Simple Nature

Simple NatureAn Introduction to Physics for Engineeringand Physical Science StudentsBenjamin Crowellwww.lightandmatter.com

Fullerton, Californiawww.lightandmatter.com

Copyright c2001-2005 Benjamin CrowellAll rights reserved.

rev. 13th October 2006

ISBN 0-9704670-7-9

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this docu-ment under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License, which can be found at creativecommons.org. Thelicense applies to the entire text of this book, plus all the illustra-tions that are by Benjamin Crowell. (At your option, you may alsocopy this book under the GNU Free Documentation License ver-sion 1.2, with no invariant sections, no front-cover texts, and noback-cover texts.) All the illustrations are by Benjamin Crowell ex-cept as noted in the photo credits or in parentheses in the captionof the figure. This book can be downloaded free of charge fromwww.lightandmatter.com in a variety of formats, including editableformats.

Brief Contents1 Conservation of Mass 132 Conservation of Energy 333 Conservation of Momentum 894 Conservation of Angular Momentum 1795 Thermodynamics 2336 Waves 2697 Relativity 3118 Atoms and Electromagnetism 3519 DC Circuits 409

10 Fields 45311 Electromagnetism 54312 Quantum Physics 617

5

Contents

1 Conservation of Mass1.1 Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Problem-solving techniques, 16.Delta notation, 18.1.2 Equivalence of Gravitational and Inertial Mass . . . . . 191.3 Galilean Relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Applications of calculus, 27.1.4 A Preview of Some Modern Physics . . . . . . . . . 28Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

2 Conservation of Energy2.1 Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

The energy concept, 33.Logical issues, 36.Kinetic energy, 37.Power, 41.Gravitational energy, 42.Equilibrium and stability,48.Predicting the direction of motion, 50.

2.2 Numerical Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 522.3 Gravitational Phenomena. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Keplers laws, 57.Circular orbits, 60.The suns gravitationalfield, 61.Gravitational energy in general, 61.The shell theorem,65.

2.4 Atomic Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70Heat is kinetic energy., 70.All energy comes from particles mov-ing or interacting., 72.

2.5 Oscillations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

3 Conservation of Momentum3.1 Momentum in One Dimension . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

Mechanical momentum, 89.Nonmechanical momentum, 93.Momentumcompared to kinetic energy, 94.Collisions in one dimension, 96.The center of mass, 101.The center of mass frame of reference,104.

3.2 Force in One Dimension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106Momentum transfer, 106.Newtons laws, 108.Forces betweensolids, 111.Work, 113.Simple machines, 119.Force related tointeraction energy, 120.

3.3 Resonance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Damped, free motion, 124.The quality factor, 127.Driven motion,128.

3.4 Motion in Three Dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . 135The Cartesian perspective, 135.Rotational invariance, 139.Vectors,140.Calculus with vectors, 154.The dot product, 158.Gradients

and line integrals (optional), 161.Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

4 Conservation of Angular Momentum4.1 Angular Momentum in Two Dimensions . . . . . . . . 179

Angular momentum, 179.Application to planetary motion, 185.Two Theorems About Angular Momentum, 187.Torque, 190.Applications to statics, 197.Proof of Keplers elliptical orbit law,201.

4.2 Rigid-Body Rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203Kinematics, 203.Relations between angular quantities and mo-tion of a point, 205.Dynamics, 207.Iterated integrals, 210.Finding moments of inertia by integration, 213.

4.3 Angular Momentum in Three Dimensions . . . . . . . 216Rigid-body kinematics in three dimensions, 216.Angular mo-mentum in three dimensions, 218.Rigid-body dynamics in threedimensions, 223.

Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232

5 Thermodynamics5.1 Pressure and Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234

Pressure, 235.Temperature, 238.5.2 Microscopic Description of an Ideal Gas . . . . . . . 242

Evidence for the kinetic theory, 242.Pressure, volume, and temperature,243.

5.3 Entropy as a Macroscopic Quantity. . . . . . . . . . 245Efficiency and grades of energy, 245.Heat engines, 246.Entropy,248.

5.4 Entropy as a Microscopic Quantity (Optional) . . . . . 252Amicroscopic view of entropy, 252.Phase space, 253.Microscopicdefinitions of entropy and temperature, 254.The arrow of time,or This way to the Big Bang, 257.Quantum mechanics andzero entropy, 258.Summary of the laws of thermodynamics, 259.

5.5 More about Heat Engines (Optional) . . . . . . . . . 260Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266

6 Waves6.1 Free Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270

Wave motion, 270.Waves on a string, 276.Sound and lightwaves, 280.Periodic waves, 282.The Doppler effect, 286.

6.2 Bounded Waves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291Reflection, transmission, and absorption, 291.Quantitative treat-ment of reflection, 296.Interference effects, 299.Waves boundedon both sides, 302.

Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307

8 Contents

7 Relativity7.1 Basic Relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312

The principle of relativity, 312.Distortion of time and space,313.Applications, 316.

7.2 The Lorentz transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321Coordinate transformations in general, 321.Derivation of theLorentz transformation, 322.Spacetime, 327.

7.3 Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334Invariants, 334.Combination of velocities, 334.Momentum andforce, 336.Kinetic energy, 337.Equivalence of mass and energy,339.


8 Atoms and Electromagnetism8.1 The Electric Glue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351

The quest for the atomic force, 352.Charge, electricity and magnetism,354.Atoms, 359.Quantization of charge, 365.The electron,368.The raisin cookie model of the atom, 373.

8.2 The Nucleus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375Radioactivity, 375.The planetary model of the atom, 379.Atomic number, 383.The structure of nuclei, 388.The strongnuclear force, alpha decay and fission, 391.The weak nuclearforce; beta decay, 393.Fusion, 397.Nuclear energy and bindingenergies, 398.Biological effects of ionizing radiation, 401.Thecreation of the elements, 403.

Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405

9 DC Circuits9.1 Current and Voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410

Current, 410.Circuits, 414.Voltage, 415.Resistance, 420.Current-conducting properties of materials, 428.

9.2 Parallel and Series Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432Schematics, 432.Parallel resistances and the junction rule, 433.Series resistances, 438.


10 Fields10.1 Fields of Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453

Why fields?, 454.The gravitational field, 456.The electric field,459.

10.2 Voltage Related to Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464One dimension, 464.Two or three dimensions, 466.

10.3 Fields by Superposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468Electric field of a continuous charge distribution, 468.The fieldnear a charged surface, 473.

Contents 9

10.4 Energy in Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476Electric field energy, 476.Gravitational field energy, 481.Magneticfield energy, 481.

10.5 LRC Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482Capacitance and inductance, 482.Oscillations, 486.Voltage andcurrent, 488.Decay, 493.Impedance, 496.Power, 499.ImpedanceMatching, 502.Review of Complex Numbers, 504.Complex Impedance,507.

10.6 Fields by Gauss Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 510Gauss law, 510.Additivity of flux, 514.Zero flux from outsidecharges, 514.Proof of Gauss theorem, 518.Gauss law as afundamental law of physics, 519.Applications, 520.

10.7 Gauss Law in Differential Form. . . . . . . . . . . 522Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537

11 Electromagnetism11.1 More About the Magnetic Field . . . . . . . . . . . 543

Magnetic forces, 543.The magnetic field, 547.Some applications,552.No magnetic monopoles, 554.Symmetry and handedness,556.

11.2 Magnetic Fields by Superposition . . . . . . . . . . 558Superposition of straight wires, 558.Energy in the magnetic field,561.Superposition of dipoles, 562.The Biot-Savart law (optional),566.

11.3 Magnetic Fields by Ampe`res Law. . . . . . . . . . 570Ampe`res law, 570.A quick and dirty proof, 572.Maxwellsequations for static fields, 573.

11.4 Ampe`res Law in Differential Form (optional) . . . . . 575The curl operator, 575.Properties of the curl operator, 576.

11.5 Induced Electric Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 580Faradays experiment, 580.Why induction?, 584.Faradays law,587.

11.6 Maxwells Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 591Induced magnetic fields, 591.Light waves, 594.

Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603

12 Quantum Physics12.1 Rules of Randomness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617

Randomness isnt random., 619.Calculating randomness, 620.Probability distributions, 624.Exponential decay and half-life,627.Applications of calculus, 632.

12.2 Light as a Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 634Evidence for light as a particle, 635.Howmuch light is one photon?,637.Wave-particle duality, 642.Photons in three dimensions,646.

12.3 Matter as a Wave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 648Electrons as waves, 649.Dispersive waves, 653.Bound states,657.The uncertainty principle and measurement, 660.Electrons

10 Contents

in electric fields, 665.The Schrodinger equation, 666.12.4 The Atom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670

Classifying states, 671.Angular momentum in three dimensions,672.The hydrogen atom, 674.Energies of states in hydrogen,677.Electron spin, 679.Atoms with more than one electron,682.


Appendix 1: Programming with Python 694Appendix 2: Miscellany 696Appendix 3: Photo Credits 703Appendix 4: Hints and Solutions 705Appendix 5: Useful Data 719

Notation and terminology, compared with other books, 719.Notation and units, 720.Metric prefixes, 720.Nonmetric units,721.The Greek alphabet, 721.Fundamental constants, 721.Subatomic particles, 721.Earth, moon, and sun, 722.The pe-riodic table, 722.Atomic masses, 722.

