111
Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Overview of Available Screening Methods Thursday, June 28, 2018 Dial in: 866.740.1260 (passcode 4852701#)

Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Overview of Available Screening ......Analysis. Answers. Action. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Overview of Available Screening Methods Thursday, June 28, 2018 Dial

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening MethodsThursday June 28 2018

Dial in 8667401260(passcode 4852701)

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

This webinar was supported by Cooperative Agreement 5NU60OE000103 funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

AgendaModerator Patricia Hunt Texas Department of State Health Services

100 - 105 Welcome and Introduction105 - 120 Overview of Available Screening Methods

Francis Lee PhD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

120 ndash 200 State Implementation Experiences NY MA UT MNMichele Caggana ScD FACMG New York State Department of Health Wadsworth CenterAnne Comeau PhD New England Newborn Screening ProgramAndy Rohrwasser PhD MBA Utah Department of HealthCarrie Wolf MBS Minnesota Department of Health

200 ndash 215 Overview of Second Tier Screening MethodsMei Baker MD FACMG Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene

215 - 230 QampA and Closing

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

APHL SMA Webinar June 28 2019

Newborn Screening Translational Research InitiativeNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch CDC

Francis Lee MSc PhD

Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the US

SMA is the leading genetic cause of death among infants

A neuromuscular disease caused by progressive degeneration of motor neurons

Major signs and symptoms include loss of normal motor function and respiratory difficultyfailurecan result in death in severe cases

3 clinical types based on age of onset and severityType I Birth ndash 6 mos

Type II 6 mos ndash 2 yearsType III 18 mos ndash 3+ years

Birth prevalence 1 10000

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

This webinar was supported by Cooperative Agreement 5NU60OE000103 funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC or the Department of Health and Human Services

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

AgendaModerator Patricia Hunt Texas Department of State Health Services

100 - 105 Welcome and Introduction105 - 120 Overview of Available Screening Methods

Francis Lee PhD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

120 ndash 200 State Implementation Experiences NY MA UT MNMichele Caggana ScD FACMG New York State Department of Health Wadsworth CenterAnne Comeau PhD New England Newborn Screening ProgramAndy Rohrwasser PhD MBA Utah Department of HealthCarrie Wolf MBS Minnesota Department of Health

200 ndash 215 Overview of Second Tier Screening MethodsMei Baker MD FACMG Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene

215 - 230 QampA and Closing

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

APHL SMA Webinar June 28 2019

Newborn Screening Translational Research InitiativeNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch CDC

Francis Lee MSc PhD

Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the US

SMA is the leading genetic cause of death among infants

A neuromuscular disease caused by progressive degeneration of motor neurons

Major signs and symptoms include loss of normal motor function and respiratory difficultyfailurecan result in death in severe cases

3 clinical types based on age of onset and severityType I Birth ndash 6 mos

Type II 6 mos ndash 2 yearsType III 18 mos ndash 3+ years

Birth prevalence 1 10000

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

AgendaModerator Patricia Hunt Texas Department of State Health Services

100 - 105 Welcome and Introduction105 - 120 Overview of Available Screening Methods

Francis Lee PhD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

120 ndash 200 State Implementation Experiences NY MA UT MNMichele Caggana ScD FACMG New York State Department of Health Wadsworth CenterAnne Comeau PhD New England Newborn Screening ProgramAndy Rohrwasser PhD MBA Utah Department of HealthCarrie Wolf MBS Minnesota Department of Health

200 ndash 215 Overview of Second Tier Screening MethodsMei Baker MD FACMG Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene

215 - 230 QampA and Closing

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

APHL SMA Webinar June 28 2019

Newborn Screening Translational Research InitiativeNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch CDC

Francis Lee MSc PhD

Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the US

SMA is the leading genetic cause of death among infants

A neuromuscular disease caused by progressive degeneration of motor neurons

Major signs and symptoms include loss of normal motor function and respiratory difficultyfailurecan result in death in severe cases

3 clinical types based on age of onset and severityType I Birth ndash 6 mos

Type II 6 mos ndash 2 yearsType III 18 mos ndash 3+ years

Birth prevalence 1 10000

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

APHL SMA Webinar June 28 2019

Newborn Screening Translational Research InitiativeNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch CDC

Francis Lee MSc PhD

Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the US

SMA is the leading genetic cause of death among infants

A neuromuscular disease caused by progressive degeneration of motor neurons

Major signs and symptoms include loss of normal motor function and respiratory difficultyfailurecan result in death in severe cases

3 clinical types based on age of onset and severityType I Birth ndash 6 mos

Type II 6 mos ndash 2 yearsType III 18 mos ndash 3+ years

Birth prevalence 1 10000

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

SMA is the leading genetic cause of death among infants

A neuromuscular disease caused by progressive degeneration of motor neurons

Major signs and symptoms include loss of normal motor function and respiratory difficultyfailurecan result in death in severe cases

3 clinical types based on age of onset and severityType I Birth ndash 6 mos

Type II 6 mos ndash 2 yearsType III 18 mos ndash 3+ years

Birth prevalence 1 10000

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Newborn screening for SMA can lead to early diagnosis and treatment

Average Delay in Diagnosis of SMA

In SMA type 1 motor neuronal death begins perinatally gt90 loss within 6 months

FDA approved drug available since December 2016

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorder in Newborns and Children

Submitted recommendation to the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ldquoExpand the Recommend Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) to include the addition of SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1rdquo Mar 8 2018

Deputy HHS Secretary interim response ndash April 19 2018will provide ldquodetailed response regarding actions on therecommendation within 120 daysrdquo

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Different molecular assays have been used to detect SMA

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) analysis

High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Luminex Genotyping

DNA sequencing

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR)

