Upload
shayna-lambirth
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CSU Chico Case Study
• Chico Academic Technologies Profile
• LMS Selection Process
• The Change to Enterprise LMS
• Project Schedule, Planning & Teams
• Faculty Training
• Issues and Challenges
• Resources
Calif. State University, Chico• 90 miles north of Sacramento• 14,550 FTE / 15,600 Students• 913 Faculty• Serving 12 counties in NE California • 30-year history in distance education• 1995 Technology and Learning Program (TLP)• 1998 started with WebCT 1.3 • Chico is one of the original 14 WebCT Institutes• Instructional Designers design training• Rubric for Online Instruction
Chico’s WebCT 4.1 Status
• 96% of students access WebCT
• 32% of course sections (active/engaged)
• 68% of faculty using WebCT
• WebCT 4.1 Server: – SUN V880 - 4 processors, Solaris 8– 350GB Hardware RAID
• System & Course back-ups nightly
Estimated WebCT Usage
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Spring2003
Spring2004
Spring2005
Faculty
Students
CourseSections
14,727 Students
1,547 Sections
760 Faculty
Spring2006
15000
WebCT Integration• Portal/LDAP
– uPortal channel links to current term courses– Link to MyWebCT to link to other courses– LDAP supports direct “back-door” access to WebCT
• Student Information System– 2003 SCT SIS+ “Connected Learning Solution”– Course shell for every course section– Adds and Drops “semi-real-time”– Moved to PeopleSoft Fall 2005
• Library– Course shell: generic link to Library resources
Next Generation LMS
• Available 24x7
• Fault Tolerant
• Integrated with other campus systems
• Expandable
• Today’s technology (no perl, relational db)
• Must do migration from WebCT 4.1
• “Modern” features
Chico IT Strategic Planning
• Target 2000 --> Beyond 2000 -->
• Aligning with the Future
• http://www.csuchico.edu/inf/
• These plans included the LMS
• We were changing ERP systems
• The LMS was going to move with them
• Latch on to change and ride the tail
LMS II Selection Process• CIO charged a campus committee• Committee Demographics• Review Chico State’s Priorities
– Teaching and Learning– Academic Program Assessment– Support and Sustainability– Enterprise Integration– Institutional Partnership
• LMS Needs Analysis and Rubrics
Vista Enterprise Wide (VEW) DVD
• Changing the Learning Management System
• Moving it to an Enterprise Application
Old ArchitectureOld Architecture
WebCT CE
LDAP
Network Back-upsuPortal
www
Student InformationSystem
Data
Users
Auth
ATEC“Control”
Computing NetworkingWeb ServicesDBAsApplications
Change Management• Academic Technologies
– Vista hotfixes, service packs and upgrades
• Computing Services– OS upgrades and patches
• Security and Networking– Host firewall issues
• DBAs– Oracle configuration, monitoring,
management and upgrades
Enterprise Planning (Communication!)
• Kick-Off meetings (technical and campus)
– Informed IT Team• Establish ownership & collaboration
– Informed campus• Set expectations & future vision
• Project Planning Teams
• Project Planning Meetings
Project ManagementBill EvansProject ManagementBill Evans
Vista Project Teams (Rev 3/06)
California State University, Chico
User Services
DBAsApplication Development
Vista Technical Mgmt LeadD. McElrobertsVista Technical Mgmt LeadD. McElroberts
NetworkingATEC
Project ManagementProject Management
B Evans
P Weddington
L Post
D McElroberts
D Partington
K Fernandes
Implementation CommitteeImplementation Committee
F- B Evans
J Kennedy
T Somma
K Batt
S Hillaire
T – D Partington
B Groendyke
Systems Team HW/SW/AppSystems Team HW/SW/App
B Evans
L Sederberg
K Fernandes
L Sederberg
J Ringel
B Kissinger
D Kuechel
F – B Evans
C Araya
T Somma
T – D McElroberts
P Berry
Technical Integration and Testing
Technical Integration and Testing
F-L Sederberg
C Araya
J Nowotny
T- B Evans
B EvansC Franquet
Functional Testing TeamFunctional Testing Team
