Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
1Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation1
Technical Consultation on Knowledge Sharing and Networkingfor Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Donation and
Transplantation in the Western Pacific Region
Seoul, February 20-21 2014
2Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Network
Partnerships, Collaborations and Global Consultations Process
Partnerships, Collaborations and Global Consultations Process
Health authorities
• National Transplantation Agencies
• National Regulatory Authority
• Policy makers
Scientific and Professional Societies
• Official relation with TTS, WBMT,
ICCBBA
Experts Ethicists, lawyers
• Patients- Donors and Recipents
• Civil society
Every Region of the Globe and level of
development
20042004
Towards a Common Global Attitude to Transplantation
3Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and InnovationData source: Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation; map courtesy of S White
Territory size is distorted in proportion to the number of organ transplants reported for each country in 2010
<6
6 to <20
20 to <40
Transplantation rate (pmp)
40 to <70
>70
Global distribution of transplantation activity
2010
4Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Hepatitis C prevalence, 2005 Source: Hanafiah K et al. Hepatology 2013Estimates are derived from a meta-
analysis of data from 232 studies published between 1997 and 2007.
Low: <1.5%
Moderate: 1.5-3.5%
High: >3.5%
Hepatitis B prevalence (adult), 2005
Source: Ott J et al. Vaccine 2012Estimates are derived from a
meta-analysis of data from 396 studies published between 1980
and 2007.
Low <2%
Low intermediate: 2-4%
High intermediate: 5-7%
High: >=8%
Viral Hepatitis B and C are Prevalent in AsiaViral Hepatitis B and C are Prevalent in Asia
5Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Country Population
(million)
% of world
population
Dialysis
patients
(thousands)
% of world
dialysis
patients
Prevalence
of dialysis
(pmp)
USA 313 4% 420 19% 1,340
Japan 127 2% 302 14% 2,370
China 1,340 19% 200 9% 150
Brazil 205 3% 106 5% 520
Germany 81 1% 83 4% 1,020
Rep. Korea 50 <1% 46 2% 910
Thailand 70 <1% 41 2% 590
Malaysia 29 <1% 24 1% 834
Global 6,963 2,164 310
Source: ESRD patients in 2011: a global perspective. Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, 2011
http://www.vision-fmc.com/files/download/ESRD/ESRD_Patients_in_2011.pdf
Over 2 million patients were being treated with dialysis in 2011.
Nearly one quarter of this global dialysis population were beingtreated in Japan and China alone.
The need for Kidney Transplantation in Asia The need for Kidney Transplantation in Asia
6Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Mya
nm
ar
Gh
an
aB
an
gla
de
sh
Nig
eria
Kyrg
yzsta
nL
ibya
Ken
ya
Rep
of M
old
ova
Alb
an
iaM
ala
ysia
Bulg
aria
Nic
ara
gu
aIn
do
ne
sia
UA
EU
krain
eL
eb
an
on
Arm
en
iaN
ep
al
Alg
eria
Ge
org
iaIn
dia
Philip
pin
es
Chin
aM
on
go
liaD
om
Rep
ub
licS
ud
an
Qa
tar
Pakis
tan
Azerb
aija
nP
eru
Ta
jikis
tan
Gu
ate
mala
Om
an
Sou
thA
frica
Russia
Th
aila
nd
El S
alv
ad
or
Para
gu
ay
Boliv
iaE
cua
do
rR
om
an
iaS
ing
ap
ore
Kaza
kh
sta
nM
au
ritius
Ven
ezu
ela
Tu
nis
iaC
ub
aS
yria
Ja
pa
nT
FY
RM
Sri L
anka
Gre
ece
Chile
Colo
mb
iaP
an
am
aE
gyp
tIc
ela
nd
Bela
rus
Sau
di A
rab
iaM
alta
Isra
el
Me
xic
oN
ew
Ze
ala
nd
Kuw
ait
Slo
va
kia
Cyp
rus
Lith
uan
iaB
razil
Hun
ga
ryC
osta
Ric
aA
rge
ntin
aU
rug
ua
yJo
rda
nIta
lyP
ola
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Ge
rma
ny
La
tvia
Iran
Sw
itze
rland
Irela
nd
Rep
of K
ore
aA
ustra
liaF
inla
nd
Can
ad
aD
en
ma
rkT
urk
ey
Portu
ga
lC
zech
Re
pS
we
de
nE
sto
nia
UK
Fra
nce
Belg
ium
Austria
Cro
atia
Spa
inU
SN
eth
erla
nd
sN
orw
ay
Kidney tx from DD (pmp)
Living Kidney tx (pmp)
Kidney Transplants per Country
and Per million population (pmp)
Kidney Transplants per Country
and Per million population (pmp)
2
7Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
0
25
50
75
100
Rate
(p
mp
)
Source: Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (www.transplant-observatory.org)
Council of Europe, Newsletter Transplant, 2012, Madrid, Spain.
Patients newly included on the waiting list for a kidney transplant in 2011, pmp
Kidney transplant rate in 2011, pmp
Waiting List Additions Versus Kidney Transplants Performed In
2011: High-income Countries
Waiting List Additions Versus Kidney Transplants Performed In
2011: High-income Countries
8Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
The goal is not to find an ever-
increasing supply of organs for
transplantation, but rather to
engage with transplantation in
the context of a broader public
health strategy for prevention of
chronic organ failure.
