SiliSilicon Valleyll Storageg Symposiumyp · Supporting the Energy Storage Industry Bringing Technical Market and Policy Bringing Technical, Market, and Policy matt i t ti ith btters

Sili llSilicon ValleySilicon Valley Energy Storage SymposiumEnergy Storage Symposiumgy g y p

May 30, 2012Microsoft Auditorium

Mountain View, California,

Event Partners ExhibitorsMedia PartnersEvent Partners ExhibitorsMedia Partners

LOCAL INDUSTRY BRIEFINGLOCAL INDUSTRY BRIEFINGLOCAL INDUSTRY BRIEFING

Eric WesoffEric WesoffEditor in ChiefEditor in Chief

Greentech MediaGreentech Media

Silicon Valley Energy Storage SymposiumMay 30, 2012Mountain View CaliforniaMountain View, California





C lChCalChargeCalChargeE St I ti C t l tEnergy Storage Innovation CatalystEnergy Storage Innovation CatalystEnergy Storage Innovation Catalyst

Doug Davenport, LBNLdtdavenport@lbl [email protected]

Paul Frankel CalCEFPaul Frankel, [email protected] g

C lChCalChargeCalChargeEnergy Storage Innovation CatalystEnergy Storage Innovation Catalyst

LBNL CalCEF and a few founding partners will LBNL, CalCEF, and a few founding partners will launch CalCharge to accelerate the pace of launch CalCharge to accelerate the pace of b tt i ti i C lif ibattery innovation in California.

• In-LabCollaboration

Training &TechnologyCollaboration

gEducation

gyDevelopment • Professional

Developmentp

k t • Market & Policy

Regional Markets & IntelligenceCluster Policy

g

E i • Economic Resources

6

Our Goal: Form California’s “Center of Gravity” for Our Goal: Form California s Center of Gravity for battery innovation in Silicon Valley.battery innovation in Silicon Valley.

Th iti l i di t ll hThe critical ingredients are all hereg

30+ emerging batter technolog companies 30+ emerging battery technology companies

W ld l R D d i tit ti World-class R&D resources and institutions

1st in CleanTech investment and patent filings p g

Enlightened policy, early adopter culture Enlightened policy, early adopter culture

Leadership in clean technology development Leadership in clean technology development

CalCharge strives to bring them togetherCalCharge strives to bring them together

7

A Platform for Energy Storage A Platform for Energy Storage InnovationInnovation

C ll b ti ith l di b tt i ti t Collaboration with leading battery scientists

Access lab-grade resources for development g p

New development partnerships and collaborations New development partnerships and collaborations

Links to incubators commercialization and field trial partners Links to incubators, commercialization, and field trial partners

Transportation

Consumer Electrical Co su e ElectronicsGrid

8

World Class Science & EngineeringWorld Class Science & Engineering

L t f b tt d l t i ti t h Largest group of battery development scientists, anywhere

True experts in Li-ion cells, flow cells, and advanced batteries

Lab-scale battery fabrication, testing, and development facilities Lab scale battery fabrication, testing, and development facilities

World-class user facilities in materials development and microscopy World-class user facilities in materials development and microscopy

Industry oriented approach to collaboration Industry-oriented approach to collaboration

I t di i li t i l h i t t li ti Interdisciplinary materials, chemistry, systems, applications

9

Supporting the Energy Storage Supporting the Energy Storage Industry Industry

Bringing Technical Market and Policy Bringing Technical, Market, and Policy tt i t ti ith bmatters into conversation with members

i i Battery Universityy y Advanced training in battery design & g y g

applicationsapplications

Informative webinars & networking Informative webinars & networkingC i S S S i 20 3 Core partner in SV Energy Storage Summit 2013

Local networking events and topical webinars Local networking events and topical webinars

10

Joining CalChargeJoining CalCharge

C ll b i h i f bCollaboration mechanisms for members Eliminates contracting delays assures confidentiality Eliminates contracting delays, assures confidentiality

New dedicated lab space and testing equipment New dedicated lab space and testing equipment f C lCh ll b tifor CalCharge collaboration

Strategic agreements with other regional institutions Strategic agreements with other regional institutions in the works

C lCh ill ti i t i d ANL/LBNLCalCharge will participate in proposed ANL/LBNL-led DOE Energy Storage Hubled DOE Energy Storage Hub

11

Joining CalChargeJoining CalChargeg g

Initially reaching…Initially reaching… E i B tt C i d l i i ti f d i Emerging Battery Companies: developing innovations for devices,

t t idtransport, grid Large Battery Producers: interested to support development of g y pp p

technology and talentgy

Potential Additional Members Major Battery Users: transportation grid consumer sector companies Major Battery Users: transportation, grid, consumer sector companies

that drive needs and opportunitiesthat drive needs and opportunitiesi i i i i f Policy Makers: government leadership shaping the direction of energy

i istorage applications Local Economic Development: business incubators and accelerators Local Economic Development: business incubators and accelerators,

workforce developmentworkforce development

12

iFor membership, please contact:

Doug Davenport at LBNLg [email protected]@lbl.gov

Paul Frankel at CalCEFPaul Frankel at CalCEFpaul frankel@calcef [email protected]

CalChargeCalChargegEnergy Storage Innovation CatalystEnergy Storage Innovation Catalyst





PANEL DISCUSSIONPANEL DISCUSSION:PANEL DISCUSSION:Grid Level StorageGrid‐Level Storageg

Edward Cazalet, MegaWatt Storage Farms, g gH h K th EPRIHaresh Kamath, EPRIJon Eric Thalman Pacific Gas & ElectricJon Eric Thalman, Pacific Gas & ElectricAmy Guy Wagner Energy & Environmental EconomicsAmy Guy Wagner, Energy & Environmental EconomicsDavid Rummler (moderator), CleanTech Strategy Group andDavid Rummler (moderator), CleanTech Strategy Group and Stanford University Civil & Environmental EngineeringStanford University Civil & Environmental Engineering






S B b i hSteve BerberichSteve BerberichPresident and Chief E ec ti e OfficerPresident and Chief Executive Officer

C lif i I d d t S t O t C tiCalifornia Independent System Operator Corporationp y p p






C E S P BCALIFORNIA ENERGY STORAGE POLICY BRIEFING

Janice LinJanice LinlManaging Partner, Strategen Consulting, LLC

Executive Director, California Energy Storage Alliance, gy g

Strategen OverviewStrategen Overview

We combine strategic thinking with deep industry expertise to create profitable businesses

Strategen Core Team Clean Tech Manufacturers / S i P idStrategen Core Team Service Providers

Partners

Technology Specialists Corporations Exploring CleanTechnology Specialists

St t d Fi

Corporations Exploring Clean Energy OpportunitiesStructured Finance Energy Opportunities

Controls & Smart Grid

Project Developers Private Equity / VC Firms Tariff and Rate Specialists

q y /Investing in Clean Techp

A sampling of our clients:A sampling of our clients:U.S.

