Simpson Terseset

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Simpson Terseset

    1/4

    gypt xploration Society

    Two Lexical Notes to the Reisner Papyri: wrt and trsstAuthor(s): William Kelly SimpsonSource: The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. 59 (Aug., 1973), pp. 220-222Published by: Egypt Exploration SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3856118.

    Accessed: 18/03/2014 17:14

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Egypt Exploration Societyis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal

    of Egyptian Archaeology.

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=eeshttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3856118?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3856118?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ees
  • 8/10/2019 Simpson Terseset

    2/4

    BRIEF

    COMMUNICATIONS

    the

    one

    grinding

    orn

    and the other

    tirring

    fire;

    the second

    figure

    holds

    her

    left

    hand

    rather

    similarly,

    nd Borchardt

    p.

    158

    n.

    2)

    ascribes

    like

    purpose

    to

    the

    posture-'um

    sich

    gegen

    die

    Glut

    zu

    schiitzen'.

    KATE

    BOSSE-GRIFFITHS

    Two lexical notesto the Reisner

    Papyri: whrt

    nd

    trsst

    I. IN

    Papyrus

    eisner,

    D

    29,

    heading

    or list f

    workmeneads

    nttm

    whrt,

    thosewho

    re

    n

    (or

    from)

    he

    dockyard-workshop'.I

    his

    nstitution

    lays major

    ole n P.

    Reisner I but s not

    otherwise

    ttested

    nP.

    Reisner

    and II.

    In

    the

    ommentary

    n

    P. Reisner

    the erm

    s

    erroneously

    read

    krt,

    ince

    the

    sign

    n

    question

    eemed to be

    Sign

    List N

    29,

    the

    sandy

    hill-slope;

    he termkrt

    was

    consequently

    iscussed.2

    t is now evident ome that he nitial

    ign

    s the

    similar ake

    sign

    of

    Sign

    List

    X

    7,

    which

    s

    bestknown romtsuse

    n

    writings

    f

    wnm,

    to eat'.

    n

    brief,

    rt s

    to be

    eliminatedrom hediscussion

    nd ndex fP. Reisner

    and

    the

    erm

    roperlyecognized

    s whrt.

    The

    sign

    f

    the

    ake,

    ign

    List

    X

    7,

    is not

    otherwise

    epresented,

    o the

    best f

    my

    knowledge,

    n

    early

    hieratic:

    t

    does not

    occur n the

    palaeographic

    ables of Moller's Hieratische

    aldographie,

    ,

    The Hekanakhte

    apers,

    nd

    theAbu Sir

    papyri.

    he instance fP. Reisner

    ,

    D

    29,

    may

    be the

    only

    example

    oted o date. For

    similar

    writings

    f whrt

    n

    hieroglyphic

    ne has

    only

    o consult

    he

    admirable istmadebyFischer,3 he

    reading

    f which

    prompted

    me to

    dispose

    of thespuriouskrt.

    As

    is well

    known,

    hieratic

    as a

    generalpreference

    orfuller

    writings,

    s

    exemplified y

    the normal

    writings

    fwhrt

    n

    P. Reisner

    I.

    II.

    In

    Papyrus

    Reisner

    a term

    n

    the

    accounts

    s

    rendered s

    trsst,

    bread

    unit or

    compensation

    unit'.4

    ts

    importance

    s indicated

    y

    the remark:One

    gains

    the distinct

    mpression

    hat he

    ultimate

    urpose

    of the

    document

    s a whole

    is

    the

    computation

    f

    the number

    of

    man-days

    x-

    pended

    n a work

    roject

    n order o determine

    he ost f he abor

    n termsf erseset

    nits.'s

    he

    only

    other

    nstance

    f the term

    hat

    could

    find s the ocus of

    Hekanakhte

    apers

    V,

    Ro.

    30-3,

    in

    which

    1,000

    WFsrt-loaves,

    00

    bhsw-loaves,

    nd

    3,700

    trsst-loavesre added

    to

    obtain total

    of

    6,000

    trsst-loaves

    r

    units,

    perhaps

    mplying,

    s

    James

    uggests,

    n

    unexpressed quivalence

    of

    5

    Shrt-

    loavesto 4 trsst-loavesnd i bhsw-loafo 3 trsst-loaves.6 curious et of trsst ocumentshas now

    come

    to

    my

    ttention

    n the

    nscriptions

    n wooden

    objects,

    ircular

    isks,

    egs,

    ones,

    nd a diamond

    shaped

    bject,

    rom

    he

    debris fRoom

    F

    5

    at the ort fUronarti.7

    osthave

    been

    plastered

    ith

    a

    light

    oating

    nd have

    piercings,

    single

    ole,

    nd/or

    hree maller

    oles,

    or hinwooden

    ails

    to attach

    hem.

