STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORT...PRPARD FR Prepared y CORRIDOR PROFILE STUDY PROGRAM Final Report STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORT h'h^d2 1 ADT CNTRACT NO. 11-013164 ADT R TAS NO. MPD 043-15 PREPARED

P R E PA R E D F O R

Prepared by

C O R R I D O R P R O F I L E S T U D Y P R O G R A MC O R R I D O R P R O F I L E S T U D Y P R O G R A M

Final Report

STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORTSUMMARY REPORT

2 0 1 8

A D O T C O N T R A C T N O .

11-013164A D O T W O R K TA S K N O .

MPD 043-15

PREPARED FOR:

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PREPARED BY:

This report was funded in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data, and for the use or adaptation of previously published material, presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names that may appear herein are cited only because they

are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers.

STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORT

CORRIDOR PROFILE STUDY PROGRAMADOT WORK TASK NO. MPD 043-15

ADOT CONTRACT NO. 11-013164

FINAL REPORT AUGUST 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS1. 0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Corridor Profile Study Program PurPoSe 2

1.2 Corridor Profile Study Program goalS and objeCtiveS 2

1.3 Statewide overview and loCation 3

1.4 Corridor CharaCteriStiCS 3

1.5 Corridor Segmentation 5

2. 0 STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE & NEEDS 7

2.1 Corridor PerformanCe framework 7

2.2 Corridor needS aSSeSSment ProCeSS 8

2.3 Statewide Pavement 8

2.4 Statewide bridge 12

2.5 Statewide mobility 15

2.6 Statewide Safety 19

2.7 Statewide freight 23

2.8 Statewide PerformanCe Summary 27

2.9 Corridor needS Summary 28

3. 0 STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS 29

3.1 SCreening ProCeSS 29

3.2 Candidate SolutionS 30

4. 0 SOLUTION EV ALUATION AND PRIORITIZ ATION OV ERV IEW 32

5. 0 SUMMARY OF CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATIONS 33

5.1 Prioritized reCommended SolutionS 33

5.2 other Corridor reCommendationS 33

5.3 PoliCy and initiative reCommendationS 34

5.4 ConCluSionS 34

August 2018 i Statewide Summary ReportCorridor Profile Study Program

LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1: Statewide Study Areas 1Figure 2: CPS Program Elements 2Figure 3: Statewide Corridor Segmentation 6Figure 4 Corridor Profile Per orma e rame or 7Figure 5 eed e me t Pro e 8Figure 6 itial eed ati g i elatio to a eli e Per orma e ridge am le 8Figure 7 Pa eme t Per orma e ea ure 8Figure 8: Pavement Needs Distribution 9Figure 9 State ide Pa eme t Per orma e 11Figure 10: Statewide Pavement Needs 11Figure 11: ridge Per orma e ea ure 12Figure 12: Bridge Needs Distribution 13Figure 13 State ide ridge Per orma e 14Figure 14: Statewide Bridge Needs 14Figure 15: o ility Per orma e ea ure 15Figure 16: Mobility Needs Distribution 16Figure 17 State ide o ility Per orma e 18Figure 18: Statewide Mobility Needs 18Figure 19: Sa ety Per orma e ea ure 19Figure 20 Sa ety eed i tri utio 20Figure 21 State ide Sa ety Per orma e 22Figure 22 State ide Sa ety eed 22Figure 23: reig t Per orma e ea ure 23Figure 24: Freight Needs Distribution 24Figure 25 State ide reig t Per orma e 26Figure 26: Statewide Freight Needs 26Figure 27 State ide Per orma e Summary y Primary ea ure 27Figure 28: Statewide Average Needs 29Figure 29 Strategi eed S ree i g Pro e 30Figure 30 Pre S ree i g State ide Strategi e tme t rea 31Figure 31 Po t S ree i g State ide Strategi e tme t rea 31Figure 32 Ca didate Solutio aluatio Pro e 32Figure 33 State ide Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio 33

LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Corridor Segmentation 6Table 2 Corridor Per orma e ea ure 7Table 3 Pa eme t de S ori g a ge 9Table 4 o e t Per ormi g Pa eme t Segme t 10Table 5 ridge de S ori g a ge 12Table 6 o e t Per ormi g ridge Segme t 13Table 7 o ility de S ori g a ge 15Table 8 o e t Per ormi g o ility Segme t 17Table 9 Sa ety de S ori g a ge 19Table 10 o e t Per ormi g Sa ety Segme t 21Table 11 reig t de S ori g a ge 23Table 12 o e t Per ormi g reig t Segme t 25Table 13: Highest Needs Segments 28Table 14 State ide Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio 35

APPENDICESe di State ide Per orma e ae di Corridor Per orma e a lee di C Corridor eed a lee di Corridor S ree i g a lee di t er Corridor e omme datio

ii August 2018Statewide Summary ReportCorridor Profile Study Program

ACRONY MS & ABBREV IATIONS

erage ual aily ra fi

SS ri o a ridge ormatio a d Storage Sy tem

ri o a e artme t o ra ortatio

AZTDM Arizona Statewide Travel Demand Model

CC Clo ed Cir uit ele i io

CPS Corridor Profile Study

C Cra i g ati g

S y ami e age Sig

EB Eastbound

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

I Interstate

ter atio al oug e de

S tellige t ra ortatio Sy tem

CC i e Cy le Co t aly i

S e el o Ser i e

P o i g ead or Progre i t e t Ce tury

P ile o t

MPD Multimodal Planning Division

o S o Si gle u a y e i le

P2P Planning-to-Programming

P Pa eme t i tre de

P S Per orma e e ti e e S ore

PS Pa eme t Ser i ea ility ati g

P Pla i g ime de

S oad eat er ormatio Sy tem

S SP Strategi ig ay Sa ety Pla

S Si gle u a y e i le

SR State Route

ra fi ter a ge

P ru Pla i g ime de

ra el ime de

ru ra el ime de

C olume to a a ity atio

S aria le S eed imit

WB Westbound

WIM Weigh-in-Motion

August 2018 iii Statewide Summary ReportCorridor Profile Study Program

ROUND 2 (Spring 2015)

Cali or ia State i e to to e e i o State i e

SR 95: I-8 to I-40

ROUND 3 (Fall 2015)

S Cali or ia State i e to S to e e i o State i e

SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40 S S S lore e u tio S u tio to ougla

US 93/US 60: Nevada State Line to SR 303L


S to ra d Ca yo atio al Par S S ort S to Cali or ia State Line SR69/SR 89A/SR 89: I-17 to I-40 SR 77: US 60 to SR 377

S lag ta to ta State i e S S to u tio S

S S to e e i o State i e SR 179/SR 89A/SR 260: I-17 to I-17 SR 260/US 60: Heber-Overgaard to New

e i o State i e S S u tio to u tio


I-17: SR 101L to I-40 I-19: Nogales to I-10

Cali or ia State i e to

1. 0 INTRODUCTION

e ri o a e artme t o ra ortatio i t e lead age y or t e Corridor Profile Study CPS Program i om ri ed a erie o e arate tudie o ey orridor a ro t e tate

e e tudie e ami ed ey er orma e mea ure relati e to trategi orridor a d t e re ult o t e e er orma e e aluatio ere u ed to ide ti y ote tial trategi im ro eme t e i te t o t e CPS State ide Summary i to om i e t e re ult rom i di idual orridor re ort i to a tate ide re ort to aid Pla i g to Programmi g P P ro e e CPS a roa im leme t a er orma e a ed la i g ro e t at ide tifie area o eed a d orre o di g olutio o trategi orridor i a roa ide tifie t e mo t e fi ie t u e o a aila le u di g to ro ide t e

greate t e efit to t e tate ide tra ortatio et or

a o du ted CPS it i our e arate rou d et ee a d

i State ide Summary ummari e t e o erall ealt or er orma e o t e tate trategi orridor alo g atio al ig ay Sy tem S route t ide tifie rioriti ed a didate olutio or o ideratio i t e ultimodal Pla i g i i io P P P ro e t rioriti atio ro e ro idi g i ormatio to guide ro e t ele tio a d rogrammi g de i io a ro orridor t at

were studied.

Figure 1 de i t t e trategi tate ide orridor i luded i t e CPS State ide Summary

21CORRIDOR

PROFILE STUDIES

Figure 1: Statewide Study Areas

August 2018 1 Statewide Summary ReportCorridor Profile Study Program

a eleme t de elo ed t roug out t e CPS Program i illu trated i Figure 2.

1.2 Corridor Profile Study Program goalS and objeCtiveS

e o e ti e o t e CPS rogram i to ide ti y a re omme ded et o rioriti ed ote tial olutio or o ideratio i uture o tru tio rogram deri ed rom a tra are t de e i le logi al a d re li a le ro e Solutio a d im ro eme t re omme ded or ea orridor tudy ere om i ed a d ra ed to determi e i i e tme t o er t e greate t e efit to t e tate ide y tem e omme datio are ategori ed y t e ollo i g t ree i e tme t ty e

• Pre er atio ti itie t at rote t tra ortatio i ra tru ture y u tai i g a et o ditio or e te di g a et er i e li e

• oder i atio ig ay im ro eme t t at u grade e fi ie y u tio ality a d a ety it out addi g a a ity

1.1 Corridor Profile Study Program PurPoSe

e ur o e o t e CPS rogram i to mea ure orridor er orma e to i orm t e de elo me t o trategi olutio t at are o t e e ti e a d a ou t or ote tial ri i ur o e a e a om li ed y ollo i g t e ro e de ri ed elo

• e e i ti g er orma e a ed o ua tifia le er orma e mea ure

• Pro o e ariou olutio to im ro e orridor er orma e

• de ti y e ifi olutio a ro all orridor t at a ro ide ua tifia le e efit relati e to t e er orma e mea ure a d ide ti y a urate o t a o iated

• Prioriti e olutio or uture im leme tatio a ro all orridor a ou ti g or er orma e e e ti e e a d ri a aly i fi di g

StatewideSummary

Report

ExecutiveSummary

Combined Summaryof Corridor Reports

Summary of Corridor Report

Includes DetailedSegment-level Performance,

Needs, & Solutions

Breakdown of Analysisand Calculations

Corridor Background &Initial AnalysisWorking Papers

Final Report

Appendices

Figure 2: CPS Program Elements

2 August 2018Statewide Summary ReportCorridor Profile Study Program

ommuter tra fi o urri g et ee t e P oe i ur a i ed area ila e d ia S a d t e ri o a Pu li Ser i e Palo erde u lear Po er Pla t S er e a a P oe i y a

route or tru tra fi o utili i g to S o e ti g ort a to ile t ere are e dire t re reatio al a d touri t de ti atio t roug out t i orridor ro ide touri t o e ti ity or ot t e P oe i ur a i ed area a d out er Cali or ia

I-10: SR 202L to New Mexico State Line (I-10 East)e a t Corridor al o e erie e ig ifi a t ommuter tra fi rimarily i egme t

o e ti g t e ur a i ed area o greater P oe i a d u o dditio ally t i orridor ro ide dire t re reatio al a d touri m o e ti ity to P oe i a d u o a e to o e tio leadi g to ard out er Cali or ia a d t e S e i o order Cro i g a ell

a a e to ar a d re reatio area i ludi g Saguaro atio al Par C iri a ua atio al o ume t a d Catali a State Par

I-17: SR 101L to I-40 ro ide t e rimary ort out o e ti ity et ee e tral ri o a P oe i

ur a i ed area a d ort er ri o a lag ta a d o tai t e ort er ortio o t e Su Corridor termi ati g i t e Pre ott area e Corridor ro ide reig t o e ti ity torom t e P oe i ur a i ed area to a d ommuter o e ti ity amo g t multi le origide ti atio alo g t e orridor i ludi g P oe i t em e i er Pre ott Sedo a a d

lag ta dditio ally o e t t e P oe i ur a i ed area a d S y ar or ter atio al ir ort to ort er ri o a de ti atio i ludi g lag ta Sedo a ra d Ca yo atio al

Par Slide o State Par o te uma Ca tle atio al o ume t a d t e S o o l S i Resort.

I-19: Nogales to I-10e Corridor ro ide i ter atio al o e ti ity et ee e i o a d t e u o ur a i ed

area i t e egi i g egme t o t e ro o ed Corridor a ma or reig t route arryi g more t a tru daily a d o er ommuter o e ti ity to rom t e u o

ur a i ed area dditio ally t e Corridor ro ide re reatio al a d touri t o e ti ity to de ti atio i ludi g u o t e ri o a e i o order ro i g Saguaro atio al Par Coro ado atio al ore t a d u a

I-40: California State Line to I-17 (I-40 West)e e tire Corridor i a riti al ea t e t reig t route a d t ird lo ge t ter tate ig ay e ri o a lo ated egme t e erie e a t roug reig t tra fi a ell a i ter tate

reig t o e tio to rom t e P oe i ur a i ed area ma ority o t e e t ommuter tra fi o ur i t e lag ta a d i gma area dditio ally e t o er re reatio al a d touri t o e ti ity to lag ta ra d Ca yo atio al Par t e S o o l S i e ort a d a e a a u State Par

• a io m ro eme t t at add tra ortatio a a ity t roug t e additio o e a ilitie a d or er i e

Pro o ed re omme datio are om ared agai t ea ot er a ed o t eir li eli ood o a ie i g de ired er orma e le el li e y le o t a d o t e e ti e e re ulti g i a rioriti ed li t o olutio to el a ie e tate ide goal

e ollo i g goal ere ide tified a art o t e o erall CPS rogram

• i ro e t de i io ma i g a d i e tme t o ey orridor to trategi goal

• e elo olutio t at addre ide tified orridor eed a ed o mea ured er orma e

• Prioriti e im ro eme t t at o t e e ti ely re er e moder i e a d e a d tra ortatio i ra tru ture

1.3 Statewide overview and loCation

e orridor tudied alo g t e S total orridor mile a ro egme t i ludi g ter tate ited State ig ay route a d ri o a ig ay route e e orridor addre

dema d or riti al reig t eed a d or mo ility eed to a ommodate i ter ity tra el ommuti g a d or re reatio

1.4 Corridor CharaCteriStiCS

a i di idual orridor a u i ue regio al a d route ara teri ti Corridor ara teri ti ummarie are i luded i t e ollo i g li t or urt er detail o e ifi orridor lea e re ere e

t e i di idual CPS re ort

I-8: California State Line to I-10e Corridor ro ide ig ifi a t mo eme t or reig t ommuter a d re reatio eed

it i ri o a a d eyo d t ro ide ea t e t o e ti ity et ee e tral ri o a Ca a ra de uma a d out er Cali or ia Sa iego i u ed ea ily or t e tra ortatio

o agri ultural rodu t i tra tate i ter tate i ter atio al ommer ial di tri utio a d military tra ortatio e Corridor ro ide re reatio al o e ti ity to t e Colorado i er m erial Sa d u e e reatio al rea rga Pi e atio al o ume t u e ille Se i o order Cro i g a d urt er a e i to Sout er Cali or ia

I-10: California State line to SR 85 and SR 85: I-10 to I-8 (I-10 West) i ourt lo ge t ig ay i t e ou try e te di g rom Cali or ia to lorida it i

ri o a i re og i ed a a ey Commer e Corridor ro idi g ig ifi a t i ter atio al a d dome ti reig t mo ility e ea ter ortio o t e e t Corridor e erie e ig ifi a t

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP


I-40: I-17 to New Mexico State Line (I-40 East)e a t Corridor origi ated out o t e ormer S oute alig me t a d ro ide

o e ti ity et ee lag ta a d e e i o e a t e erie e ig ifi a t ommuter tra fi i t e lag ta area it t e i ter tate ei g a rimary route e a t Corridor o er re reatio al a d touri t o e ti ity to lag ta ra d Ca yo atio al

Par t e S o o l S i e ort Petrified ore t atio al Par a d Pai ted e ert atio al Monument.

SR 64: I-40 to Grand Canyon National Park e S Corridor i a ig ifi a t re reatio touri m a d regio al route or ort er ri o a i o e t e t o lag ta to t e ra d Ca yo atio al Par e ra d Ca yo

atio al Par i a ig ifi a t glo al attra tio au i g a re ue t i u o touri t tra el year rou d S i t e ole regio al route ro idi g lo al a d regio al tra fi et ee t e t ree o ulatio e ter dire tly alo g t e orridor illiam alle a d u aya

SR 68: SR 95 North to US 93 and SR 95 North: California State Line to Nevada State Line

e S Corridor ro ide regio al a d ur a o e ti ity or ort e ter ri o a a d ull ead City re e ti ely e S ortio o t e orridor i ituated alo g t e Cali or ia

a d e ada tate li e ad a e t to t e Colorado i er o e ti g eedle Cali or ia t roug ort o a e a d ull ead City to aug li e ada a d t e S ortio o t e orridor e S ortio o t e orridor tra el ea t e t rom aug li tra er e a ro t e la

ou tai t roug t e re ide tial area o olde alley a d termi ate alo g S ort e t o i gma S e erie e ig ifi a t ommuter a d regio al tra fi a a ma or regio al e o omi e ter dditio ally t ere i ig ifi a t ommuter tra fi et ee olde alley a d K ingman along SR 68.

SR 69: I-17 to SR 89; Fain Rd: SR 69 to SR 89A; SR 89A: Fain Rd to SR 89; SR 89: SR 89A to I-40

e S S S Corridor i rimarily a regio al route o e ti g ommu itie i e tral a a ai Cou ty to ot ort er a d e tral ri o a ma ority o t e tra fi olume

a ro t i orridor o ur et ee t e ur a i ed area o Pre ott Pre ott alley a d C i o alley er i g a rimary o e ti e route et ee t e e o ulatio lo atio o t egme t er e a ota le ommuter route or a a ai Cou ty a d S ro idi g a o e tio et ee greater Pre ott a d metro olita P oe i urt ermore t e ortio

o S a d S are la ified t roug t e State reig t Pla a a Criti al r a reig t Corridor a d Criti al ural reig t Corridor re e ti ely

SR 77: US 60 to SR 377e S Corridor i t e egme t o S tret i g et ee S o o a d ol roo i orridor ro ide trategi o e ti ity et ee S o o a d ol roo a ell a

t e e u de ig ated la e o aylor a d S o a e lo ated dire tly alo g t e orridor

Sig ifi a t reig t di tri utio i e erie ed rimarily alo g t e ort er ortio o t e orridor et ee S o a e a d ol roo e orridor e erie e it greate t olume et ee aylor a d S o a e due to regio al de e de e u o t i route

SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40e S S S Corridor i a im orta t tra el orridor or re reatio al touri t a d

regio al tra fi or e tral ort ea ter ri o a e S ortio o t e route et ee t e P oe i ur a i ed area a d Pay o e erie e ot t e greate t reig t a d ommuter tra fi olume o e er t e e tire S S S Corridor o er a ariety o re reatio al

a d touri t a e e i ludi g o to atio al ore t oo e elt a e a d Petrified ore t atio al Par

SR 90: I-10 to SR 80 and SR 80: SR 90 to US 191e S S Corridor i a re reatio al touri t reig t ro order a d regio al tra el

route a ro out ea ter ri o a i orridor li to t e ougla Port o try at t e e i o order tra eli g dire tly t roug t e ariou o ulatio e ter o Sierra i ta

e o i ee a d ougla a or tra fi ge erator out ide o t e orridor o ulatio e ter i lude t e ort ua u a S rmy i tallatio a d military i tellige e e ter a ell a art er Ca er State Par Coro ado atio al o ume t a d ot er re reatio

areas.

SR 95: I-8 to I-40e S Corridor i a im orta t ort out tra el orridor o t e e ter edge o t e

tate rimarily u ed or agri ultural military re reatio al touri t a d regio al tra fi S i a e e tial regio al route o e ti g a um er o mall ommu itie rimarily et ee

uma a d a e a a u City dditio ally t e S Corridor e erie e a ig olume o re reatio al a d touri t tra fi a e i g de ti atio i ludi g a e a a u State Par m erial Sa d u e e reatio al rea a d u i atio al Par

SR 179: I-17 to SR 89A; SR 89A: SR 179 to SR 260; and SR 260: SR 89A to I-17e S S a d S Corridor i a u a ed orridor egi i g a d e di g at ro i g t roug illage o a Cree Sedo a Cotto ood a d Cam erde i route

er e a a regio al o e tor et ee t e e o ulatio e ter a t a a alter ati e route to a d mo t ig ifi a tly er e a a ig ifi a t touri m orridor i a d out o Sedo a a d urrou di g tate ar a d re reatio area Sig ifi a t o ulatio gro t are ro e ted

amo g t t e o ulatio e ter t roug out t e orridor leadi g to a i rea i g de e de e on these routes.

