57
Scholars' Mine Scholars' Mine Professional Degree Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 1941 Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings Alfred H. Hesse Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/professional_theses Part of the Metallurgy Commons Department: Department: Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Hesse, Alfred H., "Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings" (1941). Professional Degree Theses. 283. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/professional_theses/283 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Professional Degree Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Scholars' Mine Scholars' Mine

Professional Degree Theses Student Theses and Dissertations

1941

Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Alfred H. Hesse

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/professional_theses

Part of the Metallurgy Commons

Department: Department:

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Hesse, Alfred H., "Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings" (1941). Professional Degree Theses. 283. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/professional_theses/283

This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Professional Degree Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Page 2: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

SOME CAUSES FOR P O"ROSITY AND LEA-KAGE IN NON - FERROUS

CASTINGS.

BY

ALFRED H. HESSE .

A

THESIS

submitted to the faculty of the

SCHOOL OF MHIES AND METALLURGY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MI SSOURI

in partial fulfillment of the work re quired for the

Degree Of

:METALLURGICAL ENGINEER

Rolla, Mo.

1941.

Professor of Metallurgical Engineering and Ore Dressing.

Page 3: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUB ,JEC T PAGE

STA TEMENT OF PR OBI~EM •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1

I'JIT011N FACTS BEARING ON THE PROBI,EM ( THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS}............................. 2

(a) Introduc t ion •••••••••••••••••••••• 2 (b) Gas Porosity...................... 4 (c) Intercrystalline Shrinkage Porosity 7

EXPr~~ HJE l-rTAL (a) (b)

( c) ( d)

DI SCUS SI ON OF ( a ) (b)

( c)

"pm CEDURE ................................ . Study of Gas Porosity ••••••••••••• Stu dy of Intercrystalline Shrinkage Porosity ••••.••••••.•.••••••.•••••

Effect of alloying elements ••••• Influence of pouring temperatures

Hydraulic Pressure Testing •••••••• Density Determinations, Voids, and

Soundness Calculations •••••••••

RESULTS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Study of Gas Porosity ••••••••••••• Study of I ntercrystalline Shrinkage

Porosity ••.••..•.............•• Effect of alloying elements •••• Influence of pouring temperatures

Hydraulic Pressure' Testing ••••••••

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ••• e ........................... .

BI BLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

10 10 16

16 17 18

19

21 21

26 26 27 30

31

33

Page 4: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

APPENDICES

Chemical Analysis of Alloys JvIelted Under Ga s Atmospheres ••••••••••••••••••••••

Effect of Pouring Temperature on Various Physical Properties ••••••••••••••••••

Hydraulic Pressure Testing Data on Hollow Cylinder Specimens (Composition "Gil) ••

Maximum Density Values ••••••••••••••••••••

Chart Showing Ef f ect of Various Gas Atmospheres on Soundness •••••••••••••

Chart Showing Effect of Elements in Composi t ion Il G" on Soundness •••••••••

Soundness-Pouring Temperature Curve ••••••• Physical Properties - Pourin g Temperature

Curve ••.•••••••..••••.•.•••••..••••.• Strength - Soundness Curve •••••••••••••••• Soundness - Pouring Temperature Curve

(Effect of Shape and Design) ••••••••• Photograph Showing Effect of Various Gas

Atmospheres on Soundness ••••••••••••• Phot ograph Showing Effect of Various Gas

Atmospheres on Soundness ••••••••••••• Photograph Showing Effect of El ements in

Composition IfGn on Soundness ••••••••• Details of Holl ow Cylinder Test Casting ••• Details of Tensile Test Specimen Casting •• Tensile Test Specimen Casting •••••••••••••

Hollow Cylinder Test Casting ••••••••••••••

Hydraulic Pressure Testing Device •••••••••

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3 Table 4

Plate 1

Plate 2 Plate 3

Plate 4 Plate 5

Plate 6

Plate 7

Plate 8

Plate 9 Pl ate 10 Plate 11 Plate 12, Figure 1

Plate 12, Figure 2

Plate 13

Page 5: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

STATEMENT OF PROBT/EM

1. Non -ferrous copper base alloys find many

applications in industry. Among these alloys one finds

the tin bronzes r a ther widely used for many purposes,

and by delving still farther one finds pressure ca st­

ings as one of their important applications. In many

foundries the percentage of rejections due to leakage

or porosity is quite h i gh. This is obviously very costly

since leakage is generally only found after machining.

It is with a view to determine the causes for leakage

in pressure castings an d to devise methods for its pre­

vention that the work described i n this thesis wa s un­

dertaken. It is not intended to cover the subject com­

pletely. Furthermore, the author wi shes to direct at­

tention to the fact that the work was conducted primarily

to increase the knowledge on the behavior of t hese alloys

under certain controlled conditions and that no attempt

was made to adhere to existing s pecifica tions other than

chemical composition.

2. Porosity in any casting whether ferrous

or non-ferrous is undesi:i'i!£ble. Its importance depends

on the purpose for wh ich the casting is ma de. For ex­

ample", castings which are required to withstand steam,

hydraulic, or pneumatic pressure mus~not be porous.

- 1 -

Page 6: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Conversely, a rea sonable amount of porosity is not

obj ectionable in structural and other c a stings which

are not used under pressure.

3. This i nves ti gation covers non-ferrous

p ressure c a stings in wh ich p orosity is extremely im­

portant. The p rimary purpose of the s"1ra.dy is to es­

t abl ish the reasons for porosity and to devise methods

for its prevention. The ob j ect of this report is (1)

to review the litera ture on non-ferrous pressure c a st­

i ngs and, (2) to present the data, results, and con­

clusions from work done by the author.

KNOWN FACTS B:r~ARnTG ON THE PROBJJEM (THEORETICAL

C0NSIDER4.TIONS)

(a) Introduction

4. There are several non-ferrous alloys

commonly used f or the manufacture of pressure castings.

Two of these alloys seem to be more extensively used

that the others, and for the purpose of simplification

they ahall hereafter be referred to as composition "G"

an d comp osi t ion "MTI. Actually these alloys have many

trade names; for example, composition "GTI is sometimes

called n G" bronze, gun metal, 88-10-2, 88-8-4, etc.,

and composition TlMn , leaded tin bronze, steam or valve

bronze, commercial 88-10-2, etc. The nominal chemical

- 2 -

Page 7: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

composition of composition "G" is 87.25 per cent copper,

9 per cent tin , 3 per cent z inc, and 0.75 per cent nic k~l.

The n ominal ch emical composition of composition llM" is

88.0 per cent copper, 6.5 p er cent tin, 4.0 per cent

zinc, 1.5 per cent lead, and 1.0 per cent nickel permiss­

ible. These alloys a re somewhat similar in chemical com­

position. Although the lead contain ed in composition "1.1"

i ncreases machinabi Ii ty, the t ensi Ie strength is l owered

by the lead i n combina tion wi th a lower tin content. How­

ever, from the stan dpoint of cost of materials co mposition

"M" is less exp ensive.

5. An extensive search of the literature failed

to reveal any substant i at ing evidence in re gard to which

of the t wo alloys is ~etter for pressure castin gs. One

point of view is that the lead in composition "M" tends

to fill the cavities formed during the process of sol­

idification which results in a less porous casting. Al­

though t his report covers only composition "G", some

investigations are in progress i n which an attempt is

bein~ made to determine which of the two alloys is pre­

ferable for pressure casting purposes.

6. The lack of pressure tightness may arise

from a number of causes, such as cracks, cold shuts,

blowholes, and sand incl~ions. All of these faults

- 3 -

Page 8: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

can b e avoided by pr oper fOllTIdry technique. However ,

gas p ockets and minute intercrystalline cavities or

chann els are more difficult to eliminate.