Department ofDepartment of Energy

Confidential20

Why California?Why California? Energy Storage is fundamental to many key California policyEnergy Storage is fundamental to many key California policy

i i i iinitiatives» BIG: 13% of US GDP, 8th largest economy in the world, ahead of Canada and Spain.

» ‘Foundational’ Legislation Energy Storage Procurement Targets: (AB 2514) RPS Legislation (SB X1‐2)

S lf G i I i P SGIP (SB 412 AB1150)) Self‐Generation Incentive Program: SGIP (SB 412, AB1150)) S t G id S t (SB 17) Smart Grid Systems (SB 17)

Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) Solar Energy System Incentives: CSI (SB 1) Solar Energy System Incentives: CSI (SB 1)

» Pro storage policy makers: Governor’s office CPUC CAISO CEC & CARB» Pro‐storage policy makers: Governor s office, CPUC, CAISO, CEC & CARB

» Incentives available for customer sited applications via SGIP (~$450M) and PLS ($32M)» Incentives available for customer sited applications via SGIP ( $450M) and PLS ($32M)

» Storage key to renewable integration – new wholesale products under development (CAISO)» Storage key to renewable integration – new wholesale products under development (CAISO)

» Many CA storage projects currently underway» Many CA storage projects currently underway

CESA is driving results oriented change in all of these areasCESA is driving results‐oriented change in all of these areasConfidential21

About CESAAbout CESAOur Mission: Expand the role of storage technology to promote the growth of renewable p f g gy p g fenergy and create a cleaner, more affordable and reliable electric power systemgy , ff p y

» Core principles for a healthy market – diversity is important!Core principles for a healthy market diversity is important! Technology neutralityTechnology neutrality Ownership/business model neutrality Ownership/business model neutrality

» Explicit support of renewable energy in our mission and our membership» Explicit support of renewable energy in our mission…and our membership

» Philosophy of ‘coalition building’ with all stakeholders (especially utilities) –strength in diversityg y

W h li it d d t b f d i ff t» We have limited resources, and so must be very focused in our efforts l f l California Legislature

CPUC CAISO CEC CARBCARB FERC FERC

Confidential22

CESA: Strength Through Diversity & CollaborationCESA: Strength Through Diversity & CollaborationSteering CommitteeSteering Committee

General MembersGeneral Members

Confidential23

Role for All Storage Technologies on the GridRole for All Storage Technologies on the Grid

Technology Classes Energy Storage Examples

S di S lf B ttSodium Sulfur Battery•Electrical energy is stored for later use in chemical form Existing battery technologies are being•Electrical energy is stored for later use in chemical form. Existing battery technologies are being improved, and new battery technologies are becoming available.Chemical Storage

•Example: 34 MW Sodium Sulfur Battery — 51 MW wind farm, Japan (NGK)

Chill d W t StChilled Water Storage•Combustion turbines’ efficiency is dependent upon the temperature of the air taken into theThermal •Combustion turbines efficiency is dependent upon the temperature of the air taken into the turbine. Water chilled during off‐peak hours can greatly increase their efficiency by pre‐cooling

ThermalStorage

the air before intake.•Example: 23 700 tons of chilled water for a 1300MWWarren County Virginia CCCT•Example: 23,700 tons of chilled water for a 1300MW Warren County, Virginia CCCT

High Speed FlywheelHigh Speed Flywheel•Flywheels convert electrical energy to kinetic energy then back again very rapidly FlywheelsMechanical •Flywheels convert electrical energy to kinetic energy, then back again very rapidly. Flywheels are ideal for power conditioning and short‐term storage.

MechanicalStorage

•Example: 3 MW Mechanical Storage for Ancillary Services —NE ISO (Beacon Power)g

Below Ground Compressed AirBelow Ground Compressed Air•Electricity is used to compress air into small or large modular storage tanks or a largeBulk Mechanical •Electricity is used to compress air into small or large modular storage tanks or a large underground cavern. The compressed air is used to spin turbines when electricity is needed.

Bulk Mechanical Storage

•Example: 115 MW Compressed Air Energy Storage —McIntosh, Alabama g

Pumped HydroPumped Hydro•Excess electricity is used to pump water uphill into a reservoir When power is needed theBulk Gravitational •Excess electricity is used to pump water uphill into a reservoir. When power is needed, the water can run down through turbines, much like a traditional hydroelectric dam.

Bulk GravitationalStorage

•Example: 1,532 MW Pumped Hydro — TVA’s Raccoon Mountain

Confidential24

CESA Vision for CaliforniaCESA Vision for California Storage creates a more efficient, cleaner, smarter grid!g , , g

Current Grid Infrastructure Future Grid InfrastructureBuilt for load and generation peaks

h l f iStrategic buffers level generation and load,

d i (M ) d ithat occur only a few times peryear

reducing unevenness (Mura) andrioverburden (Muri)y

Massive fossil storage required

( )

Result: more efficient & reliable electricalsystem

Fossil Fuel

Fossil delivery infrastructure

R bl d

Base Load Generation

Renewable and Traditional Generation

Base Load Generation

Storage-OptimizedStorage-OptimizedRegulation & Transmission

Oversized Transmission Grid

Peaking & Regulation Storage-Optimizedg g p

Distribution

Oversized Distribution Grid

On-site renewables+ storage+ storage

1. The approach is similar to Heijunka in the Toyota Production System, which levels production schedules in order to reduce overall waste

Confidential25

CESA’s Top 2012 Policy PrioritiesCESA s Top 2012 Policy Priorities

ild b k d i» Build a Robust Market Foundation (CPUC)» Implement AB 2514 ‐ Comprehensive Storage Rulemaking (CPUC): appropriate procurement targets,

applications, priorities, cost‐effectiveness

» Achieve multi‐year procurement – Resource Adequacy Rulemaking y p q y g

» Behind the Meter Incentives and Value Proposition (CPUC)» Behind the Meter Incentives and Value Proposition (CPUC) I l S lf G i I i P $400M b d» Implement Self‐Generation Incentive Program ~$400M budget