SR 260: SR 277 to SR 73 and US 60: SR 260 to New Mexico State Linee S S Corridor o er t e route et ee e er ergaard t roug S o o

a d S ri ger ille to t e e e i o tate li e a ell a a e o d ro g o S t at egi i S o o a d o ti ue a t Pi eto a e ide termi ati g at S i orridor a ig ifi a t daily tra fi olume di aritie ra gi g a ig a e i le er day it i

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP


S o o to a lo a e i le er day et ee S ri ger ille a d t e e e i o tate li e t ro ide riti al reig t a d regio al o e ti ity et ee o ulatio e ter a ro t e route dditio ally t i orridor i a ma or ea t e t route to a multitude o re reatio ite i ludi g ou t aldy ilder e rea a d a e Sitgrea e atio al ore t

SR 347: I-10 to SR 84 and SR 84: SR 347 to I-8e S Corridor i a ort out orridor et ee a d a i g t roug t e ity

o ari o a i ort er Pi al Cou ty a d out er ari o a Cou ty e ort er egme t o t e route ro ide ig ifi a t regio al ommuter tra fi et ee t e ity o ari o a a d t e greater P oe i metro area i orridor e a le reig t a e to t e ity o ari o a a d al o er e a a o er i ed tru route y a i g ro imately al o t e orridor i lo ated it i t e C i or t e ila i er dia re er atio

US 60/US 70: SR 79 to US 191 and US 191: US 70 to SR 80e S S S Corridor i a im orta t tra el orridor or agri ulture mi i g

re reatio a d touri m a d er e a a ma or i ter atio al reig t route e S S S Corridor i a im orta t route or t e tra ort o agri ultural rodu t i t e ila i er alley a d or large ale mi i g o eratio ear Sa ord iami a d Su erior o t ommuter tra fi o ur et ee t e e o omi a d o ulatio e ter i ludi g Sa ord lo e a d Su erior dditio ally t e S S S Corridor e erie e re reatio al

a d touri t tra fi to o to a d Coro ado ore t a e old Ca i o a d e ort a d oy e om o r oretum a d State Par

US 89: Flagstaff to Utah State Linee S Corridor e te d et ee lag ta a d t e ta tate li e ort o Page i

route i t e ri o a ortio o t e e te i e S i e te d rom ri o a to t e SCa ada order ma ority o t i orridor i a rural t o la e u di ided ig ay a d er e a t e o ly ort out route t roug t e e tral ortio o ort er ri o a ortio o t e

S Corridor a ee ide tified to re ei e S t reig t e ifi u di g or reig t im ro eme t large ariatio o tra fi olume are ou d t roug out t e route it t e ig e t olume area o urri g i t e out er mo t egme t o t e orridor it i t e lag ta ur a i ed area erea t e remai der o t e route a limited tra fi olume it

mi imal de elo me t a d ommuti g tra el o urri g t roug out

US 93/US 60: Nevada State Line to SR 303Le S S Corridor i a im orta t tra el orridor or e tral ort ea ter ri o a

or re reatio touri t a d regio al tra fi S i de ig ated a a ortio o t e uture Corridor e S S Corridor ro ide ig ifi a t reig t o e ti ity et ee t e P oe i ur a i ed area i e urg i gma a d out er e ada e ommuter tra fi o ur rimarily et ee i e urg a d t e P oe i ur a i ed area e S S

Corridor ro ide re reatio al a d touri t a e to t e oo er am a d a e ead atio al e reatio rea

US 160: US 89 to New Mexico State Linee S Corridor i rimarily a rural t o la e u di ided ig ay t at ro e t roug t e

a a o atio a d o i ri e la d i ort er ri o a i ea t e t route er e a a regio al reig t route a ell a touri m a ed orridor ro idi g a e to u a City aye ta t e our Cor er a d t e a a o atio al o ume t e e tire orridor e erie e ery lo tra fi olume it u a City a d aye ta e erie i g t e ig e t olume rom lo al tra fi

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

8 10 11 15 17 19 40

60 64 70 89 93 95 160 163 180 191

24 51 61 64 66 67 68 69 71 72 73 74 75 77

78

92 95

8079 79BUSINESS

82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 9089A

96 97 98 99 101LOOP

143 169 177 179 181180A 186

187 188 189 195 210 238 260202LOOP

261 264 266 273 277 286

287 288 289 347 366 373 386 387 389 473 564 587303LOOP

1.5 Corridor Segmentation

a orridor a egme ted to allo or a a ro riate le el o detailed eed a aly i er orma e e aluatio a d om ari o et ee di ere t egme t Segme t ere determi ed at logi al rea

ere di ere e i ara teri ti u a terrai daily tra fi olume or road ay ty i al e tio ere ide tified Table 1 and Figure 3 re re e t ea orridor egme tatio


Table 1: Corridor Segmentation

Corridor Study BMP – EMP Total Corridor Length (miles) # of Segments

I-8 MP 0 – MP 178 178 9

I-10 W/SR 85 I-10: MP 0 – MP 113 SR 85: MP 155 – MP 123 153 14

I-10 E MP 160 – MP 392 232 16

I-17 MP 215 – MP 340 125 12

I-19 MP 0 – MP 63.7 63 6

I-40 W MP 0 – MP 196 196 14

I-40 E MP 196 – MP 360 164 12

SR 64 SR 64: MP 185 – MP 237 52 3

SR 68/SR 95 N SR 95: MP 226 – MP 250 SR 68: MP 0 – MP 27 51 7

SR 69/SR 89A/SR 89

SR 69: MP 263 – MP 296 Fain Rd: MP 331 – MP 324 SR 89A: MP 324 – MP 317 SR 89: MP 319 – MP 363

91 9

SR 77 SR 77: MP 342 – MP 385 43 4

SR 87/SR 260/SR 377

SR 87: MP 177 – MP 253 SR 260: MP 252 – MP 306 SR 277: MP 306 – MP 313

SR 377: MP 0 – MP 34 SR 77: MP 368 – MP 389 I-40B: MP 287 – MP 288

175 17

SR 90/SR 80 SR 90: MP 290 – MP 336 SR 80: MP 333 – MP 365 78 10

SR 95 MP 29 – MP 202 170 13

SR 179/SR 89A/SR 260SR 179: MP 299 – MP 314 SR 89A: MP 355 – MP 374

SR 260: 206 – MP 21946 6

SR 260/US 60 SR 260: MP 306 – MP 357 US 60: MP 340 – MP 402 112 9

SR 347/SR 84 SR 347: MP 162 – MP 189 SR 84: MP 155 – MP 162 34 5

US 60/US 70/US 191US 191: MP 0 – MP 121

US 70: 339 – 255 US 60: 255 – MP 212

214 17

US 89 US 89: MP 420 – MP 557 137 11

US 93/US 60 US 60 W: MP 138 – MP 111 US 94: MP 200 – MP 0 207 16

US 160 US 160: MP 311 – MP 470 159 12

21 Total Corridors 2, 680 Miles 221 Segments

Figure 3: Statewide Corridor Segmentation


2. 0 STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE & NEEDS

i a ter de ri e t e e i ti g er orma e e aluatio o t e tudied orridor erie o er orma e mea ure a u ed to a e ea orridor e re ult o t e er orma e e aluatio ere u ed to defi e orridor eed relati e to t e lo g term goal a d o e ti e or ea orridor

2.1 Corridor PerformanCe framework

e CPS ro e u e a er orma e a ed a roa to defi e a eli e orridor er orma e diag o e orridor eed de elo orridor olutio a d rioriti e trategi orridor i e tme t

u ort o t i o e ti e a rame or or t i a roa a de elo ed t roug a olla orati e ro e i ol i g a d t e CPS o ulta t team

Figure 4 illu trate t e er orma e rame or i i lude a t o tiered y tem o er orma e mea ure rimary a d e o dary t at e aluated a eli e er orma e e rimary mea ure i ea o fi e er orma e area ere u ed to defi e t e o erall ealt o ea orridor ile e o dary mea ure el ed to ide ti y lo atio t at arra ted urt er diag o ti i e tigatio to

delineate needs.

Table 2: Corridor Performance Measures

Performance Area Primary Measure Secondary Measures

PavementPavement Index

a ed o a om i atio o ter atio al oug e de a d ra i g

• ire tio al Pa eme t Ser i ea ility• Pavement Failure• Pa eme t ot S ot

Bridge

Bridge Index

a ed o lo e t o de u tru ture u er tru ture a d tru tural e aluatio

rating

• ridge Su fi ie y• u tio ally olete ridge• Bridge Rating• ridge ot S ot

MobilityMobility Index

a ed o om i atio o e i ti g a d uture daily olume to a a ity ratio

• Future Congestion • Pea Co ge tio • Travel Time Reliability• ultimodal ortu itie

SafetySafety Index

a ed o re ue y o atal a d i a a itati g i ury ra e

• ire tio al Sa ety de• Strategi ig ay Sa ety Pla m a i

Areas• Cra it y e• Sa ety ot S ot

FreightFreight Index

a ed o i dire tio al tru la i g time i de

• e urri g elay• o e urri g elay• Closure Duration• ridge erti al Cleara e• ridge erti al Cleara e ot S ot

a o t e rimary a d e o dary er orma e mea ure i om ri ed o o e or more ua tifia le i di ator t ree le el ale a de elo ed to ta dardi e t e er orma e ale a ro t e fi e er orma e area it umeri al t re old e ifi to ea er orma e mea ure

ood o e erage Per orma e ati g i a o e t e ide tified de ira le a erage ra ge

air erage Per orma e ati g i it i t e ide tified de ira le a erage ra ge

Poor elo erage Per orma e ati g i elo t e ide tified de ira le a erage ra ge

e term good air a d oor a ly to t e Pa eme t ridge o ility a d reig t er orma e mea ure i a e i di idually defi ed t re old e term a o e a erage a erage a d

elo a erage a ly to t e Sa ety er orma e mea ure i a e t re old re ere ed to statewide averages.

Table 2 ro ide t e om lete li t o rimary a d e o dary er orma e mea ure or ea o t e fi e er orma e area

e fi e er orma e area u ed i t e CPS rame or alig it t e atio al er orma e goal stated in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century P

• Sa ety

• ra tru ture Co ditio

• Co ge tio edu tio

• System Reliability

• reig t o eme t a d o omi itality

• edu ed Pro e t eli ery elay

Figure 4: Corridor Profile Performance Framework


2.3 Statewide Pavement

e Pa eme t er orma e area o i t o a rimary mea ure Pa eme t de a d t ree e o dary mea ure a o i Figure 7 e e mea ure a e t e o ditio o t e e i ti g a eme t alo g t e tudied orridor

2.2 Corridor needS aSSeSSment ProCeSS

e er orma e a ed eed a e me t e aluate t e di ere e et ee t e a eli e er orma e a d t e er orma e o e ti e or ea o t e fi e er orma e area u ed to ara teri e t e ealt o t e orridor Pa eme t ridge o ility Sa ety a d reig t e te y

te er orma e a ed eed a e me t ro e i illu trated i Figure 5.

e eed a e me t om are a eli e orridor er orma e it er orma e o e ti e to ro ide a tarti g oi t or t e ide tifi atio o er orma e eed i mat emati al om ari o

re ult i a i itial eed rati g o o e o edium or ig or ea rimary a d e o dary er orma e mea ure illu trati e e am le o t e ro e i o i Figure 6.

u e ue t te t e i itial le el o eed a refi ed to a ou t or re e t ro e t Ste o in Figure 5 a d t e a om o ite eed ore a al ulated or ea egme t a ed o all fi e er orma e area Ste o i Figure 5

Primary Pavement Indexe Pa eme t de i al ulated u i g t o a eme t o ditio rati g t e Pa eme t Ser i ea ility

ati g PS a d t e Pa eme t i tre de P

e PS i e tra ted rom t e ter atio al oug e de a mea ureme t o a eme t roug e a ed o field mea ured lo gitudi al road ay rofile e P i e tra ted rom t e Cra i g ati g C a field mea ured am le rom ea mile o ig ay

ot t e PS a d P u e a to ale it re re e ti g t e lo e t er orma e a d re re e ti g t e ig e t e Pa eme t de or ea egme t i a eig ted a erage o t e dire tio al rati g a ed o t e um er o tra el la e ere ore t e o ditio o a e tio it more tra el la e ill a e a greater i ue e o t e re ulti g egme t Pa eme t de t a t e o ditio o a e tio it e er tra el la e

a orridor egme t i rated o a ale it ot er egme t i imilar o erati g e iro me tTable 3 i lude t e a eme t i de ori g ra ge it i t e Pa eme t er orma e area t e

RE

SU

LTA

CT

ION

Compare Results ofPerformance System

to Performance Objectives

Revise Initial De�ciency to Address

Recent Projects,Historical MaintenanceIssues, and Data Issues

Perform “Drill-Down”Investigation of De�ciency

to IdentifyContributing Factors

Summarize De�ciencyon each Segment

Identify Overlappingand Common Needs

and Contributing factorsby Location

Initial Levels of De�ciency

(none, low, medium,high) by Performance

Area and Segment

Revised Levels of De�ciency

by Performance Areaand Segment

De�ciency Con�rmationand Identify

Contributing Causes

Numeric Level ofDe�ciency for each

Segment

ActionablePerformance-Based

Needs De�nedby Location

Initial DeficiencyIdentification

STEP 1SUPPORT TOOLSDeficiency

Assessment

STEP 2SUPPORT TOOLS Deficiency

Investigation

STEP 3Segment

Review

STEP 4Corridor

Needs

STEP 5

Figure 5: Needs Assessment Process

Figure 6: Initial Need Ratings in Relation to Baseline Performance (Bridge Example)

Performance Thresholds Performance Level Initial Level of Need Description

Good

None* ll le el o ood a d to o air Good

6.5 GoodFairFair Low iddle o air

5.0 Fair Medium o er o air a d to o Poor PoorPoor High o er o Poor Poor

*A segment need rating of ‘None’ does not indicate a lack of needed improvements; rather, it indicates that the seg‑ment performance score exceeds the established performance thresholds and strategic solutions for that segment will not be developed as part of this study.

Pavement Performance Area Pavement Index

Directional Pavement Directional Pavement Serviceability

Directional Pavement Directional Pavement ServiceabilityServiceability

Directional PSR

Pavement Serviceability

Pavement Distress (Cracking only)

Pavement FailurePavement Failure

% of pavement area above failure thresholds

for IRI or Cracking

Pavement Hot SpotsPavement Hot Spots

Map locations on Pavement Index and

Pavement Serviceability

Seco

ndar

y M

easu

res

Prim

ary

Mea

sure

Figure 7: Pavement Performance Measures


rele a t o erati g e iro me t are de ig ated a i ter tate a d o i ter tate egme t

ro all tudied orridor t e ollo i g o erati g e iro me t ere ide tified

• ter tate egme t mile

• o ter tate egme t mile

Table 3: Pavement Index Scoring Range

Performance Level

Pavement IndexInterstates Non-Interstates

GoodFair 3.2 - 3.75 2.9 - 3.5Poor

Secondary Pavement Measuresree e o dary mea ure ro ide a i de t e aluatio o t e di ere t ara teri ti o a eme t

er orma e

• ire tio al Pa eme t Ser i ea ility

• Pavement Failure

• Pa eme t ot S ot

Statewide Pavement Performance Resultse Pa eme t de ro ide a ig le el a e me t o t e a eme t o ditio or ea egme t

o t e tudied orridor e t ree e o dary mea ure ro ide more detailed i ormatio to a e a eme t er orma e

a ed o t e re ult o t i a aly i t e ollo i g o er atio ere made

• ly mile o t e a eme t i i oor o ditio

• mile o egme t a e good a eme t o ditio

• mile o egme t a e air a eme t o ditio

• o t e or t er ormi g egme t ere lo ated o t e S S Corridor

• o t e or t er ormi g egme t ere lo ated o t e Corridor

Table 4 o t e lo e t er ormi g a eme t egme t o t e tate ide y tem a ed o lo e t Pa eme t de ore om ared to t e egme t eed ore Figure 9 illustrates the tate ide a eme t er orma e re ult Pa eme t de a or ea e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix A e ull tate ide a eme t er orma e ta le i ludi g all e o dary

mea ure a e ou d i Appendix B.

Pavement Needs Refinement and Contributing Factors• ly o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g ig Pa eme t eed

• ly o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g edium Pa eme t eed

• e remai i g ere ide tified a a i g o or o e Pa eme t eed a d re e ti ely

Figure 8 illu trate t e a eme t eed di tri utio a ro all tudied orridor mile

Figure 10 illu trate t e re ulti g tate ide a eme t eed re er to Appendix C or t e om lete a eme t eed e re e e o a re e tly om leted ro e t u e ue tly u er edi g t e al ulated er orma e a re ult i a de rea ed le el o eed Co er ely t e re e e o a ot ot a re ult i a i rea ed le el o eed e er to Se tio i t e i di idual orridor re ort

to ide ti y ea orridor egme t o tri uti g a tor to ard eed ide tifi atio

75.7%GOOD

CONDITION

2.8%POOR

CONDITION

21.4%FAIR

CONDITION

Figure 8: Pavement Needs Distribution


Table 4: Lowest Performing Pavement Segments

Rank Segment # Route Milepost Range Length (miles) Pavement Index Score Pavement Need Score1 260-1 SR 260 306-310 4.33 1.89 High

2 277-14 SR 277 306-313 6.83 2.05 High3 8-2 I 8 16-21 5.1 2.31 None*4 80-7 SR 80 333-339 6 2.31 None*5 95-13 SR 95 190-202 12 2.77 None*6 40W-13 I 40 184-190 6 2.85 High7 260/60-4 SR 260/US 60 337-345 8 2.86 High8 64-1 SR 64 185-213 28 2.88 High9 89U-9 US 89 547-550 3 2.98 High

10 191-2 US 191 24-67 43 3.06 Low11 260-13 SR 260 304-306 2.05 3.11 Medium12 90-5 SR 90 317-324 6.79 3.14 Medium13 260-5 SR 260 341-357 16 3.15 Low14 60-7 US 60 352-384 32 3.19 Low15 40W-4 I 40 55-74 19 3.20 None*16 40W-6 I 40 80-98 18 3.20 Low17 60E-15 US 60 227-225 2 3.21 None*18 95N-2 SR 95 233-241 8 3.22 Medium19 77-16 SR 77 386-389 2.36 3.25 Medium20 40W-11 I 40 326-342 8 3.26 High

*A segment need rating of ‘None’ does not indicate a lack of needed improvements; rather, it indicates that the segment performance score exceeds the established performance thresholds and strategic solutions for that segment will not be developed as part of this study.

Recent pavement project reduced the need from High to None

Recent pavement project reduced the need from High to Low

Recent pavement project reduced the need from Medium to None/Low

need from High to None

Recent pavement project reduced the Recent pavement project reduced the need from Medium to None/Low

Recent pavement project reduced the


Figure 9: Statewide Pavement Performance Figure 10: Statewide Pavement Needs

A segment need rating of ‘None’ does not indicate a lack of needed improvements; rather, it indicates that the segment performance score exceeds the established performance thresholds and strategic solutions for that segment will not be developed as part of this study.