(b) Gas Porosity

7. The pos s ible sources of gas porosity are:

(1) absorbed gases may be present in the r aw mater ials

or absorption may take place during the mel t ing process;

(2) insoluble mold gas es may be trapped in the metal

during casting; and (3) metallic oxi des present in the "

molten metal wh en cast may be reduced to form carbon mon­

oxide and carbon di oxide whi ch are trapped during solid­

i fi ca tion.

8. The solubility of some gases in molten

bronze increases with temperature, and during solidifica­

tion the solubi lity decreases. Thus it is possible for

any precipitated gas to become trapped internally to form

gas cavities. Investigations have been made on the effect

on porosity of various gases which might be carried in

with the raw materials or absorbed during the melting

process. Daniels (6) stated that carbon dioxide, nitro­

gen, and carbon monoxide have no effect on composition

"G" and that hydrogen causes unsoundness. Jenkins (18)

in" his review of the literature on composition "G" sug­

gested that sulphur dioxide, carbon dioxide, and carbon

- 4 -

Page 9: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

monoxide are the occluded furnace and melting gases

which form cavities. Bolton and Weigand (5) ran a

practical foundry test involving over 100,000 castings

(c omposition "GT! and similar bronzes) and found that

by melting under a neutral or slightly oxidizing at­

mosphere a greater number of pressure-ti ght castings

were produced than under a highly reducing atmosphere

averaging 7 per cent carbon monoxide. Daniels (6)

and Jenkins (18) confirmed the work of Bolton and

Weigand (5). Bailey (19) suggested that hydro gen and

water vapor also might have a deleterious effect on

pressure castings. Claus and Bauer (17) studied the

i nfluence of gas solubility on inverse segregation in

t in bronzes and concluded that neutral gases, carbon

monoxide plus carbon dioxide and nitrogen have a normal

influence, while hydro gen gives extreme inverse segre­

gation; that hydrogen sulfide, which reacts to form

cuprous sulfide and hydrogen, has the same effect as

hydrogen; and that sulphur dioxide, which forms cuprous

sulfide and stannic oxide, has no effect. They found

that phosphorus and lithium tend to reduce the dissolved

uncombined hydrogen and decrease the segregation while

0ina and aluminum have little influence. High internal

gas pr~ssure, developed by the evolution and entrapment

- 5 -

Page 10: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

of dissolved gases du ring solidification, was consi d­

ered to be the cause of inverse segregation. Bailey

(19) showed data proving that the hydro gen solubility

in molten copper depends not only on the temperature,

but also upon the oxygen content of the copper. In

other words, the higher the oxygen content, the lower

the hydrogen solubility. There is a maximum oxygen con­

tent, however, which, if exceeded, lowers the hydrogen

solub iIi ty but l ·tttle. 'Nhen the molten charge contained

hydrogen a greater degree of unsoundness was observed in

sand castings than in chill castings; the apparent ex­

planation is that a chill casting retains more of the

gas in solution than a sand casting.

9. Only those absorbed gases which are sol­

uble in mol ten bronze and whose solub.ili ty increases

with temperature are to be considered as sources of

trouble. Gases absorbed during the melting process

which are soluble in bronze at room temperature natur­

ally will not cause unsoundness or porosity. And, it

seems hi ghly improbablw that insoluble gases could be

held in suspension in molten bronze because of their

bouyancy in liquids.

10. Mold gases which are trapped during the

casti~g and solidification process may come from a num­

ber of possible sources, for example, steam from green

- 6 -

Page 11: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

sand, air held in the pores of the sand, gases from

the interstices of chills, ca rbon ic oxides ori ginat ing

from ignition of carbonaceous mold facing materials

and core compounds, and gaseous hydrocarbons from the

decor.1p osi tion of organic bonding compounds (18). Some

of these gases are dissolved but most of them remain

insoluble in the form of distinct bubbles. If the metal

is too viscous to allow the gases to escape, they will

be retained in the form of blow holes distributed ir­

regularly throughout the casting but often confined to

the surface (7).

11. The formation of tin oxide is considered

by some writers to be harmful in composition "G!1 and

particularly in "M". The lJresence of tin oxide is us­

ually accompani ed by porosity and. loV! tensile strength.

It seems probable that the metallic oxides are reduced

by dry core binding material and produce oxides of

carbon which are trapped with the freezing metal around

the core, under the surface of the casting (18) • . This

trouble is encountered more frequently in bronzes of

high lead content (II).

(c) Intercrystalline Shrinkage Porosity

12. Some writers feel that intercrystalline

shrinkage pDlt'osity is caused by slow or prolonged

- 7 -

Page 12: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

freezing wi th conse quent sluggish feeding of sections.

The copper-tin equilibrium diagram shows an extremely

wide freezing range of ap~roximately l500 C (302 oF) for

a tin content of 9 per cent. During solidification

bronze contracts considerably. Thus the dendrites

which are formed occupy less space than the liquid from

which they are formed and voids are left around them.

If new liquid is available during solidification the

spaces tend to fill, but if, for any reason, the supply

of liquid is cut off, contraction cavities will result.

It is obvious that due to the wide cooling range a con­

siderable depth of metal from the dobling face of the

casting will! ;be freezing at the same time and the feed­

ing liquid will have to traverse a long network of den­

drites to fill the cavities (7,16). Bolton and 1 eigand

(5) stated that the gas rejected in the crystal inter­

stices during crystallization prevents feed back of the

metal and causes shrinkage by preventing feed through

back pressure. Dews (7) stated that cavities are formed

primarily by contraction and while they may provide lodg­

ing places for liberated gases, they are not formed

through any action of the gases.

13. It seems logical that even in the absence

of dissolved gases intercrystalline shrinkage cavities

- 8 -

Page 13: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

may be formed by contra ction during solidifica tion, and

t hat intercrystalline shrinkage p orosity may be con­

trolled by the r ate of solidification. This seems to

point to the importance of casting temperature; for

example, if the cast in g temperature is well ab ove n or­

mal, the contraction during solidification will be great­

er than if cast at a normal temperature. Consequently,

if it is impossible to feed the contraction cavit ies

with liquid metal the unsoundnes s of the resultant cast­

ing will be i ncreased. Karr and Rawdon (2) and

Carpenter and Elam (3) showed that casting temperature

has, through its influence on r a te of solidification, a

greater effect on soundness of composition "G" than any

other factor. Primrose (1) and Thews (15) concluded

that soundness' , ultimate strength, and degree of elonga­

tion depend upon the rate of solidif ication. Smalley

(4) showed that casting at too low a temperature re­

sults in poor physical properties wh ich may be attri­

buted to entrapped oxides and gas and improper fe eding.

14. Since this report is primarily concerned

with the causes for porosity in composition "G" and

with methods of attack for the elimination Oi) pDrosity,

no attempt is being made to discuss in detail those

factors which have only a m1nor influence on porosity.

- 9 -

Page 14: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

However, it seems worthwhile to mention some of the

methods employed to produce sa tisfa ctory castings. The

castings are designed to maintain a ca st finish where

possible and to allow for a minimum amount of machining

when machining is necessary. This procedure does not,

by any means, reduce porosity, but it does t ake advan­

tage of the pressure-tight skin on the surface of the

casting chilled by the mold. From the standp oint of

design and molding there are several important f actors

to be considered, for example, the coring of heavy

bosses, the maintenance of uniform thickness through­

out and the use of ample fillets when changes in sec­

tions or right angle bends are necessary, the selection

of the proper type and size of gates, and the proper

use of chills (9,18). Careful selection of r aw materi­

als and scrap are made to avoid possible contamination

by undesirable elements, gases, or oxides. Melting snd

casting procedures are carefully controlled, and permis­

sible elements, such as nickel (10,13) and phosphorus

(7,8,14) are add ed. These alloying elements are con­

sidered beneficial to the production of pressure cast­

ings when properly used.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

(a) Study of Gas Forosity

• 10-

Page 15: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

The litera ture in general agrees t hat re-

ducing gases are a source of porosity in composition "G"

castings, although there is a difference of opinion in

regard to the gas or group of gases whi ch may be con­

tained in the raw materials or scrap, or which may be

absorbed during the melting process and evolved during

solidification. In view of this, the following experi-

men ts were performed to deterrnine the effect on porosity

in composition "G" of the various gases which might be

present in the atmosphere during melting.

