Upload
marlene-simmons
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Some New Ideas for Reliability Studies
Stefan Steiner, Jock MacKay and Richard Cook
University of Waterloo
Quality and Productivity Research Conference
Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 19, 2005 2
Outline
Background and Motivation
Idea 1 – adding extra observations
Idea 2 – selecting units
Tentative conclusions
May 19, 2005 3
Measurement reliability studies
Medical examples reliability of the ultrasonographers for the measurement of
stenosis in the carotid artery clinical assessment of patients with psoriatic arthritis
Industrial examples Piston head diameters Parking brake tightness
May 19, 2005 4
Standard Measurement Reliability (Gage R&R) Study
Goal is to estimateor
y y
y y
y y
k
k
n nk
11 1
21 2
1
,...,
,...,
....
,...,
Y T Mij i j
( )total
( )parts
(measurement)
2 2( ) / ( )parts measurement
2 2 2parts parts measurement
May 19, 2005 5
General Context
Two sources of variation measurement model
general two component model: X vs. Rest
2 2, Y T MY T M
Y
R
Var E Y X E Var Y X
Var E Y X
[ ( | )] [ ( | )]
[ ( | )] 2
(within)(between)
May 19, 2005 6
Ideas
Suppose we have complete or partial knowledge of the distribution of Y:
What is the gain if we know (i.e. ) or use supplementary data from the baseline investigation?
Motivation: Gage R&R study on piston head diameters
What units should we select?
Motivation: Disassembly/Reassembly investigation for door closing effort
Y total
May 19, 2005 7
Idea 1: Add Baseline Data
Add Baseline data:
Standard reliability study
y y
y y
y y
k
k
n nk
11 1
21 2
1
,...,
,...,
....
,...,
Y T Mij i j
( )total
( )parts
(measurement)
y yn n m 1, ...
May 19, 2005 8
Estimating
Sum of squares df EMS Within W nk( )1 m2 Between B n1 m pk
2 2
Between B* m1 m p2 2
( ) / , ( )* 1 21 1
B
Wk
B
W
( ) a a1 21
Look at as a function of n, k, m andstdev( ) /
May 19, 2005 9
n=10, k=3, m=1,2,…., 0 33 1 0 3 0. , . , .
. 3 3
1 0.
3 0.
. 3 3
1 0.
3 0.
May 19, 2005 10
n=4, k=6, m=1,2,….,
.33
1 0.
3 0.
0 33 1 0 3 0. , . , .
May 19, 2005 11
n=2, k=11, m=1,2,….,
.33
1 0.
3 0.
0 33 1 0 3 0. , . , .
May 19, 2005 12
Conclusions for Idea 1
Effects of adding extra observations are greatest when is large, i.e. most variation comes from the parts when n is small
There are some design implications
May 19, 2005 13
Idea 2: Select Specify Units
Suppose the baseline distribution of Y is known, e.g. N(0,1).
Motivation: Consider a problem where we wish to determine whether variation in y is due to assembly or components?
In an investigation we repeatedly disassembly and reassembly two car doors, measuring the closing force each time.
Standard practice is to select two units with extreme and opposite values of y
May 19, 2005 14
Assessing Idea 2
Select one unit with
Disassemble & reassemble, measure
Model
Estimate the intra-class correlation
Y z0
y y yk1 2, , ...,
Y Y Y Y z N z Ikt
1 2 0 1 1 11, ,..., | ~ ( ,( ) ( ) )
2 2, Y C AY C A
May 19, 2005 15
Why Use Extreme Units?
Use two extremes Use two randomly chosen units
lowhigh
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
velocity
clos
ing
effo
rt
lowhigh
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
velocity
clos
ing
effo
rt
What happens when all the variation is due to Assembly (measurement)?Components (process/parts)?
May 19, 2005 16
When all Variation is Due to
Assembly (or Measurement)
We get a lot of information from the initial (extreme) values observed in the baseline
lowhigh
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
velocity
clos
ing
effo
rt
lowhigh
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
velocity
clos
ing
effo
rt
Use two extremes Use two randomly chosen units
May 19, 2005 17
Assessing Idea 2
Simulation study (use 5000 trials) Measure one unit k times Compare results for different true intraclass corrrelations
Compare the approaches Using the extreme unit (initial value z) – determine the
maximum likelihood estimate for Using a random unit – estimate the measurement variation
with the sample stdev, then
2p
21 m
May 19, 2005 18
= 0.2, k = 20, z = 2
May 19, 2005 19
= 0.2, k = 20, z = 4
May 19, 2005 20
= 0.2, k = 5, z = 2
May 19, 2005 21
= 0.8, k = 20, z = 2
May 19, 2005 22
Conclusions for Idea 2
Selection provides large advantages in some cases Better than random selection when is small. Good precision even with very small samples Advantage greater when
number of repeated measurements is small we use a more extreme unit
Selection can be used to advantage in reliability studies if we use order statistic to select units for repeated measurement.
May 19, 2005 23
Tentative Overall Conclusions
For problems with two variance components, we get relatively small benefit adding extra observations on the total large benefit by selecting units extreme in the total
Remaining Problems more than two components, e.g. different labs, operators
etc. selection based on order statistics