Appendix 6: Summary 723

Contents 11

12 Contents

Chapter 1Conservation of MassIt took just a moment for that head to fall, but a hundred yearsmight not produce another like it.

Joseph-Louis Lagrange, referring to the execution of Lavoisieron May 8, 1794

The Republic has no need of scientists.

Judge Pierre-Andre Coffinhals reply to Lavoisiers request fora fifteen-day delay of his execution, so that he could completesome experiments that might be of value to the Republic. Cof-finhal was himself executed August 6, 1794. As a scientificexperiment, Lavoisier decided to try to determine how longhis consciousness would continue after he was guillotined, byblinking his eyes for as long as possible. He blinked twelvetimes after his head was chopped off.

1.1 MassChange is impossible, claimed the ancient Greek philosopher Par-menides. His work was nonscientific, since he didnt state his ideasin a form that would allow them to be tested experimentally, butmodern science nevertheless has a strong Parmenidean flavor. Hismain argument that change is an illusion was that something cantbe turned into nothing, and likewise if you have nothing, you cantturn it into something. To make this into a scientific theory, we haveto decide on a way to measure what something is, and we can thencheck by measurements whether the total amount of something inthe universe really stays constant. How much something is therein a rock? Does a sunbeam count as something? Does heat count?Motion? Thoughts and feelings?

If you look at the table of contents of this book, youll see thatthe first four chapters have the word conservation in them. Inphysics, a conservation law is a statement that the total amount ofa certain physical quantity always stays the same. This chapter isabout conservation of mass. The metric system is designed around aunit of distance, the meter, a unit of mass, the kilogram, and a timeunit, the second.1 Numerical measurement of distance and time

1If you havent already, you should now go ahead and memorize the commonmetric prefixes, which are summarized on page 720.

13

a / Portrait of Monsieur Lavoisierand His Wife, by Jacques-LouisDavid, 1788. Lavoisier inventedthe concept of conservation ofmass. The husband is depictedwith his scientific apparatus,while in the background on theleft is the portfolio belongingto Madame Lavoisier, who isthought to have been a student ofDavids.

probably date back almost as far into prehistory as counting money,but mass is a more modern concept. Until scientists figured out thatmass was conserved, it wasnt obvious that there could be a single,consistent way of measuring an amount of matter, hence jiggers ofwhiskey and cords of wood. You may wonder why conservation ofmass wasnt discovered until relatively modern times, but it wasntobvious, for example, that gases had mass, and that the apparentloss of mass when wood was burned was exactly matched by themass of the escaping gases.

Once scientists were on the track of the conservation of massconcept, they began looking for a way to define mass in terms of adefinite measuring procedure. If they tried such a procedure, and theresult was that it led to nonconservation of mass, then they wouldthrow it out and try a different procedure. For instance, we mightbe tempted to define mass using kitchen measuring cups, i.e. as ameasure of volume. Mass would then be perfectly conserved for aprocess like mixing marbles with peanut butter, but there would beprocesses like freezing water that led to a net increase in mass, andothers like soaking up water with a sponge that caused a decrease.If, with the benefit of hindsight, it seems like the measuring cupdefinition was just plain silly, then heres a more subtle example ofa wrong definition of mass. Suppose we define it using a bathroomscale, or a more precise device such as a postal scale that works onthe same principle of using gravity to compress or twist a spring.The trouble is that gravity is not equally strong all over the surfaceof the earth, so for instance there would be nonconservation of masswhen you brought an object up to the top of a mountain, wheregravity is a little weaker.

There are, however, at least two approaches to defining massthat lead to its being a conserved quantity, so we consider thesedefinitions to be right in the pragmatic sense that whats correctis whats useful.

One definition that works is to use balances, but compensatefor the local strength of gravity. This is the method that is usedby scientists who actually specialize in ultraprecise measurements.A standard kilogram, in the form of a platinum-iridium cylinder,is kept in a special shrine in Paris. Copies are made that balanceagainst the standard kilogram in Parisian gravity, and they are thentransported to laboratories in other parts of the world, where theyare compared with other masses in the local gravity. The quantitydefined in this way is called gravitational mass.

A second and completely different approach is to measure howhard it is to change an objects state of motion. This tells us its in-ertial mass. For example, Id be more willing to stand in the way ofan oncoming poodle than in the path of a freight train, because mybody will have a harder time convincing the freight train to stop.

14 Chapter 1 Conservation of Mass

b / The time for one cycle ofvibration is related to the objectsinertial mass.

c / Astronaut Tamara Jerniganmeasures her inertial massaboard the Space Shuttle.

This is a dictionary-style conceptual definition, but in physics weneed to back up a conceptual definition with an operational defini-tion, which is one that spells out the operations required in orderto measure the quantity being defined. We can operationalize ourdefinition of inertial mass by throwing a standard kilogram at an ob-ject at a speed of 1 m/s (one meter per second) and measuring therecoiling objects velocity. Suppose we want to measure the massof a particular block of cement. We put the block in a toy wagonon the sidewalk, and throw a standard kilogram at it. Suppose thestandard kilogram hits the wagon, and then drops straight downto the sidewalk, having lost all its velocity, and the wagon and theblock inside recoil at a velocity of 0.23 m/s. We then repeat theexperiment with the block replaced by various numbers of standardkilograms, and find that we can reproduce the recoil velocity of 0.23m/s with four standard kilograms in the wagon. We have deter-mined the mass of the block to be four kilograms.2 Although thisdefinition of inertial mass has an appealing conceptual simplicity, itis obviously not very practical, at least in this crude form. Never-theless, this method of collision is very much like the methods usedfor measuring the masses of subatomic particles, which, after all,cant be put on little postal scales!

Astronauts spending long periods of time in space need to mon-itor their loss of bone and muscle mass, and here as well, its im-possible to measure gravitational mass. Since they dont want tohave standard kilograms thrown at them, they use a slightly differ-ent technique (figures b and c). They strap themselves to a chairwhich is attached to a large spring, and measure the time it takesfor one cycle of vibration.

2You might think intuitively that the recoil velocity should be exactly onefourth of a meter per second, and youd be right except that the wagon has somemass as well. Our present approach, however, only requires that we give a wayto test for equality of masses. To predict the recoil velocity from scratch, wedneed to use conservation of momentum, which is discussed in a later chapter.

Section 1.1 Mass 15

d / Example 1.

1.1.1 Problem-solving techniquesHow do we use a conservation law, such as conservation of mass,

to solve problems? There are two basic techniques.

As an analogy, consider conservation of money, which makes itillegal for you to create dollar bills using your own laser printer.(Most people dont intentionally destroy their dollar bills, either!)Suppose the police notice that a particular store doesnt seem tohave any customers, but the owner wears lots of gold jewelry anddrives a BMW. They suspect that the store is a front for some kindof crime, perhaps counterfeiting. With intensive surveillance, thereare two basic approaches they could use in their investigation. Onemethod would be to have undercover agents try to find out howmuch money goes in the door, and how much money comes backout at the end of the day, perhaps by arranging through some trickto get access to the owners briefcase in the morning and evening. Ifthe amount of money that comes out every day is greater than theamount that went in, and if theyre convinced there is no safe on thepremises holding a large reservoir of money, then the owner mustbe counterfeiting. This inflow-equals-outflow technique is useful ifwe are sure that there is a region of space within which there is nosupply of mass that is being built up or depleted.

A stream of water example 1If you watch water flowing out of the end of a hose, youll see that thestream of water is fatter near the mouth of the hose, and skinnier lowerdown. This is because the water speeds up as it falls. If the cross-sectional area of the stream was equal all along its length, then the rateof flow (kilograms per second) through a lower cross-section would begreater than the rate of flow through a cross-section higher up. Sincethe flow is steady, the amount of water between the two cross-sectionsstays constant. Conservation of mass therefore requires that the cross-sectional area of the stream shrink in inverse proportion to the increas-ing speed of the falling water.

Self-CheckSuppose the you point the hose straight up, so that the water is risingrather than falling. What happens as the velocity gets smaller? Whathappens when the velocity becomes zero? . Answer, p. 707

How can we apply a conservation law, such as conservation ofmass, in a situation where mass might be stored up somewhere? Touse a crime analogy again, a prison could contain a certain numberof prisoners, who are not allowed to flow in or out at will. In physics,this is known as a closed system. A guard might notice that a certainprisoners cell is empty, but that doesnt mean hes escaped. Hecould be sick in the infirmary, or hard at work in the shop earningcigarette money. What prisons actually do is to count all theirprisoners every day, and make sure todays total is the same asyesterdays. One way of stating a conservation law is that for aclosed system, the total amount of stuff (mass, in this chapter) stays


constant.