16. Some experimental melts were made in vacuo

to determine the feasibility of using virgin metals in

the proper proportions for composition "G". Consider-

able difficulty was experienced in retaining the zinc

in the molten metal. The zinc which vaporized was car-

ried off through the vacuum system and it was deposited

along the way as it became cool enough to condense. tn

order to avoid this loss of zinc the following procedur~

was devised which proved to be qui t ·e satisfactory for

the entire series of experiments.

17. A preliminary melt which contained more

than the desired amount of zinc was sand cast. Three-

pound specimens cut from the preliminary melt were

vacuum melted in a graphite crucible and remelted in

a graphite crucible under certain controlled gas atmos.

- 11 -

Page 16: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

pheres. A different specimen was melted under each of

the following gas atmospheres: hydro gen, water vapor,

air, sulphur dioxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen ,

and carbon monoxide. The excess zinc was purposely add­

ed to the preliminary melt to compensate for zinc losses

which occurred durin g vacumm melting. It is to be noted

that the s pecimens cut from the preliminary melt were

melted in vacuo before melting under controlled gas a t­

mospheres. This procedure was followed because it was

felt that the sand cast specimens might contain certain

gases or oxides wh ich would influepce results when melt­

ing under controlled gas a tmospheres. In other words,

by following this procedure all s pecimens were brought

to a standard quality and thus the results obtained after

melting under different gas atmospheres were compar able.

18. The preliminary melt was made of virgin

metals in a high frequency lift coil induction furnace

using a No. 60 semi-conducting crucible having a capac­

ity for 180 pounds of bronze. The metal was cast at

l140 0 C (20840 F) into a green sand mold. The resultant

casting weighed approximately 117 pounds including gates

and risers. The main body of the casting consisted of

three cylinders, each 1-3/4 inches in diameter and 30

inches long. The casting was sand-blasted. thoroughly

- 12 -

Page 17: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

clean ed, and cut i nto lengths ea ch wei ghing about 3

pounds. The chemical analysis of a representative sam­

ple of the alloy showed t hat it contained 85.52 per cent

copper, 8.71 per cent tin, 0.75 per cent nickel, and 4.73

per cent zinc.

19. In order to arrive at the desired zinc con­

tent (3 per cent) the specimens were weighed before and

after vacuum melting and the loss in wei ght t aken as loss

of zinc. By this method the approximate zinc content

could be calculated. The charge was remelted if the zinc

content was too high and discarded if too low.

20. Melting in vacuo and under controlled gas

atmospheres was done in graphite crucibles machined out

of Acheson graphite electric arc furnace electrodes, four

inches in diameter. The crucibles were 2-1/2 inches out­

side diameter, 5 inches overall length , 2 i nches i n side

diameter at the top, tapered 4-1/2 inch es in length to

1-3/4 inches inside diameter at the bottom. A graphite

hopper 5 inches overall length was placed over the cru­

cible so tha t the entire charge could be loaded at once,

thereby preventing interruptions when melting, A graphite

lid was placed over the hopper. Both the lid and the hop­

p er also served to eliminate drastic temperature gradients

during solidification. The crucible, hopper, and lid were

- 13 -

Page 18: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

placed in a quartz tube closed at one end, 12 i nches

long, 3-1/2 inches outside diameter, and 1/8 inch wall

t hi ckn ess . A water-cooled bronze cap was fitted to t he

open end of the quartz tube and sealed with a rubber

gas ket. The cap had t wo convenien t openings, one of

which was closed when melting under vacuum, and when

melting under gas atmo spheres one opening was used a s

an inlet and the other a s an outlet . A h i gh frequency

induction furnace was used for melting and a Beach-Russ

two-stage ~otary oil pump was used to produce the vacuum.

The total time for a vacuum melt was 60 minutes - 30 min­

utes for evacuating the furnace, 25 minutes to melt the

char ge, and the char ge was held 5 minutes in the molten

condition after which the power was cut off and the metal

allowed to cool to room temp erature in vacuo.

21. The procedure for melting under gas atmos­

pheres was as follows. Commercial grades of hydro gen,

sulphur diox ide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen,and oxygen were

employed. In order to insure their purity the gases were

chemically treated to remove those i mpurities which might

influence results. Hydrogen was passed over palladiumiz­

ed pumice at 1000C (2l20 F) to convert oxygen to water

vapor. It was then passed through concentrated sulphuric

acid and calcium ch~oride to remove the water vapor before

- 14 -

Page 19: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

entering the enclosed heating chamber. Sulphur dioxide

received no special treatment. Carbon diox ide was passed

over calcium chloride. Nitrogen was passed over copper

filings at 600 0 0 (1112 0 F), through concentrated sulphur­

ic acid, and over calcium chloride in the ' order named.

Oxygen was bubbled through a cuprous chloride solution

to remove ca rbon monoxide, and then over calcium chloride

to remove water vapor. Water vapor was pro duced by run­

ning steam generated by boiling water through the heating

chamber. Carbon monoxide was produced by continuously

dropping concentrated formic acid into concentrated sul­

phuric acid. Any acid fumes and water vapor carried

with the carbon monoxide were removed by passing through

concentrated sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride. In

all cases, excepting the melt in air, the exhaust gas

was bubbled through water to maintain a constant pres­

sure and to prevent suction of air into the system

should a drop in internal pressure occur.

22. The flow of gas was maintained for at

least tht±ty minutes before starting the furnace and

was continued until the metal cooled to room temperature.

The metal was held molten for thirty minutes reaching a

maximum temperature of approximately 11000C (20l2oF).

It solidified in about fifteen minutes and cooled to

- 15 -

Page 20: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

room temperature in three hours. The resultant speci­

mens were h alved lengthwise through the diameter,

polished, and photographed. Density determina tions

and chemical analyses were made.

(b) Study of Intercrystalline Shrinkage Porosity

Effect of a lloying el ements

23. In studying gas porosity , cavit i es were

observed even in s pecimens melted in vacuo prior to

melting under controlled gas atmospheres. Assuming

that by melting in vacuo no gases would be present, it

seems rea sonable to deduce t hat some other factor ceased

the porosity. Therefore, it was felt that this type of

porosity might be natural for cast composition "GlY and

that some alloying element or elements were the contri-

buting factors.

24. To prove this, the following experiments

were performed. Five vacuum melts were made using the

set-up described in paragraph 20. Virgin metals of

high purity were used for a 3-pound charge of each com­

position shown in Plate 2. It is to be noted that in -

each successive charge copper is substituted for by one

or more elements comprising composition "G", and that

the last charge is the alloy itself. The specimens

were processed in the manner outlin~d in paragraph 20.

- 16 -

Page 21: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Influence of pouring temperatures

25. The inportance of pouring temperatures ,

often referred to as casting temperatures, was empha­

sized in the literature. Some experiment s were under­

taken to confirm sta tement s i n the literature, while

others were made to determine the relationship between

pouring temperatures and soundness, tensile strength ,

and elongation.