Sourc
e: U
nited S
tate
s R
enal D
ata
Syste
m, A
nnual R
eport
2012
Unadjusted End Stage Kidney Disease Incidence
In Selected Countries Worldwide
Unadjusted End Stage Kidney Disease Incidence
In Selected Countries Worldwide
9Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Source: United States Renal Data System, Annual Report 2012 United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Increased prevalence of diabetes
and of treated ESKD with a primary diagnosis of diabetes
0
2
4
6
0
200
400
600
198
01
98
21
98
41
98
61
98
81
99
01
99
21
99
41
99
61
99
82
00
02
00
22
00
42
00
62
00
82
01
0
Pre
va
len
ce
of d
iab
ete
s (%
)
DM
-ES
RD
ra
te (
pm
p)
Prevalence of diabetic ESRD (per million population)
Crude population prevalence of diabetes (%)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
198
01
98
21
98
41
98
61
98
81
99
01
99
21
99
41
99
61
99
82
00
02
00
22
00
42
00
62
00
82
01
0
DM
-ES
RD
rate
(pm
p)
Incidence of ESRD among the diabetic population
However, incidence of Diabetes ESKD among the diabetic population has declined due to improved secondary prevention.
Diabetes and ESKD in the USADiabetes and ESKD in the USA
10Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
The United States, Europe and Australia are
starting to observe a decline in the rate of new
patients starting renal replacement therapy.
In contrast, growth in dialysis populations has
shifted to Asia, Latin America, the Middle East
and Africa.
Prevention appears to be having an impact
Secondary
… Primary
Prevention is Crucial for Self Sufficiency in
Kidney Transplantation
Prevention is Crucial for Self Sufficiency in
Kidney Transplantation
11Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
Meeting the needs of
patients from a given
population with an
adequate provision of
transplantation services
and supply of organs
from that population
12Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
3
13Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Third Global Consultation on Organ Donation and Transplantation, Madrid March 23-25, 2010
The Self-Sufficiency Paradigm Third Global Consultation on Organ Donation and Transplantation, Madrid March 23-25, 2010
The Self-Sufficiency Paradigm
Society / Authority
Donation is a civic gesture, an expectation but not an exception
PRINCIPLES
To meet patients' needs:
1. Government responsibility
• Organization
2. Equity
• In the burden of donation
• In allocation (UHC) WHA63.22
3. Education
• To donation
• To prevention
4. Trust of the Public
• Transparency
• Professionalism
ORGAN
Donation and Transplantation
1. Legal framework
2. National Health Plan includes
donation and transplantation
3. Organ donation possible in as
many circumstances of death as
possible => ORGANISATION
4. Comprehensive management of
chronic kidney disease
5. Health and death in school
curriculum
6. Media associated to donation
and transplantation system
SolidarityReciprocity
14Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
The Self Sufficiency Paradigm
Education Donation and Prevention The Self Sufficiency Paradigm
Education Donation and Prevention
Unprecedented measures• School curricula
o From the end of primary school
� Children
� Parents
o Health education
o Education to donation
� During life
� After death
• Media
• Health professionals
Solidarity Reciprocity
15Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304149404579322560004817176?mod=WSJ_hpp
_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsFifth&mobile=y January 2014
Our conclusion is that a very large number of both live
and cadaveric kidney donations would be available by
paying about $15,000 for each kidney. That estimate isn't
exact, and the true cost could be as high as $25,000 or as
low as $5,000—but even the high estimate wouldn't
increase the total cost of kidney transplants by a large
percentage.
16Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
WHO Organization-wide Initiative for
Medical Products of Human Origin
« Health products of an exceptional nature* »
* GUIDING PRINCIPLE 10
WHO Guiding Principles On Human Cell, Tissue And Organ Transplantation
Endorsed by the sixty-third World Health Assembly in Resolution WHA 63.22
17Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
Medical Products of Human Origin (MPHO) Medical Products of Human Origin (MPHO)
Materials derived from the human body for clinicalapplication.
Despite the obvious differences in types of human biological materials used to create MPHO, and the range of therapeutic uses which they may serve, all MPHO
have in common an origin and destination in the human body.
.
18Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
Medical Products of Human Origin (MPHO)Medical Products of Human Origin (MPHO)
Recruitment
Selection
TestingProcessing
Allocation
Issuing
Clinical
application
Follow-upProcurementFollow-up
Blood and blood products
Cells TissuesOrgans
Gametes and EmbryosSecretions and excretions…
Plasma Derived Medicinal Products
Advanced Therapies….. Personalized medicine
Ethics – Safety & Quality – Access
4
19Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
Recognizing Humanity in
Medical Productsof Human Origin
20Health Systems
Policies and Workforce
Health Systems
and InnovationClinical
Procedures
Medical Products of Human Origin - MPHOEthics – Quality & Safety - Access
Medical Products of Human Origin - MPHOEthics – Quality & Safety - Access
AdvancedTherapies
Cells
ARTGametes
Plasma Derived
Medicines
Other Human Derived
Medicines
Life saving
Universal ShortageNo alternative Best survival /costs
Hematopoietic stem cell
Human derived pharmaceuticals
Blood & Components
Misuse in HIC/MIC
Access in LMIC
Donation
after death
Tissues
Organs
Life enhancement
Research & Evidence
Stem cell - TEMP
21Health Systems
Policies and Workforce
Health Systems
and InnovationClinical
Procedures
The Human Body as the Source of Therapeutics:
Towards a Global Consensus
The Human Body as the Source of Therapeutics:
Towards a Global Consensus
The establishment of globally agreed principles for the governance of
MPHO would represent significant progress towards the goal of
meeting minimum standards, as well as serving:
• to underline the cross cutting concerns regarding all MPHO,
inherent to their human origin;
• to demonstrate respect for the human body and hence the dignity
of persons;
• To increase safety and enhance ethical practices;
• To encourage donation by generating trust in procedural
safeguards such as consent requirements and protocols for care
and follow-up of donors;
• To avoid distortions in practices due to the undermining effect of
bad examples, such as the justification of payment for organs by
appeal to legal trade in plasma.
22Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
£$ €
¥£$
€¥
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Gametes Embryos
Blood
Plasma
SecretionsExcretions
Societal ValuesProtection of the DonorSafety of the Recipient
Self-Sufficiency Public Health
Organ Tissues
The Human Body and its Parts as Such
Not the Source of Financial Gain
The Human Body and its Parts as Such
Not the Source of Financial Gain
Stem CellsAdvanced Therapies
HumanDerived Drugs
23Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
1. Principles inherent to the Human Origin
• Non commercial nature of the human body and its parts as such
• Towards a global consensus leading to a formal agreement
2. Universal use of ISBT 128 for all MPHO
• Information Standards for Blood and Transplant
• Towards universal use of ISBT128 within 10 years
3. Global vigilance and surveillance
• NOTIFY project for Vigilance and Surveillance of MPHO
• Using at best the global experience of adverse incidents
World Health Assembly UN
Towards a binding international legal instrument
The WHO Wide Initiative for MPHOApril 2013 - Programmed Budget 2014-2015
The WHO Wide Initiative for MPHOApril 2013 - Programmed Budget 2014-2015
3 Global Governance Tools for MPHO
24Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
-1- Items for Standards of Practice for MPHO-1- Items for Standards of Practice for MPHO
� Responsibility for the provision of
MPHO placed with authorities and through them the individual citizen and resident;
� Equity as a goal, in the burden of
donation and in allocation of MPHO;
� Prohibition of financial gain on the human body and its parts as such and where profit is not forbidden,
guarantee of transparency;
� Genuine consent of donors and recipients and protection of the incompetent;
� Use of MPHO justified by evidence and
absence of comparable alternative;
� Duty to constantly optimize the safety,
quality and efficacy of procurement, process and clinical application of MPHO;
� Traceability and accountability
mandated throughout the process, from donors to recipients, including long term outcomes and vigilance and
surveillance under the oversight of competent authorities;
� Transparency and openness to scrutiny indispensable while confidentiality and
anonymity when required must be
preserved.
5
25Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
“Transparency — especially when things go
wrong — is increasingly considered
necessary to improving the quality of health
care. By being candid with both patients and
clinicians, health care organizations can
promote their leaders' accountability for safer
systems, better engage clinicians in
improvement efforts, and engender greater
patient trust. “ Allen Kachalia
TransparencyTransparency
Role of Scientific and Professional Societies ?
Activities and practices
26Service Delivery
and Safety
Health Systems
and Innovation
The WHO-Wide Initiative for MPHOsThe WHO-Wide Initiative for MPHOs
Towards an overarching level of requirement specific to MPHOs
EB 134
• Review of the implementation of resolutions WHA63.12 and
WHA63.22 on transfusion and transplantation
WHA67
• Side event on MPHOs
• Review of the implementation of resolutions WHA63.12 and
WHA63.22
• Request to WHO for a report on overarching issues associated to the
human origin of therapeutics
Regional and Global consultation process
WHA68/69 Resolution on MPHOs
Global Standards for MPHOs
Health SystemsPolicies and Workforce
Health Systems and Services27
ClinicalProcedures
Thank you
[email protected]@who.int
03/02/2015
1
Service Delivery and Safety2
Service Delivery and Safety4
Kidney Liver Heart Lung Pancreas
77818 23986 5935 4359 2423
2012 GKT/ GODT
Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation
Organs Transplanted Globally in 2012Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation
Organs Transplanted Globally in 2012
≈ 114,690 organs transplanted(≈ 10% of estimated global needs)
≈ 1.81 % increase over 2011
109 countries reported to the Global Observatory on Organ Donation and Transplantation
South Africa, India and China - are 2010 estimates
Service Delivery and Safety5
but only 2-3 % of world’s deceased donors
03/02/2015
2
Service Delivery and Safety7
• 1.9 million tissue grafts distributed by AATB accredited tissue
banks each year
• > 100,000 tissues imported into Korea in one year
• > 200,000 tissues grafts a year in Germany
• 5,000 cornea transplants in Italy each year
• 46,000 corneas distributed by Sri Lanka Eye Bank over 30
years
Service Delivery and Safety9
HSCTHSCT
Service Delivery and Safety10
37 %
37 %
11 %
14 % 1%
North America Europe Asia South America Others
Service Delivery and Safety11
37 %
37 %
14 % 1%
North America Europe Asia South America Others
11 %
Service Delivery and Safety12
03/02/2015
3
Service Delivery and Safety13
Service Delivery and Safety15
Service Delivery and Safety16
Solidarity
EquityRespects for Dignity
Loss of Dignity
Market, inequity….Exploitation
Transplantation Progresses on a unsteady scale
Service Delivery and Safety17
GP 2 Death
No conflict
GP 3Maximizing DD
GP 1Consent DD
GP 4 Protecting the
incompetent
GP 9 Equitable allocation
Protecting LD
GP 6 Promoting
No advertising
GP 7 Reasonability
For transplant origin
GP 8 Justifiable fees
GP 5 Free donation and no purchase of human transplant as such,
but cost &expenditures recoveryt
GP 10 Monitoring long term outcomes. Quality and safety of procedures and products
GP 11 Transparency, openness to scrutiny, anonymity
Service Delivery and Safety18
GP 2 Death
No conflict
GP 1Consent DD
GP 3Maximizing DD
03/02/2015
4
� Guidance on criteria for the determination of death
• WHO team
• 8-10 experts (neurologist, intensivist, cardiologist etc)
Service Delivery and Safety20
� Guidance on criteria for the determination of death
� Increase global visibility of the “GODT”
•value transplantation and increase the motivation to donate among people
•Better know the countries’/regions’ situation to develop the appropriate
policies to increase donation rates.