    One

    bears

    the

    date

    of Year

    33

    of Ammenemes

    II,

    without

    month r

    day,

    nd

    hence

    the

    bjects

    re

    ecurely

    ated

    n theTwelfth

    ynasty.

    hey

    were ound ith ixhard-stone

    eights

    inscribed

    ith

    nits

    f

    gold.

    W.

    K.

    Simpson,

    Papyrus

    Reisner

    ,

    pl.

    7, 7A.

    2

    Ibid.

    33,

    I35,

    pl.

    7A.

    3

    Henry

    G.

    Fischer,

    Dendera n

    the

    Third

    Millennium

    .C.,

    211-I2.

    4

    Papyrus

    Reisner

    , 35

    and

    passim.

    5

    Ibid.

    35.

    6

    T. G.

    H.

    James,

    The

    Hekanakhte

    apers,

    6o-I.

    7

    D.

    Dunham,

    Uronarti, halfak,

    Mirgissa

    Second

    Cataract

    Forts,

    Iu.

    34-5,

    pls. 27-8.

    I have

    attempted

    nthe

    accompanying

    igure

    transcription

    fthetexts

    f these

    objects.

    For those

    n the Museum of Fine Arts

    have

    had

    access

    to

    the

    originals

    s well

    as

    N. F. Wheeler's

    opies

    madeatthetimeof

    their

    iscovery.

    or the

    objects

    in Khartoum

    have

    had to

    rely

    n the

    photographs

    nd Wheeler's

    opies.

    The

    writing

    s

    generally

    lear

    except

    when

    damage

    has

    occurred,

    yet

    the

    texts

    are not

    easy.

    The letters

    n

    the

    accompanying

    igure

    efer

    o

    the

    objects

    as follows:

    A)

    24-5-8;

    MFA

    24.732; S(econd)

    C(ataract) F(orts) 11, 4, 37, pl.

    27, I/2; (B)

    24-5-I8;

    MFA

    24.747;

    SCF

    ii,

    35,

    37,

    pl. 28,

    3;

    (c)

    24-5-10; Khartoum;

    SCF

    II,

    35, 37, pl. 27,

    I/3;

    (D)

    24-5-Ii;

    Khartoum;

    SCF

    II, 35,

    37, pl.

    27,

    i/I;

    (E) 24-5-I6;

    MFA

    24.754;

    SCF

    n1, 5, 37, pl. 27,

    2/I;

    (F)

    24-5-14;

    [continued

    n

    p.

    222]

    220

    This content downloaded from 193.205.136.30 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:14:57 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Simpson Terseset

    3/4

    nr

    lnnn

    }

    nnnnnnn

    nnnnn

    B

    nnnnnn

    i

    l1tl

    Bn,

    6sI

    *&Ate*r:

    = B^

    &

    ,-

    1

    a

    I-

    a ~ a-

    c

    nnnn

    1

    I l

    nnnn^.*^^^^^

    t 1

    S7r3

    n

    nn

    ;

    111

    n

    I

    '

    K

    l

    I_

    lfl

    rqrj'^

    p

    =

    0/^Lnnnn'n

    E

    Mo

    FIG.

    I.

    H

    'I

    ;a

    nnnn

    iiionnI

    F

    p.

    &

    a

    nnn

    nnn

    I

    I

    .

    6I

    .a 5

    v

    nnn

    .a.

    n

    n\v\

    This content downloaded from 193.205.136.30 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:14:57 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Simpson Terseset

    4/4

    BRIEF

    COMMUNICATIONS

    The

    function

    f

    these

    objects

    s notclear to

    me,

    although

    oth

    shape

    and

    the texts hould

    prove

    sufficientor

    closer

    dentification

    ftheir se. Since

    all have holes for

    wooden

    pegs

    or nails

    in

    part

    preserved),

    t

    must

    be

    assumed that

    hey

    wereattached

    o

    something

    lse.

    The use of the term

    h3

    furtherdentifies

    hem

    s

    a sortof record' or

    memorandum'.

    he

    ink-signs

    n the front nd

    back

    of

    one

    of them

    dd

    and

    nfr) uggest

    hat the material

    o

    which

    they

    referwas later

    examined

    nd

    found n

    sound

    condition. romthetexts

    seefigure)

    t

    s clear

    hat

    hey

    efer

    o baked

    units f

    bread,

    perhaps

    n

    the

    shape

    of

    the

    objects

    themselves,

    nd that hese

    units

    or oaves

    were

    made from

    ixed

    quantities

    f

    barley

    nd

    wheat

    ssigned

    o or

    provided

    by

    the

    work

    force

    msr).

    n

    'B'

    sixty

    nits

    re

    baked from

    /3heqat

    of

    northern

    arley,

    n

    'C'

    seventy

    nits

    from

    heqat

    of

    wheat.