26. Five heats, numbered from 22 to 26 i nclu­

sive, were run. Two were composition "G" containing no

nickel, t wo were composi tion n G" containing the nominal

ni ckel percentage, and one was a modification of com­

position "G" in which 6 per cent nickel wa s substituted

for 6 per cent tin. The composition of each heat is

shown in Fi gure 3. The melting was done in an Ajax­

Northrup lift coil type i nduction furnace having a ca­

pacity for a No. 70 crucible. Seventy-pound charges

were melted in a No. 40 crucible. Each charge consisted

of 30 per cent scrap and the balance virgin metal.

Nickel wa s added in the form of a 50 per cent copper and

50 per cent nickel ma ster alloy. The scrap metal, copper­

nickel master alloy, and virgin copper were melted first.

The molten metal was covered with charcoal and heated

above t h e initial pouring temp erature. The tin was added

- 17 -

Page 22: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

followed by zinc. The crucible was removed from the

furnace, the metal cooled to the desired pouring tem­

perature, and cast.

27. Details of the casting are shown in

Plate 11 and Plate 12, Figure 1. The molds were made

of No. 0 Albany green sand containing from 7 to 8 per

cent moisture. The tensile test sp ecimens were cut

from each casting and density determinations were made

on each specimen before roaching to 0.505 inch diameter.

(c) Hydraulic Pressure Testing

28. An attempt was made to correlate pressure

tightness wi th density by first determining denSities of

hollow cylinder castings as cast and as machined to size

and then subjecting them to hydraulic pressure. Two

melts were made in a No. 60 semi-conducting cru.cible,

using the same equipment and following the same melting

and casting procedure outlined in paragraph 26. Compo­

sit ion ffG" containing no nickel was used. The details

of the hollow cylinder casting are shown in Plate 10 and

12, Figure 2. The hollow cylinders were machined to 2-

1/2 inches outside diameter, 2-1/4 inches inside diameter,

and 4 inches length for testing, the excess length being

cut off the top section of the cast cylinder. Plate 13

shows the device used for hydraulic pressure testing.

- 18 ,-

Page 23: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

(d) Density Determinations, Voids and Soundness

Calculations

29. Observed density val u.es were determined

by the conventional displacement of water method. The

values obtained were at 20 0 C (6SoF). It was found

that densities of small samples taken from va.rious sec­

tions of a casting varied considerably. Therefore, in

all cases ob s erved densities of the entire specimens

were measured. In other words, in determining the den­

sity of a tensile test specimen the whole specimen was

weighed in air and in water and the density computed.

This gave an average observed density value for the

tensile test specimen. The same procedure was followed

in density determinations of hollow cylinder castings,

and specimens obtained from vacuum and controlled gas

atmosphere experiments. In order to calculate per cent

voids or per cent soundness, it was necessary to deter­

mine the maximum densities of the alloys studied.

Specimens of each alloy were cut into one-inch cubes,

and cold compressed and annealed until maximum and con­

stant density values were obtained. Three methods of

determining density were used: (1) displacement of

water, (2) weighing a known volume in air, the volume

determined by measuring the dimensions with a micrometer

- 19 -

Page 24: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

ca liper, and (3) X-ray diff r action. The results obtain-

ed from the latter were used, since they were more con­

sistent than the results obtained from the others.

Table 4 lists the alloys studied and the corresponding

maximum density values.

30. Before leaving the subject of density de­

terminations, a few words should be included in regard to

densitY ,as a measure of porosity or unsoundness. If a

casting or specimen has a denSity equal to the maximum

denSity, it can be said that the specimen is 100 per cent

sound or contains zero per cent voids. On the other hand,

if the denSity is less it is obvious that the speCimen is

not 100 per cent sound and necessarily contains a certain

p ercentage of voids to make up for the volume occupied.

In other words, the observed density of a specimen is an

indication of its soundness or porosity. The maximum ,

density varies, of course, with the composition. Thus

in presenting data showing the effects of variations in

co mposition or the effects of other variables on poros­

ity, observed denSity values must be compared with the

maximum denSity obtainable for the particular composi­

tion, The percentage of voids may be computed from the

following formula.

Voids, per cent D D 'b = max. - 0 s. x 100 DIIlax.

- 20 -

Page 25: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Dmax. is t he maxi mum density and Dobs • is the observed

density as described in ps ragraph 29. The figures

shown as soundness (per cent) were determined by sub­

tracting voids (p er cent) from 100. Thus a perfectly

sound casting would be 100 per cent sound, and a cast­

ing contain ing 10 per cent voids would be 90 per cent

sound.

TIrSCUSSION OF RESULTS

(a) Study of Gas Porosity

31. The chart in Plate 1 represents the data

obtained from the study of ga. s porosity described in pre­

ceding paragraphs. Hydro gen and water vapor caused the

most pnrosity, sulphur dioxide and a ir followed wi th a

decided drop in porosity, and carbon dioxide, nitrogen,

oxygen, and carbon monoxide caused porosity in the order

given with carbon monoxide causing the least. It is in­

teresting to note the relative positions of the t wo bars

marked "Leaky Castings." They represent hollow cylinder

castings having the least porosity of 24 tested which

leaked when SUbjected to the hydraulic pressure test.

In other words, a further reduction of porosity seems

necessary to obtain pressure-tight castings.

32. This discussion covers only the possi­

bility of porosity caused by gases absorbed from the

- 21 -

Page 26: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

ma teria l s or duri ng the melting process and precipita ted

durin g solidifica tion . There is another t ype of ga s

porosity which may occur during the ca st i ng and solidifi­

ca tion processes . This is in the form of occluded gase s

wh ich appear ne ar t he skin of the ca sting only and are

probably a result of insoluble ga ses formed by hot metal

contacting the sand mold surfaces and which are trapped

iuring solidification. These may b e almost any of the

gases discusses, and although such blowholes are unde­

sira ble, they a re not too serious a defect if other f ac­

tors governing porosity are properly controlled, since

this type of porosity is usually found near the casting

surface only and not throughout the cast i ng . Thus , if

the balance of the c a sting is sound, it would be diffi­

cult to force liquid through the cast ing if the channels

formed by a series of cavities · are absent.

33. Porosity found throughout a casting might

result from precipitated gas which was dissolved prior

to casting , and obviously c an cause leakage, particularly

if the porosity is of such magnitude to provide conven­

ient channels for the liquid or gas. It is interesting

to consider in detail some aspects of absorbed gas po­

rosity which are included in Plate 1. The melt repre­

sented by the b ar ma rked "Vacuum" (melted only under

- 22 - -

Page 27: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

vacuum) can be assumed to be free of gas. By melting

under vacuum in a graphite crucible metallic oxides

would be reduced to oxides of carbon, and these gases

and others, if present, would be removed through the

vacuum sy stem. Even though the "Vacuum" melt is gas­

free it has a certain amount of porosity (indicated by

the per cent voids or per cent soundness of the metal)

due to some other cause. Since the specimen was pre­

pared under carefully controlled conditions all vari­

ables, including gas, were eliminated. Therefore, the

other cause for porosity can only be attributed to in­

tercrystalline shrinkage which will be discussed later.

If it is assumed that "Vacuum" has zero gas porosi~y,

then a line drawn parallel to the horizontal axis in

Plate 1 through the uppermost point of the bar ma~ked

"Vacuum" will be the zero point for gas porosity for

all of the gas melts. The bar "Vacuum" has two upper­

most points one shaded and the other unshaded which

were determined by using maximum density values obtained

by different methods mentioned above. If a line is

drawn through either point, comparisons must be made

with corresponding points on bars representing soundness

of the various gases. If the dotted line AA' is consid­

ered as the zero gas porosity line the effect of the

~ 23 -

Page 28: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

various gases on porosity is more noticeable. Carbon

monoxide seems to ha ve no effect and can be conside r ed

as either insoluble or soluble from room temperature to

lloooe (20l2 0F). The former is ~robably correct. Oxy­

gen, nitrogen, c arbon dioxide , sul-phur dioxide, and air

show gradual increases i n porosity due to gas. The per

cent voids of specimens melted under water vapor and

hydro gen is more than t wice that of the vacuum melted

specimen, indicating a marked influence of these two

gases on porosity. \!ater vapor probably breaks down to

form oxygen and free hydrogen, and it is quite likely

that hydrogen alone is dissolved in the molten metal

and precipitates during solidification to cause porosi ty.

