Simulator International Working Group

Results and Adoption Status

Stéphane ClémentCAE & IWG Co-Chairman

EATS 2009, Prague

2 2

Result: New ICAO Document can be used now!

3

ICAO

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

Starting Point New ICAOFSTD TypesFAA EASA ICAO

PC ATD

NG DSD

Basic ATD BITD

Adv ATD

FTD 1 FNPT I

FTD 2 FNPT II

FTD 3 FNPT MCC

FTD 4 FTD 1

FTD 5 FTD 2

FTD 6

FTD 7

A A

B B

C C

D D Level II

IWG

FSTD Type Rationalisation

5

MPL3

(T+TP)MPL2

(T+TP)IR

(T)

PPL, MPL1, CPL

(All T)

RAeS Sept 0919/04/23 5

High-Level Requirements for ICAO Standard FSTDsColor legend Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V Type VII Type VII

SpecificSpecificRepresent.Represent.

GenericGeneric

Class

Rating

(T)

TR, ATPLMPL4

RE, RO, RLIO, CQ

(TP)

Cockpit & Structure

Class, enclosed

Generic,Open

Class, enclosed

Class, enclosed

Aircraft replica,

enclosed

Class, enclosed

Aircraft replica,

enclosed

Instruments & Panels

Flat Panel & Overlay Hi QualityFlat Panel& Overlay

+Full 3D replication

Non sim area Open Enclosed

Visual display

200 x 40 Direct

45 x 30 Flat Screen

200 x 40 Direct

45 x 30 Flat Screen

200 x 40

Direct

200 x 40 Collimated

Motion None Reduced 6 DOF

Full

6 DOF

Flt & Flt Ctrl Class rep.

Generic Class rep.

Generic Aircraft Specific

Class rep. Aircraft Specific

AircraftSystems

Aircraft Representative (Required Procedures)

Specific (All proc.)

Class rep. Specific (All proc.)

Air Traffic Control

None Background Chatter

None Background Chatter

Background Chatter

+ Dynamic Automated

Environment

None

200 x 40 Collimated

+ Dynamic ATC

Environment

High Quality

Flat Panel &

Overlay

Enclosed

TR, ATPLIO,

RO, RL(All T)

7

ICAO doc 9625: international baseline for NAA Standards

1990 1993 1996 2003 2010

FAA 120-40C DRAFT

1993

ICAO 9625 Issue 1

1995

ICAO 9625Issue 2

2003

JAR STD-1A

Initial1995

FAR Part60

CAA CAP453

FAA 120-40B1991

CASA FSD-1

RAeSRAeSIQTGIQTG19951995

ICAO 9625Issue 3

2009

FAR Part60

Change 2

JAR STD-1A

Amdt 3

2003 JAR-FSTD A

2009

2009

EASAEASA

CS-FSTD A

2010

?

8

IWG Adoption Status - November 2009

NAA CountryIWG

Member?

Formally Briefed

?Supportive

?Implementation Status

ICAO ANC ICAO YES YES Published 9625 Ed. 3 in July 2009

UK CAALBA, Fr DGAC, etc.

EASA States

YES YES Awaiting conclusion of current NPA22 process.

FAA USA YES YES Draft Part 60 Change 2 in progress.

TC Canada YES YES Drafting regulations -in progress

NZCAA New Zealand

YES YES Stated intent to incorporate in 2010

JCAB Japan YES Stated intent to incorporate in 2010

KCAA Korea Stated intent to incorporate in 2010

CAACHKCAD

China YES YES

CASA Australia YES YES Phase 1 – adopt types I to IVPhase 2 – adopt types V to VII

CC FSTD Russia YES

DGCA India YES YES

9 9

Why is this important?ICAO 9625 Edition 3, Vol. 1 (Aeroplane) enables... Expansion of international standards from highest-fidelity FSTD

(Type VII) to most basic type of FSTD (Type I) Reduction of number of FSTD Types (from 20+ to 7) FSTDs tailored to the training tasks for which they are used Clear links between pilot licences + ratings and FSTD types Evaluation methodology for Full Task device (Part 2) and also for

