Upload
ruth-patterson
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
GRADE 3 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 3
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
26.4% 24.2%30.5%
10.0%
36.5%
47.4%
19.6%29.4%
15.4%
20.2% 21.1%
5.6%
42.4% 44.0%
26.2% 26.3%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 31.1%2013-14: 31.8%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 42.6%2013-14: 42.4%
3
GRADE 4 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 4
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
42.7%
23.3% 27.9%18.8%
31.6%
40.7%
27.3%
32.0%
21.3% 19.4%
43.6%
15.2%
30.6%
54.3%
25.5% 30.9%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.3%2013-14: 33.2%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 39.5%2013-14: 42.2%
4
GRADE 5 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 5
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
27.6%
14.8%
26.5%
8.2%
24.1%
41.0%
20.3% 23.1%
28.2%
18.6%25.9%
8.2%
26.7%30.4%
10.3%
23.2%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.2%2013-14: 29.7%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 36.7%2013-14: 35.5%
5
GRADE 6 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 6
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.340.325
0.4330.368
20.5% 24.1% 24.5% 23.1%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 29.6%2013-14: 28.9%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 41.6%2013-14: 36.4%
6
GRADE 7 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 7
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.3
0.3520.372
0.343
20.8% 21.4% 22.8% 21.7%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 31.4%2013-14: 29.5%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 41.5%2013-14: 34.6%
7
GRADE 8 ELA PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
ELA – GRADE 8
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.370.417
0.34 0.37637.1% 36.8% 34.7% 36.1%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 33.7%2013-14: 35.5%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 46.7%2013-14: 41.7%
8
GRADE 3 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 3
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
26.4%20.6%
33.9%
16.0%
37.2%
42.3%
25.5% 30.7%
36.7%
25.5%
42.9%
17.3%
55.3%60.0%
41.0% 40.6%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 34.2%2013-14: 42.2%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 43.6%2013-14: 53.1%
9
GRADE 4 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 4
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
42.7%
30.1%
41.0%
10.4%
34.0%
57.4%
30.2%38.2%
27.9%31.9%
47.3%
21.3%
35.7%
67.9%
43.1% 40.1%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 36.3%2013-14: 42.6%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 47.5%2013-14: 52.1%
10
GRADE 5 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 5
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
26.7%18.2%
22.1%
8.2%15.7%
50.8%
10.9%
21.9%
46.5% 41.4%
31.0%22.5%
41.1%
64.3%
35.9%43.0%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 29.9%2013-14: 40.0%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 34.9%2013-14: 47.5%
11
GRADE 6 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 6
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.295 0.304
0.2230.27223.5%
30.0%24.5% 26.3%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 30.6%2013-14: 38.1%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 35.9%2013-14: 41.8%
12
GRADE 7 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 7
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.2350.277
0.256 0.255
34.3% 32.7% 31.7% 32.7%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 27.7%2013-14: 32.9%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 35.5%2013-14: 40.4%
13
GRADE 8 MATH PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
MATH – GRADE 8
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.28 0.315
0.2460.281
15.8%10.8%
4.2%10.0%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 27.4%2013-14: 22.2%
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 37.5%2013-14: 21.8%
14
GRADE 4 SCIENCE PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
SCIENCE – GRADE 4
Edison Franklin Hamilton Holmes Hoover Lindbergh Roosevelt District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%100.0%
93.1% 95.1%
83.7%
97.0% 97.2% 100.0%96.1%
84.4%
93.2% 96.3%
76.1%
93.1%93.9%
92.3% 90.3%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 90.0%2013-14: Not Available
ERIE 1 AVG2012-13: 95.7%2013-14: 94.1%
15
GRADE 8 SCIENCE PERFORMANCEPERCENT AT LEVELS 3 AND 4
SCIENCE – GRADE 8
Franklin MS
Hoover MS Kenmore MS
District Avg
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0.807 0.8340.813 0.818
64.4%
80.9%
65.3%70.3%
2012-13 2013-14
NYS AVERAGE2012-13: 73.0%2013-14: Not Available
ERIE 1 AVG.2012-13: 87.1%2013-14: 79.9 %
16
ELA REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
56% 54%48%
54%
40%
36%
64%
35%37%
36%
42%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 92%KW 89%ERIE 1 92%
% PASSING 13-14KE 64%KW 85%ERIE 1 92%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 47% 13-14 48%
17
ELA COMMON CORE
13-14 KE 13-14 KW 13-14 Dist0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
24% 27% 25%
34% 31%31%
24% 32%28%
% 85-100 % 74-84 % 65-73
% PASSING 13-14KE 82%KW 90%ERIE 1 84%
% MASTERY ERIE 113-14 32%
18
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA REGENTS
12-1
3 F
MS
13-1
4 F
MS
12-1
3...
