Upload
buidieu
View
238
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NASAReferencePublication1121
A_t 198.,Solar Absorptance andThermal Emittance of
Some Common Spacecraft
Thermal-Control Coatings
John H. Hemmer
(NASA-_-I 21) 50LAR &I_5OSP_ANCE ANL)
T_aaAL E._IT_AH(.E OF SC_E CC_MON Si)ACZCRA_T
_i!_L_AL-CGNTIIOL COATI_G5 (_ASA) _7 phC &OJ/M_" A01 CSCL 11D
N$_-23698
UncLas
UIIZq 19170
L
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19840015630 2018-04-21T08:20:27+00:00Z
NASA
ReferencePublication1121
1984
Scientific and TechnicalInformation Branch
Solar Absorptance andThermal Emittance of
Some Common Spacecraft
Thermal-Control Coatings
John H. Henninger
_ddard 5,pace t"hgkt Center
(;r,',',tb, I',. .'_lar_land
MI measurement values are expressed in the International System of Units!3II in accordance with NASA Policy Directive "_n A....... paragraph 4.
ABSTRACT
Solar absorptance and thermal emittance of spacecraft materials are critical parameters in determin-
ing spacecraft temperature control. Because thickness, surface preparation, coatings formulation,
manufacturing techniques, etc. affect these parameters, it is usually necessary to measure the
absorptance and emittance of materials before they are used. Also, because most materials exhibit
some amount of degradation dye to outgassing, ultraviolet, and or particle damage, it is necessary to
conduct laboratory testing on these materials before certifying them for use in space.
This document contains absorptance and emittance data for many common types of thermal-control
coatings, together with some sample spectral data curves of absorptance, in cases for which ultra-
violet and particle radiation data are available, the degraded absorptance and emittance values arealso listed.
m
0°,111
w
CONTENTS
Page
...
..°.....°.°.°.o .... ° ...... ......°........ .... ....°....... m
' I:_IPflON OF MEASUREMENTS ......................................... 2
iNSTRUMENTATION ...................................................... 4
ULTRAVIOLET DEGRADATION TESTING COMMENTS .......................... 4
CONCLUSIONS ........................................................... 5
TABULATED DATA ....................................................... 7
REFERENCES ............................................................ 43
P_IN(; PAGE BI.ANg NOT gri'.ltfrD
Y
_ INTL_I_lOIIA,Id,Y
SOLAR ABSORPTANCE AND THERMAL EMITTANCE DATA OF SOME COMMON
SPACECRAFT THE RMAL-CONTROL COATINGS
John H. Henninger
Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, Maryland
INTRODUCTION
The Radiation Simulation and Thermal Control Section of the Environmental Test and Integration
Branch of the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) routinely makes measurements on spacecraft
materials to determine their solar absorptance and thermal emittance (_ and e-n ) values for use inspacecraft thermal design. Except for calorimetric emittance, all measurements are made at room
temperature (300 K). It is normally assumed that samples are opaque (i.e., the thickness of the
coatings is sufficient to prevent interference from the substrate). Opacity is important because sur-
face preparation, coatings formulation, manufacturing techniques, thickness, and application pro-
cedu, es can greatly affect the absorptance and emittance.
The importance of the solar absorptance for spacecraft temperature arises from the fact that the
absorbed solar radiation is typically the predominant external heat input to the spacecraft. The im-
portance of the thermal emittance is that it controls the rate at which heat leaves the spacecraft. A
clearer idea of the effect of these parameters on spacecraft temperature can be obtained by con-
sidering the very simple case of a body in thermal equilibrium with solar radiation (i.e., there are no
other external heat sources and there is no source within the body). In addition, the body is iso-
thermal. For these conditions, the thermal equilibrium of the body implies that the solar radiation
absorbed equals the long-wave radiation emitted (reference 1 ). This is expressed as:
A_ sa = Ao eT4
or solving for T gives:
where
o
¼
T = temperature
A s -- area perpendicular to solar radiation
A = total area emitting radiation
s = solar constant
a = absorptance
e = emittance
o = Boltzmann's constant
From these equations, it is evident that the selection of materials on the basis of their absorptance
and emittance values is of primary importance in spacecraft temperature control.
