Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
State of New Jersey
May 29, 2008
The Asset Evaluation Program: A Progress Report
Council of State Governments 2008 Spring Conference
1
The Fiscal and Transportation Funding Problems Facing New
Jersey are Not Unique…..
23 states, including New Jersey, are facing budget shortfalls in 2009
New Jersey, like many states, is facing significant liabilities in pension and health care costs
All states face rising costs and shrinking federal support for transportation investment
…..But our approach to tackling them is:
We recognized the direct correlation between New Jersey‟s fiscal constraints and our inability to invest sufficient
funds in transportation and infrastructure
The asset evaluation review began in 2006 resulting in a proposal that upon implementation was capable of
producing a positive and transformative effect on several key issues confronting the State and brought the scope
of these challenges into the public dialogue
Provided long term investment in the toll roads
Provided long term funding for investment in the statewide transportation network
Provided funds to pay off one half of the State‟s debt
22
Where we Started:
The Problem - Financial Emergency20 years of short-sighted financial decisions by both parties left us in a deep hole
Misspending
Overspending
Irresponsible Borrowing
3
New Jersey Is Not Funding all of our Long-Term
Obligations
„98 „99 „00 „01 „02 „03 „04 „05 „06
5
10
15
30
20
25
$35
Net Tax-Supported Debt Outstanding ($ in Billions)
Fiscal Year
„07
CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate
= debt issued since June 2007
„97„96„92 „93 „94 „95„91„90
FY 2008 Funding of Long-Term Obligations
Transportation Capital Funding
9.8
4.9
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Annually Required
Contributions FY 2008
Actual Contribution
FY 2008
($bn) Post Retirement Medical ExpenseUnfunded Pension ExpenseDebt Service
42.0
4.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
10-year Capital Plan Existing State
Funding ¹
($bn)
1 Available Transportation Trust Fund funding
44
Transportation Investment Continues to Require Focus and
MoneyNew Jersey… most densely populated corridor state
Highly dependent on our transportation network
Almost $2 billion in annual federal funding at risk after 2011
$40 billion in transportation needs over the next decade for safety and
congestion relief
– 700 deficient bridges
– 10,000 miles of highways to be resurfaced
- 2nd rail tunnel under the Hudson River
5
Governor Corzine Chose to Investigate Public-Private
Partnerships (PPPs) as a Possible Solution…
30yrs 99yrs 30yrs 99yrs
Net R
evenue
Net R
evenue
Municipal Revenue
ProjectionsMunicipal Bond
Investor Loan
Capacity
Private Sector
Projections
Incremental Value
Generated by
Private Sector Risk
Tolerance
Municipal Model PPP / Concession Model
Capitalization of Net Revenues from an Infrastructure Asset
PPPs can
Provide the public sector access to private sector discipline, expertise, efficiencies and
sources of capital
Allow the public sector to transfer financial, construction and operating risks
Significant Value can be Generated by Private Sector Financing
6
Where Did We Start?
The starting point for our work was to inventory the major State Asset Classes and
identify those that merit the State’s near-term focus
Asset Classes
Key Criteria Lottery Naming Rights
Rights-of-Way
Toll Roads
Real Estate Development/ Train Stations
Convention Centers, Stadiums
and Other 1
Newly-Tolled
Facilities Waterways and Ports Hospitals
Student Loans Transit Airports
Water/ Wastewater
Facilities Existing Prisons
Solid Waste
Facilities
Recreation Facilities (Parks) Equipment
Stand Alone Operation
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + -
Output/Service Delivery Driven
+ + + NA NA + + + NA + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -
Substantial Operating
Component + + + NA NA + + + NA + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + NA
Alternative Use of Asset
- - - + + + + + + + + + + + - - - - - + + - - - - - - - - + - - -
Innovation in Delivery
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - -
Long-Term Availability
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -
Minimum Transfer of
Social Control + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - - + - + - - - - - - - + - - - + +
Manageable Security/
Safety Issues + + + + + + + + + - + - - - + + + - - - + - - - - - + + + + +
Risks Commercial in
Nature + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - - + + - - + +
Manageable Size
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - - -
Overall Potential
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / - - -
+++ Very Favorable ++ Favorable + Somewhat Favorable – Somewhat Unfavorable – – Unfavorable – – – Very Unfavorable NA: Not Applicable
Note:
