5
-1- STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY BY THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE UNMISTAKABLE COLLUSION AMONG THE EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL BRANCHES WITH WALL STREET AND SILICON VALLEY IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK ELLICIT COMPARISONS TO HITLER (Sep. 9, 2013)A coordinated effort to confiscate the social networking invention of Columbus, Ohio-based innovator Leader Technologies (Leader) by the Obama administration is now overwhelming. Former IBM executive and economist, Alan Stern, said, “I have been closely following Leader v. Facebook. We need to thank Leader’s chairman, Michael McKibben, for his invention and contribution to large-scale collaboration capabilities. We also need to stop rewarding the confiscation of Leader’s property by Facebook.” Stern was one of IBM’s chief architects of IBM’s client-server strategy. Stern continued, “My grandparents were murdered in Nazi concentration camps at Dachau and Auschwitz after their property and business had been confiscated. I pledged in their memory never to be silent in the face of similar moral obscenities.Fig. 1—Uncritical Users of Facebook? Hitler’s Brownshirts ca. 1938. Is this type of unthinking loyalty a reflect ion of the unthinking loyalty of Facebook users, despite proof that they are using Leader Technologies’ private property that Facebook has stolen? IS THIS RECENT HISTORY ALREADY REPEATING ITSELF IN THE SECRET AND UNITELLIGBLE DIGITAL WORLD?

STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

-1-

STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE

PROPERTY BY THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE

UNMISTAKABLE COLLUSION AMONG THE EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIAL BRANCHES

WITH WALL STREET AND SILICON VALLEY IN LEADER V. FACEBOOK ELLICIT

COMPARISONS TO HITLER

(Sep. 9, 2013)—A

coordinated effort to

confiscate the social

networking invention of

Columbus, Ohio-based

innovator Leader

Technologies (Leader) by the

Obama administration is now

overwhelming.

Former IBM executive and

economist, Alan Stern, said,

“I have been closely

following Leader v.

Facebook. We need to thank

Leader’s chairman, Michael

McKibben, for his invention

and contribution to large-scale collaboration capabilities. We also need to stop

rewarding the confiscation of Leader’s property by Facebook.” Stern was one of

IBM’s chief architects of IBM’s client-server strategy.

Stern continued, “My grandparents were murdered in Nazi concentration camps at

Dachau and Auschwitz after their property and business had been confiscated. I

pledged in their memory never to be silent in the face of similar moral

obscenities.”

Fig. 1—Uncritical Users of Facebook? Hitler’s Brownshirts ca. 1938. Is

this type of unthinking loyalty a reflect ion of the unthinking loyalty of

Facebook users, despite proof that they are using Leader

Technologies’ private property that Facebook has stolen?

IS THIS RECENT HISTORY ALREADY REPEATING ITSELF IN

THE SECRET AND UNITELLIGBLE DIGITAL WORLD?

Page 2: STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

-2-

“In my mind, Facebook conduct

the digital arena rivals Hitler’s

obscenities,” Stern said.

“Unthinking Facebook users are

like Hitler’s Brownshirts who,

despite Hitler’s abuses, pledged

unswerving loyalty to the Fuehrer

without realizing that their

conduct only emboldened his

tyrannical behavior.”

Despite Facebook having been

proved guilty on 11 of 11 counts

on infringing Leader’s patent, the

federal courts and White House

have stonewalled justice and

handed the decision to Facebook

despite the overwhelming

evidence against them. This

conduct has insured the Obama

White House and Facebook

continue to have maintain contact

with Facebook’s billion users (of

the technology they stole from

Leader Technologies).

Stern likened Facebook’s conduct

to Hitler’s overwhelming use of

force in the takeover of the

Sudetenland on Oct. 10, 1938,

and “Kristallnacht,” on Nov. 9,

1938. During Kristallnacht

(“Night of the Broken Glass”)

Hitler attacked and confiscated

Jewish private property and

Fig. 2—Hitler’s troops occupied the Sudetenland on October 10,

1938. The world’s response was appeasement. Facebook’s drive

to overrun those from whom they have stolen is analogous.

Fig. 3—The New York Times, Nov. 11, 1938 reporting on

Kristallnacht. Jewish property was destroyed and confiscated by

the state. The Obama administrations reliance on Facebook

amounts to similar state-sponsored confiscation.

Page 3: STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

-3-

murdered almost 100 souls in a coordinated 24-hour assault.

The world’s reaction to Hitler rolling over the Sudetenland was muted. British

Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler with good faith gestures, to

no avail. The lesson of history is that tyrants and thieves cannot be appeased. They

can only be stopped.

