Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
-1-
STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE
PROPERTY BY THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE
UNMISTAKABLE COLLUSION AMONG THE EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL BRANCHES
WITH WALL STREET AND SILICON VALLEY IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK ELLICIT
COMPARISONS TO HITLER
(Sep. 9, 2013)—A
coordinated effort to
confiscate the social
networking invention of
Columbus, Ohio-based
innovator Leader
Technologies (Leader) by the
Obama administration is now
overwhelming.
Former IBM executive and
economist, Alan Stern, said,
“I have been closely
following Leader v.
Facebook. We need to thank
Leader’s chairman, Michael
McKibben, for his invention
and contribution to large-scale collaboration capabilities. We also need to stop
rewarding the confiscation of Leader’s property by Facebook.” Stern was one of
IBM’s chief architects of IBM’s client-server strategy.
Stern continued, “My grandparents were murdered in Nazi concentration camps at
Dachau and Auschwitz after their property and business had been confiscated. I
pledged in their memory never to be silent in the face of similar moral
obscenities.”
Fig. 1—Uncritical Users of Facebook? Hitler’s Brownshirts ca. 1938. Is
this type of unthinking loyalty a reflect ion of the unthinking loyalty of
Facebook users, despite proof that they are using Leader
Technologies’ private property that Facebook has stolen?
IS THIS RECENT HISTORY ALREADY REPEATING ITSELF IN
THE SECRET AND UNITELLIGBLE DIGITAL WORLD?
-2-
“In my mind, Facebook conduct
the digital arena rivals Hitler’s
obscenities,” Stern said.
“Unthinking Facebook users are
like Hitler’s Brownshirts who,
despite Hitler’s abuses, pledged
unswerving loyalty to the Fuehrer
without realizing that their
conduct only emboldened his
tyrannical behavior.”
Despite Facebook having been
proved guilty on 11 of 11 counts
on infringing Leader’s patent, the
federal courts and White House
have stonewalled justice and
handed the decision to Facebook
despite the overwhelming
evidence against them. This
conduct has insured the Obama
White House and Facebook
continue to have maintain contact
with Facebook’s billion users (of
the technology they stole from
Leader Technologies).
Stern likened Facebook’s conduct
to Hitler’s overwhelming use of
force in the takeover of the
Sudetenland on Oct. 10, 1938,
and “Kristallnacht,” on Nov. 9,
1938. During Kristallnacht
(“Night of the Broken Glass”)
Hitler attacked and confiscated
Jewish private property and
Fig. 2—Hitler’s troops occupied the Sudetenland on October 10,
1938. The world’s response was appeasement. Facebook’s drive
to overrun those from whom they have stolen is analogous.
Fig. 3—The New York Times, Nov. 11, 1938 reporting on
Kristallnacht. Jewish property was destroyed and confiscated by
the state. The Obama administrations reliance on Facebook
amounts to similar state-sponsored confiscation.
-3-
murdered almost 100 souls in a coordinated 24-hour assault.
The world’s reaction to Hitler rolling over the Sudetenland was muted. British
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler with good faith gestures, to
no avail. The lesson of history is that tyrants and thieves cannot be appeased. They
can only be stopped.
It took the world over six years to bring down Hitler. On Apr. 30, 1945, Hitler
committed suicide, just five days after the link-up of American and Soviet forces at
Torgau. Leader Technologies’ chairman and lead inventor, Michael McKibben,
said, “my father-in-law, Jerry Hoovler, was a 20-year old foot soldier in the 69th
Infantry Division that linked-up with Soviet forces that day.”
McKibben said, “anyone can see from the facts that Leader’s shareholders are the
victims of state-sponsored property confiscation. Key members of this
Administration and their friends are benefiting from our social networking
invention, while our shareholders go uncompensated for the risks that they took to
support our development.”
