State of New Hampshire 10110010- ---Year Transportation ......RPC Plan Submitted (May 1 of Odd Years) Each RPC submits its regional priorities and recommendations to NHDOT Draft Statewide

State of New HampshireState of New HampshireState of New HampshireState of New Hampshire

▬

10101010----Year Transportation Plan Year Transportation Plan Year Transportation Plan Year Transportation Plan

▬

2013201320132013----2022202220222022

▬

Project Information for Project Information for Project Information for Project Information for

Transportation Advisory Transportation Advisory Transportation Advisory Transportation Advisory

Committee RankingCommittee RankingCommittee RankingCommittee Ranking

Southwest New HampshireSouthwest New HampshireSouthwest New HampshireSouthwest New Hampshire

1111

The Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year CycleThe Two Year Cycle

New Projects are IntroducedNew Projects are IntroducedNew Projects are IntroducedNew Projects are Introduced(Fall of Even Years 2006, 2008, etc.)(Fall of Even Years 2006, 2008, etc.)(Fall of Even Years 2006, 2008, etc.)(Fall of Even Years 2006, 2008, etc.)Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs) Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs) Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs) Regional Planning Commissions (RPCs) request proposals from constituent request proposals from constituent request proposals from constituent request proposals from constituent communities for candidate projects.communities for candidate projects.communities for candidate projects.communities for candidate projects.

Projects are Ranked RegionallyProjects are Ranked RegionallyProjects are Ranked RegionallyProjects are Ranked Regionally(Now, usually Winter of Even Years)(Now, usually Winter of Even Years)(Now, usually Winter of Even Years)(Now, usually Winter of Even Years)The Transportation Advisory Committee The Transportation Advisory Committee The Transportation Advisory Committee The Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects

Ten Year Plan Ten Year Plan Ten Year Plan Ten Year Plan Drafted/DebatedDrafted/DebatedDrafted/DebatedDrafted/Debated(Jan.(Jan.(Jan.(Jan.----Apr. of Odd Apr. of Odd Apr. of Odd Apr. of Odd Years)Years)Years)Years)Early in the new Early in the new Early in the new Early in the new year each RPCs year each RPCs year each RPCs year each RPCs TAC develops and TAC develops and TAC develops and TAC develops and approves a draft of approves a draft of approves a draft of approves a draft of the regional the regional the regional the regional priorities and priorities and priorities and priorities and recommendations recommendations recommendations recommendations for consideration for consideration for consideration for consideration ––––keeping in mind keeping in mind keeping in mind keeping in mind

RPC Plan SubmittedRPC Plan SubmittedRPC Plan SubmittedRPC Plan Submitted(May 1 of Odd Years)(May 1 of Odd Years)(May 1 of Odd Years)(May 1 of Odd Years)Each RPC submits its Each RPC submits its Each RPC submits its Each RPC submits its regional priorities and regional priorities and regional priorities and regional priorities and recommendations to recommendations to recommendations to recommendations to NHDOTNHDOTNHDOTNHDOT

Draft Statewide Ten Year Draft Statewide Ten Year Draft Statewide Ten Year Draft Statewide Ten Year Plan PreparedPlan PreparedPlan PreparedPlan Prepared(May(May(May(May----Dec of Odd Years)Dec of Odd Years)Dec of Odd Years)Dec of Odd Years)MayMayMayMay----July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten

2222

(TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects (TAC) for each RPC rank projects submitted for consideration based on submitted for consideration based on submitted for consideration based on submitted for consideration based on selection criteria established by each selection criteria established by each selection criteria established by each selection criteria established by each RPC RPC RPC RPC

keeping in mind keeping in mind keeping in mind keeping in mind selection criteria selection criteria selection criteria selection criteria and each projects and each projects and each projects and each projects relative scores relative scores relative scores relative scores ––––for submission to for submission to for submission to for submission to the NH DOTthe NH DOTthe NH DOTthe NH DOT

MayMayMayMay----July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares July: NHDOT prepares the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten the draft Statewide Ten Year Plan, using Year Plan, using Year Plan, using Year Plan, using information provided by information provided by information provided by information provided by each RPC for submission each RPC for submission each RPC for submission each RPC for submission to the Governor’s Advisory to the Governor’s Advisory to the Governor’s Advisory to the Governor’s Advisory Commission on Intermodal Commission on Intermodal Commission on Intermodal Commission on Intermodal Transportation (GACIT).Transportation (GACIT).Transportation (GACIT).Transportation (GACIT).

JulyJulyJulyJuly----Dec.: GACIT amends Dec.: GACIT amends Dec.: GACIT amends Dec.: GACIT amends the Ten Year Plan after a the Ten Year Plan after a the Ten Year Plan after a the Ten Year Plan after a series of statewide public series of statewide public series of statewide public series of statewide public hearings and submits it to hearings and submits it to hearings and submits it to hearings and submits it to the Governor.the Governor.the Governor.the Governor.

Adoption of Statewide PlanAdoption of Statewide PlanAdoption of Statewide PlanAdoption of Statewide Plan(Dec.(Dec.(Dec.(Dec.----June of Even Years)June of Even Years)June of Even Years)June of Even Years)The Governor reviews the Statewide Ten Year Plan The Governor reviews the Statewide Ten Year Plan The Governor reviews the Statewide Ten Year Plan The Governor reviews the Statewide Ten Year Plan and submits it to the Legislature for consideration and submits it to the Legislature for consideration and submits it to the Legislature for consideration and submits it to the Legislature for consideration and approval. Public Hearings are held and input and approval. Public Hearings are held and input and approval. Public Hearings are held and input and approval. Public Hearings are held and input considered.considered.considered.considered.

