Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Statement of passing over:
This information has been supplied by the Vendor or the Vendor's agents. Accordingly, Smart Real Estate Limited is merely passing over this information as supplied to us by the Vendor or the Vendor's agent. We cannot guarantee its accuracy and reliability as we have not checked, audited or reviewed the information and all intending Purchasers are advised to conduct their own due diligence investigation into this information. As an intending Purchaser our recommendation is that you seek legal independent advice on all matters material to your decisions. To the maximum extent permitted by law Smart Real Estate Limited does not accept any responsibility to any person for the accuracy or use of the information herein.
Disclaimer
www.smartrealestate.co.nz
Ph: 03 384 8600 : Post: PO Box 19833 Christchurch 8241
Email: [email protected] Licensed Agent REAA 2008
Electrical Certificate of Compliance and
Electrical Safety Certificate
Reference/Certificate ID No:
This form has been designed to be used by licensed electrical workers to certify that installations or Part installations under Part 1 or Part 2 of AS/NZS 3000 are safe to be connected to the specified system of electrical supply.
Name of Electrical worker:
Registration/Practising licence number:
Organisation/company:
Phone: Email: Name of person(s) supervised:
CoC
Type of work: Additions Alterations New work
The prescribed electrical work is: Low risk General High risk (specify):
Reference Standards: Part 1 of AS/NZS 3000 Part 2 of AS/NZS 3000
Additional Standards:
Description of work: (including date/s of work and type of supply system)
I certify that the completed prescribed electrical work to which this Certificate of Compliance applies has been done lawfully and safely, and the information in the certificate is correct in that the installation, or part of the installation:Select those that apply:
Has been installed in accordance with the specified certified design1 Test ResultsPolarity (independent earth):
Insulation resistance:
Earth Continuity:
Bonding:
Fault Loop impedance:
Other (specify):
Has an earthing system that is correctly rated (where applicable)
Contains fittings that are safe to connect to a power supply
Relies on a supplier Declaration of Conformity1
Has been satisfactorily tested in accordance with the Electricity (Safety) Regulations 2010
Is safe to connect
Electronic/Other reference:
Certifier’s signature: Date: / /
1 Attach or reference. If it is impractical to attach a copy of a particular manufacturer’s instructions, or of any certified design or supplier declaration of conformity, provide a reference to where the documents can be found, in a readily accessible format, by electronic means.
ESC
I certify that the installation, or part of the installation, to which this Electrical Safety Certificate applies is connected to a power supply and is safe to use.
Certifier’s name: Registration/Practising licence number:
Certifier’s signature:
Certificate Issue Date:
/ / Connection Date:
/ /
CUSTOMER COPY – THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT AND SHOULD BE RETAINED FOR A MINIMUM OF 7 YEARSThis certificate also confirms that the electrical work complies with the building code for the purposes of Section 19(1)(e) of the Building Act 2004.
LOCATION AND CONTACT
Location Details Contact Address
Postcode Contact Name
MB14132 04/17
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 1
12th
November 2019
13th
December 2019
Attention: Matt Higgins
Post EQ Repair Structural Inspection Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch
1.0 Scope
Visual external and internal inspections at the premises was carried out at 174 Breezes Road,
Aranui, Christchurch on the 12th
of December 2019 to assess the structure and condition of the
building on the property following recent repairs.
174 Breezes Road
2.0 Site Description
The property is located at 174 Breezes Road and accessed directly off Breezes Road (see Figure 1
below).
The single-story timber framed house is founded on a piled foundation with a perimeter
concrete strip (Type B2 foundation). There is timber weather board cladding and a lightweight
corrugated iron roof.
The building has undergone extensive renovations and relevelling throughout with new piles as
necessary and repairs to the external perimeter strip footing.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 2
12th
November 2019
Site location plan
3.0 Site Investigations
A visual inspection was carried out by the author of this report on the 12th
of December 2019.
The following investigations were included in (but not limited to) the site investigations:
• Internal and external visual inspection of buildings on the property.
