STATEMENT OF BASIS For the issuance ofDraft Air Permit ... · STATEMENT OF BASIS For the issuance ofDraft Air Permit # 0224-AOP-RI5 AFIN: 15-00001 1. PERMITTING AUTHORITY: Arkansas

STATEMENT OF BASIS

For the issuance of Draft Air Permit # 0224-AOP-RI5 AFIN: 15-00001

1. PERMITTING AUTHORITY:

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality5301 Northshore DriveNorth Little Rock, Arkansas 72118-5317

2. APPLICANT:

Green Bay Packaging Inc. (Arkansas Kraft Division)338 Highway 113Morrilton, Arkansas 72110

3. PERMIT WRITER:

Kimberly O'Guinn

4. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND NAICS CODE:

NAICS Description: Paperboard MillsNAICS Code: 322130

5. SUBMITTALS:

12/3/2012

6. REVIEWER'S NOTES:

Green Bay Packaging, Inc.-Arkansas Kraft Division (AKD) of 338 Highway 113,Morrilton, Conway County, Arkansas 72110 has owned and operated a fully integratedkraft pulp and paper mill in Oppelo, near Morrilton, since 1965. This modification is torevise Specific Conditions #149 & 158 to remove language referencing the exclusion ofSSM for SN-37, LVHC Collection System, and SN-38, HVLC Collection System, under40 CFR 63 Subpart S due to recent final rule changes by EPA. Also this modification isto allow the addition of three emergency RICE engines to the permit under 40 CFR Part60 Subpart ZZZZ (SN-41, SN-42, and SN-43).

Lastly the modification is to replace the headbox on the #2 Paper Machine (SN-25B).Since replacing the headbox is not a routine maintenance activity, evaluation of theemissions from the source for PSD applicability is required. The facility submitted aPSD evaluation which demonstrated replacing the headbox is less than the PSDsignificance level for VOC. Therefore, PSD permitting is not required at this time.

Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 2 of 16

Permitted emissions rates will increase as follows: 0.4 tons/year (tpy) PM/PM IO, 1.6 tpyS02, 0.4 tpy VOC, 0.9 tpy CO, 3.5 tpy NOx and 0.048 tpy of total HAPs.

7. COMPLIANCE STATUS:

The following summarizes the current compliance of the facility including active/pendingenforcement actions and recent compliance activities and issues.

There are no current compliance issues.

8. PSD APPLICABILITY:

a. Did the facility undergo PSD review in this permit (i.e., BACT, Modeling, etc.)? N

b. Is the facility categorized as a major source for PSD? YSingle pollutant 2: 100 tpy and on the list 0/28 or single pollutant 2: 250 tpy and not on list?

If yes, explain why this permit modification not PSD?

The facility submitted a PSD evaluation which demonstrated replacing the headbox isless than the PSD significance level for VOC. Therefore, PSD permitting is not requiredat this time.

9. GHG MAJOR SOURCE (TITLE V):

Indicate one:IZI Facility is classified as a major source for GHG and the permit includes this

designationo Facility does not have the physical potential to be a major GHG sourceo Facility has restrictions on GHG or throughput rates that limit facility to a minor

GHG source. Describe these restrictions: --------------

10. SOURCE AND POLLUTANT SPECIFIC REGULATORY APPLICABILITY:

Source PollutantRegulation

(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)

SN-04 and SN-15 NSPS Db

SN-23 NSPS BB

Facility NESHAPM

Facility MACTS

Facility MACTMM

Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 3 of 16

Source Pollutant Regulation(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)

SN-39 MACTRR

SN-04, SN-05A, SN-07,PM CAM

SN-08, SN-09

SN-41, SN-42, SN-43 NESHAP ZZZZ

11. EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULATION:

See emission change and fee calculation spreadsheet in Appendix A.

12. MODELING:

Criteria Pollutants

Emission RateNAAQS Highest

%ofPollutant Standard Averaging Time Concentration(lblhr)

(ug/rrr') (ug/nr')NAAQS

50 Annual 20.42* 40.84%PMlO 312.8

150 24-Hour 94.36* 62.91%

80 Annual 2.59 3.24%

S02 125.6 1300 3-Hour 66.89 5.15%

365 24-Hour 23.85 6.53%

10,000 8-Hour 524.65 5.25%CO 1338.2

40,000 I-Hour 2458.18 6.15%

NO x 297.9 100 Annual 5.49 5.49%* Concentration include background values. Refined Modeling was performed by thefacility.