Lavoisier and chemical reactions in a closed system example 2The French chemist Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier is considered the inven-tor of the concept of conservation of mass. Before Lavoisier, chemistshad never systematically weighed their chemicals to quantify the amountof each substance that was undergoing reactions. They also didntcompletely understand that gases were just another state of matter,and hadnt tried performing reactions in sealed chambers to determinewhether gases were being consumed from or released into the air. Forthis they had at least one practical excuse, which is that if you perform agas-releasing reaction in a sealed chamber with no room for expansion,you get an explosion! Lavoisier invented a balance that was capable ofmeasuring milligram masses, and figured out how to do reactions in anupside-down bowl in a basin of water, so that the gases could expand bypushing out some of the water. In a crucial experiment, Lavoisier heateda red mercury compound, which we would now describe as mercury ox-ide (HgO), in such a sealed chamber. A gas was produced (Lavoisierlater named it oxygen), driving out some of the water, and the redcompound was transformed into silvery liquid mercury metal. The cru-cial point was that the total mass of the entire apparatus was exactlythe same before and after the reaction. Based on many observationsof this type, Lavoisier proposed a general law of nature, that mass is al-ways conserved. (In earlier experiments, in which closed systems werenot used, chemists had become convinced that there was a mysterioussubstance, phlogiston, involved in combustion and oxidation reactions,and that phlogistons mass could be positive, negative, or zero depend-ing on the situation!)

Section 1.1 Mass 17

1.1.2 Delta notationA convenient notation used throughout physics is , the up-

percase Greek letter delta, which indicates change in or afterminus before. For example, if b represents how much money youhave in the bank, then a deposit of $100 could be represented asb = $100. That is, the change in your balance was $100, or thebalance after the transaction minus the balance before the transac-tion equals $100. A withdrawal would be indicated by b < 0. Werepresent before and after using the subscripts i (initial) andf (final), e.g. b = bf bi. Often the delta notation allows moreprecision than English words. For instance, time can be used tomean a point in time (nows the time), t, or it could mean a periodof time (the whole time, he had spit on his chin), t.

This notation is particularly convenient for discussing conservedquantities. The law of conservation of mass can be stated simply asm = 0, where m is the total mass of any closed system.

Self-CheckIf x represents the location of an object moving in one dimension, thenhow would positive and negative signs of x be interpreted? . Answer,p. 708

Discussion QuestionsA If an object had a straight-line x t graph with x = 0 and t 6= 0,what would be true about its velocity? What would this look like on agraph? What about t = 0 and x 6= 0?


a / The two pendulum bobsare constructed with equal grav-itational masses. If their inertialmasses are also equal, then eachpendulum should take exactly thesame amount of time per swing.

b / If the cylinders have slightlyunequal ratios of inertial to grav-itational mass, their trajectorieswill be a little different.

c / A simplified drawing of anEotvos-style experiment. Ifthe two masses, made out oftwo different substances, haveslightly different ratios of inertialto gravitational mass, then theapparatus will twist slightly as theearth spins.

1.2 Equivalence of Gravitational and Inertial MassWe find experimentally that both gravitational and inertial massare conserved to a high degree of precision for a great number ofprocesses, including chemical reactions, melting, boiling, soaking upwater with a sponge, and rotting of meat and vegetables. Now itslogically possible that both gravitational and inertial mass are con-served, but that there is no particular relationship between them, inwhich case we would say that they are separately conserved. On theother hand, the two conservation laws may be redundant, like havingone law against murder and another law against killing people!

Heres an experiment that gets at the issue: stand up now anddrop a coin and one of your shoes side by side. I used a 400-gramshoe and a 2-gram penny, and they hit the floor at the same timeas far as I could tell by eye. This is an interesting result, but aphysicist and an ordinary person will find it interesting for differentreasons.

The layperson is surprised, since it would seem logical thatheaver objects would always fall faster than light ones. However,its fairly easy to prove that if air friction is negligible, any two ob-jects made of the same substance must have identical motion whenthey fall. For instance, a 2-kg copper mass must exhibit the samefalling motion as a 1-kg copper mass, because nothing would bechanged by physically joining together two 1-kg copper masses tomake a single 2-kg copper mass. Suppose, for example, that theyare joined with a dab of glue; the glue isnt under any strain, be-cause the two masses are doing the same thing side by side. Sincethe glue isnt really doing anything, it makes no difference whetherthe masses fall separately or side by side.3

What a physicist finds remarkable about the shoe-and-penny ex-periment is that it came out the way it did even though the shoeand the penny are made of different substances. There is abso-lutely no theoretical reason why this should be true. We could saythat it happens because the greater gravitational mass of the shoeis exactly counteracted by its greater inertial mass, which makes itharder for gravity to get it moving, but that just begs the questionof why inertial mass and gravitational mass are always in proportionto each other. Its possible that they are only approximately equiv-alent. Most of the mass of ordinary matter comes from neutronsand protons, and we could imagine, for instance, that neutrons andprotons do not have exactly the same ratio of gravitational to iner-tial mass. This would show up as a different ratio of gravitationalto inertial mass for substances containing different proportions ofneutrons and protons.

3The argument only fails for objects light enough to be affected appreciablyby air friction: a bunch of feathers falls differently if you wad them up becausethe pattern of air flow is altered by putting them together.

Section 1.2 Equivalence of Gravitational and Inertial Mass 19

d / A more realistic drawingof Braginskii and Panovs ex-periment. The whole thing wasencased in a tall vacuum tube,which was placed in a sealedbasement whose temperaturewas controlled to within 0.02 C.The total mass of the platinumand aluminum test masses,plus the tungsten wire and thebalance arms, was only 4.4 g.To detect tiny motions, a laserbeam was bounced off of a mirrorattached to the wire. There wasso little friction that the balancewould have taken on the order ofseveral years to calm down com-pletely after being put in place;to stop these vibrations, staticelectrical forces were appliedthrough the two circular plates toprovide very gentle twists on theellipsoidal mass between them.After Braginskii and Panov.

Galileo did the first numerical experiments on this issue in theseventeenth century by rolling balls down inclined planes, althoughhe didnt think about his results in these terms. A fairly easy way toimprove on Galileos accuracy is to use pendulums with bobs madeof different materials. Suppose, for example, that we construct analuminum bob and a brass bob, and use a double-pan balance toverify to good precision that their gravitational masses are equal. Ifwe then measure the time required for each pendulum to performa hundred cycles, we can check whether the results are the same.If their inertial masses are unequal, then the one with a smallerinertial mass will go through each cycle faster, since gravity hasan easier time accelerating and decelerating it. With this type ofexperiment, one can easily verify that gravitational and inertial massare proportional to each other to an accuracy of 103 or 104.

In 1889, the Hungarian physicist Roland Eotvos used a slightlydifferent approach to verify the equivalence of gravitational and in-ertial mass for various substances to an accuracy of about 108, andthe best such experiment, figure d, improved on even this phenome-nal accuracy, bringing it to the 1012 level.4 In all the experimentsdescribed so far, the two objects move along similar trajectories:straight lines in the penny-and-shoe and inclined plane experiments,and circular arcs in the pendulum version. The Eotvos-style exper-iment looks for differences in the objects trajectories. The conceptcan be understood by imagining the following simplified version.Suppose, as in figure b, we roll a brass cylinder off of a tabletopand measure where it hits the floor, and then do the same with analuminum cylinder, making sure that both of them go over the edgewith precisely the same velocity. An object with zero gravitationalmass would fly off straight and hit the wall, while an object withzero inertial mass would make a sudden 90-degree turn and dropstraight to the floor. If the aluminum and brass cylinders have or-dinary, but slightly unequal, ratios of gravitational to inertial mass,then they will follow trajectories that are just slightly different. Inother words, if inertial and gravitational mass are not exactly pro-portional to each other for all substances, then objects made ofdifferent substances will have different trajectories in the presenceof gravity.

A simplified drawing of a practical, high-precision experimentis shown in figure c. Two objects made of different substances arebalanced on the ends of a bar, which is suspended at the center froma thin fiber. The whole apparatus moves through space on a com-plicated, looping trajectory arising from the rotation of the earthsuperimposed on the earths orbital motion around the sun. Boththe earths gravity and the suns gravity act on the two objects. Iftheir inertial masses are not exactly in proportion to their gravi-tational masses, then they will follow slightly different trajectories

4V.B. Braginskii and V.I. Panov, Soviet Physics JETP 34, 463 (1972).


through space, which will result in a very slight twisting of the fiberbetween the daytime, when the suns gravity is pulling upward, andthe night, when the suns gravity is downward. Figure d shows amore realistic picture of the apparatus.

This type of experiment, in which one expects a null result, isa tough way to make a career as a scientist. If your measurementcomes out as expected, but with better accuracy than other peoplehad previously achieved, your result is publishable, but wont beconsidered earthshattering. On the other hand, if you build themost sensitive experiment ever, and the result comes out contraryto expectations, youre in a scary situation. You could be right, andearn a place in history, but if the result turns out to be due to adefect in your experiment, then youve made a fool of yourself.

Section 1.2 Equivalence of Gravitational and Inertial Mass 21

a / Portrait of Galileo Galilei,by Justus Sustermans, 1636.

