View
221
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Software Agent-communication-
Outline
• Overview
• Speech act theory
• Agent communication languages
• Summary
2/35
Example: Personal Assistant Agent (PA)
• Task: organize an evening with Heikki
• What is needed?– Participants’ calendar info– Info about restaurants, pubs, etc.– Weather forecast
Multi-agent System
3/35
Example: Organizing Evening (1)
Calendar
PAA
DA
Who takes care of Heikki’s Calendar?
It is HCA and address is http:…; MTP is…; Presentation is …; CL is…; Ontology is …; …
HCA
Give me Heikki’s free evenings in this week?
Heikki is free on Tuesday and Friday evening
4/35
Example: Organizing Evening (2)
Calendar
PAA
HCA
I want to book Friday evening
Tuesday evening booked
No, I don’t want to book Friday evening
I want to book Tuesday evening
5/35
Example: Sending a Message to an Agent
Allocate time from Heikki’s calendar
Find out Heikki’s calendar agent
Who takes care of Heikki’s Calendar?
To: DF@HAP Query Heikki Calendar Ser-vice
6/35
Layered Model
7/35
Agent Communication Language
• Definition– An agent communication language (ACL) allows agents to communicate with each
other about their positions and actions– An agents communication language (ACL) provides agents with a means of ex-
changing information and knowledge
• Earlier attempts at seamless exchange of information and knowledge between applications
– e.g. Remote Procedure Calls, Remote Method Invocation, CORBA
• Differences between the above and ACLs are– Semantic complexity– ACLs can handle propositions, rules and actions instead of simple objects with no
semantics associated with them– An ACL message describes a desired state in a declarative language, rather than a
procedure or a method
8/35
Agent Communication
• Agents have conversations (as opposed to exchange single mes-sages), e.g.
– Task-oriented– Negotiations
• A higher level conceptualization of an agent’s strategies drive an agent’s communicative behavior
• Message type of agents : Speech acts
9/35
Speech Acts (1)
• Communication in MAS is inspired by speech act theory
• Speech act theories are pragmatic theories of language– They attempt to account for how language is used by people every day to achieve
their goals and intentions– The origin of speech act theories are usually traced to the work of the philosopher
John Austin• Austin noticed that some utterances are like ”physical actions” that appear to change the
state of the world. e.g.– Declaring war– ”I now pronounce you man and wife”
• In general, every thing we utter is uttered with the intention of satisfying some goal or in-tention
– A theory of how utterances are used to achieve intentions is a speech act theory
10/35
Speech Acts (2)
• Austin distinguished 3 different aspects of speech acts:– Locutionary act - act of making an utterance
• e.g. saying ”please make some tea” ’– Illocutionary act – action performed in saying something
• e.g. he requested me to make some tea– Perlocution – effect of the act
• e.g. he got me to make tea
• Searle identified 5 different types of speech acts:
Speech Act Type Description and Example
Representatives or AssertivesInforming
e.g. ”It is raining”.
DirectivesSpeaker tries to make the hearer do something
e.g. ”Please close the window”
CommisivesCommits the speaker to future action
e.g. ”I will close the window”
ExpressivesSpeaker expresses a mental statee.g. ”Excuse me”, ”congratulations”
DeclarativesEffect some changes
e.g. ”I name this city Trondheim”
11/35
Speech Acts (3)
• In general, speech acts can be seen to have 2 components:– A performative verb
• e.g. Request, inform– Propositional content
• e.g. ”the window is closed”
Speech Act Please close the door The door is closed Is the door closed?
Performative request inform inquire
Content the door is closed the door is closed the door is closed
12/35
Speech Acts (4)
• How does one define the semantics of speech acts? When can one say someone has uttered, e.g. a request or an inform?
• How can the properties of speech acts be represented such that planning systems could reason about them?
• Speech acts are treated as physical actions– Actions are characterised via preconditions and postconditions– Semantics for request: request(s,h,)
• Pre:– s believes h can do
(you don’t ask someone to do something unless you think that they can do it)– s believes h believes h can do
(you don’t ask someone unless they believe they can do it)– s believes s wants
(you don’t ask someone unless you want it!)