34. Table I shows the chemical composition

and heat numbers of the specimens charted in Plate 1.

Plates 7 and 8 show cross-sectional photographs of the

s p ecimens charted in Plate 1. The effect of hydrogen

and water vapor on porosity is obvious. A number of

small cavities are evident in the specimens melted un­

der air and sulphur dioxide. There is no apparent ef­

fect of carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon

dioxide on p orosity. The chemical analysis of the speci­

men melted under sulphur dioxide Shows 0.10 ~er cent

sulphur which was p icked up during the melting process.

- 24 -

Page 29: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Examination under the microscope revea led the presence of

sulphides which seemed to have no bearing on porosity.

35. Before leaving the discussion of gas poros­

ity , a short discussion of the practical application of

these findings to foundry pr actices is in order. Virgin

metals and scrap used in making the alloys are possible

sources of gases, which may be carried over from previous

refining or melting operations. Furthermore, they may

come from mOisture, oil, or corrosion products on the sur­

f ace of the materials. Some or all of these, when heated,

may ultimately break down to water vapor or hydrogen or

both, and become absorbed by the mo~ten metal. Furnace

atmospheres in coal or coke fired natural draught pit

type furnaces, oil, gas, or induction furnaces, may have

hydrogen or water vapor present. Bailey (19) presented

a chart Showing gas atmospheres for a number of differ­

ent types of copper melting furnaces including some of

those mentioned above which showed that in most cases the

hydrogen content varied between 0.0 and 2.0 per cent, but

the water vapor was much higher, in one case having as

much as 20.7 per cent. If the fluxes, deoxidizers, or

charcoal contain mOisture, they also may be sources of

gas porosity.

36. In view of the similarity in chemical com-

- 25 -

Page 30: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

positions between compositions "Mil and "G" it is very

probable that the results obtained from the study of gas

porosity on composition "GIf c.an be applied to composition

"M".

(b) study of Intercrystalline Shrinkage Porosity

Effect of alloying elements

37. Pl a te 2 shows the ~er cent voids and per

cent soundness of a series of five alloys melted, sol­

idified, and cooled in a graphite crucible in vacuo.

The relatively low percentage of voids found in the first

three alloys from the left side of the chart is worthy of

note. These alloys do not contain tin. The percentage

of voids found in the fourth and fifth alloys from the

left side of the chart ranges from 4 to 30 times as much

as the first three alloys. It is to be noted that the

fourth and fifth alloys contain tin and that the fifth is

composition nGlI.

38. Cross-sectional photographs of these alloys

are shown in Plate 9. The alloys having low percentage of

voids and no tin show a pipe in the center of the speci­

men, while the alloys containing tin and having a high per­

centage of voids show no pipe whatsoever. It is obvious

that the shrinkage in the alloys showing the pipe is ex­

ternal as evidenced by the pipe, whereas in the alloys

.. 26 -

Page 31: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

cont a i n i ng tin, no external shrinkage is evi dent. Con ­

sequently , since some shrinkage has to t ake pl a ce, it

can be a s s ume d to be i n te rnal i n t he form of minute cav­

ities. This is verif ied by the f a ct tha t the nercentage

of voids is rel atively high and that minute cavities are

discernible under the microscope.

39. In view of the results obt a i ned f rom t hes e

data it seems that rega rdless of precise fo undry control,

it is impossible to manufacture castings entirely free of

voids or porosity. It remains to be proved by hydraulic

testing whether or not it is necessary for castings to be

free of porosity if they are to be pressure-tight. How­

ever, it must be borne in mind t ha t this f actor is a nat­

ural phenomenon which cannot be easily cont rolled and pre­

sents a considerable handicap in the manufacture of pres-­

·sure ;;;. t~gb.t castings.

Influence of pouring temperatures

40. Plate 3 shows the influence of pouring tem­

perature on soundness for three compositions. Two are

essentially composition nG", one with and one without

nic kel. The third composition is a modification of com­

position "G" in which 6 per cent nickel is substituted

for 6 per cent tin. Since the element tin has been shown

to be a cause of intercrystalline or internal porosity in

composition "Gil, it was felt that by substituting some

- 27 -

Page 32: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

other element for tin, internal porOSity could be reduced.

The substitution of nickel was made ~rimarily to decrease

intercrystalline shrinkage porOSity and at the same time

retain or improve all of the physical and corrosion re­

sistant properties for which composition "G" is noted.

41. There are further advantages in substitut­

ing other elements for tin. In view of the present war

conditions a satisfactory substitute for tin, a strategic

material, would be an important development. In the case

of the modified co~position nG" in which 6 per cent nickel

was substituted for 6 per cent tin the cost of the alloy

would be lowered since tin costs roughly twice as much as

nickel.

42. From the two curves in Plate 3 representing

composition "G" two important observations can be made:

(1) soundness increases rapidly as the temperature de­

creases to l1500 C (20l2 0 F) and is constant at lower tem­

peratures; (2)" the presence of 0.6 to 0.7 per cent nickel

shows higher soundness at l150 0 C and under, although the

pouring temperatures above l1500 C seem to be more critical.

Pouring temperatur e has 3 little influence on soundness of

the modified composition "G" alloy containing 6 per cent

nickel.

43. In Plate 4 pouring temperature is plotted

- 28 -

Page 33: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

against nhysical properties. Again the drastic effect

of pouring temperatures is to be noted on composition

"G". As the temperatures drop to 1150 0 C, the physical

properties increase sharply, and as the temperature

drops below 11500 C, the physical p roperties decrease.

The physical properties of the modified composition "G"

decrease with pouring temperature, but the change is

not sharp, nor is there a critical pouring temperature.

44. Plate -3 and Plate 4 are combined in Plate

5 with soundness plotted versus tensile strength and the

pouring temperatures inserted at each point on the curves.

The curves representing composition "G" show maximum ten­

sile strength and soundness at a critical pouring temper­

ature. Composition "G" containing from 0.6 to 0.7 per

cent nickel shows improvement in soundness over composi­

tion "G" containing zero per cent nickel with no apparent

change in tensile strength. The modified composition "G"

alloy shows relatively little change in soundness with

pouring temperature, although some loss in tensile

strength is to be noted with lower pouring temperatures.

However, the tensile strength values on the whole are

equivalent to or higher than the maximum tensile strength

values obtained on composition "G". Table 2 shows the

data used for preparing Plates 3, ~, and 5. In addition,

- 29 -

Page 34: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

the average density of each specimen is included.

45. From the observat i on made on the curves

(Plates 3, 4, and 5), t he importance of accurately con­

trolling pouring temperatures of composition UGlY in the

foundry can be apprecia ted. In order to obta i n maxi­

mum soundness and maxi mum physica l properties a cas ting

has to be poured wi t hin a very narrow temperat ure r ange .

In view of the similarity of composition "G" and combO­

sition "Mll it would seem that pending further investi­

gation of the latter alloy, the effect of pouring tem­

peratures would be relatively the same. The modified

composition " Gil containing 6 per cent nickel does not

seen to be affected by pouring temperatures.

be due to the lower tin content of the alloy.