McKibben pointed out numerous telltale signs of this overwhelming Hitler-like
show of force by the Obama state, including:
• President Obama (with Michelle and various PACs) has over 47 million
“likes”—dramatically more than any other politician on the planet.
• Obama’s State Department recently paid Facebook $630,000 for more likes.
• Obama’s Patent Office has almost 15,000 likes—even encouraging
employee signups before the Leader v. Facebook trial, then suspiciously
ordering a 3rd reexamination to try and kill the patent off.
• Most U.S. Senators and Congresspersons now feel forced to rely on
Facebook to counter Obama’s overwhelming advantage in reaching LOFO
voters (low-information voters). Is this Neville Chamberlain-like
appeasement?
• Obama’s campaign contributors read like a Who’s Who of Facebook
insiders.
-4-
• Obama’s insiders include numerous Russian oligarchs with close ties to the
Kremlin and Wall Street.
• These Obama-Facebook insiders fleeced the American public multiple times
o first in the 2008 bailout,
o second in the “green” energy stimulus, and
o third in the Facebook IPO,
o not counting the 10x leveraging of those funds via overseas banks to
generate factors more payola.
• THREE UNINTELLEIGBLE WORLDS JOINED FORCES TO FOOL THE PUBLIC:
(1) LAWYERS, (2) PROGRAMMERS, AND (3) FINANCE: Obama-Facebook’s
intertwined associations with Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and a gaggle of
corrupt Washington law firms
Stern emphasized, “No one can resist an overwhelming use of force by a state
authority, like Leader Technologies has experienced. When every federal judge in
this case had close relationships with and held stock in Facebook and gets away
with it, that is a gross abuse of power.”
“Hitler’s confiscation of my grandparent’s property was illegal according to
German law. The German courts turned a blind eye because they were
collaborating with a tyrant. The American court’s confiscation of Leader’s
valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make
President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question, Stern said, “If he benefits
personally from this abuse without stopping it, then yes.”
McKibben said, “My father-in-law was a part of the American 69th Infantry
Division that broke Hitler’s back on Apr. 25, 2013—known as ‘The Meeting at the
Elbe.’ This event was symbolic of a world that said to Hitler and his cronies that
abuse of property and privacy cannot be tolerated in civilized society.”
Ironically, the Cold War began within days of The Meeting at the Elbe. But for a
brief moment in the streets of Torgau, the world had raised the bar. To this day
-5-
Soviet and American veterans meet in Torgau to remember this turning point in
world history.
“Like the Founders of America who risked their lives and fortunes to create
America, my father, my father-in-law and more recently my nephew in Iraq placed
themselves in harm’s way to protect constitutional law from such tyrants,”
McKibben said.
“I am struck by President John Adams admonition that in a democracy, property
and privacy must be revered as sacred as the laws of God. Adams observed that
tyranny and anarchy start when these principles are violated.”
“The President, Patent Office, Facebook and Facebook’s crony-network are
benefiting from our social networking invention. None of them has lifted a finger
to protect us. In fact, they’ve done the opposite. They have collaborated with
Facebook’s law firms and financiers to line their pockets, press their agendas, and
ensure that our shareholders never see justice.”
“No company can fight state-sponsored confiscation of property. At least with
imminent domain, there is compensation. However, in the case of Leader and its
shareholders, there is only utter silence from those we have elected to protect the
U.S. Constitution and private property.”
McKibben concluded, “The evidence that Leader Technologies has been cheated
by this administration and a compliant judiciary is clear. What has happened to us
is not civilized. We can only hope that once the American people and Congress
learn of this injustice, the back of this collusion will be broken, just like Hitler’s on
Apr. 25, 1945 in the Meeting at the Elbe.”
Expressing bipartisan support for Leader Technologies, University of Minnesota
history professor emeritus Hy Berman, said “If intellectual property theft by the
powerful and well-connected is not stopped, future innovation is jeopardized.”
Professor Berman was former political adviser to Vice President Hubert
Humphrey.