Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
RESEARCH ARTICLE 1
Secretion of Phospholipase Dδ Functions as a Regulatory Mechanism in 2
Plant Innate Immunity 3
4
Jingjing Xinga,b,1
, Xiaojuan Lia,c,1
, Xiaohua Wanga, Xueqin Lv
c, Li Wang
a, Liang 5
Zhanga, Yingfang Zhu
b, Qianhua Shen
d, František Baluška
e, Jozef Šamaj
f, and 6
Jinxing Lina,c,2
7
8 aInstitute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 9
bKey Laboratory of Plant Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, 10
Kaifeng 457001, China 11 cBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design and 12
College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 13
100083, China 14 dState Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Centre for Molecular 15
Agrobiology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of 16
Sciences, Beijing100101, China 17 eInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms- University 18
Bonn, Department of Plant Cell Biology, Bonn D-53115, Germany 19 fCentre of the Region Hana for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of 20
Science, Palacky University, Olomouc 78301, Czech Republic 21 1These authors contributed equally to this work. 22
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected] 23
Short title: Secretion of phospholipase Dδ in innate immunity 24
One-sentence summary: Membrane microdomains and PLDδ exocytosis regulate PLDδ 25
accumulation during penetration resistance in plant innate immunity. 26
The author(s) responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in 27
this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors 28
(www.plantcell.org) is Jinxing Lin ([email protected]). 29
ABSTRACT 30
Plant phospholipase Ds (PLDs), essential regulators of phospholipid signaling, function 31
in multiple signal transduction cascades; however, the mechanisms regulating PLDs in 32
response to pathogens remain unclear. Here, we found that Arabidopsis thaliana PLDδ 33
Plant Cell Advance Publication. Published on October 9, 2019, doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00534
©2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved
2
accumulated in cells at the entry sites of the barley powdery mildew fungus, Blumeria 34
graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh). Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) 35
and single-molecule analysis, we observed higher PLDδ density in the plasma membrane 36
after chitin treatment; PLDδ also underwent rapid exocytosis. Fluorescence resonance 37
energy transfer with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FRET-FLIM) showed 38
that the interaction between PLDδ and the microdomain marker AtREMORIN 1.3 39
(AtREM 1.3) increased in response to chitin, indicating that exocytosis facilitates rapid, 40
efficient sorting of PLDδ into microdomains upon pathogen stimulus. We further 41
unveiled a tradeoff between Brefeldin A (BFA)-resistant and sensitive pathways in 42
secretion of PLDδ under diverse conditions. Upon pathogen attack, PLDδ secretion 43
involved syntaxin-associated VAMP721/722-mediated exocytosis sensitive to BFA. 44
Analysis of phosphatidic acid (PA), H2O2 and jasmonic acid (JA) levels, and expression 45
of related genes indicated that the relocalization of PLDδ is crucial for its activation to 46
produce PA and initiate ROS and JA signaling pathways. Together, our findings revealed 47
that the translocation of PLDδ to papillae is modulated by exocytosis, thus triggering 48
PA-mediated signaling in plant innate immunity. 49
INTRODUCTION 50
Phospholipids, the bilayer-forming structural components of membranes, have novel and 51
unexpected roles in cell signaling (Wang and Chapman, 2013). The phospholipase D 52
(PLD) family of enzymes, which directly generate phosphatidic acid (PA) through the 53
hydrolysis of structural phospholipids, plays a vital role in lipid-based signaling cascades 54
in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana has 12 genes that encode PLDs of six types (three genes 55
for PLDα, two for PLDβ, three for PLDγ, one for PLDδ and PLDε, and two for PLDζ) 56
and these types have distinguishably biochemical and regulatory properties (Zhang et al., 57
2003; Hong et al., 2016; Takáč et al., 2019). Considerable work has focused on the 58
regulatory functions of PLD signaling pathways, which alter cellular and physiological 59
3
processes in response to different stimuli, including abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, reactive 60
oxygen species, and freezing (Bargmann and Munnik, 2006; Guo et al., 2012; Li et al., 61
2004; Mishra et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2003). Distinct from other PLDs, PLDδ is 62
activated by oleic acid and serves as a direct link between the plasma membrane (PM) 63
and the microtubule cytoskeleton (Gardiner et al., 2001; Pleskot et al., 2013; Wang and 64
Wang, 2001). Previous studies of the specific properties of PLDδ have focused on its role 65
in the responses to abiotic stresses, such as tolerance of freezing, dehydration, and 66
high-salt stress, as well as in ABA-induced leaf senescence (Jia et al., 2013; Katagiri et 67
al., 2001; Li et al., 2004). 68
Increasing evidence suggests that phospholipid-derived molecules and PLD enzymes 69
play roles in plant–pathogen interactions (Kachroo and Kachroo, 2009; Laxalt and 70
Munnik, 2002; Pinosa et al., 2013). For example, in rice (Oryza sativa) challenged with 71
the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae, PLDα1-like PLDs cluster in the plasma 72
membrane adjacent to the bacterial cells in leaves undergoing an immune response. The 73
translocation of PLDs in response to pathogen attack suggests that these PLDs are 74
activated in response to pathogens and function in the resistance interaction (Wang et al., 75
2006; Young et al., 1996). PA, a vital signaling lipid produced by PLD, has also been 76
reported to activate multiple cellular responses in plant defense, including the oxidative 77
burst and mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades (Rentel et al., 2004; Rizzo et al., 78
2000). Furthermore, PA accumulates in response to pathogen-associated molecular 79
patterns (PAMPs), inducing pathogen-related gene expression and cell death (Testerink 80
and Munnik, 2011). As PLD is a pivotal regulator of phospholipid signaling in plant cells, 81
its location is closely associated with its function. 82
Plant innate immunity endows entire species of plants with resistance to potentially 83
infectious pathogens, such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Epidermal penetration 84
resistance, a key aspect of innate immunity, hinders fungi from entering the plant and 85
4
involves the localized formation of cell wall appositions known as papillae (Nielsen et al., 86
2012). In Arabidopsis, two separate pathways enhance penetration resistance; one 87
pathway involves syntaxin (PEN1) and the other involves a combination of peroxisomal 88
β-glycosyl hydrolase (PEN2) and the PM-localized ABC transporter PEN3 (Clay et al., 89
2009; Lipka et al., 2008; Lipka et al., 2005; Stein et al., 2006). During these 90
well-described plant defense processes, PLDδ is also reported to be involved in the basal 91
defense and non-host resistance response (Pinosa et al., 2013). Nevertheless, the 92
functions of phospholipid signaling pathways during these plant defense processes have 93
remained largely unknown, and the translocation of PLDδ and downstream signaling in 94
the Arabidopsis–Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) plant–fungus interactions remain 95
to be further elucidated. 96
Earlier studies have focused on the functions of PA in plant defense signaling (Rentel 97
et al., 2004; Rizzo et al., 2000); however, the relocalization and accumulation of PLDδ in 98
response to pathogens remained to be examined and may be a key step for signal 99
transmission in plant innate immunity. In this study, we examined PLDδ exocytosis in 100
plant innate immunity during plant–pathogen interactions, with particular emphasis on 101
the spatio-temporal dynamics of PLDδ translocation. Furthermore, we explored whether 102
the partitioning of PLDδ in plant defense is associated with membrane microdomains. 103
Our comprehensive analyses offer insight into the diverse regulation of PLDδ secretion in 104
penetration resistance and may also serve as a model of how membrane phospholipases 105
control phospholipid signaling in response to pathogens. 106
RESULTS 107
PLDδ Aggregates in Plasma Membrane Microdomains during Bgh Infection 108
To characterize the subcellular localization of Arabidopsis PLDδ in penetration resistance 109
against Bgh, we expressed a PLDδ-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion under the 110
5
control of the 35S promoter and the native PLDδ promoter in wild type and pldδ mutants. 111
To test whether PLDδ-GFP retained function, we then examined the resistance phenotype 112
of wild-type (Col-0), p35S:PLDδ-GFP/Col-0, pPLDδ:PLDδ-GFP/pldδ, and pldδ plants. 113
Measurement of penetration rates and hypersensitive response (HR)-associated cell death 114
in Bgh-infected leaves showed that PLDδ-GFP retained function and PLDδ was required 115
for penetration resistance (Supplemental Figure 1). We further analyzed the subcellular 116