2.4 Statewide bridge

e ridge er orma e area o i t o a rimary mea ure ridge de a d our e o dary mea ure a o i Figure 11 e e mea ure a e t e o ditio o t e e i ti g ridge alo g ea tudied orridor ly ridge t at arry mai li e tra fi or ridge t at ro t e mai li e are i luded i t e al ulatio

Secondary Bridge Measuresour e o dary mea ure ro ide a i de t e aluatio o t e ara teri ti o ea ridge

• ridge Su fi ie y

• u tio ally olete ridge

• Bridge Rating

• ridge ot S ot

Statewide Bridge Performance Resultse ridge de ro ide a ig le el a e me t o t e tru tural o ditio o ridge or t e

orridor a d ea egme t e our e o dary mea ure ro ide more detailed i ormatio to a e ridge er orma e


• ridge are lo ated it i egme t it good ridge o ditio

• ridge are lo ated it i egme t it oor ridge o ditio

• ridge are lo ated it i egme t it air ridge o ditio

• ridge ere la ified a ot ot o all a e ed ridge

• o t e or t er ormi g egme t ere lo ated o o a d o

Table 6 o t e lo e t er ormi g ridge egme t o t e tate ide y tem a ed o lo e t ridge de ore om ared to t e egme t eed ore Figure 13 illustrates the statewide bridge er orma e re ult ridge de a or ea e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix

A e ull tate ide ridge er orma e ta le i ludi g all e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix B.

Primary Bridge Indexe ridge de i al ulated a ed o t e u e o our di ere t ridge o ditio rati g rom t e

ridge ata a e al o o a t e ri o a ridge ormatio a d Storage Sy tem SS e our rati g are t e e ati g Su tru ture ati g Su er tru ture ati g a d Stru tural aluatio ati g e e rati g are a ed o i e tio re ort a d e ta li t e tru tural

ade ua y o ea ridge e er orma e o ea i di idual ridge i e ta li ed y u i g t e lo e t o t e e our rati g e u e o t e e rati g a d t e u e o t e lo e t rati g i o i te t

it t e a roa u ed y t e ridge rou to a e t e eed or ridge re a ilitatio e ridge de i al ulated a a eig ted a erage or ea egme t a ed o de area Table 5

i lude t e ridge i de ori g ra ge

Table 5: Bridge Index Scoring RangePerformance Level Bridge Index

GoodFair 5.0-6.5Poor

20.7%GOOD

CONDITION

3.4%POOR

CONDITION

75.9%FAIR

CONDITION

Bridge Needs Refinement and Contributing Factors• ly o ridge alo g tudied orridor ere ide tified a a i g a ig eed

• o ridge alo g tudied orridor ere ide tified a a i g a edium eed

• e remai i g o ridge ere ide tified a a i g o or o e eed a d re e ti ely

Bridge Performance Area Bridge Index

Bridge SufficiencyBridge Sufficiency Functionally Obsolete Functionally Obsolete Bridges

Functionally Obsolete Functionally Obsolete BridgesBridges

Bridge Bridge Hot SpotsHot Spots

Map locations on Bridge Index and Bridge Sufficiency

Seco

ndar

y M

easu

res

Prim

ary

Mea

sure

Structural Evaluation Rating

Deck Rating

Superstructure Rating

Substructure Rating

Sufficiency Rating % deck area on Functionally Obsolete

Bridges

Bridge Bridge RRatingating

Lowest Bridge Rating on Segment

Figure 11: Bridge Performance Measures


• o ot ot ridge ere lo ated amo g t t e lo e t er ormi g ridge egme t ridge

• o ot ot ridge are lo ated it t e ig e t eed egme t ridge

• ly t o o t e lo e t er ormi g ridge egme t Segme t a d a e ad a redu tio i t e le el o eed re ulti g rom re e tly om leted ridge ro e t

Figure 12 illu trate t e ridge eed di tri utio a ro all tudied orridor ridge

Figure 14 illu trate t e re ulti g tate ide ridge eed re er to Appendix C or t e om lete ridge eed e re e e o a re e tly om leted ro e t u e ue tly u er edi g t e al ulated er orma e a re ult i a de rea ed le el o eed Co er ely t e re e e o a ot ot a

re ult i a i rea ed le el o eed e er to Se tio i t e i di idual orridor re ort to ide ti y ea orridor egme t o tri uti g a tor to ard eed ide tifi atio

Table 6: Lowest Performing Bridge Segments

Rank Segment # Route Milepost Range # of Bridges Bridge Index Score Bridge Need Score Bridge H otspots1 40W-1 I 40 0-11 4 3.66 High 12 95N-1 SR 95 226-233 1 4.00 High 13 89U-6 US 89 481-498 2 4.46 High 14 60E-14 US 60 243-227 5 4.56 High 45 10E-9 I 10 262-274 26 4.99 Medium 106 95-8 SR 95 131-142 1 5.00 Medium 17 95-3 SR 95 43-60 1 5.00 Medium -8 69-2 SR 69 280-287 1 5.00 Medium -9 179-1 SR 179 299-305 1 5.00 High -10 80-10 SR 80 357-365 1 5.00 Medium -11 95N-3 SR 95 241-250 1 5.00 High -12 160-10 US 160 434-451 1 5.00 High -13 160-1 US 160 311-319 1 5.00 Medium -14 60E-16 US 60 225-223 2 5.00 None* -15 85-12 SR 85 123-120 1 5.00 Medium -16 40E-3 I 40 212-234 11 5.03 Medium 517 40W-14 I 40 190-196 11 5.11 Medium 218 10W-1 I 10 0-16 5 5.11 Medium -19 40E-5 I 40 246-258 16 5.12 Low 820 40W-5 I 40 74-80 6 5.13 High 1


Recent bridge rehab project reduced the need from Medium to None

Recent bridge projects reduced the need from Medium to Low

reduced the need from Medium to

Figure 12: Bridge Needs Distribution


Figure 13: Statewide Bridge Performance Figure 14: Statewide Bridge Needs



2.5 Statewide mobility

e o ility er orma e area o i t o a rimary mea ure o ility de a d our e o dary mea ure a o i Figure 15 e e mea ure a e t e o ditio o e i ti g mo ility alo g t e tudied orridor

Primary Mobility Indexe o ility de i a a erage o t e e i ti g daily olume to a a ity C ratio a d

t e uture ri o a State ide ra el ema d odel daily C ratio or ea egme t o t e orridor e C ratio i a i di ator o t e le el o o ge tio i mea ure om are t e a erage a ual daily tra fi olume to t e a a ity o t e orridor egme t a defi ed y t e er i e olume or le el o er i e S y u i g t e a erage o t e e i ti g a d uture year daily olume t i i de mea ure t e le el o daily o ge tio ro e ted to o ur i a ro imately te

year i o a a ity im ro eme t are made to t e orridor

a orridor egme t i rated o a ale it ot er egme t i imilar o erati g e iro me t Table 7 i lude t e mo ility i de ori g ra ge it i t e o ility er orma e area t e rele a t o erati g e iro me t are ur a rural etti g a d i terru ted o e g ig ali ed at grade i ter e tio are re e t u i terru ted o e g o trolled a e grade e arated o ditio u a a ree ay or i ter tate ig ay

or all tudied orridor egme t t e ollo i g o erati g e iro me t ere ide tified

• r a or r a ri ge i terru ted lo Segme t mile

• ural i terru ted lo Segme t mile

• r a or r a ri ge terru ted lo Segme t mile

• ural terru ted lo Segme t mile

Table 7 o ility de S ori g a ge

Performance LevelMobility Index

Urban or Urban Fringe RuralGoodFair 0.71-0.89 0.56-0.76Poor

Secondary Mobility Measuresere are our e o dary mea ure t at ro ide a i de t e aluatio o o eratio al ara teri ti

o t e orridor

• Future Congestion – Future Daily V/C

• Pea Co ge tio i ti g Pea our C

• ra el ime elia ility ree e arate tra el time relia ility i di ator toget er ro ide a om re e i e i ture o o mu time may e re uired to tra el it i t e orridor

‑ Closure Extent

‑ Directional Travel Time Index (TTI)

‑ Directional Planning Time Index (PTI)

• ultimodal ortu itie ree multimodal o ortu ity i di ator re e t t e ara teri ti o t e orridor t at romote alter ate mode to t e i gle o u a y e i le S or tri alo g t e orridor

‑ % Bicycle Accommodation

‑ % Non‑SOV Trips

‑ % Transit Dependency

Mobility Performance Resultse o ility de ro ide a ig le el a e me t o mo ility o ditio or t e orridor a d or

ea egme t e our e o dary mea ure ro ide more detailed i ormatio to a e mo ility er orma e

Mobility Performance Area Mobility Index

Future Daily Volume-to-

Capacity Ratio

Existing Daily Volume-to-

Capacity Ratio

Future CongestionFuture Congestion

Future Daily Volume-to-Capacity Ratio

Travel Time ReliabilityTravel Time Reliability

Travel Time Index

Multimodal OpportunitiesMultimodal Opportunities

% Non-SOV Trips

% Transit Dependency

Peak CongestionPeak Congestion

Seco

ndar

y M

easu

res

Prim

ary

Mea

sure

Existing Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity

Ratio

Planning Time Index

Closure Extent % Bicycle Accommodation

AVERAGE

Figure 15: Mobility Performance Measures



• orridor mile are ro e ted to a e oor uture tra fi o eratio a ed u o t e Future Daily V/C measure.

• e lo ure e te t rate more t a dou le a d i rea e i ot re e ti e dire tio i re ue y it i mou tai ou o erati g e iro me t om ared to t e tate ide a erage

• ly o all orridor mile er ormed good or o S tri mea i g t at ma y e i le tri arry o ly a i gle o u a t

• ly o all orridor mile ad u fi ie t oulder idt or good er orma e or i y le a ommodatio

• a ed o t e eig ted a erage o t e o ility de ur a o erati g e iro me t er orm er e t or e t a t e tate ide a erage

• mile o egme t a e good mo ility o ditio

• mile o egme t a e air mo ility o ditio

• mile o egme t a e oor mo ility o ditio

• e t o or t er ormi g egme t are lo ated o S S Corridor i o e uti e egme t lo ated ear lo e

• e t ird a d ourt or t a d t ree o t e or t te er ormi g egme t are lo ated o t e S Corridor i o e uti e egme t lo ated ear ari o a

• o t e or t er ormi g egme t ere lo ated o t e Corridor

Table 8 o t e lo e t er ormi g mo ility egme t o t e tate ide y tem a ed o lo e t o ility de ore om ared to t e egme t eed ore Figure 17 illustrates the statewide

mo ility er orma e re ult o ility de a or ea e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix A e ull tate ide mo ility er orma e ta le i ludi g all e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix B.

Mobility Needs Refinement and Contributing Factors• ly o all tudied orridor ere ide tified a a i g ig o ility eed

• o all tudied orridor ere ide tified a a i g edium o ility eed

• e remai i g ere ide tified a a i g o or o e o ility eed a d re e ti ely

Figure 16 illu trate t e mo ility eed di tri utio a ro all tudied orridor mile

Figure 18 illu trate t e re ulti g tate ide mo ility eed re er to Appendix C or t e om lete li t o mo ility eed e re e e o a re e tly om leted ro e t u e ue tly u er edi g t e al ulated er orma e a re ult i a de rea ed le el o eed e er to Se tio i t e i di idual orridor re ort to ide ti y ea orridor egme t o tri uti g a tor to ard eed ide tifi atio

89.4%GOOD

CONDITION

3.9%POOR

CONDITION

6.7%FAIR

CONDITION

Figure 16: Mobility Needs Distribution


Table 8: Lowest Performing Mobility Segments

Rank Segment # Route Milepost Range Length (miles) Mobility Index Score Mobility Need Score1 60E-15 US 60 227-225 2 2.76 None*2 60E-14 US 60 243-227 16 1.73 Medium3 374-4 SR 374 176-190 8 1.47 High4 374-5 SR 375 184-189 5.38 1.35 High5 260-6 SR 260 209-219 9.53 1.22 High6 10E-8 I 10 255-262 7 1.13 High7 347-3 SR 247 171-176 5 1.03 High8 69-3 SR 69 287-296 9 1.02 High9 19-6 I 19 57-64 7 1.01 High

10 85-14 SR 85 120-123 3 1.01 High11 95N-3 SR 95 241-250 9 1.01 Low12 10E-7 I 10 246-255 9 1.00 High13 260-9 SR 260 256-260 3.48 0.94 High14 85-12 SR 85 123-120 3 0.92 High15 17-1 I 17 215-222 7 0.90 High16 95N-2 SR 95 233-241 8 0.89 High17 10E-1 I 10 160-164 4 0.87 Low18 10E-9 I 10 262-274 12 0.87 Medium19 89A-3 SR 89 374-369 4.55 0.86 High20 77-16 SR 77 386-389 2.36 0.85 High


Recent mobility project reduced the need from High to None/Medium

Recent roadway widening project reduced the need from Medium to Low

need from High to None/MediumRecent mobility project reduced the need from High to None/Medium


Figure 17: Statewide Mobility Performance Figure 18: Statewide Mobility Needs



2.6 Statewide Safety

e Sa ety er orma e area o i t o a rimary mea ure Sa ety de a d our e o dary mea ure a illu trated i igure ll mea ure relate to ra e t at re ult i atal a d i a a itati g i urie a t e e ty e o ra e are t e em a i o t e Strategi ig ay Sa ety Pla S SP ederal ig ay dmi i tratio a d P

Primary Safety Indexe Sa ety de i a ed o t e i dire tio al re ue y a d rate o atal a d i a a itati g i ury

ra e t e relati e o t o t o e ty e o ra e a d ra o urre e o imilar road ay i ri o a ordi g to ig ay Sa ety m ro eme t Program a ual atal ra e a e a e timated o t t at i time greater t a t e e timated o t o i a a itati g i ury ra e millio om ared to

a orridor egme t i rated o a ale y om ari g t e egme t ore it t e a erage tate ide ore or imilar o erati g e iro me t e au e ra re ue ie a d rate ary de e di g o

t e o erati g e iro me t o a arti ular road ay tate ide alue ere de elo ed or imilar o erati g e iro me t defi ed y u tio al la ifi atio ur a rural etti g um er o tra el la e a d tra fi olume Table 9 i lude t e a ety i de ori g ra ge

e ollo i g o erati g e iro me t ere ide tified a ro all tudied egme t

• or a e di ided ig ay Segme t mile

• or a e i ided ig ay Segme t mile

• or a e di ided ig ay Segme t mile

• or a e di ided ree ay ig ay Segme t mile

• ural a e ree ay it aily olume d Segme t mile

• ural a e ree ay it aily olume d Segme t mile

• r a a e ree ay Segme t mile

• r a or ural a e ree ay Segme t mile

• r a a e ree ay Segme t mile

Table 9: Safety Index Scoring Range

Similar Operating EnvironmentSafety Index

Good Fair Poor2 or 3 Lane Undivided Highway 0.94-1.06

2 or 3 or 4 Lane Divided Highway 0.77-1.234 or 5 Lane Undivided Highway 0.8-1.2

6 Lane Highway 0.56-1.44ural a e ree ay it aily olume 0.73-1.27ural a e ree ay it aily olume 0.68-1.32

Urban 4 Lane Freeway 0.79-1.21Urban or Rural 6 Lane Freeway 0.82-1.18

r a a e ree ay 0.8-1.2

Secondary Safety Measuresere are our e o dary mea ure t at ro ide a i de t e aluatio o t e di ere t ara teri ti o a ety er orma e

• ire tio al Sa ety de

• Cra it y e

• Sa ety ot S ot

• S SP m a i rea

‑ Speeding and aggressive driving

‑ Impaired driving

‑ Lack of restraint usage

‑ Lack of motorcycle helmet usage

‑ Distracted driving

Safety Performance Area Safety Index Comparison of Corridor

Segment Fatal and Incapacitating Injury (F+I)

Crashes to Similar Operating Environments

(SOEs) Statewide

SHSP Emphasis SHSP Emphasis AreasAreas

Comparison of Corridor Segment F+I Crashes to SOEs Statewide for Top Five Strategic Highway Safety Plan Emphasis Areas Behaviors: • Speeding/Aggressive Driving • Impaired Driving • Lack of Restraint Usage • Lack of Motorcycle Helmet

Usage • Distracted Driving

Safety Hot SpotsSafety Hot Spots

Concentration of Corridor F+I Crashes By Direction of Travel

Seco

ndar

y M

easu

res

Prim

ary

Mea

sure

Crash Unit TypesCrash Unit Types

Comparison of Corridor Segment F+I Crashes to SOEs Statewide for: • Motorcycles • Trucks • Non-motorized

travelers (pedestrians, bicyclists)

Directional Safety IndexDirectional Safety Index

Comparison of Corridor Segment F+I Crashes to SOEs Statewide By Direction of Travel

Figure 19: Safety Performance Measures


Safety Performance Resultse Sa ety de ro ide a ig le el a e me t o a ety er orma e or t e orridor a d or

ea egme t e our e o dary mea ure ro ide more detailed i ormatio to a e a ety er orma e

a ed o t e re ult o t i a aly i t e ollo i g o er atio ould e made

• mile o egme t a e a o e a erage a ety o ditio

• mile o egme t a e a erage a ety o ditio

• mile o egme t a e elo a erage a ety o ditio

• ro all orridor early al o all atal a d i a a itati g i ury ra e ere attri uta le to at lea t o e o t e fi e S SP em a i area

• a ed o t e eig ted a erage o t e Sa ety de ot ur a a d mou tai ou o erati g e iro me t er ormed ig ifi a tly oorer t a t e tate ide a erage a d re e ti ely

Table 10 o t e oore t er ormi g a ety egme t o t e tate ide y tem a ed o

oore t Sa ety de ore om ared to t e egme t eed ore Figure 21 illustrates the tate ide a ety er orma e re ult Sa ety de a or ea e o dary mea ure a e ou d i t e Appendix A e ull tate ide a ety er orma e ta le i ludi g all e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix B.

