22
Page | 1 Simulation of Methanol Production from Synthesis Gas Dr. Ruhul Amin, Imran Hassan, Avijit Das, RabetaYeasmin, Taslima Rahman, Tania Hossain Department of Chemical Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh. Abstract An innovative process scheme to produce methanol from carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide is here presented and accessed via simulation.In this configuration, the synthesis gas stream, composed by CO, CO 2 , and H 2 and fed to the methanol synthesis reactor, is produced by means of a reverse-water–gas-shift by which a CO stream is partially converted in carbon dioxide. A simulation model is applied to define the proper operating conditions to achieve synthesis gas composition targets. The simulation results show that the plant configuration represents a feasible way to produce methanol using carbon dioxide, competitively with the traditional process in which the synthesis gas is produced by a natural gas steam reforming unit.From the simulation, some graphs were plotted. These graphs showed the dependency of simulation on variables (temperature, pressure etc).This were useful to understand the changes that will occur

Simulation of Methanol Production from Synthesis Gas

  • Upload
    lytuyen

  • View
    260

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

P a g e | 1

Simulation of Methanol Production from Synthesis Gas

Dr. Ruhul Amin, Imran Hassan, Avijit Das, RabetaYeasmin, Taslima Rahman, Tania Hossain

Department of Chemical Engineering

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.

Abstract

An innovative process scheme to produce methanol from carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide is

here presented and accessed via simulation.In this configuration, the synthesis gas stream,

composed by CO, CO2, and H2 and fed to the methanol synthesis reactor, is produced by means

of a reverse-water–gas-shift by which a CO stream is partially converted in carbon dioxide.

A simulation model is applied to define the proper operating conditions to achieve synthesis gas

composition targets. The simulation results show that the plant configuration represents a

feasible way to produce methanol using carbon dioxide, competitively with the traditional

process in which the synthesis gas is produced by a natural gas steam reforming unit.From the

simulation, some graphs were plotted. These graphs showed the dependency of simulation on

variables (temperature, pressure etc).This were useful to understand the changes that will occur if

properties of each unit were changed. Since pilot plants are expensive for this type of case,

HYSYS gives us an opportunity to observe and realize the plant and the process happening

inside. From the plots, optimum conditions for methanol production are found to be reactor

temperature 200-300oC, reactor pressure 40-50atm.

Keywords:Methanol; Synthesis Gas; Production of methanol; Purification; Simulation; Recycling.

P a g e | 2

1. Introduction

Methanol, also known as methyl alcohol, wood alcohol, wood naphtha or wood spirits, is

a chemical with the formula C H 3O H . Methanol acquired the name "wood alcohol" because it

was once produced chiefly as a byproduct of the destructive distillation of wood. At room

temperature, it is a polar liquid, and is used as an antifreeze, solvent, fuel, and as

a denaturant for ethanol. It is also used for producing biodiesel via transesterification reaction.

From paints and plastics, furniture and carpeting, to car parts and windshield wash fluid,

methanol is a chemical building block used in making hundreds of products that touch our daily

lives. 

Methanol is a light, colorless, flammable liquid at room temperature, and contains less carbon

and more hydrogen than any other liquid fuel. It is a stable biodegradable chemical that is

produced and shipped around the globe everyday for a number of industrial and commercial

applications. Methanol occurs naturally in the environment, and quickly breaks down in both

aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The methanol industry spans the entire globe, with production

in Asia, North and South America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Worldwide, over 100

methanol plants have a combined production capacity of about 100 million metric tons (33

billion gallons or 125 billion liters), and each day more than 180,000 tons of methanol is used as

a chemical feedstock or as a transportation fuel (60 million gallons or 225 million liters). The

global methanol industry generates $36 billion in economic activity each year, while creating

over 100,000 jobs around the globe.

Methanol is produced naturally in the anaerobic metabolism of many varieties of bacteria, and is

commonly present in small amounts in the environment. As a result, there is a small fraction of

methanol vapor in the atmosphere. Over the course of several days, atmospheric methanol

is oxidized with the help of sunlight to carbon dioxide and water. [1]

In a typical plant, methanol production is carried out in three steps. The first step is to convert the

feedstock natural gas into a synthesis gas stream consisting of CO, CO2, H2O and hydrogen. This

is usually accomplished by the catalytic reforming of feed gas and steam. Partial oxidation is

another possible route. The second step is the catalytic synthesis of methanol from the synthesis

gas. Each of these steps can be carried out in a number of ways and various technologies offer a

P a g e | 3

spectrum of possibilities which may be most suitable for any desired application. And, the final

step is distillation of the final product to obtain required product specification. [2][4]