It took the world over six years to bring down Hitler. On Apr. 30, 1945, Hitler

committed suicide, just five days after the link-up of American and Soviet forces at

Torgau. Leader Technologies’ chairman and lead inventor, Michael McKibben,

said, “my father-in-law, Jerry Hoovler, was a 20-year old foot soldier in the 69th

Infantry Division that linked-up with Soviet forces that day.”

McKibben said, “anyone can see from the facts that Leader’s shareholders are the

victims of state-sponsored property confiscation. Key members of this

Administration and their friends are benefiting from our social networking

invention, while our shareholders go uncompensated for the risks that they took to

support our development.”

McKibben pointed out numerous telltale signs of this overwhelming Hitler-like

show of force by the Obama state, including:

• President Obama (with Michelle and various PACs) has over 47 million

“likes”—dramatically more than any other politician on the planet.

• Obama’s State Department recently paid Facebook $630,000 for more likes.

• Obama’s Patent Office has almost 15,000 likes—even encouraging

employee signups before the Leader v. Facebook trial, then suspiciously

ordering a 3rd reexamination to try and kill the patent off.

• Most U.S. Senators and Congresspersons now feel forced to rely on

Facebook to counter Obama’s overwhelming advantage in reaching LOFO

voters (low-information voters). Is this Neville Chamberlain-like

appeasement?

• Obama’s campaign contributors read like a Who’s Who of Facebook

insiders.

Page 4: STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

-4-

• Obama’s insiders include numerous Russian oligarchs with close ties to the

Kremlin and Wall Street.

• These Obama-Facebook insiders fleeced the American public multiple times

o first in the 2008 bailout,

o second in the “green” energy stimulus, and

o third in the Facebook IPO,

o not counting the 10x leveraging of those funds via overseas banks to

generate factors more payola.

• THREE UNINTELLEIGBLE WORLDS JOINED FORCES TO FOOL THE PUBLIC:

(1) LAWYERS, (2) PROGRAMMERS, AND (3) FINANCE: Obama-Facebook’s

intertwined associations with Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and a gaggle of

corrupt Washington law firms

Stern emphasized, “No one can resist an overwhelming use of force by a state

authority, like Leader Technologies has experienced. When every federal judge in

this case had close relationships with and held stock in Facebook and gets away

with it, that is a gross abuse of power.”

“Hitler’s confiscation of my grandparent’s property was illegal according to

German law. The German courts turned a blind eye because they were

collaborating with a tyrant. The American court’s confiscation of Leader’s

valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make

President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question, Stern said, “If he benefits

personally from this abuse without stopping it, then yes.”

McKibben said, “My father-in-law was a part of the American 69th Infantry

Division that broke Hitler’s back on Apr. 25, 2013—known as ‘The Meeting at the

Elbe.’ This event was symbolic of a world that said to Hitler and his cronies that

abuse of property and privacy cannot be tolerated in civilized society.”

Ironically, the Cold War began within days of The Meeting at the Elbe. But for a

brief moment in the streets of Torgau, the world had raised the bar. To this day

Page 5: STATE-SPONSORED CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE …...valuable patent property is equally illegal.” Stern then asked, “Does this make President Obama a tyrant?” Answering his own question,

-5-

Soviet and American veterans meet in Torgau to remember this turning point in

world history.

“Like the Founders of America who risked their lives and fortunes to create

America, my father, my father-in-law and more recently my nephew in Iraq placed

themselves in harm’s way to protect constitutional law from such tyrants,”

McKibben said.

“I am struck by President John Adams admonition that in a democracy, property

and privacy must be revered as sacred as the laws of God. Adams observed that

tyranny and anarchy start when these principles are violated.”

“The President, Patent Office, Facebook and Facebook’s crony-network are

benefiting from our social networking invention. None of them has lifted a finger

to protect us. In fact, they’ve done the opposite. They have collaborated with

Facebook’s law firms and financiers to line their pockets, press their agendas, and

ensure that our shareholders never see justice.”

“No company can fight state-sponsored confiscation of property. At least with

imminent domain, there is compensation. However, in the case of Leader and its

shareholders, there is only utter silence from those we have elected to protect the

U.S. Constitution and private property.”

McKibben concluded, “The evidence that Leader Technologies has been cheated

by this administration and a compliant judiciary is clear. What has happened to us

is not civilized. We can only hope that once the American people and Congress

learn of this injustice, the back of this collusion will be broken, just like Hitler’s on

Apr. 25, 1945 in the Meeting at the Elbe.”

Expressing bipartisan support for Leader Technologies, University of Minnesota

history professor emeritus Hy Berman, said “If intellectual property theft by the

powerful and well-connected is not stopped, future innovation is jeopardized.”

Professor Berman was former political adviser to Vice President Hubert

Humphrey.