• Floor levels via a Zip level survey.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 3
12th
November 2019
4.0 Structural Observations
4.1 Foundations
The house is founded on a reinforced concrete perimeter strip footing with existing internal
concrete piles and new H5 timber piles. Both new piles have been placed as necessary and
existing bearers lifted and packed, with new ties between piles and bearers placed throughout.
The perimeter strip has been jacked in the NW corner with both reinforced concrete jacking
pads and a full concrete flood post lifting. Any cracks in the perimeter strip have been repaired
with cut-in epoxied reinforcing bars and epoxy with a plaster screed over.
New floor coverings, both vinyl and carpet, have been placed throughout.
See level survey attached.
Typical Perimeter RC Strip
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 4
12th
November 2019
Existing Concrete Pile
New Timber Pile
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 5
12th
November 2019
Typical internal floor condition
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 6
12th
November 2019
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 7
12th
November 2019
4.2 Internal Walls/ Ceilings
All internal decorating has been completed with no damage evident.
The internal walls and ceilings are structurally sound.
Typical internal wall/ ceiling condition
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 8
12th
November 2019
Typical internal wall/ ceiling condition
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 9
12th
November 2019
4.3 External Cladding
Repairs to weather boards and a full external repaint has been completed.
Typical External Cladding Condition.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 10
12th
November 2019
4.4 Roof Structure and Cladding
No damage is noticeable to the roof structure. The roof cladding has been replaced with new
light weight steel throughout.
Roofing/ External Cladding Typical Condition.
Typical Roof Structure Condition.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 11
12th
November 2019
4.5 Paving and Other External Items.
All paving is in an undamaged as new condition. New timber fences have been
constructed with landscaping ongoing.
Typical Paving/ timber fence Condition.
Landscaping in progress.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 12
12th
November 2019
Typical Driveway Condition.
Post EQ Repair Structural Report: 174 Breezes, Christchurch P a g e | 13
12th
November 2019
5.0 Discussion
• All structural repairs have been satisfactory completed; the building is in a structurally
sound condition.
• Full relevel completed with new piles as necessary and repairs to the external perimeter
as necessary in accordance with engineers details.
• Levels have been recorded as noted. (26mm max differential)
• External paving is in a new undamaged condition.
• Full redecorating both internally and externally completed including a new light weight
steel roof and new floor coverings all around.
• Repairs to the internal plasterboard and external cladding have been completed.
• Cosmetic repairs have been completed.
6.0 Explanatory Statement
The inspection of the building discussed in this report has been undertaken only to comment on
the condition of the building following repairs via a brief visual inspection.
The report does not address defects that are not reasonably discoverable on visual inspection,
including defects in inaccessible places and latent defects. No calculations have been completed.
This report has been at the request of its client and is exclusively for its client’s use. To make a
property assessment of this report, a clear understanding is required of the terms of
engagement under which the report has been prepared, including the scope of the instructions
and directions given. No responsibility or liability to any third party is accepted for any loss or
damage whatsoever arising out of the use of or reliance on this report by any third party.
Joe M
cGirr
BE (Hons) (Civil), CPENG, MIPENZ, IntPE(NZ)
STRUCTURAL/CIVIL ENGINEER
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 1 | P a g e
21st November 2018 - Amended 24
th September 2019
Attention: Matt Higgins
Shallow Soil Test Report
Address: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch
1.0 Scope
A shallow soil geotechnical investigation was completed at the above address on the 13th
of
November 2018 to estimate the bearing capacity available.
Liquefaction-related settlement has not been assessed via a specific deep investigation with CPT
tests in this report.
2.0 Site Description
The section at 174 Breezes Road is accessed via a private driveway off Breezes Road, (see Figure
1 below). The site is essentially clear with direct access via a shared drive off Breezes Road.
.
Figure 1: Site location plan
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 2 | P a g e
3.0 Regional Geology
3.1 CERA Classification
Current land classification for the site is Technical Category 3 (TC3, Blue). According to the CERA
website, land classified TC3, Blue means “moderate to significant land damage from liquefaction
is possible in future large earthquakes and foundation solutions should be based on site specific
geotechnical investigation and specific engineering foundation design”.