» Implement Permanent Load Shifting Program ~$32M budget

» Access Ancillary Services markets (with CAISO)

» Comparable Treatment in Wholesale Markets (CAISO)» Comparable Treatment in Wholesale Markets (CAISO) » Implement Pay for Performance robust implementation of FERC Order 755» Implement Pay for Performance robust implementation of FERC Order 755

» Various Flexible Dispatch Initiatives ‐ REM, flexible dispatch, FERC Order 745 demand response

» Promote Energy Storage as a Mainstream Energy Resource (all): educate policymakers and stakeholders in all relevant proceedings, legislation: 33% RPS implementation Calif. Loading Orderp g AB32 GHG rules Flexible dispatch rules Federal ITC* FERC proceedings*

* with ESA Advocacy Council

Confidential26

AB 2514 – Landmark New Storage BillAB 2514 Landmark New Storage BillAB 2514 considers procurement targets for new storage capacityAB 2514 considers procurement targets for new storage capacity

» Considers establishing Energy Storage Procurement Targets for 2015 and 2020 (2016 and 2021 for POUs)» IF cost‐effective» IF commercially available

» Sponsored by Jerry Brown, former California Attorney General, now Governor p y y y» Authored by Assembly member Nancy Skinner, Chair, Assembly Rules Committeey y y , , y» Directs CPUC to convene a proceeding to evaluate energy storage procurement targets:» Directs CPUC to convene a proceeding to evaluate energy storage procurement targets:

Technology neutral – but must be cost‐effective Technology neutral but must be cost‐effective Application neutral key to implementation Application neutral – key to implementation Utilit o ned stomer o ned and third part o ned are eli ible Utility‐owned, customer‐owned, and third party‐owned are eligible

A li i ll d f 1/1/10 Applies to systems installed after 1/1/10 Requires CPUC to consider info from CAISO and integration of storage with other programs, including

demand side management Electrical corporations with <60k customers are exempt

» Status – signed into law 9/29/10, implementation underway at CPUC!!

AB 2514 provides necessary focus on storageAB 2514 provides necessary focus on storageConfidential27

How AB 2514 is being implementedHow AB 2514 is being implemented…The CPUC is has been very proactive in implementing the Storage BillThe CPUC is has been very proactive in implementing the Storage Bill.

March 9March 9, 2011 – 1stWorkshop

December 31 2021–

December 31, 2016 –

October 1, 2014

October 1, 2013 ‐

June 28, 2011 – 2ndW k h 31, 2021

Deadline for 2016 Deadline for

2014 ‐Deadline for

2013 ‐Deadline for

Workshop

POUs to meet 2nd

POUs to meet 1st

POUs to adopt any

CPUC to adopt anyDec 12, 2011 – Draft meet 2

procurement 1procurement

any procurement

adopt any procurement

,Staff Proposal

targets.targetsptargets.targets.

A il 3 2012April 3, 2012 – Final StaffFinal Staff Procurement Proposal

2011 2012 2014 20152013 2020 202120162011 2012 2014 20152013 2020 20212016

December 31,December 31,By March 2012, the CPUC and December 31, 2020, Deadline

December 31, 2015 ‐ Deadline

By March 2012, the CPUC and POUs must begin to consider

for IOUs to meet 2nd

for IOUs to meet 1st

energy storage procurement targets meet 2nd

procurement meet 1procurement

targets.

targetstargets

HappenedKey: Legislative Milestone

Confidential28

Status of AB 2514 Implementation Right NowStatus of AB 2514 Implementation Right Now …

1 Fi l E St F k St ff P l i d 4/3/121. Final Energy Storage Framework Staff Proposal issued 4/3/12

2 I f l ll b ti ti ith CPUC t ff d i t2. Informal collaboration meetings with CPUC staff and investor owned utilities underway y

A hi t i l /d fi iti• Achieve consensus terminology/definitions• Framework for identifying and prioritizing applications• Framework for identifying and prioritizing applications • Discuss approach to cost‐effectiveness pp

methodology/analysismethodology/analysisB i b i / li i• Brainstorm barriers/policy options

3 N t t3. Next steps: • Expect Phase 1 Proposed Decision sometime this summer• Expect Phase 1 Proposed Decision sometime this summer.

Then on to Phase 2!Then on to Phase 2!

Confidential29

Incentives Are Critical to Align Current Costs & BenefitsIncentives Are Critical to Align Current Costs & Benefits

Distributed storage has many value streams that can’t be directly g y ymonetized by the end usermonetized by the end user

I tiIncentives

Storage System CostFair Margin

T&DIncentives

T&D

O tiIncentives Overgeneration

LossesStorage Energyg

System CostEnergy

EmissionsTOU Savings TOU Savings TOU Savings Emissions

Capacity

Ancillary ServicesTotal Benefits Monitized Benefits Monitized Benefits Sytem Costs

y

TOU SavingsTotal Benefits Monitized Benefits Monitized Benefits w/Incentives

Sytem Costs TOU Savings/

Market transformational incentives for distributed storage will enableMarket transformational incentives for distributed storage will enable h i i f C lif i ’ f l lthe vision for California’s future clean energy supply

Confidential30

Self‐Generation Incentive Program HistorySelf Generation Incentive Program HistoryEvolution of the SGIPEvolution of the SGIP

AB 2778D. 01‐03‐073 D.08‐11‐044 AB 1150

Extended SGIP through 1/1/12

SGIP established to implement AB 970. Creates financial incentives for

Energy storage systems eligible only when

Clarifies intent of SGIP Forthrough 1/1/12

Limited eligibility

Creates financial incentives for distributed generation technologies that provide “energy conservation

eligible only when coupled with eligible wind or fuel cells

of SGIP For energy storage andLimited eligibility

to wind and fuel that provide energy conservation demand‐side management and other i i i i i d d d d

wind or fuel cells, including pre‐existing i d f l ll j

storage, and extends f d bcell DG

technologiesinitiatives in order to reduce demand for electricity and reduce load during

wind or fuel cell projects funding by three years technologies

peak demand periods.” (2012‐2014)

2001 2002 2006 2007 2008 2009 20102005 2011

D 02 04 004 l f dD.02‐04‐004CPUC O i i l th t

D.06‐01‐047 California Solar Initiative

SB 412 Signed Final Decision ‐SB 412CPUC Opinion reveals that

“Legislature expressed no Solar Initiative Established

Extends program through 12/16 and

SB 412 Implementation

guidance on the extent or scope of incentives for Removes all PV incentives

through 12/16 and restores CPUC th it t dd

pCPUC Final Decision p

distributed generation.” from SGIP and creates CSI program, also administered by

authority to add new technologies to

Implementing SB412 Standalone storage

the CPUC SGIP. Effective 1/1/10

Standalone storage and storage + PV is

1/1/10 eligible!