1 Other includes racetracks, concert halls and meeting spaces
7
The State‟s Asset Review
Feasibility 3
Re
lati
ve V
alu
e 1
High
Low
Low High
Fiber Optic Network ⁴
AC International Airport
HESAA
Development Rights
at NJ Transit Stations
NJ Turnpike ⁴
NJ Lottery ⁶
NJ Turnpike
Authority Assets
NJSEA ²Naming Rights
Newly-Tolled Facilities
HOT Lanes
GS Parkway 4
AC Expressway
PNC Bank
Arts Center 4
Source: UBS report dated November 2006
Notes:
1 Relative value net of any directly associated debt
2 Reflects a group of 7 venues
3 Indicates likelihood of completion; Includes Market Acceptance, Risk
Profiles and Relative Lack of Complexity
The State began a review in the fall of 2006 to determine which assets could generate value
While several different opportunities were identified, the monetization of toll roads was identified as
being the most valuable, feasible and market ready
4 Included in NJ Turnpike Authority Assets which are not individually
available without total NJ Turnpike Authority debt defeasance
5 Bubble size indicates the level of market readiness for each Asset
6 Value is net of projected reductions to General Fund contributions
Market Readiness⁵
Low Medium High
8
Summary of the Initial Phase of Study
The initial evaluation process can be summarized as follows:
Asset Class EvaluationIndividual/Discrete Asset Evaluation
Market/Investor Interest Assessment
Pathfinder Analysis
¨ Net Value to the State
¨ Feasibility
¨ Market Readiness
¨ The study concluded that the Assets generally fall into four Tiers based on their Net Value to the State, Feasibility and Market Readiness
¨ All of the Assets in Tier 1 and Tier 2 should be considered in P
¨ Atlantic City Expressway
¨ Development Rights at New Jersey
Transit Stations
¨ Garden State Parkway
¨ New Jersey Lottery
¨ New Jersey Turnpike
¨ Atlantic City International Airport
¨ Fiber Optic Network
¨ High Occupancy Toll Lanes (“ HOT Lanes” )
¨ Naming Rights
¨ Newly-Tolled Facilities
¨ PNC Bank Arts Center
Tier 1 Tier 2
Asset Class EvaluationIndividual/Discrete Asset Evaluation
Market/Investor Interest Assessment
Pathfinder Analysis
¨ Net Value to the State
¨ Feasibility
¨ Market Readiness
Asset Class EvaluationIndividual/Discrete Asset Evaluation
Market/Investor Interest Assessment
Pathfinder Analysis
¨ Net Value to the State
¨ Feasibility
¨ Market Readiness
¨ The study
¨ All of the Assets in Tier 1 and Tier 2 should be considered in Phase 2. These include:
¨ Atlantic City Expressway
¨ Development Rights at New Jersey
Transit Stations
¨ Garden State Parkway
¨ New Jersey Lottery
¨ New Jersey Turnpike
¨ Atlantic City International Airport
¨ Fiber Optic Network
¨ High Occupancy Toll Lanes (“ HOT Lanes” )
¨ Naming Rights
¨ Newly-Tolled Facilities
¨ PNC Bank Arts Center
Tier 1 Tier 2
¨ Atlantic City Expressway
¨ Development Rights at New Jersey
Transit Stations
¨ Garden State Parkway
¨ New Jersey Lottery
¨ New Jersey Turnpike
¨ Atlantic City International Airport
¨ Fiber Optic Network
¨ High Occupancy Toll Lanes (“ HOT Lanes” )
¨ Naming Rights
¨ Newly-Tolled Facilities
¨ PNC Bank Arts Center
Tier 1Tier 1 Tier 2Tier 2
9
How Can we “Unlock” the Value of our Assets?
Public Authority Model
Public Benefit Company
“PBC”
Long-Term Concession
IPO
Transaction
Description
Authority is created / retained by the State and given ability to develop, finance, manage, and operate the asset
State assigns the right to set and collect tolls and manage the roads for a defined period of time per parameters stipulated in an agreement in exchange for monetary payment(s) by a stakeholder-controlled entity for the benefit of the road users and the transportation system in the State of New Jersey
State assigns the right to set and collect tolls and manage the roads for a defined period of time per parameters stipulated in an agreement in exchange for monetary payment(s) by a private sector concessionaire
State assigns the right to set and collect tolls and manage the roads for a defined period of time per parameters stipulated in an agreement in exchange for monetary payment(s) by a concessionaire whose shares will be publicly traded
10
Public Authority Model Public Benefit Company
“PBC” Long-Term Concession IPO
Generate Net Cash Proceeds
Pay Down Debt
Capital Investment
Limit Toll Increases
Retain Upside
Fin
an
cia
l
Limit Execution Risk
Maintain or Enhance Service Quality and Safety
– Impose penalties for noncompliance
Protect Employees
– Preserve long-term collective bargaining ability
– Pension parity
–
Shift Maintenance Cost & Capital Ex Risk
Preserve Existing Contracting Structure
Po
licy
Maintain Regulatory Oversight
Key: Meets/ Maximizes objective Partially meets objective Counter to / Does not meet objective
How are Key Considerations of the State Addressed in
these Alternative PPP Structures?
1111
Can We Capture the Value of Our Toll Roads within
the Parameters of The Corzine Principles?