Figure 2: Location of site is within CERA TC3 residential technical category classification area.
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 3 | P a g e
3.2 Geological Classification
According to the “Geology of the Christchurch Urban Area, Geological Map 1” by the Institute of
Geological & Nuclear Sciences, the site at 174 Breezes Road is composed of “dominantly sand of
fixed and semi fixed dunes and beaches” (see Figure 3).
Figure 3: Excerpt from the Christchurch Geological Map 2008
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 4 | P a g e
4.0 Geotechnical Investigation
The ground investigation comprised of the following:
• Four hand auger boreholes (designated HA) to a maximum depth of 4.0m bgl or as
possible.
• Four DCP Scala penetrometer tests (designated DCP) to a maximum depth of 4.0m bgl
or to effective refusal. The DCP tests were carried out adjacent to the Hand Auger
Boreholes. (Effective refusal was met as DCP1 and penetrometer was unable to used at
site 2 to 4, although good results were obtained and expected over the site).
The level of testing carried out is in accordance with the Department of Building and Housing
Technical guidelines: Repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes
(2012) (Version 3).
The locations of the hand auger boreholes and the DCP tests are shown on Figure 4.
Figure 4: Aerial photograph of the property showing locations of DCPs and HAs.
DCP4 / HA4
DCP3 / HA3
DCP2 / HA2
DCP1 / HA1
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 5 | P a g e
The soil was logged based on inspection of samples brought up by the auger, in accordance with
NZ Geotechnical Society’s “Guideline for the Field Classification and Description of Soil and Rock
for Engineering Purposes: 2005”.
The Ultimate Bearing Capacity from the shallow DCP investigation (inferred from Stockwell
1977) has been provided in Section 7.0 below.
5.0 Ground Conditions Encountered
Investigations at the site indicates a deep sand with a silty component in the upper 0.5m.
6.0 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered to approximately 0.7m BGL at one borehole. It should be
noted, however, that groundwater levels are transient in nature and can show quite significant
seasonal variations and that it is likely to be the driest time of the year.
This should be born in mind when planning construction with provision for dewatering. The
building contractor is to take appropriate measures to deal with any groundwater ingress to the
foundation excavations and keep the excavations free of groundwater intrusion until the
footings are cast.
It is recommended that foundation excavations are carried out in dry weather conditions, with
the reinforcing and concrete placed as soon as practicable. Foundation excavations should not
be left open for more than three days. In addition, rainfall and stormwater should not be
allowed to pond within the footing excavations.
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 6 | P a g e
7.0 Engineering Considerations
7.1 Ground Bearing
From interpretation of both the scala results and the auger logs, the following design bearing
capacities can be inferred:
� >200kPa Ultimate Bearing Capacity can be assumed at a depth of 0.5m below ground
level (mbgl).
� Driven pile foundations in accordance with NZS3604 may be considered.
The following capacity reduction factors should be used with the ultimate rupture bearing
capacities:
1. Earthquake capacity overstrength: 0.8
2. Ultimate Limit State with factored loads: 0.5
3. Serviceability Limit State with unfactored loads: 0.33
Engineer to inspect excavated ground to confirm satisfactory bearing before any construction
works are to proceed - Please provide at least 48hours notice.
7.2.1 Liquefaction
From interpretation of both the site specific CPT data and the data available from the
Canterbury geotechnical database it can be assumed that this site has a low to moderate
liquefaction potential at Serviceability (SLS) (<50mm) limit state.
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 7 | P a g e
7.2.2 Liquefaction Inferred from Canterbury Geotechnical Database Data
Minor ground cracking but no observed ejected was recorded in EQC observations for the Feb
2011 Earthquake. No liquefaction of ground cracking was observed in our site inspection.
Data from the Canterbury Geotechnical Database (Project Orbit) provides information on
forward analyses that have been conducted with CPTs conducted in neighboring areas to
determine expected settlements. Figure 5 below shows the calculated settlements for an SLS
design earthquake (PGA 0.13g, M7.5) and a ULS design earthquake (PGA 0.35g, M7.5).