Safety Needs Refinement and Contributing Factors• o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g ig a ety eed

• o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g edium a ety eed

• e remai i g ere ide tified a a i g o or o e a ety eed a d re e ti ely

Figure 20 illu trate t e a ety eed di tri utio a ro all tudied orridor mile

Figure 22 illu trate t e re ulti g tate ide a ety eed re er to Appendix C or t e om lete li t o a ety eed e re e e o a re e tly om leted ro e t u e ue tly u er edi g t e al ulated er orma e a re ult i a de rea ed le el o eed Co er ely t e re e e o a ot ot a re ult i a i rea ed le el o eed e er to Se tio i t e i di idual orridor

re ort to ide ti y ea orridor egme t o tri uti g a tor to ard eed ide tifi atio

41.9%ABOV E

AV ERAGE

34.9%BELOW

AV ERAGE

21.0%AV ERAGE

Figure 20: Safety Needs Distribution


Table 10: Lowest Performing Safety Segments

Rank Segment # Route Milepost Range Length (miles) Safety Index Score Safety Need Score1 85-9 SR 85 155-149 6 4.55 High2 68-7 SR 68 22-27 5.11 4.12 High3 Fain-4 SR 69 331-324 7 3.97 High4 160-3 US 160 323-344 21 3.59 High5 60E-14 US 60 243-227 16 3.23 Medium6 68-6 SR 68 17-22 5 3.07 High7 87-1 SR 87 177-182 5.28 3.01 High8 68-5 SR 68 7-17 10 2.78 High9 10W-7 I 10 82-98 16 2.60 High

10 93-4 US 93 200-183 17 2.58 High11 93-11 US 93 71-67 4 2.55 High12 17-8 I 17 288-299 11 2.54 High13 89U-9 US 89 547-550 3 2.49 High14 95N-2 SR 95 233-241 8 2.38 High15 160-10 US 160 434-451 17 2.28 High16 95N-3 SR 95 241-5250 9 2.22 High17 89A/260-5 SR 89A/SR 260 356-209 3.89 2.22 High18 10E-10 I 10 274-280 6 2.21 High19 260-6 SR 260 209-219 9.53 2.19 High20 17-9 I 17 299-307 8 2.18 High

Recent safety project reduced the need from High to Medium


Figure 21: Statewide Safety Performance Figure 22: Statewide Safety Needs



2.7 Statewide freight

e reig t er orma e area o i t o a i gle rimary mea ure reig t de a d fi e e o dary mea ure a illu trated i Figure 23 ll mea ure related to t e relia ility o tru tra el

a mea ured y o er ed tru tra el time a d delay to tru tra el rom ree ay lo ure or y i al re tri tio to tru tra el

Primary Freight Indexe reig t de i a relia ility er orma e mea ure a ed o t e P or tru tra el e ru

Pla i g ime de P i t e ratio o t e t er e tile tru tra el time to t e ree o tru tra el time e P re e t t e e tra u er time eeded or o time deli ery ile a ou ti g or o re urri g delay o re urri g delay re er to u e e ted or a ormal delay due to lo ure

or re tri tio re ulti g rom ir um ta e u a ra e i leme t eat er a d o tru tio a ti itie

a orridor egme t i rated o a ale it ot er egme t i imilar o erati g e iro me t Table 11 i lude t e reig t i de ori g ra ge it i t e reig t er orma e area t e rele a t o erati g e iro me t are i terru ted o e g ig ali ed at grade i ter e tio are re e t a d u i terru ted o e g o trolled a e grade e arated o ditio u a a ree ay or i ter tate ig ay

e ollo i g o erati g e iro me t ere ide tified

• i terru ted lo Segme t mile

• terru ted lo Segme t mile

Table 11: Freight Index Scoring Range

Performance LevelFreight Index

Uninterrupted Flow Facilities Interrupted Flow FacilitiesGoodFair 0.67-0.77 0.17-0.33Poor

Secondary Freight Measurese reig t er orma e area i lude fi e e o dary mea ure t at ro ide a i de t e aluatio

o t e di ere t ara teri ti o reig t er orma e

• e urri g elay ire tio al ru ra el ime de

• o e urri g elay ire tio al P

• Closure Duration

• ridge erti al Cleara e

• ridge erti al Cleara e ot S ot

Freight Performance Resultse reig t de ro ide a ig le el a e me t o reig t mo ility or t e orridor a d or

ea egme t e fi e e o dary mea ure ro ide more detailed i ormatio to a e reig t er orma e


• mile a e good reig t i de

• mile o egme t a e oor rig t i de

• o t e or t er ormi g egme t are lo ated et ee ougla a d o S

• a ed o t e eig ted a erage o t e reig t de t e reig t mo ility er orma e o egme t o u di ided road ay er ormed ig ifi a tly oorer

• ere are ridge t at are la ified a ridge erti al leara e ot ot o all tudied orridor

Freight Performance Area Freight Index

Bi-Directional Truck Planning Time Index

Recurring DelayRecurring Delay

Directional Truck Travel Time Index

Bridge Vertical Bridge Vertical Clearance Hot SpotsClearance Hot SpotsClearance Hot Spots

Clearance < 16.25’ & No Ramp

Map on Bridge Vertical Clearance

Closure DurationClosure Duration

Directional Road Closure Duration

NonNon-Non-Recurring NonNon Recurring Recurring Recurring DelayRecurring Recurring DelayDelay

Directional Truck Planning Time

Index

Seco

ndar

y M

easu

res

Prim

ary

Mea

sure

Bridge Vertical Bridge Vertical Clearance

Bridge Vertical Bridge Vertical ClearanceClearance

Bridge Height

Figure 23: Freight Performance Measures


Table 12 o t e oore t er ormi g reig t egme t o t e tate ide y tem a ed o oore t reig t de ore om ared to t e egme t eed ore Figure 25 illustrates the tate ide reig t er orma e re ult reig t de a or ea e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix A e ull tate ide a ety er orma e ta le i ludi g all e o dary mea ure a e ou d i Appendix B.

Freight Needs Refinement and Contributing Factors• o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g ig reig t eed

• o all tudied orridor mile ere ide tified a a i g edium reig t eed

• e remai i g ere ide tified a a i g o or o e reig t eed a d re e ti ely

Figure 24 illu trate t e reig t eed di tri utio a ro all tudied orridor mile

Figure 26 illu trate t e re ulti g tate ide ridge eed re er to Appendix C or t e om lete li t o reig t eed e re e e o a re e tly om leted ro e t u e ue tly u er edi g t e al ulated er orma e a re ult i a de rea ed le el o eed Co er ely t e re e e o a ot ot a re ult i a i rea ed le el o eed e er to Se tio i t e i di idual orridor re ort

to ide ti y ea orridor egme t o tri uti g a tor to ard eed ide tifi atio

45.0%GOOD

CONDITION

26.2%POOR

CONDITION

28.8%FAIR

CONDITION

Figure 24: Freight Needs Distribution


Table 12: Lowest Performing Freight Segments

Rank Segment # Route Milepost Range Length (miles) Freight Index Score Freight Need Score

1 40B-17 SR 87/ US 260/SR 277/ SR 377 287-288 0.75 0.05 High

2 191-3 US 191 87-104 17 0.08 High3 191-2 US 191 24-67 43 0.09 High4 191-1 US 191 0-24 24 0.10 High5 347-3 SR 347 171-176 5 0.11 High6 347-4 SR 347 176-190 8 0.11 High7 95-4 SR 95 60-80 20 0.13 High8 89A/260-5 SR 89/SR 260 356-209 4 0.14 High9 95N-3 SR 95 241-250 9 0.14 High

10 347-5 SR 347 184-189 5 0.14 High11 60W-3 US 60 120-111 9 0.14 High12 85-13 SR 85 120-118 2 0.14 High13 260-8 SR 260 252-256 4.28 0.15 High14 89A-3 SR 89 374-369 5 0.15 High15 90-1 SR 90 290-295 5 0.16 High16 90-5 SR 90 317-324 7 0.17 High17 85-14 SR 85 120-123 3 0.17 High18 95-9 SR 95 142-148 6 0.18 High19 95-13 SR 95 190-202 12 0.19 High20 60/70-13 US 60/US 70 255-243 12 0.19 High

No need reduction as there are no recently completed freight projects


Figure 25: Statewide Freight Performance Figure 26: Statewide Freight Needs



2.8 Statewide PerformanCe Summary

a ed o t e re ult re e ted i t e re edi g e tio t e ollo i g ge eral o er atio ere made related to t e State ide Per orma e

• e erally tudied orridor a e ood a eme t er orma e it o ly i di idual dire tio al mile la ified a a eme t ot ot

• e erally tudied orridor a e air ridge er orma e it i di idual ridge la ified a ridge ot ot

• e erally tudied orridor a e ood mo ility er orma e it ery e i olated e e tio rimarily it i more ur a i ed orridor egme t

• e erally tudied orridor a e erage a ety er orma e it i di idual dire tio al mile la ified a a ety ot ot

• e erally tudied orridor a e air reig t er orma e it o ly ridge erti al leara e ot ot

Figure 27 o t e er e tage o all orridor mile ridge t at rate good a o e a erage aira erage or oor elo a erage or ea rimary mea ure

e o ility de a t e ig e t er ormi g mea ure it early o all tate ide orridor mile o i g good er orma e ore t a o all tate ide orridor mile o good er orma e or t e Pa eme t de o all orridor mile o good er orma e i reig t

ile o er a uarter o oor er orma e or t e Sa ety de a ro imately o orridor mile o a o e a erage er orma e ile t e ot er a d are o a a erage a d elo a erage er orma e re e ti ely ro imately o orridor ridge are er ormi g i good o ditio erea o er o orridor ridge re ei ed a air er orma e

rating.

e oore t er orma e t roug out tudied orridor ge erally o ur i t e Sa ety a d reig t Per orma e rea it t e Pa eme t a d o ility Per orma e rea o i g t e e t er orma e

2.9 Corridor needS Summary

Figure 27: Statewide Performance Summary by Primary Measure


e eed o ea er orma e area or ea egme t ere om i ed to umeri ally e timate t e a erage le el o eed or ea egme t o t e orridor eig ti g a tor o i a lied to t e eed

ore o t e er orma e area ide tified a em a i area or ea e ifi orridor e er to Se tio i t e i di idually om leted orridor re ort to ide ti y ea orridor em a i area

Table 13: H ighest Needs Segments

Segment # Route Milepost Range Length (miles) Pavement Need Bridge Need Mobility Need Safety Need Freight Need Average Need (0-3)

95N-3 SR 95 241-250 9 Low High High High High 2.5470/60E-13 US 70/ US 60 255-243 12 Low High Low High High 2.23

89-9 SR 89 348-363 15 Low High Low High High 2.23347-5 SR 347 184-189 5.38 Low None* High High High 2.2277-16 US 77 386-389 3 Medium Low High N/A# Medium 2.10

160-10 US 160 434-451 17 Low High Low High High 2.0817-1 I 17 215-222 7 None* Low High High Low 2.07

191-5 US 191 116-121 5 Medium None* Low High N/A# 2.0095N-2 SR 95 233-241 8 Medium None* High High Low 2.0010E-8 I 10 255-262 7 Low Low High Low High 1.9219-6 I 19 57 - 64 7 Low Low High High Low 1.92

40W-1 I 40 0-11 11 Low High Low High Low 1.9217-4 I 17 245-253 8 None* Medium Medium Medium High 1.87

89A-3 SR 89 374-369 4.55 None* None* High High High 1.8569-3 SR 69 287-296 9 None* None* High High Medium 1.85

60E-14 US 60 243-227 16 None* High Medium Medium Medium 1.8595-12 SR 95 176-190 14 Low Medium Low High Medium 1.8560W-3 US 60 120-111 9 None* None* Medium High High 1.85260-9 SR 260 256-260 4 None* None* High N/A# High 1.80

260/60-4 SR 260/ US 60 337-345 8 High None* Low Low Medium 1.77

*A segment need rating of ‘None’ does not indicate a lack of needed improvements; rather, it indicates that the segment performance score exceeds the established performance thresholds and strategic solutions for that segment will not be developed as part of this study. # N/A indicates insufficient or no data available to determine level of need.

ere are egme t mile it a o erall ig a erage eed egme t mile it a o erall edium a erage eed egme t mile it a o erall o a erage eed a d egme t mile it a o erall a erage eed o o e

Table 13 re er to t e o o erall ig e t a erage eed egme t a ro all tudied orridor dditio ally t e a erage eed o ea orridor egme t are o i Figure 28.


3. 0 STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS

e ri i al o e ti e o t e CPS i to ide ti y trategi olutio i e tme t t at are er orma ea ed to e ure t at a aila le u di g re our e are u ed to ma imi e t e er orma e o t e tate ey tra ortatio orridor e o t e fir t te i t e de elo me t o trategi olutio

i to ide ti y area o ele ated le el o eed i e edium or ig ddre i g area o edium or ig eed a e t e greate t e e t o orridor er orma e a d are t e o u o t e trategi olutio Segme t it edium or ig eed a d e ifi ot ot lo atio are o idered trategi i e tme t area or i trategi olutio ould e de elo ed Segme t it lo er

le el o eed or it out ide tified ot ot are ot o idered a didate or trategi i e tme t a d are e e ted to e addre ed t roug ot er rogrammi g ro e e

3.1 SCreening ProCeSS

i e tio e ami e uali yi g trategi eed a d determi e i t e eed i t o e lo atio re uire a tio ome a e eed t at are ide tified do ot ad a e to olutio de elo me t a d are ree ed out rom urt er o ideratio e au e t ey a e ee or ill e addre ed t roug ot er mea ure i ludi g

• ro e t i rogrammed to addre t i eed

• e eed i a re ult o a a eme t or ridge ot ot t at doe ot o i tori al i e tme t or rati g i ue t e e ot ot ill li ely e addre ed t roug ot er rogrammi g mea

• ridge i ot a ot ot ut i lo ated it i a egme t it a edium or ig le el o eed t i ridge ill li ely e addre ed t roug urre t ridge mai te a e a d re er atio rogrammi g ro e e

• e eed i determi ed to e o a tio a le i e a ot e addre ed t roug a ro e t

• e o ditio ara teri ti o t e lo atio a e a ged i e t e er orma e data a olle ted t at a u ed to ide ti y t e eed

e trategi eed ree i g ro e i illu trated i Figure 29 o i g t e te o urri g et ee t e ide tifi atio o ele ated eed lo atio a d t e determi atio o a didate olutio

lo atio

e ree i g ro e redu e t e to o erall ig e t a erage eed egme t i to total i di idual trategi i e tme t lo atio e er to Appendix D or t e om lete ummary o all orridor trategi i e tme t area ree i g

Figure 30 and Figure 31 di lay t e um er o ele ated eed lo atio e ore a d a ter t e ree i g ro e re e ti ely i orre o d to t e ide tified tate ide trategi i e tme t

areas.

Figure 28: Statewide Average Needs


3.2 Candidate SolutionS

or ea ele ated eed it i a trategi i e tme t area t at i ot ree ed out a a didate olutio a de elo ed to addre t e ide tified eed a a didate olutio a a ig ed to o e

o t e ollo i g t ree P P i e tme t ategorie a ed o t e o e o t e olutio

• Preservation

• Modernization

• a io

o ume ted er orma e eed er ed a t e ou datio or de elo i g a didate olutio or orridor re er atio moder i atio a d e a io Ca didate olutio ere ot i te ded to e a u titute or re la eme t or traditio al ro e t de elo me t ro e e i i ariou

te i al grou a d di tri t de elo a didate ro e t or o ideratio i t e er orma e a ed rogrammi g i t e P P ro e at er t e e a didate olutio ere i te ded to om leme t

traditio al ro e t de elo me t ro e e t roug a er orma e a ed ro e to addre eed i o e or more o t e fi e er orma e area o Pa eme t ridge o ility Sa ety a d reig t

Ca didate olutio de elo ed or all orridor re ort ill e o idered alo g it ot er a didate ro e t i t e tate ide rogrammi g ro e

e trategi lo atio ide tified rom t e ig e t eed egme t re ulted i a didate olutio ide tified at t e e lo atio due to ertai ro e t addre i g multi le eed dditio ally e eral ro e t ro ide multi le re omme datio o tio ll a didate olutio ere t e ad a ed i to

t e olutio e aluatio a d rioriti atio ro e

Figure 29: Strategic Needs Screening Process

Pre-SCreening Statewide StrategiC inveStment areaS (Figure 30)

PoSt-SCreening Statewide StrategiC inveStment areaS (Figure 31)


Figure 30: Pre-Screening Statewide Strategic Investment Areas Figure 31: Post-Screening Statewide Strategic Investment Areas


4. 0 SOLUTION EV ALUATION AND PRIORITIZ ATION OV ERV IEW

Ca didate olutio ere e aluated u i g t e ollo i g te i e Cy le Co t aly i CC ere a li a le Per orma e e ti e e aluatio Solutio i aly i a d Ca didate

Solutio Prioriti atio e met odology a d a roa to t i e aluatio are o i Figure 32 and de ri ed more ully elo e er to i di idual orridor re ort to ee t e ull olutio e aluatio a d rioriti atio ro e or ea orridor

Life-Cycle Cost Analysisll Pa eme t a d ridge a didate olutio a e t o o tio re a ilitatio re air or re o tru tio e e o tio ere e aluated t roug a CC to determi e t e e t a roa or ea lo atio ere a Pa eme t or ridge olutio a re omme ded e CC elimi ated o tio rom urt er

o ideratio a d ide tified i o tio ould e arried or ard or urt er e aluatio

ll o ility Sa ety a d reig t trategi i e tme t area t at re ulted i multi le i de e de t a didate olutio ere ot u e ted to a i e Cy le Co t aly i a d ere ad a ed dire tly to

t e Per orma e e ti e e aluatio

Performance Effectiveness Evaluationter om leti g t e CC ro e all remai i g a didate olutio ere e aluated a ed o t eir

er orma e e e ti e e i ro e i luded determi i g a Per orma e e ti e e S ore P S a ed o o mu ea olutio im a ted t e e i ti g er orma e a d eed ore or

ea egme t i e aluatio al o i luded a Per orma e rea i aly i to el di ere tiate et ee imilar olutio a ed o a tor t at ere ot dire tly addre ed i t e er orma e

system.

Performance Effectiveness Scoreor a didate olutio it multi le o tio to addre o ility Sa ety or reig t eed t e P S a om ared to el ide ti y t e e t er ormi g o tio o e o tio learly er ormed etter t a

t e ot er o tio e g more t a t i e t e P S alue a d a di ere e i mag itude o at lea t oi t t e ot er o tio ere elimi ated rom urt er o ideratio multi le o tio a e imilar

P S alue or t ere are ot er a tor ot a ou ted or i t e er orma e y tem t at ould ig ifi a tly i ue e t e ultimate ele tio o a o tio e g ote tial e iro me tal o er ote tial ad er e e o omi im a t t o e o tio ere all ad a ed to t e rioriti atio ro e

Solution Risk Analysisll a didate olutio t at ad a ed t roug t e Per orma e e ti e e aluatio ere al o

e aluated t roug a Solutio i aly i ro e olutio ri ro a ility a d o e ue e a aly i a o du ted to de elo a olutio le el ri eig ti g a tor i ri a aly i a a umeri ori g y tem to el addre t e ri o ot im leme ti g a olutio a ed o t e li eli ood a d e erity o er orma e ailure

Candidate Solution Prioritizatione P S eig ted ri a tor a d egme t a erage eed ore ere om i ed to reate a

rioriti atio ore e a didate olutio ere ra ed y rioriti atio ore rom ig e t to lo e t e ig e t rioriti atio ore i di ate t e a didate olutio t at i re omme ded a t e ig e t

riority Solutio t at addre multi le er orma e area te d to ore ig er i t i ro e

Figure 32: Candidate Solution Evaluation Process


5. 0 SUMMARY OF CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Prioritized reCommended SolutionS

Figure 33 o t e o ig e t ori g Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio Table 14 lists all Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio de elo ed a ro all tudied orridor i ra ed order o riority arger rioriti atio ore i di ate a didate olutio t at are re omme ded a ig er riority m leme tatio o t e e olutio i a ti i ated to im ro e t e er orma e o t e tate ide et or e ollo i g o er atio ere oted a out t e rioriti ed olutio

• ro e t ere ide tified a Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio t roug out all CPS

• ro imately illio o Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio ere ide tified throughout all CPSs.

• o t e ig e t ra i g olutio addre a a ety trategi i e tme t area

• ly fi e ro e t olely addre i g a eme t im ro eme t ere ide tified

• ly ro e t ide tified ridge re a ilitatio or re la eme t o ortu itie due to eit er mai li e erti al leara e limitatio a d or ridge o ditio ailure a d or defi ie ie

e Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio ere de elo ed o er t e our e o our rou d o CPS egi i g a early a e e olutio are a ed u o t e orridor eed re e ti g t e

mo t re e tly olle ted a d a aila le data at t e re e ti e date o om letio e Prioriti ed e omme ded Solutio do ot a ou t or a y u e ue tly de ig ed a d or o tru ted ro e t it i or ro imal to t e e tudy limit i di ated i t i re ort

5.2 other Corridor reCommendationS

art o t e i e tigatio o trategi i e tme t area a d a didate olutio ot er orridor re omme datio ere al o ide tified e e re omme datio i lude modifi atio to t e e i ti g State ide Co tru tio Program area or urt er tudy or ot er orridor e ifi re omme datio t at are ot related to o tru tio or oli y e er to Appendix E or t e om lete li t o ot er orridor re omme datio

233 RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS

Figure 33: Statewide Prioritize d Recommended Solutions


5.3 PoliCy and initiative reCommendationS

additio to lo atio e ifi eed ge eral orridor a d y tem ide eed ere al o ide tified t roug t e CPS ro e ile t e e eed are more o erar i g a d a ot e i di idually e aluated t roug t i ro e it i im orta t to do ume t t em li t o re omme ded oli ie a d i itiati e ere de elo ed or o ideratio e rogrammi g uture ro e t ere o ditio are a li a le t e re omme ded oli ie a d i itiati e ould e a lied a ro t e e tire tate ig ay y tem e ollo i g li t i o arti ular order o riority a deri ed rom t e ou d

Round 4 CPS:

• tall tellige t ra ortatio Sy tem S o duit it all e i ra tru ture ro e t

• Pre are trategi la or Clo ed Cir uit ele i io CC amera a d oad eat er ormatio Sy tem S lo atio tate ide

• e erage o er a d ommu i atio at e i ti g eig i motio dy ami me age ig S a d all o lo atio to e a d S a li atio a ro t e tate

• Co ider olar o er or lig ti g a d S ere a li a le

• e tigate i e ormatio redi tio te ology ere a li a le

• Co du t ig ay a ety ma ual e aluatio or all uture rogrammed ro e t

• e elo i ra tru ture mai te a e a d re er atio la i ludi g edule a d u di g or all a eme t a d ridge i ra tru ture re la eme t or e a io ro e t

• e elo ta dardi ed ridge mai te a e ro edure o di tri t a er orm routi e mai te a e or

• e ie i tori al rati g a d le el o re iou i e tme t duri g o i g o a eme t a d ridge ro e t a eme t lo atio t at arra t urt er i e tigatio o du t u ur a e

i e tigatio duri g ro e t o i g to determi e i ull re la eme t i arra ted

• or a eme t re a ilitatio ro e t e a e t e amou t le el o geote i al i e tigatio to addre i ue e ifi to t e aryi g o ditio alo g t e ro e t

• a d rogrammed a d uture a eme t ro e t a e e ary to i lude oulder

• a d media a le arrier guideli e to a ou t or a ety er orma e

• tall CC amera it all S

• lo atio it limited ommu i atio u e CC amera to ro ide till image rat er t a streaming video.