� Guidance on criteria for the determination of death
� Increase global visibility of the “GODT”
� Vigilance and surveillance
Service Delivery and Safety23
14-16 November 2012, Rome
Service Delivery and Safety24
Formulated the idea of language specific web
interfaces that would help non-English speakers to
benefit from the NOTIFY project and conversely
would help the NOTIFY project by allowing the
input of cases initially not published in English.
03/02/2015
5
Service Delivery and Safety25
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
478
125 127 206 226 284392
1215
Millions inhabitans
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
478
125 127 206 226 284392
1215
Millions inhabitans
Service Delivery and Safety26
Service Delivery and Safety27
Service Delivery and Safety28
� Search for relevant cases in their own language
� Translated into English
� Send it to the NL editorial group
� Upload
Service Delivery and Safety29
� Search for relevant cases NL
� Translated into their own language
� Disseminate to professionals
� Guidance on criteria for the determination of death
� Increase global visibility of the “GODT”
� Vigilance and surveillance
� Emerging areas: Xenotransplantation
Regenerative Medicine
03/02/2015
6
• To strengthen wider collaboration among members
and with other societies for enhancement of research
activities
• To review the current status of xenotransplantation
science and practice
• To encourage transparency in xenotransplantation
related activities
� Guidance on criteria for the determination of death
� Increase global visibility of the “GODT”
� Vigilance and surveillance
� Emerging areas: Xenotransplantation
Regenerative Medicine
� Strengthening Global Network
� Promote close collaboration with Health Authorities,
Scientific and Professional Societies in charge of national
policies.
� Establish a structured regional working group in WPRO for
transplantation in light of the European and Latin-
American experience
Service Delivery and Safety34
Service Delivery and Safety35
Service Delivery and Safety36
03/02/2015
7
37Service Delivery
Strengthening
Health Systems
and Innovation
Thank you
http://www.who.int/transplantation/en/
03/02/2015
1
Essential legal and organizational requirements for
national cell, tissue and organ transplantation services
Jeremy Chapman
Sydney
Living
Donor
Transplantation
Surgical Team
Post Tx Care
HLA Lab
Drug program
Data
Systems
Acute
Dialysis
Capacity
Funding
Mechanisms
Legislative
and
Regulatory
Framework
Deceased
Donor
Transplantation
On Call Team
Post Tx Care
HLA Lab
Drug program
Data
Systems
Chronic
Dialysis
Program
Waiting List
and
Allocation
Funding
Mechanisms
ICU/Brain
Death
Organ/Tissue
Procurement
/Banking
program
Legislative
and
Regulatory
Framework
Deceased
Donor
Transplantation
Deceased Donor Living Donor
Diagnosis of death Donor Assessment
Surgical retrieval
Organ Allocation
Surgical retrieval
Recipient(s)
Crossmatch
Transplant
Donor medical risk
assessment
Transplant
follow up
One National Waiting list
Transplant facility
National Allocation
Protocol
National Transplant
Registry
Medical Protocol
Ministry regulation
Key:
KIDNEY
03/02/2015
2
Donor
GP 2 Death ∆γ
No conflict
GP 3Maximizing
DDProtecting LD
GP 4Protecting theincompetent
GP 6Promoting
No advertising
GP 7Responsibility
for transplant origin
GP 8Justifiable fees
GP 1 Consent DD
GP 9Equitable allocation
Recipient Process
GP 5 Free donation and no purchase of human transplant as such, but cost & expenditures recovery
GP 10 Monitoring long term outcomes. Quality and safety of procedures and products
GP 11 Transparency, openness to scrutiny, anonymity
20102010WHO Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue
and Organ Transplantation
World Health Assembly - 22 May 2010
9Essential Health Technologies
Health Systems and Services
•CKD
•CLD
•CARDIAC
•RESPIRATORY
•DIABETES
•OTHERNATIONAL
ACCOUNTABILITIES
CAPACITY CONTROL
REGULATORY CONTROL
ETHICAL CONTEXT
RESPONSIBILITIES
OPPORTUNITIES
FOR CARE
•EDUCATION
•VACCINATION
•SCREENING
•PREVENTION
•BRIDGING Rx
•DONATION
•TRANSPLANT
•RESEARCH
CAPACITIES
•LEGISLATION
•DATA REGISTRIES
•HEALTHCARE
FACILITIES
•HUMAN RESOURCES
•REGIONAL
COOPERATION
•CULTURAL &
RELIGIOUS
ENVIRONMENT
•FUNDING
CAPACITIES
ACHIEVEMENTSSUFFICIENCY
The Madrid Resolution
Human Organ Cell & Tissue
Legislation and regulations
Ownership and Gift
laws
Therapeutic goods laws regulations
Private Health care
laws regulations
Customs and excise
laws regulations
Consent framework
Definition of nationality
The context in Law for Organ, Tissue and Cell
Transplantation
Critical issues in determining the basis of legislation
On Human Organ, Tissue and Cell Transplantation
• Compatibility with the WHO Guiding
Principles and Declaration of Istanbul
• The extent of inclusion of all medical
products of human origin
• Basis of Consent – opt in/opt out
• The definitions of Death
• All
• Blood and Blood Products
• All Organs
• Cells
• Advanced cell therapies
• Tissues
• Engineered tissues
• Gametes Embryos
• Human Milk
• Genetic modification
• Xenotransplantation
12Patient Safety
Programme
Health Systems
and Innovation
Medical Products of Human Origin
An Organization Wide Initiative at WHO
Medical Products of Human Origin
An Organization Wide Initiative at WHO
• MPHO are intertwined
• Indistinct and changing limits in human application• Practices with one impact the others• no national borders for safety or ethical risks.
