.9 0.0LSD(0.10)N_Treatment (T) 21 0.71 NS NS 70 1.71 NS 0.90 2.42 NS NS 0.62ϮAGI: Adjusted Gross Income.

Dry matter yield Crude Protein

140

Page 147: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 04. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Hancock, 2016

Urea Nitrogen Grain Nitrogen NitrogenN SuperU Grain harvest recovery Internal Harvest Physiological use Agronomic Agronomic

Rate Ratio yield Stover Cob Grain Stover Cob Grain Total index efficiency efficiency Index efficiency efficiency efficiency efficiencylb/A % bu/A % % % lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/lb lb/A T/lb bu/lb

0 (130) 139 0.42 0.33 0.79 36.52 2.18 52.2 90.9 0.41 -- 1.541 0.577 -- -- -- --0 (160) 161 0.45 0.33 0.80 35.77 2.28 61.2 99.2 0.46 -- 1.607 0.604 -- -- -- --0 (190) 161 0.54 0.33 0.82 50.39 2.49 62.0 114.9 0.43 -- 1.431 0.548 -- -- -- --

130 0_100 256 0.46 0.33 0.96 57.31 4.32 116.4 178.1 0.47 0.494 1.443 0.653 0.737 0.671 0.021 1.079130 100_0 240 0.50 0.33 0.92 58.43 4.04 104.2 166.7 0.47 0.400 1.453 0.632 0.721 0.583 0.018 0.941130 25_75 265 0.46 0.33 0.94 68.04 4.46 118.7 191.2 0.44 0.512 1.419 0.623 0.677 0.772 0.023 0.944130 50_50 215 0.49 0.33 0.88 55.44 3.48 89.8 148.7 0.45 0.289 1.459 0.606 0.694 0.445 0.014 0.892130 75_25 222 0.53 0.33 0.91 61.38 3.49 95.5 160.4 0.45 0.333 1.388 0.596 0.632 0.535 0.015 0.879160 0_100 237 0.56 0.33 0.89 77.12 3.83 99.8 180.8 0.50 0.242 1.487 0.617 -0.044 0.510 0.011 0.772160 100_0 213 0.45 0.33 0.92 50.70 3.30 93.7 147.7 0.45 0.203 1.449 0.628 0.768 0.303 0.008 0.680160 25_75 250 0.50 0.33 0.95 62.96 3.93 112.4 179.3 0.47 0.320 1.405 0.631 0.656 0.500 0.013 0.708160 50_50 230 0.48 0.32 0.90 64.83 3.64 98.2 166.6 0.43 0.231 1.396 0.592 0.566 0.421 0.010 0.734160 75_25 227 0.40 0.33 0.94 49.14 3.75 101.1 154.0 0.44 0.249 1.480 0.657 0.744 0.342 0.010 0.686190 0_100 286 0.50 0.33 1.01 71.93 4.64 137.0 213.6 0.47 0.395 1.362 0.652 0.818 0.519 0.016 0.765190 100_0 267 0.46 0.33 1.04 60.41 4.62 131.9 196.9 0.47 0.367 1.357 0.670 0.858 0.431 0.013 0.687190 25_75 258 0.55 0.33 1.00 79.07 4.15 123.4 206.7 0.44 0.323 1.281 0.597 0.685 0.483 0.012 0.794190 50_50 283 0.44 0.33 1.05 64.95 11.69 141.0 217.6 0.43 0.415 1.321 0.653 0.810 0.540 0.015 0.781190 75_25 253 0.52 0.33 0.98 75.59 4.27 120.1 200.0 0.44 0.306 1.323 0.605 0.771 0.448 0.011 0.683

Mean 231 0.48 0.33 0.93 60.00 4.14 103.3 167.4 0.45 0.339 1.422 0.619 0.673 0.500 0.014 0.802Probability(%)N_Treatment ( 0.0 59.4 47.4 0.0 37.9 11.1 0.0 0.0 91.2 6.8 84.0 74.8 15.0 64.0 0.1 0.0LSD(0.10)N_Treatment ( 38 NS NS 0.10 NS NS 25.4 46.4 NS 0.163 NS NS NS NS 0.005 0.133ϮAGI: Adjusted Gross Income.

Nitrogen content Nirogen uptake

141

Page 148: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybean

pH: 6.3 P (ppm) 37 K (ppm) 114OM (%) 3.0

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter 6-24-6-0.25

9-11-30, 6S, 1.3Zn5 gal/A150 lb/A

5/5/165/5/16

Post plant See factors See factors See factors

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.7

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: 6 row JD1700

Roundup 32 oz/A 5/13/16Parallel 1.7 pt/A 5/13/16Hornet WDG 3.0 oz/A 5/13/16

N/A

Harvest Date: 10/19/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP Combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 21' Harvest Plant Density: 33874

RCBReplications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/16/15

Urea Agrotain1) 0 02) 100 03) 75 254) 50 505) 25 756) 0 100

1) 1302) 1603) 190

Field: 790 - 4

1612-05 & 1612-06

Manure: N/A

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Wood

Supported By: HATCH, WI Fertilizer Research Council

Title: Using SuperU for split-applications of N

Experiment: 12Fertilizer Year: 2016Trial ID: 6134

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

N fertilizer (%)N rate (lb N/A):

Plot Management

1) Great Lakes 3847 VT2PRIB

Analysis Rate Date

N/A

Notes:

Hybrid:

Results: Table

N/A

142

Page 149: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 05. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Marshfield, 2016

N SuperU:Urea Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGIRate Ratio yield moisture weight density $3.44 Stover Cob Grain Total Stover Cob Grainlb/A % bu/A % lb/bu plants/A $/A T/A T/A T/A T/A % % %

0 (130) 225 20.40 56.42 32981 751 3.21 0.56 5.24 9.02 5.48 2.06 6.670 (160) 217 20.53 54.94 33396 725 3.17 0.50 5.03 8.70 4.67 2.06 6.430 (190) 221 20.49 54.30 33603 740 3.39 0.62 5.38 9.39 5.16 2.06 6.61

130 0_100 238 20.39 56.12 33811 796 3.17 1.87 5.53 10.58 5.89 2.06 7.12130 100_0 231 20.97 55.64 31114 770 3.55 0.59 5.60 9.74 5.51 2.06 7.81130 25_75 238 20.82 55.32 33085 792 2.86 0.59 5.28 8.72 5.76 2.06 7.40130 50_50 242 20.39 56.22 34433 809 3.60 0.66 5.95 10.21 5.76 2.06 7.51130 75_25 237 20.79 55.59 32774 792 3.01 0.52 4.80 8.33 5.44 2.06 6.65160 0_100 245 20.62 55.85 33396 816 3.61 0.69 5.93 10.23 4.89 2.06 7.94160 100_0 239 20.82 54.81 33811 795 3.54 0.65 5.75 9.93 5.15 2.06 7.45160 25_75 244 20.50 56.32 34329 814 3.15 0.70 5.46 9.31 4.93 2.06 7.60160 50_50 248 20.97 55.51 34952 826 3.06 0.60 5.45 9.12 5.87 2.06 7.22160 75_25 241 20.68 56.71 32981 804 3.37 0.61 5.56 9.54 5.32 2.06 7.94190 0_100 246 20.77 55.15 35470 819 3.73 0.69 6.18 10.60 5.44 2.06 7.43190 100_0 245 20.83 54.54 34744 818 3.51 0.63 5.57 9.70 5.82 2.06 7.43190 25_75 250 20.53 56.02 35367 835 3.23 0.64 5.69 9.57 5.58 2.06 7.48190 50_50 246 20.16 55.16 36404 824 3.83 0.66 6.06 10.55 5.27 2.06 7.96190 75_25 245 21.07 57.10 33085 814 3.26 0.64 5.56 9.46 5.94 2.06 7.68

Mean 239 20.65 55.65 33874 797 3.35 0.69 5.56 9.59 5.44 2.06 7.35Probability(%)N_Treatment (T) 5.6 88.1 31.9 36.7 6.0 88.2 45.9 40.7 67.9 30.5 53.4 2.5LSD(0.10)N_Treatment (T) 17 NS NS NS 56 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.80ϮAGI: Adjusted Gross Income.