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA

Real-time PCR allows for high throughput screening

Most state newborn screening labs are already using this method to detect Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Labs are equipped with the necessary instrumentation Staff is familiar with procedure

Reactions can be multiplexed into current SCID assay

Reduced the cost of adding SMA Does not require added labor cost to run

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

New York (hospital-based project) target SMN1 Exon 7 (MGB probe Maranda et al

Clin Chem 45 88 2012)

CDC ver 1 target SMN1 Exon 7 ndash Intron 7 (LNA probe and LNA rev primer)

CDC ver 2 target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

Perkin Elmer target SMN1 Exon 7 (LNA probe)

SMA Real time PCR Taqman assays used in state newborn screening labs

adopted by New England NBS lab in stand-alone assay adopted by UT and MN NBS labs in multiplex assay with TREC

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Process of method development is iterative and may result in various improvements to the design of an assay 13

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Challenge 1

Exons 6 Intron 6 Exon 8Intron 7Exon 7

G C A A G SMN1

SMN2A T G G A

Only 5 nucleotide differences between the two genes in this region

It is critical to avoid cross signal from SMN2 when trying to identify the

loss of SMN1

SMN1 has a paralog the SMN2 gene which has nearly identical genomic sequence

Need to be able to discriminate single nucleotide polymorphism

c840 CgtT

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

LNA A modified RNA nucleotide withextra bridge connecting the 2 oxygenand 4 carbon

locks the ribose in the 3-endoconformation

Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) NucleotideUse of LNA (locked nucleic acid) nucleotides can distinguish single nucleotide polymorphism

PCR primers and probes with some nucleotides substituted by LNAs can differentiate single nucleotide mismatch

LNA primers and probes can be ordered from multiple commercial sources

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

The LNA modified probe (in green) was designed to selectively bind SMN1 by discriminating between the mismatch nucleotides of SMN1and SMN2

SMN1 nucleotide A and SMN2 nucleotide (G) Forward and reverse primers (in grey) will amplify both SMN1 and

SMN2 sequences

Initial SMA assay developed at CDC targeted intron 7 sequence

Taylor J Lee FK Yazdanpanah G et al Clin Chem (2015) 61 (2) 412-9

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Initially we developed an SMA assay targeting the intron 7 of the SMN1 gene assuming that deletion will always involve both exon and intron 7

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

bull Taiwan pilot newborn screening for SMAFeasibility trial for pre-symptomatic diagnosis

Nov 2014 ndash Sept 2016

Total Screened 120267bull Tier-One Positive 15 (by absence of SMN1 intron 7)

bull Tier-Two Positive and Confirmed 7 (by ddPCR amp MLPA)

Challenge 2 Chimeric gene

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017)

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Exon 7

Exon 7 Exon 8

C

T

A

G

SMN1

SMN2Intron 7

Intron 7 Exon 8

Exon 7

Exon 7

C

T A

False positive

False negative Exon 8

Intron 7 Exon 8

Intron 7

G

8120000 (lt 001)

Cases identified unknown prevalence

Yin-Hsiu C et al The Journal of Pediatrics (2017) Hahnen E et al Am J Hum Genet (1996) 59 1057-1065

False positive due to recombination between SMN1and SMN2 resulting in a hybrid genotype

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

We replaced the reverse primer with an SMN1-specific LNA primer (in yellow) to eliminate SMN2 amplification

The LNA probe targets the exon 7 region with the mismatch between SMN1 C and SMN2 (T)

Assay has two layers of specificity to eliminate any X-reaction to SMN2

Revised SMA Assay ver 1 ndash Target exon 7

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATGATCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Assay ver 1 - specificity improves by adding LNA primer

SMA patient samples

RPP30

RPP30

No background signal from SMN2 (maximum sensitivity in detecting SMN1 absence) However no signal if either SMN1 exon or intron is absent Requires confirmation with second tier assay specific for exon 7 or intron 7

SMA patient samples

SMN1 signal

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Sensitive to quality of DNA extract

Sensitive to type of Taqman master mix

Sensitive to temperature accuracy

PCR efficiency around 90

Limitations associated with LNA primer

While highly specific LNA primers are technically more demanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Potential pitfalls associated with assay that uses both an LNA probe and LNA primer1313This is why it is important to test these new methods in the field to ensure that the method is ldquoFIT FOR PURPOSErdquo13If you find that there are one or two unexpected results that need re-testing hellip this would be indication for further redesign of the assay13

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Revised SMA Assay ver 2 ndash Targeting exon 7

Reverse primer moved to exon 7 region the unmodified forward and reverse primer will amplify exon 7 of both SMN1 and 2

The LNA probe (in green) for exon 7 was further optimized for maximum specificity

Characters in red = SMN 1(2) exon 7

CTTGTGAAACAAAATGCTTTTTAACATCCATATAAAGCTATCTATATATAGCTATCTATG(A)TCTATATAGCTATTTTTTTTAACTTCCTTTATTTTCCTTACAGGGTTTC(T)AGACAAAATCAAAAAGAAGGAAGGTGCTCACATTCCTTAAATTAAGGAGTAAGTCTGCCAGCATTATGAAAGTGAATCTTACTTTTGTAAAACTTTATGGTTTGTGGAAAACAAATGTTTTTGAACATTTAAAAAGTTCAGATGTTAA(G)AAAGTTGAAAGGTTAATGTAAAACAATCAATATTAAAGAATTTTGATGCCAAAACTATTAGATAAAAGGTTAATCTACATCCCTACT

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Note that both SMN1 and SMN2 will amplify using these primers discrimination will be dependent on probe13

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Factors important in the design of LNA probe for mismatch discrimination

short length (10-12 nucleotides)