The SGIP was the ‘birth‐place’ of the CSI and is equallyThe SGIP was the birth‐place of the CSI, and is equally important for storage (storage has no other incentives)important for storage (storage has no other incentives)

Confidential31

SGIP Incentive Program – 2012SGIP Incentive Program 2012Funding StructureFunding Structure

System Size Incentive Renewable and Waste Non‐renewable Emerging TechnologiesStructure Energy Recovery Conventional CHP

• Wind Turbine • Internal Combustion • Advanced • Fuel Cell • Waste Heat to Power Engine – CHP Energy (CHP or • Pressure Reduction • Microturbine – CHP Storage Electric Turbine* • Gas Turbine – CHP • Biogas Only)

0‐1 MW 100% $1.25 $0.50 $2.00 $2.250 1 MW 100% $1.25 $0.50 $2.00 $2.25

1 2 MW 50% $0 63 $0 25 $1 00 $1 131‐2 MW 50% $0.63 $0.25 $1.00 $1.13

$ $ $ $2‐3 MW 25% $0.31 $0.13 $0.50 $0.56*Includes, but is not limited to any small turbine generator installed in an existing, man‐made channel for delivery of water, steam or natural gas.

50% of the incentive is paid upfront, 50% is a performance‐based‐incentive (PBI) paid over 5 years Systems under 30kW get all incentive payments upfront. For more program details, see:

http://energycenter.org/index.php/incentive‐programs/self‐generation‐incentive‐program

‐ AES can participate in either bucket depending on if it is standalone or coupled with renewable or non‐renewable generation! ‐ Any installation provided by a California supplier will receive an additional 20% incentive.‐ Incentives in the “Emerging Technologies” category decline at 10% per year beginning 2013.

Confidential32

SB 412 Implementation: D 11‐09‐015SB 412 Implementation: D.11 09 015Current SGIP handbook is very favorable to Energy Storage.y gy g

AES G l R i tAES General Requirements

» Maximum size: A standalone system can be no larger than the host t ’ i 12 th l k d d t th dSize Restriction: customer’s previous 12‐month annual peak demand at the proposed

site A generation‐paired system can be no larger than the generationsite. A generation paired system can be no larger than the generationsystem it is paired with.y p

» Must meet onsite load – Max. 25% export to grid

» Rated Capacity = average discharge kW over 2 hours

Discharge Capacity Criteria:

p y g g» Standalone systems must be able to discharge once per day. Discharge Capacity Criteria: » Wind‐coupled projects must be able to handle “hundreds” of partial

di h l ddischarge cycles per day.

Incentive Payment Method: » Tech Based, 50 % up front, 50 % PBI (100% up front if <30kW)I ti l l ti t f i t h l iy » Incentive calculations are separate for companion technologies

Minimum Required Round Trip Efficiency (AC t AC) 67.9%(AC to AC)

Capacity Factor (% total yearly capacityth t i i ti ) 10%the system is in operation)

Cost Cap » Applicants must pay a minimum of 40% of the eligible project cost$5 illi i i ti t j tp » $5 million maximum incentive amount per project

W t R i t» All SGIP‐eligible systems must have a minimum 10 year warranty on all

j t f th t th t li ibl f th i ti hi hWarranty Requirement major components of the system that are eligible for the incentive which covers the cost of repair or replacementcovers the cost of repair or replacement.

All systems must meet the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc interconnection standards and comply with all localAll systems must meet the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. interconnection standards and comply with all local environmental and air quality requirements.

Confidential33

Energy storage is doing well in the SGIP!AES

Energy storage is doing well in the SGIP! AES

Standalone, Remaining CCSE Funding $*P Ad i i t t (PA) A l B d t* ,

$1,003,200 Program Administrator (PA) Annual Budget*

Pacific Gas and Electric Company $33,480,000AES Plus PV, $2 055 640RemainingSouthern California Edison $26 040 000 $2,055,640 Remaining

Renewable, Southern California Edison $26,040,000

Pressure$7,729,412 California Center for Sustainable Energy $10,230,000

Pressure Reduction Southern California Gas Company $7,440,000Turbine,

$Remaining

p y $ , ,

T l $77 190 000 $1,037,500 g

Non‐Total $77,190,000

**Fuel Cell

Renewable, $5 416 484

Renewable Bucket**Each PA’s annual budget allocation is divided into two categories ‐ 75% in Renewable and Emerging Technologies; 25% in Non‐Renewable Fuel Cell,

$729,000 $5,416,484

Non‐Renewable Bucketg g g ;

Technologies. Any remaining funds in each category at the end of the year are added to their respective annual budget allocations for the followingare added to their respective annual budget allocations for the following year.

Number of CCSE SGIP Applications* CCSE kW to be Installed*Number of CCSE SGIP Applications CCSE kW to be Installed

Pressure Reduction Turbine Pressure Reduction TurbinePressure Reduction Turbine Pressure Reduction Turbine

Fuel Cell Fuel Cell

AES Pl PV AES Pl PVAES Plus PV AES Plus PV

AES Standalone AES Standalone

0 10 20 30 40 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200kWApplications kWApplications

* CCSE data as of 4/30/12

Confidential34

SGIP’s Future is Assured: AB 1150 (Perez)SGIP s Future is Assured: AB 1150 (Perez) AB 1150 authorized new funding and extend the SGIP beyond 2012AB 1150 authorized new funding and extend the SGIP beyond 2012

» Signed into law by Governor Brown September 22, 2011

$» Authorizes the extension $83M/year of rate‐payer based funding through December 31, 2014 ($249 million, total)December 31, 2014 ($249 million, total)

» Statutorily clarifies eligibility of energy storage (Section 1. 379.6 a(1)):Statutorily clarifies eligibility of energy storage (Section 1. 379.6 a(1)):

It is the intent of the Legislature that the self-generation incentive program g g p gincrease deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systemsincrease deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systems to facilitate the integration of those resources into the electrical grid improveto facilitate the integration of those resources into the electrical grid, improve efficiency and reliability of the distribution and transmission system andefficiency and reliability of the distribution and transmission system, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases peak demand and ratepayer costsreduce emissions of greenhouse gases, peak demand, and ratepayer costs.

Confidential35

$32 million program: Permanent Load Shifting (PLS)$32 million program: Permanent Load Shifting (PLS)» New category created by CPUC in 2006 recognizing that storage (particularly thermal storage) is similar to DR but» New category created by CPUC in 2006 recognizing that storage (particularly thermal storage) is similar to DR but

has different benefits, costs, markets and performance.* , , p» PLS programs reauthorized and significantly increased by IOUs and CPUC 4/19/12 to $32 million for 2012‐2014 p g g y y / / $

(rough doubling of current annual budgets). Nearly all $ are directly for incentives of $250‐$500(‐$1000?)/kW to end users investing in qualifying PLS Recognition that “not all of the benefits of PLS are accurately captured in the [current] cost‐effectiveness protocols.” New directive to IOUs to standardize PLS programs statewide; CESA will be at the center of that process over coming 2‐3

months IOUs authorized to transfer money into PLS from other programs if/as needed, but not vice versa (economic recovery,

SONGS h td d d f dditi l PLS )SONGS shutdown underscores need for additional PLS resources)PLS t d i ti t f ld d i t b d t t /i ti h h i AB» PLS category and incentives may get folded into broader storage category/incentives when comprehensive AB 2514 authorized storage rulemaking is completed2514‐authorized storage rulemaking is completed.

IOU 2012‐14 Budgetsg

P ifi G d El i $15 000 000Pacific Gas and Electric $15,000,000.

Southern California Edison $14 000 000Southern California Edison $14,000,000.

San Diego Gas & Electric $3,000,000.g , ,

Total $32,000,000.

* “…PLS involves [on a recurring basis] storing electricity produced during off peak hours and using the stored energy during peak hours to support …PLS involves [on a recurring basis] storing electricity produced during off peak hours and using the stored energy during peak hours to support loads.”

Confidential36

Lots going on at CAISO!Lots going on at CAISO!

»Regulation Energy Management – V2.1 implementation underway»Regulation Energy Management V2.1 implementation underway (Plan published 3/11/12)(Plan published 3/11/12)

»Pay for Performance (FERC Order 755 implementation) – capacity»Pay for Performance (FERC Order 755 implementation) capacity d f t t d S i 2013and performance payments expected Spring 2013

» Flexible Ramping Product – ramping procurement for 5 min RTD» Flexible Ramping Product – ramping procurement for 5 min RTD / /imbalances. Technical conference 5/29/12 / /

» Flexible Capacity Procurement Proposal introduced 1/12 will» Flexible Capacity Procurement – Proposal introduced 1/12 – will be part of 2013 RA proceeding at CPUCbe part of 2013 RA proceeding at CPUCD d R (FERC O d 745 i l t ti ) h ld»Demand Response – (FERC Order 745 implementation) ‐ on hold for now; FERC rejected CAISO tariff filing as non‐compliant; newfor now; FERC rejected CAISO tariff filing as non compliant; new

l i th kproposal in the works »DG Deliverability – Board of Governors approved new proposed»DG Deliverability – Board of Governors approved new proposed

d d li bili h d l f / /RA assessment and deliverability methodology for DG 5/16/12 y gyConfidential37

California Applications: Compensation TimelineCalifornia Applications: Compensation Timeline

Top California storage applications will become increasingly attractive p g pp g yas economic incentives and markets come onlineas economic incentives and markets come online

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Now

erMete

$2/W Incentive SGIP

the M ProgramSGIP

e of t

30% Investment Tax Credit if ESS Paired with FITC

r Side

PVFITC

omer

ESS R t il P ti i ti i CAISO A/S M k t (P D d R )WHOLESALE

Custo ESS Retail Participation in CAISO A/S Market (Proxy Demand Response)WHOLESALE

ENERGY MKT.

C

WHOLESALE ESS participation in CAISO F/R Market (2012: REM 2014: Pay for Performance) WHOLESALE F/R MKT

*R Ad

the *Resource Adequacy

contractsUtility/IPP ESS Peakers bid into CAISO Capacity MarketsWHOLESALE

CAPACTIY MKT.

e of

ter

contractsare procured on an

y Sid

Me t annual basis.

All th h l lT/D and imbalance penalties associated with 33% RPSRPS

Utility All other wholesale

markets areU markets are day ahead. ESS owners/developers sell R.A. via bi‐lateral contracts with utilitiesResource

AdequacyAdequacy

FERC creates accounting standards for storage to facilitate ratebasing

FERC Accounting FERC Accounting Standards ratebasingStandards

Confidential38

Shaping our future in CaliforniaShaping our future in California….

California’s regulatory framework is rapidly evolving to accelerate g y p y gdeployment of grid storagedeployment of grid storage

» CAISO Flexibility Implementation REM Flexible Ramping Flexible Capacity» CAISO Flexibility Implementation, REM, Flexible Ramping, Flexible Capacity

» CAISO Pay for Performance Implementation regulation (FERC Order 755) y p g ( )

CPUC St R l ki t t AB 2514» CPUC Storage Rulemaking pursuant to AB 2514

» CPUC Long Term Procurement Planning (LTPP) Renewable Integration» CPUC Long Term Procurement Planning (LTPP), Renewable Integration

» CPUC Resource Adequacy (RA)

» CPUC Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)» CPUC Self‐Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)

» CPUC Standard Offer for Permanent Load Shifting (PLS)g ( )

CPUC S t G id D l t» CPUC Smart Grid Deployment

» CPUC General Rate Cases – Storage friendly tariffs» CPUC General Rate Cases Storage friendly tariffs

» CEC Integrated Energy Policy Report – includes storage

Be the master of your own destiny, get involved! y y g

Confidential39

Questions?Questions?

Janice LinJanice LinCo Founder & Executive Director

O 510 665 78112150 Allston Way Suite 210

O 510 665 7811M 415 595 83012150 Allston Way, Suite 210

Berkeley, CA 94704M 415 595 8301 F 888 453 0018Berkeley, CA 94704

lwww.strategen.com [email protected]

For more information about CESA membership, public filings, and p p gother energy storage educational documents please visit us online at:other energy storage educational documents, please visit us online at:

www.storagealliance.orgg g

Confidential40





kImre GyukImre GyukU S D t t f EU.S. Department of Energyp gy

E S R h P MEnergy Storage Research Program Managergy g g g


P iProgress inProgress inG id E StGrid Energy StorageGrid Energy Storage

IMRE GYUK PROGRAM MANAGERIMRE GYUK, PROGRAM MANAGERENERGY STORAGE RESEARCH, DOEENERGY STORAGE RESEARCH, DOE

Si-Valley 05– 30-12

E St id EEnergy Storage provides EnergyEnergy Storage provides Energy

h it i d dwhen it is neededwhen it is needed

j t T i i id Ejust as Transmission provides Energyjust as Transmission provides Energy

h it i d dwhere it is neededwhere it is needed

Renewables (not capacity factor adjusted)9

Renewables (not capacity factor adjusted)

8

7

66

W

Wi d

M

Wind

5og

Wind (proj)5Lo Solar PV

Solar PV (proj)

4 Hydro4Hydro (proj)y (p j)

World Consumption

3World Consumption

31990 2000 2010 2020 2030 20401990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040

Y G G k 2011Year G. Gyuk 2011

29 U S States have Renewable29 U.S. States have Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)Portfolio Standards (RPS)( )Requiring 10 40% RenewablesRequiring 10-40% Renewablesg

O P k Wi dOn Peak WindOn Peak Windth R lit !- the Reality!the Reality!

Cost effective Energy Storage yields better Asset UtilizationCost effective Energy Storage yields better Asset Utilization

Some Large Energy Storage Projects:Some Large Energy Storage Projects:

27MW / 7MWh 1995 Fairbanks, AL,34MW / 245MWh 2008 Rokkasho Japan34MW / 245MWh 2008 Rokkasho. Japan20MW / 5MWh 2011 Stephentown, NYp ,32MW / 8MWh 2011 Laurel Mountain WV32MW / 8MWh 2011 Laurel Mountain, WV14MW / 63 MWh 2011 Hebei, China,8MW / 32MWh 2012 Tehachapi CA8MW / 32MWh 2012 Tehachapi, CA25MW / 75MWh 2013 Modesto, CA,

Annual new DeploymentWorldwide CNESA Annual new DeploymentWorldwide – CNESA p y2011 May 370MW

2011 : 121MW2011 May 370MW2011 Aug 455MW 2011 : 121MW 2011 Aug. 455MW2011 N 545MW → 2021 : 2 353MW2011 Nov. 545MW2012 F b 580MW → 2021 : 2,353MW2012 Feb. 580MW

(Pike Research)2012 Apr. 590MW ( )

ARRA Sti l F di f StARRA Stimulus Funding for StorageARRA Stimulus Funding for Storage$Demonstration Projects ($185M)Demonstration Projects ($185M)

A ten fold Increase in Power Scale!A ten-fold Increase in Power Scale!

Large Battery System (3 projects 53MW)Large Battery System (3 projects,53MW)Compressed Air (2 projects 450MW)Compressed Air (2 projects, 450MW)p ( p j )

Frequency Regulation (20MW)Frequency Regulation (20MW)q y g ( )Di t ib t d P j t (5 j t 9MW)Distributed Projects (5 projects,9MW)Distributed Projects (5 projects,9MW)Technology Development (5 projects)Technology Development (5 projects)

533MW $585M Costshare!533MW - $585M Costshare!

L B tt i f Wi d I t tiLarge Batteries for Wind IntegrationLarge Batteries for Wind Integration

Feb 24 2007: 500MW / 2 5hr; 30x SpotpricesCoincident BPA Wind Ramps Feb. 24, 2007: 500MW / 2.5hr; 30x SpotpricesNREL: ∆ = 25% @ 2days ∆ = 50% @ 1 week

Coincident BPA Wind RampsNREL: ∆ = 25% @ 2days, ∆ = 50% @ 1 week

3 Large Battery + Wind Projects =3 Large Battery + Wind Projects = 53MW in Stimulus Package!53MW in Stimulus Package!g

ARRA Primus PowerARRA – Primus Power

Installing a 25 MW / 3hr battery plant for theInstalling a 25 MW / 3hr battery plant for the Modesto Irrigation District in CA providingModesto Irrigation District in CA, providing equivalent flex capacity to 50 MW of natural gasequivalent flex capacity to 50 MW of natural gas

i ti $73Mengines costing $73M

4MW/12MWh incremental “Plug & gPlay” deploymenty y

High powerHigh power metal electrodes

Fully self-contained, hermetically 250kW/750kWh y , ysealed flow battery modules EnergyPods™ y gy

ARRA S h C lif i Edi / A123 Li IARRA - Southern California Edison / A123 – Li-Ion:8 MW / 4 hr battery plant for wind integration at Tehachapi, CA.y p g p ,

8MW Storage Plant under Constructiong

A Tehachapi Wind Fieldp

ARRA D k E / Xt PARRA – Duke Energy / Xtreme Powergy

36MW / 40 min battery plant36MW / 40 min battery plant

Ramp control wind smoothingRamp control, wind smoothingg

Linked to 153MWLinked to 153MWWind farmWind farmat No Trees TXat No-Trees, TX

Xt P K h k Wi d P j tXtreme Power Kahuku Wind ProjectXtreme Power, Kahuku Wind ProjectLargest North American Installation with Windg

L ti O h HILocation Oahu, HI

Application WindApplication Wind

DPR™ 15 MW / 10 MWhDPR™ 15 MW / 10 MWh

COD Q1 2011COD Q1 2011

S CServices Ramp Control, Voltage Regulation

This DPR™ will operate on a 30 MW wind farm on the island of OahuThis DPR will operate on a 30 MW wind farm on the island of Oahu to meet PPA ramp control and smoothing requirementsto meet PPA ramp control and smoothing requirements.

G id F R l tiGrid Frequency RegulationGrid Frequency Regulationwith Fast Storage: 1 project 20MWwith Fast Storage: 1 project 20MWg p j

Kirby 2004Kirby 2004

Current method to balance constantly shifting load fluctuation isCurrent method to balance constantly shifting load fluctuation is to vary the frequency and periodically adjust generation in responseto vary the frequency and periodically adjust generation in response to an ISO signal Fast storage can respond instantaneously!to an ISO signal. Fast storage can respond instantaneously!