localization of PLDδ-GFP using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Upon Bgh 117
infection, a striking accumulation of PLDδ-GFP was observed at the Bgh penetration sites 118
and GFP signal remained localized at the papillae in the extracellular space after 119
plasmolysis (Figure 1A–1G). When the membrane in the papillae was stained with the 120
fluorescent lipophilic dye FM4-64, the red signal of this dye overlapped with the GFP 121
signal at penetration sites, revealing colocalization of the preformed papillae with 122
PLDδ-GFP (Figure 1H–1K). These results showed that PLDδ was targeted mainly to the 123
membranes of papillae in the extracellular space during infection by Bgh. 124
To study the role of PLDδ in defense responses, we treated the plants with the fungal 125
elicitor chitin, as described previously (Underwood and Somerville, 2013) and used 126
fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) to measure the density of PLDδ-GFP in the 127
PM in vivo (Li et al., 2011). We found that the average density of PLDδ-GFP in the PM 128
was 7.9 ± 0.5 molecules μm2
in the resting condition (no chitin), but that of the 129
chitin-treated cells was 44% higher, at 14.1 ± 1.5 molecules μm2
. Cycloheximide 130
(CHX), an inhibitor of de novo protein synthesis, suppressed this increase, resulting in a 131
PLDδ-GFP protein density of only 5.7 ± 0.1 molecules μm2
in plants treated with CHX 132
plus chitin (Figure 2A and B). Moreover, immunoblot analysis showed that the 133
abundance of PLDδ-GFP increased in response to chitin in the PM and in the entire cell 134
and that CHX pretreatment inhibited this rise (Figure 2C, Supplemental Figure 2). Using 135
total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM), we found that the 136
fluorescence intensities of PLDδ-GFP at the PM were not homogeneous and more 137
6
PLDδ-GFP aggregation foci occurred in the chitin-treated plants (Figure 2D and E). 138
To determine how the cell recruited PLDδ-GFP to the PM, we examined the dynamics 139
of PLDδ-GFP within the PM using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). 140
The FRAP analysis showed that in the chitin-treated cells, PLDδ-GFP had a shorter 141
average half-life (t1/2, chitin = 5.93 ± 0.29 min, t1/2, control = 7.36 ± 0.35 min) in the PM and a 142
higher percentage of recovery (chitin-treated: 38.82 ± 1.51%, control: 33.64 ± 0.97%) 143
compared to the resting condition (Figure 2F and G). The fluorescence recovery curve of 144
membrane-resident proteins describes the sum of the lateral mobility of the protein in the 145
membrane and the exchange of proteins between cytoplasmic vesicles and the membrane 146
via exocytosis and endocytosis. 147
To separate these effects, we divided the initial bleaching regions into top, middle, and 148
bottom sectors; lateral mobility from adjacent membrane regions will preferentially 149
increase recovery in the top and bottom sectors, but exocytosis-mediated exchange will 150
contribute evenly to all three sectors. We found that the three regions recovered at equal 151
rates (Supplemental Figure 3A–D and Table 1). When we photobleached GFP signals on 152
the cell surface and measured FRAP signals from the center, the periphery, and the 153
entirety of the bleached areas over time, the results showed that these three regions also 154
recovered at equal rates (Supplemental Figure 4). These results indicated that PLDδ-GFP 155
is primarily recruited from the cytoplasm to the PM via exocytosis; therefore, the rate of 156
recovery represents the rate of exocytosis. Moreover, we examined the regions next to the 157
bleached regions (magenta circles in Supplemental Figure 4) and found that the 158
fluorescence signal was increased by chitin treatments compared to that under control 159
conditions (Supplemental Figure 4). Based on this, we found that the exocytosis rate of 160
PLDδ-GFP showed a 15% increase in chitin-treated cells compared to the control cells 161
(Figure 2H). 162
Protein Sorting into Microdomains Is Related to the Focal Accumulation of PLDδ 163
7
PMs are highly organized structures that contain diverse coexisting microdomains (Jarsch 164
et al., 2014), and previous proteomics studies have detected PLDδ in the 165
detergent-resistant membrane fraction from plants (Demir et al., 2013; Shahollari et al., 166
2005). To investigate whether the localization of PLDδ is associated with microdomains 167
during penetration resistance, we used AtREM1.3 as a marker of sterol-rich membrane 168
microdomains and created transgenic plants coexpressing AtREM1.3-mCherry and 169
PLDδ-GFP. At 48 h postinfection (hpi) with Bgh, AtREM1.3-mCherry accumulated in the 170
papillae and colocalized with the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP in foci (Figure 3A–D), 171
implying that the papillary extracellular membrane also included microdomains and that 172
PLDδ was contained within these microdomains during the penetration resistance 173
response. 174
We quantified the colocalization of AtREM1.3-mCherry and PLDδ-GFP using the 175
protein proximity index (PPI), revealing that the mean PPI value for PLDδ-GFP and 176
AtREM1.3-mCherry was 0.90 ± 0.05 after chitin exposure, but only 0.66 ± 0.06 in the 177
resting condition. This indicated that the degree of colocalization between PLDδ-GFP and 178
AtREM1.3-mCherry increased from “more than moderate” to “very strong” during the 179
PAMP response (Figure 3E–I). 180
We further used fluorescence resonance energy transfer with fluorescence lifetime 181
imaging microscopy (FRET-FLIM) to confirm the interaction between PLDδ-GFP and 182
AtREM1.3-mCherry. The fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP alone in the PM of 183
epidermal cells was ~2.38 ± 0.04 ns. In the transgenic line coexpressing free-GFP and 184
AtREM1.3-mCherry, the mean GFP fluorescence lifetime of Free-GFP (2.35 ± 0.05 ns) 185
showed no meaningful difference from that of PLDδ-GFP alone. However, the average 186
GFP fluorescence lifetime was strongly reduced in the plants coexpressing PLDδ-GFP 187
and AtREM1.3-mCherry (2.23 ± 0.04 ns). After treatment with chitin, the fluorescence 188
lifetime of PLDδ-GFP in these plants showed a strong reduction (to 1.98 ± 0.06 ns) in 189
8
comparison to the coexpressing plants in the control condition, with a FRET efficiency of 190
16.7% (Figure 3J–N). 191
To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the partitioning of PLDδ 192
into PM microdomains, we then investigated the dynamic behavior of individual 193
PLDδ-GFP fluorescent spots inside living cells using single-particle tracking (SPT) in 194
continuous images (Supplemental Figure 5A and C, Movies S1 and S2). Next, we 195
obtained histograms of the diffusion coefficients, which we measured by fitting the 196
particle trajectories to a Gaussian function to characterize the global mobility of 197
fluorescent spots in each treatment group, in which the Gaussian peaks (Ĝ) were defined 198
as the characteristic values for the diffusion coefficients (Cui et al., 2018; Wu et al., 199
2019). Under control conditions (no chitin), the diffusion coefficients of PLDδ-GFP 200
reflected two populations, with Ĝ values of 9.55 × 103
μm2/s (47.13%, SE 8.51 × 10
3 to 201
1.07 × 102
μm2/s) and 4.67 × 10
3 μm
2/s (52.86%, SE 3.98 to 5.50 × 10
3 μm
2/s) 202
(Supplemental Figure 5E). Under chitin treatment, the pattern was the same, with Ĝ 203
values of 9.77 × 103
μm2/s (58.69%, 9.33 × 10
3 to 1.02 × 10
2 μm
2/s) and 4.57 × 10
3 204
μm2/s (41.30%, SE 4.27 to 4.90 × 10
3 μm
2/s) (Supplemental Figure 5E). 205
By contrast, in seedlings treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), a 206
sterol-disrupting reagent, TIRFM analysis of the PLDδ-GFP fluorescent spots revealed 207
that the histogram of diffusion coefficients yielded a one-population distribution with a Ĝ 208
value of 8.91 × 103
μm2/s (SE 8.79 to 9.03 × 10
3 μm
2/s) in MβCD-treated cells and a Ĝ 209
value of 9.12 × 103
μm2/s (SE 8.95 to 9.29 × 10
3 μm
2/s) in cells pretreated with MβCD 210
and then treated with chitin (Supplemental Figure 5E). Thus, MβCD treatment caused the 211
percentage of PLDδ-GFP fluorescent spots with a fast diffusion coefficient to increase 212
and caused the subpopulation with the slow diffusion coefficient to disappear. 213
Evaluating the diffusion mode by analyzing the mean square displacement (MSD) of 214
the trajectories of individual PLDδ-GFP molecules over time (Supplemental Figure 5G), 215
9
we found that most PLDδ-GFP molecules were restricted to specific zones and had 216
restricted diffusion with or without chitin treatment. After pretreatment with MβCD, the 217
movement type of PLDδ-GFP molecules changed from restricted diffusion to Brownian 218
diffusion (Supplemental Figure 5G). Moreover, we performed experiments to examine 219
whether the PLDδ-generated PA was affected by the sterol-enriched microdomain 220
location. When the membrane sterol was predepleted by MβCD treatment, PLD activity 221
was decreased and the chitin-induced PA production was reduced compared to the chitin 222
treatment without MβCD (Supplemental Figure 6). 223
To test the effect of membrane microdomain disruption on the recruitment of 224
PLDδ-GFP to sites of attempted penetration by Bgh, we syringe-infiltrated leaves with 225
different concentrations of MβCD 1 h before inoculation with Bgh and then observed the 226