Location of mismatch nucleotide in the center of probe

LNA substitution in triplet at site of mismatch

Probe with LNA modification of pyrimidine (C or T) at mismatch site within probe

LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity

You Y et al Nucleic Acids Research (2006) 34(8)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We reviewed a checklist of characteristics that would be important in the design of the probe13We checked off the first three 13Had opportunity to address the fourth1313Already had probe at the right location 13Limited to the region and did not have a lot of options for changes13However the area that we focused on was the the pyrimidinepurine discrimination1313

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

The Assay ver 2 utilizes an SMN1-specific LNA probe with forward strand sequence

We do not observe any non-specific signal in SMN1 null samples even when challenged with an excess of SMN2 sequence

0025

SMN2 synthetic gene fragment(equivalent to 1000 copiescell)

RPP30

SMN1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
When challenged using an excess of SMN2 an assay using a sense strand LNA probe gives no background amplification 13 in hopes to make the assay more specific and improve the robustness

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Normal Newborn SMA Infant SCID Positive Control

SMN1 can also be multiplexed into the current TREC assay (SMN1-TREC-RPP30)

TRECTREC

RPP30 SMN1 RPP30RPP30

SMN1

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Chart1

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000465
000659
0005
000228
000065
00025
000035
000035
000049
000585
000171
000563
000257
000044
00033
000289
000293
000486
000306
000664
000845
000122
00061
000791
000014
000183
000152
000125
000019
000177
000258
000161
000727
000563
001385
001422
002424
002644
00448
004793
007752
008173
011473
012891
015584
01862
000227
020046
024431
001384
024274
029658
003519
028239
034112
006535
031669
037871
012707
034282
04124
024234
036711
044042
043692
03892
045873
07163
040659
047675
1072
04148
049246
149167
04209
050216
192184
04282
051118
233981
043423
052223
274183
044164
053809
312234
04465
054911
346967
044971
05581
375964
045216
056725
402618
045497
05734
429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
Amplification Plots
E7 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000465
2 000228
3
4
5
6
7 000049
8 000171
9 000257
10 000289
11 000306
12 000122
13 000014
14 000152
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 000258
22 000727
23 001385
24 002424
25 00448
26 007752
27 011473
28 015584
29 020046
30 024274
31 028239
32 031669
33 034282
34 036711
35 03892
36 040659
37 04148
38 04209
39 04282
40 043423
41 044164
42 04465
43 044971
44 045216
45 045497
E7 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000659
2 000065
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 000044
10 000293
11 000664
12 00061
13 000183
14 000125
15
16
17 000019
18
19
20
21 000161
22 000563
23 001422
24 002644
25 004793
26 008173
27 012891
28 01862
29 024431
30 029658
31 034112
32 037871
33 04124
34 044042
35 045873
36 047675
37 049246
38 050216
39 051118
40 052223
41 053809
42 054911
43 05581
44 056725
45 05734
E7 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 0005
2 00025
3 000035
4
5
6 000035
7 000585
8 000563
9 00033
10 000486
11 000845
12 000791
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 000177
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 000227
29 001384
30 003519
31 006535
32 012707
33 024234
34 043692
35 07163
36 1072
37 149167
38 192184
39 233981
40 274183
41 312234
42 346967
43 375964
44 402618
45 429998

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
Normal Newborn

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

Chart1

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
000391
001319
00053
001223
000286
00092
000181
00064
000339
000641
000197
00035
000635
00047
000236
000273
000117
000339
00041
000416
000624
000382
000187
000304
000127
000564
000107
000087
001211
000023
000714
000323
00004
000063
00005
00005
000166
000683
001629
003329
00616
009914
000005
014004
000264
018079
000631
02196
001519
025448
004384
000221
027985
009784
000501
030198
019932
000912
03242
038118
000963
034013
064838
001016
035468
100418
00096
036525
141545
000582
037033
183227
000476
037865
225898
000479
038849
26723
000373
039426
304741
000155
03977
337242
000009
040339
36549
041183
391684
041887
413818
042534
432002
043039
445271
043321
456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
Amplification Plots
D5 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 000391
2 00053
3 000286
4 000181
5 000339
6 00035
7 000236
8 000339
9 000416
10 000382
11 000304
12 000127
13 000107
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29 000221
30 000501
31 000912
32 000963
33 001016
34 00096
35 000582
36 000476
37 000479
38 000373
39 000155
40 000009
41
42
43
44
45
D5 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001319
2 001223
3 00092
4 00064
5 000641
6 000635
7 000273
8
9
10
11
12
13 000087
14 000023
15
16 00004
17 00005
18 00005
19 000166
20 000683
21 001629
22 003329
23 00616
24 009914
25 014004
26 018079
27 02196
28 025448
29 027985
30 030198
31 03242
32 034013
33 035468
34 036525
35 037033
36 037865
37 038849
38 039426
39 03977
40 040339
41 041183
42 041887
43 042534
44 043039
45 043321
D5 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5 000197
6 00047
7 000117
8 00041
9 000624
10 000187
11
12 000564
13 001211
14 000714
15 000323
16 000063
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000005
25 000264
26 000631
27 001519
28 004384
29 009784
30 019932
31 038118
32 064838
33 100418
34 141545
35 183227
36 225898
37 26723
38 304741
39 337242
40 36549
41 391684
42 413818
43 432002
44 445271
45 456788

20130919_repeat_Biogen samples

D5 CY5
D5 HEX
D5 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0
E7 CY5
E7 HEX
E7 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
0
0
0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45
0 0 0

