40
Welcome 1 © 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Andy Howard Senior Application Specialist Agilent EEsof EDA Steven Baker Founder & Director OpenET Alliance

Steven Baker Founder & Director OpenET Alliance RF signal considerations 26 Complexity of amplifier model (behavioral or transistor-level?) Signal Complexity (primarily length) and

  • Upload
    lyduong

  • View
    220

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Welcome

1

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Andy Howard

Senior Application Specialist

Agilent EEsof EDA

Steven Baker

Founder & Director

OpenET Alliance

Outline

Steven Baker, OpenET Alliance

• What problem are we trying to solve?

• What is Envelope Tracking?

• Envelope Tracking Market Status

Andy Howard, Agilent EEsof EDA

• Simulating Envelope Tracking

• What type of amplifier model?

• Characterizing the power amplifier

• Modulation signals

• Preliminary simulations

• Investigating non-idealities

2

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Envelope Tracking—An Introduction

Steven Baker, OpenET Alliance

What is the OpenET Alliance?

A non-profit corporation that operates as an open membership industry

association

With a mission to drive the development and adoption of envelope

tracking techniques, components and products in the wireless

communications industry, to deliver more efficient RF transmitters

We do this by explaining the benefits of envelope tracking and enabling

the ecosystem through standardisation, tools, research and networking

Members include baseband & transceiver vendors, PA vendors, power

modulator vendors, OEMs and leading academics

www.open-et.org

Page 4

Introduction

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance

What’s the problem?

What’s envelope tracking and how does it help?

Market status

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 5

Outline

Introduction

Increasing Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR)

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 6

Standard Launched

Spectral Efficiency (bpsHz

-1)

PAPR (dB)

Fixed Supply

Efficiency (typ. %)

GSM 1991 0.17 0 65

WCDMA 2003 0.1 3.4 45

HSUPA 2008 1. 5 6.5 35

LTE 2010 4 8 30

What’s the Problem?

Introduction

Increasing band fragmentation

As PAPR goes up PA efficiency goes down

Band fragmentation broadband operation even lower efficiency

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 7

Envelope Tracking at 50,000 Feet

Introduction

Constant supply Variable envelope

Variable supply

Variable envelope

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 8

Instantaneous Efficiency

Introduction

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Devic

e E

ffic

iency (

%)

Pout (dBm) 40 30 20 10 0 -10

1.0 V 1.5 V 2.0 V 2.5 V 3.0 V 3.5 V 4.0 V 4.5 V 5.0V

Fixed supply efficiency locus Envelope Tracking efficiency locus

Signal PDF

Average

Peak

PAPR ~8dB

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 9

Power Amplifier Q-DAC

I-DAC

To Rxr

Duplexer I

Q

Vbatt

Envelope Tracking at 5,000 Feet

Introduction

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance Page 10

Power Amplifier Q-DAC

I-DAC

To Rxr

Duplexer I

Q

Env- DAC

Magnitude calculator

Pre-envelope

gain

Envelope shaping

Envelope Tracking

Modulator

Vbatt

Post-envelope

gain & offset

Delay

B

A

Envelope Tracking at 5,000 Feet

Introduction

Market Status

LTE Infrastructure

• Successfully deployed in fully commercial 40W remote radio heads

LTE Terminals

• All major silicon platform vendors are working on ET solutions today

• If you’re working on LTE terminals or LTE terminal technologies you’ll be

working with envelope tracking in the next year to 18 months

LTE Small Cells

• Growing interest in ET as a solution for small cells—power consumption,

thermal management, ‘broadbanding’

www.open-et.org

Page 11

Introduction

© Copyright 2012 OpenET Alliance

Outline

Steven Baker, OpenET Alliance

• What problem are we trying to solve?

• What is Envelope Tracking?

• Envelope Tracking Market Status

Andy Howard, Agilent EEsof EDA

• Simulating Envelope Tracking

• What type of amplifier model?

• Characterizing the power amplifier

• Modulation signals

• Preliminary simulations

• Investigating non-idealities

12

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Simulating Envelope Tracking

13

Sample

Input Signal

Power

Apply Shaping

Load

Modulated

Input

Signal

Modulate

Drain

Voltage

Modulate drain voltage in response to input signal envelope

Shaping curve attempts to maintain constant gain or gain compression

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Outline

Simulating Envelope Tracking

What type of amplifier model?

