Upload
syedkashifali
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
1/7
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
28(4) 168172
The Author(s) 2012
Reprints and permission: http://www.
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/8756479312442110
http://jdms.sagepub.com
Case Studies
Abscess of the spleen is not a routinely seen finding. A
review of the literature shows that only 500 to 600 cases
have ever been reported internationally.1The pathogen-
esis of splenic infections responsible for splenic abscess
is typically defined by five categories: (1) metastatic
hematogenous infection, including intravenous (IV)
drug use; (2) hemoglobinopathy; (3) immune systemsuppression secondary to chemotherapy or human
immunodeficiency virus; (4) trauma; and (5) contiguous
site of infection.25The most frequent agent of splenic
abscess is an infection with gram-positive cocci domi-
nated by Enterobacteriaceae. When gram-negative
bacilli are the causative agent of the infection, the most
frequently represented are Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Escherichia coli.6Most splenic abscesses are caused by
a source of infection originating from outside of the
affected organ. Sengupta and Mukhergi7 determined
that 70% of splenic abscesses were caused by infectious
sources external to the spleen such as amoebic dysen-tery, peritonsillar abscess, bacterial endocarditis, lung
abscess, appendicitis, or pneumonia. An additional 15%
were related to direct trauma to the spleen, and 10%
were a result of sepsis.
We present a case of splenic abscess secondary to uro-
sepsis, an infection of the urogenital tract that occurs
when bacteria are introduced, which was detected and
monitored by sonography. In this case, a prior medical
procedure, a transrectal sonography-guided prostate
biopsy, allowed E coli to travel to the spleen via the
bloodstream.
Case Report
A man in his mid-50s underwent a transrectal sonography-
guided prostate biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific
antigen (PSA). Bactrim, a preparation of sulfamethoxazole
and trimethoprim, had been given for perioperative pro-
phylaxis. Four days after the procedure, the patientreturned to the emergency room (ER) with a high-grade
fever and abdominal pain. The urinalysis was positive for
E coli, and urosepsis was determined to be secondary to
the transrectal sonography-guided prostate biopsy.
Antibiotic therapy using IV vancomycin (a drug choice
usually reserved for treatment of bacterial infections
resistant to other drugs) was administered. Nineteen days
after the procedure, the patient presented a second time
to the ER with a moderate-grade fever, chills, rigors, and
increased abdominal pain in the left upper quadrant. A
complete abdominal sonographic examination was done
using a Philips IU22 system (Koninklijke, The Netherlands)with a curved linear-array 6-MHz transducer that showed
an abscess in the spleen. The abscess was noted to be
located in the posterior spleen. Abscess volume of 90.4;
mL was calculated using the splenic volume calculation
JDMXXX10.1177/87547912442110McKi
1Diagnostic Medical Ultrasound, School of Health Professions,
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
Corresponding Author:
Elizabeth Ruzicka McKinney, BS, RDMS, University of Missouri, 3805
North Cottonwood Court, Columbia, MO 65202, USA
Email: [email protected]
Splenic Abscess Detection
and Monitoring Using Sonography
Elizabeth Ruzicka McKinney, BS, RDMS1
Abstract
The finding of a splenic abscess is rare, with only 500 to 600 cases ever having been reported internationally. Priorto the advent of sonography and computed tomography, the survival rate for an individual with a splenic abscess was
0%. Present-day real-time imaging with sonography allows for accurate diagnosis of an abscess in the spleen versusrupture, hematoma, splenomegaly, or cyst within the spleen or left kidney. Until recently, the prescribed treatment
was splenectomy. The increased understanding of splenic abscess etiology and advancements in pharmacology haveallowed the treatment to progress from surgical removal of the entire spleen to draining the abscess using fine-needle
aspiration with the use of strong broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics.