Chart1

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)
001122
000634
000211
0001
000058
000112
000116
000223
000338
000078
000026
000676
000443
000352
000079
000268
000147
000114
000362
000065
000347
000091
000381
000285
000276
000169
000225
000052
000141
000223
000048
001033
000636
002012
001736
003503
003137
000186
006356
005547
000757
010249
008862
000881
014229
012695
000452
018693
017104
000177
023574
021563
00005
027859
025389
031711
028485
000158
035017
030969
000587
037733
033238
000309
040598
035473
043338
037481
045262
039255
047054
040386
048788
041411
000076
049903
042682
000061
051262
043772
052554
045192
000221
053297
046421
000074
053941
04754
05436
048362
054624
048757

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
23 23 23
24 24 24
25 25 25
26 26 26
27 27 27
28 28 28
29 29 29
30 30 30
31 31 31
32 32 32
33 33 33
34 34 34
35 35 35
36 36 36
37 37 37
38 38 38
39 39 39
40 40 40
41 41 41
42 42 42
43 43 43
44 44 44
45 45 45

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits
Amplification Plots
C2 CY5 Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4 0001
5 000058
6
7 000116
8 000078
9
10
11
12 000147
13
14
15 000091
16 000285
17 000169
18
19
20 000052
21 000223
22 001033
23 002012
24 003503
25 006356
26 010249
27 014229
28 018693
29 023574
30 027859
31 031711
32 035017
33 037733
34 040598
35 043338
36 045262
37 047054
38 048788
39 049903
40 051262
41 052554
42 053297
43 053941
44 05436
45 054624
C2 ROX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
C2 HEX Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1 001122
2 000634
3 000211
4
5
6 000112
7 000223
8 000026
9
10
11 000079
12 000114
13
14
15
16 000276
17 000225
18
19
20 000141
21 000048
22 000636
23 001736
24 003137
25 005547
26 008862
27 012695
28 017104
29 021563
30 025389
31 028485
32 030969
33 033238
34 035473
35 037481
36 039255
37 040386
38 041411
39 042682
40 043772
41 045192
42 046421
43 04754
44 048362
45 048757
C2 FAM Cycles Fluorescence (dRn)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 000338
8 000676
9 000443
10 000352
11 000268
12 000362
13 000065
14 000347
15 000381
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 000186
25 000757
26 000881
27 000452
28 000177
29 00005
30
31 000158
32 000587
33 000309
34
35
36
37
38 000076
39 000061
40
41 000221
42 000074
43
44
45

20130919_Biogen samples - Chart

C2 CY5
C2 HEX
C2 FAM
Cycles
Fluorescence (dRn)

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA patients are correctly identified from dried blood spots when using the multiplex assay

Presenter
Presentation Notes
13Results from multiplex real-time PCR assay including SMN1 RPP30 (Rnase P) and TREC1313identifies patients (N=11) as affected1313 identifies carriers (N=15) as unaffected13

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Technology Transfer to state newborn screening laboratories

Both versions of CDC SMA assay have been validated in state NBS labs and is being used in state-wide screening

Massachusetts (January 29 2018) Utah (January 29 2018) Minnesota (March 5 2018)

bull As of June gt 40000 newborns have been screenedbull Three SMA infants have been identified confirmed

and treated

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Discussion SMN1 assay is the first newborn screening 1st tier

test based on genotype alone

High specificity required to discriminate SMN2 sequence to avoid false negative results

Possible unknown non-pathogenic SNP if present in the probe region can potentially lead to false positive

Clinical diagnostic lab confirmation of screen positive cases and determination of SMN2 copy numbers are important for medical management

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

CDC SMA NBS resources available to state labs

If a state lab decides to try CDC assays we provide reagents (enough for assay development) primers and probe sequences QC materials and technical support

Hands-on technical training at CDC if requested

SMA positive QC dried blood spot material prepared from patient cell lines spiked into leukocyte - depleted blood

CDC started SMA pilot proficiency testing program in June 6 2018 (10 labs participating)

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

June 1 2018 SMA Newborn Screening Implementation Status ndash US States and Territories

WA

OR

NV

CA

AZ

ID

UT

MT

WY

CO

NM

TX

MNWI

MI

MS

FL

NY MACT

DE

ND

SD

NE

KS

OKAR

LAAL

GASC

NCTN

MO

IAIL IN OH

KY

WVVA

ME

NHVT

AK

HI

NJMD

PA

DC

PR

RI

Screening for SMA At planning stageCompleting assay validation

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Acknowledgments CDC Co-Investigators

Kristina MercerE Shannon TorresGolriz YazdanpanahSophia WinchesterRobert VogtHan PhanCarla Cuthbert

Taiwan CollaboratorsYin-Hsiu Chien Shu-Chuan ChiangWuh-Liang Hwu

State NBS lab collaboratorsMinnesota Berta Warman Carrie WolfNew JerseyAlyssa MacMillanWisconsinMei Baker Sean MochalMassachusettsAnne Comeau Lan Ji UtahAndreas RohrwasserKatelyn Logerquist

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Road NE Atlanta GA 30333Telephone 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)TTY 1-888-232-6348Visit wwwcdcgov | Contact CDC at 1-800-CDC-INFO or wwwcdcgovinfo

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Environmental HealthDivision of Laboratory Sciences

Use of trade names and commercial sources in this presentation is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention the Public Health Service or the US Department of Health and Human Services

Thank you for your attention

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Screening in New York StateAPHL Webinar ndash June 28 2018

Michele Caggana ScD FACMGDirector Newborn Screening ProgramWadsworth Center NYS Department of Health

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 32

Biogen Idec funded this study (screening recruitment)

Biogen had no role in data analysis interpretation or decisions regarding patient counseling or care

Disclosures

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 33

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Progressive degeneration amp loss of

spinal cord amp brainstem motor neurons Muscle weakness atrophy Difficulty breathing poor weight gain

pneumonia scoliosis joint contractures

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 34

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Most common genetic cause of infant amp toddler deathbull Incidence 1 in 6000 to 1 in 10000bull Carriers 1 in 50 to 1 in 60

