31
Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs 2.Soviet foreign policy in the 1930s 3.The Nazi-Soviet Pact 1939-41 4.The Great Patriotic War 1941- 5

Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

Stalin’s Foreign Policy1929-45

We will study his impact on the international scene in the following

ways:1. Stalin’s approach to international

affairs2. Soviet foreign policy in the 1930s3. The Nazi-Soviet Pact 1939-414. The Great Patriotic War 1941-5

Page 2: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

I. Stalin’s Approach to International AffairsA. Fear of Western encroachment was a long-standing feature of Russian foreign policy.

1. Traditional anxiety intensified by foreign interventions in USSR in the early 1920s

a. Interventions overcome, Russia internationally isolatedB. Lenin became determined nation must secure OWN defense.

1. Lenin’s plan was not to provoke capitalist nations but to play on their differences.

a. exploit differences to prevent anti-Communist alliance be built up.

b. That compromise rather than confrontation guiding principal for Stalin’s foreign policy

Page 3: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 4: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

B. Stalin continues Lenin’s policy by adopting defensive attitude towards the outside world.

1. There is an important distinction to be made between the theory & practice of Soviet foreign policy under Stalin

a. Judge by its propagandab. In practice, the Bolsheviks didn’t regard

Soviet Russia as being strong enough to sustain a genuinely revolutionary foreign policy.

i. this meant that whatever its aggressive poses & claims may have been, the primary purpose of the Comintern was to safeguard the existence of Soviet Russia.

ii. Under Stalin, Comitern’s role was limited to protecting the USSR

Page 5: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

2. Foreign Communist parties that wished to affiliate to the Comintern had to swear absolute obedience to the line dictated by the Soviet Union.

a. The Comitern became a branch of Soviet foreign office.

Page 6: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

Summary diagram: Stalin’s approach to international affairs

Lenin’s legacy• Realism in foreign affairs• Soviet Union surrounded by

hostile states• Soviet Union not strong enough

to lead international revolution• Therefore, defensive approach

based on exploiting “contradictions in the capitalist world”

Stalin• Accepted Lenin’s defensive

policies• “Socialism in one country”• Meant subordination of foreign

affairs to domestic issues• Cominterm’s essential role to

defend interests of Soviet Union

Page 7: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 8: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

II. Soviet Foreign Policy in the 1930sSpecifically: 1929-33

A. Most governments in W. Europe regarded USSR w/ suspicion.

1. Many on the political left wanted to believe the best of Stalin’s Russia

a. Believed Russia’s poor image was a deliberate distortion by the capitalist controlled Western press

B. Stalin’s victory over the Right coincided w/ his adopting a tougher approach towards other countries.

1. Communist parties in other countries were not allowed to form alliances w/ non-Marxist parties of whom Moscow disapproved of.

a. “Social-Fascists” denounced.b. Real fascism (Nazi Germany) largely ignored

Page 9: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

C. Stalin’s massive collectivization & industrialization program coincided w/ the onset of the Great Depression in N. America & Europe.

1. Contrast between Soviet success in economic planning & the Capitalist crisis in the West could be evidence of USSR superiority w/ their system?

a. reduced need to cultivate links w/ non-communist parties. Could continue

its policy of direct contact w/ capitalist governments, playing upon their weaknesses & exploiting the contradictions between them.

D. Long term, USSR to pay dearly for Stalin’s failure to grasp what was happening in Germany.

1. Stalin mislead by their title. Accordingly, it made sense for the KPD (German Communist Party) to

co-operate w/ the Nazis.

Page 10: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 11: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

2. Stalin’s miss-read prevented him from seeing the need to organize an alliance of the German centre & Left against Nazism.

a. KPD’s obedience to Kremlin’s command not to ally w/ Social Dem’s destroyed the one real chance of

creating political barrier to Nazi power in Germany.E. Soviet Foreign Policy 1933-9 (What was Stalin’s Foreign policy in these years intended to achieve?)