Figure 5: Calculated settlements from forward analysis using design earthquakes
According to the data available, 7-11mm of SLS settlements and 90-144mm of ULS settlements
are expected in the vicinity of the site.
7.3 Lateral Stretch
Given that this property is not located within 200m of a free edge this site conforms with the
required performance expectations for a TC2 subdivsion.
7.4 Fall Hazard
Given the nature of the site fall hazard from both rockfall and slippage will not be a problem.
X
X
144m
20mm
115mm
11mm
X
X
90mm
7mm
10mm
98mm
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 8 | P a g e
8.0 Limitations
This report has been prepared in accordance with the brief provided. The contents of the report
are for the sole use of the Client and no responsibility or liability will be accepted to any third
party. Data or opinions contained within the report may not be used in other contexts or for any
other purposes without prior review and agreement.
The recommendations in this report are based on data collected at specific locations and by
using suitable investigation techniques. Only a finite amount of information has been collected
to meet the specific financial and technical requirements of the Client’s brief and this report
does not purport to completely describe all the site characteristics and properties. The nature
and continuity of the ground between test locations has been inferred using experience and
judgment and it must be appreciated that the actual conditions may vary from the assumed
model. No deep investigation has been carried out, this will be required if resilience against
liquefaction related settlement is required.
Subsurface conditions relevant to construction works should be assessed by contractors who
can make their own interpretation of the factual data provided. They should perform any
additional tests as necessary for their own purposes.
Subsurface conditions, such as ground water and slope conditions can change over time. This
should be borne in mind, particularly if this report is used after a protracted delay.
Joe McGirr BE (Hons) (Civil), CPENG, MIPENZ, IntPE(NZ)
Civil Engineer
Encl.
Test Log Data
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 9 | P a g e
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 10 | P a g e
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 11 | P a g e
Soil Test Report: 174 Breezes Road, Christchurch 12 | P a g e
As Built Drainage Plan
From: Matt HigginsTo: Stacey MillerSubject: Fwd: Drives patiosDate: Tuesday, 17 December 2019 8:22:52 AM
Active plumbing
Begin forwarded message:
From: [email protected]: 28 November 2019 at 9:43:46 AM NZDTTo: Joe McGirr <[email protected]>Subject: Drives patios
Active plumbing
20393-1
FORM OF PRODUCER STATEMENT PS3 – CONSTRUCTION
At project completion, this form shall be completed by the building contractor and supplied to the Engineer.
ISSUED BY:…………………………………………………………………………………………. (Building Contractor)
TO: …………………………………………………………………………………………………. (Owner/Principal)
IN RESPECT OF:…………………………………………………………………………………… (Description of Contract Works)
AT:……………………………………………………………………………………………………. (Address)
T/A:…………………………………………………… BUILDING CONSENT No:……………… (Territorial Authority / Building Consent Authority)
The above Building Contractor has contracted to the above Owner/Principal to carry out and complete certain building works in accordance with the contract, titled .................................................................. .................................................... (“the contract”) (Title of building contract)
I ................................................................................ a duly authorised representative of the (Builder’s Authorised Agent) above building contractor, believe on reasonable grounds that the above building contractor has carried out and completed
�All �Part only as specified in the attached particulars
of the building works in accordance with the contract.
…………………………………………………………………… (Signature of Authorised Agent on behalf of the Building Contractor)
…………………………………………………………………… (Date)
........................................................................................... …………………………………………………………………… (Address) This producer statement is confirmation by the builder(s) that they have carried out the building work in accordance with the drawings, specifications (and site amendments) that are part of the contract / building consent documents. Work covered by this statement should have been supervised and checked by suitably qualified trades-persons. The Engineer requires this producer statement and a copy of the T/A’s building consent conditions, to confirm that items of the contract that he has not personally examined, have in fact been built according to the documents, so that the Engineer may issue appropriate documents to the T/A for it to release the Code Compliance Certificate.