SMA Incidence amp Genetics

95ndash98 homozygous deletion of Survival of Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) exon 7

T

genomic copies of SMN2 varies (0ndash5)uarr SMN2 asymp less severe later onset

SMN1C

6 7 8

full-length SMN (100)

truncated non-functional SMN (~85-95)full-length SMN (~5-15)

SMN2

SMN2 = SMN1 homologue (differ by few nucleotides | both code for SMN)

exon 1 2a 2b 3 4 5 6 7 8

SMN1 (5q13)

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 35

bull Useful for prognosis and management bull Based on age of onset and severitybull Correlation between SMN2 copy number and subtype

SMA Type

Age Dx

Life-span

Motor Function AchievedMajor Symptoms

SMN2 copy 1 2

Type I(Werdnig-Hoffmann)

lt6 mo le2 yr Never sit without supportProfound hypotonia and flaccidity no head control paradoxical breathing bell-shaped upper torso poor suck amp swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (7-13)2 (73-83)3 (4-20)4 (---)

Type II 6ndash12 mo

70 alive at 25 yr

Maintain sitting Never walk independentlyMuscle weakness kyphoscoliosis fine tremors weak swallow Respiratory and nutritional problems

1 (---)2 (11)3 (82)4 (7)

Type III(Kugelberg-Welander)

gt1 yr Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independently (ge25m)Variable weakness legs gtarms frequent falls lose ability to walk (childhood-adults) some use wheelchairs most w scoliosis No respiratory nutritional issues

1 (---)2 (0-4)3 (51-78)4 (22-46)

Type IV 20rsquosndash30rsquos

Adult Normal

Reach all major milestones walk independentlyVariable weakness walk as adults motor impairment mild No respiratory nutritional issues

12341Mailman 2002 Genet Med 2Feldkotter 2002 Am J Hum Genet

Age at onset symptoms severity and survival vary

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 36

Path to SMA Newborn Screening

photo March of Dimes

Important health problem Natural hx known Recognizable latent stage Biomarker amp test (2000rsquos) Acceptable Tx (2016) Demonstrated benefit of early

detection intervention amp Tx(2016)

Should SMA be screened

Screening criteria adapted from Wilson and Jungner (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 37

37

Nomination of SMA for addition to RUSP (2017)

Evidence review by ACHDNC NBS assay validated and implemented in traditional public

health lab Spinraza FDA-approved in 2016 Clinical trials (Spinraza AVXS-101) published in 2017

Recommendation to Secretary Newborn Screening for SMA due to homozygous deletion of exon 7 in SMN1 should be added to the RUSP as a core condition (February 8 2018 8-5 vote June 9 2018 was due)

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 38

Pilot Newborn Screening for SMA Columbia University Medical Center Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals and NYS Newborn Screening Program

Major Goals Develop SMN1 assay Demonstrate feasibility of high-throughput newborn SMA screening Offer screening assess uptake and outcomes including carrier status

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Manhattan4400 birthsyr

Weill-Cornell Medical CenterManhattan 5800 birthsyr

Allen HospitalUpper ManhattanBronx2000 birthsyr

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 39

Recruitment ‒ Opt-in modelHospitals - 3 NYC hospitals 12000 birthsyrMaterials - video amp brochureCoordinators - describe study answer questions obtain consent on tablet (REDCap) mark Guthrie card

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 40

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay No biomarker DNA-first test DNA extracted from dried

blood spot TaqMan real-time qPCR

assay SMN1 exon 71

RPPH1 (internal control gene)

ABI 7900HT QuantStudio12K Flex

ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

ge2 copies 1 copy 0 copies

REPORTCarrier

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further Action

Required

1Anhuf Eggermann Rudnik-Schoumlneborn Zerres (2003) Human Mutation22(1)74-8

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 41

SMA Assay Validation

45 Positive Controls

RPPH1 amplification

0 copies SMN1(2-ge4 copies SMN2)

ge1 copy SMN1(1-2 copies SMN2)

SMN1 amplification

4028 DBS

screen neg (3929)

het del (51)

borderline (14)

fail (34)

each point=mean RQ 3 replicates

Probe 5rsquo-FAM (SMN1)5rsquo-VIC (RPPH1)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQROX standard

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 42

Both detectors RPPH1 SMN1

Biogen Samples

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 43

Known 2 SMN1 copiesAs calibrators

0 copy SMN1 control

2 copies SMN1 control

1 copy SMN1 control

SMA AssayControls

All in triplicateRQ = relative quantity =

2^(-∆∆Ct)

∆Ct sample ndash cal median ∆Ct

FAM = SMN1 VIC = RPPH1

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 44

2 or more SMN1 copies

Equivocal (0001-0299 or 0600-0799

1 copy of SMN1

SMA AssayAll in triplicate

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 45

CV failure

Exon 7 DNA sequence

High CV X2 Equivocal X2 Equivocal on repeat 1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 46

ResultsJanuary 15 2016 ndash June 15 2018Infants screened 14089 (200 carriers)Opt in rate 91-93

False positives 0 (013214)False negatives 0 (013214)

250000 birthsyr25-40 SMAyr

Hospital Recruitment period Infants Screened

Carriers (Freq)

Morgan Stanley Childrenrsquos Hospital

1142016 ndash592018 5840 74 (1 in 79)

Weill-Cornell Medical Center

7132016 ndash592018 4851 95 (1 in 51)

Allen Hospital 1262016 ndash592018 2523 20 (1 in 126)

Total 13214 189 (1 in 70)

Retest rate ~1 mostly around carrier calls live = no CV fails

Presenter
Presentation Notes
WAL includes 1 rare variant carrier13Carriers include 1 hybrid gene and 1 carrier who also had a rare variant