ImplementationImplementationImplementationImplementation(Dec.(Dec.(Dec.(Dec.----June of Even Years)June of Even Years)June of Even Years)June of Even Years)After adoption by the Legislature, Metropolitan Planning Organizations After adoption by the Legislature, Metropolitan Planning Organizations After adoption by the Legislature, Metropolitan Planning Organizations After adoption by the Legislature, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) incorporate approved projects into the Transportation (MPOs) incorporate approved projects into the Transportation (MPOs) incorporate approved projects into the Transportation (MPOs) incorporate approved projects into the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)Improvement Program (TIP)Improvement Program (TIP)Improvement Program (TIP)

Cycle Begins AgainCycle Begins AgainCycle Begins AgainCycle Begins Again

Regional SummaryRegional SummaryRegional SummaryRegional Summary

TAC will consider projects under TAC will consider projects under TAC will consider projects under TAC will consider projects under ffffollowing ollowing ollowing ollowing pppprogram rogram rogram rogram

areas:areas:areas:areas:

Federal Bridge Program, High Priority Projects (if Federal Bridge Program, High Priority Projects (if Federal Bridge Program, High Priority Projects (if Federal Bridge Program, High Priority Projects (if

Earmarks not fully funding project), National Highway Earmarks not fully funding project), National Highway Earmarks not fully funding project), National Highway Earmarks not fully funding project), National Highway

System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP –––– Areas less than Areas less than Areas less than Areas less than System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP System, Rural Access Projects, STP –––– Areas less than Areas less than Areas less than Areas less than

200K, STP 200K, STP 200K, STP 200K, STP –––– Hazard Elimination, STP Hazard Elimination, STP Hazard Elimination, STP Hazard Elimination, STP –––– Rural Areas Rural Areas Rural Areas Rural Areas

Projects in RankingProjects in RankingProjects in RankingProjects in Ranking

•TAC examined all projects in the Region in TAC examined all projects in the Region in TAC examined all projects in the Region in TAC examined all projects in the Region in 11111111----20 20 20 20 TYPTYPTYPTYP

•TAC TAC TAC TAC examined examined examined examined new project nominations for emergency new project nominations for emergency new project nominations for emergency new project nominations for emergency

and outand outand outand out----year projects.year projects.year projects.year projects.

•Town of Swanzey submitted three nominationsTown of Swanzey submitted three nominationsTown of Swanzey submitted three nominationsTown of Swanzey submitted three nominations

4444

Project Ranking CriteriaProject Ranking CriteriaProject Ranking CriteriaProject Ranking Criteria

TAC uses the most upTAC uses the most upTAC uses the most upTAC uses the most up----totototo----date Southwest Region date Southwest Region date Southwest Region date Southwest Region

Transportation Plan as guidance for project ranking. Transportation Plan as guidance for project ranking. Transportation Plan as guidance for project ranking. Transportation Plan as guidance for project ranking.

The Plan focuses on the following six areas:The Plan focuses on the following six areas:The Plan focuses on the following six areas:The Plan focuses on the following six areas:

•Regional ConnectivityRegional ConnectivityRegional ConnectivityRegional Connectivity

•Management of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing Infrastructure•Management of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing InfrastructureManagement of Existing Infrastructure

•Accessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility Alternatives

•Roadway ImprovementsRoadway ImprovementsRoadway ImprovementsRoadway Improvements

•Safety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard Mitigation

•Public Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/Approval

5555


Criterion #1: Criterion #1: Criterion #1: Criterion #1: Regional ConnectivityRegional ConnectivityRegional ConnectivityRegional Connectivity

This scoring criterion applies to highway and bridge system This scoring criterion applies to highway and bridge system This scoring criterion applies to highway and bridge system This scoring criterion applies to highway and bridge system

that provides that provides that provides that provides strategic regional connectionsstrategic regional connectionsstrategic regional connectionsstrategic regional connections....

•Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or

not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)

•Highest priority given to highway and bridges that Highest priority given to highway and bridges that Highest priority given to highway and bridges that Highest priority given to highway and bridges that

connect to the greater New England economy. connect to the greater New England economy. connect to the greater New England economy. connect to the greater New England economy. Roads Roads Roads Roads

noted noted noted noted in the Plan include 9, 10, 12, 101, 119 in the Plan include 9, 10, 12, 101, 119 in the Plan include 9, 10, 12, 101, 119 in the Plan include 9, 10, 12, 101, 119 & & & &

202202202202....

•Next level of priority given to Next level of priority given to Next level of priority given to Next level of priority given to highways and bridges of interhighways and bridges of interhighways and bridges of interhighways and bridges of inter----

regional significanceregional significanceregional significanceregional significance. . . .

6666


Criterion #2: Criterion #2: Criterion #2: Criterion #2: Management of Existing Management of Existing Management of Existing Management of Existing

Infrastructure/CapacityInfrastructure/CapacityInfrastructure/CapacityInfrastructure/Capacity

This scoring criterion applies to projects that This scoring criterion applies to projects that This scoring criterion applies to projects that This scoring criterion applies to projects that preserve and/or preserve and/or preserve and/or preserve and/or

maximize existing infrastructure and/or capacitymaximize existing infrastructure and/or capacitymaximize existing infrastructure and/or capacitymaximize existing infrastructure and/or capacity of the of the of the of the

highway/bridge system. highway/bridge system. highway/bridge system. highway/bridge system.

•Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or

not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)not applicable (0)

•Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely

aligned with preserving and/or maximizing existing aligned with preserving and/or maximizing existing aligned with preserving and/or maximizing existing aligned with preserving and/or maximizing existing

infrastructure and/or capacity.infrastructure and/or capacity.infrastructure and/or capacity.infrastructure and/or capacity.

•Next level of priority given to projects that will have some Next level of priority given to projects that will have some Next level of priority given to projects that will have some Next level of priority given to projects that will have some

incidental or small benefit in preserving or incidental or small benefit in preserving or incidental or small benefit in preserving or incidental or small benefit in preserving or

maximizing infrastructure and/or capacity.maximizing infrastructure and/or capacity.maximizing infrastructure and/or capacity.maximizing infrastructure and/or capacity.

7777


Criterion #3: Criterion #3: Criterion #3: Criterion #3: Accessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility AlternativesAccessibility and Mobility Alternatives

This scoring criterion describes the need to set the This scoring criterion describes the need to set the This scoring criterion describes the need to set the This scoring criterion describes the need to set the

framework for expansion of services or infrastructure to framework for expansion of services or infrastructure to framework for expansion of services or infrastructure to framework for expansion of services or infrastructure to

serve the serve the serve the serve the mobility and accessibility of those without personal mobility and accessibility of those without personal mobility and accessibility of those without personal mobility and accessibility of those without personal

transportationtransportationtransportationtransportation....

•Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or •Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or Score on scale from high priority (10) to low priority (1), or


•Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely Highest priority given when project purpose is closely

aligned with expanding accessibility and mobility aligned with expanding accessibility and mobility aligned with expanding accessibility and mobility aligned with expanding accessibility and mobility

for populations without personal transportation.for populations without personal transportation.for populations without personal transportation.for populations without personal transportation.

•Next level of priority given to projects where there is a Next level of priority given to projects where there is a Next level of priority given to projects where there is a Next level of priority given to projects where there is a

smaller upgrade for accessibility or a place where smaller upgrade for accessibility or a place where smaller upgrade for accessibility or a place where smaller upgrade for accessibility or a place where

there is known significant ped/bike or transit traffic.there is known significant ped/bike or transit traffic.there is known significant ped/bike or transit traffic.there is known significant ped/bike or transit traffic.

8888


Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Roadway ImprovementsRoadway ImprovementsRoadway ImprovementsRoadway Improvements

This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address

deficiencies in the highway and bridge network by applying deficiencies in the highway and bridge network by applying deficiencies in the highway and bridge network by applying deficiencies in the highway and bridge network by applying

strategic improvementsstrategic improvementsstrategic improvementsstrategic improvements....



•Highest priority given when project is a strategic Highest priority given when project is a strategic Highest priority given when project is a strategic Highest priority given when project is a strategic

improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments

and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. Please Please Please Please

note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and

intersections on next two slides for highest priority.intersections on next two slides for highest priority.intersections on next two slides for highest priority.intersections on next two slides for highest priority.


smaller improvement.smaller improvement.smaller improvement.smaller improvement.

9999


Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)

Roadway segment improvements listed in the Plan include:Roadway segment improvements listed in the Plan include:Roadway segment improvements listed in the Plan include:Roadway segment improvements listed in the Plan include:

•US 202 US 202 US 202 US 202 –––– Peterborough, from NH 136 to Grove Street Peterborough, from NH 136 to Grove Street Peterborough, from NH 136 to Grove Street Peterborough, from NH 136 to Grove Street

ExtensionExtensionExtensionExtension

•NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 –––– Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123•NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 –––– Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123Peterborough, from Grove Street to NH 123

•NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 NH 101 –––– Keene, from NH 9 to Marlborough TLKeene, from NH 9 to Marlborough TLKeene, from NH 9 to Marlborough TLKeene, from NH 9 to Marlborough TL

•NH 10 NH 10 NH 10 NH 10 –––– Keene, from West Street to Swanzey TL (Including Keene, from West Street to Swanzey TL (Including Keene, from West Street to Swanzey TL (Including Keene, from West Street to Swanzey TL (Including

NH 101)NH 101)NH 101)NH 101)

•NH 12 NH 12 NH 12 NH 12 –––– Keene, from NH 101 to Swanzey TLKeene, from NH 101 to Swanzey TLKeene, from NH 101 to Swanzey TLKeene, from NH 101 to Swanzey TL

10101010


Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Criterion #4: Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)Roadway Improvements (continued)

Intersection improvements listed in the plan include:Intersection improvements listed in the plan include:Intersection improvements listed in the plan include:Intersection improvements listed in the plan include:

•NH 101 at NH 9, KeeneNH 101 at NH 9, KeeneNH 101 at NH 9, KeeneNH 101 at NH 9, Keene



•NH 101 at Swanzey Factory Road, KeeneNH 101 at Swanzey Factory Road, KeeneNH 101 at Swanzey Factory Road, KeeneNH 101 at Swanzey Factory Road, Keene

•NH 124 at NH 101, MarlboroughNH 124 at NH 101, MarlboroughNH 124 at NH 101, MarlboroughNH 124 at NH 101, Marlborough

•US 202 at NH 124, Jaffrey (dogleg)US 202 at NH 124, Jaffrey (dogleg)US 202 at NH 124, Jaffrey (dogleg)US 202 at NH 124, Jaffrey (dogleg)

•US 202 at NH 101, Peterborough (dogleg)US 202 at NH 101, Peterborough (dogleg)US 202 at NH 101, Peterborough (dogleg)US 202 at NH 101, Peterborough (dogleg)

•US 202 at Main Street, PeterboroughUS 202 at Main Street, PeterboroughUS 202 at Main Street, PeterboroughUS 202 at Main Street, Peterborough

11111111


Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Safety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard MitigationSafety, Security and Hazard Mitigation

This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address This scoring criterion describes projects that address safety safety safety safety

issuesissuesissuesissues in the highway and bridge network. Considerations in the highway and bridge network. Considerations in the highway and bridge network. Considerations in the highway and bridge network. Considerations

should include projects that address hazard mitigation or are should include projects that address hazard mitigation or are should include projects that address hazard mitigation or are should include projects that address hazard mitigation or are

part of evacuation route near Vermont Yankee.part of evacuation route near Vermont Yankee.part of evacuation route near Vermont Yankee.part of evacuation route near Vermont Yankee.



•Highest priority given when project purpose is a safety Highest priority given when project purpose is a safety Highest priority given when project purpose is a safety Highest priority given when project purpose is a safety

improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments improvement addressing bridges, road segments

and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. and/or intersections that require attention. Please Please Please Please

note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and note Plan identified strategic road segments and

intersections on next slide for highest priority.intersections on next slide for highest priority.intersections on next slide for highest priority.intersections on next slide for highest priority.


smaller safety improvement.smaller safety improvement.smaller safety improvement.smaller safety improvement.12121212


Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Criterion #5: Safety, Security and Hazard Mitigation Safety, Security and Hazard Mitigation Safety, Security and Hazard Mitigation Safety, Security and Hazard Mitigation

(continued)(continued)(continued)(continued)

Areas in need of safety upgrades listed in the Plan include:Areas in need of safety upgrades listed in the Plan include:Areas in need of safety upgrades listed in the Plan include:Areas in need of safety upgrades listed in the Plan include:

•NH 101/NH 123 intersection in PeterboroughNH 101/NH 123 intersection in PeterboroughNH 101/NH 123 intersection in PeterboroughNH 101/NH 123 intersection in Peterborough