DESCRIPTION OF MEASUREMENTS
Solar Absorptance (_,) Measurement
To obtain solar absorptance of a material, reflectance as a function of wavelength is measured, from
which the absorptance is then calculated. The technique used at GSFC employs a spectrophotom-
eter with an integrating sphere attachment (reference 2) for collecting the reflected specular and
diffuse components of the material to obtain total reflectance versus wavelength valves. The reflec-
tance measurements are made over the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum from 0.3 to 2.4
micrometers because this region contains about 95 percent of the Sun's energy (reference 3).
Figures 1 through 20 show reflectance curves for some common materials.
Mathematically expressed, the procedure for computing the solar absorptance of a given material
from its total reflectance spectrum (specular and diffuse components) at a given angle of incidence,
0 (reference 4), is:
_(0) = 1-_(0)
b'(0) =
f _, = 2.4/_m R_, (0) H ), d ),= 0.3/_mm i ii i
f_'_ H ), d2 Q4 9m
= 0,3 _m
where
• (0) =
RX(O) =
H)_ =
_(0) =
solar absorptance at angle of incidence 0
total reflectance at wavelength _, at 0
solar extraterrestial spectrum
solar reflectance at 0
In practice, the integrals are approximated by discrete summations (numerical integration).
-)
At GSFC, manual data reduction for absorptance has been replaced by using encoders attached to
the pen and wavelength drives of the DK-2 spectrophotometer. Data from the encoders are trans-
ferred to a microcomputer through an appropriate interface. A 'basic' computer program is used to
process the encoded data and automatically calculate the absorptance of the material.
Normal Emittance (e'n)
In the past at GSFC, room-temperature emittance measurements (300 K) were made using an
infrared spectrophotometer with an attached heated cavity (Holhraum), (reference 5). This infrared
source was used both as a reference and for illuminating the sample. Spectral reflectance measure-
ments were made over the wavelength region from 5 to 35 micrometers. This region contains
approximately 90 percent of the energy of a 300 K blackbody radiator (reference 1). These data
were used to calculate the emittance. This type of instrumentation was difficult to maintain and
ha_ been replaced at GSFC with the much simpler portable emissometer manufactured by the Gier-
Dunkle Instrument Company, a subsidiary of Dynatech, Incorporated.* The DB-100 portable
emissometer gives an integrated value of normal emittance with a high degree of accuracy for most
nov,selective or gray materials. For selective materials (reference 6), the errors can be significant,
but these errors can be minimized by the experienced operator if correction factors are known or
can be determined. Normal emittance measurements fin ) are converted to hemispherical emittance
(e'h) by using conversion factors determined by Jakob (reference 7).
The following formulas are used for computing total normal emittance, _. (reference 4):
_'. (T) = _n(T)
_.(T) = l-_.(T)
_ = 35 pm: 5 pm p.(k) J)_(T_I?,.
_,(T) f_, : 35 pm D,(T) d),J_,: 5 pm
J),(T) = Planckian blackbody function
g. (T) = Total normal emittance at T
_n (T) = Total normal absorptance at T
_. (T) = Total normal reflectance at T
in actual computations, discrete summations are used in place of the foregoing integrals.
Calorimetric Emittance
A_,other method of making emittance measurements, developed and in use at GSFC. employs a
calorimetric technique to determine emittance. This method is known as a transient thermal
*Gier.Dunkk,Incorporated,SantaMonk:*,California.
o,
technique for obtaining emittance. A complete description of the calorimetric facility and measure-
ment technique is given in reference 4.
INSTRUMENTATION
Many different type spectrophotometers are available for use in making absorptance and emittance
measurements. The systems at GSFC have been in use since 1965. Some modifications have been
made in recent years, mainly in the areas of computerized data reduction and integrating sphere-
coating improvements. The sodium ctdoride (NaCI) and barium sulfate (BaSO 4 ) coatings used today
have proved to be much more durable than the old 'smoked' magnesium oxide (MgO) coatings.