 Computer based simulation has been popular now-a-days for different chemical engineering

purposes. Though our task was to represent production of methanol in renowned aspen HYSYS

software, making some assumptions and using hypothetical reactors we have performed the

methanol production simulation. Though it does not give the real world performance or the real

life production environment, but it can give relief from making wide range of experiment

without making the small scale reactors or plant. Here, a short literature review of methanol

synthesis and its kinetics and modeling is presented. The simulators for the process are

developed based on the models from the literature. The simulators are used to evaluate the steady

state behavior of the process even though the mutual agreement about the reaction mechanism

has not been established and thus the reliability of the results cannot be evaluated. The evaluation

of the results will be carried out later when the applicability of the models found from the

literature will be studied with the process data.

P a g e | 4

2. Methodology

2.1 Process Description

The process chain for producing methanol is rather simple including the following phases

• Production of synthesis gas

• Conversion of synthesis gas to methanol and

• Distillation of the final product to obtain required product specification. [3]

2.2 Production of synthesis gas

Synthesis gas is a fuel gas mixture consisting primarily of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and very

often some carbon dioxide. CO, CO2 and H2 produced from various sources through steam

reforming, partial oxidation, CO2 reforming or auto thermal reforming [Lovik 2001]. Originally,

synthesis gas for the production of methanol came from coal. Today, synthesis gas is most

commonly produced from the methane component in natural gas, because natural gas contains

hydrogen. Three processes are commercially practiced. At moderate pressures of 4 MPa (40 atm)

and high temperatures (around 850 °C), methane reacts with steam on a nickel catalyst to

produce synthesis gas according to the chemical equation:

CH4 + H2O → CO + 3 H2

This reaction, commonly called steam-methane reforming or SMR, is endothermic, and the heat

transfer limitations place limits on the size of and pressure in the catalytic reactors used. Methane

can also undergo partial oxidation with molecular oxygen (at atmospheric pressure) to produce

synthesis gas, as the following equation shows:

2 CH4 + O2 → 2 CO + 4 H2

This reaction is exothermic, and the heat given off can be used in-situ to drive the steam-methane

reforming reaction. When the two processes are combined, it is referred to as autothermal

reforming. The high pressures and high temperatures needed for steam-reforming require a

greater capital investment in equipment than is needed for a simple partial-oxidation process;

however, the energy-efficiency of steam-reforming is higher than for partial-oxidation, unless the

waste-heat from partial-oxidation is used. [5][6]

In methanol synthesis, either CO or CO2 or both hydrogenates to methanol. The reactions are

[Klier 1982]

P a g e | 5

CO + 2H2↔CH3OH (1)

CO2+ 3H2 ↔CH3OH + H2O (2)

Also the water gas shift reaction may occur [Skrzypek 1995].The water gas shift reaction is

CO + H2O → CO2 + H2 (3) [7]

The production of methanol is strongly influenced by thermodynamics. The thermodynamic

equilibrium limits the process to a low conversion and thus the recycling of the outlet is required

if a high conversion is desired. The overall reaction is also strongly exothermic and thus a

significant cooling is required. The recycling and the cooling are the main causes of the

investment costs. The methanol synthesis reactors have been designed based on three principles-

the high cooling demand, the low pressure drop and the favourable economy of scale. [Lange

2001]. Equilibrium constant of reactions depend largely on temperatures. For equation (1)

equilibrium constant vs. temperature graph is shown below:

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 9000

500100015002000250030003500400045005000

Keq 1 vs Temperature

Keq 1

Temperature (°C)

Keq

Table 01: Variation of equilibrium constant of reaction 1 with temperature

Figure 01: Keq1 vs. Temperature plot

Temperature(°C) Keq 137.8 457493.3 20.5148.9 0.349204.4 1.44E-02260 1.11E-03315.6 1.34E-04371.1 2.29E-05426.7 5.09E-06482.2 1.40E-06537.8 4.54E-07593.3 1.70E-07648.9 7.11E-08704.4 3.28E-08760 1.64E-08815.6 8.80E-09

P a g e | 6

For equation (2) equilibrium constant vs. temperature graph is shown below:

The production of methanol from synthesis gas may take place under the low or high pressure.

