14
Structural Analysis of Tie Back Retaining Wall Tie-Back Retaining Wall By Nick Crane Brett Morrow For CE 331, Spring 2007 Project 2

Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Structural Analysis of Tie Back Retaining WallTie-Back Retaining Wall

ByNick Crane Brett Morrow

ForCE 331, Spring 2007

Project 2

Page 2: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

The Tie-Back Retaining Wall is 885 Feet Long and Varies in Height from 5 – 40 Feet

ContractorWyatt Construction, LLC

Structural EngineerSchnabel Foundation Company

Location

OwnerUniversity of Alabama

LocationRidgecrest South Residential Community, University of Alabama

Page 3: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Beginning Nowg g

Page 4: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

The Tie-Back Retaining wall is C t t d f 114 12 53 H PilConstructed of 114 - 12x53 H-Piles

Page 5: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Driving PilesDriving Piles

Page 6: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

The Wall is Constructed from Top to Bottom, Temporary Lagging is Placed Between the e po a y agg g s aced et ee t e

H-Piles in Order to Hold Back the Soil

Page 7: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Drainageg

Page 8: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Tie-Back DetailThe Tie-Backs Anchor the Piles Which Creates a Force That Pulls

A i t th L i O i th L t l S il P d K iAgainst the Lagging Overcoming the Lateral Soil Pressure and Keeping the Soil in Place

Page 9: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Soil Boring at H-Pile Number 37

15°

Ti B k

Brownish-Red Clayey Sand with Gravel

Loose to Firm, Moist 21ft.

Tie-Back

Brownish-Red Silty Sand with Gravel

Firm, Moist 10 ft.Light Gray Fat Clay

Firm to Very Stiff, Moist 4 ft.

H-Pile

Page 10: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Calculations of Lateral Soil Pressure

Drained Shear

Active Lateral Soil Pressure

Specific Weight of

Vertical Soil

Horizontal Soil

Type of SoilStrength

(Φ)Coefficient

(Ka)Depth

(ft.)

gSoil (γ) (lb/ft^3)

Pressure (Pv) (psf)

Pressure (Ph) (psf)

Clayey Sand, Loose to Firm 28° 0.361 21 115 2415 871.815

Silty Sand & Gravel, Medium 32° 0.307 10 115 3565 1094.455

Homogeneous Inorganic Clay, Sandy or SiltySandy or Silty Clay, Medium

Stiff to Stiff 28° 0.361 4 115 4025 1453.025

Typical Calculations

)sin(1)sin(1

Φ+Φ−

=Ka

)28sin(1361 −

DepthPv *γ= PvKaPh *=

2415=(115pcf)*(21’) 872=( 361)*(2415))28sin(1)(361.

+= 2415=(115pcf) (21 ) 872=(.361) (2415)

Page 11: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

We Analyzed A Particular Beam (# 37) in th R t i i W llthe Retaining Wall

Free to Move

8.5 ft

#37

Roller Boundary Conditions Representing

35 ft#37Tiebacks16.5 ft

Fixed Boundary Condition

Page 12: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

RISA Analysis and Unity Checks for H-Pile

Mu (kft) = (1.6)(Max Moment (kft))

29.345 kft = (1.6)(18.34 kft)

Unity Check

MnMuφ kft

kft5.277

35.29=

Unity Check

= .1058kft < 1, OK

Distributed Load (lb/ft) Moment Diagram (lb-ft)

Page 13: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Analysis of Shotcrete On Face of Wallf CLRFD Method Used for Concrete Design

Max Moment From the Worst Case Earth Pressure Load: 9.22 K-ft

))(')(85(.))((bfcf

fyAsa =)"12)(3)(85(.

)60)(6(."176.12

ksiksiin

=

)12/1)](2

()[)()(9.0( adfyAsMn −=φ

"1761

Mn < ΦMn 9 22<11 91 OK

)12/1)](2

"176.1("5)[60)(6)(.9.0( 2 −= ksiinMnφ

9.22<11.91, OK

a = depth of stress block (in.)As = area of steel (in^2)fy = yield strength of steel (ksi)f’ i t th f t (k i)f’c = compressive strength of concrete (ksi)Bf = effective flange width (in.)d = distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of steel (in.)

Page 14: Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack ...richardson.eng.ua.edu/.../Past_Projects/Ridgecrest_Retaining_Wall.pdf · Structural Analysis of Tie-Back Retaining WallBack Retaining

Any Questions?