Solar Absorptanca (_)
A Beckman DK-2A spectrophotometer modified with a Gier-Dunkle absolute integrating sphere
(Figure 21 ) is used for making absolute reflectance, absorptance, and transmittance measurements.
This instrument covers the wavelength region from 300 to 2400 nanometers (nm). The ir_trument
is coupled to a microcomputer for data reduction. The manufacturer's data lists an accuracy of
-+0.015 u,its over the total measurement range.
Normal Emittance (_".)
The Gier-Dunkle portable emissometer, model DB-100 (Figure 22) is used to make normal emittance
measurements at room temperature. This instrument gives a single integrated value of emittance. It
uses dual rotating cavities that reference sample radiation against an essentially room-temperature
blackbody. The instrument has a potassium bromide (KBr) thermocouple detector, which is sensi-
tive over the 5- to 25-micrometer wavelength range. The manufacturer's data lists an accuracy of
en +0.02 units over the total measurement range for nonselective materials and Vn +0.04 for mostselective materials.
Hemispherical Emittanca (e'h)
The hemispherical emittance system is composed of a high-vacuum chamber with a liquid nitrogen
(LN 2 ) cooled shroud (Figure 23). The inside of the shroud is painted with a highly absorbing blackpaint. Vacuum pressure is maintained at I 0"6 tort, whereas the shroud is kept at liquid nitrogen
temperature. Samples are suspended within the shroud _nd are heated through a 5-inch diameter
quartz port using an X25 solar simulator.* Calorimetric emittance measurements can be made over
a temperature range of +70 ° to -70°C using this system. A larger temperature range can be obtained
for some types of materials. Data reduction for emittance is accomplished with the aid of a micro-
computer using the temperature versus time data.
ULTRAVIOLET D[ "RAOATION TESTING
Because many materials .sed for thermal-control purposes exhibit degradation when exposed to
ultraviolet (UV) or particle radiation, efforts to simulate this degradation have been carried out on
*Manufactured by Spectrolab, Incorporatod, Los Angeles, CaIlfornb.
4
__.._
many types of coatings. The object of the degradation testing has been to determine if the materials
to be used will survive their planned missions without exceeding a predetermined degradation value.
A complete list and description of degradation testing facilities at GSFC has been published (refer-
ence 8). This list includes a solar-wind facility (Figure 24) (UV and protons), vudarms system (UV
and reflectance), and multisedes system (Figure 25) (multisample UV and reflectance).
The X-25 solar simulator is the source used for ultraviolet degradation because it gives a very good
match with the solar spectrum. Since certain materials are subject to partial recovery from degrada-
tion effects (UV and particles) when re-exposed to the atmosphere, it is often necessary to make
measurements in situ to determine accurate changes in absorptance values.
CONCLUSIONS
Because a continual need exists for measurements in thermal-control analysis, absorptance and emit-
tance measurements will continue to be made on old and new materials. With future Shuttle flights,
and gn values will be necessary in support of instrumentation and as a check for contaminationof various flight surfaces. Absorptance and emittance values are not the sole criteria for selecting
coatings because selection usually represents a compromise of many factors. Coatings stability in
space, mission life, orbit factors, instrument functions, and coatings outgassing properties are some
of the more important criteria in selecting a coating for flight use.
This document lists only the more commonly used and requested data. The values are average ones
that generally reflect a tolerance on absorptance and emittance of +0.02 units over the total mea-
surement range (e.g., (_ or in - 0.XX +-0.02)). Because, as previously mentioned, many factors caninfluence absorptance and emittance values, it is suggested that confirmation measurements should
be made on specific sample materials before final commitment to spaceflight use.
Goddatd Space Flight Center
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGreenbelt, Maryland December 1983
BLACK COATINGS
en
Anodize Alack " 0.88"
Carbon Black Paint NS-7
Catalac Black Paint
Chemglaze Black Paint Z306
Delrin Black Plastic
Ebanol C Black
Ebanol C Black-384 ESH* UV
GSFC Black Silicate MS-94
GSFC Black Paint 313-1
Hughson Black Paint H322
Hughson Black Paint L-300
Martin Black Paint N-150-1
0.88
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.97
0.97
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.95
0.94
Martin Black Velvet Paint
3M Black Velvet Paint
Paladin Black Lacquer
Parsons Black Paint
0.91
0.97
0.95
0.98
Polyethylene Black Plastic
Pyramil Black on Beryllium Copper
Tedlar Black Plastic
Velestat Black Plastic• =
0.93
0.92
0.94
0.96i
*ESH = equivalent Sun hours of ultraviolet radiation.