This may

An alloy

of this type would be of considerable help to the found­

ry since it would eliminate one of the important factors

in the manufacture of pressure-tight castings by remov­

ing the critical relationship between porOSity and pour­

ing temperatureo

(c) Hydraulic Pressure Testing

46. Table 3 shows the data obtained from the

hydraulic pressure tests. It is to be noted that only

one specimen, lOA, satisfactorily withstood pressure.

The balance leaked at 100 pounds pressure or less. Some

... 30 ...

Page 35: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

of the other specimens had a higher soundness value than

lOA but leaked when tested. Because of the deviation of

results no de~inite conclusions were drawn. Further work

is contemplated on this type of testing with a view to the

correlation o~ per cent soundness with pressure tightness.

It is felt that some changes in the design of the test

casting will be necessary be~ore satisfactory results can

be obtained. Gardner and Saeger (20) conducted similar

hydraulic pressure tests on cast red brass (85 per cent

copper, 5 per cent zinc, 5 per cent tin, and 5 per cent

lead) with fairly good results. Plate 6 shows the effect

on soundness of two differently shaped and designed cast­

ings of identical composition.

SUMl~RY A1m CONCLUSIONS

47. Tin causes intercrystalline shrinkage poros­

ity in composition "G". This obviously suggests a change

in composition or perhaps even a substitution of other

alloying elements for tin.

48. Hydrogen and water vapor cause gas porosity

in composition "G". Sulphur dioxide seems to have a minor

deleterious e~fect, while carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen,

and carbon monoxide cause little, if any, gas porOSity.

49. Improper pouring temperatures cause porosity

in composition "G". Maximum soundness and physical prop-. - 31 -

Page 36: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

erties can only be obtained within a very narrow pour­

ing temperature range , which is difficult to control in

actual foundry practice.

50. Modified composition "G" , in which 6 per

cent nickel is substituted for 6 per cent tin, decreases

the effect of pouring temperatur e on soundness and phys­

ical properties. In other words, high soundness values

and go od physical properties can be obtained over a wi de

pouring temperature range, which should aid considerably

in the production of pressure castings.

51. Design and shape of casting influences

s OIlndne s s •

- 32 -

Page 37: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

BI BL IO GRAPHY

(1) H. S. Primro s e, "Metallography as an

Aid to the Brass-founder," Journal,

Institute of Metals, Vol. 4, pp.248-

256, (1910).

(2) C. P. Karr and H. S. Rawdon, "Sta.ndard

Test Specimens of Zinc Bronze ( 88-10-

2) , Tf U. S. Bureau of Standards, Technical

Paper No. 59, Vol. 6, (1916).

( 3 ) H.C.H. Carpenter and C. F. Elam, "An

I nvesti gation of Unsound Castings of

Admiralty Bronze (88-10-2): Its Cause

and the Remedy," Journal, Institute of

Metals, Vol. 19, pp. 155-175, (1918).

(4) O. Sma.lley, "Influence of Cored Structure,1l

Journal, Society of Chemical Industry,

Vol. 37, p. 191, (1918).

(5) J. W. Bolton and S. A. Weigand, "Incipient

Shrinkage in Some Non-Ferrous Alloys,lf

Transactions, A.I.M.E., Institute of Metals

Div., Vol. 83, pp. 475-491, (1929).

- 33 -

Page 38: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

\

(6) E. J. Daniels, TlUnsoun dness in Bronze

Castings," Journal of the Institute of

Metals, Vol. 43, pp. 125-142, (19 30).

(7) H. C. Dews, "The Metallurgy of Bronze,"

London, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Ltd.,

(1930 )

(8) H. C. Dews, "The Effect of Phosphorus on

the Strength of Admiralty Gun Metal,"

Journal, Institute of Metals, Vol. 44,

pp. 255-266, (19 30).

(9) J. E. Crown, "Bronze Pressure Castings,"

Transactions, A.F.A., Vol. 39, No.4,

pp. 496 -503, (1931 ) •

(10) N. B. Pilling and T. E. Kih1gren, "Some

Effects of Nickel on Bronze Foundry Mix­

tures," Tran sactions, A.F.A., Vol. 39,

pp. 93-113, (1931).

(11) E. Doughty, "OXidation, A Cause of Porosity

in Leaded Bronze," Metals and Alloys, Vol.

2, pp. 181-183, October (1931).

(12) G. L. Bailey, "Deoxidizers and Fluxes,"

The Metal Industry (London), Vol. 40,

No.2, pp.31-34, and No.4, pp. 123-125,

(1932) •

- 34- -

Page 39: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

(13 ) N. B. Pi l ling and T. E. Ki hl gren, "Casting

Properties of Nickel Bronz es,lT Tr ans actions,

A. F .A., Vol. 40, pp. 289-305, (1932).

( 14) L. H. Fawcett , "Propert i es of Bronze ( 88 -

10-2 and ·88 .. 8 _~: -4) ,IT National Metals Handb ook ,

A. S.S. T., Cleveland, p . 1211, (19 33).

(15) E. R. Thews, · "Pouring Tempera t ures of

Bronzes," The Foundry, Vol. 62, March, p . 24;

April, p. 24, (1934).

(16 } N. P. Allen and S. H. Puddepha.t, "Observa­

tions of t he Porosity and Segrega.tion of

Two Br onze I ngots, " J our nal , Institute of

Metals, Vol. 27, pp . 79-86, (1935).

(17) W. Claus and R. W. Bauer, "Inverse Segre ga­

tion and Ga s S olubi~ ity in Tin Bron zes,"

Metallwirtschaft, Vol. 15, pp. 587-600,

June 26,(1936).

(18) F . G. Jenkins, "Zinc Bronze - Composi tion

'G'," Metals and Alloys, Vol. 7, pp. 279-

286, (1936).

(19) G. L. Bailey, "Effect of Melting Conditions

on Gas Unsoundness in Metals," Foundry Tra de

Journal, Vol. 60, June 29, pp. 576-578, and

July 6, pp. 9-10, !1939)

- 35 ...

Page 40: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

' (20) H. B. Gardner and C. M. Saeger, Jr., "The

Effects of Antimony and Aluminum on Cer­

tain Pro~erties of Cast Red Br ass,"

Transactions, A. F . A., pp . 423-443, De- ­

cember, (1939).

- -36 -

Page 41: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

TABLE 1

Chemical Analysis of Alloys Mel ted Under Gas Atmospheres

(See Pl ate 1)

Gas Heat At mosphere Number %Cu foSn %Zn foN i 10S Vacuum 9 87 .15 9.15 2.76 0.75

CO 16 87.35 9.16 2.63 0.75

02 18 87.43 9.00 2.59 0.75

N2 19 87.41 8.96 2.79 0.75

CO 2 13 87.09 9.03 2.98 0.75

S02 14 87.09 8.96 2.80 0.75 0.10

Air 15 86.89 9.27 2.83 0.'74

H2O 1'7 8'7.23 8.89 2.78 0.'75

H2 12 8'7.36 9.14 2.70 0.'75

Leaky 20 87.23 8.81 3.66

Ca.stings 21 87.78 8.95 2.84

Page 42: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Specimen No.

1 2 3

4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15

Note:

Hea.t

TABLE 2

Effect of Pouring Tempera ture on Va rious Physical Pro~erties

Pouring Average Percent Number Temper- Density Sound-

grus ./c .c. ature ness o t} at 20 0 C*

22 1240 8.536 95.6 " 1150 8.639 96.8 IT 1050 8.623 96.6

23 1280 8.331 93.3 " 1175 8.531 95.6 IT 1050 8.674 97.2

24 1290 8.014 90.1 11 1160 8.597 96.6 " _ 1050 8.780 98.7

25 1300 7.928 88.9 " 1140 8.795 98.6 " 1050 8.762 98.2

26 1325 8.728 97.8

" 1200 8.736 97.9

" 1100 8.704 97.5

Ten sile Strength Ibs/sq.

in*

33,100 41,700 30,300

24,900 36,400 33,200

26,300 40,500 31,000

27,400 41,800 26,400

42,500 41,500 37,800

* represents average of two specimens tested.