1.3 Galilean RelativityI defined inertial mass conceptually as a measure of how hard it isto change an objects state of motion, the implication being that ifyou dont interfere, the objects motion wont change. Most people,however, believe that objects in motion have a natural tendency toslow down. Suppose I push my refrigerator to the west for a while at0.1 m/s, and then stop pushing. The average person would say fridgejust naturally stopped moving, but lets imagine how someone inChina would describe the fridge experiment carried out in my househere in California. Due to the rotation of the earth, California ismoving to the east at about 400 m/s. A point in China at the samelatitude has the same speed, but since China is on the other sideof the planet, Chinas east is my west. (If youre finding the three-dimensional visualization difficult, just think of China and Californiaas two freight trains that go past each other, each traveling at 400m/s.) If I insist on thinking of my dirt as being stationary, thenChina and its dirt are moving at 800 m/s to my west. From Chinaspoint of view, however, its California that is moving 800 m/s inthe opposite direction (my east). When Im pushing the fridge tothe west at 0.1 m/s, the observer in China describes its speed as799.9 m/s. Once I stop pushing, the fridge speeds back up to 800m/s. From my point of view, the fridge naturally slowed downwhen I stopped pushing, but according to the observer in China, itnaturally sped up!

Whats really happening here is that theres a tendency, dueto friction, for the fridge to stop moving relative to the floor. Ingeneral, only relative motion has physical significance in physics, notabsolute motion. Its not even possible to define absolute motion,since there is no special reference point in the universe that everyonecan agree is at rest. Of course if we want to measure motion, wedo have to pick some arbitrary reference point which we will sayis standing still, and we can then define x, y, and z coordinatesextending out from that point, which we can define as having x = 0,y = 0, z = 0. Setting up such a system is known as choosing aframe of reference. The local dirt is a natural frame of reference fordescribing a game of basketball, but if the game was taking place onthe deck of a moving ocean liner, we would probably pick a frame ofreference in which the deck was at rest, and the land was moving.

Galileo was the first scientist to reason along these lines, andwe now use the term Galilean relativity to refer to a somewhatmodernized version of his principle. Roughly speaking, the principleof Galilean relativity states that the same laws of physics apply inany frame of reference that is moving in a straight line at constantspeed. We need to refine this statement, however, since it is notnecessarily obvious which frames of reference are going in a straightline at constant speed. A person in a pickup truck pulling away froma stoplight could admit that the cars velocity is changing, or she


b / Left: In a frame of referencethat speeds up with the truck, thebowling ball appears to changeits state of motion for no reason.Right: In an inertial frame of ref-erence, which the surface of theearth approximately is, the bowl-ing ball stands still, which makessense because there is nothingthat would cause it to change itsstate of motion.

could insist that the truck is at rest, and the meter on the dashboardis going up because the asphalt picked that moment to start movingfaster and faster backward! Frames of reference are not all createdequal, however, and the accelerating trucks frame of reference is notas good as the asphalts. We can tell, because a bowling ball in theback of the truck appears to behave strangely in the drivers frameof reference: in her rear-view mirror, she sees the ball, initially atrest, start moving faster and faster toward the back of the truck.This goofy behavior is evidence that there is something wrong withher frame of reference. A person on the sidewalk, however, sees theball as standing still. In the sidewalks frame of reference, the truckpulls away from the ball, and this makes sense, because the truck isburning gas and using up energy to change its state of motion.

We therefore define an inertial frame of reference as one in whichwe never see objects change their state of motion without any appar-ent reason. The sidewalk is a pretty good inertial frame, and a carmoving relative to the sidewalk at constant speed in a straight linedefines a pretty good inertial frame, but a car that is acceleratingor turning is not a inertial frame.

The principle of Galilean relativity states that inertial framesexist, and that the same laws of physics apply in all inertial framesof reference, regardless of one frames straight-line, constant-speedmotion relative to another.5

Another way of putting it is that all inertial frames are createdequal. We can say whether one inertial frame is in motion or at rest

5The principle of Galilean relativity is extended on page 139.

Section 1.3 Galilean Relativity 23

c / Foucault demonstrates hispendulum to an audience at alecture in 1851.

relative to another, but there is no privileged rest frame. Thereis no experiment that comes out any different in laboratories indifferent inertial frames, so there is no experiment that could tell uswhich inertial frame is really, truly at rest.

The speed of sound example 3. The speed of sound in air is only 340 m/s, so unless you live at a near-polar latitude, youre moving at greater than the speed of sound rightnow due to the Earths rotation. In that case, why dont we experienceexciting phenomena like sonic booms all the time? . It might seem asthough youre unprepared to deal with this question right now, since theonly law of physics you know is conservation of mass, and conservationof mass doesnt tell you anything obviously useful about the speed ofsound or sonic booms. Galilean relativity, however, is a blanket state-ment about all the laws of physics, so in a situation like this, it may letyou predict the results of the laws of physics without actually knowingwhat all the laws are! If the laws of physics predict a certain value forthe speed of sound, then they had better predict the speed of the soundrelative to the air, not their speed relative to some special rest frame.Since the air is moving along with the rotation of the earth, we dontdetect any special phenomena. To get a sonic boom, the source of thesound would have to be moving relative to the air.

Self-CheckGalileo got in a bet with some rich noblemen about the following experi-ment. Suppose a ship is sailing across a calm harbor at constant speedin a straight line. A sailor is assigned to carry a rock up to the top ofone of the masts and then drop it to the deck. Does the rock land at thebase of the mast, or behind it due to the motion of the ship? (Galileowas never able to collect on his bet, because the noblemen didnt thinkan actual experiment was a valid way of deciding who was right.) .Answer, p. 708The Foucault pendulum example 4Note that in the example of the bowling ball in the truck, I didnt claimthe sidewalk was exactly a Galilean frame of reference. This is be-cause the sidewalk is moving in a circle due to the rotation of the Earth,and is therefore changing the direction of its motion continuously ona 24-hour cycle. However, the curve of the motion is so gentle thatunder ordinary conditions we dont notice that the local dirts frame ofreference isnt quite inertial. The first demonstration of the noninertialnature of the earth-fixed frame of reference was by Foucault using avery massive pendulum (figure c) whose oscillations would persist formany hours without becoming imperceptible. Although Foucault did hisdemonstration in Paris, its easier to imagine what would happen at thenorth pole: the pendulum would keep swinging in the same plane, butthe earth would spin underneath it once every 24 hours. To someonestanding in the snow, it would appear that the pendulums plane of mo-tion was twisting. The effect at latitudes less than 90 degrees turns outto be slower, but otherwise similar. The Foucault pendulum was the firstdefinitive experimental proof that the earth really did spin on its axis, al-though scientists had been convinced of its rotation for a century basedon more indirect evidence about the structure of the solar system.

Although popular belief has Galileo being prosecuted by the


Catholic Church for saying the earth rotated on its axis and also or-bited the sun, Foucaults pendulum was still centuries in the future,so Galileo had no hard proof; Galileos insights into relative versusabsolute motion simply made it more plausible that the world couldbe spinning without producing dramatic effects, but didnt disprovethe contrary hypothesis that the sun, moon, and stars went aroundthe earth every 24 hours. Furthermore, the Church was much moreliberal and enlightened than most people believe. It didnt (and stilldoesnt) require a literal interpretation of the Bible, and one of theChurch officials involved in the Galileo affair wrote that the Bibletells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go. In otherwords, religion and science should be separate. The actual reasonGalileo got in trouble is shrouded in mystery, since Italy in the age ofthe Medicis was a secretive place where unscrupulous people mightsettle a score with poison or a false accusation of heresy. What is cer-tain is that Galileos satirical style of scientific writing made manyenemies among the powerful Jesuit scholars who were his intellec-tual opponents he compared one to a snake that doesnt knowits own back is broken. Its also possible that the Church was farless upset by his astronomical work than by his support for atomism(discussed further in the next section). Some theologians perceivedatomism as contradicting transubstantiation, the Churchs doctrinethat the holy bread and wine were literally transformed into theflesh and blood of Christ by the priests blessing.


d / Discussion question C.

e / Discussion question D.

f / Discussion question E.

Discussion QuestionsB Aristotle stated that all objects naturally wanted to come to rest, withthe unspoken implication that rest would be interpreted relative to thesurface of the earth. Suppose we could transport Aristotle to the moon,put him in a space suit, and kick him out the door of the spaceship and intothe lunar landscape. What would he expect his fate to be in this situation?If intelligent creatures inhabited the moon, and one of them independentlycame up with the equivalent of Aristotelian physics, what would they thinkabout objects coming to rest?C A passenger on a cruise ship finds, while the ship is docked, thathe can leap off of the upper deck and just barely make it into the poolon the lower deck. If the ship leaves dock and is cruising rapidly, will thisadrenaline junkie still be able to make it?D You are a passenger in the open basket hanging under a heliumballoon. The balloon is being carried along by the wind at a constantvelocity. If you are holding a flag in your hand, will the flag wave? If so,which way? [Based on a question from PSSC Physics.]E Sally is on an amusement park ride which begins with her chair beinghoisted straight up a tower at a constant speed of 60 miles/hour. Despitestern warnings from her father that hell take her home the next time shemisbehaves, she decides that as a scientific experiment she really needsto release her corndog over the side as shes on the way up. She doesnot throw it. She simply sticks it out of the car, lets it go, and watches itagainst the background of the sky, with no trees or buildings as referencepoints. What does the corndogs motion look like as observed by Sally?Does its speed ever appear to her to be zero? What acceleration doesshe observe it to have: is it ever positive? negative? zero? What wouldher enraged father answer if asked for a similar description of its motionas it appears to him, standing on the ground?