0.88
0.88
0.91
0.87
0.73
0.75
0.89
0.86
0.86
0.84
0.94
0.94
0.91
0.75
0.91
0.92
0.72
0.90
0.85
. ::_,i';': FA::I: BLANK N_T FILMED
toat 'aon, tv
WHITE COATINGS
i ,
Barium Sulphate with Polyvinyl Alcohol
Biphenyl-White Solid
Catalac White Paint
Dupont Lucite Acrylic Lacquer
Dow Coming White Paint DC-O07
0.06
0.23
0.24
0.35
0.19
GSFC White Paint NS43-C
GSFC White Paint NS44-B
GSFC White Paint MS-74
GSFC White Paint NS-37
Hughson White Paint A-276
0.20
0.34
0.17
0.36
0.26
Hughson White Paint A-276 + 1036 ESH UV
Hughson White Paint V-200
Hughson white Paint Z-202
Hughson White Paint Z-202 + lO00 ESH UV
Hughson White Paint Z-255
Mautz White House Paint
3M-401 White Paint
Magnesium Oxide White Paint
Magnesium Oxide Aluminium Oxide Paint
Opal Glass
OSO-H _Vhite Paint 63W
P764-I A White Paint
Potassium Fluorotitanate White Paint
Sherwin Williams White Paint (A8Wl l )
Sherwin Williams White Paint (F8W2030)
Sherwin Williams F8W2030 with Polasol
V6V241
Sperex White Paint
Tedlar White Plastic
Titanium Oxide White Paint with Methyl
Silicone
Titanium Oxide White Paint with Potassium
Silicate
Zerlauts S-l 3G White Paint
Zerlauts Z-93 White Paint
Zinc Orthotitanate with Potassium Silicate
Zinc Oxide with Sodium Silicate
Zirconium Oxide with 650 Glass Resin
0.44
0.26
0.25
0.40
0.25
0.30
0.25
0.09
0.09
0.28
0.27
0.23
0.15
0.28
0.39
0.36
0.34
0.39
0.20
0.17
0.20
0.17
0.13
0.15
0.23
0.88
0.86
0.90
0.90
0.88
0.92
0.91
0.92
0.91
0.88
0.88
0.89
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.90
0.91
0.90
0.92
0.87
0.83
0.92
0.88
0.87
0.82
0.87
0.85
0.87
0.90
0.92
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.88. .
8
®
CONDUCTIVE PAINTS
Brilliant Aluminum Paint
Epoxy Aluminum Paint
Finch Aluminum Paint 643-1-1
Leafing Aluminum in Epon 828
Leafing Aluminum (80-U)
NRL Leafing Aluminum Paint
NRL Leafing Aluminum Paint
Silicone Aluminum Paint
Dupont Silver Paint 4817
Chromeric Silver Paint 586
GSFC Yellow NS-43-G
GSFC Green NS-53-B
0.30
0.77
0.22
0.37
0.29
0.24
0.28
0.29
0.43
0.30
0.38
0.52
GSFC Green NS-43-E
GSFC White NS-43-C
GSFC Green NS-55-F
GSFC Green NS-79
0.57
0.20
0.57
0.57
0.31
0.81
0.23
0.36
0.32
0.24
0.29
0.30
0.49
0.30
0.90
0.87
0.89
0.92
0.91
0.91
i
- °
9
ANODIZEDALUMINUM SAMPLES*
S
Black
Black
Blue
Blue
Brown
Chromic
Clear
Clear
Green
Gold
Plain
Red
Sulphuric
Yellow
Blue Anodized Titanium Foil
m ,.