•NH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in Fitzwilliam•NH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in FitzwilliamNH 119/NH 12 intersection in Fitzwilliam

•NH 123/NH 124 intersection in New IpswichNH 123/NH 124 intersection in New IpswichNH 123/NH 124 intersection in New IpswichNH 123/NH 124 intersection in New Ipswich

•NH 12/Swanzey Factory Road intersection in KeeneNH 12/Swanzey Factory Road intersection in KeeneNH 12/Swanzey Factory Road intersection in KeeneNH 12/Swanzey Factory Road intersection in Keene

•NH 119 from US 202 in Rindge to WinchesterNH 119 from US 202 in Rindge to WinchesterNH 119 from US 202 in Rindge to WinchesterNH 119 from US 202 in Rindge to Winchester

13131313


Criterion #6: Criterion #6: Criterion #6: Criterion #6: Public Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/ApprovalPublic Participation/Approval

All projects to be reviewed are considered publicly approved All projects to be reviewed are considered publicly approved All projects to be reviewed are considered publicly approved All projects to be reviewed are considered publicly approved

and therefore each project is given equal scores for this and therefore each project is given equal scores for this and therefore each project is given equal scores for this and therefore each project is given equal scores for this

criterion. The TAC does not score projects under this criterion. The TAC does not score projects under this criterion. The TAC does not score projects under this criterion. The TAC does not score projects under this

criterion.criterion.criterion.criterion.

14141414

PROJECTSPROJECTSPROJECTSPROJECTS

TO BE SCOREDTO BE SCOREDTO BE SCOREDTO BE SCORED

15151515

Ten Year Plan Project Cost and TYP Status by FY11-20 TAC Ranking

Project Change HighlightsSince FY11-20 TYP Ranking Process

• TAC Project Ranked #1: Bridge Project #12210 (Hinsdale-Brattleboro Bridge) significant project cost increase: from $32.15 m to 36.89 m

• TAC Project Ranked #5: Highway Project #14747 (Route 12 linking N. Walpole to Charlestown), significant project increase: from $13.54 m to $16.71 m $13.54 m to $16.71 m

• TAC Project Ranked #11: Highway and Bridge Project # 10439 (Route 9 Sullivan and Roxbury), likely project scope reduction due to limited budget

• TAC Project Ranked #12: Intersection Project #13919 (Route 119 and 12 in Fitzwilliam), Being assessed as possible Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) candidate

Project Status HighlightsSince FY11-20 TYP Ranking Process

• TAC Project Ranked #13: Highway Project w/ no Project # (Route 10/Manning Hill Road), NHDOT District IV office continues to invest betterment project funds in highway, targeted HSIP may be possible

• TAC Project Ranked #14: Highway Project #13597 (Route 63 S curve by Spofford Lake in Chesterfield), possible scope reduction (see project for more info)(see project for more info)

• TAC Project Ranked #16: Bridge Project #15881 (Route 119 Bridge over Ashuelot River in Winchester), project advancement: red list bridge was bumped up bridge project list from 2015 to 2011 because of decision to replace bridge deck rather than replace entire bridge

Project Status HighlightsSince FY11-20 TYP Ranking Process

• TAC Project Ranked #19: Intersection w/ no Project # (Route 101/123 and Old Street Rd in Peterborough), programmed for $135,000 HSIP funds, Target Ad date is September 6, 2011.

• TAC Project Ranked #22: Bridge Project # 12905 (Vilas Bridge connecting Walpole to Rockingham [Bellows Falls]), possible project advancement from 2015 to 2012advancement from 2015 to 2012

Chesterfield Chesterfield Chesterfield Chesterfield –––– Project # 13597Project # 13597Project # 13597Project # 13597

•In 09In 09In 09In 09----18 TYP and 1118 TYP and 1118 TYP and 1118 TYP and 11----20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP

•Project is currently Project is currently Project is currently Project is currently proposed as proposed as proposed as proposed as NHDOT adding NHDOT adding NHDOT adding NHDOT adding

new guardrail to S Curvenew guardrail to S Curvenew guardrail to S Curvenew guardrail to S Curve————minimal fill in lake is minimal fill in lake is minimal fill in lake is minimal fill in lake is

likely required to secure guardraillikely required to secure guardraillikely required to secure guardraillikely required to secure guardrail

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m20 TYP: $.44 m

•1/11 Cost Estimate: $.71 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $.71 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $.71 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $.71 m

•Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2012Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2012Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2012Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2012

•Project website: Project website: Project website: Project website:

http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13

597/index.htm597/index.htm597/index.htm597/index.htm

•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 1400 (2009) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 1400 (2009) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 1400 (2009) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 1400 (2009) on NH

63 at Westmoreland/Chesterfield TL63 at Westmoreland/Chesterfield TL63 at Westmoreland/Chesterfield TL63 at Westmoreland/Chesterfield TL 20202020


Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage Route 63 passage

that is on unstable that is on unstable that is on unstable that is on unstable

ground adjacent ground adjacent ground adjacent ground adjacent

to Spofford Lake to Spofford Lake to Spofford Lake to Spofford Lake

shorelineshorelineshorelineshoreline

To Route 9To Route 9To Route 9To Route 9

21212121


Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/

zooming at: zooming at: zooming at: zooming at:

http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13597/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13597/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13597/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/chesterfield13597/documents/

13597her.pdf13597her.pdf13597her.pdf13597her.pdf

Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale –––– Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro ––––

Project # 12210Project # 12210Project # 12210Project # 12210

• In 09In 09In 09In 09----18 TYP and 1118 TYP and 1118 TYP and 1118 TYP and 11----20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP

•NH 119 Replace 2 bridges over Connecticut NH 119 Replace 2 bridges over Connecticut NH 119 Replace 2 bridges over Connecticut NH 119 Replace 2 bridges over Connecticut

River by constructing a new bridge downstream, River by constructing a new bridge downstream, River by constructing a new bridge downstream, River by constructing a new bridge downstream,

bridge trajectory over former Norm’s Marina (NH) bridge trajectory over former Norm’s Marina (NH) bridge trajectory over former Norm’s Marina (NH) bridge trajectory over former Norm’s Marina (NH)

to former Blue Seal building (VT) to US 5to former Blue Seal building (VT) to US 5to former Blue Seal building (VT) to US 5to former Blue Seal building (VT) to US 5