Characterizing the power amplifier

Modulation signals

Preliminary simulations

Investigating non-idealities

14

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

What type of amplifier model?

15

Do you have a transistor-level amplifier model?

If you just have a physical amplifier, can you measure its X-parameters?

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Outline

Simulating Envelope Tracking

What type of amplifier model?

Characterizing the power amplifier

Modulation signals

Preliminary simulations

Investigating non-idealities

16

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Characterizing the power amplifier

17

Checking for memory effects and bandwidth

Obtaining data for constant-gain shaping

Obtaining data for constant-gain-compression shaping

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Testing for memory effects

18

Inject two tones; sweep their spacing

Inequality between lower and upper intermodulation distortion tone

amplitudes => memory effects

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Testing for memory effects (a different amplifier)

19

Memory effects significant for tones > ~100 kHz spacing

Amplifier may still work well for narrower band signals

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

An alternative way of testing for memory effects –

using Envelope simulator

20

2 tones,

spaced

1.5 MHz

2 tones,

spaced

150 kHz

Vload phasor

versus time

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Obtaining data for constant-gain shaping table

21

Simulate amplifier with HB;

sweep both Pavs (available

source power) and

drain bias

Specify desired gain:

If available source power = 10.5 dBm, set drain bias to 3.5 V to keep gain = 11 dB

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Obtain new shaping table for different gain,

instantly

22

If available source power = 10.55 dBm, set drain bias to 3.0 V to keep gain = 10 dB

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Obtaining data for constant-gain-compression

shaping table

23

Desired gain

compression

set to 1.5 dB:

Drain bias versus source

power to maintain

constant gain

compression

Available Source Power, dBm

Dra

in B

ias V

olta

ge

Drain Bias

Voltage

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Obtain new shaping table for different amount of

gain compression, instantly

24

Desired gain

compression

set to 2.0 dB:

Drain bias versus source

power to maintain

constant gain

compression

Available Source Power, dBm

Dra

in B

ias V

olta

ge

Drain Bias

Voltage

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Outline

Simulating Envelope Tracking

What type of amplifier model?

Characterizing the power amplifier

Modulation signals

Preliminary simulations

Investigating non-idealities

25

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Modulated RF signal considerations

26

Complexity of

amplifier model

(behavioral or

transistor-level?)

Signal Complexity (primarily length)

and measurement

(PAE, AM-to-AM, AM-to-PM, or

specification-compliant EVM?)

Shorter simulation time

Longer simulation time

Late in design process: use longer signals, obtain specification-compliant results

Early in design process: use short signals, obtain quick results, make changes

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Obtaining modulated RF signals

27

Numerous sources exist in Ptolemy Wireless Libraries

I and Q baseband data may be modulated onto RF carrier

Obtain from Agilent Signal Studio software

Example of LTE signal and its statistics

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Outline

Simulating Envelope Tracking

What type of amplifier model?

Characterizing the power amplifier

Modulation signals

Preliminary simulations

Investigating non-idealities

28

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Short simulation with fixed bias

29

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Fixed bias simulation results

30

Power delivered to load, dBm

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Short simulation with envelope tracking bias

31

Ideal, behavioral components detect input power,

read corresponding drain bias from shaping table in file

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Simulation results with envelope tracking bias

32

Power delivered to load, dBm

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Things to consider

33

Power amplifier gate bias and minimum drain bias

Amplitude of input modulation signal

Type of shaping table – constant gain or gain compression

Performance sensitivity to external source and load

impedances

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Ptolemy co-simulation with a Vector Signal

Analysis sink

34

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Outline

Simulating Envelope Tracking

What type of amplifier model?

Characterizing the power amplifier

Modulation signals

Preliminary simulations

Investigating non-idealities

35

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Modeling a finite slew rate in the bias modulator

36

Slew rate =

40 V/microsecond

Slew rate =

10 V/microsecond

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Modeling a time delay difference between RF and

bias modulation signals

37

Time delay delta =

0 nanoseconds

Time delay delta =

20 nanoseconds

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Summary

38

Agilent ADS – well suited for:

• Modeling power amplifiers

• Investigating power amplifier performance

• Generating and simulating modulated signals

• Investigating envelope tracking schemes

• Modeling various non-idealities

© 2012 Agilent Technologies, Inc.