0.65
0.86
0.67
0.53
0.73
0.44
0.27
0.35
0.66
0.48
0.82
0.86
0.87
0.82
0.86
0.56
0.76
0.84
0.88
0.82
0.26
0.57
0.42
0.47
0.70
0.04
0.$8
0.87
0.87
0.13
*Coating thickness is critical.
10
®
METALS AND CONVERSION*
Alzac A-2
Alzac A-5
Black Chrome
Black Copper
Black lrridite
Black Nickel
Buffed Aluminum
Buffed Copper
Com,antan- Metal Strip
Copper Foil Tape
Plain
Sanded
Tarnished
Dow 7 on Polished Magnesium
Dow 7 on Sanded Magnesium
Dow 9 on Magnesium
Dow 23 on Magnesium
Ebanol C Black
Eiectroplated Gold
Electroless Nickel
lrridite Aluminum
inconel X Foil (1 rail)
Kannigen - Nickel Alloy
Plain Ber/llium Copper
Platinum Foil
Stain1 _'ss Steel
Polished
Machined
Sandblasted
Machine Rolled
Boom-Polished
i-rail 304 Foil
Tantalum Foil
Tungsten Polished
COATINGS
_$
0.16
0.18
0.96
0.98
0.62
0.91
0.16
0.30
0.37
0.32
0.26
0.55
..
.°
.°
0.62
0.97
0.23
0.39
..
0.52
0.45
0.31
0.33
0.42
0.47
0.58
0.39
0.44
0.40
0.40
0.44
_r
0.73
0.62
0.63
0.17
0.66
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.49
0.65
0.87
0.67
0.77
0.03
0.07
0.11
0.10
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.11
0.14
0.38
0.11
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.03
*Thickness of coating can change values significantly.
II
VAPOR-DEPOSITED COATINGS*
_s _n
Aluminum
Aluminum on Fiberglass
Aluminum on Stainless Steel
Chromium
Chromium on 5-mil Kapton
0.08
0.15
0.08
0.56
0.57
Germanium
Gold
Iron Oxide
Molybdenum
Nickel
Rhodium
Silver
Titanium
Tungsten
0.52
0.19
0.85
0.56
0.38
0.18
0.04
0.52
0.60
*On glass substrates except as noted.
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.17
0.24
0.09
0.02
0.56
0.21
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.12
0.27
12
° h° dPq 8.° -- n mUll
®"-1
SOLAR CELLS
Spacecraft &s _'.
AE
AMSAT
ATN Black
ATN Blue
ATS-F
COMSAT
DE
ETS/GOES
GOES
GPS-Conductive Coating
HELLOS
IME-Conductive Coating
IMP-H
IMP-I
ISEE-Conductive Coating
IUE
OAO
PAC
SMS-B
Spanish INTASAT
SSS
0.78
0.82
0.77
0.86
0.85
0.82
0.77
0.82
0.91
0.81
0.80
0.75
0.78
0.78
0.91
0.86
0.85
0.77
0.81
0.86
0.79
0.82
0.85
0.80
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.81
O.8O
0.81
0.80
0.82
0.79
0.82
0.81
0.79
0.84
0.81
0.81
0.80
0.86
0.82
13
COMPOSITE COATINGS
Aluminum Oxide (AI 203 )-(! 2 X/4) on Buffed Aluminum
Initial
2560 ESH UV + P*
Aluminum Oxide (AI 2 03 )-(! 2 ),/4) on Fused Silica
0.13
0.13
0.12
Silver Beryllium Copper (AgBeCu)
Kapton Overcoating
Parylene C Overcoating
Teflon Overcoating
GSFC Dark Mirror Coating-SiO-Cr-Al
GSFC Composite SiOx-Al 2 03 -Ag
Helios Second Surface Mirror/Silver Backing:
Initial
24 Hours at 5 Suns
48 Hours at I l Suns + P+
lnconel with Teflon Overcoating-I rail
Vespel Polyimide SP!
