Upload
arthur-wynne-foot
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPECIMENS FROM A CASE OF BRIGHT'SDISEASE.
BY ARTHUR WYNNE FOOT, M.D., F.K.Q.C.P.;Physician Meath Hospital; Professor of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons
[Read in the Pathological Section, December 4, 1885.]
THE specimens which it is my privilege to lay before the Patho-
logical Section illustrated in a typical manner sonate of the patho-
logical events in Bright's disease.
The specimens are a pair of granular kidneys, symmetrically
diseased, an hypertrophied heart, and the occurrence of pericardial
inflammation as the terminal accident in the downward series of
changes.
The kidneys are obviously of the kind described by Richard
Bright as granulated; their surface is mottled by being broken
into minute areas of a pale colour surrounded by more pinkish
because more vascular—tissue; they are contracted in all their
measurements ; weigh -together, free from their adipo-cellular
envelope, six ounces; are firm, tough, and, on the whole, brownish-
red in colour; in fact, they are in the recent state, just as
represented in the excellent drawing done, while they were fresh,
underm y superintendence.
The heart weighs thirty-two ounces. The hypertrophy chiefly
concerns, and is most conspicuous in, the left ventricle. There
is neither valvular disease nor atheromatous change in the aorta
beyond a trifling degree, so that the enlargement may fairly be
assumed to have been due to increased capillary resistance. The
evidence of recent pericarditis is plain to be seen on the surface of
the heart in the deposition of a sheet of reticulated exudation. The
fluid parts of the exudation have escaped in the opening of the
sac. There are two points of clinical interest about the casewhich are deserving of notice. This man, who may be stated to
U
306 Specimens from a Case of Br ght's Disease.
have been fifty years of age, and by employment a steam-raiser-
i.e., a man who has to have the fires lighted and steam up for
the drivers of locomotives—was admitted to hospital for haema-
temesis, which had been of daily occurrence for three weeks. The
quantity of blood daily discharged from the stomach, while he was
under observation, varied from three to fifteen ounces. A history
of intemperate habits had, somehow or other, accompanied him
into hospital ; and the hwmorrhage was regarded as due to hepatic
causes. However, examination of the liver, stomach, or spleen,
afforded no explanation of its occurrence. He had no dropsy or
oedema, and made no complaint of defective vision. His colour
was pallid, but not more so than would be accounted for by such a
loss of blood as he had been subject to. His urine was examined
for the purpose of ascertaining if it would present the characters
called 11 hepatic," and was discovered to be albuminous. The
ha matemesis having subsided in four or five days under the use of
ice and ergot of rye, he was moved to another part of the hospital,
and, in his transference, seems to have caught cold, because the
day after his removal he complained of pains across the upper part of
front of the chest, which led me to examine that region for aneurysm,
on the possibility of such a disease existing and leaking into the
oesophagus. Two days after he complained of pain in the left infra-
mammary region, and on auscultation over the seat of pain I
heard nothing to suggest inflammatory action in the pericardium.
After twenty-four hours of great restlessness from this date he
expired quietly. At the autopsy at least eight ounces of turbid
serum, occupied with flakes of lymph, was found in the cavity of
the pericardium. The peritoneal and pleural cavities were free
from effusion, as was the subcutaneous cellular tissue—the pleuroo
were more or less agglutinated by recent adhesions, dry, fleecy, and
easily detached. The liver was smooth, and natural in shape,
colour, and consistence. The stomach was examined with some
care as the seat of the bleeding, for which he had been admitted.
Its contents had no appearance of blood—some of the rug ut on its
posterior wall presented an arborescent vascularity, but there was
no obvious breach of surface. This case had an interesting clinical
By DR. A. W. FooT. 307
feature in the fact that the primary—in fact the principal and only-
1,aemorrhage was from the mucous membrane of the stomach. If
called upon for an explanation of this, I can only say that it must
have been the locus minoris resistentice, or offer the usual explanations
for the ha morrhagic attacks in contracted kidney—viz., friability
of arteries, increase of arterial tension, and deficient coagulability
of the blood. Why, in one case, the haemorrhage should be an
epistaxis ; in another, a heematemesis ; and, in a third, should take
place from the female sexual organs (as West has pointed out) ;
why, again, it should be sometimes retinal, sometimes intracranial,
is difficult to explain, and I make no attempt to do so. The
complete absence of dropsy in this case appears to have been due
to the powerful action of the hypertrophied heart.
Pericarditis is the especial characteristic of the granulated
kidney, and furnishes one of the most frequent means by which
the fatal result is accomplished. It is induced by the most trivial
exciting causes, lasts but a short time, and is almost invariably
fatal. The first of Richard Bright's cases, and that which furnishes
perhaps his best drawing of the granulated kidney, died with peri-
carditis. It has been calculated (Tyson) that pericarditis occurs in
twenty-five per cent. of cases of granular kidney. The non-discovery
of pericarditis, when my attention was drawn to the region by the
complaint of pain, the day before his death, I can only explain on
the supposition that the effusion was sufficient to intervene between
the opposite surfaces; the lymph was also of a soft and buttery
consistence, such as is recognised as not productive of loud friction.
Theoretically it might be assumed that the murmur produced by a
hypertrophied heart in pericarditis should be both loud and exten-
sively diffused. I have met with cases where this expectation has
not been borne out by facts. These specimens are such common
results of granular kidneys, that I was at first unwilling to occupy
the time of the Section with their exhibition otherwise than by card,
and feel called upon to apologise for offering such trite subjects to
the consideration of the members of the Section.