Upload
john-barney
View
81
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STRATEGICALLY CHANGING TO SUPPORT
Better Thinking +
Better Technology =
BETTER RESULTS
THE FUTURE OF MANUFACTURING • Technology • Best Part of Lean • Economical Structured Market • Time to Market (Days vs. Weeks)
TECHNO
LOG
Y
TECHNO
LOG
Y
Future of Manufacturing
Progressive with Overlapping & Divergent Paths
TechnologyCulture
CAPABLITY FOCUSBest Part of Lean
Economical Structured Market Market Variables
2
REASON FOR CHANGEHEALTH CARE SECTOR
MEDICAL DEVICE Evolution 2-3 year cycles with possible
Complete transformation
Economical & Social DriversMarket Pricing
INDUSTRIAL SECTORAEROSPACE & DEFENSE PRODUCTION
7-10 year cycle remaining with possible continuous transformation &
shorter technology cycles. Likely super downturn to follow this super
upturn
GLOBAL COMPETITION &OFFSETS & SUPPLIER RQMTS
US Defense Budget sequestration
ENERGYOIL DRILLING EQUIPMENT
Evolution. 10-12 year cycles with possible transformation in
50% of applications
Social & Enviro driving Alternative energy
STRATEGIC ELEMENTS & TRANSITIONS
FIXTURING TECHNOLOGY
PROCESSESAPPLICATIONS& DME -TOOLS
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS
FPY – OEE- UTILIZATION-ALL TOOLS
ENGINEERINGPROCESS MGMTFINANCIAL MGMT
CORE
SPECIFICALLY HOW THIS HAS BECOME OUR NORM
2012-15 Path - Drive a Focused & Continuous Improvement Culture
Demonstrated OS tool proficiency drives
improvement
ImproveProcesses
Develop Strategy
Track Results
Monitor Progress
Establish Vision
PrioritizeOpportunities
Voice of the Customer (VOC) Key Input to the
Operating System (OS)
Define Metrics
Create RoadmapCommunicate
Goals & Objectives
Qualifying Learning Coaching, Teaching & Baselining
Using the tools; getting results andBuilding foundations
Bronze
Silver
Gold
Significantly improving business metrics
Year-over-year business metricsimprovements
Qualifying Learning Coaching, Teaching & Baselining
Using the tools; getting results andBuilding foundations
Bronze
Silver
Gold
Significantly improving business metrics
Year-over-year business metricsimprovements
Achievement Levels for Cells/Sites/Programs
Guide to Next LevelVOS Qualifying Level
0
1
3
1
1
211
1
2
11
200
1
2
3
4
5VOC - Voic e of t he Cust ome r Surve y
FOD Comp lianc e
MOS Imple ment at ion
VOS Aca d emy Training
5S
Vis ua l F act ory
VSM Current/ Fut ure
QCP C Impl eme nt a tion
Skills Training Ma t rix
RCC A Training
St and a rd W ork Implement at io n
TPM - Tota l Pro d uct ive Ma int enanceProg ram
De mand P ull S ys t em
Emplo yee D evelop ment
Identify Business Opportunities
DriveExecution
KMI
Ops MeasuresFinancial MeasuresTrend Data
Crew Plan / JDS Wkly Summary/Review
Drive product focus
Day to Day Task
Lean Model
G/O Milestone
2007 Vought Site Control Tower
Achieved Goal Yellow-Within 10% Red- Missed Target > 10% Not Applicable
Metrics
Target/Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act
July '07 1 1 100% 0% 100%100% $3.86 $2.46 11 9 90%80.0% 90% 55.9%100% 100% 298 279 208 207 10.0%21.8%5.0% 8.8% 50.8%50% 5.4 7.78 $17.5 $19.664
Aug '07 1 1 100%100%100%100% $3.86 $6.34 11 11 90%76.7% 90% 51.7%100% 100% 298 278 208 208 10.0%20.6%5.0% 9.3% 50.8%49% 5.4 7.25 $17.5 $21.109
Sept '07 1 1 100% 67% 100%100% $3.86 $5.24 11 9 90%73.7% 90% 46.5%100% 100% 298 276 208 212 10.0%27.4%5.0%11.0%50.8%53% 5.4 6.89 $17.5 $22.211
Oct-7 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $2.67 11 8 90%72.6% 90% 45.7%100% 100% 298 277 208 217 10.0%27.7%5.0%11.8%50.8%52% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $20.145
Oct-14 1 1 100% 0% 100%100% $3.86 $2.62 11 7 90%79.3% 90% 42.3%100%94.7% 298 292 208 220 10.0%29.1%5.0%11.6%50.8%50% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $21.630
Oct-21 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $3.24 11 10 90%77.0% 90% 50.2%100%87.0% 298 297 208 227 10.0%25.4%5.0% 9.9% 50.8%48% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $22.248