•NHDOT waiting on VTrans environmental review, NHDOT waiting on VTrans environmental review, NHDOT waiting on VTrans environmental review, NHDOT waiting on VTrans environmental review,

public hearing planned for 2011public hearing planned for 2011public hearing planned for 2011public hearing planned for 2011

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $32.15 m20 TYP: $32.15 m20 TYP: $32.15 m20 TYP: $32.15 m

•1/11 Cost Estimate: $36.89 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $36.89 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $36.89 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $36.89 m

•Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2016Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2016Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2016Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2016

•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7100 (2007) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7100 (2007) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7100 (2007) on NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7100 (2007) on NH

119 at Brattleboro TL119 at Brattleboro TL119 at Brattleboro TL119 at Brattleboro TL 23232323

Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale –––– Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro ––––


One bridge to One bridge to One bridge to One bridge to

south of existing south of existing south of existing south of existing

bridgesbridgesbridgesbridgesbridgesbridgesbridgesbridges

24242424

Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plan

available for download available for download available for download available for download

and viewing/zooming and viewing/zooming and viewing/zooming and viewing/zooming

at:at:at:at:

http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/

Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale Hinsdale –––– Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro Brattleboro


http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/http://www.nh.gov/dot/

projects/hinsdalebrattlprojects/hinsdalebrattlprojects/hinsdalebrattlprojects/hinsdalebrattl

eboro12210/documenteboro12210/documenteboro12210/documenteboro12210/document

s/12210her.pdfs/12210her.pdfs/12210her.pdfs/12210her.pdf

Jaffrey Jaffrey Jaffrey Jaffrey -------- No Project #No Project #No Project #No Project #

•Project deferred in 07Project deferred in 07Project deferred in 07Project deferred in 07----16 & 0916 & 0916 & 0916 & 09----18 TYPS18 TYPS18 TYPS18 TYPS

•Project involves improving the Jaffrey doglegProject involves improving the Jaffrey doglegProject involves improving the Jaffrey doglegProject involves improving the Jaffrey dogleg

•Planning level cost estimate: Planning level cost estimate: Planning level cost estimate: Planning level cost estimate: $$$$6.2 m6.2 m6.2 m6.2 m

•VanasseVanasseVanasseVanasse HangenHangenHangenHangen BrustlinBrustlinBrustlinBrustlin, Inc. has provided Town , Inc. has provided Town , Inc. has provided Town , Inc. has provided Town

following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:following recommendations:

•Possible Roundabout at Blake St, Peterborough St (US 202), Possible Roundabout at Blake St, Peterborough St (US 202), Possible Roundabout at Blake St, Peterborough St (US 202), Possible Roundabout at Blake St, Peterborough St (US 202),

Stratton Rd and Turnpike Rd (NH 124)Stratton Rd and Turnpike Rd (NH 124)Stratton Rd and Turnpike Rd (NH 124)Stratton Rd and Turnpike Rd (NH 124)

•2 lanes of traffic over bridge crossing Contoocook River with 2 lanes of traffic over bridge crossing Contoocook River with 2 lanes of traffic over bridge crossing Contoocook River with 2 lanes of traffic over bridge crossing Contoocook River with

parking and sidewalksparking and sidewalksparking and sidewalksparking and sidewalks

•River Street approach to Main Street is converted to oneRiver Street approach to Main Street is converted to oneRiver Street approach to Main Street is converted to oneRiver Street approach to Main Street is converted to one----way way way way

street heading Southstreet heading Southstreet heading Southstreet heading South

•Bypass (involves bridge) south of existing bridge that Bypass (involves bridge) south of existing bridge that Bypass (involves bridge) south of existing bridge that Bypass (involves bridge) south of existing bridge that

connects to River Street (see three alternatives on next connects to River Street (see three alternatives on next connects to River Street (see three alternatives on next connects to River Street (see three alternatives on next

slide)slide)slide)slide) 26262626


27272727


28282828

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 BProject # 10309 BProject # 10309 BProject # 10309 B


•Reconstruction of Winchester Street from NH Reconstruction of Winchester Street from NH Reconstruction of Winchester Street from NH Reconstruction of Winchester Street from NH

101 Roundabout north to Pearl St/Island St 101 Roundabout north to Pearl St/Island St 101 Roundabout north to Pearl St/Island St 101 Roundabout north to Pearl St/Island St

including intersection at Key Rd including intersection at Key Rd including intersection at Key Rd including intersection at Key Rd

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP with a 20% 20 TYP with a 20% 20 TYP with a 20% 20 TYP with a 20%

municipal match = $4.573m, project is municipal match = $4.573m, project is municipal match = $4.573m, project is municipal match = $4.573m, project is

municipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managedmunicipally managed

•Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2019?Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2019?Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2019?Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2014/2019?

•Closest/Most Recent AADT: Closest/Most Recent AADT: Closest/Most Recent AADT: Closest/Most Recent AADT:

•18,500 (2008) on Winchester St No of NH 10/12/10118,500 (2008) on Winchester St No of NH 10/12/10118,500 (2008) on Winchester St No of NH 10/12/10118,500 (2008) on Winchester St No of NH 10/12/101

•17,000 (2008) on Winchester St No of Key Road17,000 (2008) on Winchester St No of Key Road17,000 (2008) on Winchester St No of Key Road17,000 (2008) on Winchester St No of Key Road

•14,000 (2008) on Winchester St at Ashuelot Bridge14,000 (2008) on Winchester St at Ashuelot Bridge14,000 (2008) on Winchester St at Ashuelot Bridge14,000 (2008) on Winchester St at Ashuelot Bridge

•4,800 (2008) Key Rd at Old Key Rd4,800 (2008) Key Rd at Old Key Rd4,800 (2008) Key Rd at Old Key Rd4,800 (2008) Key Rd at Old Key Rd

29292929

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 BProject # 10309 BProject # 10309 BProject # 10309 B