    The

    writings

    with

    hefire-drill

    urther

    uggest

    hat t s

    usedfor

    he erm

    sw

    with

    he ense f

    baking

    nd

    not

    as

    a

    determinativeor

    rsst

    see

    'C').

    I

    have

    considered everal

    nterpretations

    or

    these

    objects

    but feel

    unconvinced

    by

    any

    of

    the

    alternatives,

    r

    combinations

    f

    them: that

    hey

    re in

    the

    nature

    f

    receipts

    orbaked

    goods

    taken

    from

    he

    bakery,

    hat

    hey

    were

    presented

    o the

    bakery

    s authorization

    or he

    expenditure

    f

    grain

    and the

    baking

    of

    bread,

    that

    they

    merely

    ommemorated

    transaction

    r

    act of

    baking,

    or

    that

    they

    erved as models forthe

    shape

    of

    the

    loaves to

    be delivered.

    These factors ould have been

    simply

    ransmitted

    rally

    r

    by

    hieratic

    messages.

    The

    certain

    actors

    re

    their

    se

    as

    a

    memorandum

    (sh3)and their ttachments a docket o partof a container uchas a storage in,although heydo

    not

    seem to

    be

    ideal for

    overs

    r

    plugs.

    t is

    curious

    hat ne ofthem

    hould

    be so

    formally

    ated n

    terms

    f a

    regnal

    year

    nd

    yet

    ack

    an

    indication

    f month nd

    day.

    The

    horizontal

    ign

    with

    loop

    above

    it n

    E'

    and G'

    looks

    ikethe coverof a bin

    or a

    levelling

    tick

    o smooth

    he

    heaps

    of

    grain.'

    The

    term

    ndm(

    )

    n

    B', 'E',

    and G'

    may

    ignify

    he

    object

    tself

    r

    the wood fromwhich t smade.

    Similarly,

    he first

    word

    n

    G'

    may

    be

    a

    termfor

    he

    object

    tself.

    n

    'F'

    and

    I',

    I

    am not

    certain

    whether o read

    the

    verbal

    phrase

    shiwn-twollowed

    by

    mm r to

    postulate

    n unattested twmm

    r

    *wtmm

    s a termfor

    oven

    or

    for

    bakingoperation.

    I

    draw

    attention o these

    puzzling

    objects

    and

    their exts

    n

    the

    hope

    that

    parallelsmay

    come to

    light

    to

    provide

    a

    better

    xplanation.

    ince the

    daily

    allowance

    of

    trsst nits s known from

    he

    Reisner

    papyri

    o be about

    eight

    per day,2

    nd

    since the

    amount

    of

    grain

    used

    in

    baking

    hem

    s

    provided

    now

    in

    these

    texts,

    t s

    possible

    that

    hese documents an

    be used

    to

    determine he

    daily

    caloric allowance for labourer n theTwelfth

    Dynasty.

    The dockets an be taken o represent

    ten-day

    llowancefor

    single

    worker,

    /3heqat

    of

    northern

    arley

    n B'

    and i

    heqat

    of

    wheat n

    'C'.

    These

    Uronarti

    dockets',

    f

    such

    they

    re,

    may

    add

    significantly

    o

    the solutionof the trsst

    problem

    f

    the

    examples

    n

    Khartoumcan be collated and

    the

    group

    submitted

    o

    further

    tudy.

    WILLIAM KELLY SIMPSON

    A

    consideration

    f

    Papyrus

    Kahun

    13

    OF

    the domestic

    ocuments

    f

    the Middle

    Kingdom

    discovered

    t

    Kahun,

    Papyrus

    Kahun

    13

    is the

    mostcomplex.Petrie,Kahun,pl. 13: convenientranscriptionySethe, nhisLesestiicke,I.) The

    MFA

    24.

    748;

    SCFII,

    35,

    37,

    pl.

    28,

    4

    upper;

    (G)

    24-5-17;

    Khartoum;

    SCFII, 35, 37, pI. 28,

    I; (H) 24-5-15;

    Khartoum;

    SCF

    11,

    35,

    37,

    pl.

    28,

    2;

    (i)

    24-5-13;

    Khartoum;

    SCF

    II, 35, 37,

    pl. 27, 2/3. Although

    these

    copies

    cannot

    be

    called

    definitive,

    specially

    n

    respect

    o

    the

    objects

    n

    Khartoum,

    he

    readings dopted

    should

    be

    given preference

    ver

    those n

    SCF

    II,

    34-5.

    1

    See,

    for

    xample,

    he

    objects

    represented

    n

    the

    frieze f

    objects

    n

    the

    tombof

    Hesy-Re':

    Vandier,

    Manuel

    d'archdologie,,

    part2, 716,

    fig.

    743.

    2

    Papyrus

    Reisner

    , 44-5.

    222

    This content downloaded from 193.205.136.30 on Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:14:57 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp