10
Status G Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

4/21/2008RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 3 Only room for the most prominent results STAR incl. jets PHENIX incl. p 0 s

Citation preview

Page 1: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

Status G Section of Whitepaper

J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow,

W. Vogelsang

Page 2: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 2

Our charge from Steve

“…should probably include brief updates on present projections of Delta G and transverse spin sensitivities to be attained in the remaining 200 GeV running”

“Will there be sufficient integrated luminosity to attain the desired Delta G sensitivities in photon and photon-jet production? If not, are there alternatives?”

For you in this talk:What is missing?What is too much?Refine the message(s)?

Page 3: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 3

Only room for the most prominent results

STAR incl. jets PHENIX incl. 0s

Page 4: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 4

These results from RHIC have had a strong impact on our knowledge of G

Global fit D. de Florian, R. Sassot, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang

Page 5: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 5

Future: Increased statistics for inclusives still have important contributions to make

PHENIX 25 pb-1 P=60%

G=0.15G=0

Add run 9 to G.A. (Run6)/4

Page 6: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 6

Semi-inclusive channels to map g(x)STAR di-jets 50 pb-1 P=60%

Xmin = 0.08Xmax =0.20

Xmin = 0.08Xmax =0.20

Xmin = 0.13Xmax =0.15

Xmin = 0.08Xmax =0.32

Xmin = 0.04Xmax =0.37

Xmin = 0.03Xmax =0.46

Typical partonic x pT =10 GeV (LO)

Page 7: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 7

-jets limited in statistics at 50 pb-1 but still could have impact

xgluon resolution in PHENIX greatly improved with vertex tracker

100% eff. - Perfect BG rejection in STAR for -jets. Di-jets hard to beat but strong cross check could be possible.

50 pb-1 P=60%

GSRV

DSSV

Page 8: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 8

Placeholder for feasibility of -jet statistical precision

STAR MC simulations – hope to still have something by PAC

SMD shower shape bg rejection vs. efficiency

Page 9: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 9

What about lower xgluon ?

g(x=0.02)/g(x=0.02)~0.05

Central detectorspT=10GeV

FMS -central jetpT=2GeV

Q2 = 10GeV2

FMS -jet correlation for pT=2GeV and estimate significant number of events in 50 pb-1 wrt g(x)/g(x)=0.05

What is g(x)/g(x) allowed to do for x<0.02?500 GeV one option.

Phenix similar possibility with MPC – Central Cal.

Page 10: Status DG Section of Whitepaper J. Sowinski, A. Deshpande, Y. Goto, M. Stratmann,B. Surrow, W. Vogelsang

4/21/2008 RSC Meeting BNL J. Sowinski 10

W physics means lots of beam time at 500 GeV.What can we do there for G?Lower x….

The end of this talk but not the work.