T – C Franquet
L Sederberg
Faculty Training & Support
Faculty Training & Support
C Franquet
T- C Araya
F - L Sederberg
B Evans
J Nowotny
Content MigrationContent Migration
Application & System Security
Application & System Security
T Somma
T-D Partington
F- B Evans
Student Training & Support
Student Training & Support
Esposto
L Sederberg
M Ferris
C Franquet
T Somma
B Banks
T – J Nowotny
S Blackstone
J Ringel
P Weddington C Araya
Application AdministrationApplication Administration
B Evans
T Somma
B Evans
L Sederberg
L Gardiner
C Guenter
R Esposto
B Banks
CommunicationsCommunications
L Sederberg
V Breeden
B OppyJ Bracey
R Esposto
J Irving
Vista Project DirectorKathy FernandesVista Project DirectorKathy Fernandes
S Hillaire
B Groendyke A MoxA Mox
D Abbott
A Graham
D Abbott
Vista Project Instructional Documentary
Vista Project Instructional Documentary
K Fernandes
D Carter
L Sederberg
B EvansC Araya
P DiFalcoC Franquet
C FranquetJ NowotnyS Kodai
S Kodai
S Kodai
J Musselman
M Owens
M Spiess
Faculty
PeopleSoft
Info Security
Project Scheduling & TrackingProject Scheduling & TrackingChico Project Vista Production Deployment Timeline Rev. 7/6/06
Vista Production Milestones 3 10 17 24 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29
System Security Plan
Service Levels
Catastrophic Recovery Plan
Faculty Training
Summer Pilot Classes (5/22-8/16)
Course Migrations (automated) Course Migrations
Fall 2006 PeopleSoft Loads
Vista Health Check C
System Freeze C
Fall Classes Begin (8/21) Fall Classes
Upgrade to Oracle 10G?
Vista Integration and Test 3 10 17 24 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29
PS Integration Plan/Dev/Test C FLoad Balance Plan/Dev/Test C FLoad Test (app & server-Plan/Dev/Test) C FValidate Failure & Recovery Processes C FWebCT CE SSO to Vista Prod C FuPortal Integration (SSO - validation) V FCAS? (SSO-validation) V? FFunctional Test Plan/Dev/Test C F
SymbolsLS, LF = Load Summer, Fall data from PeopleSoftC = Completion V = ValidationP1, P2, P3 = Phase 1-3
Aug-06 Sep-06Jul-06
Aug-06 Sep-06Jul-06 Dec-06
Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06
Dec-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Nov-06
Nov-06
Nov-06
Dec-06
Targets and Milestones• 2005
– Fall – Installation & Train the Trainers– Fall/Winter – Develop Training for Faculty
• 2006– Winter – Train Fac. & Develop Pilot Courses– Spring – Run Pilot Courses; Integration
– Full Training Series; Train Faculty – Summer – Migrate courses; Test integration– Fall – Half courses running in Vista
• 2007– Spring – All courses in Vista– Summer – Clean-up & wrap up
LMS Transition by Department
• More fun to learn with people you know
• Less confusion for students
• Easier management of change
• Vista is a better department tool– Group decisions/communication
– Sharing resources
– Program assessment goals
Training Options
• “Transition to Vista” migration module– 2-1/2 hours, experience with WebCT CE
required
• Foundation series– Vista 101 through 105 (beginners welcome)
• Intermediate modules – List of electives by topic
Faculty: Why Training?
• Faculty decisions to be made– Migration methods to choose from
– Migrate one course or more?
– Consultations
Faculty Training Aids
• Coffee and cookies
• Graphics for Vista tools
• Posters
• Hats for Build, Teach & Student tabs
• T-Shirts
Training with PropsTraining with Props
Chico trainers teach Vista tabs with hats:
Build = Construction hat
Teach = Mortar board
Student View = Chico ball cap
Issues & Challenges
• Getting Buy-in/Ownership– Started with selection process– System maintenance
• Cost factors: Buy or build? – Training? Services?
• Getting others plans – Strategic Plans– Project Plans
Resource Links
• Chico’s IT Strategic Planswww.csuchico.edu/inf/
• Chico’s VEW Web sitewww.csuchico.edu/tlp/vew/
• Rubric for Online Instruction
www.csuchico.edu/celt/roi/