• Yet there are strong differences and particularities between sub-classes of MPOHO
• But the self-sufficiency paradigm applies to all, as MPHO from humans for humans, involve SOCIETY
• MPHO demand a consistency of practices. A set of common global governance
principles is necessary
03/02/2015
3
Legal Principles: Gift Law
• Gift law principles may have important
legal consequences for donation
–Legally binding transfer
–Prohibition on valuable consideration
–Altruism and volunteerism
Primary Legal Models
• Explicit Consent = OPT IN
• Presumed Consent = OPT OUT
Countries with Explicit Consent = Opt in
• Australia
• Canada
• Chile
• Cuba
• Denmark
• Estonia
• Germany
• Guatemala
• Ireland
• Japan
• Jordan
• Malaysia
• Lithuania
• Mexico
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• South Africa
• South Korea
• Thailand
• United Kingdom
• United States of America
• Venezuela
Presumed Consent defined for donation
The legal authority to recover organs from deceased adult individuals unless a refusal to donate was registered.
Countries with Presumed Consent = Opt Out
• Argentina
• Austria
• Belgium
• Bulgaria
• Croatia
• Cyprus
• Czech Republic
• Estonia
• Finland
• France
• Greece
• Hungary
• Italy
• Latvia
• Luxemburg
• Norway
• Panama
• Paraguay
• Poland
• Portugal
• Sinagapore
• Slovak Republic
• Slovenia
• Spain
• Sweden
First Person Consent
Adult individuals have the
right to make a legally
binding anatomical gift prior
to death.
03/02/2015
4
The function of
the brain
is irreplaceable
DEATH
Brain
scan
ELIGIBLE DCDDONOR
A medically suitable person who has been
declared dead based on the irreversible absence
of circulatory and respiratory functions as
stipulated by the law of the relevant jurisdiction,
within a time frame that enables organ recovery.
POTENTIAL DBDDONOR
A person whose clinical condition is suspected to
fulfill brain death criteria.
ELIGIBLE DBDDONOR
A medically suitable person who has been
declared dead based on neurologic criteria as
stipulated by the law of the relevant jurisdiction.
Critical pathways for organ donation*
POSSIBLE DECEASED ORGAN DONORA patient with a devastating brain injury or lesion OR a patient with circulatory failure
AND apparently medically suitable for organ donation
UTILIZED DCDDONOR
An actual donor from whom at least one organ
was transplanted.
Reasons why a potential donor does not become a utilized donor
System
• Failure to identify/refer a potential or eligible donor
• Brain death diagnosis not confirmed
(e.g. does not fulfill criteria) or completed
(e.g. lack of technical resources or clinician to make diagnosis or perform confirmatory tests)
• Circulatory death not declared within the appropriate
time frame.
• Logistical problems (e.g. no recovery team)
• Lack of appropriate recipient (e.g. child, blood type, serology positive)
Donor/Organ
• Medical unsuitability (e.g. serology positive, neoplasia)
• Haemodynamic instability / unanticipated cardiac
arrest
• Anatomical, histological and/or functional
abnormalities of organs
• Organs damaged during recovery
• Inadequate perfusion of organs or thrombosis
Permission
• Expressed intent of deceased not to be donor
• Relative’s refusal of permission for organ donation
• Refusal by coroner or other judicial officer to allow
donation for forensic reasons
POTENTIAL DCD DONOR
A. A person whose circulatory and respiratory
functions have ceased and resuscitative
measures are not to be attempted or continued.
or
B. A person in whom the cessation of circulatory
and respiratory functions is anticipated to occur
within a time frame that will enable organ
recovery.
Donation after BrainDeath (DBD)Treating physician
to identify/refer a potential donor
ACTUAL DBDDONOR
A consented eligible donor:
A. In whom an operative incision was made
with the intent of organ recovery for the
purpose of transplantation.
or
B. From whom at least one organ was
recovered for the purpose of transplantation.
UTILIZED DBDDONOR
An actual donor from whom at least one organ
was transplanted.
ACTUAL DCDDONOR
A consented eligible donor:
A. In whom an operative incision was made
with the intent of organ recovery for the
purpose of transplantation.
or
B. From whom at least one organ was
recovered for the purpose of transplantation.
Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD)
*The “dead donor rule” must be respected. That is, patients may only become donors after death, and the recovery of organs must not cause a donor’s death.
Transplant Type Kidney –
living
donor
Kidney
/Organs –
deceased
donor
Cornea
tissue.
imported
Cornea
tissue – local
Cell
transplant
Xeno
transplant
Gametes Blood
and
blood
products
Hospital
infrastructure
National
Infrastructure
Regulatory
framework
Legislative
framework
Scope of consideration for implementation
Transplant Type Kidney –
living
donor
Kidney
/Organs –
deceased
donor
Cornea
tissue.
imported
Cornea
tissue – local
Cell
transplant
Xeno
transplant
Gametes Blood
and
blood
products
Hospital
infrastructure
National
Infrastructure
Regulatory
framework
Legislative
framework
Scope of consideration for implementation
03/02/2015
5
GOVERNMENT OF FIJI __________ THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES DECREE 2013 ( Decree No ….of 2013) IN exercise of the powers vested in me as the President of the Republic of Fiji and Commander in Chief of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces by virtue of the Executive Authority of Fiji Decree … 2009, I hereby make the following Decree - TO REGULATE THE REMOVAL, STORAGE, AND TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS FOR THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES AND FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMERCIAL DEALINGS IN HUMAN ORGANS FOR MATTERS CONNECTED WITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. WHEREAS IT IS EXPEDIENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF REMOVAL,
STORAGE, AND TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS FOR THEURAPETIC
PURPOSES AND FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMERCIAL DEALINGS IN HUMAN
ORGANS.
PART 1- PRELIMINARY
1. Short title and commencement This Decree may be called the Transplantation of Human Organs Decree , 2013 and shall
come into force on a date appointed by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette.
2. Interpretation and Definitions (1). In this Decree, unless the context otherwise requires: “Advertisement” includes any form of advertising whether to the public generally or to any section of the public or individually to selected persons;
“Appropriate Authority” means the Appropriate Authority appointed under section 30.
“Authorization Committee” means the Committee constituted under section 60.
"blood product" means a product or extract derived or extracted from blood by any process
of manufacture.
"child" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years.
"designated officer" means:
(a) in relation to a hospital, a person appointed for the time being under
section 4 (1) to be a designated officer for a hospital, or
Questions:
1 What about minors & the legally incompetent
2 What about non-national recipients
3 What about non-national & unrelated donors
4 Ban or regulate advanced cell therapies
5 Private versus Public Hospitals
6 Minister advised by a committee for problems
7 Ethics committee review – is this self governing
8 How to define when reasonable fees become
profiteering and commercialism
9 Is the medical system capable
10 What penalty system will work
11 How is allocation of a scarce resource managed
A Legal Framework
GOVERNMENT OF FIJI __________ THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES DECREE 2013 ( Decree No ….of 2013) IN exercise of the powers vested in me as the President of the Republic of Fiji and Commander in Chief of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces by virtue of the Executive Authority of Fiji Decree … 2009, I hereby make the following Decree - TO REGULATE THE REMOVAL, STORAGE, AND TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS FOR THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES AND FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMERCIAL DEALINGS IN HUMAN ORGANS FOR MATTERS CONNECTED WITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. WHEREAS IT IS EXPEDIENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF REMOVAL,
STORAGE, AND TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS FOR THEURAPETIC
PURPOSES AND FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMMERCIAL DEALINGS IN HUMAN
ORGANS.
PART 1- PRELIMINARY
1. Short title and commencement This Decree may be called the Transplantation of Human Organs Decree , 2013 and shall
come into force on a date appointed by the Minister by notice published in the Gazette.
2. Interpretation and Definitions (1). In this Decree, unless the context otherwise requires: “Advertisement” includes any form of advertising whether to the public generally or to any section of the public or individually to selected persons;
“Appropriate Authority” means the Appropriate Authority appointed under section 30.
“Authorization Committee” means the Committee constituted under section 60.
"blood product" means a product or extract derived or extracted from blood by any process
of manufacture.
"child" means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years.
"designated officer" means:
(a) in relation to a hospital, a person appointed for the time being under
section 4 (1) to be a designated officer for a hospital, or
Parts:
1 Preliminary and Definitions
2 Donations of tissue by living persons
3 Use of tissue removed during medical, dental
or surgical treatment
4 Removal of Tissue after death
5 Regulation of Hospitals
6 Appropriate Authority
7 Registration of Hospitals
8 Prohibition of trading in tissue
9 Definition of Death
10 Enforcement
11 Miscellaneous
A Legal Framework
03/02/2015
1
Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation
(GODT)
International Technical Consultation on Cell, Tissue and Organ Donation and
Transplantation in The Western Pacific Region.
20 to 21 February 2014, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ms Mar Carmona ([email protected])
Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), Spain
BackgroundBackground
� In response to the request made in Resolution WHA57.18 in 2004. This request was reiterated in Resolution WHA63.22 in 2010.
2005
URGES Member States:
(7) to collaborate in collecting data including adverse events and reactions on the practices, safety, quality,
efficacy, epidemiology and ethics of donation and transplantation;
REQUESTS the Director-General:
(3) to continue collecting and analyzing global data on the practices, safety, quality, efficacy, epidemiology
and ethics of donation and transplantation of human cells, tissues and organs;
http://www.transplant-observatory.org
-Resources covered by ONT
-ONT officially designated
WHO CC
• 194 Member States in the six WHO Regions: AFR, AMR, EMR, EUR, SEAR, WPR
Scope
• Information for organs: legislative and organizational aspects and annual donation and transplantation activities
• Available to everyone
• Information for tissues and cells: A similar process will be followed
Content
• National Health Authorities or officially designated by them
Source of data
Global Database: SettingsGlobal Database: Settings
Data
collection
• Ad hoc questionnaire to the national focal points
• Reminders (E-mail)
• Reception of data
• Deadlines: every year in Q2/Q3
Data
management
• Revision of data and clarification whenever discrepancies are found (by E-mail or phone)
• Data entry in the database
• Validation, data check and final approval by Member States
Data analysis
• Calculation of indicators of donation and transplantation (country, regional and global
estimates)
• Further analysis
• Graphics and official maps
Publication
• Publication in the GODT website
• Presentations / Other
• Journals
Methodology: collection of annual activity dataMethodology: collection of annual activity data
QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Data
collection
• Ad hoc questionnaire to the national focal points
• Reminders (E-mail)
• Reception of data
• Deadlines: every year in Q2/Q3
Data
management
• Revision of data and clarification whenever discrepancies are found (by E-mail or phone)
• Data entry in the database
• Validation, data check and final approval by Member States
Data analysis
• Calculation of indicators of donation and transplantation (country, regional and global
estimates)
• Further analysis
• Graphics and official maps
Publication
• Publication in the GODT website
• Presentations / Other
• Journals
Methodology: collection of annual activity dataMethodology: collection of annual activity data
03/02/2015
2
Conclusions
� The knowledge of demand for transplantation, availability of organs from
deceased and living donors and the access to transplantation is essential to
monitor global trends in transplantation needs.
� Information regarding the existence of legislation and regulatory oversight is
fundamental to ensure safety and the ethical practice of organ donation and
transplantation in accordance with international standards.
� The global availability of information � prerequisite to demonstrate
transparency, equity and to monitor transplant systems in countries.
�Areas of improvement:
- Reinforce the collaboration between NHA and professionals, and
WHO/ONT for the collection of data (special attention should be
paid for tissues and cells)
Conclusions II
The global database is the result of dedicated
efforts to strengthen the network of focal
points, and it is the result of their valuable
contribution to providing annual data.
Thank you…
Mar Carmona: [email protected]
2015-02-03
1
What we have done for promoting organ donation in
Korea ?- recognizing the problem and finding the solution -
Won-Hyun Cho, MD.Keimyung University School of Medicine,
Vitallink - Korean Network for Organ Donation
WHO technical consultation 2014, Seoul
2014-02-20 12014 WHO Technical Consultation
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 2Organ donation
Promotion by each transplant center
1969:LDKT
1979:DDKT
1988:DDLT
No of Deceased donorPMP
3.4Traveling through DesertTraveling through DesertTraveling through DesertTraveling through Desert
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
Number of Deceased donor before legislation of transplantation law
Year DonorNumber of transplanted organ
Total Kidney Liver Pancreas
< 3
> 3
Procure rate / donor
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 4• Legislation of organ transplantation law in 1999Necessity of Brain death law • KONOS (Korean Network for Organ Sharing) in 2000Need nationwide organ allocation system • Hospital based OPO from 2003Need organ procure organization • By KONOS from 2000 Need nationwide waiting list • Transplantation law from 2000Prohibit organ trade inside of Korea
Recognition of problem and solution in 1999
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation1991: NGOs for organ
Promotion activity
Organ donation Promotion by each
transplant center
1969:LDKT
1979:DDKT
1988:DDLT
1993: KMA guideline
for BD1995: Brain Death Seoul Declaration
1999: Transplantation
law
2000: KONOS
No of Deceased donor transplantation
8.03.4 5.85
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 63.42 1.09 1.08 0.75 1.41 1.77 1.87 2.88 3.00 5.17 5.24 5.31 7.24 8.03162 52 52 36 68 86 91 141 148 256 261 268 368 409051015202530
0501001502002503003504004501999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yearly change of Deceased Donor
LegislationKONOS
KODAKoDoNet
No of DD DD pmp
2015-02-03
2
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 7Transplant
tourismProlonged waiting
time than before
Ask self sufficiency
Kidnap ?Murder?
After legislation but organ donation is still not sufficient
Istanbuldeclaration
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 8How can we solve these problems? How can we solve these problems? How can we solve these problems? How can we solve these problems? Increase organ donation, Increase organ donation, Increase organ donation, Increase organ donation, especially Deceased donorespecially Deceased donorespecially Deceased donorespecially Deceased donor
Types of organ donor, donation rate and transplantation rate per million population
Country Spain USA France Italy UK Germany Korea
2005Korea
2012
Total population
(million)
44.1 298.2 61.8 56.9 59.0 82.5 48.7 50.1
No. of Deceased D
1,546 7,593 1,371 1,197 753 1,220 91 408
Donation rate / pmp 35.1 25.5 22.2 21 12.8 14.8 1.87 8
No. of TPX from DD 3,720 21,225 4,152 3,261 2,332 3,914 285 1,313
TPX rate / pmp
84.3 71.2 67.1 57.3 39.5 47.4 5.85 26.3
No. of TPX from LD
112 6,886 246 129 551 600 1,270 1,878
TPX rate / pmp
2.5 23.1 4.0 2.3 9.3 7.2 26.1 37.62014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 92005
Recognizing and solution of organ donation system (2007 – 2009)
• System
– Need revision of Transplant law for required reporting system
– Need independent OPO system for organ procure
• Medical : How to increase procure rate per donor
– Transplant center meeting – cooperation during procurement
– Revise allocation system (region, status)
• Social : to get more consensus for organ donation
– Expanded campaign for donation to students
– Communication with Police office, MoH, Congress, Journalist
– Donor family management, bereavement, public awareness
– Realize problems of living donor safety2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 111991: NGOs for organ
Promotion activity
Organ donation Promotion by each
transplant center
1969:LDKT
1979:DDKT
1988:DDLT
1993: KMA guideline
for BD1995: Brain Death Seoul Declaration
1999: Transplantation
law
2000: KONOS
2003:HOPO
2007:Donation of Boxing Champion
2008: Donation BY Cardinal
Kim
No of Deceased donor transplantation
8.03.4 5.8
Increase the number
of deceased donor !
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 12Solution
2015-02-03
3
051015202530352014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 13No of deceased donor per million populationNo of deceased donor per million population
presumed consentpresumed consent
explicit consentexplicit consent
(ROK: 271/50M=5.42)
Activation of deceased donor transplantation
National factors increasing organ donation rate
Activation of deceased donor transplantation
National factors increasing organ donation rate
• Potential for donation ---- MRR first
• To donor hospital or doctor --- revise law• Required referral• Required request
• Legislative environment --- need national consensus• Opting-out (presumed consent)• Opting-in (explicit consent)
The Eurotransplant experience2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 163.42 1.09 1.08 0.75 1.41 1.77 1.87 2.88 3.00 5.17 5.24 5.31 7.24 8.03162 52 52 36 68 86 91 141 148 256 261 268 368 409051015202530
0501001502002503003504004501999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yearly change of Deceased Donor
LegislationKONOS
No of DD DD pmpKODA, Vitallink
KoDoNet
Activation of deceased donor transplantation
National factors increasing organ donation rate
Activation of deceased donor transplantation
National factors increasing organ donation rate
• Potential for donation ---- MRR first
• To donor hospital or duty doctor• Required referral (revise law)• Education to the staff
• Legislative environment --- need national consensus• Opting-out (presumed consent)• Opting-in (explicit consent)
The Eurotransplant experience2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Korean Transplant
societyVitallink
http://vitallink.or.kr
AcademicSocial Affairs,Promote organ Donation
2015-02-03
4
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 19Revised Transplant Law in 2010
Medical director should inform the fact when they treated suspected brain death patient to OPO
and the director of OPO must report that to KONOS
Renal transplantation Hemodialysis p-value
Personal 1,770,109 ± 577,123 5,204,455 ± 1,754,843 <0.0001
Insurance 6,322,873 ± 2,072,925 20,196,557 ± 3,317,718 <0.0001
Total 8,092,982 ± 2,615,741 25,401,012± 3,865,674 <0.00012014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
Publish educational materials
Education to students
Donor Sound of recipient
Transplant Games in Korea
Develop health care policy direction
Make video, clips for campaign
Education to point of contact
vitallink.or.kr
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Founded
Independent OPO (KODA)
2011. 6. 27(started from 2009)
Education, Education, Educationfor people of point of contact
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Networking between NGOs
Korean Organ Donation Network (KoDoNet)2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 24
Organ donation campaign by NGOs in Korea
From early 1990’Networking from 2010
2015-02-03
5
Networking of various NGOsfor effective, professional campaign
from 2010
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Start Nationwide Transplant Database from 2009
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 27How about result ?
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 281991: NGOs for organ
Promotion activity
Organ donation Promotion by each
transplant center
1969:LDKT
1979:DDKT
1988:DDLT
1993: KMA guideline
for BD1995: Brain Death Seoul Declaration
1999: Transplantation
law
2000: KONOS
2003:HOPO
2011:KODA
2010: Revised Law
2007:Donation of Boxing Champion
2008: Donation BY Cardinal
Kim
NGO+Gov.Transplant Game
Media playPolice agency + MoHW
No of Deceased donor transplantation
8.03.4 5.8Cooperative work with
National Police Self-governing unit
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 293.42 1.09 1.08 0.75 1.41 1.77 1.87 2.88 3.00 5.17 5.24 5.31 7.24 8.03162 52 52 36 68 86 91 141 148 256 261 268 368 409051015202530
0501001502002503003504004501999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yearly change of Deceased Donor
LegislationKONOS
KODAVitallink
KoDoNet
No of DD DD pmp
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 303.42 1.09 1.08 0.75 1.41 1.77 1.87 2.88 3.00 5.17 5.24 5.31 7.24 8.03162 52 52 36 68 86 91 141 148 256 261 268 368 409051015202530
0501001502002503003504004501999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Yearly change of Deceased Donor
LegislationKONOS
No of DD DD pmp
2013Revised law
2015-02-03
6
Recent action direction of Vitallink
• To achieve 10 million donor card• Cooperative work with Hospital director, Self-governing officer, Journalist• Visual activity of the transplanted recipient to the public : WTG• Mobile campaign using smartphone2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
Campaign to have Donor Card from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Year Donor card holder Actual donor2009 2012 2020 Before 2000 47,224 1 1 ?2000-2003 19,949 12004 35,321 1 80 ?2005 77,166 1 2 100 ?2006 90,732 6 6 300 ?2007 81,149 7 7 200 ?2008 74,841 4 4 200 ?2009 185,046 8 8 200 ?2010 124,377 11 100 ?2011 94,737 14 100 ?2012 87,754 11 200 ?2013 118,871 ???2020 (10,000,000) ???2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 33
Collaborative work with Hospital director, self-governing officer, Ministry of Health, OPO
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1World
TransplantGames
Increaseorgan
donation rateabout 15%
Mount Climb by Recipients2008 Seoul NU team
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Donor family & people realized that their decision of donation is not a useless one
but a precious sacrifice, and proud of it !
2015-02-03
7
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Pattern of CampaignPattern of CampaignPattern of CampaignPattern of Campaign
Why SNS ?
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Easily spread information to the public& Can communicate
Discussion about living donor safety & support to the donor
- Nationary Assembly -
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Raise ethical problem in transplantation and organ donation
to the public
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Have you ever heard about organ
shortage and its related problems?
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1What does mean ?
No?
No !……
Never heard
No…
Repeat education and campaign !Summary - 2
Vitallink International
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1Share our experience and joint growth in Asian countriesSummary - 3
2015-02-03
8
2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 43Self-sufficiency of organ donor :
not achieved at one moment, not by single action of campaign
1969 ---------------2013 Evaluation of present status ,& Repeat planning of new Breakthrough2014 need new
breakthrough
Summary-1
It begins with a small ball of snow !2014-02-20 2014 WHO Technical Consultation 1If we roll that snow ball again and again, we can make snowman