Progress Certificate174 Breezes Road, Aranui CHRISTCHURCH
Instruction Instructed By: ValocityPrepared for: Bank of New Zealand Limited
Private Bag 39888Wellington, Lower Hutt 5045
Borrower: Matt Higgins
Our Reference: CLT-M44A-7TB
Progress To Date
In accordance with our recent instruction we have re-inspected the above property for the purpose of providing a progress payment report detailing the level of work now complete. We note the property “as is” has two values and separate methodologies to derive a value.
If the property remains under the current ownership and the development is completed then it has a value in-situ. If the property was to be placed on the open market incomplete “as is” its value would be significantly less.
In accordance with instructions we have been requested to provide an indication of the property’s value on the basis that the development is completed by our mutual client with each property issued a separate title. Our progress valuation is based on the property being fully completed as per our previous report and reflects an apportionment of this value. This valuation is contingent on the property having individual titles issued and all subdivision fees paid.
Our inspection of the property on 16 December 2019 confirms that there has been nosignificant deviations to the original plans provided regarding the repair, constructionand design which also illustrates the proposed works to the property upon which ourestimated 'as if complete' value was based.
We confirm that the existing dwelling has been fully repaired and completed and isnow ready to be occupied with the exception of some minor finishings. Regarding thesubdivision we understand from our mutual client that consent has been obtained with224c lodged. We understand titles will issue early next year. We have made anallowance of $50,000 to complete any outstanding subdivision work (legal, surveyor,development contrubtion fees etc). We understand the vacant site to the rear hasconsented plans and is ready for siteworks to commence.
Progress ValuationQuotable ValueQV Free Phone 0800 16 44 44Date Issued: 17/12/2019 1 of 5
2 of 5
Existing house new build Land Value $ 115,000 $ 120,000Value of improvements $ 210,000 $ 280,000Market Value (excluding chattels) $ 325,000 $ 400,000Added value of chattels $ 5,000 $ 10,000Market value (including chattels) $ 330,000 $ 410,000All figures are inclusive of GST and with separate titles
Estimate of value 'as if completed' (including chattels) $ 740,000
Less estimated cost to complete $ 310,000
Achieved value as partially complete $ 430,000All figures are inclusive of GST
We reported to you in August 2019 and placed a collective completed market value of$740,000 upon the property based on the plans that were issued to us. This comprised$330,000 for the existing front house fully repaired and refurbished. To the rear will bea new four bedroom, two bathroom house which we assessed with an "as if complete"market value of $410,000. Each property will be on seperate titles.
Previously Assessed Market Value
This cost to complete includes all outstanding building work, site improvements anddwelling chattels as specified in our original market valuation.
For your convenience we provide our assessed market value 'as if complete' dated 28thAugust 2019 as follows:
Our achieved value only includes materials that were fixed on site at the date ofinspection. No allowances are made for purchased items that are not installed (if any).
Achieved Value Of Partially Completed Property
In order to determine the Achieved Value we estimate the cost to complete the projectthen deduct this from our originally assessed market value 'as if complete'Taking intoconsideration the building and site works yet to be completed we estimate the cost tocomplete to be $310,000.
3 of 5
Yours faithfully,Quotable Value
Isaac WalkerREGISTERED VALUERMPINZ, ANZIV
It is widely recognised that a prudent purchaser of a property at this stage ofconstruction would factor an allowance for the completion of the project as well as aprofit margin for undertaking this work. This discount would be over and above thecost to complete. This has not been provided for in our assessment.
Identification and status of the valuer
Conditions and Assumptions
The above estimated progress calculations are based on all necessary consents andpermits having been acquired for the construction of the dwelling and that all work iscompleted in accordance with the plans and specifications provided to us and thencompleted to a good standard and quality of workmanship.
Please read this letter in conjunction with our valuation report dated 28 August 2019.This certificate remains subject to the same assumptions, terms and conditions.
We trust this will meet your requirements at this stage. Please do not hesitate tocontact me should you require any further assistance or clarification.
This report has been carried out by Isaac Walker a registered valuer holding an AnnualPractising Certificate.
Inspection / Report Preparation /
4 of 5
Subject Property Photos
5 of 5
