Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Solid State Transformers (SST)
Classical Transformer
Classical Transformer
Classical Transformer
Classical Transformer
Higher Frequency Lower Volume
The SS is one of the key elements in power electronics based microgrids systems
Currently: Power electronic based solution to replace the standard LF transformer, with the features:• –galvanic isolation between the input and the output of the
converter. • –active control of power flow in both directions• –compensation to disturbances in the power grid, such as
variations of input voltage, short-term sag or swell. • –provide ports or interfaces to connect distributed power
generators or energy storage device• •Smart Transformer: Solid State Transformer with control
functionalities and communication.
The basic idea of the SST is to achieve the voltage transformation by medium to high frequency isolation, therefore to potentially reduce the volume and weight of it compared with the traditional power transformer.
Solid State Transformer
Key components
• High frequency transformers
• Power electronics converters
AC to DCDC to DCDC to AC
Solid State Transformer
Solid State Transformer
Solid State Transformer
Solid State Transformer
Solid State Transformer
UNIFLEX
• UNIFLEX was a European project with UoN as technical lead looking at power electronics structures for future European Energy Networks
• Lots of European leading Industry and Universities
• Part funded by the European Commission
The Solid State Substation
• Traditional substations are passive:
– Perform voltage step down from say 33kV to 415V, isolation point etc.
– Very efficient, Very reliable
• What if we “improved” these with power electronics?
– Why bother? • HF Magnetics- smaller footprint• Ability to carry out FACTs operations• Ability to Link Renewables• Ability to Link to Energy Storage• More flexible control• Reactive power support• Link Asynchronous systems….
….the list continues!!!
Introduction
UNIFLEX-PM (“Advanced Power Converters for Universal and Flexible Power Management in Future Electricity Networks”)
Uniflex Project Objectives:
• Develop multi-cellular, modular and scalable converter architecture that can be utilised in power systems
• Analyse system functionalities in different operation modes
• Validate system functionalities with simulation and experiment
UNIFLEX-PM: Concept
Power conversion module
Controllable AC Voltage (or current)
Controllable AC Voltage (or current)
Isolation Barrier
• Isolated modules can be connected in series/parallel• Configurable for many power conversion functions
• Three phase AC-AC power conversion• Single phase AC power conversion “cut-down” version for traction• .........
Possible layout of a future grid with UNIversal and FLEXible Power Module
Future Electrical Network
Potential use of concept
Implementation example
•Modular multi-level power converter
•Three ports with bidirectional power flow circa 5 MW rated power
•Directly grid connected to the Distribution Network (10-20 kV)
•Incorporates Renewable Energy Systems (RES) and utilises energy storage
Overview of Uniflex Functionality
UNIFLEX3
3
3Port 1 Port 2
Port 3
• Voltage ratio adjustment• example: voltage at Port 1 changes, whilst voltages at Port 2 and Port 3 are maintained constant.
• Frequency changing• Frequency at each port different – connection of asynchronous systems
• Phase changing• example: input/output voltages (ie Port 1 – Port 2) are locked in frequency but maintained with (controllable) phase shift between them.
• Asymmetric load current cancellation• example: load at port 2 unbalanced (eg unbalanced currents with balanced voltage). Current at Port 1 and Port 3 balanced.
• Voltage asymmetry cancellation• example: voltage at Port 1 unbalanced (ie connected to unbalanced grid). Voltage at Port 2 and Port 3 maintained balanced.
• Reactive power control• Independent control of reactive power at all ports (simultaneously) – voltage support
• Active power control• fast control of active power at each port, subject to power balance
• Harmonic cancellation• example: harmonic pollution in currents in port 2 (for example) – “clean” currents on port 1 and 3. Alternatively, harmonically polluted voltage
fed to port 1 – “clean” voltage produced at ports 2 and 3.
Modular Building Blocks
Building block based on DC/DC isolation module:
Building block based on DC/AC isolation module:
Two technologies consideredBoth provide bidirectional AC-AC power flow with Medium Frequency (kHz) isolation
Multilevel Converters
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time /s
Am
plit
ude
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time /s
Am
plit
ude
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 50000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Frequency /Hz
Am
plit
ude
(N
orm
alis
ed)
5 Level
Conventional
The more H-Bridges… the higher the voltage and the better the approximation to a sine wave (more levels)
Single H-Bridge
2 H-Bridges in series
Chosen prototype structure
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
DCDC
Port 1
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
H-bridge
Port 2
Port 3
3-p
hase
grid
/load
Sto
rag
e e
lem
ents
3-p
hase
grid
/load
Ue1(A)
Ue2(A)
Ue3(A)
Ue4(A)
Ue1(B)
Ue2(B)
Ue3(B)
Ue4(B)
Ue1(C)
Ue2(C)
Ue3(C)
Ue4(C)
Ue1(A)
Ue1(B)
Ue1(C)
Ue2(A)
Ue2(B)
Ue2(C)
Ue3(A)
Ue3(B)
Ue3(C)
Ue4(A)
Ue4(B)
Ue4(C)
•Cascaded structure ofAC/DC/DC/AC converterswith Medium Frequency Isolation
•Cascaded H-Bridge structure formed at the AC terminals (Port 1 and 2)
• Structure allows the Converter to be arranged in parallel and series combinations to meet application power levels
Control Challenges
•Assume that each DC/DC converter (isolation module) equalises the DC link voltage on each side of the isolation barrier. Two things need to be considered:
•Global Power Flow Controli.e. Power entering through one port must leave through one of the
other two!