0.19
0.31
0.22
0.12
0.86
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.55
0.89
0.23
0.23
0.24
0.03
0.57
0.34
0.38
0.04
0.68
0.79
0.80
0.79
0.46
0.90
I4
FILMSANDTAPES
m, i i i ,
Aclar Film (Aluminum Backing)
1 mil
2mil
5mil
Kapton Film (Aluminum Backing)
0.08 rail
0.15 rail
0.25 rail
0.50 rail
].0 mil
1.5 mil
2.0 rail
3.0 rail
5.0 rail
Kapton Film (Chromium-Silicon Oxide-Aluminum Backing
(Green))
!.0 rail
Kapton Film (Aluminum-Aluminum Oxide Overcoating)-! rail
Initial
i 800 ESH UV
Kapton Film (Aluminum-Silicon Oxide Overcoating)- ! rail
Initial
2400 ESH UV
Kapton Film (Silver-Aluminum Oxide Overcoating)- 1 rail
Initial
2400 ESH UV
Kapton Film (Aluminum-Silicon Oxide Overcoating)-0.5 mil
Initial
4000 ESH UV
Kimfoil-Polycarbonate Film (Aluminum Backing)
0.08 rail
0.20 rail
0.24 rail
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.23
0.25
0.31 !0.34
0.38
0.40
0.41
0.45
0.46
0.79
0.12
O.12
O.ll
0.22
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.28
0.19
0.20
0.17
0.45
0.62
0.73
0.24
0.34
0.45
0.55
0.67
0.71
0.75
0.82
0.86
0.78
0.20
0.20
0.33
0.33
0.19
0.21
0.18
0.24
0.23
0.30
0.28
15
16
FILMS AND TAPES (Continued)
Mylar Film
Aluminum Backing
0.15 rail
0.25 mil3.0 rail
5.0 rail
Skylab Sail
Initial
1900 ESH UV
Skylab Parasol Fabric (Orange)
Initial
2400 ESH UV
Tedlar (Gold Backing)
0.14
0.150.17
0.19
0.15
0.19
0.51
0.65
0.5 rail
1.0 rail
Teflon
Aluminum Backing
2 mil
5 rail
!0 rail
Gold Backing
0.5 rail
!.0 mil
5 mil
IO rail
Silver Backing
2 rail5 rail
I0 rail
Tefzel (Gold Backing)
0.05 mil1.0 mil
Tapes
235-3M Black
0.30
0.26
0.08
0.130.13
0.24
0.22
0.22
0.23
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.29
0.26
0,95
425-3M Aluminum Foil
850-3M Mylar-Aluminum Backing
7361 - MysticAluminized Kapton
7452- MysticAluminum Foil
7800- MysticAluminum Foil
Y9360- 3M Aluminized Mylar
0.20
015
c_.09
0.140.21
0.19
0.28
0.340.76
0.77
0.35
0.36
0.86
0.86
0.49
0.58
0.66
O.810.87
0.43
0.52
0.81
0.82
0.680.810.88
0.47
0.61
0.90
0.03
0.59
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
®
ORIq_INAL PAGE II
OF POOR QUALITY
............ ° ....................... , .....
!
I
!
!
|
t.0
v
°-
Z
I,L
17
I%) _13N¥ J._'3"l:ll_tl
I]
__r...i...........................
.._,...._....................3"
!
:L!_ ,............ !....... !..........• i i .
i
!1
l
I
I!
I
!!
II
&iZ
Ill
8 •
ORIGINAL PA(_" _1OF POOR QUAL/TY'
g i i_ . ,,, D F m m ._ I!
i I ' "" i
I
I
II!
I
l
I,,-
Ee-'
o_
E
<l,OC,,,I,y
@
Ee-
E
@
e,i
&
i9
ORIGINAL PAGE Ig
OF POOR QUALITY
!i
!!
!
!
!
!
!
|
2O
e-ra
C
T
._gu.
ORIEL PAG£ I,_
OF POOR QUALITY
¢-
t-
-g
IJ
21
OF POOP,Q_ AL..rt'Y.
{,_ I_NVJ.O_2"I:I| ¥
22
. .
. •
I'-"
_i
G°_rF/C-'_AI..PAG[;9POOR QUALFI_f
(%) 3_NY/_31d3U
1 I
: • !
I i " I ' ! " ' " T
T '_ _T........ rh-_-- t........ . ........*.... _........ =........:...............
....-_--'_-....-_'--IL: .......I ...... _....r....' ; .........