localization of PLDδ-GFP at Bgh penetration sites at 48 hpi (Supplemental Figure 7A and 227
B). Increasing MβCD concentrations caused progressively lower PLDδ-GFP 228
accumulation rates, ranging from 39.8 ± 0.6% for leaves treated with 0.5 μM MβCD to 229
16.8 ± 1.9% at 2 μM MβCD (Supplemental Figure 7C). We also determined the impact 230
of MβCD on Bgh penetration and found that MβCD treatment increased the penetration 231
rate to 19.81 ± 1.04%, approximately twice that measured after control treatment with 232
ddH2O (10.07 ± 1.19%) (Supplemental Figure 8A). 233
Pathogen-Inducible PLDδ Recruited in a BFA-Sensitive Manner 234
Since exocytosis of PLDδ increased in response to pathogen, we next tried to identify the 235
secretory pathway that trafficks PLDδ to the papillae. We employed the 236
vesicle-trafficking inhibitor brefeldin A (BFA), which inhibits certain ADP ribosylation 237
factor/guanine nucleotide exchange factors (ARF-GEFs), to address this question. In 238
plants treated with 50 μM BFA plus FM4-64, PLDδ-GFP showed weak intracellular 239
agglomeration that colocalized with positive BFA compartments labeled with FM4-64. In 240
addition, most punctate PLDδ-GFP structures were intact and did not accumulate in BFA 241
10
bodies (Figure 4A–C). Exposure of seedlings to chitin after BFA pretreatment led to an 242
obvious accumulation of PLDδ-GFP in BFA bodies, but many PLDδ-GFP signals 243
remained unaffected by BFA (Figure 4D–F). Quantitative analysis of PLDδ exocytosis 244
showed that the numbers of BFA bodies labeled with PLDδ-GFP increased to 481.20% of 245
control in response to chitin exposure, but the numbers of BFA-resistant vesicles marked 246
by PLDδ-GFP did not significantly change under either control or chitin treatment 247
conditions (Figure 4G and H). Cells pretreated with CHX had fewer BFA-resistant 248
vesicles and BFA bodies labeled by PLDδ-GFP (Supplemental Figure 9), indicating that 249
the secretion of PLDδ involved BFA-resistant and -sensitive pathways that were both 250
derived from de novo protein synthesis. FRAP analysis also showed that the average 251
half-life increased from 5.93 ± 0.29 min to 7.27 ± 0.26 min, and the percentage of 252
recovery decreased from 38.82 ± 1.51% to 29.21 ± 1.73% in plants treated with chitin 253
following BFA pretreatment (Figure 4I–L). In addition, we detected a 24.7% decrease of 254
the exocytosis rate in the presence of BFA (Figure 4M). 255
To further investigate whether PLDδ-GFP was associated with BFA-sensitive secretion 256
during Bgh attack, we syringe-infiltrated leaves with 300 μM BFA 1 h before inoculation 257
with Bgh and observed the localization of PLDδ-GFP at Bgh penetration sites at 48 hpi. 258
In the BFA-treated leaves, PLDδ-GFP often did not accumulate at the sites of attempted 259
Bgh penetration (Figure 4N and O), and the frequency of normal papillary PLDδ-GFP 260
accumulation decreased from 90.3 ± 5.1% to 25.8 ± 6.2% (Figure 4P). Moreover, BFA 261
treatment led an increase in the penetration rate of Bgh (Supplemental Figure 8B). 262
Bgh-Triggered PLDδ Associates with PEN1 in Vivo at the PM and Papillary 263
Extracellular Membrane 264
Previous studies revealed that treatment with BFA blocks the accumulation of PEN1 265
(Nielsen et al., 2012); therefore, we next asked whether the trafficking pathway of PLDδ 266
is associated with PEN1. In the transgenic plants coexpressing PLDδ-GFP and 267
11
mCherry-PEN1, PLDδ and PEN1 clearly colocalized at the preformed papillae after Bgh 268
inoculation (Figure 5A–D). PPI was used to quantify the fraction of colocalized 269
molecules in these plants, revealing a mean value of 0.23 ± 0.05 for the proximity of 270
PLDδ-GFP to mCherry-PEN1 in the resting condition, which increased to 0.63 ± 0.07 271
after treatment with chitin (Supplemental Figure 10A–E), representing a change in the 272
degree of colocalization between PLDδ and PEN1 from “weak” to “more than moderate.” 273
We also used FLIM to detect FRET between PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-PEN1 in the PM 274
of epidermal cells. FRET-FLIM analysis revealed a reduction in the fluorescence lifetime 275
of PLDδ-GFP from 2.39 ± 0.05 ns in the PLDδ-GFP-expressing plants to 2.22 ± 0.02 ns 276
in the PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1-coexpressing plants, whereas the GFP fluorescence 277
lifetime did not decrease in the transgenic lines coexpressing Free-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 278
(2.36 ± 0.04 ns). 279
When the PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1-coexpressing plants were treated with chitin for 280
1 h, the fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP further decreased to 1.99 ± 0.05 ns and 281
yielded a FRET efficiency of 17.0%, indicating that chitin enhanced the interaction of 282
PLDδ and PEN1 (Figure 5E–I). Using coimmunoprecipitation to analyze the possible 283
interaction between PLDδ and PEN1, we found that mCherry-PEN1 immunoprecipitated 284
with PLDδ-GFP in transgenic plants coexpressing the two proteins, indicating that PEN1 285
interacts with PLDδ in vivo (Figure 5J). 286
PLDδ Is Trafficked to the Papillae via VAMP721/722-Mediated Secretion 287
PEN1 interacts with VAMP721/722 to mediate a pathway involved in secretion for the 288
execution of penetration resistance (Kwon et al., 2008b); therefore, we hypothesized that 289
PLDδ may share the same exocytosis pathway as PEN1 or play a role in the function of 290
the PEN1–SNAP33–VAMP721 complex. We generated transgenic plants coexpressing 291
PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-VAMP721 to further confirm the pathway is involved in 292
trafficking of PLDδ. At 48 hpi with Bgh, PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-VAMP721 colocalized 293
12
in the papillae (Figure 6A–D). More importantly, of the 173 PLDδ-GFP-labeled 294
compartments observed in the cytoplasm, 153 (88.4%) colocalized with cytoplasmic 295
bodies labeled with mCherry-VAMP721 after treatment with chitin for 1 h (Figure 6E–J). 296
Similar phenomena were observed in the transgenic plants coexpressing PLDδ-GFP and 297
mCherry-VAMP722 (Supplemental Figure 11A–J). 298
To investigate whether trafficking of PLDδ protein to the papillae is affected by 299
VAMP721/722-mediated secretion, we obtained PLDδ-GFP vamp721/
, PLDδ-GFP 300
vamp722/
, PLDδ-GFP vamp721+/
vamp722/
, and PLDδ-GFP vamp721/
vamp722+/
301
plants. In the vamp721/
, vamp722/
, vamp721+/
vamp722/
, and vamp721/
302
vamp722+/
mutant backgrounds, PLDδ protein was properly targeted to papillae after 303
incubation with Bgh for 48 h (Figure 6K–N). To quantify the effect of VAMP721/722 in 304
PLDδ trafficking, we counted the PLDδ-GFP foci in papillae in the PLDδ-GFP 305
vamp721/
and PLDδ-GFP vamp722/
plants and found that deficiency of 306
VAMP721/722 led to decreases in the frequency of PLDδ-GFP accumulation on papillae 307
from 78.55 ± 4.20% to 41.26 ± 3.78% in vamp721/
and 40.94 ± 3.05% in vamp722/
at 308
48 hpi (Figure 6O). Compared to the PLDδ-GFP vamp721+/+
vamp722+/+
control plants, 309
the targeting efficiency of PLDδ-GFP in PLDδ-GFP vamp721+/
vamp722/
and 310
PLDδ-GFP vamp721/
vamp722+/
plants further decreased, to 12.94 ± 3.02% and 16.02 311
± 6.32%, respectively, at 48 hpi (Figure 6O). 312
PLDδ Function in Penetration Resistance Is Diminished in the Absence of the 313
SNARE Complex 314
PLD-derived PA is reported to play an essential role in basal defense and non-host 315
resistance (Pinosa et al., 2013). Therefore, we tested whether the mistargeting of PLDδ to 316
papillae in SNARE mutants could influence the resistance function of PLDδ. Using a 317
biosensor based on the PA-binding protein Spo20p fused to a fluorescent reporter, we 318
found that PA accumulated in the pathogen entry site in a pattern similar to the 319
13
distribution of PLDδ-GFP (Figure 7A–D). The pldδ mutants showed decreased 320
chitin-induced PA production compared to the wild type following chitin treatment. 321
Consistent with those observations, chitin-induced PA production was reduced in the 322
pen1 and vamp721/722 mutants, as confirmed by the relative levels of 323
phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamin (PE), two main substrates of 324
PLDδ, measured in pldδ, pen1, and vamp721/722 mutants (Figure 7E, Supplemental 325
Figure 12). 326
Furthermore, we analyzed the levels of H2O2 and jasmonic acid (JA) in pldδ, pen1, 327
and vamp721/722 mutants and wild-type plants under chitin treatment. The pldδ mutants 328
exhibited much lower H2O2 and JA accumulation than the wild-type plants, indicating 329
that the loss of PLDδ disrupted the plants’ ability to produce H2O2 and JA in response to 330
chitin (Figure 7F, Supplemental Figure 13). More importantly, the production of H2O2 331
and JA after chitin treatment decreased in the absence of the SNARE complex (Figure 7F, 332
Supplemental Figure 13). 333
To explore the molecular basis for the susceptible phenotype of pldδ and snare 334
mutants, we tested the expression levels of the important plant defense genes PDF1.2 335
(PLANT DEFENSIN GENE 1.2), PDK1.1 (3-PHOSPHOINOSITIDE DEPENDENT 336
PROTEIN KINASE-1), PHI1 (PHOSPHATE-INDUCED 1.1), and RBOHF 337
(RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG F). RT-qPCR analysis showed that the 338