The high pressure process operates typically at 200 atm and 350°C while the low pressure

process operates at 50 - 100 atm and 220 - 250°C. The low pressure process has such economical

and operational benefits that almost all the methanol plants built after year 1967 operate at the

low pressure. [Klier 1982] [9]

0 200 400 600 800 10000.00E+00

1.00E-02

2.00E-02

3.00E-02

4.00E-02

5.00E-02

6.00E-02

7.00E-02

8.00E-02

9.00E-02

1.00E-01

Keq 2

Temperature (°C)

Keq

2

Table 02: Variation of equilibrium constant of reaction 2 with temperature

Temperature(°C) Keq 237.8 9.12E-0293.3 4.52E-03148.9 4.46E-04204.4 7.00E-05260 1.53E-05315.6 4.27E-06371.1 1.44E-06426.7 5.65E-07482.2 2.49E-07537.8 1.21E-07593.3 6.40E-08648.9 3.62E-08704.4 2.17E-08760 1.37E-08815.6 8.98E-09

P a g e | 7

Some of the units used in HYSYS are given below:

Mixer: Mixes two or more fluid stream input and gives one output.

Heater: This unit heats up the feed to desired temperature by specifying the pressure drop and

outlet pressure.

Methanol synthesis reactor (MSR): It is an equilibrium reactor chosen from the library. It is

used for the equilibrium reaction sets only. This reactor is valid both for exothermic and

endothermic reactions. It is also possible to maintain a constant temperature in the reactor by

removing or supplying heat.

Cooler: It is used to cool the process stream to desired temperature.

Separator: It is used for separating liquid and vapor mixture in given process stream at a

constant temperature or by inputting or removing heat. It is also possible to add reaction sets

here.

Distillation column: It is the most versatile tool in HYSYS. Any kind of distillation is possible

in this unit. It works by separating most volatile components from a process feed. [8]

P a g e | 8

P a g e | 9

3. Result and Discussions

After performing the simulation we have found that the production of methanol (purity and production rate) depends on different parameters of the process. So by controlling these parameters optimum methanol production can be obtained. [11]

From the simulation result we have observed the effect of several parameters on production. Those effects are described in below-

3.1 Purity of methanol on Feed stage to distillation

The relation between composition of methanol in final product and feed stage to distillation can be easily realized from the table and plot given below-

Feed Stage Composition (%)1 87.23282 89.52233 91.11174 92.21855 92.96836 93.43767 93.6188 93.50389 92.9323

10 90.3068

From the table and plot, it is observed that purity of methanol increases in higher feed stage from top and reaches at maximum and then again decreases. For this synthesis, optimum feed stage is 6th stage.

3.2 Conversion of CO and CO2 on reactor feed temperature

Conversion of both carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide both decrease with temperature increase. [10] But reaction rate will be low at low temperature. Considering these two opposite aspects, the reaction is done in 200oC. These phenomena can be easily observed from the table and the plot given below-

Figure03: Composition of methanol in product versus feed stage of distillation.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1184

86

88

90

92

94

96

Feed Stage

Com

positi

on(%

)

Table 03:Variation of purity of methanol with feed stage.

P a g e | 10

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Conversion COConversion CO2

Reactor feed temperature (ºC)

Conv

ersio

n(%

)

3.3 Purity of distilled methanol on fraction of recycle

Purity of methanol increases with increase in fraction of recycle. But there may be inert in the feed and to control the buildup of inert in the product, some reactor outlet has to be purged after separation and before recycle.

Table 05: Variation of purity of methanol with fraction of recycle.

Figure04: Conversion versus reactor feed

Table 04: Variation of conversion of CO and CO2

with reactor feed temperature.

Reactor feed pressure(atm)

Conversion of CO (%)

Conversion of CO2 (%)

10 0.1802 3.306

15 2.997 6.997

20 5.052 9.505

25 6.51 11.54

30 7.662 13.27

35 8.624 14.8

40 9.245 15.95

45 9.245 15.95

P a g e | 11

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 191

91.5

92

92.5

93

93.5

94

Fraction of Recycle

Com

positi

on o

f Met

hano

l (%

)

3.4 Conversion of CO &CO2 on Feed pressure

Conversion of both CO and CO2 increases with feed pressure i.e. reactor pressure. But considering the safety purpose and operational cost, optimum pressure is chosen at 39.48 atm.

Figure 05: Composition of methanol in product versus fraction of recycle.

Table 06:Variation of conversion of CO and CO2 with reactor pressure.

Reactor feed pressure(atm)

Conversion of CO (%)

Conversion of CO2 (%)

10 0.1802 3.306

15 2.997 6.997

20 5.052 9.505

25 6.51 11.54

30 7.662 13.27

35 8.624 14.8

40 9.245 15.95

45 9.245 15.95

P a g e | 12

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5002468

1012141618

Conversiom of CO

Conversion of CO2

Pressure (atm)

Conv

ersio

n(%

)

3.5 Purity of methanol on separator feed temperature

Distilled methanol purity increases with increase in separator feed temperature. But after a certain temperature, it becomes constant.

