37
Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 – Alberta and Canada Presentation to CIF-RMS Workshop and AGM May 11, 2017

Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 – Alberta and Canada

Presentation to CIF-RMS Workshop and AGM

May 11, 2017

Page 2: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Introduction

• The value proposition for herbicides in silviculture

• A bit of history x herbicides in Alberta

• The current state of herbicide use in Alberta and Canada

• Challenges confronting herbicide use

• A couple of possible futures

2017/05/12 MMM 2

Page 3: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Value Proposition

• ABSTRACT ... Aerial herbicide treatments produced the highest NPV, BCR, and IRR. Internal rates of return of 4.32%, 2.90%, 2.82% and 2.50% for aerial herbicide, manual brush cutting, ground-applied herbicide, and brush cutting plus herbicide treatments, respectively, indicated that all of the vegetation management alternatives evaluated are economically viable.

• Benefit–cost analysis of vegetation management alternatives: An Ontario case study by Krish Homagain1,2, Chander K. Shahi1, Nancy J. Luckai1, Mathew Leitch1 and F. Wayne Bell3

2017/05/12 MMM 3

Page 4: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Value Proposition

ConclusionsThe longest-term data from 60 controlled experiments around the world have demonstrated that substantial gains in wood volume yield can be obtained when competing vegetation is effectivelymanaged. About 25 per cent of the studies in Table 1 had volume gains from 100 to 200 per cent. Over half (55 per cent) had 50 – 300 per centyield increases. Three-quarters (74 per cent) of the studies produced yield gains from 30 to 500per cent.

The role of vegetation managementfor enhancing productivity of theworld’s forestsROBERT G. WAGNER 1* , KEITH M. LITTLE 2 , BRIAN RICHARDSON 3

and KEN McNABB 4

2017/05/12 MMM 4

Page 5: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Value Proposition

• Harri Liljalehto "Before we had Vision silviculture was just not fun."

– In many cases we can replace herbicides with money or time.

– In the case of disclimax Calamagrostis canadensis we have few to no options.

2017/05/12 MMM 5

Page 6: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Value Proposition

ANC Block 1012 – Sprayed 1994 ANC Block 1012 – Not Sprayed

Photos Taken 2008, 14 Years after Treatment2017/05/12 MMM 6

Page 7: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

• During the mid to late 1980's herbicide use for stand tending moved into the mainstream of Canadian reforestation

• But not in Alberta - due to political pressure there was a de facto moratorium on herbicide use

2017/05/12 MMM 7

Page 8: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

• With the development of the Performance reforestation survey some foresters foresaw a need for herbicides - Daryl D'amico and Murray Summers foremost among them

• They built a value case for herbicides to the point where the "moratorium" was set aside

2017/05/12 MMM 8

Page 9: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

• The "moratorium" did not go quietly

– Herbicide use was put on a "go-slow" curve

– Prescriptions had to be justified based on competitive burden

– Herbicides had to be demonstrated to be safe and effective - in Alberta - before they could be added to the list of operational products

2017/05/12 MMM 9

Page 10: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

• Alberta adapted BC application processes:– In-block weather monitors

– Low drift application technology

– Rigorous risk management protocols

• Standardized procedures to assess for, and report, off-target applications were implemented

• Mix site locations required regulatory approval

2017/05/12 MMM 10

Page 11: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

2017/05/12 MMM 11

Page 12: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

2017/05/12 MMM 12

Page 13: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

A Bit of History

• Net result was a higher level of diligence in herbicide prescription and use - compared to other provinces - except maybe BC

• Science-based approach to risk assessment and mitigation

2017/05/12 MMM 13

Page 14: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Area Harvested - Canada

2017/05/12 MMM 14

Page 15: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Herbicide Use in Canada

2017/05/12 MMM 15

Page 16: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Area Harvested - Alberta

2017/05/12 MMM 16

Page 17: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Herbicide Use in AB

2017/05/12 MMM 17

Page 18: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Herbicide Use Compared – AB to CA

16

1920

16

46

39

35

25

2000 2005 2010 2015

Herbicide Use Expressed as Percent of Harvest

CA AB

2017/05/12 MMM 18

Page 19: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Herbicide Use – by Province

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Herbicide Use, by Province (ha)