Key Road Key Road Key Road Key Road

intersectionintersectionintersectionintersection

Pearl and Pearl and Pearl and Pearl and

Island StreetsIsland StreetsIsland StreetsIsland Streets

30303030

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 LProject # 10309 LProject # 10309 LProject # 10309 L


•NH 12/101 Construction of Interim Widening NH 12/101 Construction of Interim Widening NH 12/101 Construction of Interim Widening NH 12/101 Construction of Interim Widening

with Replacement of Ashuelot River Bridgewith Replacement of Ashuelot River Bridgewith Replacement of Ashuelot River Bridgewith Replacement of Ashuelot River Bridge

•Part of original KeenePart of original KeenePart of original KeenePart of original Keene----Swanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass Projects•Part of original KeenePart of original KeenePart of original KeenePart of original Keene----Swanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass Projects

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = 5.26 m20 TYP = 5.26 m20 TYP = 5.26 m20 TYP = 5.26 m


•Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:

•NH 101 (Keene Bypass), E of NH 12 = NH 101 (Keene Bypass), E of NH 12 = NH 101 (Keene Bypass), E of NH 12 = NH 101 (Keene Bypass), E of NH 12 =

11,000 (2008)11,000 (2008)11,000 (2008)11,000 (2008)

31313131


Keene Keene Keene Keene

RoundaboutRoundaboutRoundaboutRoundabout

32323232

NH 12/101 Construction of interim NH 12/101 Construction of interim NH 12/101 Construction of interim NH 12/101 Construction of interim

widening with replacement of the widening with replacement of the widening with replacement of the widening with replacement of the

Ashuelot River Bridge.Ashuelot River Bridge.Ashuelot River Bridge.Ashuelot River Bridge.


KeeneKeeneKeeneKeene----Swanzey Swanzey Swanzey Swanzey

Bypass Interim Bypass Interim Bypass Interim Bypass Interim

ImprovementImprovementImprovementImprovement 33333333

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 JProject # 10309 JProject # 10309 JProject # 10309 J


•Interim intersection improvements at “T” Interim intersection improvements at “T” Interim intersection improvements at “T” Interim intersection improvements at “T”

intersectionintersectionintersectionintersection

•Part of KeenePart of KeenePart of KeenePart of Keene----Swanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass Projects

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m20 TYP = $2.2 m


•Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:Closest/Most Recent AADT:

•22,000 (2009) on NH 9 W of NH 1222,000 (2009) on NH 9 W of NH 1222,000 (2009) on NH 9 W of NH 1222,000 (2009) on NH 9 W of NH 12

•24,000 (2008) on NH 10/12/101 W of Winchester St24,000 (2008) on NH 10/12/101 W of Winchester St24,000 (2008) on NH 10/12/101 W of Winchester St24,000 (2008) on NH 10/12/101 W of Winchester St

•23,000 (2009) on NH 9/10/12 N of NH 10/12/10123,000 (2009) on NH 9/10/12 N of NH 10/12/10123,000 (2009) on NH 9/10/12 N of NH 10/12/10123,000 (2009) on NH 9/10/12 N of NH 10/12/101

34343434


Monadnock Monadnock Monadnock Monadnock

Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace, Marketplace,

BrattleboroBrattleboroBrattleboroBrattleboroKeene Keene Keene Keene


35353535



ImprovementImprovementImprovementImprovement NH 9/10/12/101 NH 9/10/12/101 NH 9/10/12/101 NH 9/10/12/101

Reconstruction of “SPDI” Reconstruction of “SPDI” Reconstruction of “SPDI” Reconstruction of “SPDI”

Mainline and Trumpet Mainline and Trumpet Mainline and Trumpet Mainline and Trumpet

Interchange has been Interchange has been Interchange has been Interchange has been

removed and replaced with removed and replaced with removed and replaced with removed and replaced with

the interim improvements the interim improvements the interim improvements the interim improvements

shown here.shown here.shown here.shown here.


shown here.shown here.shown here.shown here.

36363636

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 KProject # 10309 KProject # 10309 KProject # 10309 K

•Deferred in 09Deferred in 09Deferred in 09Deferred in 09----18 TYP, back in 1118 TYP, back in 1118 TYP, back in 1118 TYP, back in 11----20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP20 TYP

•NH 12/101, Interim intersection improvements NH 12/101, Interim intersection improvements NH 12/101, Interim intersection improvements NH 12/101, Interim intersection improvements

at Main Streetat Main Streetat Main Streetat Main Street

•Part of KeenePart of KeenePart of KeenePart of Keene----Swanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass ProjectsSwanzey Bypass Projects

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m20 TYP = $2.75 m


•Closest/Most Recent ADT: Closest/Most Recent ADT: Closest/Most Recent ADT: Closest/Most Recent ADT:

•14,000 (2008) Main St. N of Junction NH12/10114,000 (2008) Main St. N of Junction NH12/10114,000 (2008) Main St. N of Junction NH12/10114,000 (2008) Main St. N of Junction NH12/101

•14,000 (2008) NH 12 at Swanzey Town Line14,000 (2008) NH 12 at Swanzey Town Line14,000 (2008) NH 12 at Swanzey Town Line14,000 (2008) NH 12 at Swanzey Town Line

•11,000 (2008) NH 101 E of NH 1211,000 (2008) NH 101 E of NH 1211,000 (2008) NH 101 E of NH 1211,000 (2008) NH 101 E of NH 12

37373737




MarlboroughMarlboroughMarlboroughMarlborough

38383838

NH 12/101 interim NH 12/101 interim NH 12/101 interim NH 12/101 interim

intersection intersection intersection intersection

improvements at Main improvements at Main improvements at Main improvements at Main

Street intersection.Street intersection.Street intersection.Street intersection.




ImprovementImprovementImprovementImprovement 39393939

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 PProject # 10309 PProject # 10309 PProject # 10309 P


•Construction of a multiConstruction of a multiConstruction of a multiConstruction of a multi----use trail bridge over use trail bridge over use trail bridge over use trail bridge over

12/101 and mitigation site12/101 and mitigation site12/101 and mitigation site12/101 and mitigation site

•Part of KeenePart of KeenePart of KeenePart of Keene----Swanzey Bypass projectsSwanzey Bypass projectsSwanzey Bypass projectsSwanzey Bypass projects

•Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? •Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014? Construction Start/Completion Yr: 2013/2014?