Oct-28 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $3.47 11 9 90%81.7% 90% 52.1%100% 100% 298 297 208 235 10.0%24.7%5.0%12.3%50.8%50% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $22.712
% on TimeCA
R3 ($/Std hr)
Tot. Inventory (M)% Direct OT % Indirect OT
% Productivity
Non-Touch Headcount (Indirect)
Cost Working CapitalSchedule
Inventory TurnsFOB on Time
MTD Defects /1000 std hrs
Starts on Time
Completes on Time
Touch Headcount (Direct)
OSHARecordables
TimelinessReporting
Safety Quality
2007 Vought Site Control Tower
Achieved Goal Yellow-Within 10% Red- Missed Target > 10% Not Applicable
Metrics
Target/Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act
July '07 1 1 100% 0% 100%100% $3.86 $2.46 11 9 90%80.0% 90% 55.9%100% 100% 298 279 208 207 10.0%21.8%5.0% 8.8% 50.8%50% 5.4 7.78 $17.5 $19.664
Aug '07 1 1 100%100%100%100% $3.86 $6.34 11 11 90%76.7% 90% 51.7%100% 100% 298 278 208 208 10.0%20.6%5.0% 9.3% 50.8%49% 5.4 7.25 $17.5 $21.109
Sept '07 1 1 100% 67% 100%100% $3.86 $5.24 11 9 90%73.7% 90% 46.5%100% 100% 298 276 208 212 10.0%27.4%5.0%11.0%50.8%53% 5.4 6.89 $17.5 $22.211
Oct-7 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $2.67 11 8 90%72.6% 90% 45.7%100% 100% 298 277 208 217 10.0%27.7%5.0%11.8%50.8%52% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $20.145
Oct-14 1 1 100% 0% 100%100% $3.86 $2.62 11 7 90%79.3% 90% 42.3%100%94.7% 298 292 208 220 10.0%29.1%5.0%11.6%50.8%50% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $21.630
Oct-21 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $3.24 11 10 90%77.0% 90% 50.2%100%87.0% 298 297 208 227 10.0%25.4%5.0% 9.9% 50.8%48% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $22.248
Oct-28 1 0 100% 100% $3.86 $3.47 11 9 90%81.7% 90% 52.1%100% 100% 298 297 208 235 10.0%24.7%5.0%12.3%50.8%50% 5.4 N/A $17.5 $22.712
% on TimeCA
R3 ($/Std hr)
Tot. Inventory (M)% Direct OT % Indirect OT
% Productivity
Non-Touch Headcount (Indirect)
Cost Working CapitalSchedule
Inventory TurnsFOB on Time
MTD Defects /1000 std hrs
Starts on Time
Completes on Time
Touch Headcount (Direct)
OSHARecordables
TimelinessReporting
Safety Quality
STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT& FOCUS
OBJECTIVES TIED TO STRATEGIES
EMBEDDED ACTION ITEMS
ALL THINGSLINKED
KEEPING TRACK OF PROGRESS
INCENTIVE
Assess & Understand
Develop Preliminary
Business Plan•Performance Assessment
Vision2013
$9million-capable 35% EBITDA
Identify Objectives
•Market Opportunity•Product
Develop Strategies
•Market Forecast &Focus•Product
Develop Resource Plan
•Labor•Expense•Capital
Establish Performance Measures
Deploy Plans
• Short Term
Determine Priorities
Assess Plan Effectiveness
November 12
March
Timeline
Technical Partnership
2014-2015 Vision & Direction
CONSIDERATIONS & KEY POINTS•MARKET STRATEGY-MUST DEFINE SPECIFICS IN EACH SECTOR AS TO POTENTIAL CUSTOMER & SALES VALUE•TRUE VALUE OF COMPANY IN INDUSTRIAL MARKET PLACE- 3X,4X OR 5X•SWOT-REASSESSMENT NEEDED TO ASSURE ORGANIZATION & CULTURE IS SUPPORTIVE OF “FACTORY OF FUTURE’ AND SUSTAINABLE•FINANCIAL STRUCTURE-FUNDEMENTALS / RATIOS MUST BE IN LINE WITH COMPETITORS•MANUFACTURING CAPABILITY & CAPACITY MUST EXHIBIT GROWTH POTENTIAL
FUTURE:
CustomerContract
Level Load(FINITE PLAN)
Supplier
Mthly ShipmentsOf R/M
Level ofInventory
Release/Distribute
R/M
Finished Parts
Max---
Min---
Assy/Ship
*Inventory Controlled using “Pull” System. “Visual Control”
VISUAL SYSTEMS
PARTNERING3PL
VISIONLEAN CULTURE & COMMITMENT FOR TOTAL TRANSFORMATION
TURN KEY PROVIDER THAT DELIVERSINNOVATIVE / QUALITY / RELIABLE PRODUCT
SMALL COMPANY STRUCTURE WITH BIG BUSINESS CAPABILITY
ABILITY TO COMPETE
Great CompleteSolution
GoodQualitySource
MARTON
Hire 5 people
Work like 10 People
Pay like 8 People
Core Competency
Best
PassionEconomical Driver
Disciplined People…Thoughts…Actions…Repetitative Cycles-Question / Debate / Decision / Autopsy
Strong level of ComprehensionPredict-Question-Visualize-Sequence-Compare-Cause / Effect-Summarize
=
Key Philosophy & Methodology
Group FacilitatorYou’re empowered
Task MasterHere is what to do &
How…do it!