)Key Outcomes (PNNL Study 2012)Key Outcomes (PNNL Study, 2012)When additional renewables are planned a certain amount of storage or fastWhen additional renewables are planned, a certain amount of storage or fast-ramping generation is also needed to firm the variable renewable powerramping generation is also needed to firm the variable renewable power. – For every unit of wind capacity power, approximately 0.08 to 0.15 units of y p y p pp y

intra-hour balancing (minute-to-minute variability) need to be added.g ( y)

Intra hour balancing power requirements caused by wind variability onlyIntra-hour balancing power requirements caused by wind variability onlyfMW as a percentage of as a percentage of

as a percentage of storage

as a percentage of as a percentage of installed windstorage

average demand peak demand installed wind

capacitycapacity

AZ NMAZ-NM-SNV

174.08 1.0 0.5 12.8SNV

7 .08 .0 0.5 .8

CA-MX 943.65 2.5 1.4 14.4

NWPP 1 071 26 2 1 1 5 11 0NWPP 1,071.26 2.1 1.5 11.0

RMPA 504 89 5 6 3 6 8 0RMPA 504.89 5.6 3.6 8.0

FREQUENCY REGULATIONFREQUENCY REGULATIONFREQUENCY REGULATIONDOE Loan Guarantee – Beacon:20MW Flywheel Storage for20MW Flywheel Storage for Frequency Regulation in NY-ISOFrequency Regulation in NY ISO20MW commissioned July 201120MW commissioned July 2011

DOE Loan Guarantee AES / A123:DOE Loan Guarantee – AES / A123:20MW Lithi I B tt f20MW Lithium Ion Battery for Frequency Regulation in NY-ISO8MW on Line!

AES Laurel Mountain WV 32 MW StorageAES, Laurel Mountain, WV - 32 MW Storage less than 1 acre no emissionsless than 1 acre, no emissions

Integrated with 98MW Wind FarmIntegrated with 98MW Wind Farm

57

Compressed Air Energy StorageCompressed Air Energy Storage 2 CAES Projects2 CAES Projectsj

Inexpensive Off-Peak Power to Compress AirInexpensive Off-Peak Power to Compress Air for Storage in Aq ifers Salt Domes Ca ernsfor Storage in Aquifers, Salt Domes, Caverns, or abandoned Gas Wells. On-Peak, Compressed Air is used as Input for GasCompressed Air is used as Input for Gas Turbine Compressor increasing EfficiencyTurbine Compressor, increasing Efficiency

Huntdorf, Germany, 1978, 290 MWMcIntosh, Alabama, 1991, 110 MW Huntdorf, Germany, 1978, 290 MWMcIntosh, Alabama, 1991, 110 MW

ARRA – PG&E:ARRA PG&E:

300 MW / 10hr Compressed Air Depleted Gas WellspEnergy Storage Facility in

p

G Pi LiEnergy Storage Facility inTehachapi CA Gas Pipe LineTehachapi, CA

E i ti 500kV T i i LiExisting 500kV Transmission Line

4 500 MW New Wind in 4 5 Years4 500 MW New Wind in 4-5 Years

Location of Wind Resources Location of Depleted Gas Fields

U ltrabattery A nd VR LA B attery 1C 1 C apacityA fter H R PSoC C yclingARRA P bli S i NM A fter H R PSoC C ycling.

110ARRA – Public Service NM:100

U ltraB atte ry V R LA (A fte r Cycling a t 1C, 2C , & 4C R ate )

500kW 2 5MWh for smoothing of 90

Capa

city

500kW, 2.5MWh for smoothing of 500kW PV installation; Using 80

Of I

nitia

l C500kW PV installation; Using E tP L d C b T h l 70%

AG M V RLA (A fte r C ycling at 1C R ate)

EastPenn Lead-Carbon Technology50

60 AG M V RLA (A fte r C ycling a t 1C R ate)

500 2,000 4 ,000 6 ,000 8 ,000 10 ,000 12 ,000 14,000 16 ,000 18 ,000 20 ,000

H R PS o C C ycle Num ber

PbC Testing at SandiaPbC Testing at Sandia

ARRA EastPenn PA:ARRA – EastPenn, PA:3MW Frequency Reg for PJMq y g1MW 1-4hrs Load Management1MW 1 4hrs Load Management during Peak Periodsduring Peak Periods

Commissioned Sep. 24, 2011

Integrator: EcoultIntegrator: Ecoult

Commissioning June 2012Commissioning June 2012

D t it Edi ARRA C itDetroit Edison, ARRA Community , yE St P j tEnergy Storage Projectgy g j

20 Units20 Units each 25kW / 2hreach 25kW / 2hrCoupled with 500kW PVCoupled with 500kW PV

d 500kW / 30 i Stand 500kW / 30min Storageg

M i C tMonrovia County Community College

Dow Kokam Battery S&C InverterDow Kokam Battery S&C Inverter

ARRA Enervault:ARRA - Enervault:250kW/4hr Fe-Cr Flow Battery for PVy

PV: 300 kWStorage: 250 KWStorage: 250 KWPeak output: 450kWPeak output: 450kWStorage Cost: +16%Storage Cost: +16% Storage Value: +84%Storage Value: +84%

Tracking PV in Almond Grove

Fl B tt P t t L i PV ith StFlow Battery Prototype Leveraging PV with Storage

ARRA DistributedProject:ARRA DistributedProject:

Installation of 5 Transflow 2000 500kWInstallation of 5 Transflow 2000 500kW Z B B tt S t t l ti ithiZnBr Battery Systems at locations within y ySMUD and National Grid Utility Districts:SMUD and National Grid Utility Districts:

2 it t b t ti i S• 2 units at a substation in SyracuseS• 1 unit at Syracuse University

• 1 unit at SMUD HQ microgrid• 1 unit at SMUD Solar Smart Homes Projectj

ARRA A i EARRA - Aquion Energy: Winner, 2010q gyAqueous Sodium Ion Battery

,World Technology AwardAqueous Sodium Ion Battery World Technology Award

• Cost Goal: <$200/kWh• Lifetime cost: <$0.10/kWhLifetime cost: $0.10/kWh• Ubiquitous low cost precursorsUbiquitous, low cost precursors• Inexpensive manufacture• Inexpensive manufacture• Roundtrip Efficiency >85%• Roundtrip Efficiency >85%

5000 c cles demonstrated• 5000 cycles demonstrated

120

100y) 100

Charge Capacityacity

80 Charge CapacityDischarge Capacityity

C

apa

60g p y

pac

ial C

40Cap

init

20% o

f

20(%

00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Cycle #

ARRA S t i XARRA - SustainX: Awards: GE Ecomagination, Totally green Isothermal CAES

g ,Clean Tech 100 in 2010 / 11Totally green Isothermal CAES Clean Tech 100 in 2010 / 11

