13
Status of the CSC Track- Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida

Status of the CSC Track-Finder

  • Upload
    bryson

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Status of the CSC Track-Finder. Darin Acosta University of Florida. CSC Sector Processor Prototype 2. 15 × 1.6 Gb/s optical link connections from CSC electronics. Xilinx Virtex-2 800 User I/O. Test Status. Basically all functionality has been successfully tested Optical links: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

Status of the CSC Track-Finder

Darin Acosta

University of Florida

Page 2: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 2Darin Acosta, University of Florida

CSC Sector Processor Prototype 2

15 × 1.6 Gb/s optical link connections from CSC electronics

Xilinx Virtex-2800 User I/O

Page 3: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 3Darin Acosta, University of Florida

Test Status Basically all functionality has been successfully tested Optical links:

Demonstrated to work error-free during Sept’03 beam test with home-built PLL+VCXO and with latest QPLL (TTCRq)

LUT Tests: Validated loading and read-back of all 45 SR LUTs and 3 PT

LUTs using random numbers and simulated muon LUT files SP Track-Finding Logic Tests:

Downloaded random data and simulated muon data into 512 BX input FIFO, read-back and compare output FIFO

No discrepancies in 1.2M random events No discrepancies in 13K single muon events,

or 4K triple muon events (3 single muons piled up) Verilog model also “installed” into ORCA

Complete functionality test Input FIFO LUTs Track-Finding output FIFO

Page 4: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 4Darin Acosta, University of Florida

Interface Tests MPC to Sector Processor

Validated with optical link tests SP to Muon Sorter Test

Data successfully sent from SP to Muon Sorter and received properly. Read-back of winner bits also correct.

Tested 10/12 slots on custom GTLP backplane Plan multiple SP to MS test

DT/CSC Data Exchange Test Demonstrated to work during Sept’03 in both directions, with

only a few minor problems with swapped bits, connectors, and dead chips

Clock and Control Board (TTC interface) New design based on discrete logic and with TTCRq installed

still needs to be tested (beginning April)

Page 5: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 5Darin Acosta, University of Florida

Beam Test Goals Base goal:

Set up pre-production system and repeat prior tests using 25 ns structured beam

New CCB design Additional goals:

Test TMB2004 with RAT Use new DDU+DCC (FED) developed by OSU Use fully functional Track-Finder system (self-triggering) Use fully functional XDAQ-based event builder and run control Use new crate controller developed by OSU Add an ME1/2 chamber in order to have 3-chamber test (for SP) Swap ME1/1 in for ME1/2 Mount an endcap RPC on ME1/2, connect Link board to RAT,

record RPC data in TMB Add a small block of iron absorber between (15x15x30 cm?) to

validate OSCAR/ORCA simulation

June structured beam period

Page 6: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 6Darin Acosta, University of Florida

TMB + RAT Preproduction boards

Final prototypes produced and passed all tests. 27 preproduction TMB-RAT sets being produced,

10 of these delivered and are being tested.

RPC ALCT

Transition board

TMB

Page 7: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 7Darin Acosta, University of Florida

Rad-Tolerant CCB Prototype

Basic VME interface is implemented using discrete logic

Critical functions of CCB will be immune to SEU

New TTCrq mezzanine with QPLL ASIC

Has an FPGA for flexibility

Status 7 prototype boards

being produced. 1 board delivered. Hardware looks good. Testing and

debugging in progress.

Page 8: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 8Darin Acosta, University of Florida

Updates to Track-Finder Firmware improvements

Multiple-BX input acceptance for track segments Track-Finding parameters under VME control (e.g. windows) Error counters, track segment counters, track counters for monitoring Ghost-busting at sector boundaries

Increases di-muon trigger acceptance to ||<2.4 when low quality CSC tracks included

Installed into ORCA Self-trigger capability

A Level-1 Accept signal can be generated based on the presence of a track for beam test use

Goes onto bussed backplane to CCB, then out front-panel New DT/CSC transition card designed

SCSI connectors on one side of card Ability to perform self-test with tester card Fabrication completed by May 2004 Plan another DT/CSC interface test in Oct’04

Page 9: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 9Darin Acosta, University of Florida

New DT/CSC Transition Board Layout

Page 10: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 10Darin Acosta, University of Florida

CSC Track-Finding Latency

11 25 ns, or 275 ns

Page 11: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 11Darin Acosta, University of Florida

CSC Trigger Latency Measured with scope during the beam tests:

From CSC to MPC input: 32 bx ( 1 bx) From the CSC to SR/SP input: 57 bx

(includes 90 m fiber, 18 bx delay) Estimated latency for output of SP:

Add 11 bx for SR/SP processing: 68 bx Estimated latency for output of Muon Sorter:

Add 7 bx for backplane + sorting: 75 bx Total compares well with 74.5 bx projected in TDR

(Latter includes 1 bx TOF delay) Hope to save additional ~7 bx with “Virtex-2” TMB Estimated latency to send CSC data to DT TF:

1bx TOF + 57bx + 5bx for SR + 2bx cable: 65 bx – 7 bx = 58 bx Nearly aligned with DT data at DT TF: 54 bx according to TDR

Page 12: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 12Darin Acosta, University of Florida

CSC Track-Finder Rack Layout

Page 13: Status of the CSC Track-Finder

16 March 2004 CMS Week 13Darin Acosta, University of Florida

CSC Track-Finder Milestones

CSC Bckpl Proto tested Sep-02 Delay: Mar-04 DoneCSC CCB Proto tested Sep-02 Done New design tested Jun-04CSC SR/SP Proto tested Mar-03 Delay: Mar-04 ~Done, wait for Jun-04 testCSC MPC Proto tested Mar-03 Delay: Mar-04 ~Done, wait for Jun-04 testCSC SR/SP-MPC-CCB Tested Jun-03 Delay: Mar-04 ~Done, wait for Jun-04 testCSC Sort Proto done Aug-03 DoneCSC Sort Proto Tested Nov-03 Delay: Mar-04 Needs GMT testCSC Sort Final Bd done Mar-04 Delay: Oct-04CSC Bckpl Prod. done Mar-04 Delay: Oct-04CSC CCB Prod. done Mar-04 Delay: Oct-04CSC Sort Final Bd Test Jun-04 Delay: Jan-05

CSC SR/SP Prod. done Jun-04 Delay: Oct-04 Delayed to Jan-05 CSC MPC Prod. done Jun-04 Delay: Oct-04CSC Bckpl Prod. tested Aug-04 Delay: Jan-05CSC CCB Prod. tested Aug-04 Delay: Jan-05CSC SR/SP Prod. tested Nov-04 Delay: Jan-05 Delayed to Mar-05