Upload
fay-lambert
View
228
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPIS-Elena - Tramways in Skåne
Light rail day, 8 november 2011
Marcus Horning, project manager, SPIS-Elena
Background the SPIS collaboration
• Common study (2007). Region Skåne, Malmö, Lund, Helsingborg and the National Railway Administration
• Analyzing:• Expected passengers • Economy • City development • Physical conditions in the
cities • Environmetal effects • Congestion • Regional development
Background the SPIS collaboration
• Cooperation is formalized in 2010 with political steering committee
• Partners: The Region of Skåne and the cities of Malmö, Lund and Helsingborg, in Sweden.
• The SPIS investment programme consists of the coordinated planning and implementation of a new tramway network in Lund, Malmö and Helsingborg.
Why joint venture?
•Rather small systems in each city
•One common system in the future
•Common maintenance and operation in the future
•Joint procurement – larger volume, better price
•The same technique for track and vehicles
•The same design principles
•The same design guidelines
Main projects in the SPIS- collaboration
New tramway line in LundNumber of lines: 1 lineNumber of stops: 9New trams: 8
New tramway lines in Malmö Number of lines: 2 linesNumber of stops: 35 New trams: 23
New tramway line in Helsingborg Number of lines: 1 lineNumber of stops: 13New trams: 11
Elena application fall 2010
ELENA application sent to EIB December 2010. May 2011 – application granted
•3,3 million euro til May 2014
•90 % Elena 10% divided by all parties
•25 times the leverage factor must be met before project period ends - this means an investment of 83 million euro
•Main purpose – to achieve energy efficient public transport!
Elena application fall 2010 – energy savings2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Energy saving Lund Bus -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304 -3304(MWh/yr) Tram 819 819 819 819 819 819Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -5093 -8156 -9688 -10187 -10187 -10187Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -3164 -5067 -6018 -6328 -6328 -6328
Total -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -19000 -19000Energy saving Malmö Bus -10192 -10192 -10192 -10192(MWh/yr) Tram 3526 3526 3526 3526Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -13846 -22154 -26308 -27693Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -8602 -13762 -16343 -17203
Total -29114 -42583 -49317 -51562Energy saving Helsingborg Bus -4760 -4760(MWh/yr) Tram 2048 2048Largescale public transport efforts and strategy* Reduced cartrips -11909 -12033Strategic largescale Mobility management* Reduced cartrips -7398 -7475
Total -22019 -22219-10743 -15708 -47305 -61583 -90337 -92781
Delays without ELENA regarding Energy savingsLund Total -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -19000 -19000
Malmö Total (opens 2018 instead) -29114 -42583
Helsingborg Total (open 2020 instead)
TOTAL Energy savings SPIS (MWh/yr) without ELENA -10743 -15708 -18191 -19000 -48114 -61583
Difference ELENA/without ELENA (percentage) 100 100 38 31 53 66
SPIS ELENASPIS Post-ELENA
TOTAL Energy saving SPIS (MWh/yr)
Aims and goals - with SPIS-Elena
•Energy efficient light rail in Skane – sustainable development
•Optimize the cooperation of the partners involved and the implementation – save time and money
•Investigate common questions – create synergy, one plattform
•Collectively communicate the project - open source
Consortium organisation Tramways in Skane
Political steering committee of SPIS
Head of chief committe of SPIS
WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena
WP 2 Vehicles
WP 3 Financing
WP 4 Design
WP 5 Main-
tenance
WP 6 Communication
Staff and SPIS-office
Recruting staff
•Project manager (100%)•Controller (50%)•Tendering expert (100%)•Tram expert (100%)•Project strategist (50%)•Communicator (100%)•Project coordinator 1 (100%)•Project coordinator 2 (100%)•Project coordinator 3 (100%)
WP 1 Project management of SPIS-Elena Project plan - Content
•Coordinate and lead the work•Define administative processes•Budget and timeframe•Reporting•Budget - 142 000 euro
WP 2 Vehicles
Project plan - Content
•Investigate system for – energy, technique, electricity etc•Defining maintence approach•Support for tendering preparation•Tendering•Ordering•Budget - 310 000 euro
WP 3 Financing
Project plan - Content
•Financial strategy•Different financing alternatives•Negotiation package•Successive calculation•Investigation – traffic, stages, financing sources, alternative costs etc•Budget - 180 000 euro
WP 4 Design
Project plan - Content
•Largest package•Links all WPs•Develop common standards – optimize together not seperatly•Define the most energy effective design – support model split to energy efficient public transport•Budget - 950 000 euro
WP 5 Maintenance
Project plan - Content
•Long term package•Joint maintenance system – energy and resource effective life cycle•Innovative quality system – secures a reliable and attracitve system support the modal split•60 000 euro
WP 6 Communication
Project plan - Content
•Joint communication strategy – better effect, exchange of knowledge, effective use of resources•Strategy which connects goals, challanges and opportunites•Communication plans – different target groups•(Budget – 200 000 euro not Elena funding)
Time plan
WP 1 Project managment
WP 2 Vehicles
WP 3 Finance
WP 4 Design
WP 5 Maintenance
WP 6 Communication
2011 2012 2013 2014Maj Juni
Today
EIB report
Thank you