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 47

Follow-up ndash Carriers

141 (16113) agreed to genetics referral‒ 733 (1115) made appt‒ 727 (811) maintained appt

photo Mass general

Most parents expressed concern after speaking with counselor expressed understanding of carrier status versus affectedldquo

429 (81189) knew they were carriers ‒ less concerned better understanding

Presenter
Presentation Notes
First 113 for GC referrals1313148 (28189) agreed to genetics referral13 Made appt13 Showed up

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 48

SMA Type 1 Natural Historybull Onset lt6 monthsbull Survival le2 yearsbull Major motor milestones reached

None never sit unassistedbull Sx Profound hypotonia and flaccidity

no head control poor suck amp swallow respiratory and nutritional problems

Affected infant identified by NBSGenotype SMN1 homozygous Δ exon 7 SMN2 2 copies

Predicts SMA type 1

29 months ndash tolerates medication meeting milestones on time walking running talking

Results

Presenter
Presentation Notes
She is now 27 months old

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 49

Results

RPPH1

SMN1

NTC

7900HT

SMA AssayDetected homozygous deletion

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 50

SMA newborn screening is feasible Sensitive specific robust high-throughput No false positivesnegatives

NYS families want testing (93) Carrier rate = 1 in 70 1 infant predicted to have type 1 infantile SMA

(1 in 13214) treated with nusinersen (Spinraza) asymptomatic at 29 months

Conclusions

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 51

Population-wide Screening in NYS Regulatory amendment (bill

pending currently)

Specialty Care Centers (certifying)

Genetics neuromuscular specialists (n = 11)

No carrier reporting Multiplex with severe combined

immunodeficiency (SCID) qPCR assay singlicate $010baby for SMA FOR TEST SMN2 dosage (digital droplet

PCR) about $25 per baby

Presenter
Presentation Notes

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 52

SMN1 Exon 7 Deletion Assay

(Multiplexed SCID and SMA)

SCREEN POSITIVEReferral for

Evaluation amp Diagnostic Testing

SCREEN NEGATIVENo Further

Action RequiredSMN2 dosage

ge1 copy SMN1 0 copies SMN1

Screening ndash SMN1 exon 7 deletion assay

Model for universal screeningWill use Ct cut-off ratherthan ΔΔCt to calculate SMN1 copy number

Probes5rsquo-VIC (SMN1)5rsquo-ABY (RPPH1)5rsquo-FAM (TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash MGB-NFQ

(SMN1 + TREC)3rsquo quencher ndash QSY

(RPPH1)

Purple haze standard

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 53

Universal SMA Screening ndash New York PlanMultiplex with SCID TREC assay

Carriersbull Not reported

Late onset SMAbull SMN2 copy numberbull When to treatbull How will detection impact the incidence of SMA

Non-deletion mutationsbull Will not be detected report language importantbull 2 ndash 5

Treatmentbull Long-term effects Renal toxicitybull Availability cost and compliancebull Insurance Coverage

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 54

Acknowledgement

Thank you to Denise Kay PhD for slides

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

July 12 2019 55

AcknowledgementsLaboratory

bull Michele Caggana ScD FACMGbull Colleen Stevens PhDbull Ritu Jain PhDbull Sandra Levin BSbull Patrick Wilson BSbull NYS Newborn Screening Program

Recruitment bull Jennifer Kraszewski MSbull Bianca Haser BSbull Veronica Ortiz MHSbull Anthony Albertorio BAbull Emilia Naranjobull Talia Weitzbull Katiana Rufinobull Jacqueline Gomez RNbull Angela Penabull Columbia Presbyterian Hospitals

Clinicalbull Wendy Chung MD PhDbull Carrie Koval MS CGCbull Julia Wynn MSbull Lilian Cohen MDbull Sarah Andrew BAbull Sally Dunaway Young PT DPTbull Nicole LaMarca DNP MSN

CPNPbull Darryl De Vivo MDbull Columbia University Medical

Center

Fundingbull Biogen Idec

Controlsbull Pediatric Neuromuscular

Research Clinic (PNRC)bull Biogen Idec

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

New England Newborn Screening Program

APHL SMA Webinar Series Part Two Overview of Available Screening Methods

Anne Marie Comeau PhDDeputy Director New England Newborn Screening ProgramProfessor of Pediatrics UMass Medical School

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Early Data from Massachusetts Newborn Screening

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

| |

The University of Massachusetts holds intellectual property that is used in

1 of 17pipeline therapies that are listed by Cure SMA

DISCLOSURE

New England Newborn Screening Program

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)bull Most common lethal autosomal recessive disorder in infants

bull Progressive muscle weakness resulting from degeneration of an anterior horn neurons

bull FDA-approved therapy

bull Recommended for RUSP by SACHDNC

bull Estimated Incidence 1 in 6000 to 20000

bull 1 in 40 people are heterozygote carriers

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Assay Development for SMA NBS

Francis K Lee and Kristina Mercer

Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lan Ji and Jennifer Navas

New England Newborn Screening ProgramUMMS

New England Newborn Screening Program

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Assay Development for SMA NBSTwo factors key to development

bull SMA is related to the absence of a fully functional gene that produces a Survival of Motor Neuron (SMN) protein SMN1

bull 95 SMA patients show homozygous loss of SMN1 exon 7

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

New England Newborn Screening Program

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Pre-characterized samples from Corielle n=7

Pre-characterized samples from CDC n= 2

Pre-characterized samples from Biogenn= 22 SMA patients n= 44 obligate carriers (parents)

100 pass

Validation

New England Newborn Screening Program

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

The Massachusetts SMA NBS WorkgroupRepresentatives from Newborn Screening Neurology Genetics

New England Newborn Screening Program

Mary Alice Abbott MD

Beverly N Hay MD

Basil Darras MD

Kathryn J Swoboda MD

Anne Marie Comeau PhD Jaime E Hale MS Inderneel Sahai MD Roger B Eaton PhD

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Number of Babies Screened for SMA

21341

As of 6262018

New England Newborn Screening Program

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Number of infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2

n = 29 (014)

n = 21312

Prompted Tier 2Normal NBS by Tier 1

New England Newborn Screening Program

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

New England Newborn Screening Program

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

WNL NBS - SMN1 Hybrid

WNL NBS

Positive NBS

72 prompting Tier 2 have been NICU specimens

False positive specimen apparently contained an inhibitor

New England Newborn Screening Program

Infants with a specimen prompting Tier 2 n = 29

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay

Katelyn Logerquist MLS(ASCP)CM

David E Jones PhDAndy Rohrwasser PhD

SMA WebinarJune 28 2018

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMATREC Assay Method

bull PCR-Based Triplex Assay (described by Dr Lee)ndash SMN1 ndash Deletion of exon 7 of SMN1 gene (SMA)ndash TREC ndash T-cell receptor excision circles (SCID)ndash RPP30 ndash Internal control

bull Extractionndash Automated ndash TECAN Freedom EVOndash PBSTween 20 washQiagen Solution 2 wash and elutionndash 96 well format to 384 well format

bull Real-Time PCRndash Roche LightCycler 480 IIndash 384 well block

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Extraction

1 32 mm punch2 Wash 1 80ul PBSTween 20 8 mins shaking

700rpm (RT Inheco) 3 Wash 2 80ul Qiagen Solution 2 8 mins RT shaking

700rpm4 Elution 140ul Qiagen solution 2 30 mins 70C

shaking 700rpm5 Transfer 35 ul into 384 well PCR volume 12 ul

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMATREC Assay Results

bull Normal Controlndash Pooled known normal specimens

bull Abnormal Controlndash Negative control

bull SMN1bull TREC

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN1

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

TREC

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Validation of SMATREC Assay

bull Reproducibility Studybull Limited Case Control Study (BLINDED)bull Population Analysis (5000 (SMA) 3000 (SCID))

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA AbnormalsPatient Origin SMN1 Cp RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 Biogen No Amp 2764 Abnormal SMA2 Biogen No Amp 2641 Abnormal SMA3 Biogen No Amp 2761 Abnormal SMA4 Biogen No Amp 2891 Abnormal SMA5 Biogen No Amp 2845 Abnormal SMA6 Biogen No Amp 2867 Abnormal SMA7 Biogen No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA8 Biogen No Amp 2967 Abnormal SMA9 Biogen No Amp 2791 Abnormal SMA

10 Biogen No Amp 2885 Abnormal SMA11 Biogen No Amp 2955 Abnormal SMA12 Biogen No Amp 2812 Abnormal SMA13 Biogen No Amp 2992 Abnormal SMA14 Biogen No Amp 2889 Abnormal SMA15 Biogen No Amp 2728 Abnormal SMA16 CDC No Amp 2614 Abnormal SMA17 CDC No Amp 2785 Abnormal SMA18 Utah No Amp 2859 Abnormal SMA19 Utah No Amp 2908 Abnormal SMA20 Utah No Amp 2864 Abnormal SMA21 Utah No Amp 2855 Abnormal SMA22 Utah No Amp 2941 Abnormal SMA23 Utah No Amp 2982 Abnormal SMA24 Utah 2558 2621 Normal Normal

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SCID AbnormalsPatient TREC Cp Z-Score RPP30 Cp LDT Determination Dx

1 No Amp No Amp 2897 Abnormal Classic SCID2 No Amp No Amp 2698 Abnormal Classic SCID3 No Amp No Amp 3034 Abnormal SCID ADA4 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal SCID ADA5 No Amp No Amp 2994 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome6 No Amp No Amp 3021 Abnormal DiGeorge Syndrome7 No Amp No Amp 3313 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia8 No Amp No Amp 3137 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia9 No Amp No Amp 2886 Abnormal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia

10 No Amp No Amp 2654 Abnormal Idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia asymptomatic11 No Amp No Amp 3058 Abnormal Variant T-cell lymphopenia12 No Amp No Amp 2716 Abnormal Microdeletion syndrome13 408 230 2935 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia14 4139 266 3161 Normal Secondary T-cell Lymphopenia15 3923 136 3071 Normal Normal

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN1 Population Analysis

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

TREC Population Analysis

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Z-Score

Individual measurement How many standard deviations below or above the population mean

Requires sufficiently large population study (knowledge of population mean and population standard deviation)

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

TREC Population Analysis

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Z-Score

Z-Score

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs

Analyte Mean plusmn SD 2 SD 99th Percentile 3SD 995th PercentileSMN1 2915 plusmn 135 3185 3291 3320 3381TREC 3698 plusmn 166 4031 4154 4197 4218

RPP30 2971 plusmn 139 3249 3299 3388 3414The cut-off for TREC is a Z-score of 28 (corresponds with a Cp asymp 4165)

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA Workflow

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Term SCID Workflow

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Premie SCID Workflow

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA Production Data

Category Old Method Count (n) New Method Count (n) Total (n)Total Screened 10989 5548 16537

Repeat First Screen 204 43 247Second Specimens Screened 12 9 21

Total Abnormal 1 + 1 0 1 + 1True SMA Case 1 0 1

Summary of patients screened from January 29 2018 ndash May 31 2018About 5 repeat requirement for first NBS

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Abnormal Case 1

bull Positive screen reportedbull Assessed in clinic no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing confirmed diagnosis of