transcript levels of PDF1.2, PDK1.1, PTI1, and RBOHF were dramatically lower in pldδ 339
and snare mutants than in wild-type plants (Figure 7G and H, Supplemental Figure 13). 340
These results suggest that loss of function of PEN1, VAMP721, and VAMP722 attenuates 341
the function of PLDδ in response to pathogens. 342
DISCUSSION 343
Innate immunity helps plants defend themselves against potentially infectious pathogens, 344
14
such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi. For powdery mildew fungi, resistance to penetration 345
at the attack site of the fungus involves a well-described innate immunity process that 346
depends on the formation of papillae, which are rich in antimicrobial compounds, at the 347
site of attempted penetration. The strong focal accumulation of proteins involved in 348
penetration resistance at papillae is considered to be important for their function (Assaad 349
et al., 2004; Stein et al., 2006). In this study, we found that the loss of PLDδ caused 350
defects in penetration resistance, in agreement with the conclusion reported recently 351
(Zhang et al., 2018). Furthermore, we demonstrated that PLDδ was targeted to the 352
papillary extracellular membrane, which is the extracellular site of the host membrane 353
The PM provides a physical barrier for the cell and a transfer station for vesicle 354
trafficking in many processes, including penetration resistance. Previous studies used 355
transmission electron microscopy to reveal large numbers of exosomes, termed 356
paramural bodies (PMBs), within the papillary matrix and clusters of multivesicular 357
bodies (MVBs) in close proximity to the site of pathogen attack, indicating that the 358
trafficking destination of the MVB cargos was the PM and that PMBs were also derived 359
from the PM (An et al., 2006; Nielsen et al., 2012). Here, our immunoblotting assay 360
showed a higher abundance of PLDδ-GFP protein following chitin treatment and a lower 361
PLDδ-GFP abundance in the PM following treatment with CHX. The highly dynamic 362
nature of PM proteins means that analyzing the density and dynamics of PLDδ molecules 363
within living cells during the pathogen response poses a challenge; therefore, we applied 364
single-molecule approaches with high spatial and temporal accuracy to characterize the 365
dynamics of PLDδ in the PM. Using FCS and TIRFM analysis, we found PLDδ-GFP 366
accumulated in the PM under pathogen stimulation. By measuring the spatial and 367
temporal dynamics of individual fluorescent spots of PLDδ directly at the plasma 368
membrane in living cells, our in vivo analysis offers another powerful way to understand 369
the dynamics of PLDδ and its regulatory mechanisms. 370
15
The PM contains highly compartmentalized structures that are partitioned into 371
different types of microdomains, which function in the transduction of various signals in 372
plant cells, especially during the early stages of fungal infection (Bhat et al., 2005) and 373
during other PAMP-induced signaling processes (Fujiwara et al., 2009; Keinath et al., 374
2010; Stanislas et al., 2009). AtREM1.3 resides in sterol-rich microdomains in the PM 375
(Demir et al., 2013) and is associated with fungal infection (Bozkurt et al., 2014). Our 376
results showed that the interaction between PLDδ and AtREM1.3 was enhanced in the 377
presence of chitin, suggesting that the pathogen-triggered, newly translated PLDδ 378
proteins are sorted into AtREM1.3-labeled sterol-rich microdomains. Parallel 379
experiments using MβCD plus chitin treatment showed that sterol depletion led to 380
decreased PLDδ-GFP accumulation and lower PA production. Since distinct subcellular 381
localizations of PLDs led to the production of PA at specific regions of cell membranes 382
(Liu et al., 2013), and PLDs might be recruited to subdomains at the PM (Novák et al., 383
2018), we proposed that the microdomain localization of PLDδ contributes to the 384
activation of PLDδ and might be related to the local production of the lipid secondary 385
messenger PA. 386
In exocytosis, membrane-bound vesicles fuse with the PM and release their contents to 387
the outside, a process that is closely involved with plant immunity (Kwon et al., 2008a). 388
Accumulating evidence from studying the interaction of Arabidopsis with the Bgh fungus 389
points to a key role of exocytosis in plant innate immunity (Yun et al., 2008). Although 390
substantial genetic analysis has focused on the pathogen-trigged immune response, the 391
regulatory mechanism of exocytosis in plant–pathogen interactions has largely been 392
neglected. In the present study, we detected a rapid recovery and an increased exocytosis 393
rate of PLDδ after stimulation by chitin. From the different recovery rates after 394
photobleaching, we conclude that the PLDδ was rapidly recruited from the cytoplasm to 395
the PM by secretion following chitin treatment and that exocytosis provides a fast and 396
efficient way to control PLDδ activity in response to pathogen attack. 397
16
In plants, exocytosis via the endomembrane system and secreted proteins are crucial 398
for cell wall deposition and modification in response to biotic stimuli (Surpin et al., 399
2004). The ARF-GEF inhibitor BFA, a well-known inhibitor of secretory and endocytic 400
pathways, is a useful diagnostic tool for recognizing the mode of exocytosis (Beck et al., 401
2012; Ding et al., 2014; Kleine-Vehn et al., 2006). In our study, no conventional signal 402
peptide sequence was found in PLDδ predicted by the SignalP 3.0 server 403
(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) or the TargetP 1.1 server 404
(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/), indicating that PLDδ was exported by a signal 405
peptide-independent secretory process. We further found that the secretion of PLDδ can 406
occur in both BFA-resistant and BFA-sensitive manners. The BFA-resistant pathway of 407
PLDδ appears to be unaffected in response to pathogen stimuli, while the exocytosis of 408
PLDδ by the BFA-sensitive pathway significantly increased. These findings suggested 409
that PLDδ may constitutively be recycled in a BFA-resistant manner in resting 410
conditions, but upon perception of pathogen, the BFA-sensitive pathway is dramatically 411
enhanced. These observations provide strong evidence that plants have evolved a 412
mechanism to respond to pathogen attack by a trade-off that alters the dynamic 413
equilibrium between BFA-resistant and -sensitive exocytic pathways. 414
Vesicle trafficking functions as a vital part of the extracellular immune response to 415
ascomycete pathogens in Arabidopsis (Collins et al., 2003; Kwon et al., 2008b). 416
Vesicle-associated secretion mediated by PEN1 and its SNARE partners SNAP33 and 417
endomembrane-resident VAMP721/722 can enable the execution of penetration 418
resistance, and this secretion pathway can be blocked by treatment with BFA (Nielsen et 419
al., 2012; Underwood and Somerville, 2013; Zhang et al., 2019). In our study, BFA 420
effectively blocked the secretion and accumulation of PLDδ-GFP, which was similar to 421
its effect on PEN1. Moreover, we found that chitin significantly enhanced the 422
colocalization and interaction of PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-PEN1, and the deficiency of 423
VAMP721/722 led to a decrease in papillary PLDδ-GFP accumulation. Taken together, 424
17
these findings demonstrated that PEN1-associated VAMP721/722-mediated secretion 425
enables the translocation of PLDδ during attack by powdery mildew fungi. 426
PA generated by PLDs is considered as a secondary messenger and interacts with 427
effector proteins such as protein kinases, phosphatases, NADPH oxidases, modulating 428
their activity, thus amplifying the signal to initiate plant defense signaling (Rentel et al., 429
2004; Rizzo et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2006). Zhang et al (2018) reported that PLDδ 430
knockout plants showed enhanced susceptibility to lettuce powdery mildew 431
(Golovinomyces cichoracearum, Gc UCSC1), but they did not detect the changes of JA 432
levels after 5 days postinfection (dpi) under Gc UCSC1 attack (Zhang et al., 2018). In our 433
study, we observed that pldδ mutants exhibited markedly lower levels of PA, H2O2, and 434
JA than wild-type plants, partly due to the differences in the timing of examination and 435
different effects on JA levels induced in various pathogen species. Likewise, the genes 436
related to PA, ROS and JA signaling were down-regulated in pldδ mutants as compared 437
with wild-type plants, indicating that the absence of PLDδ disturbed the plants’ ability to 438
produce H2O2 and JA in response to the chitin stimulus. Moreover, snare mutants and 439
pldδ mutants showed similar phenotypes in response to pathogen stimuli, suggesting that 440
the delivery of PLDδ mediated by the SNARE complex contributed to the resistance 441
function of PLDδ. In combination with the accumulation of PA at papillae, these findings 442
support the hypothesis that the translocation of PLDδ to papillae depends on a 443
PEN1/VAMP721/722-mediated secretion pathway, which is accompanied by PLDδ 444
activation and production of PA, thus triggering PA-mediated signaling in the plant 445
defense response. 446
In summary, our investigation of the dynamic behaviors of PLDδ has provided a more 447