Keywords
splenic abscess, ultrasonography, sonography, sepsis
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
2/7
McKinney 169
package based on measurements of the abscess length(6.40 cm), height (6.26 cm), and width (4.30 cm)
(Figures 1 and 2). The abscess had an oval, anechoic
appearance with well-defined borders and strong poste-
rior enhancement. No inflammatory rim or isoechoic
infiltrations were detected. A peripherally inserted central
catheter line was established for the administration of
ceftriaxone, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic
with broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive and
gram-negative bacteria. After 14 days of 2 mg IV ceftri-
axone daily, a 91% reduction of the abscess volume was
visualized on a follow-up sonogram (Figures 3 and 4). In
addition to its smaller size (3.30 2.81 1.70 cm; 8.07mL), the abscess had also lost its anechoic appearance.
The shape was more round than oval, the borders were
not as well defined, and most of the abscess was
isoechoic to slightly hypoechoic compared with the
spleen. The location of the abscess was isolated to the
most posterior section of the spleen with only moderate
posterior enhancement. The patient continued ceftriax-
one antibiotic therapy for another 14 days, at which time
a repeat sonogram showed an additional 1% reduction in
volume. The abscess was measured as 2.92 2.23 2.14
cm (7.30 mL), with only a slight posterior enhancement
Figure 1.Long view of splenic abscess, 6.40 cm length and4.30 cm height, 15 days after diagnosis of Escherichia coliandurosepsis secondary to a transrectal sonography-guidedprostate biopsy that was done 19 days prior.
Figure 2.Transverse view of splenic abscess, 6.26 cm width,15 days after diagnosis of Escherichia coliand urosepsissecondary to a transrectal sonography-guided prostate biopsythat was done 19 days prior.
Figure 3.Long view of splenic abscess, 3.30 cm lengthand 1.66 cm height, 15 days after beginning treatment withintravenous ceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
Figure 4.Transverse view of splenic abscess, 2.81 cmwidth, 15 days after beginning treatment with intravenousceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
3/7
170 Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography28(4)
(Figures 5 and 6). An additional antibiotic treatment with
augmentin, twice a day, for 28 days was prescribed. The
abscess was noted to be further reduced in size to 1.96
2.19 1.67 cm (3.73 mL), a 96% reduction of the origi-
nal abscess. Its appearance was isoechoic to the spleenwith no posterior enhancement (Figures 7 and 8). The
remaining slightly echogenic borders were the only
detectable evidence of the abscess.
Discussion
Splenic abscess is a rare finding caused by infectious
sources external to the spleen, direct trauma to the
spleen, or a result of sepsis.3,4,69They are found more
often in adults as a singular unilocular abnormality and
more often in children as multiple or multilocular abnor-
malities. Sepsis may be secondary to a variety of sources
such as endocarditis, dental infections, or, as in the
case presented, urosepsis. Sepsis will occur when an
infection leads to systemic inflammatory response
syndrome,10 the dysregulation of the inflammatory
response with excessive and uncontrolled release of pro-inflammatory mediators. It can lead to apnea, abnormal
organ function, changes in mental function, decreased
urine output, and disseminated intravascular coagulopa-
thy, forming microthrombi or other blood abnormalities.
If severe, sepsis can lead to septic shock and hypoten-
sion, hypoperfusion of one or more organs, and eventu-
ally end-organ ischemia. Early detection is essential for
a favorable prognosis, and treatment with antibiotics
should be started as soon as possible after diagnosis. For
every hour of delay in beginning treatment with the
correct antibiotic therapy, there is a correlating 7% rise
in mortality.
11
Figure 5.Long view of splenic abscess, 2.92 cm lengthand 2.14 cm height, 30 days after continued treatment withintravenous ceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
Figure 6.Transverse view of splenic abscess, 2.23 cmwidth, 30 days after continued treatment with intravenousceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
Figure 7.Long view of splenic abscess, 1.96 cm length and1.67 cm height, 28 days after oral administration of augmentinand 30 days of treatment with intravenous ceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
Figure 8.Transverse view of splenic abscess, 2.19 cm width,28 days after oral administration of augmentin and 30 days oftreatment with intravenous ceftriaxone 2 mg/d.
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
4/7
McKinney 171
In the case presented, a splenic abscess was a result of
a prior medical procedure, a transrectal sonography-
guided prostate biopsy, which allowed E colito become
translocated via the bloodstream to the spleen. A potential
contributing factor in this particular case was the patients
prior history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) and osteoarthritis. He was taking albuterol to
help manage the COPD, a steroid that reduces the bodys
inflammatory response. This may have reduced the abil-
ity of the patients immune system to respond to the
infection resulting from the transrectal sonography-
guided prostate biopsy.
