1
University of Dar es Salaam Albertus-Magnus- Universität zu Köln Kenya Reconciling future food production with environmental protection http://www.wetlands-africa.de Project Management Structure Soil attributes and dynamics FKZ 031A250 A-H 6 Scaling Rationale The availability of nutrients and water determines soil quality parameters and the production potential for crops. We compare different wetland management practices regarding their effects on carbon sequestration, nitrogen retention, soil organic C stabilization, and nutrient balances. Moreover, soil-atmosphere gas fluxes are measured and used as sustainability indicators for soil organic matter stability, the closeness or openness of the nitrogen cycle and the redox status of the soil. The effects of several agricultural treatments are being studied at the super test sites in the central experiment at three hydrological situations (0-2 [Fringe], 2-4 [Middle], 4-6 months [Center] of water suturation) on the dynamics of C and N between pedosphere and atmosphere. Results: Center Position a) Mean + SD of CO 2 (n=3), b) mean + SD of CH 4 (n=3) c) mean + SD of N 2 O (n=3), d) mean of redox potential in Center position (n=3) Focus Methods The intensive monitoring program of three different hydrological wetland situations includes: - biweekly observation of GHG emissions by static chamber method - biweekly analysis of nitrogen and ammonia content - continuous measurement of redox-potential and temperature - density fractionation of SOM in profiles - pre- and post-crop observation of soil attributes The aim is to measure seasonal and spatial changes in soil nutrient availability and greenhouse gas emissions. Highlights Gleysols in valleys are more “fertile” than Fluvisols in floodplains. GHG fluxes (CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O) are highly variable between treatments Fe content is higher in the topsoil of fringe than in center positions No clear pattern (treatment or position effects) were apparent for C and N stocks Soil profiles Left: C-Stock and Fringe-Profile; Middle: N-Stock and Middle- Profile; Right: Organic-Matter Stock and Center-Profile Contact: Sabine FIEDLER Nicolas BRÜGGEMANN Authors: B. GLASNER and K. W AGNER

Soil attributes and dynamics - uni-bonn.de

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Soil attributes and dynamics - uni-bonn.de

University of

Dar es Salaam

Albertus-Magnus-Universität

zu Köln

Kenya

Reconciling future food production with environmental protection

http://www.wetlands-africa.de Project Management Structure

Soil attributes and dynamics

1

2

4

FKZ 031A250 A-H

3

6

Sca

ling

Rationale

The availability of nutrients and water determines

soil quality parameters and the production potential

for crops. We compare different wetland

management practices regarding their effects on

carbon sequestration, nitrogen retention, soil

organic C stabilization, and nutrient balances.

Moreover, soil-atmosphere gas fluxes are

measured and used as sustainability indicators for

soil organic matter stability, the closeness or

openness of the nitrogen cycle and the redox

status of the soil. The effects of several agricultural

treatments are being studied at the super test sites

in the central experiment at three hydrological

situations (0-2 [Fringe], 2-4 [Middle], 4-6 months

[Center] of water suturation) on the dynamics of C

and N between pedosphere and atmosphere.

Results: Center Position

a) Mean + SD of CO2 (n=3), b) mean + SD of CH4 (n=3)

c) mean + SD of N2O (n=3), d) mean of redox potential in Center

position (n=3)

Focus

Methods

The intensive monitoring program of three different

hydrological wetland situations includes:

- biweekly observation of GHG emissions by

static chamber method

- biweekly analysis of nitrogen and ammonia

content

- continuous measurement of redox-potential and

temperature

- density fractionation of SOM in profiles

- pre- and post-crop observation of soil attributes

The aim is to measure seasonal and spatial

changes in soil nutrient availability and greenhouse

gas emissions.

Highlights

Gleysols in valleys are more “fertile”

than Fluvisols in floodplains.

GHG fluxes (CO2, CH4, N2O) are highly

variable between treatments

Fe content is higher in the topsoil of

fringe than in center positions

No clear pattern (treatment or position

effects) were apparent for C and N

stocks

Soil profiles

Left: C-Stock and Fringe-Profile; Middle: N-Stock and Middle-

Profile; Right: Organic-Matter Stock and Center-Profile

Contact: Sabine FIEDLER

Nicolas BRÜGGEMANN Authors: B. GLASNER and K. WAGNER