global view of the mechanism of translocation of this phospholipase in the immune 448
response to pathogens. The focal concentration of PLDδ at pathogen entry sites is 449
important for its function and is regulated by diverse secretory pathways. Consequently, 450
PM microdomains likely harbor unique sets of signaling proteins or serve as signaling 451
18
platforms in penetration resistance, acting as transfer stations to deliver 452
pathogen-inducible PLDδ to the papillae. This study produced three novel findings: (1) 453
secretion of PLDδ functions as a fast and efficient way to control PLDδ accumulation in 454
response to pathogen attack; (2) plants have evolved a dynamic equilibrium between 455
BFA-resistant and -sensitive exocytic pathways in the secretion of PLDδ under diverse 456
conditions, and the exocytosis of pathogen-inducible PLDδ in BFA-sensitive manner 457
requires PEN1-associated VAMP721/722-mediated secretion; and (3) AtREM1.3-labeled 458
sterol-rich microdomains act as essential platforms for the transportation and 459
accumulation of PLDδ. Taken together, these findings reveal a novel regulatory 460
mechanism involving membrane microdomains and exocytosis in the relocalization of 461
PLDδ, aiding in the execution of penetration resistance against a fungal pathogen. 462
METHODS 463
Plant and Fungal Growth 464
The Arabidopsis thaliana pldδ mutant expressing the transgene PLDδ-GFP driven by the 465
endogenous PLDδ promoter and the pldδ mutant (SALK_023247) was used in all 466
experiments (Pinosa et al., 2013). The p35S:AtREM1.3-mCherry vectors were described 467
previously by Xue et al. (2018). The vamp721/
, vamp722/
, vamp721+/
vamp722/
, 468
and vamp721/
vamp722+/
mutants and Arabidopsis expressing the transgene 469
pVAMP721/722:mCherry-VAMP721/722 were obtained from Zhang et al. (2011). The 470
p35S:AtREM1.3-mCherry vectors were transformed into Col-0, and seedlings were 471
selected with 70 μg/mL hygromycin. For Arabidopsis coexpressing PLDδ-GFP and 472
mCherry-PEN1, PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-VAMP721/722, PLDδ-GFP and 473
AtREM1.3-mCherry, F1 lines derived from crosses between PLDδ-GFP and 474
mCherry-PEN1, mCherry-VAMP721/722, or AtREM1.3-mCherry, respectively. The 475
plants were grown at 21°C, with 12 h of white light (light intensity of 120 μmol photons 476
m−2
s−1
) per day. The barley powdery mildew fungus (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, 477
19
isolate K1) was propagated on barley (Hordeum vulgare) at 18°C in an illuminated 478
incubator. 479
Drug Treatments 480
The inhibitors BFA, CHX, and MβCD were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. CHX and BFA 481
were made into stock solutions with DMSO (50 mM for CHX and 50 mM for BFA), and 482
MβCD was dissolved in deionized water to yield a 200 mM stock solution. The PAMP 483
chitin solutions were generated by dissolving hydrolyzed chitin (purified from crab shells, 484
Sigma-Aldrich) in deionized water to a concentration of 100 μg·mL1
. FM4-64 (obtained 485
from Invitrogen) was kept as a 5 mM stock solution and diluted to a 5 μM working 486
solution with half-strength liquid Murashige and Skoog medium (1/2× liquid MS). The 487
BFA treatment combined with fungal inoculation was performed as previously described 488
(Nielsen et al., 2012). For other inhibitor treatments, seedlings were incubated in 1/2× 489
liquid MS medium containing appropriate drugs for the following times: 30 min for BFA, 490
30 min of pretreatment with BFA and 30 min for BFA plus 100 μg·mL1
chitin, 30 min 491
for MβCD, and 30 min pretreatment with MβCD plus 100 μg·mL1
chitin. Seedlings were 492
then transferred onto a slide with inhibitor solution and covered with a coverslip for 493
CLSM or variable angle (VA)-TIRFM imaging. 494
FM4-64 Detection, Plasmolysis, and FRAP Analysis Using Confocal Microscopy 495
The leaves from adult Arabidopsis plants were dipped in a solution of 0.01% (v/v) 496
Silwet/0.2% (w/v) propidium iodide to stain the Bgh spores (Nielsen et al., 2012). 497
Membrane staining was performed by incubating the adult leaves with 3 μM FM4-64 for 498
30 min before observation, and plasmolysis experiments were conducted by incubating 499
the adult leaves with 1 M mannitol for 5 min before observation. An FV1000ME 500
multiphoton laser scanning microscope (Olympus) was used to observe the FRAP of the 501
plants, and 488- and 458-nm laser lines operating at 100% were used to bleach the 502
20
PLDδ-GFP from a region of the same size in every treatment. Images were collected 1 503
min before bleaching, immediately after bleaching, and once a minute after bleaching for 504
a total of 20 min. The fluorescence recovery data obtained were corrected for bleaching 505
during imaging as previously described (Konopka et al., 2008; Underwood and 506
Somerville, 2013), and fitted curves were made using Origin 8.0 software (Origin Lab 507
Corporation). The exocytosis rate was calculated according to the methods previously 508
described (Luo et al., 2016). 509
VA-TIRFM and Single-Particle Fluorescence Image Analysis 510
The PLDδ-GFP dynamics were recorded using a VA-TIRFM technique on an inverted 511
microscope (IX-71; Olympus) with a total internal reflective fluorescence illuminator and 512
a 100× oil-immersion objective (Olympus; numerical aperture = 1.45) (Fan et al., 2013; 513
Li et al., 2012; Li et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015a; Wang et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015b; 514
Wang et al., 2018). The method described by Wang et al. (2015b) was employed for 515
single-particle tracking, which was the basis of the kinetic parameter analysis of 516
PLDδ-GFP. The diffusion coefficient was determined according to the methods 517
previously described (Li et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015b; Xiao et al., 2008). Trajectories 518
with a length of >10 frames were kept for MSD and diffusion coefficient analysis. The 519
MSD calculation of PLDδ-GFP spots was performed using the following equation: 520
521
MSD(t) =1
L−n∑ (r(s + n) − r(s))2L−n−1
s=0 [S1] 522
where n = t/t, L is the length of the trajectory, and r(s) is the two-dimensional position of 523
the particle in frames (Goulian and Simon, 2000). The diffusion coefficient for a spot was 524
determined by fitting a line to MSD with n running from 1 to the largest integer ≤L/4 525
(Saxton, 1997). In the text, a single (or multiple) Gaussian fit(s) of the diffusion 526
coefficient (D) histograms represents the diffusion coefficients of PLDδ-GFP spots. 527
21
Origin software (OriginLab) was used to determine the SE values of the position of the 528
peak (denoted Ĝ) in the form of an upper and a lower diffusion coefficient. Moreover, 529
parameters were performed according to Espenel et al. (2008) and used to determine the 530
motional modes (Brownian, restricted diffusion). When linearly fitted to the MSD, the 531
MSD-t plot was a straight line with a slope of 4D, representing a typical trajectory for 532
spots undergoing Brownian diffusion. If the MSD-t plot showed a negative deviation 533
from a straight line with a slope of 4D, the motion was defined as restricted diffusion. 534
Single fluorescent spots of PLDδ-GFP were detected in a time-lapse series of up to 100 535
images per sequence, which were acquired with a 200-ms exposure time. 536
FCS and PPI Analysis 537
The FCS analysis was performed using the point-scanning mode on a Leica TCS SP5 538
FCS microscope equipped with a 488-nm argon laser, in-house coupled correlator, and 539
Avalanche photodiode. Spontaneous fluctuations in fluorescence intensity were generated 540
by the diffusion of PLDδ-GFP molecules in and out of the focal plane, which can alter the 541
local concentration of the fluorophores. The density of PLDδ-GFP was detected by a laser 542
focused at the PM and calculated according to the protocol previously described by Li et 543
al. (2011). PPI was performed on confocal images using PPI software (Wu et al. 2010; 544
Zinchuk et al. 2013; Cui et al., 2019). The quantification of the degree of colocalization 545
between PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-PEN1 or AtREM1.3-mCherry was based on the review 546
by Zinchuk et al. (2013). 547
FRET-FLIM Analysis 548
FRET-FLIM analysis was performed using an inverted Olympus FV1200 microscope 549
equipped with a PicoQuant picoHarp300 controller. The excitation at 488 nm was 550
performed by a picosecond pulsed diode laser at a repetition rate of 40 MHz, via a water 551
immersion objective (60×, numerical aperture = 1.2). The emitted light was filtered with 552
22
a 520/35-nm bandpass filter and detected by an MPD SPAD detector. Data were collected 553
and analyzed using the SymphoTime 64 software (PicoQuant). 554
Coimmunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis 555
To monitor the abundance of PLDδ-GFP in the different treatment groups, total proteins 556
were extracted from the PLDδ-GFP transgenic plants grown on half-strength MS medium 557
for 3 weeks using the EZ extraction protocol (Martinez-Garcia et al., 1999). For 558
membrane protein extraction, the PLDδ-GFP plants were ground into a fine powder in 559
liquid nitrogen and mixed with extraction solution (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 2 560