Non-Criteria Pollutants:

1st Tier Screening (PAER)

Estimated hourly emissions from the following sources were compared to thePresumptively Acceptable Emission Rate (PAER) for each compound. The Departmenthas deemed the PAER to be the product, in lb/hr, of 0.1 1 and the Threshold Limit Value(mg/nr'), as listed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists(ACGIH).


PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =

Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/rrr') 0.11 x TLV

Acetaldehyde 45.04 4.9544 12.35 NO

Acrolein 0.23 0.0253 2.79 NO

Benzene 1.60 0.176 2.69 NO

Biphenyl 1.26 0.13 0.11 Yes

Formaldehyde 15.00 1.65 3.16 NO

Hexane 1,762.3 193.86 0.36 Yes

Hydrogen Chloride 2.98 0.3278 14.65 NO

Manganese 0.20 0.022 0.98 NO

Methanol 262.09 28.8299 84.6 NO

Methane 656.15 72.17 159.73 NO

Methyl IsobutylKetone 204.83 22.5313 0.19 Yes

Methylene Chloride 173.68 19.11 0.03 Yes

Napthalene 52.43 5.7673 0.23 Yes

Pentane 1,770.55 194.76 0.52 Yes

Phenol 19.24 2.11 0.16 Yes

Propoinaldehyde 47.53 5.2283 0.03 Yes

Styrene 85.21 9.3731 1.28 Yes

Sulfuric Acid 1.00 0.11 1.08 NO

Tetrachloroethylene 169.53 18.65 0.03 Yes

Toluene 188.41 20.7251 0.77 Yes

1,2,4 Trichloro-benzene 37.11 4.0821 0.04 Yes

Trichloroethylene 268.72 29.5592 0.28 Yes

m, p Xylene 434.19 47.7609 0.13 Yes

o Xylene 434.19 47.7609 0.11 Yes


PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =

Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/rrr') 0.11 x TLV

Acetone 1187.12 130.5832 3.44 Yes

Ammonia 17.42 1.9162 11.34 NO

2nd Tier Screening (PAIL)

AERMOD air dispersion modeling was performed on the estimated hourly emissionsfrom the following sources, in order to predict ambient concentrations beyond theproperty boundary. The Presumptively Acceptable Impact Level (PAIL) for eachcompound has been deemed by the Department to be one one-hundredth of the ThresholdLimit Value as listed by the ACGIH.

PollutantPAIL (ug/nr') = 1/100 of Modeled Concentration

Pass?Threshold Limit Value (ug/nr')

Acetaldehyde 450.04 121.40 Y

Acrolein 2.29 1.71 Y

Benzene 1.60 0.53 Y

Formaldehyde 15.00 0.61 Y

Hydrogen Chloride 29.8 2.43 Y

Manganese 2.0 0.20 Y

Methanol 2620.9 1091.17 Y

Methane 6561.5 2085.6 Y

Sulfuric Acid 10.0 0.08 Y

Ammonia 174.2 81.74 Y


13. CALCULATIONS:

EmissionFactor

Emission Factor ControlControl

SN Source(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) Equipment

Equipment Comments(AP-42, Efficiency

testing, etc.)

PM IO 1.9lxlO-3 #/# steam

PM: 3.72xlO-3 #/# steamTesting and

VOC: 3.3xlO-5 #/# steamthroughput

CO: 2.9xlO-3 #/# steam02 MulticlonesNOx: 6.6xlO- 5 #/# steam

AP-42 S02:0.025 lb/MMBtu

PM IO 1.38xlO-4 #/# steam

PM: 1.38xlO-4 #/# steam

Testing and VOC: 1.15xlO-5 #/# steamthroughput CO: 2.0x10-4 #/# steam Multiclones

04 NOx: 3.l3xlO-4 #/# steam Wet

S02: 5.6xlO-6#/# steamScrubber

AP-42NOx: 0.3 lb/MMBtu

NSPS

PM: 0.17 lb/ton BLS

PM IO: 0.43 lb/ton BLS

S02: 0.72 lb/ton BLS05A Testing VOC: 0.09 lb/ton BLS ESP 99.8%

CO: 3.08 lb/ton BLS

NOx: 1.28 lb/ton BLSLead: l.2x10-5 lb/ton BLS


Emission

ControlFactorEmission Factor Control

Equipment CommentsSN Source(lb/ton, 1b/hr, etc.) Equipment

Efficiency(AP-42,I testing, etc.)