Part Task device (Part 3) Evaluation of any type or vintage of FSTD for training suitability International harmonization (effectiveness & efficiency)

Same flight test cases, same QTG Consistent training capability with FSTDs

Will facilitate mutual recognition (efficiency) Will benefit the pilot training community

10

Manual of Criteria for the

Qualification of FSTDs

ICAO 9625 Edition 3 - Documentation Structure

Part 1

Training Task Derived Flight

Simulation Requirements

Part 2

Flight Simulation

Training Device Criteria

(FSTD Types 1 to 7)

Part 3

Flight Simulation Feature and

Fidelity Level Criteria

Volume 1

Aeroplanes

Volume 2

Helicopters

55%done

11

Approx 80 delegates from 16 countries Regulatory community ( > 8 countries) Industry bodies (RAeS, FSEMC, IATA, ICAO,…) Pilot associations (IFALPA, ALPA,…) Operators (Aircraft & FSTDs) Manufacturers (Aicraft & FSTDs)

Many meetings, many sponsors Industry Wide Briefings

WATS, EATS, APATS, FSEMC, RAeS, ICAO, EASA, JAA, FAA, CAAC, CASA

2006-2009 Aeroplane IWG Effort

Largest ever FSTD industry harmonization effort

Industry lead effort, estimated 10 Million Euros

12 12

Also the RAeS Aeroplane FSTD Evaluation Handbook

Volume 1 – Objective Testing

Revision 4 will align with ICAO 9625 rev. 3.

Available soon, in 2009.

Volume 2 - Function & Subjective Testing

In draft Available Q1 2010.

13

Also the IATA FSTD Data Document

IATA FSTD Design and Performance Data Requirements

The 7th edition of the document was published on August 2009.

IATA Data Document is the industry standard for FSTD data requirements

14

All the pieces of the puzzle fitting together

+ + = 100%

ICAO9625FSTD Standards

+ +RAeSFSTD EvaluationHandbook

= 100%IATAFSTD Data RequirementsDocument

A coherent and harmonised set of documents

15

Summary – ICAO Letter to the Royal Aeronautical Society

16

If you want more details – be in London next week!

17

Thank you

18 18

Regulatory changes EASA from JAA FAA Part 60

Lack of harmonization Lower Level Devices Rotary wing FSTDs

New aircraft types

New training types MPL No clarity of FSTD

New technologies Electric Motion LCOS Projectors

Regulations were increasingly out of step with technology (airplane & FSTD) and with new pilot training methodologies

Why Did We Do it ?

19

Methodology – Step 1 – Training Task Analysis

EASA/ICAO/FAA training task lists

MPL1,2,3,4 Multi-crew Pilot License

IR Initial Instrument Rating

PPL Private Pilots License

CPL Commercial Pilots License

CR Class Rating

TR Type Rating

RL Recurrent License (Training & Checking)

RO Recurrent Operator (Training & Checking)

Re Recency

(Take-off and Landing)

CQ Continuing Qualification

IO Initial Operator

Training (T) –

The FSTD feature fidelity levels required for each listed task that supports the training objective.

Training to Proficiency (TP) –

The FSTD feature fidelity levels required for each listed task that supports the training objective to proficiency and allow testing and checking towards the issue of a licence, rating, or qualification.

Agreed training tasks and training types to support licence and rating requirements

20

Methodology – Step 2 - Simulation Features

Aircraft Systems

Flight Model – Aero & Engine

Ground Handling

Flight Controls &

Forces

Cockpit layout

Aircraft Simulation

VisualCue

MotionCue

SoundCue

Cueing Simulation

EnvironmentATC

Environment Simulation

EnvironmentWeather

EnvironmentNavigation

EnvironmentAerodrome & Terrain

Agreed list of simulation features elements required to support any individual training task

21

Methodology – Step 3 - Training Task Matrix Concept

Combine data from Steps 1, and 2 into a single matrix

Fidelity Levels (4)None

GenericRepresentative

Specific

Use matrix to determine FSTD feature and fidelity requirements by training task

Tra

inin

g T

yp

es

(1

4)

& T

as

ks

(~1

50

)

FSTD Simulation Features (12)