(ad date 1/8/13)(ad date 1/8/13)(ad date 1/8/13)(ad date 1/8/13)

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP = $3.135 m20 TYP = $3.135 m20 TYP = $3.135 m20 TYP = $3.135 m

•Closest/Most Recent ADT:Closest/Most Recent ADT:Closest/Most Recent ADT:Closest/Most Recent ADT:

•22,000 (2009) on NH 12/101 Over Ashuelot River22,000 (2009) on NH 12/101 Over Ashuelot River22,000 (2009) on NH 12/101 Over Ashuelot River22,000 (2009) on NH 12/101 Over Ashuelot River

40404040

Keene Keene Keene Keene –––– Project # 10309 PProject # 10309 PProject # 10309 PProject # 10309 P

BridgeBridgeBridgeBridge

Rail Trail Rail Trail Rail Trail Rail Trail

(yellow line)(yellow line)(yellow line)(yellow line)



41414141

New Ipswich New Ipswich New Ipswich New Ipswich –––– Project # 14465Project # 14465Project # 14465Project # 14465


•NH 123/124 replace bridge over Souhegan NH 123/124 replace bridge over Souhegan NH 123/124 replace bridge over Souhegan NH 123/124 replace bridge over Souhegan

River, stabalize stone arch, improve bridge River, stabalize stone arch, improve bridge River, stabalize stone arch, improve bridge River, stabalize stone arch, improve bridge

approaches and temporary bridgeapproaches and temporary bridgeapproaches and temporary bridgeapproaches and temporary bridge

•Red List Bridge State Priority # 18Red List Bridge State Priority # 18Red List Bridge State Priority # 18Red List Bridge State Priority # 18

•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m•Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m20 TYP: $2.86 m



•Project website: Project website: Project website: Project website:

http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich144http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich144http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich144http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich144


•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 5,400 (2008) NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 5,400 (2008) NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 5,400 (2008) NH Closest/Most Recent ADT: 5,400 (2008) NH

123/NH 124 over Souhegan River123/NH 124 over Souhegan River123/NH 124 over Souhegan River123/NH 124 over Souhegan River 42424242


Existing ConditionsExisting ConditionsExisting ConditionsExisting Conditions

BEFOREBEFOREBEFOREBEFORE

AFTERAFTERAFTERAFTER


Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/ Most recent plan concept available for download and viewing/


http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich14465/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich14465/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich14465/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/newipswich14465/documents/

14465her121510.pdf14465her121510.pdf14465her121510.pdf14465her121510.pdf

Roxbury Roxbury Roxbury Roxbury –––– Sullivan Sullivan Sullivan Sullivan ––––



•NH 9 reconstruct shoulders & widen from East NH 9 reconstruct shoulders & widen from East NH 9 reconstruct shoulders & widen from East NH 9 reconstruct shoulders & widen from East

Sullivan, south 2.04 miSullivan, south 2.04 miSullivan, south 2.04 miSullivan, south 2.04 mi

•NHDOT starting to look at in 2011, entire portion NHDOT starting to look at in 2011, entire portion NHDOT starting to look at in 2011, entire portion NHDOT starting to look at in 2011, entire portion

cannot be reconstructed with existing budget, cannot be reconstructed with existing budget, cannot be reconstructed with existing budget, cannot be reconstructed with existing budget,

will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red will have to prioritize worst parts of road. Red

list bridge replacement over Otter Brook cost list bridge replacement over Otter Brook cost list bridge replacement over Otter Brook cost list bridge replacement over Otter Brook cost

estimate $2.76 m.estimate $2.76 m.estimate $2.76 m.estimate $2.76 m.




•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,100 (2008) NH 9 W

of Center St in Sullivanof Center St in Sullivanof Center St in Sullivanof Center St in Sullivan 47474747

Roxbury Roxbury Roxbury Roxbury –––– Sullivan Sullivan Sullivan Sullivan ––––


Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge

replacementreplacementreplacementreplacement

Otter BrookOtter BrookOtter BrookOtter Brook

48484848

Stoddard Stoddard Stoddard Stoddard –––– Antrim Antrim Antrim Antrim –––– Hillsborough Hillsborough Hillsborough Hillsborough ––––

No Project #No Project #No Project #No Project #


•NH 9 acquire controlled access ROW from just NH 9 acquire controlled access ROW from just NH 9 acquire controlled access ROW from just NH 9 acquire controlled access ROW from just

east of 123 to westerly end of Hillsborough east of 123 to westerly end of Hillsborough east of 123 to westerly end of Hillsborough east of 123 to westerly end of Hillsborough

BypassBypassBypassBypass


•Project ROW acquisition currently scheduled for Project ROW acquisition currently scheduled for Project ROW acquisition currently scheduled for Project ROW acquisition currently scheduled for

2015 and 20172015 and 20172015 and 20172015 and 2017

•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,100 (2008) NH 9 W Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,100 (2008) NH 9 W

of NH 123 Southof NH 123 Southof NH 123 Southof NH 123 South

49494949

Stoddard Stoddard Stoddard Stoddard –––– Antrim Antrim Antrim Antrim –––– Hillsborough Hillsborough Hillsborough Hillsborough ––––

No Project #No Project #No Project #No Project #

50505050

Swanzey– No Project #NH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing Road

• Safety Improvements to Route 32 at Sawyer’s Crossing Road

• Swanzey Master Plan Update (2003) cites need for implementing traffic calming measures including the reconfiguration of the intersection

• No cost estimate available

• Closest/Most Recent ADT: 4,100 (2007) on Route 32 at South Brook (N of site)

SwanzeySwanzeySwanzeySwanzey–––– No Project #No Project #No Project #No Project #

NH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RdNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RdNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RdNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing Rd

Looking NorthLooking NorthLooking NorthLooking North

Looking SouthLooking SouthLooking SouthLooking South

SwanzeySwanzeySwanzeySwanzey–––– No Project # No Project # No Project # No Project # ---- NH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RoadNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RoadNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing RoadNH 32 & Sawyer’s Crossing Road

