Upload
milton-norris
View
216
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Design Basis Accidents (DBA)
M. T. Porfiri – ENEA UTFUS-TECN (Frascati)
Seminar – Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants
La Sapienza University Rome – 24 April 2015
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Outline
Safety Analysis “Course”: Deterministic Assessment
DBA: definition
General Safety Objectives: ITER case
Project Environmental Release Guidelines: ITER case
DBAs: ITER case
Release fraction in incidents: ITER case
Release fraction in accidents: ITER case
Example: LOCA in Divertor cooling loop
2/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Glossary
ACP Activated Corrosion ProductsDBA Design Basis AccidentDCF Dose Conversion FactorDV DivertorEPR European Pressurized ReactorEST Environmental Source TermFW First WallFMEA Failure Mode and Effects AnalysisISS Isotope Separation SystemITER International Tokamak Experimental ReactorHTS Heat Transfer SystemHX Heat ExchangeLOOP Loss Of Offsite PowerPFC Plasma Facing ComponentPIE Postulated Initiating EventPST Process Source TermTF Toroidal FieldVV Vacuum Vessel
3/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
(Courtesy of S. Ciattaglia)
Safety Analysis “Course”: Deterministic Assessment
4/15
SOURCE
TERMS ASSESSMENT
Normal working conditions Occupational dose
IEAS
Thermodynamic transients Aerosols and H3 transport
Containments Release from the plant DCF
Overall Plant AnalysisFFMEA
Radioactive waste Operational&Decomm wasteIdentification&classification
Management•On-site•Recycling•Final disosal
Effluents
PST
PST EST
DCF
man*Sv/y
dose/sequence to MEI
frequency*dose
Quantity and waste categories
mSv/y
SOURCE
TERMS
Normal working conditions Occupational dose
PIE Thermodynamic transients
Aerosols and H3 transport
Confinements Release from the plant DCF
Overall Plant Safety AnalysisFMEA
Radioactive waste Operational&Decomm waste
Identification&classification
Management• On site• Recycling• Final disposal
Effluents
PST
PST EST
DCF
person*Sv/y
dose/sequence to Public
frequency*dose
Quantity and waste categories
mSv/y
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
DBA: definition
A Design Basis Accident is a postulated accident that a nuclear facility must be designed and built to withstand without loss to the systems, structures, and components necessary to ensure public health and safety [NRC].
They are classified as incidents and
accidents, according to the frequency of occurrency.
The methodologies to be used for the DBAs analysis must be conservative. That means they use pessimistic or worst-case assumptions and models. Most of the analyses presented to regulatory bodies follow this approach.
5/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
ITER case
6/15
Central Solenoid
Outer Intercoil Structure
Toroidal Field Coils
Poloidal Field Coils
Machine GravitySupports
Blanket Modules
Vacuum Vessel
Cryostat
Port Plug (Radiofrequency Heating)
Divertor
TorusCryopump
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
General Safety Objectives: ITER caseGeneral safety objectives
For personnel For the public and environment
Situations in design basis
Normalsituations
ALARA, and in any case less than:Maximum individual dose
≤ 10 mSv/yrAverage individual dose
≤ 2.5 mSv/yrCollective annual dose ≤ 500 mSv*p/yr
Releases less than the limits authorised for the installation,Impact as low as reasonably achievable and in any case less than:
≤ 0.1 mSv/yr
Incidental situations
As low as reasonably achievable and in any case less than:
10 mSv per incident
Release per incident less than the annual limits authorised for the installation.
[i.e. 0.1 mSv per incident]
Accidental situations
Take into account the constraints related to the management of the accident and post-accident situation
No immediate or deferred counter-measures (confinement, evacuation)
< 10 mSvNo restriction of consumption of animal or vegetable products
Situations beyond design basis
Hypothetical accidents
No cliff-edge effect; possible counter-measures limited in time and space
7/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Project Environmental Release Guidelines: ITER case
8/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
DBAs: ITER case (1)
9/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
DBAs: ITER case (2)
10/15
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Release fraction in incidents: ITER case
11/15
Margins against Project Environmental Release Guidelines for Reference Events.
Sum of Tritium, Activated Dust and Activation Corrosion Product Releases
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Release fraction in accidents: ITER case
12/15
Margins against Project Environmental Release Guidelines for Reference Events.
Sum of Tritium, Activated Dust and Activation Corrosion Product Releases
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Example: LOCA in Divertor cooling loop (1)
13/15
- The accident postulated is a double ended pipe rupture in a large diameter pipe, at the pump inlet of the DV (divertor)/LIM (limiter) primary coolant loop.
- The coolant leak pressurises the vault. - The Fusion Power Shutdown System
(FPSS) will stop plasma burn in three seconds .
- This results in a plasma disruption that delivers 0.4 GJ of energy to the DV.
- The high stress conditions of the divertor plates are postulated to result in an in-vessel leak for a break on the DV/LIM HTS loop.
- The DV/LIM HTS coolant in-leakage pressurises the VV and, when VV pressure exceeds 110 kPa, the bleed lines to VVPSS and to drain tank open.
- In the mean time, the vault is pressurised and a high vault atmosphere pressure signal (the set point is at 105 kPa) triggers the isolation of the vault.
- When the VV pressure exceeds 150 kPa the rupture disks open towards the Vacuum Vessel Suppression System.
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015
Example: LOCA in Divertor cooling loop (2)
14/15
0.E+0
1.E+5
2.E+5
1 100 10000
time [s]
Pres
sure
[Pa
]
VVTCWS
Post accident Hydrogen production
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 100 200 300
time [s]
Mas
s [k
g]
The chemical reactions between the steam and the PFC protective materials produce an amount of H2 far from the explosion risk (4kg).
Seminar: Safety in Nuclear Fusion Plants - La Sapienza University (Rome) – 24 April 2015 15/15
Mobilised Inventory Release path, transport of inventory
Releaseamount
Totalrelease
Tritium TCWS vault >> environment (before vault isolation)
4.1*10-7g-T Tritium:controlled release 4.1*10-7 g-Tuncontrolled 6.5*10-2 g-Ttotal release 6.5*10-2 g-T Dust:uncontrolled 1.7*10-2 gtotal release 1.7*10-2 g ACP:controlled release 1.7*10-7 guncontrolled 0.27 gtotal release 0.27 g
TCWS vault >> environment (after vault isolation)
6.5*10-2 g-T
Dust TCWS vault >> environment (before vault isolation)
No release
TCWS vault >> environment (after vault isolation)
17 mg
ACP TCWS vault >> environment (before vault isolation)
1.7 *10-7 g
TCWS vault >> environment (after vault isolation)
270 mg
Example: LOCA in Divertor cooling loop (3)