Builder of Learning Organization
Here is our purpose & direction
I will guide & coach
Bureaucratic MgrFollow the rules
General ManagementExpertise
In-DepthUnderstandingOf Work
Top-
Dow
nDi
recti
ves
Botto
m -U
pDe
velo
pmen
t LEADERSHIP MODEL
Learning Enterprise
Enabling Systems
Clear Expectations
Stable, Reliable Processes
Fair and Honorable Business Relations
Next Level Of Improvement
Stabilility
•Map all elements together as a system•Sense of accountability throughout Value Stream•Coercive vs. Enabling•Focus on the Manual Process, then automate•Visual Control
People & Partners
Eliminate Process Waste
Philosophy-Long Term Thinking
Continuous
LEARN TO DEAL WITH DICSDriving / Inspiring / Cautious / Steady people•Driver•Expressive•Analytical•Amiable
= Reserved & Slow
= Outgoing & Fast
IDEAL STATEMENT
•4 HABITS- ALWAYS KEEP END STATE IN MIND / PROACTIVE / FIRST THINGS FIRST / UNDERSTAND, THEN BE UNDERSTOOD
•ABILITY TO COMPETE – 5 PEOPLE WORK LIKE 10, PAY LIKE 7
•STABLE & RELIABLE PROCESSES
•GOALS FOR ALL ELEMENTS OF COMPANY
•PARADIGM SHIFT UNDERSTOOD BY ALL –EVERYONE SEE’S NEED
•5 SEC LOOK TO UNDERSTAND ‘WHERE ARE WE”
Ideal State Vision
Future State Focus
Waste
Process Model Focus
Business Driver
Emp Subs
Emp Major Assy
Prop Sub
Prop Major Assy
EBU
Spare
Burning Platform
Affordability
Charter
Ideal Statement
Key Elements/
Requirements
Go Fwd
MOS/Lean Score
G/O Milestones
Lean Milestone/Plan
Ideal State
Market competitorControl Tower
VOS
Level
1
3
4
2
VOC Safety Quality Schdl Cost
SPF/Cell & People moving (crew cycling) to support demand +/-
•Affordability for ultimate customer•Timing to redeploy workforce•Balance workforce to market place
VISION BOARD
SIPO
1. Defined Strategic Elements / Strategic plan to support Marton Vision & Business Market
2. Structure organization to assure min overlap and complete ownership to assure 99.9 value add operations.
3. Complete SWOT, finalize TOP FIVE that have the most impact on the strategic direction and establish measures to track results of actions.
4. Establish Financial targets and budgets, then educate process owners on their relationship to financials. (visibility for each key decision maker)
5. Engage employees in an aggressive “lean” focus to eliminate process failures and to maximize the utilization of all employees with measured processes.
13
Establish “End State” & Get Understanding by Key Personnel
*Must Align to Strategic Business Plan
•Performance Mgmt•Competitive Analysis –Targeted Change
•Contracts Mgmt•Capacity Plan
•Job Performance•Machine•Assemble
Process Definition
Support Execute
Quality&OpsExcellence Operations
MgmtMfgEXPECTATION ENABLE EXECUTE
Redesign
Improve
Improve
Set Expectation
Process Design
& Execute
Performance Tracking
•Formal Review
CPI Projects:•LLI / NOV SPF•Visibility Bds
•Klune Cell Flow•Quality –FPY
•Ideal State Supt
Capacity Analysis
•3-6 mth plan
Skills Assessmt.• Hire KeyPosition
R/M Contracts•LTA-JIT
OP Suppliers•JIT / pull
system plan
Shop Load•Level load all
production cells
VMS•Implement OEE•Implement Job
Pack
ASSY Ld &Inv. Mgmt.(Kanban)
SMED(set up
Reduction)
Current Focus1-2
months
Near TermFocus(3-8
months)
TOP OBJECTIVES
TOP FIVE OBJECTIVES / ACTIONS & RELATIONSHIP TO ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
LEADERSHIP MODEL & ROLES
R & DMarket Estimate & Quote
Procure
•R/M Buy•OP / OM
Tool Mgmt•Prekit
Bench Marking & Comparative
Analysis
Assure Competitiveness
Lean Structure with a Quality Focus
Assure Productivity
Supply Chain Alignment
Employee Involvement
Factory Flow
•Ideal state flow
Enhanced 5X Capability
•Inventory•Maintenance (Facility & Machine)•Tool Mgmt
•Job Planning•Schedule•Customer Status
•Continuous Improvement•CRM•QSM
MARTON END STATE 2015
HIGH & LOW VOLUME BUT CONTINUOUS
HIGH VOLUME , HIGH MIXBUT CONTINUOUS
SHORT RUN, HIGH MIX, LOW VOLUME
PROCESS ENGINEERING GROUPALL CPI FOCUSED
TECHNICAL R&D GROUPADDITIVE MFG
THREE ENABLERSFOR GROWTH & POSITIONING
1.SDWT-
2.TECHNICAL PARTNERS
3.TECHNOLOGY