Figure 06: Conversion of CO and CO2 versus reactor pressure

Table 07: Variation of composition of distilled methanol with separator temperature.

Reactor feed pressure(atm)

Conversion of CO (%)

Conversion of CO2 (%)

10 0.1802 3.306

15 2.997 6.997

20 5.052 9.505

25 6.51 11.54

30 7.662 13.27

35 8.624 14.8

40 9.245 15.95

45 9.245 15.95

P a g e | 13

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10090

90.591

91.592

92.593

93.594

Separator temperature (°C)

Com

positi

on(%

)

Figure 07: Composition of distilled methanol versus separator feed temperature.

Separator Temperature (°C)

Comp of distilled methanol (%)

10 91.33820 92.107230 92.410540 92.83450 93.193560 93.436970 93.59280 93.619285 93.635186 93.6634

P a g e | 14

3.6 Methanol production rate on reactor feed temperature

Methanol production rate decrease with increase in reactor feed temperature.

Temperature,(°C) Production flow rate, (kgmole/hr)

25 222.750 217

100 204.6150 186200 161250 125.2300 75.89350 30.06400 5.32430 0.6258

3.7 Methanol production rate on Feed pressure

Methanol production rateincreases with feed pressure i.e. reactor pressure. But considering the safety purpose and operational cost, optimum pressure is chosen at 39.48 atm.

Table 08: Variation of methanol production with reactor feed temperature.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

255075

100125150175200225250

Methanol production rate vs. reactor feed tempera-

ture

Reactor feed temperature(ºC)

Met

hano

l pro

ducti

on ra

te(k

mol

e/hr

)

Figure 08: Methanol production rate versus reactor feed temperature.

Table 09: Methanol production rate with reactor pressure.

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450

50

100

150

200

250

Production Rate vs. Feed Pressure

Feed Pressure (atm)

Prod

uctio

n Ra

te (K

mol

e/Hr

)

Figure 09: Methanol production rate versus feed pressure.

Pressure of Feed (atm) Production Rate (kmole/hr)

10 65.1615 142.920 174.225 191.130 203.435 211.336 212.937 216.238 213.739 216.640 217.1

P a g e | 15

4. Conclusion

Methanol synthesis is an important chemical process. In our paper, we have generated data based

on the simulation performed in HYSYS. This data can help us understand the process in different

situation in industrial practice. By varying the different parameters in this simulation

environment, the effects of these parameters on methanol production are observed and the results

are shown in graphical and tabular form. Using the plots, the optimum conditions for methanol

production can be easily found out.

P a g e | 16

References

1. Kurtz M., Wilmer H., Genger T., Hinrichsen O. and Muhler M. (2003) Deactivation of

supported copper catalysts for methanol synthesis.

Catalysis Letters, vol. 86, p. 77-80.

2. Lange J.-P. (2001) Methanol synthesis: a short review of technology improvements.

Catalysis Today, vol. 64, p. 3-8.

3. Lovik I. (2001) Modelling, estimation and optimization of the methanol synthesis with catalyst

deactivation. Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 127p.

4. Yang R., Yu X., Zhang Y., Li W. and Tsubaki N. (2008) A new method of low temperature

methanol synthesis on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts from CO/CO2/H2. Fuel, vol. 87, p.443-450.

5. Klier K. (1982). Methanol synthesis. Advances in Catalysis, vol. 31, p. 243-313

6. Skrzypek J., Lachowska M., Grzesik M., Słoczyński J. and Novak P. (1995) Thermodynamics

and kinetics of low pressure methanol synthesis. The Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 58, p.

101-108.

7. VandenBussche K.M. and Froment G.F. (1996) A steady-state kinetic model for methanol

synthesis and the water gas shift reaction on a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst. Journal of

Catalysis, vol. 161, p. 1-10.

8. Tijm P.J.A.,Waller F.J. and Browne D.M. (2001) Methanol technology developments for the

new millennium.Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 221, p. 275–282.

9. Gallucci F. and Basile A. (2007) A theoretical analysis of methanol synthesis from CO2 and

H2 in a ceramic membrane reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, p. 5050-

5058.

10. Graaf G.H. and Beenackers A.A.C.M. (1996) Comparison of two-phase and three-phase

methanol synthesis processes. Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 35, p. 413-427.

11. Felder R.M. And R.W. Rousseau (1939) Elementary principles of chemical processess, 3rd

edition,p. 592-595.