1. After Hitler came to power in 1933, Stalin still slow to read the signs.2. Tried to maintain 11 yr old alliance (Treaty of Rapallo April 1922)3. Took certain events to convince Stalin Germany was a

menace:a. violent Nazi attacks on the KPD b. open discussion by German diplomats about

expansion into Russia.c. Signing in 1934 of a German-Polish treaty

4. The USSR’s greatest fear-isolation-returned

Page 12: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

F. Next 6 yrs Soviet policy was find allies to nullify German danger. (Stalin had no choice)

1. After 33’ pro-German policy no longer possible. Germany now #1 threat

a. League of Nations: provided platform for Russia to not be isolated.

i. Max Litvinov (New Foreign Commissar) called for Collective

security.ii. Fruits of this: an agreement

between USSR, France, & Czechoslovakia promising “mutual assistance”

iii. 1935 also 1st year diplomatic contact was made between US & USSR

Page 13: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 14: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

G. Turnabout: 1. Comitern reverses policy of non-alignment w/ the Left, 1935.a. Now appeal for “popular front” in Europe. True Turnabout of policy too late.2. new Constitution (1936) introduced; basically propaganda aimed @ convincing outside world USSR Free & Democratic society.a. Gains in Foreign policy superficial.i. France & Britain not prepared to risk war to uphold principal. 3. USSR claims France & Britain lost their resolve to act as upholders of European security:a. Mussolini invaded Abyssinia. France & Britain seek was to stop it from becoming international crisis. b. Hitler ignores Versailles Treaty, sent forces to re-occupy Rhineland. Britain & France offer formal protests & that’s it4. 1936, very black year for USSR’s hopes for shelter under collective securitya. In addition to German aggression & Anglo-French weakness, year saw creation of international alliance, Anti- Comintern Pactb. Led Stalin to double efforts to obtain reliable alliesi. problem was USSR not trusted

Page 15: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

H. The Spanish Civil War1. Stalin’s pursuit of alliances w/ capitalist counties alienated Soviet sympathizers. 2. Fight between the republican Left & the Fascist Right.a. Stalin keeps w/ his anti-fascist “popular front” policy & sends agents into Spain to organize a pro republican alliance.i. Motives & policies were mixed. Putting focus on Spain could deflect from purgesii. Sending military equipment to Spain, in return, most of gold reserves sent to USSRiii. “Popular Fronts” also required all republican allies to put themselves under Moscow’s control. 3. Spanish Left resented Stalin’s attempt at domination & questioned if Stalin wanted a victory.a. Stalin was not happy to see a major victory for Marxism in Spain. i. Stalin feared that if Communism was installed in south-western Europe, it would frighten France & Britain, that they would react by forming anti-soviet fronts w/ Germany & Italy.

Page 16: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 17: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

I. The Munich Settlement1. Hitler demands Sudetenland become part of

Germany. Threatens invasion.a. Another Versailles Treaty violation but France & Britain don’t act. b. They grant Hitler all his demands in the

Munich Settlement. c. Earlier in 1938, Hitler got the Auschluss,

another Versailles Treaty violation.i. Munich becomes further example

of Hitler’s ability to get his way.2. Stalin saw Munich as a gathering of the anti-

Soviet nations of Europe, intent on giving Germany a free hand to attack a diplomatically isolated USSR

Page 18: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

III. The Nazi-Soviet Pact 1939-411. August 1939, Hitler/Stalin reach formal agreement

A. Both pledged peace w/ each other for 10 yearsB. “Secret Additional Protocol” agreed that USSR

would take over Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania.

a. Poland would be divided later. Four weeks later Germany began to occupy

Poland. They then divided it. C. Stalin acted of the idea of, if you can’t beat

them, join them. This is what Stalin saw as his only move that international circumstances still allowed.

Page 19: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 20: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

2. Results of the PactA. USSR grabs eastern half of PolandB. Germany free to conduct its war w/ France & Britain in the WestC. In the East, USSR forcibly took hold of the Baltic States, Southern Finland, & Bessarabia-Bukovina

a. USSR had now gained all its territory lost after WWI

3. Stalin claimed Nazi-Soviet pact had safeguarded USSR from western attack. Stalin hailed as hero. He began to believe his own propaganda.

A. Hitler’s ultimate aim was invasion and occupation of Russia.

Page 21: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

The Nazi-Soviet Pact

Terms• 10 year non-aggression

agreement• Secret clauses over Baltic

States and Poland

Results• Hailed as diplomatic

triumph for Stalin• Lulled him into false sense

of security• Gave Germany free rein in

Western Europe• Left Soviet exposed to

German attack in June 1941

Page 22: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

IV. The Great Patriotic War 1941-451. Operation Barbarossa 1941: Hitler’s plan to attack Russia in June 1941

A. Invasion was so HUGE it could not be hidden.a. 1 week before the attack, Kremlin received word

from an Comitern agent in Japan attack about to happen on Western Russia.

b. Stalin, “this is German disinformation”c. Day before the attack Stalin gets another

confirmation (from source in Luftwaffe) on eminent attack. Gets angry & dismisses it again.