1.3.1 Applications of calculusLets see how this relates to calculus. If an object is moving in

one dimension, we can describe its position with a function x(t). Thederivative v = dx/dt is called the velocity, and the second derivativea = dv/dt = d2x/dt2 is the acceleration. Galilean relativity tells usthat there is no detectable effect due to an objects absolute velocity,since in some other frame of reference, the objects velocity mightbe zero. However, an acceleration does have physical consequences.

g / This Air Force doctor volun-teered to ride a rocket sled as amedical experiment. The obviouseffects on his head and face arenot because of the sleds speedbut because of its rapid changesin speed: increasing in (ii) and(iii), and decreasing in (v) and (vi).In (iv) his speed is greatest, butbecause his speed is not increas-ing or decreasing very much atthis moment, there is little effecton him. (U.S. Air Force)

Observers in different inertial frames of reference will disagreeon velocities, but agree on accelerations. Lets keep it simple bycontinuing to work in one dimension. One frame of reference uses acoordinate system x1, and the other we label x2. If the positive x1and x2 axes point in the same direction, then in general two inertialframes could be related by an equation of the form x2 = x1+ b+ut,where u is the constant velocity of one frame relative to the other,and the constant b tells us how far apart the origins of the twocoordinate systems were at t = 0. The velocities are different in thetwo frames of reference:

dx2dt

=dx1dt

+ u ,

Suppose, for example, frame 1 is defined from the sidewalk, andframe 2 is fixed to a float in a parade that is moving to our left ata velocity u = 1 m/s. A dog that is moving to the right with avelocity v1 = dx1/dt = 3 m/s in the sidewalks frame will appear tobe moving at a velocity of v2 = dx2/dt = dx1/dt+u = 4 m/s in thefloats frame.


h / self-check

For acceleration, however, we have

d2x2dt2

=d2x1dt2

,

since the derivative of the constant u is zero. Thus an accelera-tion, unlike a velocity, can have a definite physical significance to allobservers in all frames of reference. If this wasnt true, then therewould be no particular reason to define a quantity called accelerationin the first place.

Self-CheckFigure h shows a bottle of beer sitting on a table in the dining car of atrain. Does the tilting of the surface tell us about the trains velocity, orits acceleration? What would a person in the train say about the bottlesvelocity? What about a person standing in a field outside and looking inthrough the window? What about the acceleration? . Answer, p. 708

1.4 A Preview of Some Modern PhysicsMommy, why do you and Daddy have to go to work? To makemoney, sweetie-pie. Why do we need money? To buy food.Why does food cost money? When small children ask a chainof why questions like this, it usually isnt too long before theirparents end up saying something like, Because thats just the wayit is, or, more honestly, I dont know the answer.

The same happens in physics. We may gradually learn to ex-plain things more and more deeply, but theres always the possibilitythat a certain observed fact, such as conservation of mass, will neverbe understood on any deeper level. Science, after all, uses limitedmethods to achieve limited goals, so the ultimate reason for all exis-tence will always be the province of religion. There is, however, anappealing explanation for conservation of mass, which is atomism,the theory that matter is made of tiny, unchanging particles. Theatomic hypothesis dates back to ancient Greece, but the first solidevidence to support it didnt come until around the eighteenth cen-tury, and individual atoms were never detected until about 1900.The atomic theory implies not only conservation of mass, but acouple of other things as well.

First, it implies that the total mass of one particular elementis conserved. For instance, lead and gold are both elements, and ifwe assume that lead atoms cant be turned into gold atoms, thenthe total mass of lead and the total mass of gold are separatelyconserved. Its as though there was not just a law against pickpock-eting, but also a law against surreptitiously moving money fromone of the victims pockets to the other. It turns out, however, thatalthough chemical reactions never change one type of atom into an-other, transmutation can happen in nuclear reactions, such as theones that created most of the elements in your body out of the pri-mordial hydrogen and helium that condensed out of the aftermath


of the Big Bang.

Second, atomism implies that mass is quantized, meaning thatonly certain values of mass are possible and the ones in betweencant exist. We can have three atoms of gold or four atoms of gold,but not three an a half. Although quantization of mass is a naturalconsequence of any theory in which matter is made up of tiny parti-cles, it was discovered in the twentieth century that other quantities,such as energy, are quantized as well, which had previously not beensuspected.

Self-CheckIs money quantized? . Answer, p. 708

If atomism is starting to make conservation of mass seem in-evitable to you, then it may disturb you to know that Einsteindiscovered it isnt really conserved. If you put a 50-gram iron nailin some water, seal the whole thing up, and let it sit on a fantasti-cally precise balance while the nail rusts, youll find that the systemloses about 6x 1012 kg of mass by the time the nail has turnedcompletely to rust. This has to do with Einsteins famous equa-tion E = mc2. Rusting releases heat energy, which then escapesout into the room. Einsteins equation states that this amount ofheat, E, is equivalent to a certain amount of mass, m. The c inthe c2 is the speed of light, which is a large number, and a largeamount of energy is therefore equivalent to a very small amount ofmass, so you dont notice nonconservation of mass under ordinaryconditions. What is really conserved is not the mass, m, but themass-plus-energy, E + mc2. The point of this discussion is not toget you to do numerical exercises with E = mc2 (at this point youdont even know what units are used to measure energy), but simplyto point out to you the empirical nature of the laws of physics. If apreviously accepted theory is contradicted by an experiment, thenthe theory needs to be changed. This is also a good example ofsomething called the correspondence principle, which is a historicalobservation about how scientific theories change: when a new scien-tific theory replaces an old one, the old theory is always containedwithin the new one as an approximation that works within a certainrestricted range of situations. Conservation of mass is an extremelygood approximation for all chemical reactions, since chemical reac-tions never release or consume enough energy to change the totalmass by a large percentage. Conservation of mass would not havebeen accepted for 110 years as a fundamental principle of physicsif it hadnt been verified over and over again by a huge number ofaccurate experiments.

This chapter is summarized on page 723. Notation and terminologyare tabulated on pages 719-720.

Section 1.4 A Preview of Some Modern Physics 29

ProblemsThe symbols

, , etc. are explained on page 32.

Problems 1-6 are intended to help you check up on your mathemat-ical skills. In my experience, most students can do most of theseproblems when they start a physics course, but very few studentscan do all of them. Ive written a complete introduction to theseskills in ch. 0 and 1 of my book Newtonian Physics, which isavailable as a free download from www.lightandmatter.com. Ratherthan duplicating that material in this book, Ive decided simply tosteer students to it if they need it.

1 Express each of the following quantities in micrograms: (a)10 mg, (b) 104 g, (c) 10 kg, (d) 100 103 g, (e) 1000 ng.

2 The speed of light is 3.0 108 m/s. Convert this to furlongsper fortnight. A furlong is 220 yards, and a fortnight is 14 days. Aninch is 2.54 cm.

3 How many significant figures are there in each of the followingmeasurements? (a) 9.937 m, (b) 4.0 s, (c) 0.0000037 kg.

4 How many cubic mm are there in a cubic meter? The answeris not 1000.

5 Assume that dogs and cats brains are the same shape, andthat their brain cells are also the same size and shape, but that adogs brain is twice as large as a cats in all its linear dimensions,i.e. any two points in a dogs brain are twice as far apart as thecorresponding two points in a cats. How many times more braincells does a dog have compared to a cat? The answer is not 2.

6 Make an order-of-magnitude estimate of the number of bladesof grass on a football field.

7 Thermometers normally use either mercury or alcohol as theirworking fluid. If the level of the fluid rises or falls, does this violateconservation of mass?

8 The ratios of the masses of different types of atoms were deter-mined a century before anyone knew any actual atomic masses inunits of kg. One finds, for example, that when ordinary table salt,NaCl, is melted, the chlorine atoms bubble off as a gas, leaving liq-uid sodium metal. Suppose the chlorine is allowed to escape, so thatits mass cannot be directly determined by weighing. Experimentsshow that when 1.00000 kg of NaCl is treated in this way, the massof the remaining sodium metal is 0.39337 kg. Based on this infor-mation, determine the ratio of the mass of a chlorine atom to thatof a sodium atom.

9 An atom of the most common naturally occurring uranium iso-tope breaks up spontaneously into a thorium atom plus a heliumatom. The masses are as follows:


Problem 12.

Problem 14.

uranium 3.95292849 1025 kgthorium 3.88638748 1025 kghelium 6.646481 1027 kg

Each of these experimentally determined masses is uncertain in itslast decimal place. Is mass conserved in this process to within theaccuracy of the experimental data? How would you interpret this?