Transrectal sonography-guided prostate biopsy is fre-
quently associated with minor complications (60%79%
of cases) but rarely with major complications that require
hospitalization (0.4%3.5% of cases).1214Early compli-
cations of transrectal sonography-guided prostate biopsy
include hematuria (70.8%) and rectal bleeding (8.3%).
Delayed complications of transrectal sonography-guidedprostate biopsy, at 3 to 7 days postbiopsy, include persis-
tent hematuria (47.1%), vague pelvic discomfort (13.2%),
hematochezia (rectal bleeding) (9.1%), dysuria (9.1%),
and hematospermia (blood in the semen) (9.1%). Even
though complications from transrectal sonography-guided
prostate biopsies are fairly common, a study by Paterson
et al12determined that only 0.23% of 4749 outpatients in
whom transrectal sonography-guided prostate biopsies
were performed between 2001 and 2006 were positive for
urosepsis. A recently tested protocol included obtaining
colon swabs from the patient prior to the transrectal
sonography procedure to determine the sensitivity of theflora.14Antibiotic prophylaxis was then selected to reflect
the organisms encountered and their susceptibilities,
decreasing the infective complications.
Sonography was an essential element in the diagnosis
and surveillance during the course of treatment in this
case of splenic abscess. Sonography allowed a noninva-
sive, rapid accurate diagnosis of an abscess in the spleen
versus possible diagnoses of rupture, hematoma, spleno-
megaly, or cyst. The ability of sonography to monitor the
splenic abscess allowed the treatment with strong broad-
spectrum IV antibiotics to run its course without the need
for splenectomy or other invasive procedures.
Conclusion
The use of imaging modalities such as sonography can
confirm or rule out a splenic abscess in a febrile patient
with left upper quadrant pain. If such an abscess is not
detected and treated with antibiotics early, it may become
severe and rapidly life-threatening with a mortality rate
up to 47%.9 The ability of sonography to monitor the
effectiveness of the antibiotics being administered has
allowed successful pharmacologic treatment of splenic
abscesses and avoided invasive procedures and splenec-
tomy with its surgical risks and long-term consequences.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Sharlette D. Anderson, MHS, RDMS, RVT,
RDCS, and Ecaterina M. Hdeib, MA, RDMS, for their encour-
agement and help in writing and editing this case study.
Declaration of Conflicting Interest
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research and/or
authorship of this article.
References
1. Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Mathews BD, Joels CS,
Sing RF, Heinford BT: Laparoscopic splenectomy for
splenic abscess. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
2004;14:289291.
2. Phillips GS, Radosevich MD, Lipsett PA: Splenic abscess:
another look at an old disease.Arch Surg1997;132:13311336.
3. Ghidirim G, Rojnoveanu G, Misin I, Gagauz I, Gurghis R:
Splenic abscess-etiology, clinical and diagnostic features.
Chirurgia (Bucar)2007;102:309314.
4. Ulhaci N, Meteoglu I, Kacar F, Ozbas S: Abscess of the
spleen. Pathol Onocol Res2004;10:234236.
5. Sieler LA: Sonography of the spleen: a review. J Diagn
Med Sonography1987;3:69. 6. Westh H, Reines E, Skibsted L: Splenic abscesses: a review
of 20 cases. Scand J Infect Dis1990;22(5):569573.
7. Sengupta D, Mukhergi B: Ameobic abscess of the spleen.
J Ind Assoc1975;64:4547.
8. Chang KC, Chuah SK, Changchien CS, et al: Clinical
characteristics and prognostic factors of splenic abscess:
a review of 67 cases in a single medical center of Taiwan.
World J Gastroenterol2006;12(3):460464.
9. Alvi AR, Kulsoom S, Shamsi G: Splenic abscess: out-
come and prognostic factors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
2008;18(12):740743.
10. Bone R, Balk R, Cerra F, et al: Definitions for sepsis andorgan failure and guidelines for the use of innovative thera-
pies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference
Committee. Chest1992;101(6):16441655.
11. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al: Surviving Sep-
sis Campaign: international guidelines for management
of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med
2008;36(1):296327.
12. Paterson RF, Buckley AR, Bryce E: TRUS and prostate
biopsy sepsis. http://www.urologyrounds.com/files/PDF/
jan-30-08.pdf
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
5/7
172 Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography28(4)
13. Jesitus J: Prostate biopsy infections major concern
for urologist. Urol Times. 2011 May 15. http://www.
modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/article/article-
Detail.jsp?id=722434&sk=&date%OA%09%09%09&
page=2
14. Madden T, Doble A, Aliyu SH, Neal DE: Infective com-
plications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate
biopsy following a new protocol for antibiotic prophy-
laxis aimed at reducing hospital-acquired infections. BJU
Int2011;108(10):15971602.
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
6/7
Article: Splenic Abscess Detection and Monitoring
Using Sonography
Author: Elizabeth Ruzicka McKinney, BS, RDMS
Category: Abdomen
Credit: 1 SDMS CME credit
Objectives: After studying the article titled Splenic
Abscess Detection and Monitoring Using Sonography,
you will be able to:
1. Describe the common pathogenic mechanisms for
splenic infections.2. Discuss the sonographic features of a splenic
abscess.
3. Develop a sonographic follow-up protocol for
assessing the treatment of a splenic abscess.
1. Possible pathogenesis for splenic infections
resulting in splenic abscess is typically defined by
how many categories?
a. Two
b. Three
c. Four
d. Five
2. The most frequent gram-negative bacillus causing
splenic abscess is
a. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
b. Helicobacter pylori
c. Klebsiella pneumoniae
d. Escherichia coli
3. What percentage of the time are splenic abscesses
caused by infectious sources external to the spleen?a. 70%
b. 75%
c. 80%
d. 85%
4. Early sonographic features of a splenic abscess
include the following except
a. Inflammatory rim
b. Well-defined borders
c. Oval shape
d. Posterior enhancement
JDMXXX10.1177/8754791245270 JDMSMedical Sonography
JDMS CME ArticleSDMS
CME Creditavailable to SDMS Members Only
SDMS members can earn FREE SDMS CME credit by reading this approved CME
article and successfully completing the online CME test. If you are not a current SDMS
member but would like to earn SDMS CME credit, please visit www.sdms.org/
membership/ to join SDMS.
Instructions
1. Each question has only one correct answer.2. Go online to www.sdms.org/members/JDMS/ to score your test answers (SDMS membership number
required). NO JDMS CME tests will be accepted by mail or FAX.
3. You will receive your test score results immediately*if you achieve a score of 70% or better, SDMS CME
credit will be awarded.
4. Awarded CME credits are tracked in the SDMS CMETracker system. For more information about the SDMS
CMETracker system, visit www.sdms.org/members/cmetracker.asp.
*Because the correct answers will be provided after you submit your answers, only one attempt is permitted to
successfully complete the JDMS CME article test. Please verify your answers before submission.
8/9/2019 Splenic Abscess Detection
7/7
174 Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography28(4)
5. Late sonographic features of a splenic abscess
include the following except
a. Rounded shape
b. Iso/hypoechoic interior
c. Well-defined borders
d. Posterior enhancement
6. Splenic abscesses in children are most likely to
appear as a
a. Unilocular abnormality
b. Multilocular abnormality
c. Singular abnormality
d. Hyperechoic, irregular abnormality
7. If not treated early and aggressively, the mortal-
ity secondary to splenic abscess can be as high
as
a. 35%40%
b. 45%50%c. 55%60%
d. 65%70%
8. For every hour of delay in the onset of treatment
for a splenic abscess, morality increases by
a. 3%
b. 5%
c. 7%
d. 9%
9. The most common complication of sonography-
guided prostate biopsy is
a. Pelvic discomfort
b. Hematuria
c. Rectal bleeding
d. Dysuria
10. Urosepsis occurs with approximately what fre-
quency following sonography-guided prostate
biopsy?
a. 2%
b. 1%c. 0.5%
d. 0.25%