13-1
4...
12-1
3...
13-1
4...
12-1
3 K
E
13-1
4 K
E
12-1
3 K
W
13-1
4 K
W
12-1
3 D
ist
13-1
4 D
ist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
67%70%
62%
47%
47%
18% 20%
2%9%
1%
26%18%
33%
30%38%
53% 53%
81%72%
61%
76%
52%
65%
58%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 92%KW 85%ERIE 1 91%
% PASSING 13-14KE 63%KW 53%ERIE 1 86%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 33% 13-14 25%
19
INTEGRATED ALGEBRA COMMON CORE
13-14 FMS 13-14 HMS 13-14 KMS 13-14 KE 13-14 KW 13-14 Dist0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
70%
34% 43%
16%
13%20%
30%
62%57%
69%63%
60%
4% 1% 1% 1%
% 85-100 % 74-84 % 65-73
% PASSING 13-14KE 86%KW 77%ERIE 1 85%
% MASTERY ERIE 113-14 7%
20
ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
21% 22%16% 16% 18% 18%
43%
56%
32%
48%36%
51%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 64%KW 48%ERIE 1 78%
% PASSING 13-14KE 78%KW 64%ERIE 1 80%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 40% 13-14 40%
21
GEOMETRY REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
25% 27%21%
14%23% 19%
66%55%
59%61%
62%59%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 91%KW 80%ERIE 1 87%
% PASSING 13-14KE 82%KW 75%ERIE 1 87%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 36% 13-14 40%
22
GLOBAL HISTORY REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
30%
43%38% 39% 35%
41%
52%35% 44% 39% 47% 37%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 82%KW 82%ERIE 1 87%
% PASSING 13-14KE 78%KW 78%ERIE 1 81%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 45% 13-14 44%
23
U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
70%
56%66%
55%
68%
55%
23%
35%
26%35%
25%
35%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 93%KW 92%ERIE 1 94%
% PASSING 13-14KE 91%KW 90%ERIE 1 93%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 68% 13-14 65%
24
LIVING ENVIRONMENT REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
36%46% 42% 39% 39% 41%
57%45%
47% 51% 51% 49%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 93%KW 89%ERIE 1 93%
% PASSING 13-14KE 91%KW 90%ERIE 1 92%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 51% 13-14 50%
25
EARTH SCIENCE REGENTS
12-1
3 F
MS
13-1
4 F
MS
12-1
3...
13-1
4...
12-1
3...
13-1
4...
12-1
3 K
E
13-1
4 K
E
12-1
3 K
W
13-1
4 K
W
12-1
3 D
ist
13-1
4 D
ist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
61%
73%
88%
60%
45%46%
21%
10%
21%
32% 31%
39%
27%
12%
40%
52% 52%
44%
52%
49%
44% 48%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 65%KW 70%ERIE 1 86%
% PASSING 13-14KE 62%KW 0%ERIE 1 86%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 45% 13-14 48%
26
CHEMISTRY REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
17% 16%10%
5%13% 10%
72%
60%
56%52%
63%
55%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 89%KW 66%ERIE 1 87%
% PASSING 13-14KE 76%KW 57%ERIE 1 82%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 25% 13-14 24%
27
PHYSICS REGENTS
12-13 KE 13-14 KE 12-13 KW 13-14 KW 12-13 Dist
13-14 Dist
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
14% 10% 12%
26%
13% 16%
53%
22%
53%
52%
53%33%
% 85-100 % 65-84
% PASSING 12-13KE 67%KW 65%ERIE 1 85%
% PASSING 13-14KE 32%KW 78%ERIE 1 84%
% MASTERY ERIE 112-13 37% 13-14 41%
28
NEXT STEPS
A Coordinated District eff ort will include:Alignment of School Instructional Improvement Plans
to District Goals/Strategic Intents and DTSDE RubricA viable curriculum that is aligned with State
standards and assessmentsA focus on the single greatest determinant of
learning…the classroom teacher’s instructionTargeted professional development Utilization of allotted planning time to review goals
and progress targets by grade level, course and/or department
Exploration of realigning resources for teaching & learning