10 If two spherical water droplets of radius b combine to make asingle droplet, what is its radius? (Assume that water has constantdensity.)

11 Make up an experiment that would test whether mass is con-served in an animals metabolic processes.

12 The figure shows a hydraulic jack. What is the relationshipbetween the distance traveled by the plunger and the distance trav-eled by the object being lifted, in terms of the cross-sectional areas?

13 In an example in this chapter, I argued that a stream of watermust change its cross-sectional area as it rises or falls. Suppose thatthe stream of water is confined to a constant-diameter pipe. Whichassumption breaks down in this situation?

14 A river with a certain width and depth splits into two parts,each of which has the same width and depth as the original river.What can you say about the speed of the current after the split?

15 The diagram shows a cross-section of a wind tunnel of thekind used, for example, to test designs of airplanes. Under nor-mal conditions of use, the density of the air remains nearly constantthroughout the whole wind tunnel. How can the speed of the airbe controlled and calculated? (Diagram by NASA, Glenn ResearchCenter.)

Problems 31

Problem 17.

16 A water wave is in a tank that extends horizontally from x = 0to x = a, and from z = 0 to z = b. We assume for simplicitythat at a certain moment in time the height y of the waters surfaceonly depends on x, not z, so that we can effectively ignore the zcoordinate. Under these assumptions, the total volume of the waterin the tank is

V = b a0y(x)dx .

Since the density of the water is essentially constant, conservationof mass requires that V is always the same. When the water is calm,we have y = h, where h = V/ab. If two different wave patterns moveinto each other, we might imagine that they would add in the sensethat ytotalh = (y1h)+ (y2h). Show that this type of additionis consistent with conservation of mass.17 The figure shows the position of a falling ball at equal timeintervals, depicted in a certain frame of reference. On a similar grid,show how the balls motion would appear in a frame of reference thatwas moving horizontally at a speed of one box per unit time relativeto the first frame.

Key to symbols:easy typical challenging difficult very difficultAn answer check is available at www.lightandmatter.com.


a / James Joule, 1818-1889.The son of a wealthy brewer,Joule was tutored as a youngman by the famous scientist JohnDalton. Fascinated by electricity,he and his brother experimentedby giving electric shocks to eachother and to the familys servants.Joule ran the brewery as an adult,and science was merely a serioushobby. His work on energy canbe traced to his attempt to buildan electric motor that wouldreplace steam engines. His ideaswere not accepted at first, partlybecause they contradicted thewidespread belief that heat wasa fluid, and partly because theydepended on extremely precisemeasurements, which had notpreviously been common inphysics.

Chapter 2Conservation of EnergyDo you pronounce it Joules to rhyme with schools,Joules to rhyme with Bowls,or Joules to rhyme with Scowls?Whatever you call it, by Joules,or Joules,or Joules, its good!

Advertising slogan of the Joule brewery. The name, and thecorresponding unit of energy, are now usually pronounced soas to rhyme with school.

2.1 Energy2.1.1 The energy concept

Youd probably like to be able to drive your car and light yourapartment without having to pay money for gas and electricity, andif you do a little websurfing, you can easily find people who saythey have the solution to your problem. This kind of scam has beenaround for centuries. It used to be known as a perpetual motionmachine, but nowadays the con artists preferred phrase is freeenergy.1 A typical free-energy machine would be a sealed boxthat heats your house without needing to be plugged into a wallsocket or a gas pipe. Heat comes out, but nothing goes in, and thiscan go on indefinitely. But an interesting thing happens if you tryto check on the advertised performance of the machine. Typically,youll find out that either the device is still in development, or itsback-ordered because so many people have already taken advantageof this Fantastic Opportunity! In a few cases, the magic box exists,but the inventor is only willing to demonstrate very small levels ofheat output for short periods of time, in which case theres probablya tiny hearing-aid battery hidden in there somewhere, or some othertrick.

Since nobody has ever succeeded in building a device that createsheat out of nothing, we might also wonder whether any device existsthat can do the opposite, turning heat into nothing. You might think

1An entertaining account of this form of quackery is given in Voodoo Sci-ence: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud, Robert Park, Oxford Univer-sity Press, 2000. Until reading this book, I hadnt realized the degree to whichpseudoscience had penetrated otherwise respectable scientific organizations likeNASA.

33

b / Heat energy can be con-verted to light energy. Very hotobjects glow visibly, and evenobjects that arent so hot giveoff infrared light, a color of lightthat lies beyond the red end ofthe visible rainbow. This photowas made with a special camerathat records infrared light. Themans warm skin emits quite abit of infrared light energy, whilehis hair, at a lower temperature,emits less.

that a refrigerator was such a device, but actually your refrigeratordoesnt destroy the heat in the food. What it really does is to extractsome of the heat and bring it out into the room. Thats why it hasbig radiator coils on the back, which get hot when its in operation.

If its not possible to destroy or create heat outright, then youmight start to suspect that heat was a conserved quantity. Thiswould be a successful rule for explaining certain processes, such asthe transfer of heat between a cold Martini and a room-temperatureolive: if the olive loses a little heat, then the drink must gain thesame amount. It would fail in general, however. Sunlight can heatyour skin, for example, and a hot lightbulb filament can cool off byemitting light. Based on these observations, we could revise our pro-posed conservation law, and say that there is something called heat-pluslight, which is conserved. Even this, however, needs to be gen-eralized in order to explain why you can get a painful burn playingbaseball when you slide into a base. Now we could call it heatplus-lightplusmotion. The word is getting pretty long, and we haventeven finished the list.

Rather than making the word longer and longer, physicists havehijacked the word energy from ordinary usage, and give it a new,specific technical meaning. Just as the Parisian platinum-iridiumkilogram defines a specific unit of mass, we need to pick somethingthat defines a definite unit of energy. The metric unit of energy isthe joule (J), and well define it as the amount of energy requiredto heat 0.24 grams of water from 20 to 21 degrees Celsius. (Dontmemorize the numbers.)2

Temperature of a mixture example 1. If 1.0 kg of water at 20 C is mixed with 4.0 kg of water at 30 C, whatis the temperature of the mixture?. Lets assume as an approximation that each degree of temperaturechange corresponds to the same amount of energy. In other words, weassume E=mcT , regardless of whether, as in the definition of thejoule, we have T = 21 C-20 C or, as in the present example, someother combination of initial and final temperatures. To be consistentwith the definition of the joule, we must have c = (1 J)/(0.24 g)/(1 C) =4.2103 J/kgC, which is referred to as the specific heat of water.

Conservation of energy tells us E = 0, so

m1cT1 + m2cT2 = 0

2Although the definition refers to the Celsius scale of temperature, its notnecessary to give an operational definition of the temperature concept in general(which turns out to be quite a tricky thing to do completely rigorously); weonly need to establish two specific temperatures that can be reproduced on ther-mometers that have been calibrated in a standard way. Heat and temperatureare discussed in more detail in section 2.4, and in chapter 5. Conceptually, heatis a measure of energy, whereas temperature relates to how concentrated thatenergy is.

34 Chapter 2 Conservation of Energy

or

T1T2

= m2m1

= 4.0 .

If T1 has to change four times as much as T2, and the two final temper-atures are equal, then the final temperature must be 28 C.

Note how only differences in temperature and energy appearedin the preceding example. In other words, we dont have to makeany assumptions about whether there is a temperature at which allan objects heat energy is removed. Historically, the energy andtemperature units were invented before it was shown that there issuch a temperature, called absolute zero. There is a scale of tem-perature, the Kelvin scale, in which the unit of temperature is thesame as the Celsius degree, but the zero point is defined as absolutezero. But as long as we only deal with temperature differences, itdoesnt matter whether we use Kelvin or Celsius. Likewise, as longas we deal with differences in heat energy, we dont normally haveto worry about the total amount of heat energy the object has. Instandard physics terminology, heat is used only to refer to differ-ences, while the total amount is called the objects thermal energy.This distinction is often ignored by scientists in casual speech, andin this book Ill usually use heat for either quantity.

Were defining energy by adding up things from a list, which welengthen as needed: heat, light, motion, etc. One objection to thisapproach is aesthetic: physicists tend to regard complication as asynonym for ugliness. If we have to keep on adding more and moreforms of energy to our laundry list, then its starting to sound likeenergy is distressingly complicated. Luckily it turns out that energyis simpler than it seems. Many forms of energy that are apparentlyunrelated turn out to be manifestations of a small number of formsat the atomic level, and this is the topic of section 2.4.

Discussion QuestionsA The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that objects naturallytended to slow down, unless there was something pushing on them tokeep them moving. What important insight was he missing?

Section 2.1 Energy 35

c / As in figure b, an infraredcamera distinguishes hot andcold areas. As the bike skids toa stop with its brakes locked, thekinetic energy of the bike andrider is converted into heat inboth the floor (top) and the tire(bottom).

2.1.2 Logical issuesAnother possible objection is that the open-ended approach to

defining energy might seem like a kind of cheat, since we keep oninventing new forms whenever we need them. If a certain experi-ment seems to violate conservation of energy, cant we just inventa new form of invisible mystery energy that patches things up?This would be like balancing your checkbook by putting in a faketransaction that makes your calculation of the balance agree withyour banks. If we could fudge this way, then conservation of energywould be untestable impossible to prove or disprove.