Dry matter yield Crude Protein

143

Page 150: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1612 - 06. Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wisconsin soils.Marshfield, 2016

Urea Nitrogen Grain Nitrogen NitrogenN SuperU Grain harvest recovery Internal Harvest Physiological use Agronomic Agronomic

Rate Ratio yield Stover Cob Grain Stover Cob Grain Total index efficiency efficiency Index efficiency efficiency efficiency efficiencylb/A % bu/A % % % lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/A lb/lb lb/A T/lb bu/lb

0 (130) 222 0.88 0.33 1.07 56.10 3.72 111.0 170.8 0.58 -- 1.312 0.653 -- -- -- --0 (160) 212 0.75 0.33 1.03 46.82 3.32 107.4 157.6 0.58 -- 1.417 0.670 -- -- -- --0 (190) 227 0.83 0.33 1.06 56.05 4.08 115.5 175.6 0.57 -- 1.302 0.648 -- -- -- --

130 0_100 234 0.94 0.33 1.14 59.55 12.37 126.6 198.5 0.55 0.120 1.211 0.640 0.815 0.213 0.002 0.106130 100_0 237 0.88 0.33 1.25 60.47 3.90 141.3 205.7 0.58 0.233 1.154 0.681 0.805 0.268 0.003 0.050130 25_75 223 0.92 0.32 1.18 53.11 3.79 125.0 181.9 0.61 0.107 1.240 0.690 1.261 0.085 0.000 0.101130 50_50 251 0.92 0.33 1.20 67.43 4.36 144.1 215.9 0.59 0.255 1.195 0.676 0.341 0.347 0.005 0.134130 75_25 203 0.87 0.33 1.06 53.63 3.41 103.5 160.5 0.58 -0.058 1.305 0.647 0.221 -0.080 -0.003 0.099160 0_100 251 0.78 0.33 1.27 55.50 4.57 151.0 211.1 0.58 0.272 1.188 0.714 0.823 0.334 0.006 0.171160 100_0 243 0.82 0.33 1.19 58.13 4.26 137.2 199.6 0.58 0.186 1.227 0.688 0.702 0.262 0.005 0.134160 25_75 231 0.79 0.33 1.22 49.42 4.63 133.3 187.3 0.59 0.162 1.242 0.710 0.622 0.186 0.003 0.165160 50_50 230 0.94 0.33 1.16 57.36 3.97 126.2 187.5 0.60 0.117 1.235 0.672 0.383 0.187 0.003 0.193160 75_25 235 0.85 0.33 1.27 57.92 4.05 141.0 203.0 0.58 0.210 1.154 0.694 0.729 0.284 0.003 0.149190 0_100 261 0.87 0.33 1.19 65.03 4.58 146.9 216.5 0.58 0.166 1.211 0.679 0.815 0.216 0.004 0.128190 100_0 235 0.93 0.33 1.19 66.54 4.14 132.6 203.3 0.58 0.090 1.180 0.658 0.925 0.146 0.001 0.126190 25_75 241 0.89 0.33 1.20 58.13 4.24 136.5 198.9 0.60 0.111 1.225 0.688 0.460 0.123 0.002 0.151190 50_50 256 0.84 0.33 1.27 66.27 4.36 155.1 225.7 0.58 0.209 1.156 0.694 1.332 0.264 0.004 0.131190 75_25 235 0.95 0.33 1.23 61.93 4.24 136.9 203.0 0.59 0.113 1.162 0.673 1.056 0.144 0.001 0.123

Mean 235 0.87 0.33 1.18 58.30 4.56 131.7 194.6 0.58 0.153 1.229 0.676 0.753 0.199 0.002 0.131Probability(%)N_Treatment (T) 40.7 30.5 47.4 2.5 86.8 45.8 13.0 29.8 94.2 28.7 19.1 62.7 65.0 60.5 38.0 77.4LSD(0.10)N_Treatment (T) NS NS NS 0.13 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Nitrogen content Nirogen uptake

144

Page 151: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /3 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator Cultivated

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/3/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Medal II EC 24 oz/AHornet 4.0 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/10/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 35763

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/16/16 @ V6 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field: ARS406

Results: Table 1614-01

Manure: 10456 gal/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6136

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V6 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

145

Page 152: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-01. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 36363 272 23.7 56 0 0 0 828In-furrow 36616 270 23.9 55 0 0 0 823V6 Foliar 35606 268 24.8 55 0 0 0 811In-furrow + V6 Foliar 34469 256 23.7 55 0 0 0 779

Mean 35763 267 24.0 55 0 0 0 810Probability(%)Treatment 14.3 10.6 17.7 21.8 44.1 44.1 100 13.0

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

146

Page 153: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Sattre Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 5.9 P (ppm) 58 K (ppm) 73OM (%) 2.0

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 217 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /4 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Spring Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: Irrigated

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/4/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Acuron 3.0 qt/A Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/3/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33775

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/21/16 @ V8 growth stageIrrigation total: 3.0 inches

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-02

Manure: 10000 gal/A

Location: Chippewa Falls, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Chippewa

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6142

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V8 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

147

Page 154: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-02. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Chippewa Falls, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34722 180 22.4 50 0 0 0 554In-furrow 33712 196 21.1 51 0 0 0 607V8 Foliar 33080 178 21.2 53 2 1 1 551In-furrow + V8 Foliar 33585 184 22.2 51 2 0 1 567

Mean 33775 185 21.8 51 1 0 1 570Probability(%)Treatment 22.5 26.3 16.9 31.8 40.0 33.0 62.3 25.7

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

148

Page 155: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Oconto Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 7.6 P (ppm) 54 K (ppm) 202OM (%) 2.9

Preplant Analysis: 21-0-0-24S Rate lbs/A: 131 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /6 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/6/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Acuron 3.0 qt/A Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/13/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34090

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/23/16 @ V6 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-03

Manure: N/A

Location: Coleman, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Outagamie

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6146

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V6 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

149

Page 156: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-03. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Coleman, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34090 214 21.5 55 2 2 0 660In-furrow 33838 215 21.5 55 2 2 0 664V6 Foliar 33838 218 21.1 54 2 2 0 675In-furrow + V6 Foliar 34595 221 21.5 54 1 1 0 683

Mean 34090 217 21.4 54 2 2 0 671Probability(%)Treatment 80.2 81.3 82.8 80.6 89.1 89.1 100 80.3

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

150

Page 157: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Virgil Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybeans

pH: 6.6 P (ppm) 21 K (ppm) 111OM (%) 1.4

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 391 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /6 /16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/6/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Acuron 3.0 qt/A Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/11/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33649

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/15/16 @ V5 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-04

Manure: N/A

Location: Fond du Lac, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Fond du Lac

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6139

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V5 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

151

Page 158: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-04. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Fond du Lac, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 33585 246 20.8 53 0 0 0 765In-furrow 33459 238 19.8 54 0 0 0 743V5 Foliar 33333 247 20.0 54 1 1 0 771In-furrow + V5 Foliar 34217 241 20.0 54 1 1 0 751

Mean 33649 243 20.2 54 0 0 0 757Probability(%)Treatment 96.3 64.7 12.1 57.2 33.7 33.7 100 70.7

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

152

Page 159: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Downs Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybeans

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 65 K (ppm) 124OM (%) 4.6

Preplant Analysis: 21-0-0-24S Rate lbs/A: 100 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 4 /27/16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 4/27/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Harness 3.0 oz/ACallisto 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/3/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34027

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/14/16 @ V6 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-05

Manure: N/A

Location: Galesville, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Trempeleau

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6140

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) 1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V6 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

153

Page 160: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-05. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Galesville, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34469 231 20.5 55 2 2 0 717In-furrow 32575 233 20.5 55 2 2 0 724V6 Foliar 35101 241 20.7 55 1 1 0 749In-furrow + V6 Foliar 33964 231 20.7 55 0 0 0 718

Mean 34027 234 20.6 55 1 1 0 727Probability(%)Treatment 2.4 70.8 47.2 35.5 15.5 15.5 100 71.1

LSD(0.10)Treatment 1209 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

154

Page 161: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plainfield SandPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 6.9 P (ppm) 31 K (ppm) 65OM (%) 1.3

Preplant Analysis: 0-0-60 Rate lbs/A: 120 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 310 lbs/A Date: 4 /25/16Post plant Analysis: 21-0-0-24S Rate lbs/A: 65 lbs/A Date: N/A

Spring disk

Irrigation: Irrigated

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 4/25/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Prowl 2.0 pt/ALaudis 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/7/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34154

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/10/16 @ V5 growth stageIrrigation total: 11.8 inches

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-06

Manure: N/A

Location: Hancock, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Waushara

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6141

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC48-12RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V5 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

155

Page 162: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-06. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Hancock, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34469 230 22.1 54 0 0 0 709In-furrow 34217 216 21.2 54 0 0 0 669V5 Foliar 33712 228 21.6 54 0 0 0 703In-furrow + V5 Foliar 34217 219 21.4 54 0 0 0 676

Mean 34154 223 21.6 54 0 0 0 689Probability(%)Treatment 85.9 6.7 5.4 99.5 100 100 100 10.2

