31
Joe Gregory, Lucy Berthoud, Theo Tryfonas University of Bristol, UK Ludovic Faure, Antonio Prezzavento Airbus, UK ESA MBSE Workshop 28 th September 2020 Applying the ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’ to the Biomass Mission

‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Joe Gregory, Lucy Berthoud, Theo Tryfonas University of Bristol, UK

Ludovic Faure, Antonio Prezzavento Airbus, UK

ESA MBSE Workshop

28th September 2020

Applying the

‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

to the Biomass Mission

Page 2: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

2

Contents1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 3: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

3

1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 4: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Images courtesy of European Space Agency (ESA) 4

Airbus Space MBSE Projects

• ExoMars Rover

• Stevenage, UK

• Communication of

requirements

• JUICE

• Toulouse, France

• Science data allocation

eDeorbit is the largest effort so far – methodology and model template developed

• eDeorbit

• Bremen, Germany

• Autonomous fail-safe

reaction

Page 5: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

5

Topics of interest:

• Early Functional Validation (ConOps)

• Template Model Framework

Airbus Space Interviews

Response Themes:

• Process

• Organisation

• Tools

49%

26%

25%

Response Categories

Process Organisation Tools

Questions:

• Where are the issues with Systems Engineering?

• Where might models help?

Page 6: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

6

Airbus Interviews Publication

DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.110453

J. Gregory, L. Berthoud, T. Tryfonas, A. Rossignol, and L. Faure, “The long and winding road: MBSE adoption for functional avionics of spacecraft,” Journal of

Systems and Software, vol. 160 (110453), 2019.

Page 7: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

7

Biomass – Mass Memory Sizing

Page 8: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

8

1. Simulation Demo:

We demonstrated possibility

of model execution

2. Memory allocation:

We showed that the

requirement was met

3. Optimise directory sizes:

We proposed a suitable

directory division

Biomass – Mass Memory Sizing

Page 9: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass – Mass Memory Sizing

9

DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2019.8741767

J. Gregory, L. Berthoud, T. Tryfonas, and A. Prezzavento, “Early Validation of the Data Handling Unit of a Spacecraft Using MBSE,” in IEEE Aerospace Conference,

Big Sky, MT, 2019.

Page 10: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

How flexible / adaptable is the model to:

1. Changes to the requirements?

2. Changes to the functional behaviour?

3. Change to the logical architecture?

4. Contingency Analysis

5. Mission Updated

Biomass – Mass Memory Sizing

The model introduces flexibility into the

system definition.

But work is needed to streamline the process

10

Page 11: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

11

DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.295875

J. Gregory, L. Berthoud, T. Tryfonas, A. Prezzavento, and L. Faure, “Investigating the Flexibility of the MBSE Approach to the Biomass Mission,” IEEE Transactions

on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2019.

Biomass – Mass Memory Sizing

Page 12: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

12

1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 13: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

• Develop a template (the SEAM) to be used for early functional definition and analysis of spacecraft.

• Demonstrate the flexibility of the SEAM by applying it to real space-based missions.

13

49%

26%

25%

Response Categories

Process Organisation Tools

Spacecraft Early Analysis Model -Objectives

Page 14: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Mission

SystemOperations

Mode requestsFunction requests

TelemetryDecision criteria

Current phaseComms windows Phase transition External entities

Comms windows

Phase transition

Spacecraft Early Analysis Model -Separation between M, O, S

Page 15: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Operational

Phases

Functional Architecture

(Sub)system Modes, Functions

Logical Architecture

Equipment States

Cameo Systems Modeler

Simulation

(Bridge)

(Calculations)

External Entities:

Environment, Mission Entities

Mission

Profile

15

Mission Operations System

External Entities:

Ground

Key

Spacecraft Early Analysis Model -Structure

Page 16: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Spacecraft Early Analysis Model – Interim Report

16

J. Gregory, L. Berthoud, T. Tryfonas, and L. Faure, “There’s no ‘I’ in ‘SEAM’: An Interim Report on the ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’”, in IEEE Aerospace

Conference, Big Sky, MT, 2020.

Page 17: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

17

1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 18: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass Model – Logical Architecture

Page 19: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass Model – Functional Definition

Page 20: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass Model – Functional Definition

Page 21: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass Model - Operations

Page 22: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Biomass Model – Results

Page 23: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

v3: Case Study 2 – Biomass Model – Results

Page 24: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

24

1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 25: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

ExoMars Model - STK

Page 26: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

ExoMars Model - Results

Page 27: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

ExoMars Model - Results

Page 28: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

28

1. Previous Work

2. Spacecraft Early Analysis Model

3. Biomass – Payload Deployment

4. ExoMars – Egress from Lander

5. Summary

Page 29: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Separation between Descriptive and Analytical aspects of the model is crucial

Separation between Mission, Operations and Systemintroduces flexibility in definition and analysis

– does not prescribe system behaviour

Application to multiple missions and use cases can demonstrate flexibility

Lessons Learned

Page 30: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

Interviews within Airbus indicated:

we should focus on ‘Early Functional Validation’ against ‘Concept of Operations’

we should develop a ‘Model Template’

MBSE techniques have been applied to three case studies:

1. Biomass, Mass Memory Sizing (previous work)

2. Biomass, Payload Deployment Sequence

3. ExoMars, Egress from Lander Sequence

A model-based framework, the ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’ has been developed

This links CSM, MATLAB, Excel, STK to define and simulate system behaviour

Development of the SEAM Guide and SEAM Ontology is ongoing

Summary

Page 31: ‘Spacecraft Early Analysis Model’

31

Thank you for listening

Questions / Feedbackgratefully received!

[email protected]