• e elo tate ide rogram or a eme t re la eme t

• tall additio al o ti uou erma e t ou t tatio alo g trategi orridor to e a e tra fi ou t data

• e re o tru tio or re a ilitatio a ti itie ill a e t e i ti g ridge erti al leara e t e dime io o t e e ridge erti al leara e ould e a mi imum o eet ere ea i le

• ll e or re o tru ted road ay oulder edge ad a e t to a u a ed ur a e ould e o tru ted it a Sa ety dge

• Colli io data o tri al la d may e i om lete or i o i te t additio al oordi atio or data o tri al la d i re uired to e ure ade uate re e tio o a ety i ue

• a d data olle tio de i e tate ide to mea ure reig t delay

• aluate a d a ommodate ote tial a ge i reig t a d good mo eme t tre d t at may re ult rom im ro eme t a d e a io to t e tate road ay et or

• t tra fi i ter a ge it e i ti g ommu i atio o e ti ity to t e C o ideratio ould e gi e to addi g t ermal dete tio amera or e i le dete tio it t e a a ility or

ro g ay e i le dete tio

• m ro ed e i le dete tio y tem a re omme ded y Sy tem e ology grou ould e de loyed at tra fi i ter a ge or im ro ed tra fi o trol

5.4 ConCluSionS

e a didate olutio re omme ded i t i tudy are ot i te ded to e a u titute or re la eme t or traditio al ro e t de elo me t ro e e at er t e e a didate olutio are i te ded to om leme t traditio al ro e t de elo me t ro e e t roug a er orma e a ed ro e to addre eed i o e or more o t e fi e er orma e area o Pa eme t ridge o ility

Sa ety a d reig t Ca didate olutio de elo ed i t e CPS Program ill e o idered alo g it ot er a didate ro e t i t e tate ide rogrammi g ro e

t i im orta t to ote t at t e a didate olutio are i te ded to re re e t trategi olutio to addre e i ti g er orma e eed related to t e Pa eme t ridge o ility Sa ety a d reig t er orma e area ere ore t e trategi olutio are ot i te ded to re lude re omme datio

related to t e ultimate i io or t e trategi tate ide orridor et or t at may a e ee defi ed i t e o te t o rior la i g tudie a d or de ig o e t re ort e omme datio rom u tudie are till rele a t to addre i g t e ultimate orridor et or o e ti e


Table 14: Statewide Prioritize d Recommended Solutions

Rank Candidate Solution # Option Candidate Solution Name Candidate Solution Scope Estimated Cost *

(millions)Investment Category

(P, M, or E) Prioritization

Score

1 CS93.4 A Wickenburg Ranch Area Safety Improvements (MP 198.5 – MP 190)

Install center rumble strips; install high visibility edge line striping; install high visibility signage; install raised pavement markers; add delineators. $0.95 M 838

2 CS347.5 Wild Horse Pass Area Safety Improvements (MP 184 – MP 189)

Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 184-189

Install advanced warning signal system with detectors and beacons in both directions at Riggs Road intersection (MP 185.3).

Construct traffic signal at Maricopa Road intersection (MP 187.5) and provide an advanced warning signal system with detectors and beacons (both directions) and widen intersection to provide dual southbound left-turn lanes.

Install intersection lighting at Maricopa Road intersection (MP 187.5).

$5.00 M 798.4

3 CS89A.2West Sedona Area Safety, Mobility, and Freight

Improvements (MP 370 – MP 374)

Construct continuous raised median between MP 370.5 and MP 374.0.

Implement signal communication, coordination and adaptive traffic control from Upper Red Rock Loop Rd (MP 369.6) to Airport Rd (MP 373.1), a total of 8 signals.

$4.86 M 749.7

4 CS95N.3Bullhead City Area Safety, Mobility, and Freight


Construct raised median from north of Bullhead Parkway South (MP 241.0) to Aviation Way (MP 249.5).

Implement signal coordination from Mohave Community College (MP 241.1) to Bullhead Parkway North (MP 249.8), a total of 18 signals

Improve signal visibility at Mohave Drive (MP 242.8) and Ramar Road (MP 244.9).

Construct SB right-turn lanes at Marina Blvd (MP 243.9) and Thunderstruck Drive (244.2).

Implement protected left-turn phasing at Hancock Road (MP 244.3).

Install sidewalk on the west side of SR 95, MP 241.0-241.7 and 242.2-242.8.

$10.40 M 747.8

5 CS89A/260.4 Cottonwood Area Safety and Freight Improvements (SR 89A MP 356 – SR 260 MP 209)

Install lighting and raised median at Rio Mesa Trail intersection, MP 207.2.

Improve signal visibility at Western Drive intersection, MP 208.8.

Construct continuous raised median, MP 208-209.

Implement signal communication, coordination and adaptive traffic control on SR 260 Zalesky Road (MP 356.3 on SR 89A) to Western Drive (MP 208.8 on SR 260), total (system could be extended to also include Cornville Road, MP 357.1 on SR 89A).

$2.88 M 602.4

6 CS69.5 Prescott Area Raised Median (MP 294.75 – MP 296) Install a raised median between MP 294.75 – MP 296. $1.12 M 491.23

Preservation (P), Modernization (M), exPansion (e)*Includes estimated preliminary engineering cost, design cost, right-of-way cost, and construction cost.





Score

7 CS95N.2 Fort Mohave Area Safety and Mobility Improvements (MP 234 – MP 241)

Implement signal coordination from Boundary Cone Road (MP 234.4) to Bullhead Parkway South (MP 240.7), a total of 9 signals.

Improve signal visibility at Boundary Cone Road (MP 234.4) and El Rodeo Drive (MP 237.4) intersections.

Construct raised median, sidewalks, curb and gutter, where not existing, from south of Lipan Blvd (MP 235.0) to Teller Lane (MP 237.1).

Provide continuous lighting on both sides of the roadway from south of Lipan Blvd (MP 235.0) through El Rodeo Drive (MP 237.4) and Valencia Road (MP 238.9) to Sterling Road (MP 239.5).

Construct traffic signal at Chaparral Road (MP 236.2).

Construct raised median, sidewalks, curb and gutter, where not existing, from Valencia Road (MP 238.9) to north of Bullhead Parkway South (MP 241.0).

Construct traffic signal at Corwin Road (MP 239.9).

$10.90 M 306.6

8 CS347.6Wild Horse Pass Area Mobility and Freight


Widen to the inside to provide a total of 6 lanes (3 in each direction) with a median concrete barrier.

Construct 1,200’ SB acceleration lane and lengthen SB deceleration lane to 300’ at Maricopa Road intersection (MP 187.5).

Construct 1,200’ NB/SB acceleration lanes and lengthen NB/SB deceleration lanes to 300’ at Riggs Road intersection (MP 185.3).

$42.10 E 299.45

9 CS60W.3 - South Wickenburg Area Safety Improvements (MP 115 – MP 114)

Install left side/median guardrails between MP 114-115.

Install speed feedback sign.

Install high visibility edge line striping.

$0.83 M 291

10 CS10E.10 - Casa Grande Safety Improvements (MP 184 – MP 190)

Enhance Delineation (delineators, high visibility edge line striping and RPMs).

Install Speed Feedback Signs (MP 184 and 190).

Install DMS (MP 190).

$1.5 M 268

11 CS87.6 - Rye Area Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 235 – MP 241)

Install advisory sign about approaching area with intersections (Deer Creek Drive [MP 237.6], Gisela Road [MP 239.5], two intersections in Rye [MP 240.5 and MP 240.9]).

Install reduced speed advisory sign on SR 87 (NB MP 240, SB MP 241).

Install speed feedback signs (NB MP 240, SB MP 241); on SR 188 approaching SR 87 add flashing beacons to WB stop sign.

$0.2 M 261

12 CS10E.18 - Marana Safety Improvements (MP 237 – MP 242)


Install Speed Feedback Signs (MP 240); install DMS (MP 240).$1.3 M 232

13 CS87.9 - Mazatzal Area Safety Improvements (MP 246 – MP 251) Widen shoulders SB MP 246.2-250.9. $2.3 M 216.44

14 CS87.1 - Salt River Area Safety Improvements (MP 177 – MP 182)

Install warning signs and chevrons on curved Salt River bridge approaches.

Install raised pavement markers along the outside edge line.

Install lighting at Oak St (MP 178.0), Center St (MP 179.1), Mesa Dr (MP 179.7) and Camelback Rd (MP 181.1).

Install raised concrete barrier in median on Salt River bridge and approaches (MP 177-177.5).

$4.7 M 211.69






Score

15 CS87.2 - Bush Highway Area Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 191 – MP 213)

Rehabilitate shoulders (NB/SB MP 194-205).

Install speed feedback signs (NB MP 206.5 and 207.7, NB/SB before curves and intersection with FR 68 [MP 209.6]).

Widen inside shoulders (SB MP 211-209).

$6.8 M 210

16 CS87.3 - Sunflower Area Safety Improvements (MP 213 – MP 235)

Install speed feedback signs and speed advisory warning signs with flashing beacons at curves (NB MP 213.2, 214.0, 217.8, 220.5, 224.5, 232.5; SB MP 231.0, 229.3, 221.0, 219.6, 216.0, 214.3).

Rehabilitate shoulders; widen inside shoulders (SB MP 228.5-226.0).

Install rock-fall mitigation (NB MP 214.2-214.6; SB MP 228.9-228.7, 228.5-228.0, 217.6-218.0).

$18.3 M 189.36

17 CS19.15 - Drexel/Irvington Ped Overpass Construct pedestrian overpass between Drexel and Irvington; construct 8’ barrier fencing Valencia to Ajo Way (east side) and between Drexel and Irvington Rd (west side). $2.25 M 188.36

18 CS17.3 - Black Canyon SB Safety (MP 245 – MP 251)

Enhance roadside design (replace guardrail). Install high visibility striping and delineators, raised pavement markers and rumble strips. Install chevrons on curves.

Excavate/grade cut slopes to improve sight distance. Install dynamic speed feedback system on southbound roadway (near MP 248 & MP 251).

$3.15 M 176.14

19 CS160.8 - Mexican Water Safety Improvement (MP 432 – MP 438)

Widen shoulder in both directions (includes pavement, minor earthwork, striping edge lines, RPMs, high visibility delineators, safety edge and rumble strips).

Install curve warning signs in both directions.

Install chevrons on curves (MP 432.5 to MP 433.5 and MP 434.5 to MP 435.5).

$4.14 M 174.53

20 CS260.10 - Payson Area Safety and Freight Improvements ( SR 87 MP 251 – SR 260 MP 253)

Implement signal coordination/adaptive control for six signals in Payson urban area (SR 87/SR 260 intersection, SR 260/Payson Village Center, SR 260/Manzanita Dr, SR 87/Main St, SR 87/Bonita St and SR 87/Green Valley Parkway [BIA101]).

Implement protected/permitted left-turn phasing at SR 87/Manzanita Dr intersection (NB and SB approaches) and provide advance signal advisory sign with flashing beacons WB on SR 260.

$0.4 M 171.00

21 60.8 US 60 Globe-Miami Safety Improvements (MP 244.5 – MP 251)

Install lighting.

Install speed feedback signs (MP 246 - 250).

Install warning signs with beacons in advance of SR 188 intersection.

$7.71 M 167.03

22 10E.22 Tucson Pedestrian Safety Improvements (MP 257 – MP 258)

Install Access Barrier Fence.

Install Pedestrian Bridge (MP 258).$3.00 M 166.00

23 85.12 A Buckeye Safety (MP 154 – MP 149)

Install chevrons on the I-10/SR 85 interchange ramps. Install intersection warning beacons on SR 85 at the intersection approaches for Broadway, Southern and Baseline Roads.

Install larger stop signs with flashing beacons along Broadway, Southern and Baseline Roads (both directions) at approaches to SR 85 intersection.

Project will include the construction of acceleration and decelerations lanes for cross traffic merging at Broadway and Southern Roads.

$2.13 M 164.21






Score

24 60W.1 Surprise Area Safety Improvements (MP 138 – MP 132)

Install lighting between 163rd Avenue and Loop 303.

Rehabilitate shoulders/rumble strips and install safety edge.

Improve signal visibility.

$4.14 M 164.00

25 260.11 Lion Springs Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 256 – MP 260)

Reconstruct to 4-lane divided highway (using the existing 2-lane road for one direction) [Design already programmed for FY 2021 in ADOT 5-year program]. $50.00 E 160.00

26 85.14 AButterfield Trail Widening

(MP 120 – MP 123)

Construct new general purpose lanes and a center left turn lane along Butterfield Trail between MP 120 (Jct. I-8) and MP 123 (Jct. SR 85). Project will convert existing 2 lane undivided facility to a 5 lane undivided facility including shoulder rehabilitation. $11.75 E 158.25

27 10E.28 B Vail Mobility and Safety Improvements (MP 274 – MP 286)

Widen inside shoulder in both directions.


Install Speed Feedback Signs (MP 184 and 190).

$15.50 M 157.00

28 93.5 B Joshua Tree Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 183 – MP 161.5)

Widen shoulder.

Install center and outside rumble strips.

Install safety edge.

$15.60 M 157.00

29 60.11 Waterfall Canyon Bridge (#328) (MP 229.5) Replace Bridge. $1.66 M 153.38

30 17.15 Rattlesnake Canyon Safety (MP 305 – MP 307)

Improve skid resistance (reconstruct pavement, increase super-elevation or mill and replace). Install high visibility striping and delineators, raised pavement markers and rumble strips. Install chevrons on curves. Install dynamic speed feedback system. Construct/extend northbound parallel entrance ramp at Stoneman Lake TI.

Install CCTV near MP 306.5.

$2.19 M 151.50

31 191.2 US191 Safford Safety Improvements (MP 117 – MP 121)

US 191/Armory Road Intersection: Install Warning Signs with Beacons, Improve Signal Visibility.

US 191/Discovery Park Intersection: Improve Signal Visibility, Install Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs.

US 191/Lone Star Intersection: Install Traffic Signal, Install Warning Signs with Beacons.

US 191/16th Street Intersection: Install Warning Signs with Beacons.

$0.64 M 150.93

32 160.3 Tonalea Safety Improvement (MP 331 – MP 341)



Install chevrons on curve (MP 336 to MP 336.5).

$7.87 M 143.97

33 347.3 Casa Blanca Area Safety Improvements (MP 176 – MP 184)

Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 176-184.

Install advanced warning signal system with detectors and beacons in both directions at Cement Plant intersection (MP 182.5) and lengthen NB deceleration lane to 300’.

$5.10 M 140.10

34 Fain.7 A Robert Rd Intersection Improvements (MP 324 – MP 324.5)

Install speed reduction signs with beacons. Additionally, improve the signal visibility of all signal heads and install an additional northbound left turn at the Robert Road intersection at MP 324.5. $0.18 M 139.59






Score

35 77.16 C

Holbrook Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (adjacent to SR 77) (MP 386 – MP 389)

*Additional Options A & B Advanced

Construct new roadway connection between SR 377/SR 77 and I-40/40B West TI (Exit 285) west of Holbrook; includes new bridge over the Little Colorado River and overpass at railroad crossing. $43.82 E 136.00

36 10E.23 East Tucson Pedestrian Safety Improvements (MP 262 – MP 264)


Install Pedestrian Bridge (MP 262).$2.80 M 133.00

37 260.15 Forest Lakes Area Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 282 – MP 304)

Widen shoulders.

Construct alternating passing lanes (varying locations for 11 miles of the segment).$56.48 M 129.68

38 60.4 Vernon Area Safety Improvements (MP 352 – MP 384)

Widen shoulders in both directions.

Install centerline rumble strips.

Construct right and left turn lanes at the intersection of US 60 and County Road 3330/3331 (MP 354.25).

Install curve warning signage (EB MP 366 and WB MP 368).

Install chevrons (EB MP 366.25-366.50 and WB MP 366.75-367).

Install dynamic weather warning beacons (EB MP 366 and WB MP 368).

$29.40 M 129.00

39 160.9 US 160/US 191 Intersection Improvement (MP 435 – MP 437)

Install eastbound acceleration lane at US 191 intersection (MP 434.8).

Install eastbound deceleration lane at US 191 intersection (MP 434.8).

Install westbound acceleration lane at US 191 intersection (MP 437.2).

Install lighting (solar powered LED) at US 191 intersections (MP 434.8 and MP 437.2).

$1.25 M 128.67

40 89U.1 Sunset Crater Safety Improvements (MP 428 – MP 432)

Install high visibility striping and delineators, reflective pavement markers and rumble strips in both directions.

Install chevrons on curve (MP 428.5 to 429, MP 431 to 431.5).$0.59 M 128.01

41 68N.5 A

Black Mountains Area Safety and Freight Improvements (cable barrier)

(MP 7 – MP 17) *Additional Option B Advanced

Install cable median barrier, MP 8.6-11.1.

Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 7.0-17.0.

Install speed feedback signs, EB MP 8.6 and WB MP 11.1.

Install curve warning signs with flashing beacons and chevrons (both directions), MPs 8.6-9.1 and 10.6-11.1.

$5.60 M 125.80

42 87.7 Ox Bow Estates Area Safety Improvements (MP 241 – MP 250)

Install speed feedback signs and speed advisory warning signs with flashing beacons at curves (SB MP 247, MP 245).

Implement variable speed limits MP 241-246 with new DMS and CCTV SB at MP 247 and new DMS and CCTV NB at MP 240.

Install RWIS at MP 245 with dynamic weather warning beacons.

$4.11 M 122.71






Score

43 Fain.6 Fain Rd Safety Improvements (MP 330 – MP 331)

Install roadway lighting along both directions of travel between MP 330.75 – MP 331.63.

Install southbound chevrons along the roadway curve between MP 331.25 – MP 331.5.

Install a southbound speed reduction warning sign with beacon at MP 331.

Install a northbound curve warning sign at MP 331.5.

$1.23 M 119.97

44 347.4 Casa Blanca Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 176 – MP 184)

Widen to the inside to provide a total of 6 lanes (3 in each direction) with a median concrete barrier.

Construct 1,200’ NB acceleration lane at Casa Blanca Road intersection (MP 178.4).

Widen NB and SB Gila River Bridges (MP 181.8).

Widen NB and SB Santa Cruz Wash Bridges (MP 178.3).

Widen NB and SB Santa Cruz Wash Bridges (MP 176.2).

$78.60 E 118.20

45 40.5 Flagstaff Pedestrian Improvements (MP 198 – MP 200)

Install access barrier fence (8-ft fencing) along the residential section of the roadway between mileposts (MP’s) 198 and 200. The project includes construction of a grade separated pedestrian crossing, including ramps and sidewalks leading to the structure. $2.82 M 115.06

46 68N.4 Sunridge Area Safety Improvements (MP 0 – MP 7)

Improve delineation in both directions (striping, delineators and RPMs), MP 0.0-1.3.

Install curve warning signs and chevrons (both directions), MPs 0.6-0.9, 4.1-4.6 and 6.5-6.9.


Construct raised median, MP 2.1-2.6.

Install lighting (both directions), MP 2.1-3.0.

$5.10 M 113.80

47 60.6 Pinal Creek Bridge (#36) (MP 249.8) Replace Bridge. $2.35 M 108.72

48 19.14 Tucson Area GP Widening (MP 57 – MP 62) Construct new general purpose lane (inside) in NB/SB direction between Irvington Rd and San Xavier Rd. $33.43 E 106.21

49 60.12 AUS 60 Superior to Miami Widen Shoulder

(MP 227 – MP 243) *Additional Options B & C Advanced

Widen Shoulders (EB MP 227.0 to 227.6, EB MP 227.7 to 228.3, EB MP 228.5 to 232, WB 238.0 to 239.5).