Elong-ation % in 2 in. *

10.2 25.8 4.7

8.6

6.3

7.0 15.6 6.3

5.5 18.8 4.3

38.6 30.1 24.2

Page 43: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

Pouring Speci­Temper- men a. ture No.

°c 1300

IT

IT

IT

1210 "

1200 IT

1125 "

1110 n

1050 " " "

lA IB 6A 6B

2A 2B

8A 8B

lOA lOB

3A 3B

4A 4B

12A 12B

TABLE 3

Hydraulic Pressure Testing Data on Hollow Cylinder Specimens

(Composition TfG")

Chemical Analysi s:

Hea t No . 20 Heat No. 21

10 Copper

8 7.2 87 . 8

~s Tin

8 . 8 9 . 0

% Zi n c

3 .7 2.8

As Cast Den sity Percent at 20°C Sound­gms./c.c. ness

Machined Pressure Test

8.148 8.170 7.761 7.753

8.309 8.285

8.493 8.465

8.531 8.534

8 .463 8 . 4 71

8.440 8.428 8 .572 8.549

91.3 91.6 87.0 86 .9

9 3 .1 92.9

95.2 94.9

95.6 95.7

94.9 95.0

94.6 94.5 96.1 95.8

Densi~y Percent at 20 C Sound-gms./c.c. ness 100 lb. 600 lb.

7.958 8.080

7.464

8 .129 8.023

8.340

8.319 8.346

8.389 8.284

8.366 8;'428 8.374 8.343

89.2 90.6

83.7

91.1 89.9

93.5

93.2 93.5

93.8 92.9

93.8 94.3 93.9 93.5

NG NG

NG

NG NG

NG

OK NG

NG NG

G NG NG NG

OK

* Only s p ecimens withstanding 100 lb. p er sq. in. p ressure were tested at 600 lb. ~er sq. in. p ressure.

NOTE : SpeCimens numbered l A , lB. 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4A and 4B were tak en from Heat No. 20, and sp ecimens numbered 6A, 6B. 8A, 8B, lOA, lOB, 12A , and 12B were tak en from Heat No. 21.

Page 44: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

TABLE 4

Maximum Density Values

Chemical Compositions Max . Density

C1J, Cu %Zn foSn foN i X-Ray Di ffr action

Method ""--

8'7.4 2.9 9.6 0.0 8.928 gIns ./e.c.

8'7.4 3.1 9.5 0.0 8.928 n " 85.8" 3 . 3 10.2 0.'7 8.900 IT If

8'7.4 2.9 9.1 0.6 8.922 " " 88.2 2.8 3.1 5.9 8.928 n "

Page 45: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

93

94

98

99

100

EFFECT ON50tlNlJN£55 or MELTING AND 50LIOIFYINO COMP051TION (} " UNOER VARIOt/5 GAS ATM05PHERE5

PERCENT VOltJS OETERMINEO BV USIIYG X-RAY ill METHOD O£N5I TV VALUES .

PERCENT VOltJ5 DETERMINED BY U51NG tJl.5PLACEM£IYT OF WATER METHOD OENSITY VALUE5 ,.

VACUUM CO

GA5 ATMOSPHERES

PLATEl

Page 46: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

95 5

96 4

h... 97 3

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~' 98 ~ 2 ~ ~

tr)

~ ~ ~ ~

99 /

100 o

EFfzer or ELEMENT5 U5EIJ I/Y COMPOJlrlO/'I (;"0# 50U'1YL7/YE55

PERCENT VOIlJ5 DETERMINEO BY U51NG A-RAY METHOD DENSITV VALUES

PERCE/V! YOILJ5 IJETEI?MI/(EO BV USINu' LJI5PLAC£MEI'IT OF W/1T£R METHOO D£N5ITV VALU£5

ALLOY5 WERE VACUUM MELTED

I

I

I

---------I-- ----- ~------- --1-------- --------_.- _._---- ----

---.----~ -------L-· -.-._ --

i I

% ctJ % /(1

% z/V % 51'1

I

I

-f------L.

~ 100

r-: h

99.2 0.8

f ~ ~ v

962 0.8 3.0

-

r /

V

~

v ~ ~ [;;

v 900 08

92

COMP051TIOIY OF ALLOY5

f- --

~ ~ ~ v v

- f7" 1--------

~ ~ r; ~ r; / "/

~ ~ ~ r; V v

872 0.8 2.8 9.2

PLATE 2

Page 47: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

EFFEC T OF P OUx l/'IG TEMPERATURE OIY 50U/'IIJIY£ 55 OF COMP05I TIOIY'''G '/lNIJ THE INFLUENCE OF NICKEL.

POURING TEMPERATUR~ fJE6RE£5 F 1832 POI? 2192 2372 2552

IOO r---~------~--------~--------~------~--~

I I ! ~--+-,. I !

I • ! \ i I 98 ----;------~=--======j:! ==;;~~. -9-%-M-/-r---j

I

96 ---r-·--··---- ! -- ---~\ _L. ____ _ _ __ :--------- --e\ I 0 I

I \{ I

.. -.. -... -L------ ___ . \ I I ~ 94 I - :- \~- --n---~ 9~ I J I \ 00%1'1/ 'ON I ( r.,' L.. I .- ---.--. - '-'-- '--, -- \ --+---;-.-----r--, ~ : I \ ~ \\

~ \\

~ 90 f---._-f--.--_ .. - . ~r------ --\ I

\ I~

\06-07%IVI G" 88 ._- -.--.------1----- -+----- +----.- - +---1

ilEAl CHEMICAL AIVALV515 P£RC£IYT

NO. Cu ZrI 5n N/~ 86 - . . ---~ -2...L Jl.Z4:. f- ?9_ 9 6 __ ... _ _ ._ .. ____________ _ ..

e .... -?Lr!i 71.. 3 I 9 5 f..---...

o 24 858 3.3 10.2 07 ----_ . _ .. ---

• 25 8 74 2 9 9./ (}6 -ffi 26 88 2 28 -:iT 59

84 L---~1---------L--------~------~--------~~ 1000 liDO IcOO 1300 1400

POI/RI/'I{l TEMPERATtJR£; IJEOREE5 C

PLATF 3

Page 48: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

~

~ ~ 30 ~ I\.i

$ ~

~ \.S 20 ~ l!-J ~,

~' ~ ~

10 ~ ~ 'J ~

0

~ )0::.

