12
STICH2

STICH2

  • Upload
    niles

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

STICH2. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: STICH2

STICH2

Page 2: STICH2

Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment inpatients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebralhaematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial

A David Mendelow, Barbara A Gregson, Elise N Rowan, Gordon D Murray, Anil Gholkar, Patrick M Mitchell, for the STICH II Investigators

www.thelancet.com

Published online May 29, 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60986-1

Page 3: STICH2

Background• Stroke – 3rd highest cause of death (heart disease and

cancer 1 and 2)• Spont ICH – 8-14% strokes• Mortality up to 50%• Independence 20% at 6/12• Large/ expanding Haematoma, hyperglycaemia,

seizures and BP elevation related to outcome

Page 4: STICH2

STICH 1• Failed to show a benefit from early surgey

(haematoma evacuation) v conservative Mx - (worse outcomes with surgery especially if large/ intraventricular haemorrhage)• Of the prespecified subgroups that were examined,

patients with an ICH within 1cm of the cortical surface showed a benefit for early surgery • Statistical testing of this subgroup was not adjusted

for the multiple subgroup comparisons

Page 5: STICH2

STICH II • Performed to confirm a benefit of surgery in the latter

group• 601 patients who had a spontaneous lobar ICH on

computed tomography (1 cm or less from the cortical surface of the brain)• Volume 10 to 100 mL• <48 hours of ictus• Best motor score on the GCS of 5 or 6• Best eye score of 2 or more. • Randomly assigned to early surgery or conservative

treatment.

Page 6: STICH2

• Primary outcome was a prognosis-based favorable or unfavorable outcome as defined by the score on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months. • This was calculated by answers to 14 questions sent

by mail to patients or their relatives• Large crossover in the conservative group, with 21%

of these patients ending up having surgery, mostly because of deterioration. • The authors noting that: "these are the ones with the

worst prognosis when surgeons are compelled to operate."

Page 7: STICH2

Primary analysis (intention to treat) showed a small but nonsignificant increase in the number of patients having a favorable outcome at 6 months in the early surgery group. “Suggestion” of a reduction in mortality – (nonsignificant)

Outcome Early Surgery (%) Conservative Treatment (%)

Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value

Favorable outcome 41 38 0.86 (0.62 - 1.20) .367

Death 18 24 0.71 (0.48 - 1.06) .095

Table. STICH-II: 6-Month Results  

Page 8: STICH2

Conclusion..• A benefit of 4% is not really enough to change practice• Deaths were significantly lower in the surgery group at 30 and 90

days but not at 6 months — the time of the primary endpoint.• Underpowered, even with the similar patients from STICH I it

does not quite reach statistical significance• Does provide the best evidence available however still no

evience of benefit• 2 trials using minimally invasive procedures — CLEAR III (Clot

Lysis: Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage III) and MISTIE III (Minimally Invasive Surgery plus rt-PA for ICH Evacuation III) — are continuing

Page 9: STICH2

What else..?• BP lowering ineffective – moderate loweringstill

recommended in AHA guidelines (level C evidence)• rF5VIIIa reduces haematoma expansion but did not

impact outcomes• Tight glucose control – nil benefit from glucose

infusions v sliding scales. One study showed significantly worse outcomes

Page 10: STICH2

New Avenues or therapy:

• Apoptosis of neurons within the haematoma and surrounding issue occurs with TNF receptor subtypes implicated as a critical component. Attempts to modulate this pathophysiological process has become one of the primary foci of research...

Page 11: STICH2
Page 12: STICH2

Management• Excellent supportive care• Sensitive discussion with family• Referral to stroke unit• Anticoagulation reversal when applicable

• FFP use to reverse warfarin (contains factors II, VII, IX and X required) - can require 10u (2000ml) to reverse INR - can be a problem in patients with background of cardiac disease .Time to reversal varies in studies: 7-32 hours due to practical considerations.

• PCC (prothrombin complex concentrate) has rapid action (about 20 minutes) with minimum volume required - expensive, risk of thrombotic complications, DIC.

• Vitamin K - has an effect as early as 4 hours and can reverse the INR as early as 8 hours. Risks - anaphylaxis (rare).

• Factor VIIa also reverses the INR within minutes - risk of increased thrombotic complication. $$ expensive