Install Rock-Fall Mitigation (WB MP 227.7 to 228, WB MP 233 to 233.3, WB MP 240.2 to 240.4, WB MP 239.5 to 239.45, WB MP 239.6 to 239.75), dynamic weather warning beacons and RWIS.

*Note: Queen Creek Tunnel limits omitted from solution (MP 228.3 – 228.5).

$8.38 M 105.79

50 60.14 US 60 Queen Creek Safety Improvements (MP 227 – MP 229) Widen Shoulders; Install Warning Signs, Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs, Centerline Rumble Strip, Guardrail (EB and WB). $3.22 M 105.57

51 69.4 Prescott Area Widening (MP 290.5 - MP 294.75) Convert existing roadway to a 6 lane divided urban facility with a raised median and curb and gutter between MP 290.5 – MP 294.75. 23.74 E 101






Score

52 160.6 Shonto Safety Improvement (MP 346 - MP 362)


Install lighting (solar powered LED) at SR 98 intersection (MP 361.6).


Install chevrons on curve (MP 358 to MP 359).

14.57 M 101

53 89U.3 B North Cameron Safety Improvements (MP 467 - MP 475)


Construct southbound passing lane from MP 467.5 – 468.5.

Widen shoulder in both directions (MP 469.5 - 471, MP 471.5 - 472.5, MP 474.5 - 475.5) (includes pavement, minor earthwork, striping edge lines, RPMs, high visibility delineators, safety edge and rumble strips).

7.92 M 100

54 17.4 Sunset Point (MP 252 - MP 253)

Construct/ extend parallel northbound and southbound exit ramps at Sunset Point TI.

Install roadway weather information systems (RWIS).

Install dynamic wind warning system.

2.31 M 99

55 95.13 BLake Havasu City Safety and Freight Improvements

(MP177 - MP 190) *Additional Option A Advanced

Construct southbound right turn lanes at Smoketree Ave, Swanson Ave, W Acoma Blvd, Lake Dry.

Install raised median throughout City limits (MP 177 – MP 186).

Implement signal coordination/adjust timing; mitigate differential settling on Falls Spring Wash Bridge (MP 186.2).

13.45 M 98

56 60.13 US 60 Top-of-the-World Safety Improvements (MP 232 - MP 234) Install Warning Signs, Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs, High Visibility Edge Line Striping, Centerline Rumble Strip. 0.20 M 97

57 40.8 Walnut Canyon & Cosnino TI Lighting (MP 204.5 - MP 207.5)

Install offset solar powered LED lighting at Walnut Canyon TI (MP 205) and Cosnino TI (MP 207).

Includes light poles, luminaires and solar panels. 0.99 M 96

58 10E.8 Casa Grande EB Shoulder Widening (MP 183 - MP 184) Widen inside shoulder in the eastbound direction 0.60 M 96

58 10E.37 Page Ranch Road Safety Improvements (MP 354 - MP 358)


Install Speed Feedback Signs (MP 256).


1.70 M 96

60 90.3 San Pedro River Area Safety Improvements (MP 324 - MP 336)

Widen shoulders to 8 feet in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 324-336

Install centerline rumble strips, MP 324-336.9.80 M 95

61 60.7 Pinal Creek Bridge (#226) (MP 249.64) Replace Bridge. 3.10 M 95






Score

62 89U.6 Waterhole Canyon Safety Improvements (MP 534 - MP 547)

Install guardrail in both directions (MP 537.5 to 538).

Widen shoulder in both directions (MP 537 to 547) (includes pavement, minor earthwork, striping edge lines, RPMs, high visibility delineators, safety edge and rumble strips).


Install chevrons on curve (MP 537.5 to 538).

11.45 M 92

63 40.3 Flagstaff Safety Improvements (MP 196 - MP 200)

Rehabilitate shoulder and widen the inside shoulder. Implement variable speed limits using a wireless ground mount construction.

Install in-lane route pavement markings for the westbound I-40/I-17 interchange.

Install a Roadside Weather Information System (RWIS), a closed circuit television (CCTV) camera near the existing DMS at MP 199.6 Eastbound, and rock-fall mitigation (wire mesh) near MP 199.

10.11 M 91

64 179.1 SR 179 Hillside Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 313 - MP 314)

Expand Schnebly Hill Road roundabout to 2 lanes (MP 313.1).

Widen to 4 lanes between Schnebly Hill Road (MP 313.0) roundabout and SR 179/SR 89A roundabout (the “Y”) (MP 313.4).

Construct a pedestrian tunnel or bridge at Tlaquepaque, replacing the existing crosswalk.

Construct separated right-turn lane towards SB SR 179 and separated right-turn lane towards Uptown at SR 179/SR 89A roundabout (the “Y”) (MP 313.4).

13.33 E 90

65 19.6 Sahuarita to Tucson Shoulder Rehab (MP 39.5 - MP 64) Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions from Sahuarita Rd to Irvington Rd. 13.79 M 89

66 77.1 B

Show Low to Shumway Area Safety Improvements (Concrete Barrier)

(MP347 - MP 351) *Additional Options A & C Advanced

Concrete barrier (MP 347 – 351).

Widen (inside) shoulder (MP 347 – 351).

Install curve warning signage (NB MP 350 and SB MP 351).

Install chevrons (MP 350.45 – 350.6).

10.10 M 84

67 40.6 Butler TI Safety (MP 198.5 - MP 199.5)

Construct or extend parallel entrance and exit ramps at Butler TI at MP 199.

Includes pavement, striping, signing, RPMs, lighting, minor earthwork and drainage.4.43 M 81

68 80.5 Banning Creek Area Freight Improvements (MP 333 - MP 339) Widen shoulders to 8 feet in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 333-339. 4.01 M 81

69 40.4 Flagstaff Lighting (MP 196 - MP 202)

Install offset lighting along I-40 between MP’s 196 and 202 by connecting to existing power. This includes light poles, luminaires, pull boxes, conduit and conductors. 8.06 M 79

70 95.3 Dome Valley Area Safety Improvements (MP 39 - MP 42)

Widen shoulders (NB/SB); install chevrons at horizontal curve from MP 40.1 to 40.4.

Install warning signs for intersections with Adair Park Rd (MP 39.7) and County 3rd St (MP 40.5).3.34 M 79

71 347.2 Maricopa Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 174 - MP 176)

Widen to the inside to provide a total of 6 lanes (3 in each direction) with a raised median; for NB, widening limits are MP 174.8-176; for SB, widening limits are MP 175.5-176. 6.50 E 78

72 95.16 Lake Havasu City to I-40 Freight Improvements (MP 194 - MP 198)

Widen shoulders (NB/SB) MP 194.5 – MP 196.0.

Construct alternating passing lanes MP 196 – MP 198.9.63 M 78






Score

73 60.3 Show Low Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 345 - MP 352)

Widen shoulders in both directions.

Add passing lane in EB direction (MP 349-350).

Add passing lane in WB direction (MP 350-351).

12.70 M 76

74 347.1 Ak-Chin Area Safety Improvements (MP 162 - MP 171)

Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions (striping, delineators, RPMs, safety edge and rumble strips for both shoulders), MP 162-165 and MP 168-171.

Improve delineation (striping, delineators and RPMs), MP 165-168.

3.70 M 76

75 95.2 Fortuna Wash Area Safety Improvements (MP 35 - MP 39)

Install two-way center turn lane (expand from a 2-lane undivided highway to a 5-lane highway).

Widen bridge over canal Welton Mohawk Canal Bridge (MP 38.0).17.17 M/E 75

76 69.3 Prescott Valley Area Widening (MP 287 - MP 289.75) Convert existing roadway to a 6 lane divided urban facility with a raised median and curb and gutter between MP 287 – MP 289.75. 14.39 E 75

77 90.1 AHuachuca City Area Safety Improvements

(MP 313 - MP 317) *Additional Option B Advanced

Install raised median, MP 313-314.

Install centerline rumble strips, MP 314-317.0.92 M 74

78 19.1 Nogales to Tubac Shoulder Improvements (MP 3 - MP 30) Rehabilitate shoulders in both directions from the SR189 TI to Aravaca Rd TI. 15.19 M 74

79 89.12 Forest Area Safety Improvements (MP 350.5 - MP 352.5)

Replace asphalt concrete, including over-excavation between MP 351 – MP 351.5 and rehabilitate asphalt concrete between MP 350.5 – MP 351 and MP 351.5 – MP 352.5.

Additionally, install centerline rumble strips between MP 350.5 – MP 352.5.

3.14 P 74

80 17.14 Hog Tank Canyon Safety (MP 300 - MP 302)

Improve skid resistance (reconstruct pavement, increase super-elevation or mill and replace).

Install high visibility striping and delineators, raised pavement markers and rumble strips.

Install chevrons on curves.

Install dynamic speed feedback system. Excavate/grade cut slopes to improve sight distance.

4.03 M 74

81 95.12Bill Williams River Bridge to Lake Havasu City Safety

and Freight Improvements (MP 162 - MP 176)

Widen shoulders in both the northbound and southbound direction(NB/SB).

Construct alternating passing lanes at MP 172.8 – MP 177 and MP 164 – MP 169.8.

Install curve warning signs, advisory speed sign and chevrons at MP 162.3.

54.35 M 71

82 89U.5 Waterhole Canyon Freight Improvements (MP 531 - MP 535)

Construct northbound passing lane from MP 534.5 - 535.5

Construct southbound passing lane from MP 531.5 - 5339.32 M 71

83 89A.3Page Springs Road Intersection Area Safety

Improvements (MP 356 - MP 369)

Intersection reconstruction, MP 362.5 (Page Springs Road).


Install chevrons, curve warning signs with beacons and speed reduced ahead signs, MP 368.2-369.0.

Install speed feedback signs approaching curves, SB MP 369 and NB MP 368.

Install chevrons and curve warning signs with beacons either side of curve at MP 366.

7.95 M 69






Score

84 89U.7 Page Intersections Safety Improvement (MP 547 - MP 549)

Construct single-lane roundabouts at Lake Powell Boulevard intersections MP 547.2 and 548.5.

Install raised median from MP 547.2 to 548.5. 11.02 M 69

85 60.9 US 60 Pinal SPRR UP (No. 0562) Freight Mitigation (MP 253.4 - MP 253.8) Re-profile roadway to achieve 16.5 feet vertical clearance. 0.61 M 67

86 85.13 N Gila Bend GP Lanes (MP 120 - MP 123)

Construct 2 Southbound general purpose lanes west of the existing alignment to create a 4-lane divided highway between MP 123 and Maricopa Road.

The existing alignment will become 2 Northbound general purpose lanes.

As part of this project, access to the airport on the east side of SR 85 will need to be reconfigured.

30.07 E 65

87 40W.3 Stateline to SR 95 Safety Improvements (MP 0 - MP 11) Rehabilitate shoulders (includes new striping, delineators, raised pavement markers, safety edge and rumble strips). 6.19 M 64

88 17.11 McGuireville Rest Area Safety (MP 295 - MP 299)




Install dynamic speed feedback system near MP 297 and MP 299.

Install CCTV on existing DMS located at MP 297.4.

4.66 M 63

89 40.7 East Flagstaff Safety (MP 200 - MP 207)

Improve skid resistance from MP 200 to 202 by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install chevrons and curve warning signs from MP 200 to 202.

Rehabilitate shoulder and widen the inside shoulder.

Implement variable speed limits using a wireless ground-mount construction.

19.21 M 62

90 69.2 North of Poland Junction Area Safety Improvements (MP 275 - MP 277.25)

Widen the inside shoulder including striping edge lines, raised pavement markers, high-visibility delineators, safety edge and rumble strips between MP 275 – MP 277.25.

Install a westbound curve warning sign at MP 275 and an eastbound curve warning sign at MP 277.25.

2.87 M 62

91 95.10 Parker Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 142 - MP 148)

Construct right turn lanes at Riverside Drive (MP 148.3, NB and SB), Cove Avenue (MP 148.2, NB and SB), Ironwood Road (MP 147.5, SB) and Mesquite Drive (MP 147.3, SB).

Improve signal visibility and install warning signs and transverse rumble strips north of Resort Drive to alert southbound traffic.

2.85 M 61

92 40.9 Winona Safety (MP 207 - MP 212)

Improve skid resistance from MP 207 to 208 and from MP 210 to 212 by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install chevrons and curve warning signs from MP 207 to 208 and from MP 210 to 212.


Implement variable speed limits using a wireless ground-mount construction.

Install RWIS and a new eastbound Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) near MP 212.1 with attached CCTV nearby.

21.29 M 59






Score

93 95.9 A Bouse Wash to Parker Freight Improvements (MP 142 - MP 148)

Widen shoulders (NB/SB).

Construct drainage structure and re-profile roadway at MP 134.4. 14.76 M 59

94 10E.21 B

Tucson Mobility, Safety, and Freight Improvements: General Purpose Lane

(MP 248 - MP 252) *Additional Options A & C Advanced

Construct Auxiliary Lane.

Widen four bridges. 31.80 E 59

95 40W.17 Ash Fork to Williams Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 143 - MP 160)

Rehabilitate shoulders (includes new striping, delineators, raised pavement markers, safety edge and rumble strips).

Implement Variable Speed Limits (VSL) at EB/WB MP 151-159 and integrate with existing RWIS at MP 154 and MP 159 and existing DMS at EB MP 144 and with new DMS at WB MP 160.

30.27 M 58

96 60.10 Queen Creek Bridge (#406) (MP 227.71) Replace Bridge. 8.78 M 58

97 70.4 US 70 San Carlos Safety Improvements (MP 268 - MP 292)

Install Centerline Rumble Strip (MP 268-292), Warning Signs with Beacons (MP 278.5, 280, 292), Warning Signs (MP 269, 273), Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs (MP 268, 273, 278.5, 280, 292).

Widen Shoulders (MP 270-292).

Formalize Pullouts (WB MP 274.5, EB MP 279, EB MP 289, WB 292).

Construct Passing Lane (WB MP 282-288 and EB 262-264).

57.67 M 57

98 10E.24 C

East Tucson Mobility, Safety, and Freight Improvements: General Purpose Lane (I-10, MP 262-274)

(MP 262 - MP 274) *Additional Options A & B Advanced

Implement Ramp Metering at eight TIs.

Widen inside shoulder in both directions.

Install Speed Feedback Sign (MP 268).


17.00 M 56

99 40.25 Lupton East Safety (MP 351 - MP 360) Rehabilitate shoulder. 3.38 M 55

100 160.1 West Tuba City Widening (MP 319 - MP 321.6) Convert 2-Lane undivided highway to a 5-Lane highway. 10.19 E 55

101 95.1 Yuma Area Safety Improvements (MP 29 - MP 34)

Install two-way center turn lane (MP 29 – 32 expands from a 4-lane undivided highway to a 5-lane undivided highway, MP 32 – 34 expands from a 2-lane undivided highway to a 5-lane undivided highway).

Install raised medians at signalized intersection approaches (approximately 250’ on each approach).

Improve signal visibility and install warning signs at the following intersections: Araby Road (MP 29.4), Avenue 7E (MP 29.9), Avenue 8E (MP 30.9), Avenue 11E (MP 33.7).

Widen Gila Canal Bridge (MP 33.55).

15.41 M/E 54

102 89U.2 Antelope Hills Safety Improvements (MP 436 - MP 440)


Install chevrons on southbound curve (MP 438.75 to 439).

Install roadway lighting in both directions (MP 436 to 439).

4.54 M 53






Score

103 95.4 A

Yuma Proving Ground Area Safety and Freight Improvements


Widen shoulders (NB/SB). 30.39 M 52

104 17.6 Orme Rd Safety (MP 269 - MP 274)




Install dynamic speed feedback system near MP 272 & 274.

4.72 M 52

105 160.2 East Tuba City Widening (MP 322.4 - MP 325)

Convert 2-Lane undivided highway to a 5-Lane highway.

Install lighting (connecting to existing power) in both directions. 13.68 E 52

106 93.11 Windy Point Safety Improvements (MP 58 - MP 28)

Widen shoulders.

Install rumble strip.


41.97 M 49

107 10W.5 Vicksburg Safety (MP 32 - MP 50)

Rehabilitate the outside shoulder including mill and replace pavement, rumble strips, raised pavement markers and necessary striping from MP 32 to 50 in both EB and WB directions.

Project will also include the installation of CCTV cameras at the existing EB and WB DMS at MP 49.4.

10.13 M 49

108 90.2 Sierra Vista Area Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 317 - MP 324)

Implement signal coordination for 3 signals from Hatfield St/Buffalo Soldier Trail intersection (MP 317.2) to Coronado Dr (MP 319.6) and for 6 signals from Campus Dr (MP 321.0) to Colonia De Salud (MP 323.0).

Install speed feedback and signal ahead signs, MP 318 EB and MP 320 WB.

Install centerline rumble strips, MP 317.2-320.8.


2.92 M 47

109 19.12 Tucson Area Ramps (MP 57 - MP 62)

Modify entry/exit ramps to parallel configuration.

Implement ramp metering at Irvington Rd SB, Valencia Rd NB/SB and San Xavier Rd NB. 13.94 M 47

110 10E.17 APinal Air Park TI OP (#771) Bridge Vertical Clearance

Mitigation: Replace Bridge (MP 232.02)

Replace bridge with new bridge that provides 16.5’ of vertical clearance. 2.80 M 46

111 10E.20 Marana Pedestrian Safety Improvements (MP 237 - MP 242)


Construct Pedestrian Bridge (MP 238). 3.60 M 44

111 10E.33 Dragoon Safety Improvements (MP 317 - MP 318)


Install Speed Feedback Signs (MP 317).


0.80 M 44

113 17.2 ABlack Canyon Hill NB Climbing Lane


Construct northbound climbing lane.

Replace southbound Bumble Bee Rd Bridge.47.57 M 41






Score

114 10E.19 Marana Lighting Improvements (MP 237 - MP 242) Install lighting in both directions for five miles. 6.70 M 39

115 10E.7 A

Seed Farm Road UP (#1216) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Replace Bridge

(MP 179.37) *Additional Option B Advanced

Replace bridge with new bridge that provides 16.5’ bridge vertical clearance. 2.90 M 36

116 10E.03 B

Goodyear Road UP (#1149) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline

(MP 169.85) *Additional Option A Advanced

Reprofile mainline to be 5.3” lower to provide 16.5’ bridge vertical clearance. 0.80 M 34

117 10W.8 Vicksburg to PV Lighting (MP 54 - MP 103) Install lighting at EB and WB interchange merge points at MP 54, 69, 81, 98, 103 to improve visibility. 2.49 M 34

118 10E.6 B

Gas Line Road UP (#1215) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline



119 17.8 Middle Verde Safety (MP 290 -MP 293)



Install chevrons on curves. Install dynamic speed feedback system near MP 291 & MP 293.

Install CCTV near existing DMS located at MP 289.

3.77 M 32

120 10E.4 B

Nelson Road UP (#1213) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline



120 10E.5 C

Casa Blanca TI UP (#1214) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline

(MP 175.81) *Additional Options A & B Advanced


122 89.9 Del Rio Safety Improvements (MP 333.4 - MP 335.9)

Install centerline rumble strips, high-visibility delineators, high-visibility edge line striping and raised pavement markers between MP 333.4 and 335.9.

Additionally, install a southbound right turn lane and center left turn lane at Little Ranch Road (MP 335.8).

0.90 M 32

123 19.13 Tucson Area Variable Speed Limits (MP 57 - MP 64) Implement Variable Speed Limits (both directions). 25.00 M 31






Score

124 40.24 Lupton West Safety (MP 345 - MP 351)

Improve skid resistance from MP 345 to 346, MP 346.5 to 347 and MP 349.5 to 350.5 by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install striping, pavement markers, delineators, rumble strips, chevrons and curve warning signs from MP 345 to 346, MP 346.5 to 347 and MP 349.5 to 350.5.

Install dynamic speed feedback systems near MP 345 eastbound and MP 351 westbound.

Install a dynamic wind warning system near MP 349-350 and RWIS near MP 349-350.