• Post:– h believes s believes s wants
(the effect is to make them aware of your desire)
13/35
Agent Communication Language (ACL)
• ACLs allow agents to effectively communicate and exchange knowledge with other agents
• Three important aspects– Syntax: How the symbols of
communication are structured– Semantics: What the symbols denote– Pragmatics: How the symbols are
interpreted
Agenti Agentj
Convert to transport
form
Convert to transport
form
Message delivery/transportation service
Goal G
Intent I
Perform-ative
Message
(Meaning is a combination of
semantics and pragmatics)
14/35
Communication Levels
• Requirements for an ACL– Syntactic translation between
languages– Semantic content preservation
among applications• The concept must have a uniform
meaning across applications.– Ability to communicate complex
attitudes about their information and knowledge.
• Agents need to question, request, etc.
• Not about transporting bits and bytes.
Syntax
Format of information being transferred
Semantics
Meaning of the information
Communication
Method of interconnection
15/35
Origins of ACLs
• Knowledge Sharing Effort (KSE), funded by ARPA– Central concept: knowledge sharing requires communication, which in turn requires
a common language. KSE focused on defining that common language
• KQML: Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language– Language for both message formatting and message handling protocols
• KIF: Knowledge Interchange Format– Language for expressing message content
16/35
KIF
• Creation of a common language for expressing properties– Intended to express contents of a message; not the message itself– Based on first-order logic
• Using KIF, it’s possible to express:– Properties of things in a domain (e.g. Michael is a vegetarian)– Relationships between things in a domain (e.g. Michael and Janine are married)– General properties of a domain (e.g. Everybody has a mother)
• Example– Relation between 2 objects:
• The temperature of m1 is 83 Celsius:– (= (temperature m1) (scalar 83 Celsius))
– Definition of new concept:• An object is a bachelor if this object is a man and not married:
– (defrelation bachelor (?x) := (and (man ?x) (not (married ?x))))
– Relationship between individuals in the domain:• A person with the property of being a person also has the property of being a mammal:
– (defrelation (person ?x) :=> (mammal ?X))
17/35
KQML: Overview
• An “outer language” that defines a set of performatives (communica-tive acts), such as ask, reply
• Performatives form the core of the language:– Determine the kinds of interactions one can have with KQML-speaking agents– Identify the protocol to be used to deliver the message– Signify that the content is an assertion, a query, a command or another speech act– Describe how the sender would like any reply to be delivered
CommunicationMechanics of communication, e.g. Sender, receiver.
Performatives (message layer)
Content of communication,e.g. a KIF expression
Content
Logic of communication, e.g. ask, tell.
e.g.
(ask-if :sender agenti
:receiver agentj
:language Prolog
:ontology genealogy
:content “spouse(adam, eve)”)
18/35
KQML: Categories of Performatives
Category Performatives
Basic Query evaluate, ask-if, ask-one, ask-all, ask-about
Multi-response Query stream-about, stream-all
Response reply, sorry
Generic informational tell, achieve, cancel, untell
Generator standby, ready, next,rest, discard, generator
Capability-definition advertise, subscribe, monitor, import, export
Networking register, unregister, forward, broadcast, route
19/35
KQML: Example
(evaluate:sender A : receiver B:language KIF: ontology motors:reply-with q1 :content (val (torque m1)))
(reply:sender B : receiver A:language KIF: ontology motors:in-reply-to q1 :content (= (torque m1) (scalar 12 kgf)))
(stream-about:sender A : receiver B:language KIF: ontology motors:reply-with q1 :content (m1)
(tell:sender B : receiver A:in-reply-to q1 :content (= (torque m1) (scalar 12 kgf)))
(tell:sender B : receiver A:in-reply-to q1 :content (= (status m1) (normal)))
(eos:sender B : receiver A:in-reply-to q1)
20/35
Facilitators
• KQML environments (may) contain facilitators that help make the communication protocol transparent
• Facilitators: a special class of agents that perform useful communica-tion services such as:
– Maintain registry of service names– Forward messages to named services– Routing messages based on content– Provide matchmaking between information providers and seekers– Provide mediation and translation services
21/35
Facilitators: Example (1)
A B
F
ask(X)
tell(X)
Point-to-point protocol
A is aware that it is appropriate
to send a query about X to B
There are several ways to
achieve this via a Facilitator.