mM DTT, 15 mM mercaptoethanol, 0.5% BSA, 0.25 M sucrose, 10% glycerol, and one 561
complete protease inhibitor tablet [Roche Applied Science] per 50 mL extraction buffer). 562
After being mixed in a 1:1 (v:v) ratio with SDS-PAGE buffer, the protein extraction 563
solution was heated at 95°C for 15 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm (10,625 g) for 564
5 min to remove cellular debris. The supernatants containing total proteins and membrane 565
proteins were subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE. An immunoblot analysis was performed 566
following the protocol described by Fan et al. (2013). For coimmunoprecipitation, plants 567
coexpressing PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-PEN1 were harvested, and the assay was 568
performed as previously described (Fan et al., 2013; Serino and Deng, 2007). 569
PA Analysis by Mass Spectrometry and PLD Activity Assay 570
For PA extraction, the seedlings of every genotypes were harvested under chitin treatment 571
for 0 min, 15 min, 30 min. The harvested seedlings were transferred immediately into 2 572
mL of isopropanol with 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene at 75°C. Chloroform/methanol 573
(2:1) was used to extract the tissue with three additional times with 2 h of agitation each 574
time. Then the tissues were heated overnight at 105°C and weighed. A triple quadrupole 575
tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) equipped for electrospray ionisation (ESI) was 576
employed to analyze lipid samples. The PAs in each class were quantified by comparison 577
23
with two internal standards for the class. Data processing was performed as previously 578
described (Welti et al., 2002). 579
PLD activity was assayed spectrophotometrically by measuring the free choline 580
released upon PC hydrolysis. Plant tissues were harvested under resting condition and the 581
treatments of chitin, MβCD and MβCD plus chitin. The harvested tissues were then 582
incubated with PC substrate and the reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 583
20 mM CaCl2, 1.7 mM 4-aminoantipyrine, 9 mM sodium 2-hydroxy-3, 584
5-dichlorobenzenesulfonate, 0.5 U choline oxidase and 0.5 U peroxidase for 30 min at585
30°C. The absorbance measurements at 500 nm were carried out to quantify the amounts 586
of free choline released. One unit of PLD activity was calculated as described by previous 587
study (Abdelkafi and Abousalham, 2011). 588
Statistics 589
All experimental analyses were conducted in consultation with a statistician. 590
Quantification and statistical parameters are reported in legends of each figure, including 591
error bars (SD or SE), n values, repeats of experiments, and test types. Student’s t-test 592
was used to describe differences between two groups. For those involving multiple group 593
comparisons, ANOVA followed by a post hoc test was applied. In the figures, statistically 594
significant differences are shown with asterisks as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and 595
***P < 0.001. 596
Accession Numbers 597
Sequence data from this article can be found in The Arabidopsis Information Resource 598
(TAIR) database under the following accession numbers: PLDδ (AT4G35790), AtRem1.3 599
(At2g45820), VAMP721 (AT1G04750), VAMP722 (AT2G33120), and PEN1 600
(AT3G11820). 601
24
Supplemental Data 602
Supplemental Figure 1. PLDδ is involved in non-host resistance to Bgh (supports Figure 603
1). 604
Supplemental Figure 2. The abundance of PLDδ-GFP is influenced by CHX (supports 605
Figure 2). 606
Supplemental Figure 3. FRAP analysis revealing the dynamics of PLDδ-GFP with or 607
without stimulation by chitin (supports Figure 2). 608
Supplemental Figure 4. Dynamics of PLDδ-GFP at the plasma membrane estimated by 609
FRAP (supports Figure 2). 610
Supplemental Figure 5. The effect of MβCD on PLDδ-GFP dynamics (supports Figure 611
3). 612
Supplemental Figure 6. The levels of phosphatidic acid and PLD activity under 613
stimulation of pathogen (supports Figure 3). 614
Supplemental Figure 7. MβCD blocked the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP at the Bgh entry 615
sites (supports Figure 3). 616
Supplemental Figure 8. Penetration rate of Bgh affected by MβCD or BFA (supports 617
Figure 3 and Figure 4). 618
Supplemental Figure 9. Subcellular localization of PLDδ in the presence of CHX 619
(Supports Figure 4). 620
Supplemental Figure 10. The colocalization of PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-PEN1 analyzed 621
by protein proximity index (supports Figure 5). 622
Supplemental Figure 11. The colocalization of PLDδ-GFP and mCherry-VAMP722 in 623
the cytoplasm and papillae (supports Figure 6). 624
Supplemental Figure 12. Relative levels of PC and PE levels in the absence of PLDδ 625
and the SNARE complex in response to pathogen stimuli (supports Figure 7). 626
Supplemental Figure 13. JA level and expression of JA-related genes in wild-type, pldδ, 627
pen1, vamp721/
, and vamp722/
mutant plants in response to chitin (supports Figure 7). 628
25
Supplemental Table 1. Primers used for qPCR. 629
Supplemental Movie 1. VA-TIRFM imaging of PLDδ-GFP spots in the control condition 630
at the PM of Arabidopsis leaf epidermal cells. 631
Supplemental Movie 2. VA-TIRFM imaging of PLDδ-GFP spots at the PM of 632
Arabidopsis leaf epidermal cells under chitin treatment. 633
Supplemental Movie 3. VA-TIRFM imaging of PLDδ-GFP spots at the PM of 634
Arabidopsis leaf epidermal cells treated with 10 mM MβCD. 635
Supplemental Movie 4. VA-TIRFM imaging of PLDδ-GFP spots at the PM of 636
Arabidopsis leaf epidermal cells under MβCD + chitin treatment. 637
Author contributions 638
J.J.X., X.J.L., X.H.W, and J.X.L. designed the research; J.J.X. and X.Q.L. performed the 639
research; J.J.X., X.J.L., L.W., X.Q.L., and L.Z. analyzed data; J.J.X., X.J.L., Q. H. S., F. 640
B., M. B., J. S., Y. F, Z and J.X.L. wrote the article. 641
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 642
We thank Prof. Mats X. Andersson (University of Gothenburg, Sweden) for kindly 643
providing the transgenic seeds expressing PLDδ-GFP driven by the endogenous PLDδ 644
promoter and the pldδ mutant. We also thank Prof. Ying Fu (China Agricultural 645
University, Beijing) for kindly providing the seeds expressing the transgene 646
pPEN1::mCherry-PEN1. We thank the members of the Imaging Core 647
Facility, Technology Center for Protein Sciences, Tsinghua University, for assistance with 648
using the FV1200 LSCM with the Picoquant FLIM/FCS system. This work is supported 649
by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31530084, 31622005, 31900162), 650
the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (111 project, B13007) 651
and the ERDF project "Plants as a tool for sustainable global development" (No. 652
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000827). 653
26
FIGURE LEGENDS 654
Figure 1. The Subcellular Localization of PLDδ-GFP Following Bgh Infection. (A–B) 655
Fluorescence (A) and fluorescence merged with bright-field (B) images showing that 656
PLDδ-GFP is localized at the epidermal cell membrane of the control Arabidopsis leaves. 657
(C–D) Fluorescence (C) and fluorescence merged with bright-field (D) images 658
demonstrating the localization of PLDδ-GFP at the Bgh penetration sites. The white 659
arrowheads indicate the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP. (E–G) Plasmolysis upon Bgh 660
infection showed the focal accumulation (arrowhead) of PLDδ-GFP in the papillae of the 661
periplasmic space. The fluorescence image (E) is merged with the bright-field image (F) 662
in (G). (H–K) The focal accumulation of PLDδ-GFP (H) overlaps completely (J) with the 663
FM4-64-stained papillae (I) at 48 hpi with Bgh. (K) Bright-field image of the papillae in 664
(H–J). Scale bars: 10 μm in each panel. 665
666
Figure 2. Density and Dynamics of PLDδ-GFP at the Plasma Membrane. (A) 667
Live-cell imaging of leaf epidermal cells expressing PLDδ-GFP, with the numbers 668
indicating the detection areas for FCS analysis. (B) FCS analysis determined the 669
differences in PLDδ-GFP density at the plasma membrane following treatment with 670
chitin or CHX plus chitin (n = 50, 96, and 74 measurements for the control, chitin, and 671
CHX plus chitin, respectively, from 12 seedlings for each condition. ***P < 0.001, 672
ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test). (C) Immunoblot analysis showed the abundance of 673
PLDδ-GFP in total proteins and membrane proteins in response to chitin or CHX + chitin 674
treatment. Actin and CBB (Coomassie Brilliant Blue) were used as the internal controls. 675
(D–E) Distribution of PLDδ-GFP particle fluorescence on the plasma membrane in the 676
control (D) or chitin-treated cells (E) shown by pseudocolor images (blue-yellow-red 677
palette). (F) FRAP time course of PLDδ-GFP with or without chitin treatment. White 678
squares indicate bleached regions. (G) Fluorescence recovery curves of the 679
photobleached region of interest. (H) Exocytosis rates of PLDδ-GFP with or without 680
chitin treatment. *P < 0.05, Student’s t-test. Bars represent means, error bars represent 681
standard error (SE). Scale bars: 10 μm in A and F, 3 μm in D–E. 682
683
Figure 3. Localization of PLDδ-GFP in Plasma Membrane Microdomains. (A–D) 684
Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and AtREM1.3-mCherry (B) in the papillae, with 685
merged (C) and bright-field (D) images. (E–G) Live-cell imaging of leaf epidermal cells 686
expressing PLDδ-GFP (E), AtREM1.3-mCherry (F) and the merged image (G) in the 687
control conditions. (H–I) Protein proximity index between PLDδ-GFP and 688
AtREM1.3-mCherry with or without chitin treatment (n=10, with 15 regions of interest in 689
the control condition and 30 in the chitin treatment). (J–M) Live-cell imaging (using 690
confocal microscopy) of fluorescence lifetime distribution of PLDδ-GFP in the plants 691
27
expressing PLDδ-GFP alone (J), coexpressing Free-GFP/ AtREM1.3-mCherry (K) and 692
co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/AtREM1.3-mCherry. L and M indicate the fluorescence 693
lifetime of PLDδ-GFP with (L) or without chitin treatment (M). AtREM1.3 is a marker of 694
membrane microdomains. (N) FRET-FLIM analysis revealed the fluorescence lifetime of 695
PLDδ-GFP (n = 12, with 15 regions of interest in the plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone 696
and 15 regions in the plants co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/AtREM1.3-mCherry under control 697
conditions and 19 under chitin treatment). Bars represent means, error bars in all panels 698
represent SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test in H; ANOVA and 699
post-hoc Tukey’s test in K). Scale bars: 10 μm in A–G, 2 μm in J–M. 700
701
Figure 4. Effect of BFA on the Exocytosis and Accumulation of PLDδ. (A–H) 702
Subcellular localization of PLDδ in the presence of the vesicle-trafficking inhibitor BFA 703
with (D–F) or without chitin treatment (A–C). Costaining with FM4-64 (B, E) highlights 704
the plasma membrane and BFA bodies. White arrowheads indicate BFA-resistant vesicles, 705
and the magenta arrowheads indicate BFA bodies. G and H show the quantitation of BFA 706
bodies (G) and BFA-resistant vesicles of PLDδ-GFP (H). For each experiment, at least 30 707
epidermal cells from 4 seedlings were scored (n = 3). (I–J) FRAP time course of 708
PLDδ-GFP with BFA pretreatment and chitin treatment. The white rectangle indicates the 709
bleached region (I). The initial bleached region was further subdivided into three sectors, 710
indicated by the green, red, and blue rectangles (J). (K) Fluorescence recovery curves of 711
the photobleached region of interest. (L) Fluorescence recovery curves of divided regions 712
of interest. Curves represent the best fits of mean values of six independent FRAP 713
experiments on PLDδ-GFP. (M) Exocytosis rates of PLDδ-GFP with or without BFA 714
treatment. (N–P) Accumulation of PLDδ-GFP at sites of Bgh attempted penetration with 715
(O) or without pretreatment with BFA (N). Arrowheads indicate the Bgh attempted 716
penetration sites. For each leaf, at least 49 germinated spores were scored (n = 3). Bars 717
represent means, error bars in all panels represent SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, 718
Student’s t-test. Scale bars: 20 μm in A–F and N–O; 10 μm in I; 5 μm in J. 719
720
Figure 5. Colocalization and Interaction Analysis of PLDδ with PEN1 in Living 721
Plant Cells. (A–D) Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and mCherry-PEN1 (B) in the 722
papillae, with the merged (C) and bright-field (D) images. (E–H) Live-cell imaging 723
(using confocal microscopy) of fluorescence lifetime distribution of PLDδ-GFP in the 724
plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone (E), coexpressing Free-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 (F) and 725
co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 (G–H). G and H indicate the fluorescence 726
lifetime of PLDδ-GFP with (H) or without chitin treatment (G). (I) FRET-FLIM analysis 727
revealed the change in the fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP (n = 10, with 15 regions of 728
interest in the plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone and in the plants co-expressing 729
PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 under both control condition and chitin treatment). (J) 730
Co-immunoprecipitation of PEN1 with PLDδ in transgenic Arabidopsis. Total protein 731
28
extracts from PLDδ-GFP and PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 transgenic plants were 732
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-GFP. IP proteins were detected by immunoblotting 733
with anti-mCherry antibody. Bars represent means, error bars in I represent SD. ANOVA 734
and post-hoc Tukey’s test for I. *P < 0.05. Scale bar: 10 μm in A–D; 2 μm in E–H. 735
736
Figure 6. PLDδ is Trafficked to the Papillae Via VAMP721/722-mediated Secretion 737
in Response to Chitin. (A–D) Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and mCherry-VAMP721 738
(B) in the papillae at the Bgh infection sites, with the merged (C) and bright-field (D) 739
images. (E–J) Colocalization (G, J) of PLDδ-GFP (E, H) and mCherry-VAMP721 (F, I) in 740
the cytoplasm under control conditions (E–G) or chitin treatment (H–J). Arrowheads 741
indicate the cytoplasmic bodies labeled by GFP or mCherry. (K–N) Fluorescence images 742
demonstrating the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP at the penetration sites of Bgh in 743
PLDδ-GFP vamp721-/-
plants (K), PLDδ-GFP vamp722-/-
plants (L), in PLDδ-GFP 744
vamp721+/-
vamp722-/-
(M) and PLDδ-GFP vamp721-/-
vamp722+/-
plants (N). The white 745
arrowheads in K–N indicate the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP. (O) The number of foci 746
were enumerated for at least 49 germinated spores per leaf for six leaves per genotype (n 747
= 6). Bars represent means, error bars in all panels represent SD. ANOVA and post-hoc 748
Tukey’s test for O, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bar: 10 μm in A–N. 749
750
Figure 7. PA levels, ROS accumulation, and Defense-related Gene Expression in the 751
Absence of PLDδ and the SNARE Complex in Response to Pathogen Stimuli. (A–D) 752
Focal accumulation of PLDδ-GFP (A) and a fluorescent phosphatidic acid (PA) biosensor 753
(B) in the papillae at the Bgh entry site, with bright-field (C) and merged (D) images. The 754
PA sensor is the PA-binding domain of the yeast SNARE Spo20p fused to the fluorescent 755
protein mCherry. (E) Total PA in Col-0, pldδ, pen1, vamp721-/-
, and vamp722-/-
plants 756
measured by mass spectrometry under chitin treatment for 0, 15, and 30 min. Relative PA 757
levels compared to WT at time zero (control) are presented. (F) Total H2O2 in Col-0, pldδ, 758
pen1, vamp721-/-
, and vamp722-/-
plants measured by a micro hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) 759
assay kit under chitin treatment for 0, 15, and 30 min. Relative H2O2 levels compared to 760
WT at time zero (control) are presented. (G–H) Expression of defense-related genes in 761
Col-0, pldδ, pen1, vamp721-/-
, and vamp722-/-
mutant plants in response to chitin. 762
Transcript levels were normalized to ACTIN2. Relative expression levels compared to 763
WT at time zero (control) are presented. Data bars represent the mean (± SD) of three 764
repeats. The asterisk (*) in E and F indicates the statistically significant difference in the 765
level of PC and PE compared to respective control. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. 766
Scale bars: 10 μm in A–D. 767
768
REFERENCES 769
29
Abdelkafi S, and Abousalham A. (2011). The substrate specificities of sunflower 770
and soybean phospholipases D using transphosphatidylation reaction. Lipids 771
Health Dis 10, 196. 772
An, Q., Huckelhoven, R., Kogel, K.H., and van Bel, A.J. (2006). Multivesicular 773
bodies participate in a cell wall-associated defence response in barley leaves 774
attacked by the pathogenic powdery mildew fungus. Cell Microbiol 8, 775
1009-1019. 776
Assaad, F.F., Qiu, J.L., Youngs, H., Ehrhardt, D., Zimmerli, L., Kalde, M., Wanner, 777
G., Peck, S.C., Edwards, H., Ramonell, K., Somerville, C.R., and 778
Thordal-Christensen, H. (2004). The PEN1 syntaxin defines a novel cellular 779
compartment upon fungal attack and is required for the timely assembly of 780
papillae. Mol Biol Cell 15, 5118-5129. 781
Bargmann, B.O., and Munnik, T. (2006). The role of phospholipase D in plant 782
stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9, 515-522. 783
Beck, M., Zhou, J., Faulkner, C., MacLean, D., and Robatzek, S. (2012). 784
Spatio-temporal cellular dynamics of the Arabidopsis flagellin receptor reveal 785
activation status-dependent endosomal sorting. Plant Cell 24, 4205-4219. 786
Bhat, R.A., Miklis, M., Schmelzer, E., Schulze-Lefert, P., and Panstruga, R. 787
(2005). Recruitment and interaction dynamics of plant penetration resistance 788
components in a plasma membrane microdomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 789
30
102, 3135-3140. 790
Bozkurt, T.O., Richardson, A., Dagdas, Y.F., Mongrand, S., Kamoun, S., and 791
Raffaele, S. (2014). The plant membrane-associated REMORIN1.3 792
accumulates in discrete perihaustorial domains and enhances susceptibility 793
to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol 165, 1005-1018. 794
Clay, N.K., Adio, A.M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., and Ausubel, F.M. (2009). 795
Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innate immune 796
response. Science 323, 95-101. 797