New Jersey’s roadways will not be sold; and they will not be leased to a for-profit or
foreign operator
Allowable use of proceeds (reducing State debt and capital investments) will be identified
upfront and subject to a public and/or legislative approval with safeguards against diversions
for other uses
New Jersey citizens will retain ownership and the benefits from initial proceeds and
ongoing operations
Safety, maintenance and operating standards will be provided at current or improved levels
Sufficient funding to meet the long-term capital needs required to improve our roadways
and reduce congestion will be provided
Terms and conditions of employment for current employees and contractors will remain
unchanged with prevailing wage and competitive contracting procedures retained
Toll schedules will be open, predictable and available to the public
There will be a substantial, open and public discussion in advance of any transaction. I will
hold 21 town hall meetings in 21 counties
1212
The Proposed Solution: The Public Benefit Corporation
(PBC)
Public Benefit Corporation -
Non Profit Operator of the Toll Roads
State Agency -
Owner of the Toll Roads
Citizens Oversight Board, Inc. -
Representing the Public Interest
Concession
Initial payment and
future periodic
payments
Vote for PBC Board
Members
Agreement
PBC Board of
Directors
Lenders/
Bondholders
Attorney General
Oversight of non-profit
organizations
Public reporting
13
What Does the PBC Solution Accomplish?
Provides for significant capital investment in the tolled facilities
Provides a long term funding source for statewide transportation investment by retaining the excess funds from PBC operations within the State rather than providing returns to external equity investors
Significantly reduces the State‟s transportation and general fund debt
Creates an independent, non-governmentally operated or controlled non-profit corporation to operate, invest and maintain the tolled facilities more like a business
What it does
What it doesn’t do
Generate funding for long term pension or health benefit liabilities
Provide funding for non-transportation infrastructure investment
1414
How does PBC Raise Funds to Pay for the Right to Operate,
Maintain and Invest in the Toll Roads?
First increase is in 2010 and is a maximum of 50% plus inflation adjustment
Three other increases of up to a maximum of 50% plus inflation adjustment
will come in 2014, 2018, and 2022; then only inflationary increases thereafter
New Jersey Turnpike 1
Concession Year 2010 2014 2018 2022
Passenger Vehicle
Average Trip 2
$2.05 3.45 5.85 9.85
Garden State Parkway 1
Concession Year 2010 2014 2018 2022
Average Trip 3
0.60 0.95 1.60 2.70
Atlantic City Expressway 1
Concession Year 2010 2014 2018 2022
$0.50 Toll Barrier 4
0.85 1.45 2.40 4.05
Notes:
1 Assumes 3% Annual CPI Increases
2 Assumes 22.9 mile average trip
3 Assumes 15 mile average trip
4 $0.50 ramp tolls are the majority of the ACE toll points
Proposed Toll Schedule
PBC issues its own bonds secured by the revenues to be derived from the tolls
collected pursuant to the long term concession agreement
1515
NJ Tolls within the Historical Context of Inflation
Notes
1 US Bureau of Labor Statistics
2 New York Times and Associates Press
3 Average ticket price based on Goodman & Company survey of all admissions to movie theaters
4 The Garden State Parkway end-to-end toll is based on average of a full length trip northbound and full length trip southbound
Over the period 1950-2007 prices on everyday staple items have increased far more
Since they opened, tolls for traveling the full length of these roads have increased modestly and have
failed to keep pace with inflation
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
1,400
1,500
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007
Ind
exed
Pri
cin
g
CPI Bread¹ US Postage Stamp
New Jersey Minimum Wage¹ Hamburger² Movie Ticket³
New Jersey Turnpike Garden State Parkway⁴ Atlantic City Expressway
16
Where is the State of New Jersey in the Process Today?
The Administration is currently focused on adopting a Fiscal 2009 Budget that is
lower than the one adopted in Fiscal 2008
The Governor has indicated that he does not believe there are sufficient votes to
pass the PBC plan as proposed
Alternative ideas that are being proposed by members of the legislature and other
interested parties are being reviewed
The Governor remains committed to finding solutions to the State‟s significant
problems, including:
Fiscal Restructuring
–Fiscal 2009 proposed budget is LOWER than the Fiscal 2008 appropriations act
–Governor Corzine is committed to limiting future expenditures to recurring revenues
Debt Reduction
–Fiscal 2009 proposed budget includes the use of $650 million of non-recurring fiscal 2008 revenues for debt defeasance, producing $130mm of recurring expenditure savings. A modest first step toward reducing the State‟s debt burden
–The Governor supports a proposed constitutional amendment to limit newly authorized borrowing only to voter approved debt
17
Transportation Investment Funding Options
Governor Corzine proposed the Public Benefit Corporation, which could have
provided over $15 billion of funding for toll road and statewide transportation
capital investment immediately, and subsequently provided billions more over time.
Alternative proposals include:
– Gas tax increase and future indexing
– Tolling of un-tolled interstates
– Increased tolls on current roads, but at lower rates than in PBC proposal and
subsequent indexing
– Sale or lease of the New Jersey Lottery
ANY OF THESE OPTIONS COULD BE PART OF A STRATEGY FOR
TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT IN NEW JERSEY
THE LEGISLATURE AND THE ADMINISTRATION WILL HAVE TO WORK
TOGETHER TO FIND A SOLUTION THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ALL
18
FAILURE TO FIND A RECURRING FUNDING SOURCE FOR THE
STATE’S ESSENTIALTRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUTURE IS
UNACCEPTABLE
OUR FUTURE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND FISCAL INTEGRITY
DEPEND UPON IT
19
APPENDIX
20
New Jersey Roads