22/35
Facilitators: Example (2)
A B
F
tell(X)
subscribe(ask(X)) tell(X) Using the subscribe performative
Request that Facilitator F monitor for
the truth of X. If B subsequently informs
F that it believes X to be true, then F
can in turn inform A
23/35
Facilitators: Example (3)
A B
Ftell(X) ask(X)
broker(ask(X))
advertise(ask(X))
tell(X)Using the broker performative
A Asks Facilitator to find another
agent which can process a given
performative
24/35
Facilitators: Example (4)
A B
Fask(X)
recruit(tell(X))
advertise(ask(X))
tell(X)
Using the rercruit performative
Asks Facilitator to find an appropriate
agent to which an embedded
performative can be forwarded. A
reply is returned directly to the original
agent
25/35
Facilitators: Example (5)
A B
Freply(B)
ask(X)
tell(X)
recommend(ask(X)) advertise(ask(X))
Using the recommend performative
Asks Facilitator to respond with the
”name” of another agent which is
appropriate for sending a particular
performative.
26/35
Discussion on KQML
• Weak semantics of performatives – Different implementations of KQML could not interoperate
• Transportation mechanisms were not defined
• Lacked the class of performatives: commissives– Difficult to implement multi-agent scenarios without commissives
• Set of performatives was large and ad hoc– Recently, more efforts have been made to provide formal semantics in terms of
preconditions, postconditions and completion conditions (ref: Labrou et. al., 1999.)
27/35
FIPA
• The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) is a non-profit association
• FIPA’s purpose is to promote the success of emerging agent-based applications, services and equipment
• FIPA operates through the open international collaboration of member organizations: companies, universities and government organizations
28/35
FIPA ACL (1)
• Basic structure is quite similar to KQML:– Performative (communicative act)
• 20 performatives in FIPA ACL– Housekeeping
• e.g. Sender– Content
• the actual content of the message
• Message structure (Envelope):– Comprises of a collection of parameters– Contains at least the mandatory to and sender pa-
rameters
• Example FIPA ACL message
Envelope(transport information)
Message body(ACL message)
(inform:sender agentA:receiver agentB:content (price good200 150):language sl:ontology hpl-auction
)
29/35
FIPA ACL (2)
• Inform and request– Inform and Request are the two basic performatives in FIPA ACL. All others are
macro definitions, defined in terms of these– The meaning of inform and request are defined in 2 parts:
• Precondition: What must be true in order for the speech act to succeed• Rational effect: What the sender of the message hopes to bring about
Inform Request
Content statement action
Precondition •Holds that the content is true.
•Intends that the recipient believe the content
•Does not already believe that the recipient is aware whether content is true or not
•Intends action content to be performed
•Believes recipient is capable of performing this action•Does not believe that sender already intends to perform action
30/35
FIPA Message Transport Model
Agent Platform
Agent Communication Channel
Agent A Agent Platform
Agent Communication Channel
Agent B
Message Transport Protocol
ACL message sentover the Message Transport Service
31/35
FIPA Sending Messages
• 3 options– Via local ACC– Via remote ACC– Direct communication mechanism
Agent Platform
Agent Communication Channel
Agent A Agent Platform
Agent Communication Channel
Agent B
1 1&21
2
3
32/35
FIPA Agent Interaction Protocol (1)
• Ongoing conversations between agents fall into typical patterns. In such cases, certain message sequences are expected, and at any point in the conversation, other messages are expected to follow.
– These typical patterns of message exchange are called protocols
(request :sender A:receiver B:content some-act:protocol fipa-contract-net
)
reject-proposalreason
Not-understood refusereason
proposepreconditions2
cfp actionpreconditions1
accept-proposalproposal
failurereason
informDone(action)
cancelreason
Deadline for proposals
Manager cancelsthe contract
due to a change
manager
Potential contractors
33/35
FIPA Agent Interaction Protocol (2)
Potential contractors
Manager
cfp
refuse
not-understood
propose
reject-proposal
accept-proposal
cancel
inform
deadline
34/35
Comparison between KQML & FIPA ACL
• Similarities:– Separation of the outer language (performative) and the inner language (content).– Allows for any content language
• Differences– Communication primitives:
• KQML – performative• FIPA ACL – communicative act
– Different semantic frameworks – impossible to come up with an exact mapping or transformation between KQML and FIPA performatives
– KQML provides facilitator services; FIPA ACL does not
35/35
Summary
• Agent communication– Speech act theory– Agent communication languages
• Open issues– How do we verify whether an agent complies with the semantic definition?
• E.g. If an agent sends a message ( say inform Ф), how do we know whether the agent be-lieve Ф or not
– Is sincerity a tall-order for agent society?• E.g negotiation
– Can we specify semantics without a context?• E.g. Query If in an oral examination setting• We need a context (protocol)
• Next lecture: Application & review
36/35