16
Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University of Arizona Transformation-induced stress in austenite associated with shape memory effect in NiTi

Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George

Dept. of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Arizona

Transformation-induced stress in austenite associated with shape memory effect in NiTi

Page 2: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Quantified transformation-induced strain state of Austenite in the two-phase region

The induced tetragonal strain Tensor removes the phonon instability Austenite in the two-phase region

- The strain

- Temperature dependence

Page 3: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

NiTi: Austenite (B2)↔(B19’) Martensite phase transformation is displacive

- Phonon instability Softening of TA phonons near

zone boundaries

- In two-phase (B2+B19’) region:Transformation stresses

stabilize B2

Page 4: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

ε ij(B2)

strain

superelasticity

Objectives:

Using molecular dynamics simulations

• What is the internal strain state (i.e. strain tensor) of austenite in the two-phase region associated with the shape memory effect in NiTi?

• Temperature dependence of the strain?

On the nature of transformation-induced strain in Austenite

Characteristic internal strain tensor that makes B2 stable in two-phase region

- shape memory effect- superelasticity

Page 5: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

B2-B19’ phase transformation as a function of temperature

450 K370 K330 K250 K100% B2100% B19’

Page 6: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

B19’ phase fraction as a function of temperature

• Phase fractions from sufficiently large supercells

Size-I : 25 Å X 25 Å X 200 Å

Size-II: 50 Å X 50 Å X 200 Å

Size-III: 75 Å X 75 Å X 200 Å

Page 7: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Martensite phase fraction as a function of temperature

Tm --- temperature for maximum transformation rate

g, v – dictate the transformation rate

Zotov et al. Journal of alloys and compounds 616(2014)385Richards J. Exp. Bot 10 (1959) 290

- Richards equation[Richards] – for growth of plant population- Zotov et al. used to describe the evolution of phase fractions [zotov et al]

Page 8: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Strained lattice parameters of Austenite phase as a function of temperature

strained-B2

(001)

(010)

(100)

extrapolatedUnstrained

lattice parameter

εin[100] = (a[100]-aunstrained)/aunstrained

In the two-phase region aunstrained of B2 is obtained by extrapolation

Page 9: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Measured principal strains on Austenite phase as a function of temperature(001)

(010)

(100)

strained-B2

εin[010] = εin[100]

εin[001]• Strain state of austenite in two-

phase region : tetragonal strain

• What equation based on phenomenology best describes the strain as function of T?

Page 10: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

The relationship between Martensite fraction and the principal strains in Austenite

Richard equation ?

Page 11: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Martensite phase fraction with internal strain on austenite phase, in [100] or [010] direction:

Martensite phase fraction with temperature [Zotov et al.]

The relationship between Martensite fraction and the principal strains in Austenite

ε0= 0.0119

Strain in austenite as a function of temperature

0

Page 12: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Variation of strain in austenite as a function of temperature

a1= -0.0198, b1=2.451a2= -0.0370, b2=8.643

0

Page 13: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Phonon dispersion of austenite phase with and without lattice strain at 364 K

Austenite at T=364 K with no strain Austenite at T=364 K with no calculated strains

- In two-phase region (austenite + martensite): - the phonon instability dissappears due to the transformation induced strains/stress in austenite

- The principal strains are quantified

Page 14: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Summary

• The transformation-induced strain state in austenite in the two-phase region associated with shape memory effect in NiTi is quantified

• Tetragonal-form strain tensor is found to stabilize the austenite

• The strain that removes the phonon instability is found to vary exponentially with temperature

Page 15: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

Acknowledgment

• We thank Dr. Ting Zhu (Woodruff school of mechanical engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology) for the EAM potential

Page 16: Sourav Gur, Venkateswara Rao Manga, Stefan Bringuier, Krishna Muralidharan, Frantziskonis George Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering University

The Austenite (B2)↔(B19’)Martensite phase transformation is displacive

- Phonon instability Softening of TA phonons near zone boundaries

- In two-phase (B2+B19’) region:Transformation stresses

stabilize B2

• What is the internal-strain state (i.e. strain tensor) of austenite in the two-phase region associated with the shape memory effect?

• Is the strain tensor of a particular type over

the entire range?

ε ij(B2)

strain

superelasticity