9
Factors encouraging smuggling Criminal organisation Sophisticated distribution No control over movement No duty during transit Illegal sales tolerated Difficulty telling legal from illegal Active support of tobacco companies

Simpson Smuggling

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Simpson Smuggling

Factors encouraging smuggling

• Criminal organisation

• Sophisticated distribution

• No control over movement

• No duty during transit

• Illegal sales tolerated

• Difficulty telling legal from illegal• Active support of tobacco companies

Page 2: Simpson Smuggling

Factors reducing smuggling

• Prominent tax stamps• Severe penalties• All in chain licensed• Tracking by serial number• Dispatch only to responsible destination• Label with destination• Increased anti-smuggling action• Action against companies

Page 3: Simpson Smuggling

Legal action against tobacco companies for alleged smuggling

• Oct. 2001: UK Dept of Trade investigates BAT

• Jan. ’02 Canada: Rothmans offices searched re smuggling to US, 1989-96

• Late ’01-early ’02: European Commission sues US companies for smuggling

• Feb. ’02(?): European Union accuses US companies of violating Iraq sanctions

• Early-mid ’02: US government sues PM for ‘racketeering’

• Oct. ’02: EU Commission sues Rothmans in USA for money laundering

• Jan. ’03: German boss of Reemtsma (Imperial) held by police

• Jan. ’03: Iraqi sues RJT over loss of (smuggling) earnings!• Mar. ’03: 8 JT (RJR) executives charged with C$1.2 Bn tax fraud from

smuggling 1991-96

Page 4: Simpson Smuggling

Hanoi,Vietnam2003

Page 5: Simpson Smuggling

Hanoi, Vietnam 2003

Page 6: Simpson Smuggling
Page 7: Simpson Smuggling

Vietnam, 2003

Page 8: Simpson Smuggling

Some notes from BAT

“Smuggled sales into Vietnam are currently estimated at approximately 7 bn [billion] p.a. although prior to a crackdown in 1990 (when [it was eliminated for 18 months) it was in the region of 12-17 bn p.a.”

“SE [State Express] 555 is the major smuggled brand and there is no doubt it has a tremendous image and sales potential in the country.”

“BAT has resisted agreeing to manufacture 555 in Vietnam due both to concerns about the ability to sell the brand as a locally manufactured product and to the possible impact of a licence outside Vietnam.

“…Vinataba [the Vietnamese State monopoly] sees a licence of 555 as an attractive opportunity for the JV [joint venture], and believes that BAT’s opposition to a licence is simply to ‘protect the smuggling’ trade.”3

From a BAT internal document (12 May 1995):

“In Vietnam, smoking State Express 555 means that you’ve made it.”

Comment by Fred Combe, general manager of BAT, Vietnam, 1998:

Page 9: Simpson Smuggling

Vietnam, 2003