Upload
asifraza94
View
256
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Selecting the Right Key Performance Indicators
1/3
Selecting the Right Key Performance Indicators
An effective set of interlocking indicators provides feedback to individuals, groups, and the
enterprise, directing the behavior of all.
By Anthony McNeeney, Meridium
Measures of performance have been used by management for centuries to review current operationalcapabilities. Such measures have been used to assess both departmental and corporate performance, as
well as trend performance achieved against plan.
In many industrial facilities, these measurements are related to safety (number of incidents), environmental
(number of releases), costs (percentage of departmental budgets used), and production (comparison of
actual vs targeted production output). These measures are needed in order to determine not only if
resources and costs have been managed for the production achieved, but also whether the assets or plant
remain in good health. Clearly, these measures provide assurance that asset policies in place today do not
limit capabilities for tomorrow.
In order to define a complete set of performance measures, companies must ensure that simple, workablemeasures are in place. The real challenge is not only to select those indicators that satisfy budgetary goals,
but also to build the activities needed to meet the levels of asset performance required to meet strategic
goals.
Selecting the right measures is vital for effectiveness. Even more importantly, the metrics must be built into a
performance measurement system that allows individuals and groups to understand how their behaviors and
activities are fulfilling the overall corporate goals.
BUILDING AND TESTING PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
As with many management issues, it is often best to build a solution in stages. Suggested stages for
performance indicators are:
1. Define the links between corporate goals and major operational perspectives.
2. Map these strategic links to required processes in each perspective area.
3. Define a set of near-term and medium-term metrics which drive the new outcomes in each perspective.
4. Define the gaps and dependencies across the organization which will need to be bridged to result in
corporate success.
5. Implement the metrics as individual and group scorecards and monitor to secure the strategic results.
Use the SMART test
S = Specific: clear and focused to avoid misinterpretation.
M = Measurable: can be quantified and compared to other data.
A = Attainable: achievable, reasonable, and credible under conditions expected.
R = Realistic: fits into the organization's constraints and is cost effective.
T = Timely: doable within the time frame given.
Key performance indicators should be trendable, observable, reliable, measurable, and specific.
back to article
http://www.mt-online.com/articles/0405meridium.cfm#box1text%23box1texthttp://www.mt-online.com/articles/0405meridium.cfm#box1text%23box1text8/3/2019 Selecting the Right Key Performance Indicators
2/3
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR MANAGING RISK AND IMPROVING
PROFITABILITY
High level goal: Manage Risk and Improve Profitability of Chemical Plant
Operations Perspective Reliability Perspective Work Management
Perspective
Safety and
Environmental
Perspective
Goals: Reduce operating
costs and risks;
maximize output
Goals: Maximize uptime;
preserve plant and asset
integrity
Goals: Minimize
corrective work; restore
asset condition
Goals: Controlled,
audited environmental;
safe, audited operational
capabilities
Strategic KPI
Plant availability
Number LPO events
Time operatingoutside
deterioration
limits, percent
Plant uptime, percent
Production
targetcompliance
Strategic KPI
Plant availability
Proactive work
orders, percent
Emergency work
orders on high critical
systems, percent
Significant
deterioration
mechanisms
improvements
Inspection compliance
Protective device
schedule compliance
Quantified reliability
target, number
Predictive
maintenancecompliance
Strategic KPI
Planning compliance
Work order complete
(within 20 percent
of planned costs)
Proactive work orders,
percent
Scheduling compliance
Assessments of work
order complete,
number
Quantified availability
targets, number
Strategic KPI
Incident rate
Safety performance
index
PHA/reviews completed,
number
PSM compliance audits,
number
Significant
environmental aspects
defined/quantified,
number
Operational KPI
Process availability
variance
Utility variance
Product transfer
indicator
Quality limit
excursions, number
Actual counter
measures, number Startup indicators
Shutdown indicators
Offspec product
Scrap value
Inventory
Operational KPI
MTBF by equipment
type, area
MTBR by equipment
type, area
MTBM by equipment
type, area
MTBF growth
Cumulative
nonavailability ofcritical assets
Unscheduled
maintenance events,
number
Completed work
order records on
significant failures,
Operational KPI
Emergency work
orders, percent
Reactive work
orders, percent
Backlog work
orders, number
Overtime hours,
percent
Work ordersplanned, number
Cumulative
maintenance costs
for standing order
Average direct cost
per maintenance event
Work orders
Operational KPI
Outstanding items
from monthly safety
inspection report,
number
E&S A incidents,
number
E&S B incidents,
number
E&S C incidents,number
Total days lost days
due to injury
PHA action items
8/3/2019 Selecting the Right Key Performance Indicators
3/3
number
Bad actor count
Current mechanical
availability
Mechanical availability
trend
scheduled, number
Rework, percent
Closed work orders
within 2 days of
schedule, percent