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS 10 1 NS NS NS NS NS

156

Page 163: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 6 P (ppm) 50 K (ppm) 138OM (%) 3.4

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 435 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 4 /26/16Post plant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/A

Spring Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 4/26/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Lumax 2.75 qt/Accent Q 0.9 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/5/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33964

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/20/16 @ V8 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-07

Manure: N/A

Location: Janesville, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Rock

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6137

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V8 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

157

Page 164: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-07. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Janesville, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34469 253 23.0 54 3 3 0 775In-furrow 33459 259 23.8 56 2 2 0 787V8 Foliar 34090 254 23.6 55 1 1 0 776In-furrow + V8 Foliar 33838 256 23.5 55 2 2 0 782

Mean 33964 256 23.5 55 2 2 0 780Probability(%)Treatment 90.5 93.8 54.6 14.3 92.1 92.1 100 96.5

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

158

Page 165: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Withee Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybeans

pH: 6.3 P (ppm) 37 K (ppm) 114OM (%) 3.0

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /5 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal/A Date: N/A

Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.7 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Roundup 32 oz/AParallel 1.7 pt/AHornet WDG 3.0 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/19/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34154

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/9/16 @ V4 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-08

Manure: N/A

Location: Marshfield, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Wood

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6143

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V4 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

159

Page 166: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-08. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Marshfield, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 35606 211 20.5 55 0 0 0 656In-furrow 34090 208 20.6 55 1 1 0 648V4 Foliar 33712 211 20.7 57 0 0 0 654In-furrow + V4 Foliar 33207 215 19.9 57 0 0 0 670

Mean 34154 211 20.4 56 0 0 0 657Probability(%)Treatment 4.7 55.8 60.2 24.1 22.7 22.7 100 45.4

LSD(0.10)Treatment 1328 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

160

Page 167: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Dodgeville Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybeans

pH: 5.8 P (ppm) 52 K (ppm) 153OM (%) 4.2

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 250 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200lbs/A Date: 5 /5 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 20 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Soil Finisher

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Acuron 1.75 pt/A Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/11/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34564

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/13/16 @ V5 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-09

Manure: N/A

Location: Montfort, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Iowa

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6138

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC56-03RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V5 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

161

Page 168: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-09. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Montfort, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 34595 267 21.2 56 0 0 0 825In-furrow 33712 254 21.5 57 0 0 0 786V5 Foliar 35479 257 21.4 57 0 0 0 795In-furrow + V5 Foliar 34469 255 21.7 57 0 0 0 788

Mean 34564 258 21.5 57 0 0 0 799Probability(%)Treatment 46.5 47.8 85.6 92.3 100 100 100 49.1

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

162

Page 169: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Onway Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Soybeans

pH: 6.5 P (ppm) 29 K (ppm) 149OM (%) 2.6

Preplant Analysis: 46-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 325 lbs/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200lbs/A Date: 5 /3 /16Post plant Analysis: 32-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 15 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/3/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Capreno 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.75 lb/ARoundup 32 oz/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/13/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 33207

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/10/16 @ V5 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-10

Manure: N/A

Location: Seymour, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Outagamie

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6144

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V5 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

163

Page 170: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-10. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Seymour, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 33712 204 18.4 55 0 0 0 644In-furrow 32954 209 18.6 57 0 0 0 658V5 Foliar 33207 204 18.8 56 0 0 0 643In-furrow + V5 Foliar 32954 199 18.0 55 1 1 0 630

Mean 33207 204 18.4 56 0 0 0 644Probability(%)Treatment 76.3 72.6 39.2 29.9 20.0 20.0 100 75.7

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

164

Page 171: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Kewaunee Clay LoamPrevious Crop: Corn

pH: 7.1 P (ppm) 206 K (ppm) 104OM (%) 2.8

Preplant Analysis: N/A Rate lbs/A: N/A Date: N/AStarter Analysis: 9-23-30 Rate lbs/A: 200 lbs/A Date: 5 /9 /16Post plant Analysis: 28-0-0 Rate lbs/A: 30 gal/A Date: N/A

Chisel plow Turbo-Till

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.07 A

Planting Date: 5/9/16 Row Width 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Plot Planter

Steadfast 1.0 oz/AKeystone 1.5 pt/ACallisto 3.0 oz/AAtrazine 0.25 lb/A

Force 3G @ 4.4lbs/A

Harvest Date: 10/19/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 34059

Design: RCD Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

Foliar application made on 6/15/16 @ V6 growth stage

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/01/16Field:

Results: Table 1614-11

Manure: 10000 gal/A

Location: Valders, WI

Personnel: J.G. Lauer, K.D. Kohn, T.H. Diallo

County: Manitowoc

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to Ascend™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016

Trial ID: 6145

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Treatment

Plot Management

Dekalb DKC38-04RIBHybrid:

Notes:

1) UTC2) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A3) V6 Foliar @ 8 oz/A4) In-furrow @ 6 oz/A + Foliar @ 6 oz/A

165

Page 172: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-11. Corn Response to Ascend plant growth regulator.Valders, WI - 2016.

Harvest Grain Grain Test Lodged ReturnTreatment density yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44

plants/A bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/AUTC 33712 219 20.3 57 0 0 0 683In-furrow 34595 226 20.0 55 0 0 0 706V6 Foliar 33459 214 19.8 56 1 0 0 668In-furrow + V6 Foliar 34469 226 20.6 56 0 0 0 703

Mean 34059 221 20.2 56 0 0 0 690Probability(%)Treatment 33.2 36.5 4.0 71.5 45.3 59.5 59.5 41.3

LSD(0.10)Treatment NS NS 0 NS NS NS NS NS

166

Page 173: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH: 6.2 P (ppm) 26 K (ppm) 79OM (%) 3.3

Preplant N/A N/A N/AStarter N/A N/A N/APost plant N/A N/A N/A

Disk Chisel Field Cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' X 25' Experiment Size: 0.5 A

Planting Date: 5/16/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: Almaco Precision Planter

Medal II EC 24 oz/A 5/23/16Hornet 4 oz/A 5/28/16

Force 4.4 lb/A

Harvest Date: 09/26/16 Harvest Method: NH 707 Chopper

Harvest Plot Size: 2.5' x 23' Harvest Plant Density: 36000

Design: RCB Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

1) Mycogen F2F6272) Dekalb DKC58-06RIB

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 10/31/16

1)UTC2)RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A3)WBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A4)RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A5)VBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A

Field: ARS406

1614-01

Manure: 10500 gal

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn,

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Corn response to RyzUp™ plant growth regulator

Experiment: 14PGR Year: 2016Trial ID: 6135

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 33000 plants per acre

plants per acre

Hybrid Treatment

Plot Management

1) Mycogen F2F6272) Dekalb DKC58-06RIB

Analysis Rate Date

Dairy

Notes:

Hybrid:

Results: Table

01/06/16

167

Page 174: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1614-12. Corn response to RyzUp Plant Growth Regulator - Silage Arlington, WI - 2016.

Dry Matter Kernel Crude In Vitro PlantHybrid Treatment Yield Moisture milk protein ADF NDF Digest NDFD Starch Ton Acre population

tons/A % % % % % % % % lbs/T lbs/T plants/A

Mycogen F2F627 9.7 64.5 3.6 6.9 21.3 39.8 85.3 63.0 28.4 3239 31577 37386Dekalb DKC58-06RIB 11.8 59.9 4.6 6.7 17.5 33.9 84.8 55.2 35.1 3305 39026 36103

UTC 10.0 62.9 3.8 6.9 19.2 36.4 85.5 59.8 32.1 3304 33074 37109RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A 10.8 61.7 3.5 6.7 19.0 36.4 85.3 59.2 32.4 3304 35797 37714WBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A 11.4 61.5 7.3 6.8 19.2 36.6 85.1 59.0 31.9 3273 37595 35606RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 10.4 62.3 3.8 6.7 19.6 37.2 84.8 58.8 31.5 3264 34181 35321VBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 11.1 62.6 2.1 6.8 19.9 37.5 84.6 58.5 30.8 3215 35860 37973

Mycogen F2F627 UTC 9.3 64.1 2.8 7.1 20.3 38.4 86.4 64.4 29.8 3328 30970 38068Mycogen F2F627 RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A 9.7 64.9 0.8 6.9 20.4 38.6 86.0 63.7 29.7 3300 31955 37689Mycogen F2F627 WBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A 10.0 63.8 10.0 6.9 21.8 40.3 84.6 61.7 27.6 3174 31718 36363Mycogen F2F627 RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 9.5 64.8 3.0 6.8 21.7 40.6 85.1 63.4 27.4 3199 30682 35795Mycogen F2F627 VBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 10.2 65.0 1.5 6.8 22.2 41.0 84.3 61.6 27.6 3196 32560 39015