-Q-+............. -_............+----_ - i -
:_,_-i+LI!_.....f......I........_........!:_::i:: : : :....iLilsLLIi_ssLLr:...!111.....i.i]
. . : , . .
! I
t , r ' ; I
...._ .......i....... i....... _...... ] ---; ............. _...........
] •
!
!
!
lI
I
m
!
il
II! ..... i..............? . _ -l-----T_'-r----I-......T.........i...............................+ " : ........... lit"
.................... |', i:_;..... ; ...... ! 't_....... : ....................:'"t *'_ __ _ ' _ ' i ....
I- I........÷.........__i ....1............i ! _ , : Ill
]........I-:.......ali..............i.........!,.i , : :.:: :i':: . I !.....i......:......: .............. I,
" I ......
............. i................ . ....
.... ! ' i "
_-i:_......................
I,
,
I
!
I
!
l
1
+I
ORIGINAL PAGE 18
OF POOR QUALITY
|
|
!
|
O.w
I
c_
oo
U.
•" 24
ORIGINAL PAGE !_OF POOR QUALITY
CD
0
Z
CD
o
UJ
oo
C0
A
I,.=
Eot-O
rn
0
r'C_e,.
.__
2_
z
" i _ 1 . i ....
...... _ ....... L . . ,
............................ I.i
I
.... i.
" " : • • " l
!........... t
m
ii'"'hi°! • t i' _ ................ i ...... J,.............. _ .........
_... i ! : _ i
U:I i
i.... i..._ . , . _ ......
' ' i i i * '• _ . _ .. , ..... . . .
!
.I.
• ' _ * P m
.. '_ . i , . '
!
M.
. ORIGINAL PAGE ISOF POOR QUALITY-- (%) 3:)N¥133"l:I3U
; ! ! I !
__ I I I j I
|
: 8
m
.!1
M
.L : • ;-i ..... i i " .....'---!-,-_ .........i----,----i------!....... _.........i.........i........ : . ,E h
'* ; r I l I ;
......... _ ........ -1 ........ _----,----1 ...... i ...... i. _ i-
I i ! ! I -:-"T"• ' .... _.....i........ *......i......._ i........i i i-
..I.. ' ................... ' ' ............ ; ............
1 ' t ....... • !
_-..... l..... ; .... L...... 2
........................... l..... a .......i .......... ; ........
i ' i :
......... f ......... f ......... it........ ! ...... ,
....i....... 1.......... i ..... , ....! ! ' i ! i , ,
: : .-. .
!
I
I
I
!
l
il
P
II
ill
!
I
l
1.
il'
il_
:t
o
¢0Q,.
,21
e,,,i(I}
f,,}
"0
0
ulLUCar}i
=1
ii
27
-'% ,e.(I _ _..",,_, dl_
ORiGIINAI..PAGE UOF POOR QUALITY
(%1_IONV.I,._"I:I _iU
m'
I
D
!
...... _...... i .... _ ....... . ..... _........ ,....... _.....
i
!
II
II
!1
I
l
I
I
!1
!
III
28
ORIGINAL PAGE nil
OF POOR QU,'i.ITY.
29
.,- .._ • -7--...,_;7__ __---'-..., - ...... "
ORIGINAL PAGE IS
OF POOR QUALITY
I
3O
ORI(_III',I,RL FP,_ _1
OF POOr QU:Vn'_.
|_t,)331_lVL3:l"t:lDU
i " _ i " ! " I : _ " : t ' : " • ' , i i ' ' ': i / ! i I l I / _ ! I ;
..... i.... :._ : ._ I . J _.. t .1 : .....LI : i. 1 . , . _ - -/ ; / i i " " I _ t _ !