NCASI in PM: 0.15 lb/ton BLSTechnical

PMlO: 0.1631b/tonBLSBulleting

S02: 0.005 lb/ton BLS884, AugustVenturi2004 Table VOC: 0.010 lb/ton BLS

Scrubber074.15 & CO: 0.008 lb/ton BLS

Technical NO x: 0.020 lb/ton BLSBulletin Lead: 3.4xlO-6Ib/ton BLS

858, Table TRS: 3.36xlO-2Ib/ton BLS17A

CO: 0.1 lblADTPS02: 0.064 Ibs/tonCaO

08Testing, AP- NOx: 0.70 lbs/ton CaO Wet Scrub42, NCASI VOC: 0.023 lbs/tons CaO

HVLCTesting and

Collection11throughput

System

NCASI None12

PM/PMlO:7.6 lb/l 06ft3 gas

VOC:5.5 Ib/l06ft3 gas

AP-42 CO:84Ib/l06ft3 gas FOR15

NOx: 100 lb/l 06ft3 gas

S02:0.6Ib/l06ft3 gas

16Testing andthroughput

Acetone: 2.3x10-2 1b/TTO

Methanol: 9.3xlO-2Ib/TTONone17 NCASI

Phenol: 1.9xlO-2 Ib/TTO

TRS: 3.3xlO-2Ib/TTO

10.921b S02/MMBtu None22 Testing

Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001

8 f 16Page 0

Emission

ControlControlFactor

Emission FactorEquipment CommentsSN Source

(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) EquipmentEfficiency(AP-42,

testing, etc.)

YQC: 1.2 lb/ton chips

TRS: 0.002 lb/ton chipsNone23 NCASI

4 h'Acetaldehyde: 2.7x10- lb/ton c IpS

Methanol q.Sxl Of Ib/ton/chip

None24 AP-42

YOC: 0.09 lb/ton finished paper55% of(recovered/purchased pulp)

None 310,333 tons25A NCASIYOC: 1.13 1b/ton finished paper (100% virgin

pulppulp)

45% ofYOC: 0.09lb/ton finished paper310,333 tons(recovered/purchased pulp)

None pulp25B NCASIYOC: 1.13 lb/ton finished paper (100% virgin

pulp)

PM/PMIO:7.6xl0-6lb/ft3

AP-42 S02:6.0xlO-7

Section 1.4NOx:1.0xl0-4 None26

Tables 1.4-1CO: 8.4xl0-5

and 1.4-2YOC: 5.5xl0-6

PM/PMIO:7.6xl0-6lb/ft3

AP-42 S02: 6.Oxl0-7

Section 1.4NOx: LOx10-4 None27

Tables 1.4-1CO: 8.4xl0-5

and 1.4-2YOC: 5.5xl0-6

AP-42Section 2.4

None30&

LandGEM

Total HAPs: 0.72 lb/hrNCASI TB

Acetone 0.016lb/hrNone31 No. 677 &

YOC: 0.72 lb/hrTesting TRS: 0.11 lb/hr


EmissionFactor

Emission Factor ControlSN Source Control

Equipment Comments(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) Equipment(AP-42, Efficiencytesting, etc.)

NCASI TB Total HAPs: 0.14 lb/TCaO

32No. 676 & Acetone 0.015 lb/TCaO

858 VOC: 0.14lb/TCaO None

& Testing TRS: 0.44lb/hr/tank

Slacker: lb/ton Cao Causticizer: lb/ton CaoAmmonia: 0.28 Ammonia: 0.16

36NCASI TB Acetone: 1.9x10"2 Acetone: 2.1x10-4 None

No. 676 Acetaldehyde:5.3x10"2 Acetaldehyde: 1.0x10"3Methanol:5.3x10-2 Methanol: 5.5xlO"4

37NCASITB Methanol: 0.29 lb/ADTP #2 Lime Kiln

No. 858 TRS: 0.11lb/ADTP NCG Flare

38NCASI TB TRS: 0.42x10-2 lb/ADTP #2 Lime Kiln

No. 858 Methanol: 4.3xlO-2 NCG Flare

UnpavedPMIQ: l.11lbNMT (Daily Max)

PMIQ: 0.79lb/VMT (Annual)

AP-42PM: 4.80 lb/VMT (Daily Max)

40 Chap. 13.2.1PM: 3.42 lbNMT (Annual)

Paved& 13.2.2 PMIQ: 0.89 lbNMT (Daily Max)

PMIQ: 0.82 lbNMT (Annual)PM: 4.56 lb/VMT (Daily Max)

PM: 4.23 lb/VMT (Annual)lb/hp-hr

NOx: 0.0314142 AP-42 CO: 0.00668 None

43 Table 3.3-1 Sox: 0.00205PMIQ: 0.0022

TOC-Exhaust: 0.00247


14. TESTING REQUIREMENTS:

The permit requires testing of the following sources.

SN Pollutants Test Method Test Interval Justification

PM IO 202 or 5

02VOC 25A

Every 5 yearsPrevious permit

CO 10 requirementsNO x 7E

PM IO 202 or 5

04VOC 25A

Every 5 yearsPrevious permit

S02 6C requirementsCO 10

PM IO 201 or 201AVOC 25A

Previous permit05A S02 6C Every 5 years

requirementsCO 10NO x 7E

07PM

202 or 5 Every 5 yearsPrevious permit

PM IO requirements

15 S02 6C AnnualPrevious permit

requirements

39 HAP cone.Collection Initial 40 CFR 63,

305 Annual Subpart S

15. MONITORING OR CEMS

The permittee must monitor the following parameters with CEMS or other monitoringequipment (temperature, pressure differential, etc.)

SNParameter or Pollutant Method

FrequencyReport

to be Monitored (CEM, Pressure Gauge, etc.) (YIN)

04Liquid flow to the

Strip Chart Hourly orNscrubber continuously

04Pressure drop across

Strip chart Hourly orNscrubber continuously

05ATRS TRS Monitor (Perf. Spec. #5)

Continuously NO2 O2 Monitor (Perf. Spec. #3)


SNParameter or Pollutant Method

FrequencyReport

to be Monitored (CEM, Pressure Gauge, etc.) (YIN)

05A Opacity CEM Continuously N

07 Pressure drop and Flow CPMS Continuously N

08 TRS emission rate22 O2

H2S on dry basis 12 hour average N

08 Pressure drop acrossStrip Chart

Hourly orscrubber continuously

N

08 Liquid flow to theStrip Chart

Hourly orN

scrubber continuously

15 NOx CEM Continuously N

Temperature of gases Temperature CEM accurate23 from batch digesters to be within 1% of the temperature Continuously N

incinerated being measured

37Negative pressure Anemometer, smoke tubes

38 Annual N39

Leak detection Part 60, Method 21

Condensate flow Flow meter or mass balance39 Pulp flow Continuous N

Pulp consistency Consistency meter

16. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS:

The following are items (such as throughput, fuel usage, VOC content, etc.) that must betracked and recorded.

SN Recorded Item Permit Limit Frequency Report (YIN)

Steam throughput100,000 lb/hr Monthly Y

225,000,000 lb/12 months

02 Opacity 40%

Hours used asbackup incineration 1000 hours/12 month period Hourly N

of HAPs

04 Steam throughput270,000 lb/hr Monthly Y

2,100,000,000 lb/12 months



Furniture manufacturingwaste: 3% of total fuel

Fuel combusted consumption Monthly Yeach day Scrap non-halogenated

plastics: 15% by weight of theannual total fuel

Opacity 20%

Stearn generation394,000 lb/hr

Black liquor438,000 tons/12 months

Monthly Ythroughput

05A Fuel TypeBlack liquor solids

Monthly YNatural gas

Black liquor438,000 tons/12 months Monthly Y

throughput

07Black liquor

438,000 tons/12 months Monthly Ythroughput

08 Lime throughput 84,950 tons/12 months Monthly Y

11Date C02 added to - As Used N

shower water

12Pulp throughput

310,333 tons/12 months Monthly Y(Air dried)