Looking EastLooking EastLooking EastLooking East

Swanzey – No Project #

Route 12 and 32 Intersection

• Intersection Improvements to 45 degree angle intersection of Route 12 and Route 32 in Keene

• Former Swanzey-Keene bypass project

• No cost estimate available

• Closest/Most Recent ADT:

– 14,000 (2008) on Route 12 at Swanzey/Keene Town Line

– 4,900 (2009) on Route 32 at Swanzey/Keene Town Line



Existing Conditions


Route 12 near Cheshire Fairgrounds

• Improvements to NH 12 in the vicinity of Cheshire Fairgrounds at new road connection-Safford Drive

• Safety improvements (turning lanes and widening) particularly during large events at widening) particularly during large events at Cheshire Fairgrounds

• Cost estimate is $180,000 to $225,000

• Closest/Most Recent ADT: 13,000 (2007) NH 12 South of Rustway Road



Existing Conditions

Walpole Walpole Walpole Walpole –––– Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT ––––



• Vilas Bridge rehabilitation on Bridge Street over Vilas Bridge rehabilitation on Bridge Street over Vilas Bridge rehabilitation on Bridge Street over Vilas Bridge rehabilitation on Bridge Street over

Connecticut RiverConnecticut RiverConnecticut RiverConnecticut River

• Bridge announced closed to all traffic on March 19, 2009, Bridge announced closed to all traffic on March 19, 2009, Bridge announced closed to all traffic on March 19, 2009, Bridge announced closed to all traffic on March 19, 2009,

Bridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scopingBridge design working with consultant for scoping

• Red List Bridge Priority # 36Red List Bridge Priority # 36Red List Bridge Priority # 36Red List Bridge Priority # 36

• Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11Funding allocated in 11----20 TYP: $3.48 m20 TYP: $3.48 m20 TYP: $3.48 m20 TYP: $3.48 m

• 1/11 Cost Estimate: $3.6 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $3.6 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $3.6 m1/11 Cost Estimate: $3.6 m

• Project Manager indicates possible advancement of Project Manager indicates possible advancement of Project Manager indicates possible advancement of Project Manager indicates possible advancement of

project construction from 2015 to 2012project construction from 2015 to 2012project construction from 2015 to 2012project construction from 2015 to 2012

• Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,500 (2006) Vilas Bridge Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,500 (2006) Vilas Bridge Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,500 (2006) Vilas Bridge Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,500 (2006) Vilas Bridge

Road at VT State LineRoad at VT State LineRoad at VT State LineRoad at VT State Line

61616161

Walpole Walpole Walpole Walpole –––– Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT Bellows Falls, VT

–––– Project # 12905Project # 12905Project # 12905Project # 12905

62626262

Walpole Walpole Walpole Walpole –––– Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown -------- Project # 14747Project # 14747Project # 14747Project # 14747


•NH 12 reconstruct from Main Street in Walpole NH 12 reconstruct from Main Street in Walpole NH 12 reconstruct from Main Street in Walpole NH 12 reconstruct from Main Street in Walpole

to NH 12A in Charlestown, remove concrete to NH 12A in Charlestown, remove concrete to NH 12A in Charlestown, remove concrete to NH 12A in Charlestown, remove concrete

base, add shoulders, improve drainage and base, add shoulders, improve drainage and base, add shoulders, improve drainage and base, add shoulders, improve drainage and

move parts of railroadmove parts of railroadmove parts of railroadmove parts of railroad




•See Project Website below: See Project Website below: See Project Website below: See Project Website below:

http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/walpole14747/ihttp://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/walpole14747/ihttp://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/walpole14747/ihttp://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/walpole14747/i

ndex.htmndex.htmndex.htmndex.htm

•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,400 (2007) NH 12 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,400 (2007) NH 12 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,400 (2007) NH 12 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 7,400 (2007) NH 12

N of Arch BridgeN of Arch BridgeN of Arch BridgeN of Arch Bridge63636363

Walpole Walpole Walpole Walpole –––– Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown ––––


Route 12 squeezed Route 12 squeezed Route 12 squeezed Route 12 squeezed

between Connecticut between Connecticut between Connecticut between Connecticut

River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road River and RR, Road

unstable in points by unstable in points by unstable in points by unstable in points by

Connecticut RiverConnecticut RiverConnecticut RiverConnecticut River

64646464

Walpole Walpole Walpole Walpole –––– Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown Charlestown –––– Project # 14747Project # 14747Project # 14747Project # 14747


Winchester Winchester Winchester Winchester –––– Project # 12906Project # 12906Project # 12906Project # 12906


•NH 10 Bridge replacement over Ashuelot River, NH 10 Bridge replacement over Ashuelot River, NH 10 Bridge replacement over Ashuelot River, NH 10 Bridge replacement over Ashuelot River,

improvements to sight distance and shoulders improvements to sight distance and shoulders improvements to sight distance and shoulders improvements to sight distance and shoulders

on approaches, car top boat launchon approaches, car top boat launchon approaches, car top boat launchon approaches, car top boat launch

•Red List Bridge Priority # 24Red List Bridge Priority # 24Red List Bridge Priority # 24Red List Bridge Priority # 24




•Current CSS Project (see website): Current CSS Project (see website): Current CSS Project (see website): Current CSS Project (see website):

http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester129http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester129http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester129http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester129


•Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,800 (2007) NH 10 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,800 (2007) NH 10 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,800 (2007) NH 10 Closest/Most Recent ADT: 6,800 (2007) NH 10

at Swanzey Town Lineat Swanzey Town Lineat Swanzey Town Lineat Swanzey Town Line 69696969


Preferred Alternative Plan available for download and viewing/ Preferred Alternative Plan available for download and viewing/ Preferred Alternative Plan available for download and viewing/ Preferred Alternative Plan available for download and viewing/


http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester12906/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester12906/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester12906/documents/http://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/winchester12906/documents/

12906her_new.pdf12906her_new.pdf12906her_new.pdf12906her_new.pdf

Documents

State of New Hampshire 10110010- ---Year Transportation ......RPC Plan Submitted (May 1 of Odd Years) Each RPC submits its regional priorities and recommendations to NHDOT Draft Statewide