SHRM Unit 2-2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    1/25

    MBAIV SEM

    Strategic Human Resource

    Management

    Manav

    RachnaCollegeofEngg.

    Presentation by Tanushree Gulati

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    2/25

    Unit 2 Syllabus

    Strategic Fit Frameworks

    Linking Business Strategy and HR Strategy

    HR Bundles Approach

    Best Practice Approach Business Strategy and Human Resource Planning

    HRM and Firm Performance Linkages-measures of

    performance linkages

    Sustained competitive advantages throughinimitable HR Practices

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    3/25

    Strategic Fit Frameworks

    Strategic Fit refers to the strategic integration of HRactivities with business strategies

    Guest in 1997, identified the following 5 Fits:

    Best Fit Approach

    Fit as Contingency

    Fit as an ideal set of practices (Best PracticeApproach)- best practices which all firms can

    adopt Fit as Gestalt

    Fit as Bundles(the configuration approach)

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    4/25

    FitPerspectiv

    e

    Fit as anideal set

    ofpractices

    Fit asgestalt

    Fit asbundles

    configuration approach)

    Fit asContinge

    ncy

    Fit as astrategicinteractio

    n

    TYPES OF FIT BETWEEN HR & BUSINESS

    STRATEGY

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    5/25

    Best Fit Approach-

    HR practices linkages

    withthe external context

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    6/25

    Types of Business

    Strategy

    Characteristics Examples

    Cost leadership The firm increases its efficiency , cuts costs so thatproducts or services may be priced lower than the industry

    average.

    Assumes that a small change in price will significantlyaffect customer demand

    Assumes that the customers show greater price sensitivity

    than brand loyalty- this is because the products / services of

    each firm are non- distinguishable.

    Retailers such as

    Vishal Mega Mart

    Differentiation The firm distinguishes its products/ services fromits competitors or at least attempts to make

    consumers perceive that there are differences .

    The firm charges a premium for its products/

    services because it offers its customers something

    that is unique , extraordinary, or innovative.

    The firm seeks to develop brand loyalty

    Nike, Sony

    Focus

    The firm recognizes that different segments of the markethave different needs and attempts to satisfy one particular

    group.

    The firm can charge a premium for its services since the

    market has overlooked these market segments.

    Clothes manufacturesthat cater to petite

    women, restaurants

    that target only

    families.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    7/25

    HR PRACTICES CORRESPONDING TO STAGES OF LIFE CYCLE OF ORGANISATION

    Life cycle

    stages

    HR Practices

    Start up Flexible patterns of work

    Competitive payLittle formality

    No unions

    Recruitment of highly motivated and committed employees

    Growth More sophisticated recruitment and selection

    Training and development

    Reward systemsFocus on high commitment

    Developing stable high commitment

    Performance management processes

    Maturity Attention to the control of labor process

    Focus on increasing productivityStrained employee relations

    Control compensation

    Decline Emphasis on rationalization of workforce and downsizing

    Abandoning some longstanding practices to cut costs

    Trade unions have some marginalized roles

    Retraining and career consulting services

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    8/25

    Business Strategy HR Strategy

    Cost Leadership

    Suitable for repetitive and

    predictable behavior

    Concerned with short term focus

    and qualities (volumes)

    Result oriented

    Utilization HR StrategyHR strategy focused on short term

    performance measures ,i.e, results or

    outcomes.Efficiency is the norm, job assignments are

    specialized, explicit job descriptions.

    Hierarchical pay, few incentives

    Narrow career paths, limited training

    limited employment security

    Limited participationCost cutting involve incentives for

    employees to leave the organisation.

    Differentiationlong term focus

    Creative job behaviorModerate concern for quality and

    quantity

    Facilitation HR StrategyBroad career paths

    Extensive trainingLong term performance measures

    High employees participation

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    9/25

    Business strategy HR Strategy

    Some employees security

    Equal and fair pay, manyincentives for creativity.

    External recruitment and hiring

    of people who bring in new ideas

    Focus High concern for quality

    Moderate concern for quantity

    Long / Medium term focus

    Accumulation HR StrategyEqual and fair pay with many

    incentives

    Hiring employees belonging to the

    target market

    Broad career paths with extensive

    trainingHigh employees participation

    Some employees security

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    10/25

    Miles & Snows classification of business strategy and HR strategy

    DOMINANT CULTURE OF THE

    ORGANIZATIONHR STRATEGY

    Defenders

    Find change threatening

    Favor strategies which encourage

    continuity and security

    Bureaucratic approach

    Planned & regularly maintained policies tp provide

    for lean HrBuild human resources

    Likely to emphasize training programmers and

    internal promotion.

    Prospectors

    Thrive on change

    Favor strategies of product andor/ market development

    Creative and flexible management style

    Have high quality human resource

    Emphasis redevelopment & flexibility of HRLittle opportunity for long term HR planning

    Acquire human resources

    Likely to emphasis on recruitment , selection and

    performance- based compensation

    Analyses

    Seek to match new ventures with thepresent business set up

    These firms are followers- the

    ventures are not to the market, only

    new to the firm

    Low levels of monitoring and coordination

    Buy as well as make key human resourcesEmphasize HR planning

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    11/25

    Fit as Contingency, Fit as Gestalt

    Fit as Contingency -HR approaches to ensure that

    internal practices of organization respond to externalfactors such as:

    Nature of market,

    Skills availability, Nature of competition

    Federal and Union Laws

    Market and Environment Analysis etc.