A site-anywhere solution – eliminatesA site anywhere solution eliminates lengthy siting and risk associated withlengthy siting and risk associated with geologic storagegeologic storage

Superior thermodynamics – eliminates reliance on natural gas

Isothermal efficiency of 95% comparedIsothermal efficiency of 95% compared with 54% for adiabatic techniquewith 54% for adiabatic technique

Higher pressure and efficiency make pipe-typeHigher pressure and efficiency make pipe type storage cost effectivestorage cost effective

A patented and demonstrated low cost longA patented and demonstrated, low-cost, long lif ti t l tilifetime energy storage solution

Energy Storage Project Database Clickable States toEnergy Storage Project Database Clickable States to display more detailed

information

A publicly accessible database of energy storage projects world-wide,

Rollover Pop out

as well as state and federal Pop-out

boxes with legislation/policiessummaries

of State dataof State data

h // h /http://www.energystorageexchange.org/.

M k d tiMarkers denoting projects and points p j p

of interestDOE/EPRI Energy Storage HandbookDOE/EPRI Energy Storage HandbookPartnership with EPRI and NRECA to develop a definitive energy storage handbook:Partnership with EPRI and NRECA to develop a definitive energy storage handbook:• Details the current state of commercially available energy storage technologies• Details the current state of commercially available energy storage technologies.• Matches applications to technologiesMatches applications to technologies• Info on sizing siting interconnectingInfo on sizing, siting, interconnecting• Includes a cost databaseIncludes a cost database

ES-Select: Energy Storage Selection ToolES-Select: Energy Storage Selection Tool

• A tool for high-level decision makers to facilitate planning for ESS infrastructure:

Hi h l l t h i l d i• High-level technical and economic i f t t h l ireview of storage technologies

D t i d i li bl• Determine and size applicable energy storage resourcesstorage resources

• Develop a preliminary business case• Develop a preliminary business case• Educate potential owners electric system• Educate potential owners, electric system

stakeholders and the general public onstakeholders and the general public on energy storage technologiesenergy storage technologies

• Developed by KEMA• Developed by KEMA• http://www sandia gov/ess/esselect htmlhttp://www.sandia.gov/ess/esselect.html

Storage Guidebook for Regulatory OfficialsStorage Guidebook for Regulatory OfficialsI f l t b t St b fit• Inform regulators about Storage benefits P id i f ti t h i l t f E St S t• Provide information on technical aspects of Energy Storage SystemsId tif l t h ll t i d St S t d l t• Identify regulatory challenges to increased Storage System deploymentSuggest possible responses/solutions to challenges• Suggest possible responses/solutions to challenges

• Develop model PUC submissions requesting approval of rate base addition• Develop model PUC submissions requesting approval of rate base addition • Advisory Committee comprised of industry and government experts• Advisory Committee comprised of industry and government experts

Development of a Protocol to Measure and Report p pPerformance of Energy Storage technologyPerformance of Energy Storage technology• We need a common language for technology providers and prospective users• No uniform acceptable criteria exist for comparable statements of performance• This causes confusion in the market and adversely affects technology acceptance• DOE is leading an effort to develop an initial protocol (pre-standard)

• Formation of representative stakeholder group• Clarification of anticipated application and use of the protocol by industry

D l d d i h bl• Develop a pre-standard with reasonable consensusO i t t h l l• Ongoing support as technology evolves

Collaboration with Clean Energy States AllianceCollaboration with Clean Energy States Alliance• Webinar Series on Policy Issues related to Energy Storage• Webinar Series on Policy Issues related to Energy Storage• Provide information on technical aspects of Energy Storage Systems• Provide information on technical aspects of Energy Storage Systems• Identify regulatory challenges to increased Storage System deployment• Identify regulatory challenges to increased Storage System deployment• Suggest possible responses/solutions to challengesSuggest possible responses/solutions to challenges• Develop model PUC submissions requesting approval of rate base additionDevelop model PUC submissions requesting approval of rate base addition • Advisory Committee comprised of industry and government expertsAdvisory Committee comprised of industry and government experts

SNL E St S t A l i L b tSNL Energy Storage System Analysis Laboratorygy g y y yR li bl i d d t thi d t t ti d ifi ti fReliable, independent, third party testing and verification of

advanced energy technologies from cell to MW scale systemsExpertise to design test plans for technologies and their potential applicationsExpertise to design test plans for technologies and their potential applications

Cell, Battery and Module TestingCell, Battery and Module Testing• Testers to accommodate a wide range ofTesters to accommodate a wide range of

testing applications including:– 14 channels from 36 V, 25 A to 72 V,

1000 A for battery to module-scale tests– Over 125 channels; 0 V to 10 V, 3 A to

100+ A for cell tests Energy Storage Test Pad (ESTP)100+ A for cell tests

S t T tiSystem TestingS f C• Scalable from 5 KW to 1 MW, 480 VAC, 3 phase1 MW/1 MVAR l d b k f ith ll l• 1 MW/1 MVAR load bank for either parallel microgrid or series UPS operationsmicrogrid, or series UPS operations

• Subcycle metering in feeder breakers for system Subcyc e e e g eede b ea e s o sys eidentification and transient analysis

• Can test for both power and energy use cases

72 V 1000 A Bitrode (2 Parallel Channels)

David RoseSummer [email protected]@sandia.gov

DOE Energy Storage ProgramDOE Energy Storage Programgy g g

Aggressively FurthersAggressively Furthers

Market Pull and Technology Push:Market Pull and Technology Push:

Demonstrations and ResearchDemonstrations and Research





PANEL DISCUSSIONPANEL DISCUSSION:PANEL DISCUSSION:Enterprise Level StorageEnterprise‐Level Storagep g

Jeff Byron, NRG Energyy , gyi i lGiovanni Damato, Strategen Consulting LLC, g g

M M i Al d CMatt Muniz, Alameda County, yK th M S EKenneth Munson, Sunverge Energyg gyE G ld ( d t ) P i I t ti lEvan Goldman (moderator), Prescience International






i i h l lCommissioner Cheryl A LaFleurCommissioner Cheryl A. LaFleurF d l E R l t C i i (FERC)Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)gy g y ( )






Documents

SiliSilicon Valleyll Storageg Symposiumyp · Supporting the Energy Storage Industry Bringing Technical Market and Policy Bringing Technical, Market, and Policy matt i t ti ith btters