10.03 M 31

125 40.10 Country Club & Walnut Canyon TI Safety (MP 201.5 - MP 205.5)

Construct or extend parallel entrance and exit ramps at Country Club TI (MP 202) and Walnut Canyon TI (MP 205).


126 95.6 Quartzsite to Bouse Wash Freight Improvements (MP 111 - MP 131)

Widen shoulders (NB/SB).

Construct drainage structures and re-profile roadway at 19 locations with flooding potential: MP 110.8, 112.8, 113.1, 114.9, 115.1, 116.2, 116.6 are higher priority with upstream channelization concentrating flows; MP 117.1, 117.7, 118.9, 119.6, 119.8, 120.1, 120.6, 120.8, 121.4, 122.1, 122.3, 122.6 are additional locations.

51.85 M 29

127 40W.9 Kingman Area Safety Improvements (MP 43 - MP 55)


Install median cable barrier at MP 47-51.

Implement VSL at EB/WB MP 47-53 and integrate with existing DMS at EB MP 45 and WB MP 55.

28.98 M 28

128 10W.9 Tonopah to PV Safety (MP 82 - MP 112)

Widen the outside shoulder including mill and replace pavement, rumble strips, raised pavement markers and necessary striping from MP 82 to 112 in both EB and WB directions.

Project will include the installation of dynamic speed feedback signs at EB MP 85 and WB MP 110.

In addition, a CCTV camera will be installed at the existing DMS at MP 110.

38.30 M 26

129 40.17 East Winslow Safety (MP 258 - MP 266)

Improve skid resistance from MP 258 to 260 by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install dynamic speed feedback systems near MP 258 eastbound and MP 260 westbound.

Install a CCTV camera near the existing DMS located at MP 260.2 WB. Rehabilitate shoulder.

10.24 M 25

130 10E.2 Riggs Rd to Casa Grande General Purpose Lane (MP 163 - MP 176)

Construct New General Purpose Lane.

Widen one bridge.141.40 E 25

131 68N.7 East Golden Valley Area Safety Improvements (MP 22 - MP 27)


Construct double-lane roundabouts at the following locations: Adobe Road (MP 22.8), Aztec Road (MP 23.8) and Bacobi Road (MP 24.8).

Provide lighting at Adobe Road intersection, and from MP 23.7-24.9 and MP 25.3-26.7.

19.80 M 24

132 40W.5 Illavar Wash EB Bridge #1310 - Replacement (MP 18.3) Replace bridge. 1.20 M 24

133 10E.30 Mescal EB Climbing Lane (MP 293 - MP 296) Construct eastbound climbing lane. 11.20 E 22






Score

134 68N.6West Golden Valley Area Safety and Freight

Improvements (MP 17 - MP 22)

Construct indirect left-turn improvements at Egar Road (MP 16.8) and Estrella Road (MP 17.8) with a raised median in between.

Construct left-in only raised median improvements at Milky Way Road (MP 18.7).

Construct indirect left-turn improvement with a raised median at Teddy Roosevelt Road (MP 19.8).

Construct double-lane roundabouts at Colorado Road (MP 20.8) and Verde Road (MP 21.8) with a raised median, MP 20.8-22.0.

Provide lighting at major intersections (6 total including Egar, Estrella, Milky Way, Teddy Roosevelt, Colorado and Verde), MP 16.8-22.0.

20.20 M 22

135 40.13 Canyon Diablo Middle (MP 220 - MP 229)


Install RWIS and dynamic wind warning system near MP 222-223.11.55 M 21

136 40W.1 Colorado River Bridge #957 (MP 0)

Continue coordinating with Caltrans for programming Colorado River Bridge deck replacement; Cost reflects ADOT’s anticipated share of costs. 55.00 M 19

137 40W.7 Griffith Wash WB Bridge #1658 - Replacement (MP 40.42) Replace bridge. 1.99 M 19

138 64.1Williams to Valle Freight and

Pavement Improvements (MP 185.5 - MP 205)

Construct EB climbing lanes, MP 196-198 and MP 203-205.

Construct WB climbing lane, MP 200-202.

Pavement Preservation EB and WB, MP 185.5 - 205.

34.80 P/M 19

139 10W.7 Centennial Safety (MP 54 - MP 71)

Widen the outside shoulder including mill and replace, rumble strips, raised pavement markers and necessary striping from MP 54 to 71 in both EB and WB directions.

Project will include the installation of dynamic weather warning beacons at MP 66, 68, 70, 76, 78 and 80 as well as RWIS at MP 70 and 77.

22.82 M 19

140 40W.15 Anvil Rock Rd TI UP Bridge # 1610 - Replacement (MP 108.65) Replace bridge. 2.79 M 18

141 10E.11 B

Val Vista Boulevard UP (#1151) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline



142 40W.19 Williams Area Safety Improvements (MP 160 - MP 168)


Implement VSL at EB/WB MP 161-163 and integrate with existing RWIS at MP 159 and existing DMS at WB MP 168 and with new DMS at EB MP 160.

12.27 M 18

143 347.7SR 347/I-10 Interchange Mobility and Freight

Improvements (MP 189)

Convert SR 347/I-10 traffic interchange from conventional diamond to diverging diamond interchange. 5.70 M 18

144 17.1 Table Mesa Rd TI (MP 235.5 - MP 236.5) Re-profile southbound roadway. 2.41 M 18






Score

145 70.5 US 70 Cutter Safety Improvements (MP 257 - MP 260) Install Lighting and Center Turn Lane. 2.99 M 17

146 40W.6 Flat Top Wash WB Bridge #1312 - Replacement (MP 21.01) Replace bridge. 2.03 M 17

147 10E.12 A

Cottonwood Lane UP (#1154) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Replace Bridge



147 10E.27 East Tucson Lighting Improvements (MP 263 - MP 274) Install lighting in both directions for 11 miles. 14.80 M 17

149 40W.14 Jolly Road Area Safety Improvements (MP 98 - MP 108)

Rehabilitate shoulder (includes new striping, delineators, raised pavement markers, safety edge and rumble strips).

Implement VSL at EB/WB MP 101-104 and integrate with new RWIS at MP 103 and new DMS at EB MP 100 and WB MP 105.14.54 M 17

150 95N.1 A

Arizona Village Area Safety and Mobility Improvements (widen and median) (MP 226 - MP 227)

*Additional Option B Advanced

Convert to a 4-lane highway with raised median, Colorado River Bridge (MP 226.1) to Courtwright Road (MP 227.3). 5.90 E 17

151 19.3 Nogales to Tubac Lighting (MP 3 - MP 30) Install lighting (both directions). 36.25 M 16

152 40W.4 Franconia Wash WB Bridge #377 - Replacement (MP 13.61) Replace bridge. 2.32 M 16

153 19.5 Sahuarita to Tucson Lighting (MP 39.5 - MP 60) Install lighting (both directions). 27.52 M 16

154 260.2 Pinetop Area Mobility and Freight Improvements (MP 341 - MP 355) Add a through lane in both EB and WB directions (MP 341-355.05). 122.70 E 15

155 160.5 Tonalea – Tuba City: Westbound Passing Lane (MP 340 - MP 343)

Construct westbound passing lane from MP 340 – MP 341.

Construct westbound passing lane from MP 342 – MP 343.7.46 M 14

156 10E.1 Wild Horse Pass to SR 587 Lighting Improvements (MP 163 - MP 176) Install lighting in both directions for 13 miles. 17.50 M 14

156 10E.13 B

Battaglia Road UP (#943) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline



158 10W.10 355th Ave Vertical Clearance (MP 101.4) Re-profile mainline I-10 to increase vertical clearance under the 355th Avenue overpass. 0.48 M 14






Score

159 10E.14 B

Alsdorf Road UP (#944) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline



160 19.10 Pima Mine TI (MP 49.6) Modify entry/exit ramps to parallel configuration. 5.60 M 13

161 17.5 Badger Springs Climbing Lane (MP 256 - MP 260) Construct northbound climbing lane. 14.90 M 12

162 8.9 AChuichu Rd UP (#1197) Reprofile


Re-profile roadway to achieve 16.5 feet vertical clearance. 0.87 M 12

163 260.13 Mogollon Rim Area Freight Improvements (MP 277 - MP 282)

Install centerline rumble strips.

Install rock-fall mitigation (WB MP 278.4-278.6, 279.8-280.9, 281.4-282.0).

Install RWIS at MP 282 with dynamic weather warning beacons.

Implement variable speed limits at MP 277-282 and new DMS and CCTV at MP 282 WB.

9.52 M 12

164 17.12 SR 179 TI (MP 298.5 - MP 299) Construct/extend parallel southbound entrance and northbound exit ramps at SR179 TI. 2.22 M 12

165 95.5 Yuma Proving Ground Freight Improvements (MP 59 - MP 71)

Construct drainage structures and re-profile roadway at 10 locations where flows are concentrated by upstream channelization (MP 59 – MP 60 three crossings, MP 61.0, MP 62.4, MP 66.0, MP 66.8, MP 69.1-69.3 two crossings, MP 71.3). 10.74 M 12

166 40.14 Twin Arrows TI Safety (MP 219.5 - MP 220.5)

Construct or extend parallel entrance and exit ramps at Twin Arrows TI (MP 220).


167 40.12 Canyon Diablo West Curves (MP 218 - MP 220)

For the entire length of the project (MP 218 – 220) improve skid resistance by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install chevrons and curve warning signs.

Install a dynamic speed feedback system near MP 218 eastbound and MP 220 westbound.

7.07 M 11

168 17.10 Dry Beaver Creek NB Climbing Lane (MP 294 - MP 298) Construct northbound climbing lane. 14.90 M 11

169 17.13 Hog Tank Canyon Climbing Lane (MP 299 - MP 305)

Construct northbound climbing lane.

Install new DMS at MP 303.4 with CCTV. 22.37 M 11

170 60.5 Vernon Area Freight Improvements (MP 367 - MP 383)

Construct EB climbing lane (MP 367-368).

Construct WB climbing lane (MP 380-381).

Construct EB climbing lane (MP 382-383).

11.20 M 11






Score

170 93.7 BCane Springs Safety Improvements

(MP 106 - MP 109) *Additional Option A Advanced

Widen shoulder.

Install center and outside rumble strips.


Install speed feedback signs.

9.41 M 11

172 260.12 Christopher Creek Area Freight Improvements (MP 260 - MP 277)

Install rock-fall mitigation (WB MP 262.2-262.6, 261.6-261.9, 269.0-269.1, 269.7-269.8, 271.3-271.5; EB MP 269.8-269.9, 272.6-272.7).

Implement variable speed limits at MP 272-277 and new DMS and CCTV at MP 272 EB. 7.16 M 11

173 160.7 Tsegi Canyon Passing Lanes (MP 389 - MP 391)

Construct westbound passing lane from MP 389 – MP 390.

Construct eastbound passing lane from MP 390 – MP 391. 7.46 M 11

174 93.9 Kingman Area Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 71 - MP 67) Install northbound climbing lane MP 71 to SR 68 TI. 22.62 M 10

174 10E.9 Casa Grande Lighting Improvements (MP 183 - MP 184) Install lighting in both directions for one mile. 9.40 M 10

176 87.4 Sunflower Area Freight Improvements (MP 213 - MP 223)

Construct NB climbing lane, MP 213-215 and MP 219-223.

Widen Whiskey Springs Bridge, #2515 MP 220.32.

Widen Upper Kitty Joe Bridge, #2497 MP 221.39.

43.35 M 10

177 87.5 Slate Creek Pavement Improvements (MP 224 - MP 226) Replace Pavement. 7.19 M 9

178 89.10 Bramble Drive Roundabout (MP 338.55 - MP 339.05) Construct a double-lane roundabout, including intersection lighting, at Bramble Drive (MP 338.5). 4.48 M 9

179 64.2 Valle Area Freight Improvements (MP 221 - MP 224)

Construct EB climbing lane, MP 223-224.

Construct WB climbing lane, MP 221-222. 7.50 M 9

179 10E.38 Exit 355 Lighting Improvements (MP 355) Install 12 (four per ramp) solar power LED lights at exit 355. 0.20 M 9

181 17.16 Red Hill Scenic Overlook Safety (MP 309 - MP 313)



Install dynamic speed feedback system near MP 311 and MP 313.

Install CCTV near MP 312.3.

7.17 M 9

182 8.8 AThornton Rd TI UP (#1196) Bridge Rehab & Reprofile


Rehabilitate the bridge. 2.91 M 8

183 10E.29 Vail Lighting Improvements (MP 275 - MP 279) Install lighting in both directions for four miles. 0.60 M 8






Score

184 89.8 AChino Valley Safety Improvements


Install a raised median between MP 327 and MP 329.

Additionally, construct a traffic signal and install intersection lighting at Road 1 N (MP 327.7).

Construct a double-lane roundabout at Road 2 N in place of existing traffic signal (MP 328.2).

8.72 M 8

185 8.10 Wellton-Mohawk Safety Improvements (MP 22 - MP 56)

Speed Feedback Signs (EB MP 28, EB MP 40, EB MP 45, EB MP 53.75, WB MP 23, WB MP 31.5, WB MP 44, WB MP 56.5).

Install Lighting (WB MP 25-25.49, WB MP 27.5-27.99, WB MP 32-33, WB MP 35 - 35.49, EB MP 26 - 26.49, WB MP 45.5-45.99).2.81 M 8

186 95.17 I-40 Approach Freight Improvements (MP 201 - MP 202)

Construct auxiliary lanes to create a 5-lane section through activity center (MP 201.3 – MP 202).

Install signs prohibiting left turns in/out of the northern Wendy’s/Pilot driveway.3.16 E 8

187 160.4 Tuba City – Tonalea: Eastbound Passing Lane (MP 335 - MP 336.5) Construct eastbound passing lane from MP 335 – MP 336.5. 5.59 M 8

188 40W.8 SR 95 to Kingman Safety Improvements (MP 11 - MP 43)


Provide signs for driver information (advance notice of rest area).18.03 M 8

189 40.26 Lupton TI’s Safety (MP 348 - MP 359)

Construct or extend parallel entrance and exit ramps at Houck TI (MP 348), Lupton TI (MP 359) and Westbound Rest Area (MP 359).


190 93.6 ABurro Creek Safety and Freight Improvements


Widen northbound shoulders.

Increase northbound clear zones.

Add northbound guardrails.

Install northbound speed feedback sign.

Re-profile northbound roadway at MP 148.

2.37 M 7

190 10E.36 A

Airport Road UP (#1114) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Replace Bridge



192 10W.11 I-10/SR85 Jct. Ramps (MP 112 - MP 113) Modify existing EB/WB entry and exit ramps to a parallel configuration. 4.43 M 7

193 40W.11 Kingman to US 93 Safety and Freight Improvements (MP 58 - MP 71) Implement VSL at EB/WB MP 58-71 and integrate with existing DMS at EB MP 69 and with new DMS at EB MP 55 and WB MP 72. 47.70 M 7

194 10W.3 US 60 TI Safety (MP 27 - MP 31)

Improve skid resistance of pavement between MP 27 and 31 in both EB and WB directions.

Project will include the installation of chevrons throughout the curve between MP 28 and 29.5 in both directions as well as dynamic speed feedback signs at the approaches to the curve (EB MP 27 and WB MP 31).

13.73 M 7

195 17.7 AMcGuireville TI Ramp & Bridge Rehab

(MP 293.25 - MP 293.75) *Additional Option B Advanced

Rehabilitate/repair McGuireville TI bridge and construct new southbound exit ramp. 7.79 M 6






Score

196 10E.31 Mescal Shoulder Widening (MP 293 - MP 299) Widen inside shoulder in both directions. 7.60 M 6

196 60W.2 Wittmann Area Safety Improvements (MP 132 - MP 120)

Install additional advanced signal warning sign with flashing beacon approximately 1000’ upstream and downstream of Center Street.

Improve signal visibility.0.16 M 6

198 40W.21 West Flagstaff Pavement Improvements - Replacement (MP 191 - MP 196) Replace pavement. 43.17 M 6

199 19.11 Papago TI (MP 54.4) Modify entry/exit ramps to parallel configuration. 4.43 M 6

200 17.18 Woods Canyon Bridges (MP 316.5 - MP 317.5)

Realign roadway and construct new bridges over Woods Canyon with de-icing system.

Install roadway weather information system (RWIS) near Rocky Park TI or Woods Canyon. 36.14 M 5

201 40.15 Canyon Diablo East Safety (MP 229 - MP 230)

For the entire length of the project (MP 229 – 230) improve skid resistance by reconstructing pavement, increasing super-elevation or mill and replace.

Install chevrons and curve warning signs.

Install a dynamic speed feedback system near MP 229 eastbound and MP 230 westbound.

Retrofit RWIS at the Two Guns TI at MP 230.

3.60 M 5

202 89.13 Forest Area Passing Lanes (MP 353.4 - MP 359.5) Construct a northbound passing lane between MP 353.4 – MP 355.5 and a southbound passing lane between MP 358.5 – MP 359.5. 13.42 M 5

203 40.11 West of Walnut Canyon Pavement (MP 202 - MP 205) Replace pavement in the eastbound direction between MP 203 and 204. 12.92 M 5

204 69.1 Central Ave Safety Improvements (MP 270.5 - MP 271)

Install intersection lighting at Central Avenue between MP 270.65 – MP 270.85.

Install a westbound “intersection ahead” warning sign at MP 270.5 and an eastbound “intersection ahead” warning sign at MP 271. 0.21 M 5

205 40W.2 Topock Area Pavement Improvements - Replacement (MP 3 - MP 8) Replace pavement. 35.93 M 4

206 10W.4 US 60 TI Ramp (MP 31) Modify existing EB/WB entry and exit ramps to a parallel configuration. 4.43 M 4

207 10W.1 Ehrenberg Pavement WB (MP 9 - MP 16)

Replace pavement between MP 9 and 16 in the WB direction.

Project to include pavement, over-excavation, striping, delineators, raised pavement markers and rumble strips. 25.15 P 4

208 40W.13 Willow Creek Safety Improvements (MP 80 - MP 98)

Construct EB climbing lane at MP 80-83 and MP 93-97.

Widen Echeverria OP EB bridge #1675, MP 94.45.

Widen Cross Mountain TI OP EB bridge #1677, MP 96.02.

Implement VSL at EB MP 80-83, EB MP 88-90 and EB MP 93-97 and integrate with existing RWIS at MP 91 and new DMS at EB MP 79 and WB MP 98.

51.22 M 4






Score

209 89.11 Drake Area Northbound Passing Lane (MP 343.9 - MP 345.6) Construct a northbound passing lane between MP 343.9 – MP 345.6. 7.09 M 4

210 80.6 Mule Gulch Area Freight Improvements (MP 345 - MP 348)

Construct passing lane WB, MP 346.9-347.6.

Construct passing lane EB, MP 345.6-346.1.4.48 M 3

211 191.1 A

US 191 Elfrida to I-10 Freight Mitigation: Widen shoulders, realign roadway, replace Cochise RR bridge

(MP 59.9 - MP 64) *Additional Option B Advanced

Realign Roadway.

Replace Cochise RR Bridge.46.72 M 3

212 60.1 Show Low Safety Improvements (MP 341 - MP 343)

Install raised median (MP 341-343).

Install high-visibility striping (MP 341-343).

Install lighting (MP 342-343).

Install right turn lane (MP 342.2).

4.80 M 3

212 10E.32 Mescal WB Climbing Lane (MP 296 - MP 299) Construct westbound climbing lane. 11.20 E 3

212 10E.39 B

West San Simon TI UP (#1164) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline

(MP 378.93) *Additional Options A & C Advanced

Reconstruct eastbound and westbound exit ramps to convert interchange to a diamond configuration. 3.60 M 3

212 10E.40 B

East San Simon TI UP (#1169) Bridge Vertical Clearance Mitigation: Reprofile Mainline

(MP 383.35) *Additional Options A & C Advanced

Reconstruct eastbound and westbound exit ramps to convert interchange to a diamond configuration. 3.60 M 3

216 8.2 BDome Valley Rd TI WB UP (#1325) Bridge Replacement


Replace bridge to achieve 16.5 feet vertical clearance. 1.76 M 3

217 40W.10 Kingman Area Climbing Lane (MP 47 - MP 51)

Construct EB climbing lane MP 47-51.