Dekalb DKC58-06RIB UTC 10.7 61.7 4.8 6.8 18.0 34.5 84.6 55.2 34.3 3280 35177 36150Dekalb DKC58-06RIB RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A 12.0 58.5 6.3 6.6 17.6 34.2 84.5 54.7 35.2 3309 39638 37739Dekalb DKC58-06RIB WBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A 12.9 59.3 4.5 6.7 16.7 33.0 85.5 56.3 36.2 3373 43472 34848Dekalb DKC58-06RIB RyzUp @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 11.3 59.8 4.5 6.7 17.5 33.8 84.5 54.2 35.7 3329 37681 34848Dekalb DKC58-06RIB VBC-30396 @ 0.5 oz/A + Smart Trio @ 1 qt/A 12.1 60.2 2.8 6.8 17.6 33.9 84.9 55.5 34.0 3235 39161 36931

Mean 10.8 62.2 4.1 6.8 19.4 36.8 85.0 59.1 31.8 3272 35301 36745Probability(%)Hybrid (H) 2.2 0.5 55.1 5.8 0.3 0.2 31.4 0.1 0.4 23 2 24Treatment (T) 8.1 61.8 25.4 38.3 66.1 73.4 57.7 57.3 78.5 69 31 23H x T 67.9 42.1 21.1 51.1 21.6 26.6 10.4 7.1 49.5 42 54 94LSD(0.10)Hybrid (H) 1.1 1.5 NS NS 1.0 1.5 NS 1.2 2.0 NS 3852 NSTreatment (T) 0.9 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSH x T NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2.0 NS NS NS NS

Whole PlantMilk per

168

Page 175: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Previous Crop: Soybean

pH 6 P (ppm) 23 K (ppm) 130OM (%) 2.8

Preplant : N/A N/A

Date:

N/A

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : 28-0-0 150 6 /1 /16

Disk chisel/Ripper + Field cultivator

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.2 A

Planting Date: 5/5/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700, RTK

Hornet 4.0 oz/A 5/23/16Medal II EC 24 oz/A 5/23/16

N/A

Harvest Date: 10/24/16 Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 21'

Design: RCB Complete Factorial Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

1) Snaplage (shank, husk, cob, grain)2) Earlage (cob, grain)3) Dry grain (grain)

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /16

Field: ARS373

Results: Table 1615 - 01

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Snaplage, Earlage and Dry Grain Yield and Quality.

Experiment: 15Harvest Year: 2016Trial ID: 6155

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: 35000 plants per acre

Plant Part

Plot Management

Pioneer P0175 AMXHybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A N/A

169

Page 176: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table 1615-01. Snaplage, Earlage and Dry Grain Yield and QualityArlington, WI 2016Ear part Grain Test Lodged Harvest AGI

Ear Parts percent Yield CP ADF NDF NDFD Starch Lignin Fat P Ca K Mg Ash Yield Moisture weight Total Stalk Root plants $3.44/bu

% T/A % % % % % % % % % % % bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

Snaplage (Shank,Husk,Cob,Grain) 100.0 5.9 6.2 6.1 17.0 73.3 75.5 0.9 3.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.05 1.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- 30000 --

Earlage (Cob,Grain) 88.5 5.6 7.0 4.9 14.4 75.1 72.5 1.0 3.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.04 2.2 -- -- -- -- -- -- 32250 --

DryGrain (Grain) 80.7 4.8 7.4 2.1 10.3 81.6 78.1 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.05 1.8 194 19.9 59.8 1.3 1.0 0.3 30250 604

Mean 89.8 5.4 6.9 4.4 13.9 76.7 75.4 0.8 3.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.05 2.0 194 19.9 59.8 1.3 1.0 0.3 30833 604

Probability (%)

Ear Part (EP) 0.5 1.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 4.0 9.7 0.8 91.5 60.2 13.9 10.0 4.3 32.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 28.8 --

LSD (0.10)

Ear Part (EP) 7.1 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.5 5.0 4.2 0.18 NS NS NS NS 0.01 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

170

Page 177: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Alfalfa

pH 6.5 P (ppm) 74 K (ppm) 252OM (%) 3.8

Preplant : N/A N/A N/A

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : N/A

Rate lbs/A:

N/A

Date:

N/A

Disk chisel/Ripper + Field cultivator

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 25' Experiment Size: 0.48 A

Planting Date: 5/16/16 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700, RTK

Hornet 4.0 oz/A 5/06/16Medal II EC 24 oz/A 5/06/16

N/A

Harvest Date: 10/24/16

Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 21'

Design: RCB Complete Factorial Replications: 3

Factors/Treatments:

1) UTC 2) V2 3) V4 4) V6 5) V8 6) V10 7) V12 8) V14 9) V1610) V18 or VT11) R112) R213) R314) R415) R516) R6

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /16

Field: ARS 406

Results: Table 1616-01

Manure: 10500 gal

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Influence of Thinning Timing on Corn Grain Yield

Experiment: 16Thin Year: 2016Trial ID: 6147

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Growth Stage at Time of Thinning:

Plot Management

Pioneer P0175 AMXHybrid:

Analysis:

Dairy liquid N/A

171

Page 178: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1616-01. Influence of Thinning on Corn Grain Yield.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Thin Grain Grain Test AGI* Harvest

time yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root $3.44/b density rows/ear per row per ear mass

bu/A % lb/bu % % % $/A plants/A no. no. no. mg

UTC 270 20.4 60.2 1.8 0.9 0.9 841 60293 15.7 27.1 424 270

V2 259 20.8 59.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 802 31944 15.7 35.9 562 307

V4 251 20.1 58.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 782 30423 15.9 35.3 561 320

V6 260 19.9 58.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 811 33050 15.9 36.9 585 332

V8 251 20.9 58.9 0.4 0.0 0.4 778 32635 15.1 36.1 545 316

V10 247 20.5 57.6 1.3 0.4 0.9 768 30976 15.7 36.8 579 320

V12 178 20.7 58.9 35.7 1.0 34.8 551 30008 15.3 34.7 532 359

V14 221 21.1 58.1 1.3 0.0 1.3 684 32359 16.0 29.9 478 334

V16 177 20.4 57.9 14.7 1.8 12.9 551 30838 15.7 28.6 450 316

VT 189 20.4 57.5 3.7 1.4 2.3 587 29731 15.7 31.4 494 327

R1 180 20.5 58.2 8.1 0.5 7.6 560 29731 15.5 31.5 487 314

R2 187 20.5 58.3 11.6 1.4 10.2 581 31253 15.1 31.5 474 297

R3 159 20.0 57.4 7.8 0.9 6.9 496 31944 15.7 25.1 396 311

R4 143 20.8 60.3 10.7 1.4 9.3 444 30423 15.3 23.9 365 291

R5 147 20.8 60.8 26.8 0.9 25.9 456 31114 15.3 24.0 366 283

R6 118 20.4 59.6 24.0 3.7 20.3 368 29040 15.5 26.3 406 315

Mean 202 20.5 58.7 9.3 0.9 8.4 629 32860 15.6 30.9 481 313

Probability(%)

Treatment 0.0 42.9 9.1 2.5 28.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 88.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

LSD (0.10)

Treatment 19 NS 1.9 17.4 NS 16.5 58 1864 NS 3.0 51 25

*AGI - Average Gross Income

Grain Yield Components

Lodging ---------- Kernel ----------

172

Page 179: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: Corn / Soybean

pH 5.8 P (ppm) 9 K (ppm) 112OM (%) 3.2

Preplant : 0-0-60 125 lb/A 4 /19/16

Starter : 9-23-310-0-62

160 lb/A140 lb/A

4/22/164/22/16

Post plant :28-0-0

Rate lbs/A:

CC: 190CS: 160

Date:

6/8/166/8/16

See Factors

Irrigation: NO

Plot Size Seeded: 10' x 50' Experiment Size: 3.6 A

Planting Date: C: 5/18/16S: 5/17/16

Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: C: 1.5"

S: 1"Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

C: Radar LV 16 oz/A 4/29/16 Durango DMA 22 oz/A 4/29/16 Medal II EC 24 oz/A 4/29/16 Durango DMA 25 oz/A oz/A 6/22/16S: Durango DMA 22 oz/A 6/22/16 Cleanse 6 oz/A 6/22/16

Harvest Date: C: 10/21/16

S: 10/20/16

Harvest Method: C: MF 8XP plot combineS: Almaco plot combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 46'

Design: RCB Split-plot Replications: 4

Factors/Treatments:

