Upload
nijole
View
20
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Seminar “Strengthening Development Cooperation in Enlarged Europe” Luxembourg - 9 & 10 December 2004. SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) INTEGRA (Slovakia): towards a new partnership ? A collaboration initiative between two NGO’s. Contents. Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
SeminarSeminar“Strengthening Development Cooperation“Strengthening Development Cooperation
in Enlarged Europe”in Enlarged Europe” Luxembourg - 9 & 10 December 2004 Luxembourg - 9 & 10 December 2004
SOS FAIM (Luxembourg)SOS FAIM (Luxembourg)
INTEGRA (Slovakia):INTEGRA (Slovakia):
towards a new partnership ?towards a new partnership ?
A collaboration initiative between two NGO’sA collaboration initiative between two NGO’s
ContentsContents
Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRAPresentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA
Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’sCommon aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s
Context for the collaborationContext for the collaboration
Building up of the partnershipBuilding up of the partnership
The common projectThe common project
Added value and limits of the partnershipAdded value and limits of the partnership
Conclusions and discussionConclusions and discussion
Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRAPresentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA
I. I. SOS FAIMSOS FAIM
Independent and professionalIndependent and professional
Long term development in AfricaLong term development in Africa
Three priorities:Three priorities:
– Developing peasants organizationDeveloping peasants organization– Supporting microfinance institutionsSupporting microfinance institutions– Public information in LuxembourgPublic information in Luxembourg
Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRAPresentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA
II. II. INTEGRAINTEGRA
““Helping people to build their businesses to Helping people to build their businesses to become « Islands of Integrity » and participate become « Islands of Integrity » and participate in the transformation of their communities”in the transformation of their communities”
Three Strategic Programs:Three Strategic Programs:
- Social Enterprise Program- Social Enterprise Program
- Micro-Enterpirse Development Program for - Micro-Enterpirse Development Program for WomenWomen
- Corporate Social Responsibility Program- Corporate Social Responsibility Program
10 years of development experience in Eastern Europe10 years of development experience in Eastern Europe
Starting to operate in AfricaStarting to operate in Africa
Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’sCommon aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s
I.I. Common aspectsCommon aspects
ProfessionalProfessional
Similar views on MicrofinanceSimilar views on Microfinance
Strong positions in their own countriesStrong positions in their own countries
Open to new collaborationsOpen to new collaborations
Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’sCommon aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s
II. II. DifferencesDifferences
Confessional / non confessionalConfessional / non confessional
Different uses of the microfinance toolDifferent uses of the microfinance tool
Different geographical prioritiesDifferent geographical priorities
Human and financial resourcesHuman and financial resources
Context of the collaborationContext of the collaboration
New Member States (NMS) = new donorsNew Member States (NMS) = new donors
Political will of EC to support NMS NGO’sPolitical will of EC to support NMS NGO’s
SOS FAIM & INTEGRA: open-minded NGO’sSOS FAIM & INTEGRA: open-minded NGO’s
Building up the partnershipBuilding up the partnership
Initiative of SOS FAIMInitiative of SOS FAIM
Identification of NMS NGO’sIdentification of NMS NGO’s
(Internet, TRIALOG, etc…)(Internet, TRIALOG, etc…)
Trip in Czech Republic & Slovakia (May ’04)Trip in Czech Republic & Slovakia (May ’04)
(Meeting with MFA, UNDP, NGOs, embassies and universities)(Meeting with MFA, UNDP, NGOs, embassies and universities)
Building up the partnershipBuilding up the partnership
Conclusions of the first missionConclusions of the first mission::
Easier context in Slovakia than in Czech RepublicEasier context in Slovakia than in Czech Republic
Different geographical prioritiesDifferent geographical priorities
Small NGO’s need institutional supportSmall NGO’s need institutional support
Building up the partnershipBuilding up the partnership
Identification of INTEGRA as a possible partnerIdentification of INTEGRA as a possible partner
Identification of a joint projectIdentification of a joint project
Second mission in Slovakia (August ’04)Second mission in Slovakia (August ’04)
Redaction of the projectRedaction of the project
Application to EC (B-21-02-03)Application to EC (B-21-02-03)
The common project:The common project:
‘Microfinance: let beneficiaries speak’‘Microfinance: let beneficiaries speak’
Development education projectDevelopment education project
Focus on the microfinance beneficiaries Focus on the microfinance beneficiaries
Human approach (rather than a technical one)Human approach (rather than a technical one)
To schools & universities, corporations, NGO’sTo schools & universities, corporations, NGO’s
National campaign in the two countriesNational campaign in the two countries
3 years time span (2006-2008)3 years time span (2006-2008)
Added value and limits of the partnershipAdded value and limits of the partnership
I.I. Added valueAdded value
New partnership = new ideasNew partnership = new ideas
Geographical crossroads approachGeographical crossroads approach
Common understanding between 2 NGO’s Common understanding between 2 NGO’s
Similar needs in the two countriesSimilar needs in the two countries
Learning from each otherLearning from each other
Added value and limits of the partnershipAdded value and limits of the partnership
II. II. Limits
Small NGO’s: limited human & financial resourcesSmall NGO’s: limited human & financial resources
A new partnership : needs to be consolidatedA new partnership : needs to be consolidated
Language issuesLanguage issues
Distance between the two countriesDistance between the two countries
Dependence on public fundingDependence on public funding
Conclusions and discussionConclusions and discussion
Conclusions:Conclusions:
New and still “theoretical” partnershipNew and still “theoretical” partnership
Building up a partnership requires timeBuilding up a partnership requires time
IMPORTANCE TO MEET PEOPLEIMPORTANCE TO MEET PEOPLE(institutional relationships = first human ones !)(institutional relationships = first human ones !)
Starting a new partnership = a great challenge !Starting a new partnership = a great challenge !
Conclusions and discussionConclusions and discussion
Discussion (proposal …):Discussion (proposal …):
Western NGO’s / NMS NGO’s :Western NGO’s / NMS NGO’s :
a fair partnership or a new business ?a fair partnership or a new business ?
THANK YOU !THANK YOU !
Thierry DEFENSE, SOS FAIM (Luxembourg)Thierry DEFENSE, SOS FAIM (Luxembourg)
Marek MARKUS, INTEGRA (Slovakia)Marek MARKUS, INTEGRA (Slovakia)