•Internal power flow control•Energy must be distributed amongst the cells in such a way that the DC link capacitor voltages remain equal
•Evenly distributes voltage stress•Ensures high quality waveforms at the AC connections
•Ports 2 and 3 control power for the grids/storage systems that they are connected to
Port 1 is the global power flow controller since it is connected to all other ports
Converter control
Port 1 control diagram
1 2 3
• Lots of control to cope with, lots of nested loops• Need to be very careful with design• The more cells, the more dc link voltages, the better the waveform:
• BUT- the more balancing we have to do!
Modulation Challenges
• Since the target application is for high power, switching frequency must be minimised. In this case:
• Switching Frequency of each AC side H-Bridge =250Hz
• Switching Frequency of isolation modules =2kHz (soft switched- phew!)
Fortunately for the AC side, if we have lots switching at low frequency, we still get a good waveform!
Converter Prototype
•Converter designed for operation at 3.3kV with a power rating up to 300-500kW
•Each UNIFLEX-PM module rated at around 25kW with a DC link voltage of 1.1kV approx.
•Construction:•Transformers designed and constructed by ABB Secheron•Cells designed by EPFL, Switzerland- single cell tested in lab at EPFL•Control design, construction of full 3.3kV converter and peripherals (measurement, gate drives etc.)- PEMC group UoN
Isolation Module: Transformer
• MF transformer design by ABB Secheron, Switzerland
• Designed for operation at 2kHz- Amorphous core, Litz wire etc.
• Oil immersed for insulation and cooling
AC/DC/DC/AC Module
• Two H-Bridges and a DC link connected on either side of the transformer
• H-bridges consist of:
• DYNEX 1700V, 200A modules
• Forced air cooling
• Gate drives isolated for several kV
• DC Link Capacitance on each side of the transformer:
• 1350V, 3.3mF
Implementation of Control
•Control of entire converter implemented using
•TI6713 DSK board•5 Actel ProAsic 3 FPGA
boards designed at theUniversity of Nottingham
•DC/DC converters (isolation module) controlled solely by the FPGA cards
•Global power flow control implemented on DSP
Initial Hardware Setup
Module
Transducer Box
IGBT GateDrives
dc link capacitor
Control hardware connected
Fibre Opticlines
Fibre OpticTransmitters
FPGACards
DSP andComms
Card
Experimental Prototype in MV Cage
Overhead view of rig
Experimental Work: 3 Phase Y-Y two ports
Two port converter
Ports 1 and 2 connected to grids
operated with voltages from 415V
to 3.3kV (Dependent on test).
Bidirectional power flow up to
300kW.
Real power flow in both directions
Power Flow from Port 1 to Port 2 Power Flow from Port 2 to Port 1
Port
1Po
rt 2
•Converter voltage (green)•Supply Current (red)•Supply Voltage (blue)
fsw(device)=250Hz
4 Quadrant control of port 2V
oltage (
V),
Curr
ent
(A*1
0) Port 2
-P, +/- Q
Port 2
P, +/- Q
Imbalanced cell power flow control
•Imbalanced power drawn from port 2 cells resulting in DC linkvoltage divergence. Corrected by balancing control scheme
Asynchronous systems 60Hz/50Hz: Experimental Setup
Supplied by Chroma
61705 Variable Frequency
Power Supply @415V
Power Flow
Asynchronous systems 60Hz/50Hz: Experimental result
Port
1: 6
0H
zPo
rt 2
: 50
Hz
Medium Voltage Testing
•Vs=3.3kV approx., fsw=250Hz, 205kW power flow
4 Quadrant Power Flow @3.3kV
-P,-Q
-P,Q
P,-Q
P, Q
4 Quadrant Test Video
Video of four quadrant transients for LV testing…
Further work
•Advanced Control Strategy to control the converter on a “per-phase” basis that enables the converter to:
Monitor each phase of the supply and track the gird angle of each phase independently
Control the power flow in each phase independently.
Operate under conditions of grid disturbances such as:
Phase Jumps Voltage sags and swells Fault Conditions Frequency excursions
• Low device switching frequency modulation is required to minimise the switching losses for operation at higher power.
• Power Flow control using three ports within a system emulating a real grid.
Power Electronics Challenges
• High Voltage - “sharing” between series devices etc.
– This has been a problem for many years… getting it wrong can mean huge cascading failures
• High Power - largest current HVDC systems 6300MW (Itaipu, Brazil)
- At these powers, efficiency is vital- 90% efficiency for a 10MW converter means we have 1MW of loss!!!
- Power Electronics losses Switching Loss (Imperfect operation of semiconductors) Conduction Loss (Voltage drop) Magnetics (Eddy Currents+ Hysteresis… especially at High
Frequency)
• High Frequency- Size of magnetic components reduces as we increase the frequency
- Also- Size of filtering components for PWM reduces as we increase the frequency
- Unfortunately, our switching losses will increase with frequency (generally) “Soft Switching” important
THANK YOU!