B. Why Stalin refused to see the truth defies explanationa. On the 1st few days of the invasion; Stalin

refused to talk to anyone or give instructions. 1. 1st week of WWII the eastern front,

German forces overran a Soviet Union who was w/out leadership or direction

Page 23: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

2. Failure of Barbarossa explained w/ 3 factors:A. Stalin pulled himself together & began to show the leadership he

became renowned for the rest of the war.B. The lateness of the launching of Barbarossa, meant by autumn of 1941

Moscow nor Leningrad (they were besieged) had not fallen.C. Fate intervened on USSR’s behalf. It was 1 of the most severe winters

in Russia memory. Slowed Germany to a crawl. Russia’s troops able to regroup & counterattack. 3. Striking aspect of Barbarossa:

A. Along front many in Soviet population welcomed the invaders @ 1st

B. Some even willing to join the German armya. Germany failed to see the benefit of thisb. instead they treated the area w/ savagery. Causing the

Bolsheviks & the Russian nationalists into a common front against Germany.

c. Germany was so brutal of their treatment of the Russians that the Russian people commit themselves to a struggle for survival. This earned it the name The Great Patriotic War.*Note: In pushing into eastern Germany in the closing stages of the war, the Red Army subjected the civilian population to the same ferocity that the Soviet people had suffered.

Page 24: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 25: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

4. The Character of the War (why was the war on the eastern front so bitter and destructive?)

A. War of attrition: Russia able to overstretch German army making them vulnerable

B. Two battles in particular illustrated the character of the Soviet resistance & explained Germany’s defeat:

a. Battle of Stalingrad 1942-3. Germany besieged Stalingrad when moving south-eastward to seize oil fields.

b. In response to Stalin, Hitler orders all males in the city killed.1. The German army is overrun in Stalingrad. Hitler’s

generals beg for a retreat. 2. German forces battered (deprived of supplies) &

starved into submission3. They surrender on 31 Jan. 1943. This was a bitter

blow to which they NEVER recovered.b. Soviet forces themselves suffered terribly. In the battle that

occupied the winter months of 1942-3 over a million Soviet troops killed.

a. Stalingrad proved Hitler’s armies were not invincible. Gave promise of final victory to the Western allies.

Page 26: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

5. The Battle of Kursk July 1943A. Hitler tries to gain back prestige of his army. Backs a plan from his Generals to attack Kursk.B. Operation Citadel began on 5 July 1943. Largest tank battle in history. Russia pores troops into Kursk very quickly.C. After 12 days of attack & counterattack Germans still not broke through. Mindful of Stalingrad, Hitler decides to call off entire operation. D. From this point forward Russia went on the offensive. Attacking and driving Germany back and eventually invading Germany. Germany surrendered in the spring of 1945.

Page 27: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

6. The impact of the war on the USSRA. everything in Russia subordinated to the sheer necessity of survival. B. Stalin’s 13 yrs of putting Russia’s economy on a war footing began to show benefits.

1. Centralized authority very helpful when it come to organizing for a war.2. Hardships the people had labored under for last 13 yrs prepared them for hardships of life during war

a. The Soviet people suffered very much during the war.

Page 28: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs
Page 29: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

7. Wartime reorganizationA. Reason for early catastrophe was under FYPs Soviet industrial expansion had been west of Urals

1. Extraordinary efforts made to transfer whole sectors of industry to safer eastern USSR

2. All adults not involved with “essential” war work were drafted

a. 4 million died first yr of war. This forced woman & children to have to work in factories3. By 1942 over ½ of national income went to military

expendituresa. pre war production levels could not be kept

under these circumstances4. 1942 lowest economic yr for USSR. After 42’production goes

up, so does economy.a. Lend-lease program bolstered the Soviet’s home

produced supply of weapons & motor transport. b. railway system rebuilt

Page 30: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

8. The suffering of the Soviet people:A. 5 mil. of the 25 mil. That died during the war were a result of starvation.

9. The end of the war:A. Stalin gave orders that his role in the victory be given highest place.B. Paintings of him as a great military leader were put on all buildings

Page 31: Stalin’s Foreign Policy 1929-45 We will study his impact on the international scene in the following ways: 1.Stalin’s approach to international affairs

The Great Patriotic War 1941-45Operation Barbarossa

•Stalin caught out•No leadership given•German attack almost succeeds•USSR saved by timing of attack & weather conditions•Germany loses chance to exploit anti-Stalinism of Soviet peoples

The Character of the War•Savage war of attrition•Stalingrad•Kursk•Fall of Berlin

The impact of the war on the USSR•War & German occupation require reorganization of Soviet economy•Acute suffering for the Soviet people throughout the war•The deportation of nationalities•Prodigious Soviet efforts * Stalin still more entrenched after •Huge losses successful end of the war•Lend-lease