SMA (0 SMN1 and 3 SMN2)bull Patient with family history and predicted SMA

Type 2 phenotype

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Abnormal Case 2

bull Internal decision to send for diagnostic testing (early testing stage) instead of resorting to repeat screenrecall specimen

bull Assessed in clinic with no symptoms presentbull Confirmatory testing showed 2 copies SMN1

and 1 copy SMN2 (confirmed in 2 independent laboratories)

bull SMN1 repeated on second NBS and was normal

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Summary

bull True cases show no amplification of SMN1bull In production assay works for SMN1 and TRECbull Concordant performance with EnLitebull 384 well format allows economies of scale bull Passed initial PT

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

96 to 384 conversion

Plate 1

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN1 Reproducibility

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

TREC Reproducibility

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

RPP30 Reproducibility

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Reproducibility

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA

Mei Baker MD FACMG

Co-Director Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLHWynne Mateffy Professor Department of Pediatrics

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

APHL webinar series on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

June 28 2018

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA Types and Clinical Classification

SMA Type Age of Onset Motor Ability Life Expectancy SMN2 Copy

Number

SMA Type I lt 6 months Cannot sit lt 2years 2 copies

SMA Type II lt 18 monthsSit independently

cannot standBreathing difficulty

2nd - 3rd decade 3-4 copies

SMA Type III gt 18 months Stand and walk independently Normal life expectancy 3-4 copies

SMA Type IVAdolescent

or adult onset

Retain walking muscle pain Normal life expectancy 4-8 copies

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA Type and SMN2 Copies

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Calucho et al Neuromuscular Disorders (2018)

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

M Butchbach et al Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (2016)

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Real-time PCR Assay

Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Exon 7SMN1

LNA probe specific for SMN1 target

Exon 7SMN2

LNA probe specific for SMN2 target

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples

IDSMN2 Copy Numbers

Clinical Diagnosis Provided Real-time

PCR AssayDroplet Digital

PCR Assay

WI SMA 1 SMA Type II 3 4 3

WI SMA 2 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 3 SMA Type II 4 4 3

WI SMA 4 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 5 SMA Type I Not Provided 2 2

WI SMA 6 SMA Type I 2 2 2

WI SMA 7 SMA Type II Not Provided

gt4 3

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

NBS Specimens

SMN1 Zero

SMN2 Copy

Numbers

RT-PCR ddPCR

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Confirmed SMN1 zero amp SMN 2

copy

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

SMN2 1-3

copies

Follow clinically every 6-12

months

No

Symptoms

Yes

Discuss treatment

options (nusinersen clinical trial)

Symptoms

YesSMN2

4 or more copies

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

SMA Screening Assay Summary

It is technically feasible to incorporate SMA screening test into the current ongoing SCID screening test

MULTIPLEX

It is feasible to avoid SMA carrier identification by only detecting ldquoSMN1 ZEROrdquo

Screening sensitivity of the proposed method is about 95

It is beneficial to include SMN2 copy number assessment in NBS for SMA protocol

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

AcknowledgmentsMeredith Schultz MD

Dept of Neurology UWSMPHMatthew Harmelink MD

Dept of Neurology CHWAudrey Tluczek PhD RN

School of Nursing UWSMPHAnita Laxova

Dept of Pediatrics UWSMPH

Sean Mochal BSMandie Loehe BSBethany Zeitler BS

Newborn Screening Laboratory at WSLH

WISCONSIN STATE LABORATORY OF HYGIENE - UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Questions

bull Please press 7 to unmute or type your question in the chat box

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

Archived Webinar Series

The SMA webinar series has been archived and recorded It will be posted on APHLorg within the next week

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits

Analysis Answers Action wwwaphlorg

PACE Continuing Education Credits

bull To receive 15 PACE continuing education credits for attending this webinar you must complete the post webinar evaluation which will appear in the post webinar pop-up window and follow-up email If you have any questions please contact Funke Akinsola oluwafunkeakinsolaaphlorg 2404852714

  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy Overview of Available Screening Methods
  • Slide Number 2
  • Agenda
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Real-time PCR emerges as the preferred method in newborn screening for SMA
  • Slide Number 10
  • What are the challenges in designing a real-time PCR assay to screen for SMA
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • LNA probe was redesigned for maximum specificity
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Acknowledgement
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • DISCLOSURE
  • Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Assay Development for SMA NBS
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Implementation of SMATREC LDT Assay
  • SMATREC Assay Method
  • Extraction
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • SMATREC Assay Results
  • SMN1
  • TREC
  • Validation of SMATREC Assay
  • SMA Abnormals
  • SCID Abnormals
  • SMN1 Population Analysis
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • Z-Score
  • TREC Population Analysis
  • SMATREC Assay Cut-Offs
  • SMA Workflow
  • Term SCID Workflow
  • Premie SCID Workflow
  • SMA Production Data
  • Abnormal Case 1
  • Abnormal Case 2
  • Summary
  • 96 to 384 conversion
  • SMN1 Reproducibility
  • TREC Reproducibility
  • RPP30 Reproducibility
  • Reproducibility
  • SMN2 Copy number Assessment in NBS for SMA
  • SMA Types and Clinical Classification
  • SMA Type and SMN2 Copies
  • SMN1 and SMN2 in SMA
  • Real-time PCR Assay Targeting Single Base Variant in Exon 7
  • SMN2 Copy Number Assessment by Droplet Digital PCR
  • SMN2 Copy Numbers in SMN1 Zero Samples
  • Wisconsin SMA Screening Protocol
  • Wisconsin SMA Follow-up Protocol
  • SMA Screening Assay Summary
  • Acknowledgments
  • Questions
  • Archived Webinar Series
  • PACE Continuing Education Credits