199,000 lb/hr DailyStearn generation 1,700,000,000 1b/12 months Monthly Y

15Amount of each fuel

combusted - Daily N

17Production or

15,012 tons/12 months Monthly Yprocess of soap

Hours of operation 1000 hours/12 months Daily Y22 Minimum

Temperature1200°F Daily Y

Production rate of301,750 air dried tons/year

25Afinished paper 170,683 bone dried kraft pulp Monthly Y

tons/year

25BProduction rate of 248,500 air dried tons/year

Monthlyfinished paper 139,650 kraft pulp tons/yearY



30 Annual waste489,000 yd3/hr Monthlyacceptance rate Y

31 Pulp throughput (air310,333 tons/12 months Monthly32 dried) Y

36 Lime throughput 84,950 tons/12 months Monthly Y

Excess emission Emissions in excess ofSemi-annual Yreleases NESHAP limit of 1%

37 MaintenanceAs Used NActivities -

Inspection of LVHC - As Used N

Excess emission Emissions in excess ofSemi-annual Yreleases NESHAP limit of 4%

38 MaintenanceAs Used NActivities -

Inspection of HVLC - As Used N

39Mass, flow and

General recording Monthly Yconsistency of pulp

5, 7, andMonthly N8 PM Established

Malfunction AsN-

Applicable

41,42, Hours of operation 500 hours per calendar year Monthly Y43 Maintenance Check: 100

Hours of operation hours/year As Needed NNon-emergency: 50 hours/yr

17. OPACITY:

SN Opacity Justification for limit Compliance Mechanism

02 40 Previous permit limit Daily

04 20 (NSPS) Flow Rate & Pressure Differential

05A 20 Previous permit limit Daily



SN Opacity Justification for limit Compliance Mechanism

08 20Previous permit limit N/A

22 20


26,27 5 Previous permit limit Burning natural gas

41,42,43 20 19.503 Annually

18. DELETED CONDITIONS:

Former SC I Justification for removal

N/A

19. GROUP A INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Group AEmissions (tpy)

Source NameCategory PM/PM HAPs

S02 VOC CO NOx10 Single Total

Pocket Vent System1

Heater #1 (SN-28)Pocket Vent System

1Heater #2 (SN-29)

Defoamer Tank3(Pulp Mill)

Used Oil Tank 3 0.0001

North Diesel Storage3 0.0008Tank

South Diesel Storage3 0.0006Tank

Diesel Oil Storage3 0.0004Tank

50% Caustic Storage4

Tanks Recovery Area50% Caustic Storage

4Tanks Tall Oil Area50% Caustic Storage

Tanks Secondary 4Recovery Area


Group A Emissions (tpy)Source Name

Category PM/PM HAPsS02 VOC CO NO x

10 Single TotalEmissions From

5Laboratory VentsSulfuric Acid Tanks

13(4)Small Fuel Oil Tanks

13 0.01(SN-33)

Large Fuel Oil Tank 13 0.20

Intermediate BlackLiquor Storage Tanks 13 0.70

(2)Heavy Black Liquor

13 0.88Storage Tanks (3)White Liquor Storage

13 0.91Tanks (4)High Density Pulp

13 0.31Storage Tanks (2)

Cooling Towers 13

Salt Cake Storage Tank 13

Muriatic Acid Tote Bin 13

Tall Oil Brine Storage13

Tanks (3)Calcium Carbonate

13Storage

Alum Storage 13

Starch Cooker 13

Sludge Press Area -13

Vent Exhaust

Ferric Sulfate Storage 13

N-Sol 32 Storage 13

Secondary Fiber Plant 13 1.06

#1 Lime Silos (Sodium13 0.20

Carbonate) (SN-18)#2 Lime Silos (Sodium

13 0.20Carbonate) (SN-19)

Starch Silo (SN-20) 13 0.60


Group AEmissions (tpy)

Source NameCategory PM/PM HAPs

S02 VOC CO NOx Single Total10

Lime Silo - Water13 0.20

Plant (SN-2I)Turpentine Storage

13Tank (SN-34)

Turpentine Loading13 0.52

Operation (SN-35) e

Gasoline Storage Tank 13 0.28

20. VOIDED, SUPERSEDED, OR SUBSUMED PERMITS:

List all active permits voided/superseded/subsumed by the issuance of this permit.

Permit #

0224-AOP-RI4

21. CONCURRENCE BY:

The following supervisor concurs with the permitting decision.

Karen Cerney, P.E.