NB ON AB BC

2017/05/12 MMM 19

Page 20: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Innovation

• In the mid to late 1990’s Alberta led Canada in innovation

– Adoption of Accu-Flow© nozzles for routine application

– GPS guidance and treatment recording systems

– Monitoring wind speeds at release height

2017/05/12 MMM 20

Page 21: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Innovation

• Currently

– ON and NB are adopting Accu-Flow© nozzles

– Note that Irving has used Accu-Flow© nozzles for several years

– Irving is adopting Smart-boom© technology

– Several AB applicators and Irving are using Intelli-valve© booms to better maintain calibration

2017/05/12 MMM 21

Page 22: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Innovation

• What we are not using

– Spray-Advisor – spatial version of the AG-DISP model that allows us to include terrain and block size in our assessment of risk and risk mitigation systems

– AIMMS probe technology to get quantitative assessments of weather at release height

2017/05/12 MMM 22

Page 23: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• Public perception

– Risk and benefit are not aligned

• Forest companies benefit – forest users incur risk

– See herbicides as a mechanism to object to “industrialization of the forest”

2017/05/12 MMM 23

Page 24: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• Concern mostly raised in ON in ~2003 – 2006

– Glyphosate is poisonous to amphibians

– Relyea papers

2017/05/12 MMM 24

Page 25: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• Thompson 5-level response

– Bench top

– Aquarium

– Aquatic microcosm

– Aquatic mesocosm

– Operational scale

• Used according to label glyphosate is NOT toxic to amphibians

2017/05/12 MMM 25

Page 26: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• IARC – raised in NB 2015 – 2016

– Adjunct body to World Health Organization

– Focus is on identification and management of carcinogenicity

– "Found" glyphosate is a possible carcinogen

2017/05/12 MMM 26

Page 27: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• IARC

– Finding based on re-interpretation of existing data plus one paper

– Contend that US EPA, Canadian PMRA, German pesticide regulator misunderstood data and implications

• Sparked substantial and immediate response

2017/05/12 MMM 27

Page 28: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• IARC

– WHO asked IARC to review the finding.

– Response - glyphosate is a probable carcinogen

2017/05/12 MMM 28

Page 29: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - External

• WHO position statement

– The JMPR has concluded this week that glyphosate based herbicides are “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans”. This is very strong language on behalf of the JMPR and contravenes the conclusions of the risk level posed by the IARC Monograph of 2015.

2017/05/12 MMM 29

Page 30: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - Internal

• Moving to generic products means manufacturers abandon product support and stewardship efforts to reduce costs

– Support, in depth, is lacking

– E.g. IARC report resulted in a push for banning glyphosate in forestry in NB.

– Thompson and Pitt from Forestry Canada responded – both retired in 2016

2017/05/12 MMM 30

Page 31: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - Internal

• The forestry market is a trivial piece of the glyphosate business:

– 95,500 ha or 275,000 L

– Glyphosate tolerant crops in Canada totalled

• 5,800,000 ha – 14,500,000 L in 2005

• 12,000,000 ha – 30,000,000 in 2015

2017/05/12 MMM 31

Page 32: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Challenges - Internal

• Risk management has become a rote activity

– Practitioners are complacent – herbicides have become “business as usual”

– Practitioners do not understand the science behind risk management and push the envelope

• Recent trend upward in total number and severity of off-target application in reports to AAF/AEP

• Calibration of aircraft is routinely done using agricultural operating conditions and drop heights

2017/05/12 MMM 32

Page 33: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Sum of All Challenges

• We are not doing as good a job as we are able to

• We no longer have a strong technical support net

• “Concerns” with forest herbicide use have not gone away

• In sum - we are poorly positioned to deal with a concerted, organized push to restrict (or prohibit) forestry herbicide use

2017/05/12 MMM 33

Page 34: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Two Futures

• Build on our successes and move closer toward integrative silvicultural practice that includes herbicide use

– Quantitative demonstration of herbicide value in forest management planning

– Linkages to sustainability and sustained income for forest communities

2017/05/12 MMM 34

Page 35: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Two Futures

• Strengthen the understanding of spray cloud dynamics on the part of project managers and applicators

– E.g. the recently cancelled Advanced Forest Vegetation Management Course delivered by MCFT

– Use of the SprayAdvisorTM extension to ArcGIS

2017/05/12 MMM 35

Page 36: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Two Futures

OR

2017/05/12 MMM 36

Page 37: Silvicultural Use of Herbicides in 2017 Alberta and Canada

Two Futures

• Lose the use of herbicides

2017/05/12 MMM 37