Widen W Kingman TI OP EB bridge #1835, MP 48.84.

Widen Clack Canyon Wash EB bridge #1837, MP 49.70.

Widen White Cliff Road OP EB bridge #1839, MP 50.09.

25.55 M 3

218 80.4 Banning Creek Area Climbing Lane (MP 336 - MP 338) Construct climbing lane EB, MP 336.0-337.3. 7.27 M 3

219 87.8 Ox Bow Estates Area Freight Improvements (MP 243 - MP 247) Construct NB climbing lane. 22.37 M 2






Score

220 40W.12 Kingman to US 93 Area Climbing Lane (MP 58 - MP 60) Construct EB climbing lane at MP 58-60. 7.46 M 2

221 10E.35 Exit 318 Lighting Improvements (MP 318) Install 12 (four per ramp) solar power LED lights at exit 318. 0.30 M 2

222 10W.6 Bouse Wash Rest Area Ramp (MP 52.5) Modify existing EB/WB entry and exit ramps to a parallel configuration. 4.43 M 2

223 40W.18 Ash Fork to Williams Area Climbing Lane (MP 151 - MP 159)

Construct EB climbing lane at MP 151-152 and MP 156-159.

Widen Devil Dog TI OP EB bridge #1178, MP 157.71. 22.82 M 1

224 8.6 AStanfield Rd TI UP (#1090) Reprofile



225 8.7 AMurphy Rd UP (#1091) Reprofile



226 60.6 Springerville Area Freight Improvements (MP 396 - MP 397) Construct EB climbing lane (MP 396-397). 3.70 M 1

226 10E.34 Dragoon EB Climbing Lane (MP 317 - MP 318) Construct eastbound climbing lane. 5.60 E 1

226 40W.20 Williams Area Climbing Lane (MP 162 - MP 163)

Construct WB climbing lane at MP 162-163.

Widen SFRR and Cata Lake OP WB bridge #1902, MP 162.38.5.60 M 1

229 19.9 Sahuarita TI (MP 46.8) Modify entry/exit ramps to parallel configuration. 4.43 M 1

230 8.3 BVekol Road TI UP (#550) Bridge Replacement


Replace bridge to achieve 16.5 feet vertical clearance. 2.16 M 1

231 260.14 Mogollon Rim Area Climbing Lane (MP 277 - MP 280) Construct EB climbing lane. 16.79 M 1

232 17.9 Dry Beaver Creek SB Climbing Lane (MP 292 - MP 294) Construct southbound climbing lane and widen Dry Beaver Creek Bridge. 9.35 M 1

233 17.17 Woods Canyon Climbing Lane (MP 316 - MP 317) Construct southbound climbing lane. 5.60 M 1



Appe

ndic

es

Appendices

Appendix A: Statewide Performance Maps

August 2018 Statewide Summary Report Appendix A-2 Corridor Profile Study Program

This appendix contains maps of each primary and secondary measure associated with the five performance areas for the statewide corridors.

Pavement Performance Area:

Pavement Index Pavement Serviceability (directional) Percentage Failure

Bridge Performance Area:

Bridge Index Bridge Sufficiency Percent of Deck Area on Functionally Obsolete Bridges Lowest Bridge Rating

Mobility Performance Area:

Mobility Index Future Daily V/C Ratio Existing Peak Hour V/C (directional) Closure Frequency Directional Travel Time Index Directional Planning Time Index Percentage of Bicycle Accommodation

Safety Performance Area:

Safety Index Directional Safety Index Relative Frequency of Fatal & Incapacitating Injury Crashes Involving Motorcycles Relative Frequency of Fatal & Incapacitating Injury Crashes Involving SHSP Top 5 Emphasis Areas Relative Frequency of Fatal & Incapacitating Injury Crashes Involving Trucks

Freight Performance Area:

Freight Index Directional Truck Travel Time Index Directional Truck Planning Time Index Closure Duration Bridge Vertical Clearance













Appendix B: Corridor Performance Tables

August 2018 Statewide Summary Report Appendix B-2 Corridor Profile Study Program

I-8: California State Line to I-10



I-10: California State Line to SR 85 and SR 85: I-10 to I-8



I-10: SR 202L to New Mexico State Line (I-10 East)



I-17: SR 101L to I-40



I-19: Nogales to I-10



I-40: California State Line to I-17 (I-40 West)



I-40: I-17 to New Mexico State Line (I-40 East)



SR 64: I-40 to Grand Canyon National Park









SR 77: US 60 to SR 377



SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40



SR 90: I-10 to SR 80 and SR 80: SR 90 to US 191



SR 95: I-8 to I-40



SR 179: I-17 to SR 89A; SR 89A: SR 179 to SR 260; and SR 260: SR 89A to I-17



SR 260: SR 277 to SR 73 and US 60: SR 260 to New Mexico State Line



SR 347: I-10 to SR 84 and SR 84: SR 347 to I-8



US 60/US 70: SR 79 to US 191 and US 191: US 70 to SR 80



US 89: Flagstaff to Utah State Line






US 160: US 89 to New Mexico State Line


Appendix C: Corridor Needs Tables

August 2018 Statewide Summary Report Appendix C-2 Corridor Profile Study Program







I-17: SR 101L to I-40














SR 77: US 60 to SR 377


SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40




SR 95: I-8 to I-40















Appendix D: Corridor Screening Tables

August 2018 Statewide Summary Report Appendix D-2 Corridor Profile Study Program





















I-17: SR 101L to I-40























SR 77: US 60 to SR 377


SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40










SR 95: I-8 to I-40































Appendix E: Other Corridor Recommendations

August 2018 Statewide Summary Report Appendix E-2 Corridor Profile Study Program


Consider a corridor strategy to upgrade all bridges to current standards in anticipation of increased truck/freight traffic over the medium to long term. Consider corridor wide ITS solutions to assist truck/freight traffic over the medium to long term.


When recommending future projects along the I-10/SR 85 Corridor, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement and bridge locations have exhibited high historical investment (pavement) or rating fluctuation (bridge) issues: Pavement: MP 0-16 Pavement: MP 54-71 Bridge: Tom Wells Rd TI (MP 5.84)


Implement corridor monitoring through the urban areas of Phoenix and Tucson to help alleviate drug/alcohol-involved crashes. Coordinate with MPOs and local agencies to pursue travel demand management options like park-and-ride lots, bus rapid transit, van pools, and the addition of an HOV lane (in the Tucson

Metropolitan area) to promote non-SOV trips along the corridor Install Dynamic Dust Warning Signs at various locations along I-10 where blowing dust is common, causing visibility issues. When I-10 closures occur near the New Mexico border or farther east, oversize vehicles traveling eastbound past the US 191 exit are unable to turn around because of height restrictions of the traffic

interchanges (TIs). A solution would be to raise the height of the Cavot Road underpass to accommodate oversize vehicles, allowing them access to mainline detour routes (current posted clearance is less than 14 feet).

All bridges that are currently programmed should include more than just deck rehabilitation where rating for the substructure or superstructure are a 5 or lower.

I-17: SR 101L to I-40

Conduct study to investigate paving roadway along existing dirt roads connecting Bumble Bee Rd (MP 248) to Bloody Basin Rd (MP 259) for use during closures, similar to N20 interim detour for US 89.

Continue to provide additional driver messaging and emphasis on safety during holiday weekends. The scoping and design of project H893401C (Coconino County Line to I-40)(FY 18) should investigate safety improvements such as installing high visibility striping and delineators, raised pavement

markers, rumble strips and widening/rehabilitating the inside (median) shoulder in both directions of travel. When recommending future projects along I-17, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement and bridge locations have exhibited

high historical investment (pavement) or rating fluctuation (bridge) issues: I-17 OP @ Frt Rd SB #2180 (MP 215) Pavement MP 215 – MP 222 Pavement MP 222 – MP 232 Moores Gulch SB #339 (MP 238.6)

Pavement MP 253 – MP 263 Dugas Rd TI SB #1080 (MP 268.75) Cienga Creek NB #428 (MP 277.93) Middle Verde Rd TI #1733 (MP 289.97)

Pavement MP 288 – MP 299 Pavement MP 299 – MP 307 Pavement MP 307 – MP 316 McGuireville TI #652 (MP 293.26)


Pavement MP 323 – MP 340 Willard Springs TI NB #1583 (MP 326) Airport Rd TI #632 (MP 337.39


Install Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) conduit with all new infrastructure projects Prepare strategic plans for Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) camera and Road Weather Information System (RWIS) locations statewide Leverage power and communication at existing weigh-in-motion (WIM), dynamic messaging signs (DMS), and call box locations to expand ITS applications across the state Consider solar power for lighting and ITS where applicable Investigate ice formation prediction technology where applicable Conduct highway safety manual evaluation for all future programmed projects Develop infrastructure maintenance and preservation plans (including schedule and funding) for all pavement and bridge infrastructure replacement or expansion projects Develop standardized bridge maintenance procedures so districts can do routine maintenance work Review historical ratings and level of previous investment during scoping of pavement and bridge projects; in pavement locations that warrant further investigation, conduct subsurface investigations

during project scoping to determine if full replacement is warranted For pavement rehabilitation projects, enhance the amount/level of geotechnical investigations to address issues specific to the varying conditions along the project Expand programmed and future pavement projects as necessary to include shoulders Expand median cable barrier guidelines to account for safety performance Install CCTV cameras with all DMS In locations with limited communications, use CCTV cameras to provide still images rather than streaming video Develop statewide program for pavement replacement Install additional continuous permanent count stations along strategic corridors to enhance traffic count data When reconstruction or rehabilitation activities will affect existing bridge vertical clearance, the dimension of the new bridge vertical clearance should be a minimum of 16.25 feet where feasible All new or reconstructed roadway/shoulder edges adjacent to an unpaved surface should be constructed with a Safety Edge Collision data on tribal lands may be incomplete or inconsistent; additional coordination for data on tribal lands is recommended to ensure adequate reflection of safety issues Expand data collection devices statewide to measure freight delay Evaluate and accommodate potential changes in freight and goods movement trends that may result from improvements and expansions to the state roadway network


Expand the limits of the programmed pavement rehabilitation project in FY 2019 at MP 108-123 to also include MP 123-124 to address the Pavement hot spot at MP 123-124 Expand the limits of the programmed pavement rehabilitation project in FY 2018 at MP 162-179 to also include MP 160-162 to address the Pavement hot spot at MP 160-161 Expand the scope of the programmed bridge deck rehabilitation project in FY 2019 at the W Flagstaff TI WB Bridge #1129 at MP 192 to also include bridge superstructure rehabilitation to address the

low superstructure rating at this bridge Conduct an interchange operations study for the I-40/SR 95 interchange near MP 10 Promote planned construction of I-40/US 93 system interchange near MP 49



The analysis shows a high number of fatal and incapacitating injury crashes that are attributed to behavior conditions in the first three segments of the corridor. This report recommends that a Roadway Safety Analysis should be conducted on this portion of the corridor in order to better understand the high occurrence of behavior crashes and possibly designate this portion of the corridor as a “Safety Corridor”.

Input from the North Central District and North Eastern District indicated subgrade issues in the pavement from approximately Mileposts 196 to 202 which was confirmed with a high historical investment. However, the most current data included in pavement records indicate no current need was present at the team the data was collected. This report recommends that the materials section study this section of pavement further prior to the next rehabilitation project to confirm if this section of roadway needs reconstruction.

When recommending future projects along the I-40 East Corridor, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement and bridge locations have exhibited high historical investment (pavement) or rating fluctuation (bridge) issues: Pavement MP 196-203 Pavement MP 204-212 Pavement MP 246-275 Pavement MP 276-304 Pavement MP 326-360 Canyon Padre Br EB (MP 218.73)

Twin Arrows TI UP MP219.53) Canyon Diablo Br WB (MP 229.90) Sunshine BNSF RR OP WB (MP 237.10) Little Colo River Br EB/WB MP 256.95) W Joseph City TI UP (#1893) (MP 274.76) Hunt Rd TI UP (MP 280.64)

Navajo TI UP (MP 325.92) McCarroll TI UP (MP 330.00) Chambers TI UP (MP 333.41) Ortega Rd TI UP (MP 341.81) Black Creek Br EB (MP 347.9)

R 64: I-40 to Grand Canyon National Park

Project P9100 07P, proposed in an ADOT Scoping Letter in January 2017, is a pavement preservation project on the SR 64 Corridor with proposed project limits beginning at MP 185.46 and ending at MP 205. This proposed project added the pavement preservation item from MP 185.5-205 to the scope of CS64.1

Conduct future wildlife mitigation studies to address and reduce the high number of animal crashes on the SR 64 Corridor. According to data used for this study, animal-vehicle collisions (not resulting in fatal or incapacitating crashes) are concentrated in the following locations: Eastbound: MP 186-196, MP 204-210, MP 211-213, MP 218-237 Westbound: MP 186-194, MP 196-199, MP 219, MP 222-223, MP 224-237


A series of RSAs is recommended along the SR 95 corridor at MP 229.4-246.0. The RSAs should include a review of pedestrian crossing behaviors and current access control. An RSA was completed for MP 242-250 in October 2008. Recommendations should be reviewed and updated with an emphasis on pedestrian safety

Local policy should be implemented to require new developments to provide sidewalk along SR 95 North frontage through Fort Mohave and Bullhead City Increased enforcement is recommended related to motorists failing to yield the right-of-way at intersections and for pedestrians crossing improperly on SR 95 North through Fort Mohave and Bullhead

City. A pedestrian safety campaign should be implemented that includes providing local businesses with ADOT pedestrian safety pamphlets


When recommending future projects along the SR 69/SR 89A/SR 89 Corridor, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement and bridge locations have exhibited high historical investment (pavement) or rating fluctuation (bridge) issues:


Bridge: Big Chino Wash Bridge (#979) (SR 89 MP 335.95) Pavement: SR 69 MP 263 – 280

Continue to pursue funding and support the ultimate plan for SR 89A to be widened to a 6 lane divided freeway to accommodate for long-term projected development and population growth along the corridor in the City of Prescott and Town of Prescott Valley.

Continue to pursue funding and support the ultimate plan for converting the Robert Road intersection at Fain Road to a grade separated traffic interchange. According to crash data and field reviews, additional studies are recommended to provide more in depth analysis for the following corridor concerns:

SR 89 Passing Zone Identification Study SR 89 Wildlife Mitigation Study

SR 77: US 60 to SR 377 There are no other corridor recommendations for the SR 77 Corridor.

SR 87/SR 260/SR 377: SR 202L to I-40

Implement a driving impaired and speeding safety education campaign along the corridor Coordinate with the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) to conduct a study on vehicle/wildlife conflicts on SR 87 between MP 233 and 241 Conduct an access management study on SR 87 and SR 260 through the Town of Payson


Removal of the Lowell RR UP Bridges (#269 and #1033 at MP 343.01) would relieve the low vertical clearance issue in the area; however, the Mule Pass Tunnel would still be a vertical clearance hot spot at MP 339.20

Conduct seat belt-related enforcement and education, particularly in the Sierra Vista area Signal coordination proposed in Solution CS90.2 should include signal coordination with nearby SR 92 as well

SR 95: I-8 to I-40

Conduct a feasibility study for installing automated flood warning system in areas prone to flooding Coordinate with the Lake Havasu Strategic Transportation Safety Plan to identify safety improvements and programs to reduce crashes on SR 95 in Lake Havasu City Coordinate with the Western Arizona Council of Governments (WACOG) Strategic Transportation Safety Plan to identify safety improvements and programs to reduce crashes on SR 95 in Mohave

County and La Paz County Investigate feasibility of advanced warning and alternate routing system during roadway closure events such as flash flooding and other incidents to improve resiliency and emergency response


Implement a travel time information system network for the corridor (including DMS, CCTV, etc.) Implement a shuttle system with park and ride lots


Conduct an intersection performance study at SR 89A/SR 260 intersection in Cottonwood Construct a bicycle boulevard on the north side of SR 89A, MP 369-374 Conduct an access management plan for the West Sedona area of the corridor Conduct an access management plan for the Cottonwood area of the corridor Support City of Sedona efforts to implement improvements at the Y intersection as proposed in the City’s Transportation Master Plan


Conduct access management studies in the future for the more populated areas of the SR 260 | US 60 corridor: US 60 through the Town Show Low from MP 340-342 SR 260 beginning in Show Low to Pinetop-Lakeside from MP 341-355

Conduct future wildlife mitigation studies to address and reduce the high number of animal crashes on the SR 260 | US 60 corridor. According to data used for this study, animal-vehicle collisions (not resulting in fatal or incapacitating crashes) are concentrated in the following locations: SR 260 – Eastbound: MP 309-322, MP 324-333, MP 335-337, MP 352, MP 356-357 SR 260 – Westbound: MP 310-317, MP 318-323, MP 324-333, MP 336, MP 343-345, MP 346-351 US 60 – Eastbound: MP 343-345, MP 349-351, MP 358-363 US 60 – Westbound: MP 350-352, MP 358-360, MP 362-364, MP 365-367, MP 387-388


An RSA is recommended on SR 347 between MP 171.4 and MP 175.4


Sign Visibility Study in the Safford area along US 191 is recommended to identify locations with potential to improve retroreflectivity Road Safety Assessments are recommended in Peridot, Cutter and Globe to identify safety improvements, specifically pedestrian circulation and access needs in Peridot. Access Control Studies in Peridot (MP 270 – 274) and Globe-Miami (MP 243 – 255) are recommended to reduce friction and improve safety Recommend Superior to Globe Design Concept Study Recommend San Carlos Area (MP 268 – 292) Superelevation Study


When recommending future projects along the US 89 Corridor, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement and bridge locations have exhibited high historical investment (pavement) or rating fluctuation (bridge) issues: Pavement MP 465-481

Conduct an access management study within the City of Page to help preserve and manage access to/from US 89



Install Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) conduit with all new infrastructure projects Prepare strategic plans for Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) camera and Road Weather Information System (RWIS) locations statewide Leverage power and communication at existing weigh-in-motion (WIM), dynamic messagingsigns (DMS), and call box locations to expand ITS applications across the state Consider solar power for lighting and ITS where applicable Investigate ice formation prediction technology where applicable Conduct highway safety manual evaluation for all future programmed projects Develop infrastructure maintenance and preservation plans (including schedule and funding) for all pavement and bridge infrastructure replacement or expansion projects Develop standardized bridge maintenance procedures so districts can do routinemaintenance work Review historical ratings and level of previous investment during scoping of pavement and bridge projects; in pavement locations that warrant further investigation, conduct subsurface investigations

during project scoping to determine if full replacement is warranted For pavement rehabilitation projects, enhance the amount/level of geotechnical investigations to address issues specific to the varying conditions along the project Expand programmed and future pavement projects as necessary to include shoulders Expand median cable barrier guidelines to account for safety performance Install CCTV cameras with all DMS In locations with limited communications, use CCTV cameras to provide still images rather than streaming video Develop statewide program for pavement replacement Install additional continuous permanent count stations along strategic corridors to enhance traffic count data When reconstruction or rehabilitation activities will affect existing bridge vertical clearance, the dimension of the new bridge vertical clearance should be a minimum of 16.25 feet where feasible All new or reconstructed roadway/shoulder edges adjacent to an unpaved surface should beconstructed with a Safety Edge Collision data on tribal lands may be incomplete or inconsistent; additional coordination for data on tribal lands is recommended to ensure adequate reflection of safety issues Expand data collection devices statewide to measure freight delay Evaluate and accommodate potential changes in freight and goods movement trends that may result from improvements and expansions to the state roadway network


When recommending future projects along the US 160 Corridor, review historical ratings and levels of investment. According to data used for this study, the following pavement location have exhibited high historical investment issues: Pavement MP 362-374

As the area continues to grow, continue to provide support for a standard Diamond Interchange with a structure over US 89 at the US 89/US 160 intersection as recommended in Final Design Concept Report - US 89 Antelope Hills to Jct. US 160 MP 442 to MP 484.

Documents

STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORT...PRPARD FR Prepared y CORRIDOR PROFILE STUDY PROGRAM Final Report STATEWIDE SUMMARY REPORT h'h^d2 1 ADT CNTRACT NO. 11-013164 ADT R TAS NO. MPD 043-15 PREPARED