APPENDIX A - EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULAnON

Fee Calculation for Major Source

Revised 08-20-12

Facility Name: Green Bay Packaging Incorporated,Arkansas Kraft DivisionPermit Number:0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001

$/ton factorPermit Type

Minor Modification Fee $Minimum Modification Fee $Renewal with Minor Modification $

Check if Facility Holds an Active Minor Source or MinorSource General PermitIf Hold Active Permit, Amt of Last Annual Air Permit Invoice $

Total Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)Initial Title V Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)

22.97Minor Mod

5001000500

o4.7

Annual Chargeable Emissions (tpy)

Permit Fee $3754.59

500

HAPs not included in VOC or PM:

Air Contaminants:

Chlorine, Hydrazine, HCI, HF, Methyl Chloroform, Methylene Chloride,Phosphine, Tetrachloroethylene, Titanium Tetrachloride

All air contaminants are chargeable unless they are included in othertotals (e.g., H2S04 in condensible PM, H2S in TRS, etc.)

Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable

Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions

PM ~ 1027.5 1027.9 0.4 0.4 1027.9

PM 10t-

636 636.4 0.4e

SOz ~ 267.1 267.5 0.4 0.4 267.5

VOC ~ 1347.7 1348.1 0.4 0.4 1348.1

CO r 1393.3 1394.2 0.9

NOx ~ 986.5 990 3.5 3.5 990

Pb 1::1 0.27 0.27 0 0 0.27

Acetaldehyde 44.18 44.19 0.01

Acrolein r 11.87 11.88 0.01

Antimony 0 0 0

Arsenic f' 0 0 0

Benzene r 11.65 11.67 0.02

Biphenyl 0.35 0.35 0

Cadmium r 0 0 0

Carbon Tetrachloride 0 0 0

Chloroform 0 0 0

Chromium 0 0 0

Cobalt r 0 0 0



Cumene r 0 0 0

Ethylene Dichloride r" 0 0 0

Formaldehyde r 13.65 13.67 0.02

Hexane 1.58 1.58 0

Hydrochloric Acid* ~ 63.17 63.17 0 0 63.17

Manganese r" 4.3 4.3 0

Mercury r- 0 0 0

Methanol 247.48 247.48 0

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone r" 0.63 0.63 0

Napthalene r 0.86 0.87 0.01

Nickel r 0 0 0

Phenol r 0.31 0.31 0

Propionaldehyde r 0.12 0.12 0

Selenium f' 0 0 0

Styrene 5.47 5.47 0

Toluene r 3.11 3.12 0.01

1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene r- 0.17 0.17 0

1,1,2 Trichloroethane r~' 0 0 0

Trichloroethylene r 0.97 0.97 0

m,pXylene r 0.43 0.43 0

o Xylene r- 0.38 0.38 0

Acetone* W 8.3 8.3 0 0 8.3

Ammonia* W 44.97 44.97 0 0 44.97

Benzaldehyde r 0 0 0

Butane r 1.85 1.85 0

Copper* W 0 0 0 0 0

Cyclohexanone 0 0 0

p-Cymene 0 0 0

Dimethyl Sulfider-j 0 0 0

1,2 Dichloroethylene r 0 0 0

Dichloromethane 0 0 0

Dimethyl Disulfide r 0 0 0

Ethane r: 2.73 2.73 0

Ethanol 0 0 0

N-Hexane r-0 0, 0

Hydrogen Sulfide* f';;; 0 0 0 0 0Isopropanol r 0 0 0

Methane r 701.62 701.62 0



Methyl Mercaptan r 0 0 0

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0 0 0

Pentane 2.29 2.29 0

a-Pinene 0 0 0

b-Pinene 0 0 0

Propane 1.41 1.41 0

Silver* 0 0 0

Sulfuric Acid* !\i 4.38 4.38 0 0 4.38

Terpenes W 0 0 0 0 0

TRS r'" 203.51 203.51 0

Methylene Chloride r 0.11 0.11 0

Tetrachloroethylene r 0.11 0.11 0

1,3 Butadiene 0 0.0005 0.0005

Propylene 0 0 0

Documents

STATEMENT OF BASIS For the issuance ofDraft Air Permit ... · STATEMENT OF BASIS For the issuance ofDraft Air Permit # 0224-AOP-RI5 AFIN: 15-00001 1. PERMITTING AUTHORITY: Arkansas