Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Social-cost-benefit analysis of DC grids
how did we come to this day
Presenter and author: E. (Epko) Horstman MBSE BEng
Building Services Research Institute
Mauritius 12, Zoetermeer, Netherlands, www.bsri.eu
Round table 17 May 2018
24, Rue De Mot, 1040 Brussels
Round table Organised by EC DG, Unit C2 - New energy technologies, innovation and clean coal
2
How did we come to this day
Smart Grids;
Smart meters;
Energy Efficiency;
Demand Side Response;
DSM from distribution customers;
Business models for emerging energy applications (smart heat, electric vehicles, energy storage);
Barriers to market for the demand side.
3
How did we come to this day
Quotes
Smart Grids have a major contribution…
Will involve a variety of parties..
.. The critical key element will be the demand response of consumers..
..unclear how the benefits in the system will pass to the consumer
Households
Utility (large)
DSO
Society
Utility (small)
Industry
E suppliers
Costs Costs Costs
4
How did we come to this day
The DC alternative
DSM by simple voltage control;
Naturally congestion management;
More privacy, no big data;
More power over existing cables, less grid reinforcement;
Energy/material/space savings;
Higher lifespan/reliability;
Equipment often DC-ready;
TM
Households
Utility (large)
DSO
Society
Utility (small)
Industry
E suppliers
Costs Costs Costs Costs
5
How did we come to this day
The DC alternative
Could DC Grids have a even more major contribution…
Would it involve less parties..
Costs and benefits in the system more equally shared..
No critical demand response of consumers..
Naturally
Who benefits mostHouseholds
Utility (large)
DSO
Society
Utility (small)
Industry
E suppliers
Costs Costs Costs Costs
6
72 Billion euro more benefit?
Faster decarbonisation?
Relevance of this day
7
Independent and fair comparison
Dynamic approach
Topology
Powerhouse;
DE generation
World is not standing still
η power electronics;
More grid congestion;
Cheaper and safer storage
Member State differences
Existing infrastructure;
Energy tax policy;
People/m2
Exclude non proven technologies
Mid term innovations/trends
8
9
More and more DC applications
10
Playing with DC applications
11
Working on game-changers
12
Independent and fair comparison
Frameworks
CPB/NEI, 2000/ISO26000
many variables…
The Success Factor (sCBA)
Boundaries
Do not overclaim
Value what matters
Involve both parties
13
Why
Why?
For (macro - nano)grid planning and related investments, it is important to have an insight of the new technologies supporting different grid architecture and topology and to identify the related socio-economic costs and benefits.
14
Why
Key research question
‘what current carrier (AC, DC or Hybrid) on which level in the electricity network can accelerate the European Union (EU)’s Member States in achieving the ambitious security of supply, sustainability and competitiveness targets defined in the EU energy policies, with the most desirable socio-economic costs and benefits.’
15
Objective of this day
Answer
‘is it legitimate to state that direct current could play an accelerating role in favour of socio-economic benefits and the environment?’
What is expected of you?
Share experiences;
Interact with respect;
Value what matters;
16
Program of this day
How
I. Overview of AC & DC technologies and the EU grid
II. AC & DC technologies and applications
III. DC real life demonstrations
IV. Panel session Technical, social, cost & benefit perspective
Is it legitimate to state that:
‘direct current could play an accelerating role in favour of socio-economic benefits and the
environment.’