Actually all scientific theories are unprovable. A theory cannever be proved, because the experiments can only cover a finitenumber out of the infinitely many situations in which the theory issupposed to apply. Even a million experiments wont suffice to proveit in the same sense of the word proof that is used in mathematics.However, even one experiment that contradicts a theory is sufficientto show that the theory is wrong. A theory that is immune todisproof is a bad theory, because there is no way to test it. Forinstance, if I say that 23 is the maximum number of angels thatcan dance on the head of a pin, I havent made a properly falsifiablescientific theory, since theres no method by which anyone could evenattempt to prove me wrong based on observations or experiments.

Conservation of energy is testable because new forms of energyare expected to show regular mathematical behavior, and are sup-posed to be related in a measurable way to observable phenomena.As an example, lets see how to extend the energy concept to includemotion.


d / A simplified drawing ofJoules paddlewheel experiment.

e / The heating of the tireand floor in figure c is somethingthat the average person mighthave predicted in advance, butthere are other situations whereits not so obvious. When aball slams into a wall, it doesntrebound with the same amount ofkinetic energy. Was some energydestroyed? No. The ball andthe wall heat up. These infraredphotos show a squash ball atroom temperature (top), and afterit has been played with for severalminutes (bottom), causing it toheat up detectably.

2.1.3 Kinetic energyEnergy of motion is called kinetic energy . (The root of the word

is the same as the word cinema in French, kinetic energy isenergie cinetique.) How does an objects kinetic energy dependon its mass and velocity? Joule attempted a conceptually simpleexperiment on his honeymoon in the French-Swiss Alps near Mt.Chamonix, in which he measured the difference in temperature be-tween the top and bottom of a waterfall. The water at the top ofthe falls has some gravitational energy, which isnt our subject rightnow, but as it drops, that gravitational energy is converted into ki-netic energy, and then into heat energy due to internal friction inthe churning pool at the bottom:

gravitational energy kinetic energy heat energy

In the logical framework of this books presentation of energy, thesignificance of the experiment is that it provides a way to find outhow an objects kinetic energy depends on its mass and velocity. Theincrease in heat energy should equal the kinetic energy of the waterjust before impact, so in principle we could measure the watersmass, velocity, and kinetic energy, and see how they relate to oneanother.3

Although the story is picturesque and memorable, most booksthat mention the experiment fail to note that it was a failure! Theproblem was that heat wasnt the only form of energy being released.In reality, the situation was more like this:

gravitational energy kinetic energy

heat energy+ sound energy+ energy of partial evaporation

The successful version of the experiment, shown in figures d andf, used a paddlewheel spun by a dropping weight. As with thewaterfall experiment, this one involves several types of energy, butthe difference is that in this case, they can all be determined and

3From Joules point of view, the point of the experiment was different. Atthat time, most physicists believed that heat was a quantity that was conservedseparately from the rest of the things to which we now refer as energy, i.e.mechanical energy. Separate units of measurement had been constructed forheat and mechanical of energy, but Joule was trying to show that one couldconvert back and forth between them, and that it was actually their sum thatwas conserved, if they were both expressed in consistent units. His main resultwas the conversion factor that would allow the two sets of units to be reconciled.By showing that the conversion factor came out the same in different typesof experiments, he was supporting his assertion that heat was not separatelyconserved. From Joules perspective or from ours, the result is to connect themysterious, invisible phenomenon of heat with forms of energy that are visibleproperties of objects, i.e. mechanical energy.


f / A realistic drawing of Joules apparatus, based on the illustrationin his original paper. The paddlewheel is sealed inside the can in themiddle. Joule wound up the two 13-kg lead weights and dropped them1.6 meters, repeating this 20 times to produce a temperature changeof only about half a degree Fahrenheit in the water inside the sealedcan. He claimed in his paper to be able to measure temperatures to anaccuracy of 1/200 of a degree.

taken into account. (Joule even took the precaution of putting ascreen between himself and the can of water, so that the infraredlight emitted by his warm body wouldnt warm it up at all!) Theresult4 is

K =12mv2 [kinetic energy] .

Whenever you encounter an equation like this for the first time,you should get in the habit of interpreting it. First off, we can tellthat by making the mass or velocity greater, wed get more kineticenergy. That makes sense. Notice, however, that we have mass tothe first power, but velocity to the second. Having the whole thingproportional to mass to the first power is necessary on theoreticalgrounds, since energy is supposed to be additive. The dependenceon v2 couldnt have been predicted, but it is sensible. For instance,suppose we reverse the direction of motion. This would reverse thesign of v, because in one dimension we use positive and negative signsto indicate the direction of motion. But since v2 is what appears inthe equation, the resulting kinetic energy is unchanged.

What about the factor of 1/2 in front? It comes out to beexactly 1/2 by the design of the metric system. If wed been usingthe old-fashioned British engineering system of units (which is nolonger used in the U.K.), the equation would have been K = (7.44

4If youve had a previous course in physics, you may have seen this presentednot as an empirical result but as a theoretical one, derived from Newtons laws,and in that case you might feel youre being cheated here. However, Im go-ing to reverse that reasoning and derive Newtons laws from the conservationlaws in chapter 3. From the modern perspective, conservation laws are morefundamental, because they apply in cases where Newtons laws dont.


102 Btu s2/slug ft2)mv2. The version of the metric system calledthe SI,5 in which everything is based on units of kilograms, meters,and seconds, not only has the numerical constant equal to 1/2, butmakes it unitless as well. In other words, we can think of the jouleas simply an abbreviation, 1 J=1 kg m2/s2. More familiar examplesof this type of abbreviation are 1 minute=60 s, and the metric unitof land area, 1 hectare=10000 m2.

Ergs and joules example 2. There used to be two commonly used systems of metric units, referredto as mks and cgs. The mks system, now called the SI, is based on themeter, the kilogram, and the second. The cgs system, which is nowobsolete, was based on the centimeter, the gram, and the second. Inthe cgs system, the unit of energy is not the joule but the erg, 1 erg=1g cm2/s2. How many ergs are in one joule?. The simplest approach is to treat the units as if they were algebrasymbols.

1 J = 1 kg m2

s2

= 1 kg m2

s2 1000 g1 kg

(100 cm

1 m

)2= 107 g cm

2

s2

= 107 erg

If you have trouble understanding this example, you should study ch. 0and 1 of my book Newtonian Physics.

Cabin air in a jet airplane example 3. A jet airplane typically cruises at a velocity of 270 m/s. Outside air iscontinuously pumped into the cabin, but must be cooled off first, bothbecause (1) it heats up due to friction as it enters the engines, and(2) it is heated as a side-effect of being compressed to cabin pressure.Calculate the increase in temperature due to the first effect. The specificheat of dry air is about 1.0103 J/kgC.. This is easiest to understand in the frame of reference of the plane, inwhich the air rushing into the engine is stopped, and its kinetic energyconverted into heat.6 Conservation of energy tells us

0 = E= K + Eheat .

In the planes frame of reference, the airs initial velocity is vi=270 m/s,and its final velocity is zero, so the change in its kinetic energy is nega-

5Syste`me International6Its not at all obvious that the solution would work out in the earths frame of

reference, although Galilean relativity states that it doesnt matter which framewe use. Chapter 3 discusses the relationship between conservation of energy andGalilean relativity.


tive,

K = Kf Ki= 0 (1/2)mvi 2= (1/2)mvi 2 .

Assuming that the specific heat of air is roughly independent of temper-ature (which is why the number was stated with the word about), wecan substitute into 0 = K + Eheat , giving

0 = 12mvi2 + mcT

12vi

2= cT .

Note how the mass cancels out. This is a big advantage of solvingproblems algebraically first, and waiting until the end to plug in numbers.With a purely numerical approach, we wouldnt even have known whatvalue of m to pick, or if wed guessed a value like 1 kg, we wouldnt haveknown whether our answer depended on that guess.

Solving for T , and writing v instead of vi for simplicity, we find

T = v2

2c 40C .

The passengers would be boiled alive if not for the refrigeration. Thefirst stage of cooling happens via heat exchangers in the engine struts,but a second stage, using a refrigerator under the floor of the cabin, isalso necessary. Running this refrigerator uses up energy, cutting intothe fuel efficiency of the airplane, which is why typically only 50% ofthe cabins air is replaced in each pumping cycle of 2-3 minutes. Theairlines emphasize that this is a much faster recirculation rate than inthe ventilation systems of most buildings, but people are packed moretightly in an airplane.


2.1.4 PowerPower, P , is defined as the rate of change of energy, dE/dt.

Power thus has units of joules per second, which are usually abbre-viated as watts, 1 W=1 J/s. Since energy is conserved, we wouldhave dE/dt = 0 if E was the total energy of a closed system, andthats not very interesting. Whats usually more interesting to dis-cuss is either the power flowing in or out of an open system, or therate at which energy is being transformed from one form into an-other. The following is an example of energy flowing into an opensystem.