    Fit asGestalt- emphasizes on the importance of finding anappropriate combination of practices

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    12/25

    Fit as Bundles

    Bundling refers to the development and implementation of

    several HR practices together so that they are interrelated andinternally consistent.

    Each HR practice complements and reinforces the other.

    Mac Duffie (1995) referred to bundling as

    complementarities and Delery, Doty (1996) called it theadoption of configurational mode.

    Bundles approach is also known as internal fit or

    horizontal integration.

    Fit as Bundles(the configuration approach)- suggests a

    search for distinct configuration or bundles of HR practices

    that compliment each other, in order to determine which

    bundle is likely to be most effective.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    13/25

    Best Practice Approach

    Fit as an ideal set of practices (Best Practice Approach)-

    best practices which all firms can adopt

    Pfeffers (1994) list of 16 practices, later summarized into 7,has been the most significant influence on the definitions ofbest practice.

    Employment Security

    Selective Hiring

    Team working

    High pay contingent on company performance

    Extensive Training Reduction of Status Differences

    Information Sharing

    HRM and firm performance linkages-measures of HRM performance

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    14/25

    HRM and Firm Performance Linkages

    Huselid 1995, Delery & Doty 1996, Huselid &

    Delaney 1996, Boselie, Paauwe & Jansen 2001,

    Datta, Guthrie & Wright, 2005, Tzafrir 2005, Guest,

    et al. 2008 have established a linkage between

    human resource management practices and firmperformance

    The understanding of the interconnectivity of

    various areas within HRM and the actual

    performance of the organization in whole, ordepartmentally has yet to be thoroughly studied.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    15/25

    Performances may be measured through assessing

    each individuals characteristic contributions to the

    organization.

    Huselid and Delaney (1996) contended HRM

    practices, particularly selection and training, are

    associated with perceived firm performance in profit

    and nonprofit organisations.

    Youndt, Snell, Dean and Lepak (1996) have

    examined the impact of HRM strategy on firmperformance of 512 manufacturing plants and found

    a moderate relationship between HR system and

    plant performance.

    HRM and Firm Performance Linkages -

    measures of performance linkages

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    16/25

    Wright, Snell, and Dyer (2005) asserted that firm

    competitiveness can be enhanced by a high

    performance work system, and that it has a positive

    relationship with organisational effectiveness.

    Similar results are reported by Gooderham,

    Ringdal, and Parry (2006) who found a positive

    impact of HRM practices on firm performance of

    3,281 firms in Europe.

    HRM and Firm Performance Linkages -

    measures of performance linkages

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    17/25

    HRM and Firm Performance Linkages -

    measures of performance linkages

    HR Performance and Benchmarking

    Benchmarking

    Comparing specific measures of performance against

    data on those measures in other best practice

    organizations

    Common Benchmarks

    Total compensation as a percentage of net income

    before taxes

    Percent of management positions filled internally Sales per employee

    Benefits as a percentage of payroll cost

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    18/25

    Doing the Benchmarking Analysis

    Return on Investment (ROI)

    Calculation showing the value of expenditures for HR

    activities.

    A = Operating costs for a new or enhance system for the time period

    B = One-time cost and implementation

    C = Value of gains from productivity improvements for the time period

    BA

    CROI

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    19/25

    HR Business Performance Calculations

    Figure 2

    11aSource: Adapted from Jac Fitz-Enz, Top 10 Calculations for Your HRIS, HR Focus, April 1998, S-3.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    20/25

    HR Business Performance Calculations

    Source: Adapted from Jac Fitz-Enz, Top 10 Calculations for Your HRIS, HR Focus, April 1998, S-3.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    21/25

    Sustained competitive advantages

    A firm is said to have a sustained competitive

    advantage when it is implementing a value creating

    strategy not simultaneously being implemented by

    any current or potential competitors and when

    these other firms are unable to duplicate thebenefits of this strategy

    Day and Wensley (1988) focused on two

    categorical sources involved in creating acompetitive advantage : superior skills and superior

    resources.

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    22/25

    Sustained competitive advantages through

    inimitable HR Practices

    Superior Skills and Superior Resources (Human)

    An organizations competitive advantage in itsbusiness environment is vital to understand forreasons of strategic planning, and the HRM systemplays an important role in interpreting theorganizations position.

    In understanding this element of strategic planningfor the organization, it is essential for the leadership

    to first understand the firms performance levels,and how to use HRM as a tool to make tacticalmaneuvers within the organization in order to attainthe results needed to meet performance level goals(Wright, 1998).

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    23/25

    For example, a strategy of innovation should foster

    adoption of HRM practices that share a focus on

    innovation; a strategy of customer service should

    be linked to a set of practices that center around

    service (Bowen, 2004).

    Sustained competitive advantages through

    inimitable HR Practices

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    24/25

  • 7/29/2019 SHRM Unit 2-2011

    25/25

    QUESTIONS ANSWERS