::::::

~ ~ ~ \.J

~

~

E FFECT or p o t//?//iO T£ M ? £ RATUI?£ ON PIIY51CAL P.ROP£Ir' TlES or (;tJ/v1P05ITION 'C;"'AIV!) T/iE //VFL {/,cIVC£ or IYIC}{£L

?Ot//i'//y6 T£/VIPERA TURf:; !)£GREE 5 r-18.32 c Ole: 2192 23 72 2552

42.5 ---.-- --1---- .. --- _.-- .. -:-.-- -.. 5.9 % N t: _ ----1;-,'---.. - .- ---' -/----

400 ----'- ---_.----- .- .. 'EAT CHEMICAL AIVAL Y51S

P f RCE IY T

NO Cu Zn .:in ;V;

o 22 874 I 2. 9 96 r-~--+-__r--~_+---,

• 23 8'1 4 ' 31 95 - -. -- ---1------;

o 2...1. 858. .J 3 10 2. 0 7 • 2~74 2.9 9 1 0.6 ED 260'8 2 12 8 .3. 1 5 9

I I

-- Tf IV5/1..£ STI?£ NGTIf ---- £L ONGA T IO/'l ~

~ 350 .---.-- --------- -_·----t- .--- --- -- I

~

250

I fi S.9 % N/

I

. Oo. (2~qI

---'----1000 liDO 1200 /3 00 14 00

P{}(//?I/y6' T£MP[I?ATU/r~, lJ£&R£E5 C

PLATE 4

Page 49: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

I?[LA TIOIVS/iIP BETWEEN TENSILE 5TR£!Y6TI( 50LlIY.oNE5~ ANO POt/I?IN6 TEMP£RATU!?I:." ANO 7?1£ INrI.. V£IVCE OF /yICKEI.. Ok TII£5£ FACTO/?5 I N CO/v/POSITION '(:;' ''

~------~~------~--------~--------~--------~----.-----

i I I i W"-L-A-T--'·I'-:CH.-~-r/-Y1-/{'-"'A·!..--A-W,-r.A-L-Y:-:5--I5· ! ! 1325 i

4L?5 - .-- --- . I PERC'Llv T _u_+ I -------- -~ r--·---------IY () C u ' Z,,j.5 " -Lv,:--! I 1/50 ~, _ , 1140

o 22 874 ?9_ ~--~€J.--- I i /' /' /' ;120° 1

- ~--r-? 3 874 _~:.Ll {!.5 -t- ----- I !116U r I I o 24 858 3_3 1/02 07 / t: ~ I

f---I-----!-::--_-:-t--- / I i 400 -- . 25 87 4 2. 9 9/ 0 G - -- --- --.- -----r-r---r-----

--. / I I ED 26 188.2 28 31 59 / ,

~ NOTE-;V!.J;J1B};?5 A;-;A---;~'Y T TO PtJllfT5 / / I : ~ Oil CI/If'IIE5 /i'EP/i'EJ'ENT ?Ot//DAtl:;- TiMf'- ;/ I i I ~ £/(4TI/)(£5 /,,1' tJf61?EL5 C£/'ITI6f?A/J£ / 1100 j' I ~ ------- . ------------t -------------/;'---------- -----.------- --- , -"'~I -------

~ / 1 II 75e; 5 %IY/ I ~ 1 I ~ I I l1.:: 1 I ~ I I ~ J50~---~---~-I+---+----~+---+---~~Ir--~

~ I I

~ 1--_____ 1--____ -f j/ · Igo . 1050 ~I! ____ --I )..' / +-- I l' r, 1 I

?g / : 0 1050

~ 1 I " 1 /05 fb I ~ 300 --;----1--- f ; --- - ---~ 1 OO%~/ '(]" I '1. 1 I I", 1 I I ~ 1

I /

1300 . -IL..+-______ -+--________ -=--'-~I__I_---. --/

I

/ ['p1290 I

0(;' -0. ~~ Nt' '(:; " ;(50 ---------------- ---- __ /c~._I-_ - - ----- ----- - -- - -- t- - - -- - -- "------ -

88 L-_-'--_--:-'-: _ __ ..L! ___ .L.-.-___ ~' ___ _

92 94 96 98 100 90

50(J/VfJN£55, PERCENT PLATt: 5

Page 50: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

/00

£FF£C T OF 5liAPE ANO D£5J6N ON 50UIvON£5.5 or COMPOJITIO/I/ 1(; IJ

POUf(I!'Y6 TEMPERATURE; f}[{i'R£E5 r 1832 dJI2 2192 23 72 2552

.. __ ., ---------_. I HOLLOW CYLlIYOER .5P£CIM£N 1----- TEN.5/L£ T£5T BAR I .'

98 -. ---.-~ ._-. ------- -. --·t-_· -... ---' . t .....

j

. .... r'- ... - - --- . . _. - -

i S--- ~--~ I , " r"

96 ._-. -'- 1 '-' 1'~\ n I ! \ T

I I !

I t

I I \J I .1

94 --L-.- -----i- ------1 - --~\~-- -----4-- -I I I ~ I I 6 " \ 1

92 1---+-1-._ .---+ ___ . ___ .. --t-.-_ .. - __ 1.--- - - ___ . ____ _

I I

90 ~--. -- .-~--+- ---- -----_._._----_._ ... -.

88 ---1--.--.- ---.-------.o~---_+_--;

HEIfT CHEMICAL ANALYSIS P£RC£IYT

It' 0 ~--'--" -"----'-T- '-

86 - --- _Eg_ 1?_. ffi. -~~i~;.- _~= .. ----• 23 874 3.1 1 9 .::..5-+-­o 20 872., 37 CJ~t--~ • 21 87tJ ZtJ 90

84L' --~------~L-------L-------~------~~~ 1100 1200 1300 1400 1000

POURIIV6 TEMPERATURE, O£6R£{'S C

PLATE 6

Page 51: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

~

~ ~ ~

~~

it ~~

~

~~

~~

~ ~

\S ~

~ ~

~~

~~

~ ~~

~~

~ ~

~~ ~ ~

~"" ~ ~ V)~

~ h~

~~

~~

~ ~§

~~

\:) ~

)... ~~

~

~~

~

~

~~

J..:::~ ~§

~~

"'-J

V)

~~

~ ~~

(r)~ ~

"'-J~

~~

~N

~~

~~

~ ~

Page 52: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

FU

LL .

5IZ

E L

ON

GIT

UO

INA

L S

EC

TlO

N5

OF

5'pE

CIM

E!Y

5 O

FC

OM

P05

1TIO

N G

il M

EL

TE

D A

IYO

.50

LIO

IFlE

O t

iND

ER

V

AR

IOU

S

GA

S A

TM

OS

PH

ER

ES

l i if " .. ~ •

i,

SU

LP

HU

R

DIO

XID

E

AIR

W

ATE

R

VA

PO

R

HY

DR

OG

EN

PL

AT

E 8

Page 53: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

C')

C\J

~

~

C\JOV~

• ~~~~~ ~

~ ~

~

1--.""

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ov

C'\J ~c:;s

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~ h:

~

~

'-J

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ C\J();:)~

~

~~~

~ ""

V)

~

~

~ ~

i?)

~ §

~ ~

~

\3

-.....J

~ ~ ~ C

\JI);:) ~~

C))

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -.....J

~

~

~

~

........

~~~~

~~~~

Page 54: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

OETAIL5 OF HOLLOW CYLI/VIJ£I? TE5T CASTING

T()P VIEW

A'

/ , ,/

~lr-- -" '-- 2'LJ --- l~ !f-1 4--ci!J---~ 5ECTIOIY AT A-A'

PLATE 10

Page 55: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

~j ---------i

I

In 1 I

i I I

4"

-

1 1

I 1

I 1

J .,----T-

_ -l, ~

1/

1 .,(1

I !

,~:

\ .

~\r'

-+-

.-~' -~ ----+

-f---

\ \~ i

1-( :

/[ 1 1_~--1

1 I

I :

I,

I I

I'

f3 :

I 8

----

---

-t------4-----

I

r---'-J '~I A

------·--j

: !

I

i~

---,.---"-4--

i !

'-I~ ~

:.56

5-

, , i

: I

H

~"""'-:..{; 9

' ~",,----.l...--I

f :::

i

-'I:~

"':.J !

----1

+-, I ;

I

"I~

'\)

~k--+--~

\ ..

-----T-1

I "'J I ~--+-----1 ----t-

r----1

f----,

-' "'l I

/"

, '

--~ 2

;

/J,RA6

PL

AT

E

//

Page 56: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

C\J ""'-

~ ~~

~ ""

~

~~

~~

~

~\S

C\J ~

~h..

~

'-J~ ~

~~

~

Page 57: Some causes for porosity and leakage in non-ferrous castings

HYORAULIC PRE55t1RE TES TING O£VICE

PLATE 1.3