Heating by a lightbulb example 4. The electric company bills you for energy in units of kilowatt-hours(kilowatts multiplied by hours) rather than in SI units of joules. Howmany joules is a kilowatt-hour?. 1 kilowatt-hour = (1 kW)(1 hour) = (1000 J/s)(3600 s) = 3.6 MJ.Now heres an example of energy being transformed from one

form into another.

Human wattage example 5. Food contains chemical energy (discussed in more detail in section2.4), and for historical reasons, food energy is normally given in non-SIunits of Calories. One Calorie with a capital C equals 1000 calories,and 1 calorie is defined as 4.18 J. A typical person consumes 2000Calories of food in a day, and converts nearly all of that directly to bodyheat. Compare the persons heat production to the rate of energy con-sumption of a 100-watt lightbulb.. Strictly speaking, we cant really compute the derivative dE/dt , sincewe dont know how the persons metabolism ebbs and flows over thecourse of a day. What we can really compute is E/t , which is thepower averaged over a one-day period.

Converting to joules, we find E = 8 106 J for the amount ofenergy transformed into heat within our bodies in one day. Convertingthe time interval likewise into SI units, t = 9 104 s. Dividing, we findthat our power is 90 J/s = 90 W, about the same as a lightbulb.


g / A skateboarder rises tothe edge of an empty pool andthen falls back down.

h / The sum of kinetic plusgravitational energy is constant.

2.1.5 Gravitational energyGravitational energy, to which Ive already alluded, is different

from heat and kinetic energy in an important way. Heat and kineticenergy are properties of a single object, whereas gravitational energydescribes an interaction between two objects. When the skater infigures g and h is at the top, his distance from the bulk of the planetearth is greater. Since we observe his kinetic energy decreasing onthe way up, there must be some other form of energy that is increas-ing. We invent a new form of energy, called gravitational energy, andwritten U or Ug, which depends on the distance between his bodyand the planet. Where is this energy? Its not in the skaters body,and its not inside the earth, either, since it takes two to tango. Ifeither object didnt exist, there wouldnt be any interaction or anyway to measure a distance, so it wouldnt make sense to talk abouta distance-dependent energy. Just as marriage is a relationship be-tween two people, gravitational energy is a relationship between twoobjects.

There is no precise way to define the distance between the skaterand the earth, since both are objects that have finite size. As dis-cussed in more detail in section 2.3, gravity is one of the fundamen-tal forces of nature, a universal attraction between any two particlesthat have mass. Each atom in the skaters body is at a definite dis-tance from each atom in the earth, but each of these distances isdifferent. An atom in his foot is only a few centimeters from someof the atoms in the plaster side of the pool, but most of the earthsatoms are thousands of kilometers away from him. In theory, wemight have to add up the contribution to the gravitational energyfor every interaction between an atom in the skaters body and anatom in the earth.

For our present purposes, however, there is a far simpler andmore practical way to solve problems. In any region of the earthssurface, there is a direction called down, which we can establishby dropping a rock or hanging a plumb bob. In figure h, the skater ismoving up and down in one dimension, and if we did measurementsof his kinetic energy, like the made-up data in the figure, we couldinfer his gravitational energy. As long as we stay within a relativelysmall range of heights, we find that an objects gravitational energyincreases at a steady rate with height. In other words, the strengthof gravity doesnt change much if you only move up or down a fewmeters. We also find that the gravitational energy is proportionalto the mass of the object were testing. Writing y for the height,and g for the overall constant of proportionality, we have

Ug = mgy . [gravitational energy; y=height; only ac-curate within a small range of heights]

The number g, with units of joules per kilogram per meter, is calledthe gravitational field . It tells us the strength of gravity in a certain


region of space. Near the surface of our planet, it has a value ofabout 9.8 J/kg m, which is conveniently close to 10 J/kg m forrough calculations.

Velocity at the bottom of a drop example 6. If the skater in figure g drops 3 meters from rest, what is his velocityat the bottom of the pool?. Starting from conservation of energy, we have

0 = E= K + U= Kf Ki + Uf Ui=

12mvf

2 + mgyf mgyi (because Ki=0)

=12mvf

2 + mgy , (y

y axis points up), as we can easily show using the chain rule:

(dvdt

)=(dvdK

)(dKdU

)(dUdy

)(dydt

)=(

1mv

)(1)(mg)(v)

= g ,

where Ive calculated dv/dK as 1/(dK/dv), and dK/dU = 1 canbe found by differentiating K+U = (constant) to give dK+dU = 0.

We can also check that the units of g, J/kgm, are equivalent tothe units of acceleration,

Jkgm =

kgm2/s2kgm =

ms2

,

and therefore the strength of the gravitational field near the earthssurface can just as well be stated as 10 m/s2.

Speed after a given time example 7. An object falls from rest. How fast is it moving after two seconds?Assume that the amount of energy converted to heat by air friction isnegligible.. Under the stated assumption, we have a = g, which can be inte-grated to give v = gt + constant. If we let t = 0 be the beginning ofthe fall, then the constant of integration is zero, so at t = 2 s we havev = gt = (10 m/s2) (2 s) = 20 m/s.The Vomit Comet example 8. The U.S. Air Force has an airplane, affectionately known as the VomitComet, in which astronaut trainees can experience simulated weight-lessness. The plane climbs up high, and then drops straight down like arock, and since the people are falling with the same acceleration as theplane, the sensation is just like what youd experience if you went out ofthe earths gravitational field. If the plane can start from 10 km up, whatis the maximum amount of time for which the dive can last?. Based on data about acceleration and distance, we want to find time.Acceleration is the second derivative of distance, so if we integrate theacceleration twice with respect to time, we can find how position relatesto time. For convenience, lets pick a coordinate system in which thepositive y axis is down, so a=g instead of g.

a = gv = gt + constant (integrating)

= gt (starts from rest)y = 12gt

2 + constant (integrating again)

Choosing our coordinate system to have y = 0 at t = 0, we can make


j / How much energy is re-quired to raise the submergedbox through a height y?

i / Two balls start from rest,and roll from A to B by differentpaths.

the second constant of integration equal zero as well, so

t =

2yg

=

2 10000 m

10 m/s2

=

2000 s2

= 40 s (to one sig. fig.)Note that if we hadnt converted the altitude to units of meters, we wouldhave gotten the wrong answer, but we would have been alerted to theproblem because the units inside the square root wouldnt have comeout to be s2. In general, its a good idea to convert all your data into SI(meter-kilogram-second) units before you do anything with them.High road, low road example 9. In figure i, what can you say based on conservation of energy aboutthe speeds of the balls when the reach point B? What does conservationof energy tell you about which ball will get there first? Assume frictiondoesnt convert any mechanical energy to heat or sound energy.. Since friction is assumed to be negligible, there are only two forms ofenergy involved: kinetic and gravitational. Since both balls start fromrest, and both lose the same amount of gravitational energy, they musthave the same kinetic energy at the end, and therefore theyre rolling atthe same speed when they reach B. (A subtle point is that the balls havekinetic energy both because theyre moving through space and becausetheyre spinning as they roll. These two types of energy must be in fixedproportion to one another, so this has no effect on the conclusion.)

Conservation of energy does not, however, tell us anything obviousabout which ball gets there first. This is a general problem with applyingconservation laws: conservation laws dont refer directly to time, sincethey are statements that something stays the same at all moments intime. We expect on intuitive grounds that the ball that goes by the lowerramp gets to B first, since it builds up speed early on.Buoyancy example 10. A cubical box with mass m and volume V = b3 is submerged in a fluidof density . How much energy is required to raise it through a heighty?. As the box moves up, it invades a volume V = b2y previously oc-cupied by some of the fluid, and fluid flows into an equal volume that ithas vacated on the bottom. Lowering this amount of fluid by a height breduces the fluids gravitational energy by V gb = gb3y , so the netchange in energy is

E = mgy gb3y= (m V )gy .

In other words, its as if the mass of the box had been reduced by anamount equal to the fluid that otherwise would have occupied that vol-ume. This is known as Archimedes principle, and it is true even if thebox is not a cube, although well defer the more general proof until page149 in the following chapter. If the box is less dense than the fluid, thenit will float.


l / The biceps muscle is areversed lever.

k / A seesaw.

A simple machine example 11. If the father and son on the seesaw in figure k start from rest, what willhappen?. Note that although the father is twice as massive, he is at half thedistance from the fulcrum. If the seesaw was going to start rotating, itwould have to be losing gravitational energy in order to gain some ki-netic energy. However, there is no way for it to gain or lose gravitationalenergy by rotating in either direction. The change in gravitational energywould be

U = U1 + U2= g(m1y1 + m2y2) ,

but y1 and y2 have opposite signs and are in the proportion of twoto one, since the son moves along a circular arc that covers the sameangle as the fathers but has half the radius. Therefore U = 0, andthere is no way for the seesaw to trade gravitational energy for kinetic.The seesaw example demonstrates the principle of the lever,

which is one of the basic mechanical building blocks known as sim-ple machines. As discussed in more detail in chapters 3 and 4, theprinciple applies even when the

Documents

Simple Nature