_.: t ! r: I I.L! ! : I i / ! /; i [_t : I i t----t----7_ I _ I
_--i--r -r- -7.... :---r- -:.... . .... ',- T- -"..... __' :-.... :t .... _ t i jII_I
'-+ ..... " --_ ......._-.... _.......... _.... _-..... _.... "-- '÷ .... _.... _- _ ........ ! " i " i .,t,t t+tt: ,t,t,t t,f i -i r 7 t _ T ' ': i i i _ { -_--T--_-,_....t 7-it:_--__--t-_-ti-t:t:-:_-c-t--tt-_:t--:-t-r--}_:L-_ ........i " i !. _ <_I
....... [ _ I_ } _ I:lllP ....... kli_--l[ _:, t t t, t, r,-t,f f ! , t.... I .... _ ...... "-- -- ! + .... _----'----" "" " t " "' t • . iiG_,,,,___i !1 r i ' }_ I: l':17 lil 1 i/ r I 1 I ! I _-!+_-r - "- -i ..... :........+...... r.... -' 'T ...... i-..... :,.... i- " "-.... ' ..... ! .... t f i
"" _ t _ 1 ' ,l - i ' - _ " _ l .... ,l _ _,.
_ ] l/ i : i I i i 1 : 1 : _ / _ 1 i ! " i _ ll"I>'-;-V[:::['I-t;I! r-iri ': r:!: t: :I: ! . . -t: i Ir_ _!tt_l_/; ' 7/'I-_I. ""--I t-f-T .......... i-
li_-!--; _ ! ; f "- --if----l---- - #---7"_ ...... _...... f .... _ " _ .......... 7---_-- : " t ' . 1 . t . 1- i : t • " i " ' ' ; ..
t
i.... r,--+'_.....","" _- ............
!1
I
I
II
IlL
P- _' h ., .., d --
31
-1
ORIr..-_AL PAGE ,'P
OF POOR QUALIT_
iI i .... ,........ N
!
!
32
i
[- .- i .... l •
3;t
____L_._LL_LL.
OF PO0_-, -_,,..:-_"'
!
c
8
°_
0
u
34
(*_ 3:)NVJ.:_]'I:i3 hi
• • 7
• • °
".l¢:
E
.<O)
C
.-I
c_qr.-.
Lo
LL.
35
®
ORIGINAL PAG 'e. [_.
OF POOR QUALITY
I
. . !!
I!
!
!
l
N
|
l
I
!
!
!
N
36
OmQINAL PAGE ill
OF POOR QUALITY
.>o_
(J
G)f.)t'-(u
.Qt_
O(n
:3
U.
37
38
!
ORIGINAL PAGE: IS
OF F'C,_)R QUALITY
k.
_D
E
E_D
_P
OOC_
(,¢
LL
F5
OF P:_"C/a _' __,:-'i'.'
Figure 23. Hemispherical emittance facility.
39
ORIGINAL Pf_,GE "a._
OF POOR QUALITY
/
"Ot"
._mU.
4O
ORIGINAL PAGE IS
OF POOR QUALITY
• o
41
.
.
REFERENCES
Schach, Milton, and Robert E. KidweU, Jr., Thermodynamics of Space Hight (Heat Transfer
Phenomena in Space) NASA TM X-51282, March 25, 1963.
Edwards, D. K., J. T. Gier, K. E. Nelson, and R. D. Roddick, "Integrating Sphere for Imperfectly
Diffuse Samples," Applied Optics, 51, November 1961.
3. Johnson, F. S., "'The Solar Constant," J. of Meteorology, I 1, 1954.
. Fussell, W. B., J. J. Triolo, and J. H. Henninger, "A Dynamic Thermal Vacuum Technique for
Measuring the Solar Absorptance and Thermal Emittan_ of Spacecraft Coatings," GSFC
TN D-1716, March 1963.
. Dunkle, R. V., D. K. Edwards, J. T. Gier, K. E. Nelson, and R. D. Roddick, "Heated Cavity
Reflectometer for Angular Reflectance Measurements," Prog. in International Research on
Thermo and Transport Properties, ASME, 1962.
6. Heaney, James B., and John H. Henninger, "A Method of Treating the Non-Grey Error in
Total Emittance Measurements," GSFC TN D-6501, December 1971.
7. Jakob, M., Heat Transfer, Vol. !, John Wiley Company, New York, 1962.
8. Engineering Services Division Facility Handbook, Goddard Space Hight Center, January 1981.
"RECEDING PAGE BI, ANK NOT FILMED
43
®