1) CC2) CS

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /16

Field: 396

Results: Tables 1617-01 & 1617-02

Manure:N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D. Kohn

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title: Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Systems

Experiment: 17Tillage Year: 2016Trial ID: 6055

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Rotation

Plot Management

C: SS: Dekalb DKC50-82 S: RR: Syngenta NK Brand S20T6

Hybrid/Variety:

Analysis:

N/A

1) Rotational tillage: NT with fertilizer surface broadcast (2016)2) T1: Strip-Till with fertilizer banded. Soybean planted to 15-inch rows.3) T2: Strip-Till with fertilizer banded. Soybean planted to 30-inch rows.4) T3: Strip-Till with fertilizer surface broadcast. Soybean planted to 15-inchrows.5) T4: Strip-Till with fertilizer surface broadcast. Soybean planted to 30-inchrows.6) NT: Spring one 13-wave coulter with trash whippers on planter; with fertilizersurface broadcast

1) S1 - UTC2) S2 - 6 fl oz/a Priaxor in-furrow at planting

Tillage:

N/A

Fungicide:

Target Plant Density: C:35000 Plants/AcreS:140000 Plants/Acre

Notes:T2 and T3 were similar as well as T4 and T5 in 2016

173

Page 180: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1617- 01 .Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Systems - Corn Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged Harvest AGIRotation Tillage Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Root Stalk density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CC 216 21.8 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31396 665

SC 224 21.1 53.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 32521 693

NT 203 21.7 53.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 31125 627

RT 208 21.6 53.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 31625 642

T1 228 21.0 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32250 708

T2 231 21.2 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 32500 714

T3 227 21.4 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 32938 703

T4 221 21.5 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31313 682

Priaxor 221 21.5 54.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 31792 684

UTC 218 21.3 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 32125 675

CC NT 201 22.1 53.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 29375 618

CC RT 207 21.9 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 31375 637

CC T1 225 21.5 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 31750 695

CC T2 225 21.4 54.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 32250 697

CC T3 224 21.8 54.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 32625 690

CC T4 213 21.9 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 31000 656

SC NT 206 21.4 53.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 32875 636

SC RT 210 21.3 53.5 0.4 0.0 0.4 31875 648

SC T1 232 20.6 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32750 721

SC T2 236 20.9 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32750 732

SC T3 230 20.9 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 33250 715

SC T4 228 21.2 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31625 707

CC Priaxor 215 21.9 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31167 664

CC UTC 216 21.6 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31625 667

SC Priaxor 227 21.1 54.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 32417 704

SC UTC 220 21.0 53.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 32625 682

NT Priaxor 199 21.8 53.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 30750 613

NT UTC 207 21.7 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31500 640

RT Priaxor 213 21.6 53.6 0.4 0.0 0.4 32000 657

RT UTC 203 21.6 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31250 628

T1 Priaxor 230 21.1 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 33000 712

T1 UTC 227 21.0 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 31500 704

T2 Priaxor 233 21.2 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 31875 720

T2 UTC 229 21.1 54.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 33125 708

T3 Priaxor 232 21.5 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32500 719

T3 UTC 222 21.3 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 33375 687

T4 Priaxor 222 21.7 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 30625 684

T4 UTC 220 21.3 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 32000 679

continue

174

Page 181: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1617- 01 .Tillage in Corn and Soybean Production Systems - Corn(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Test Lodged Harvest AGIRotation Tillage Fungicide Yield Moisture weight Total Root Stalk density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lbs/bu % % % plants/A $/A

CC NT Priaxor 200 22.3 53.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29000 614

CC NT UTC 202 22.0 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 29750 622

CC RT Priaxor 206 21.9 53.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 31750 634

CC RT UTC 207 21.8 53.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 31000 640

CC T1 Priaxor 224 21.5 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33000 693

CC T1 UTC 226 21.4 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 30500 698

CC T2 Priaxor 227 21.6 54.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 31750 702

CC T2 UTC 223 21.3 55.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 32750 691

CC T3 Priaxor 224 22.0 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32000 690

CC T3 UTC 224 21.7 54.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 33250 691

CC T4 Priaxor 212 22.1 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 29500 652

CC T4 UTC 214 21.7 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 32500 660

SC NT Priaxor 198 21.4 53.2 1.5 1.5 0.0 32500 613

SC NT UTC 213 21.4 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 33250 659

SC RT Priaxor 220 21.3 53.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 32250 680

SC RT UTC 199 21.3 53.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 31500 617

SC T1 Priaxor 235 20.6 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 33000 730

SC T1 UTC 229 20.7 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 32500 711

SC T2 Priaxor 238 20.9 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 32000 738

SC T2 UTC 234 21.0 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 33500 725

SC T3 Priaxor 241 21.0 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33000 747

SC T3 UTC 220 20.9 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 33500 682

SC T4 Priaxor 231 21.3 54.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 31750 716

SC T4 UTC 226 21.0 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 31500 699

Mean 220 21.4 54.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 31958 679

Probability (%)

Rotation (R) 59.8 6.4 72.3 14.4 18.2 39.1 14.0 55.0

Tillage (T) 0.0 0.5 0.3 14.0 2.6 43.5 27.0 0.0

Fungicide (F) 29.4 5.3 59.3 5.7 9.2 32.4 31.7 33.2

R x T 87.0 84.9 57.3 14.0 2.6 43.5 48.4 87.2

R x F 22.3 13.8 60.8 5.7 9.2 32.4 70.6 20.9

T x F 55.7 83.3 53.5 13.5 2.3 43.2 8.3 55.4

R x T x F 57.7 98.0 93.4 13.5 2.3 43.2 34.9 59.8

LSD (0.10)

Rotation (R) NS 0.6 NS NS NS NS NS NS

Tillage (T) 9 0.3 0.6 NS 0.2 NS NS 28

Fungicide (F) NS 0 NS 0.2 0.1 NS NS NS

R x T NS NS NS NS 0.3 NS NS NS

R x F NS NS NS 0 0.2 NS NS NS

T x F NS NS NS NS 0.3 NS 1719 NS

R x T x F NS NS NS NS 0.4 NS NS NS*AGI - Adjusted Gross IncomeT2 and T3 were similar as well as T4 and T5 in 2016

175

Page 182: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table:1617- 02 .Tillage, Rotation and Planting Density in Corn and Soybean - Soybean Arlington, WI - 2016.

Tillage *AGItreatment Fungicide Yield Moisture $8.48/bu

bu/A % $/A

NT 72 13.9 589RT 59 13.7 488T1 72 13.8 597T2 68 13.9 563T3 73 13.9 597T4 68 13.8 559

Priaxor 70 13.8 577UTC 67 13.8 554

NT Priaxor 70 13.9 578NT UTC 73 13.9 600RT Priaxor 64 13.8 524RT UTC 55 13.7 452T1 Priaxor 77 13.8 631T1 UTC 68 13.8 563T2 Priaxor 68 13.8 557T2 UTC 69 14.0 569T3 Priaxor 74 13.9 605T3 UTC 72 13.9 589T4 Priaxor 69 13.7 568T4 UTC 67 13.9 550

Mean 69 13.8 566Probability(%)Tillage (T) 0.0 48.9 0.0

Fungicide (F) 2.7 45.2 2.7T x F 4.9 85.4 4.9LSD(0.10)Tillage (T) 4 NS 30

Fungicide (F) 2 NS 17T x F 5 NS 42*AGI - Adjusted Gross Income In 2016, for Reps 1 and 3, T1/T2 was applied to T3/T4; and T3/T4 to T1/T2.

176

Page 183: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: See factors

pH 5.8 P (ppm) 23 K (ppm) 200

Preplant : N/A N/A

Date:

4 /19/16

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : 28-0-0 See factors 6 /8 /16

CT & NT Soil Finisher

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: MP: 10' x 35' Experiment Size: 1.2

Planting Date: C: 5/18/16

Row Width: 35"

Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

Medal II EC @ 24 oz/a 4/29/16Durango DMA @ 22 oz/a 4/29/16Low vol 4 16 oz/a 4/29/16Durango DMA @ 22 oz/a 6/18/16

N/A

Harvest Date: C: 10/27/15

S: 10/19/15Harvest Method: C: MF 8XP Combine

S: Almaco combine

Harvest Plot Size: C & S : 5' x 31 Harvest Plant Density:

Design: FracRep: split-split-plot Replications: 1

Factors/Treatments:

1) No-Till 2) Conventional

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /14

1)- 160 lbs/A2) - 210 lbs/A

Field: ARS:336

Results: Table 1519-01

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel:

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title:

Experiment: Year: 2016

Multi-factor effects on continuous and rotated corn 19Systems Trial ID: 6056

J.G. Lauer, T. Diallo and K.D. Kohn

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Tillage: Nitrogen Rate:

Plot Management

1) RR: Pioneer P0175 AMX2) SS: Dekalb DKC50-82

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A

OM (%)

N/A

3.2

1) - UTC2) - Headline

Fungicide:

1) - CC2) - CS

Rotation: Plant Density: Genotype:

1-35000 Plants/A2-45000 Plants/A

1- Pioneer P0175 AMX (RR)2- Dekalb DKC50-82RIB (SS)

Notes:

See Factors

177

Page 184: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-01 . Multi-factor effects on continuous and rotated corn. Arlington, WI - 2016.

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGITillage Rotation Genotype Density rate Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

Headline 228 19.6 54.9 1.1 1.1 0.0 37558 714UTC 227 19.5 55.0 1.3 1.2 0.1 37265 712

160 227 19.3 55.2 0.9 0.9 0.0 37796 711160 Headline 227 19.4 55.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 37938 711160 UTC 227 19.2 55.3 1.1 1.1 0.0 37654 712

210 229 19.8 54.7 1.6 1.5 0.1 37027 715210 Headline 230 19.8 54.8 1.6 1.6 0.0 37178 718210 UTC 228 19.7 54.7 1.5 1.3 0.2 36875 712

35K 223 19.4 55.3 0.5 0.5 0.0 33171 69835K Headline 224 19.3 55.3 0.6 0.6 0.0 33500 70335K UTC 222 19.6 55.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 32842 69335K 160 223 19.2 55.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 33592 69835K 210 223 19.7 55.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 32750 698

45K 233 19.6 54.6 1.9 1.8 0.1 41652 72845K Headline 233 20.0 54.5 1.7 1.7 0.0 41616 72645K UTC 233 19.3 54.8 2.1 2.0 0.2 41688 73045K 160 231 19.4 55.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 42000 72445K 210 234 19.9 54.3 2.3 2.2 0.2 41303 732

P0175AMX(RR) 234 20.4 55.2 1.8 1.7 0.1 36202 727P0175AMX(RR) Headline 232 20.6 54.7 1.6 1.6 0.0 36500 721P0175AMX(RR) UTC 235 20.3 55.6 2.0 1.8 0.2 35904 732P0175AMX(RR) 160 232 20.4 55.6 1.0 1.0 0.0 36467 722P0175AMX(RR) 210 235 20.5 54.7 2.5 2.3 0.2 35938 731P0175AMX(RR) 35K 230 19.9 55.5 0.8 0.8 0.0 32592 718P0175AMX(RR) 45K 237 21.0 54.9 2.7 2.5 0.2 39813 736

DKC50-82(SS) 222 18.7 54.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 38620 699DKC50-82(SS) Headline 225 18.7 55.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 38616 707DKC50-82(SS) UTC 220 18.7 54.4 0.6 0.6 0.0 38625 691DKC50-82(SS) 160 222 18.3 54.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 39125 700DKC50-82(SS) 210 222 19.0 54.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 38116 699DKC50-82(SS) 35K 216 19.0 55.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 33750 679DKC50-82(SS) 45K 228 18.3 54.4 1.2 1.2 0.0 43491 720

CC 213 19.8 54.9 1.3 1.3 0.1 36796 667CC Headline 213 19.8 54.8 1.0 1.0 0.0 37250 667CC UTC 213 19.8 54.9 1.7 1.5 0.2 36342 666CC 160 212 19.5 54.6 0.7 0.7 0.0 37092 664CC 210 215 20.2 55.2 2.0 1.8 0.2 36500 669CC 35K 210 19.8 55.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 32717 656CC 45K 217 19.8 54.5 2.2 2.1 0.2 40875 677CC P0175AMX(RR) 218 20.7 55.3 2.0 1.9 0.2 35654 677CC DKC50-82(SS) 209 19.0 54.4 0.7 0.7 0.0 37938 656

continue

Lodged

178

Page 185: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-01 . Multi-factor effects on continuous and rotated corn.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGITillage Rotation Genotype Density rate Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

CS 242 19.3 55.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 38027 760

CS Headline 244 19.5 54.9 1.3 1.3 0.0 37866 762

CS UTC 241 19.1 55.1 0.9 0.9 0.0 38188 757

CS 160 242 19.2 55.7 1.1 1.1 0.0 38500 758

CS 210 243 19.3 54.3 1.1 1.1 0.0 37553 761

CS 35K 236 19.1 55.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 33625 740

CS 45K 249 19.4 54.8 1.6 1.6 0.0 42428 779

CS P0175AMX(RR) 249 20.2 55.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 36750 776

CS DKC50-82(SS) 236 18.3 55.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 39303 743

CT 238 19.2 55.1 1.5 1.5 0.0 37495 746

CT Headline 237 19.5 54.7 1.5 1.5 0.0 37398 741

CT UTC 239 18.8 55.4 1.5 1.5 0.0 37591 752

CT 160 240 19.0 55.2 1.4 1.4 0.0 37966 753

CT 210 236 19.4 55.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 37023 739

CT 35K 229 19.2 55.2 0.8 0.8 0.0 33278 718

CT 45K 247 19.1 54.9 2.1 2.1 0.0 41711 774

CT P0175AMX(RR) 241 20.2 55.6 2.0 2.0 0.0 36153 752

CT DKC50-82(SS) 235 18.2 54.5 0.9 0.9 0.0 38836 741

CT CC 227 19.4 54.9 1.5 1.5 0.0 37216 712

CT CS 249 19.0 55.2 1.4 1.4 0.0 37773 781

NT 218 19.9 54.8 1.0 0.9 0.1 37328 680

NT Headline 220 19.7 55.0 0.8 0.8 0.0 37717 688

NT UTC 215 20.1 54.6 1.1 1.0 0.1 36938 671

NT 160 214 19.6 55.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 37626 669

NT 210 222 20.1 54.5 1.6 1.4 0.2 37030 691

NT 35K 217 19.7 55.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 33063 678

NT 45K 219 20.1 54.3 1.7 1.6 0.2 41592 682

NT P0175AMX(RR) 226 20.7 54.7 1.5 1.3 0.1 36251 702

NT DKC50-82(SS) 210 19.1 54.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 38405 658

NT CC 200 20.3 54.8 1.2 1.0 0.1 36376 621

NT CS 236 19.5 54.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 38280 738

Mean 228 19.5 54.9 1.2 1.2 0.0 37411 713

continue

Lodged

179

Page 186: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-01 . Multi-factor effects on continuous and rotated corn.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016.

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest *AGITillage Rotation Genotype Density rate Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

Mean 227 19.5 54.9 1.2 1.2 0.0 37411 710Probability(%)Fungicide 73.2 53.5 72.4 74.6 87.2 30.1 61.7 79.1Genotype 0.1 0.0 25.7 1.9 3.0 30.1 0.0 1.3Genotype*Fungicide 24.9 55.4 6.7 57.2 70.5 24.5 61.0 21.9Genotype*NRate 71.2 24.2 23.9 9.4 13.3 29.5 68.6 61.7Genotype*PD 48.3 0.4 96.7 31.0 39.8 29.5 3.8 29.4NRate 59.1 14.3 28.7 13.5 19.4 22.9 19.3 71.3NRate*Fungicide 69.7 90.5 53.0 45.9 37.3 29.5 98.7 70.9PD 0.5 49.9 11.7 0.2 0.4 22.9 0.0 0.7PD*Fungicide 68.2 10.6 58.5 55.4 67.2 29.5 53.9 55.2PD*NRate 68.8 96.4 57.0 72.1 86.3 24.5 90.3 69.0Rotation 0.0 5.2 69.9 57.4 69.2 30.1 4.0 0.0Rotation*Fungicide 73.9 44.2 92.7 26.2 35.1 24.5 30.2 82.2Rotation*Genotype 52.7 75.9 28.8 50.4 63.0 24.5 82.0 59.5Rotation*NRate 79.2 28.9 1.1 18.8 25.3 29.5 76.5 88.5Rotation*PD 33.5 57.5 68.5 43.5 54.1 29.5 58.7 37.7Tillage 0.0 1.3 50.2 24.1 18.9 31.0 77.2 0.0Tillage*Fungicide 26.6 6.6 14.4 71.2 83.7 30.1 40.9 18.7Tillage*Genotype 15.3 49.2 9.6 95.0 82.4 30.1 65.2 12.8Tillage*NRate 9.3 74.8 62.2 16.5 23.4 22.9 76.8 9.9Tillage*PD 2.3 30.4 36.3 79.8 94.7 22.9 93.5 1.9Tillage*Rotation 3.1 46.2 62.9 66.9 79.2 30.1 25.4 2.9LSD(0.10)Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSGenotype 6 0.5 NS 0.7 0.8 NS 977 18Genotype*Fungicide NS NS 0.9 NS NS NS NS NSGenotype*NRate NS NS NS 1.1 NS NS NS NSGenotype*PD NS 0.7 NS NS NS NS 1387 NSNRate NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSNRate*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSPD 6 NS NS 0.7 0.8 NS 977 18PD*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSPD*NRate NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSRotation 6 0.5 NS NS NS NS 977 18Rotation*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSRotation*Genotype NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSRotation*NRate NS NS 0.9 NS NS NS NS NSRotation*PD NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage 6 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS 18Tillage*Fungicide NS 0.7 NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage*Genotype NS NS 0.9 NS NS NS NS NSTillage*NRate 8 NS NS NS NS NS NS 25Tillage*PD 8 NS NS NS NS NS NS 25Tillage*Rotation 8 NS NS NS NS NS NS 25*AGI: Adjusted Gross Income

Lodged

180

Page 187: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: See factors

pH 5.8 P (ppm) 23 K (ppm) 200

Preplant : 0-0-60 100 lb/A

Date:

4 /19/16

Starter : N/A N/A N/A

Post plant : 28-0-0 See factors 6 /8 /16

CT & NT Soil finisher

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: MP: 10' x 35' Experiment Size: 0.5 Ac

Planting Date: C: 5/18/16

Row Width: 35"

Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: JD1700 w RTK

Medal II EC @ 24 oz/a 4/29/16Durango DMA @ 22 oz/a 4/29/16Low vol 4 16 oz/a 4/29/16Durango DMA @ 22 oz/a 6/18/16

N/A

Harvest Date: 10/25/16Harvest Method: MF 8XP combine

Harvest Plot Size: 5' x 31 Harvest Plant Density:

Design: FracRep: split-split-plot Replications: 1

Factors/Treatments:

1) No-Till 2) Conventional

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Herbicide:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /16

1)- 160 lbs/A2) - 210 lbs/A

Field: ARS336

Results: Table 1519-02

Manure: N/A

Location:

Personnel:

County: Columbia

Supported By: HATCH

Title:

Experiment:

Multi-factor effects on continuous corn

19Systems

J.G. Lauer, T. Diallo and K.D. Kohn

Arlington, WI

Year: 2016Trial ID: 6058

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: See Factors

Tillage: Nitrogen Rate:

Plot Management

1) RR: Pioneer P0175 AMX2) SS: Dekalb DKC50-82

Hybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/A:

N/A

OM (%)

N/A

3.2

1) - UTC2) - Headline

Fungicide:

1) - UTC2) - Smart trio

Micro Nutrients: Plant Density: Genotype:

1-35000 Plants/A2-45000 Plants/A

1- Pioneer P0175 AMX (RR)2- Dekalb DKC50-82RIB (SS)

Notes:

See Factors

181

Page 188: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-02 . Multi-factor effects on continuous corn.Arlington, WI - 2016

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest AGITillage Genotype Density rate Micro Mix Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

Headline 214 19.4 54.4 0.5 0.5 0.0 37234 670UTC 211 19.2 54.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 36630 661

Smart Trio 212 19.4 53.9 1.0 1.0 0.0 37073 666Smart Trio Headline 214 19.4 54.1 0.7 0.7 0.0 36875 671Smart Trio UTC 211 19.3 53.7 1.3 1.3 0.0 37271 660

UTC 212 19.3 54.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 36792 665UTC Headline 214 19.5 54.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 37594 669UTC UTC 211 19.1 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 35990 662

160 211 19.3 54.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 36167 662160 Headline 210 19.5 54.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 36219 657160 UTC 212 19.0 54.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 36115 667160 Smart Trio 211 19.3 54.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 36875 662160 UTC 211 19.3 54.7 0.4 0.4 0.0 35458 662

210 214 19.4 53.8 0.6 0.6 0.0 37698 669210 Headline 218 19.3 54.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 38250 682210 UTC 210 19.5 53.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 37146 656210 Smart Trio 214 19.5 53.4 1.2 1.2 0.0 37271 669210 UTC 214 19.3 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 38125 669

35K 211 19.2 54.3 0.8 0.8 0.0 33479 66335K Headline 212 19.3 54.6 0.8 0.8 0.0 34094 66535K UTC 210 19.2 54.1 0.9 0.9 0.0 32865 66035K Smart Trio 209 19.1 54.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 33250 65535K UTC 214 19.4 54.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 33708 67135K 160 209 19.3 54.5 0.9 0.9 0.0 33083 65635K 210 213 19.2 54.1 0.7 0.7 0.0 33875 670

45K 213 19.4 54.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 40385 66945K Headline 215 19.5 54.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 40375 67445K UTC 211 19.3 53.9 0.5 0.5 0.0 40396 66345K Smart Trio 216 19.6 53.8 0.5 0.5 0.0 40896 67745K UTC 210 19.2 54.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 39875 66045K 160 213 19.2 54.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 39250 66845K 210 214 19.6 53.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 41521 669

P0175AMX(RR) 214 20.0 54.3 0.9 0.9 0.0 35604 668P0175AMX(RR) Headline 217 20.0 54.5 1.1 1.1 0.0 36344 676P0175AMX(RR) UTC 212 20.0 54.1 0.8 0.8 0.0 34865 661P0175AMX(RR) Smart Trio 209 20.3 53.7 1.8 1.8 0.0 35875 652P0175AMX(RR) UTC 219 19.8 54.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 35333 685P0175AMX(RR) 160 209 20.0 54.8 0.9 0.9 0.0 34208 653P0175AMX(RR) 210 219 20.0 53.8 1.0 1.0 0.0 37000 684P0175AMX(RR) 35K 214 19.7 54.5 1.3 1.3 0.0 32958 668P0175AMX(RR) 45K 215 20.4 54.1 0.6 0.6 0.0 38250 669

continue

Lodged

182

Page 189: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-02 . Multi-factor effects on continuous corn.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest AGITillage Genotype Density rate Micro Mix Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

DKC50-82(SS) 211 18.6 54.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 38260 663DKC50-82(SS) Headline 211 18.8 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 38125 664DKC50-82(SS) UTC 210 18.4 53.9 0.5 0.5 0.0 38396 662DKC50-82(SS) Smart Trio 216 18.5 54.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 38271 680DKC50-82(SS) UTC 205 18.7 54.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 38250 646DKC50-82(SS) 160 213 18.5 54.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 38125 671DKC50-82(SS) 210 208 18.7 53.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 38396 655DKC50-82(SS) 35K 209 18.8 54.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 34000 658DKC50-82(SS) 45K 212 18.4 54.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 42521 668

CT 226 19.0 54.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 37172 709CT Headline 229 19.0 54.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 37594 721CT UTC 222 19.0 54.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 36750 697CT Smart Trio 228 18.9 54.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 37375 718CT UTC 223 19.0 54.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 36969 700CT 160 225 18.9 54.9 0.3 0.3 0.0 36094 707CT 210 226 19.1 53.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 38250 710CT 35K 224 18.9 54.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 33719 702CT 45K 228 19.0 54.3 0.6 0.6 0.0 40625 715CT P0175AMX(RR) 226 19.6 54.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 35219 707CT DKC50-82(SS) 225 18.3 54.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 39125 710

NT 199 19.7 54.1 0.9 0.9 0.0 36693 623NT Headline 198 19.9 54.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 36875 619NT UTC 200 19.5 53.8 1.0 1.0 0.0 36510 626NT Smart Trio 196 19.8 53.6 1.7 1.7 0.0 36771 614NT UTC 202 19.5 54.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 36615 631NT 160 197 19.6 54.2 0.9 0.9 0.0 36240 617NT 210 201 19.7 54.0 0.9 0.9 0.0 37146 628NT 35K 199 19.5 54.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 33240 623NT 45K 199 19.8 53.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 40146 622NT P0175AMX(RR) 202 20.4 54.3 1.6 1.6 0.0 35990 629NT DKC50-82(SS) 196 18.9 53.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 37396 616

Mean 212 19.3 54.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 36932 666continue

Lodged

183

Page 190: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-02 . Multi-factor effects on continuous corn.(continued) Arlington, WI - 2016

Plant N Grain Grain Test Harvest AGITillage Genotype Density rate Micro Mix Fungicide yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root density $3.44/bu

plants/A lbs/A bu/A % lbs % % % plants/A $

Mean 212 19.3 54.2 0.6 0.6 0.0 36932 666Probability(%)Fungicide 58.7 48.6 37.6 74.2 74.2 -- 40.7 61.5Genotype 50.6 0.0 64.7 8.8 8.8 -- 0.2 75.9Genotype*Fungicide 74.5 46.7 96.4 30.5 30.5 -- 25.6 70.7Genotype*Micro 7.7 23.1 26.0 4.5 4.5 -- 73.1 6.7Genotype*NRate 19.5 61.1 60.7 85.1 85.1 -- 10.8 18.9Genotype*PD 91.3 6.5 87.3 54.5 54.5 -- 4.4 80.8Micro 97.9 75.4 20.4 5.3 5.3 -- 70.4 98.4Micro*Fungicide 92.7 59.4 83.4 22.2 22.2 -- 19.7 89.6NRate 64.0 65.8 9.8 94.9 94.9 -- 5.0 67.3NRate*Fungicide 36.3 22.0 98.5 49.5 49.5 -- 51.1 32.3NRate*Micro 98.8 73.3 60.1 25.4 25.4 -- 14.5 99.3PD 71.2 59.8 56.9 28.0 28.0 -- 0.0 74.0PD*Fungicide 84.7 92.1 77.7 91.2 91.2 -- 41.3 84.5PD*Micro 31.3 27.8 96.0 15.7 15.7 -- 33.4 35.2PD*NRate 76.6 42.4 42.8 63.5 63.5 -- 33.4 71.7Tillage 0.0 2.3 68.5 11.3 11.3 -- 50.9 0.0Tillage*Fungicide 41.9 45.3 67.8 72.1 72.1 -- 75.2 39.5Tillage*Genotype 63.8 72.5 57.3 10.2 10.2 -- 11.1 64.6Tillage*Micro 33.6 45.9 32.2 6.7 6.7 -- 86.9 31.8Tillage*NRate 82.6 82.2 25.5 99.4 99.4 -- 41.3 82.4Tillage*PD 67.6 77.8 64.9 1.6 1.6 -- 100.0 66.9LSD(0.10)Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSGenotype NS 0.5 NS NS 0.7 NS 1263 NSGenotype*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSGenotype*Micro 13 NS NS NS 0.9 NS NS 42Genotype*NRate NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSGenotype*PD NS 0.7 NS NS NS NS 1799 NSMicro NS NS NS NS 0.7 NS NS NSMicro*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSNRate NS NS NS NS NS NS 1263 NSNRate*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSNRate*Micro NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSPD NS NS NS NS NS NS 1263 NSPD*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSPD*Micro NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSPD*NRate NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage 9 0.5 NS NS NS NS NS 29Tillage*Fungicide NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage*Genotype NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage*Micro NS NS NS NS 0.9 NS NS NSTillage*NRate NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSTillage*PD NS NS NS NS 0.9 NS NS NS

Lodged

184

Page 191: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Plano Silt LoamPrevious Crop: SoybeanpH: 6.1 P (ppm) 23 K (ppm) 89OM (%) 2.8

Preplant : See factors N/ADate:

N/A

Starter : See factors N/A N/A

Post plant : See factors N/A N/A

Irrigation: None

Plot Size Seeded: 75' x 20' Experiment Size: 1.1 Acre

Planting Date: 05/13/15 Row Width: 30"Planting Depth: 1.5"

Planting Method: RTK, JD1700

None

Harvest Date: 10/17/16 Harvest Method: MF 8 XP Combine

Harvest Plot Size: 10' x 75' Harvest Plant Density: 32042

Design: RCB Factorial Replications: 4

Site Information

Tillage Operations:

Soil Type:

Fertilizer:

Experimental Design

Insecticide:

Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /14Field: ARS395

Manure: N/A

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Shawn Conely, John Gaska

County: Columbia

Supported By: BASF

Title: High Yield Systems for Corn and Soybean.

Experiment: 19Systems Year: 2016Trial ID: 6057

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Target Plant Density: plants per acre

plants per acre

Plot Management

Pioneer P0157 AMXHybrid:

Analysis: Rate lbs/

N/A

Continued.

Factor

Herbicide: Verdict 13 oz/A 5/23/16

N/A

185

Page 192: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Results:Table: 1619-03.

Location: Arlington, WI

Personnel: Joe Lauer, Thierno Diallo, Kent Kohn, Shawn Conely, John Gaska

County: Columbia

Supported By: BASF

Title: High Yield Systems for Corn and Soybean.

Experiment: 19Systems Year: 2016Trial ID: 6057

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY(Continued)

1) No Nitrogen CheckPlant Population (PD) 32,000 plants/ATriple Superphosphate 200lbs/A (Actual: 90 lbs P2O5) lbs/A PreplantPotash 200lbs/A (Actual: 120 lbs K2O) lbs/A Preplant

2) "Standard" ProgramPlant Population (PD) 32,000 plants/ALocal Standard N program (all preplant) University Rec. 200lbs/A PreplantDiammonium phosphate (DAP) 200lbs/A (Actual: 36 lbs N, 92 lbs P2O5) lbs/A PreplantPotash (K) 200 lbs/A Preplant

3) Plant Population (PD) 38,000 plants/A200 lbs/A Nitrogen with LimusDiammonium phosphate (DAP) 200 lbs/A PreplantPotash (K) 200 lbs/A Preplant

4) Plant Population (PD) 38,000 plants/A200 lbs/A Nitrogen with LimusMESZ (12-40-0-10S-1Zn) 200lbs/A (Actual: 24 lbs N, 80 lbs P2O5, 20 lbs S, 2 lbs Zn) lbs/A PreplantAspire (0-0-58-0.5B) 100-150lbs/A (Actual in 100 lbs: 58 lbs K2O5, 0.5 lbs B) lbs/A Preplant

5) Plant Population (PD) 38,000 plants/A200 lbs/A Nitrogen with LimusMESZ (12-40-0-10S-1Zn) 200lbs/A (Actual: 24 lbs N, 80 lbs P2O5, 20 lbs S, 2 lbs Zn) lbs/A PreplantAspire (0-0-58-0.5B) 100-150lbs/A (Actual in 100 lbs: 58 lbs K2O5, 0.5 lbs B) lbs/A PreplantPriaxor 4 oz/A V6-V8Headline AMP 10 oz/A VT/R1

6) Complete PackagePlant Population 38,000 plants/A200 lbs/A Nitrogen Program with LimusMESZ (12-40-0-10S-1Zn) 200 (Actual: 24 lbs N, 80 lbs P2O5, 20 lbs S, 2 lbs Zn) lbs/A PreplantAspire (0-0-58-0.5B) 100-150 (Actual in 100 lbs: 58 lbs K2O5, 0.5 lbs B) lbs/A PreplantHeadline 6 oz/A In-furrowPriaxor 4 oz/A V6-V8Librel Micronutrient V6-V8Bioforge V6-V8

Factors/Treatments:

Application Dates:Preplant Applications - May 18V6/V8 Applications - June 24VT/R1 Application - July 21

186

Page 193: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Table: 1619-03. High Yield Systems for Corn and Soybean.Arlington, WI - 2016.

Grain Grain Test Lodged V2 Nitrogen Harvest *AGITreatment (Population + N + P + K + Fungicides) yield moisture weight Total Stalk Root Vigor content density $3.44/bu

bu/A % lb/bu % % % 0-5 % plants/A $

1 32K + 0 N + 200 TSP + 200 K 156 22.4 53 0 0 0 2.8 1.0 28250 481

2 32K + 160 N + 200 DAP + 200 K 230 22.8 53 0 0 0 3.0 1.3 30000 706

3 38K + 160 N + 200 DAP + 200 K 239 23.1 53 0 0 0 3.0 1.3 33250 731

4 38K + 160 N Limus + 200 MESZ + 150 Aspire 246 23.1 53 1 1 0 3.0 1.3 33250 753

538K + 160 N Limus + 200 MESZ + 150 Aspire +Headline + Priaxor + Headline AMP

252 23.3 53 0 0 0 3.0 1.3 33500 769

638K + 160 N Limus + 200 MESZ + 150 Aspire + Headline +Priaxor +Headline AMP + B-Moly

261 23.2 53 1 1 0 3.0 1.4 34000 799

Mean 231 23.0 53 0 0 0 3.0 1.3 32042 706

Probability(%)

Treatment (T) 0.0 24.3 18.6 56.6 56.6 100 45.1 0.0 0.1 0.0

LSD(0.10)

Treatment (T) 15 NS NS NS NS NS NS 0.1 2197 44

*AGI: Adjusted Gross Income

187

Page 194: STUDIES ON CULTURAL PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS …corn.agronomy.wisc.edu/Research/Report/2016.pdf · Cooperating Farmers: Ken Congdon, Eric Faull, Mike Maass, Ed Montsma, and

Printing for Spine of Book

2016 Annual Research Report – Lauer, Kohn, and Diallo