Collins, N.C., Thordal-Christensen, H., Lipka, V., Bau, S., Kombrink, E., Qiu, J.L., 798
Huckelhoven, R., Stein, M., Freialdenhoven, A., Somerville, S.C., and 799
Schulze-Lefert, P. (2003). SNARE-protein-mediated disease resistance at 800
the plant cell wall. Nature 425, 973-977. 801
Cui, Y., Yu, M., Yao, X., Xing, J., Lin, J., and Li, X. (2018) Single-particle tracking 802
for the quantification of membrane protein dynamics in living plant cells. Mol 803
Plant 11, 1315-1327. 804
Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Yu, M., Zhu, Y., Xing, J., and Lin, J. (2019) Techniques for 805
detecting protein-protein interactions in living cells: principles, limitations, and 806
recent progress. Sci China Life Sci 62, 619-632. 807
Demir, F., Horntrich, C., Blachutzik, J.O., Scherzer, S., Reinders, Y., 808
Kierszniowska, S., Schulze, W.X., Harms, G.S., Hedrich, R., Geiger, D., and 809
31
Kreuzer, I. (2013). Arabidopsis nanodomain-delimited ABA signaling 810
pathway regulates the anion channel SLAH3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 811
8296-8301. 812
Ding, Y., Robinson, D.G., and Jiang, L. (2014). Unconventional protein secretion 813
(UPS) pathways in plants. Curr Opin in Cell Biol 29, 107-115. 814
Fan, L., Hao, H., Xue, Y., Zhang, L., Song, K., Ding, Z., Botella, M.A., Wang, H., 815
and Lin, J. (2013). Dynamic analysis of Arabidopsis AP2 sigma subunit 816
reveals a key role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and plant development. 817
Development 140, 3826-3837. 818
Fujiwara, M., Hamada, S., Hiratsuka, M., Fukao, Y., Kawasaki, T., and 819
Shimamoto, K. (2009). Proteome analysis of detergent-resistant membranes 820
(DRMs) associated with OsRac1-mediated innate immunity in rice. Plant Cell 821
Physiol 50, 1191-1200. 822
Gardiner, J.C., Harper, J.D., Weerakoon, N.D., Collings, D.A., Ritchie, S., Gilroy, 823
S., Cyr, R.J., and Marc, J. (2001). A 90-kD phospholipase D from tobacco 824
binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 13, 2143-2158. 825
Guo, L., Devaiah, S.P., Narasimhan, R., Pan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., and 826
Wang, X. (2012). Cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases 827
interact with phospholipase Ddelta to transduce hydrogen peroxide signals in 828
the Arabidopsis response to stress. Plant Cell 24, 2200-2212. 829
32
Hong, Y., Zhao, J., Guo, L., Kim, S.C., Deng, X., Wang, G., Zhang, G., Li, M., and 830
Wang, X (2016). Plant phospholipases D and C and their diverse functions in 831
stress responses. Prog Lipid Res 62, 55-74. 832
Jarsch, I.K., Konrad, S.S.A., Stratil, T.F., Urbanus, S.L., Szymanski, W., Braun, 833
P., Braun, K.H., and Ott, T. (2014). Plasma membranes are 834
subcompartmentalized into a plethora of coexisting and diverse 835
microdomains in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 26, 836
1698-1711. 837
Jia, Y., Tao, F., and Li, W. (2013). Lipid profiling demonstrates that suppressing 838
Arabidopsis phospholipase Ddelta retards ABA-promoted leaf senescence 839
by attenuating lipid degradation. PLoS One 8, e65687. 840
Kachroo, A., and Kachroo, P. (2009). Fatty Acid-derived signals in plant defense. 841
Annu Rev Phytopathol 47, 153-176. 842
Katagiri, T., Takahashi, S., and Shinozaki, K. (2001). Involvement of a novel 843
Arabidopsis phospholipase D, AtPLDdelta, in dehydration-inducible 844
accumulation of phosphatidic acid in stress signalling. Plant J 26, 595-605. 845
Keinath, N.F., Kierszniowska, S., Lorek, J., Bourdais, G., Kessler, S.A., 846
Shimosato-Asano, H., Grossniklaus, U., Schulze, W.X., Robatzek, S., and 847
Panstruga, R. (2010). PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular 848
pattern)-induced changes in plasma membrane compartmentalization reveal 849
33
novel components of plant immunity. J Biol Chem 285, 39140-39149. 850
Kleine-Vehn, J., Dhonukshe, P., Swarup, R., Bennett, M., and Friml, J. (2006). 851
Subcellular trafficking of the Arabidopsis auxin influx carrier AUX1 uses a 852
novel pathway distinct from PIN1. Plant Cell 18, 3171-3181. 853
Konopka, C.A., Backues, S.K., and Bednarek, S.Y. (2008). Dynamics of 854
Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein 1C and a clathrin light chain at the 855
plasma membrane. Plant Cell 20, 1363-1380. 856
Kwon, C., Bednarek, P., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2008). Secretory pathways in 857
plant immune responses. Plant Physiol 147, 1575-1583. 858
Kwon, C., Neu, C., Pajonk, S., Yun, H.S., Lipka, U., Humphry, M., Bau, S., Straus, 859
M., Kwaaitaal, M., Rampelt, H., El Kasmi, F., Jurgens, G., Parker, J., 860
Panstruga, R., Lipka, V., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2008). Co-option of a 861
default secretory pathway for plant immune responses. Nature 451, 835-840. 862
Laxalt, A.M., and Munnik, T. (2002). Phospholipid signalling in plant defence. Curr 863
Opin Plant Biol 5, 332-338. 864
Li, R., Liu, P., Wan, Y., Chen, T., Wang, Q., Mettbach, U., Baluska, F., Samaj, J., 865
Fang, X., Lucas, W.J., and Lin, J. (2012). A membrane 866
microdomain-associated protein, Arabidopsis Flot1, is involved in a 867
clathrin-independent endocytic pathway and is required for seedling 868
development. Plant Cell 24, 2105-2122. 869
34
Li, W., Li, M., Zhang, W., Welti, R., and Wang, X. (2004). The plasma 870
membrane-bound phospholipase Ddelta enhances freezing tolerance in 871
Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 22, 427-433. 872
Li, X., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Li, R., He, Q., Fang, X., Luu, D.T., Maurel, C., and Lin, 873
J. (2011). Single-molecule analysis of PIP2;1 dynamics and partitioning 874
reveals multiple modes of Arabidopsis plasma membrane aquaporin 875
regulation. Plant Cell 23, 3780-3797. 876
Lipka, U., Fuchs, R., and Lipka, V. (2008). Arabidopsis non-host resistance to 877
powdery mildews. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11, 404-411. 878
Lipka, V., Dittgen, J., Bednarek, P., Bhat, R., Wiermer, M., Stein, M., Landtag, J., 879
Brandt, W., Rosahl, S., Scheel, D., Llorente, F., Molina, A., Parker, J., 880
Somerville, S., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2005). Pre- and postinvasion 881
defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310, 882
1180-1183. 883
Liu, Y., Su, Y., and Wang, X. (2013). Phosphatidic acid-mediated signaling. Adv 884
Exp Med Biol 991, 159-176. 885
Luo, N., Yan, A., and Yang, Z. (2016). Measuring exocytosis rate using corrected 886
fluorescence recovery after photoconversion. Traffic 17, 554-564. 887
Martinez-Garcia, J.F., Monte, E., and Quail, P.H. (1999). A simple, rapid and 888
quantitative method for preparing Arabidopsis protein extracts for 889
35
immunoblot analysis. Plant J 20, 251-257. 890
Mishra, G., Zhang, W., Deng, F., Zhao, J., and Wang, X. (2006). A bifurcating 891
pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closure and opening in 892
Arabidopsis. Science 312, 264-266. 893
Nielsen, M.E., Feechan, A., Bohlenius, H., Ueda, T., and Thordal-Christensen, H. 894
(2012). Arabidopsis ARF-GTP exchange factor, GNOM, mediates transport 895
required for innate immunity and focal accumulation of syntaxin PEN1. Proc 896
Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 11443-11448. 897
Novák, D., Vadovič, P., Ovečka, M., Šamajová, O., Komis, G,, Colcombet, J., and 898
Šamaj, J. (2018). Gene expression pattern and protein localization of 899
Arabidopsis phospholipase D alpha 1 revealed by advanced light-sheet and 900
super-resolution microscopy. Front Plant Sci 9, 371. 901
Pinosa, F., Buhot, N., Kwaaitaal, M., Fahlberg, P., Thordal-Christensen, H., 902
Ellerstrom, M., and Andersson, M.X. (2013). Arabidopsis phospholipase 903
Ddelta is involved in basal defense and nonhost resistance to powdery 904
mildew fungi. Plant Physiol 163, 896-906. 905
Pleskot, R., Li, J., Zarsky, V., Potocky, M., and Staiger, C.J. (2013). Regulation of 906
cytoskeletal dynamics by phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid. Trends 907
Plant Sci 18, 496-504. 908
Rentel, M.C., Lecourieux, D., Ouaked, F., Usher, S.L., Petersen, L., Okamoto, H., 909
36
Knight, H., Peck, S.C., Grierson, C.S., Hirt, H., and Knight, M.R. (2004). 910
OXI1 kinase is necessary for oxidative burst-mediated signalling in 911
Arabidopsis. Nature 427, 858-861. 912
Rizzo, M.A., Shome, K., Watkins, S.C., and Romero, G. (2000). The recruitment 913
of Raf-1 to membranes is mediated by direct interaction with phosphatidic 914
acid and is independent of association with Ras. J Biol Chem 275, 915
23911-23918. 916
Serino, G., and Deng, X.W. (2007). Protein coimmunoprecipitation in Arabidopsis. 917
CSH Protoc 2007, pdb prot4683. 918
Shahollari, B., Varma, A., and Oelmuller, R. (2005). Expression of a receptor 919
kinase in Arabidopsis roots is stimulated by the basidiomycete 920
Piriformospora indica and the protein accumulates in Triton X-100 insoluble 921
plasma membrane microdomains. J Plant Physiol 162, 945-958. 922
Stanislas, T., Bouyssie, D., Rossignol, M., Vesa, S., Fromentin, J., Morel, J., 923
Pichereaux, C., Monsarrat, B., and Simon-Plas, F. (2009). Quantitative 924
proteomics reveals a dynamic association of proteins to detergent-resistant 925
membranes upon elicitor signaling in tobacco. Mol Cell Proteomics 8, 926
2186-2198. 927
Stein, M., Dittgen, J., Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., Hou, B.H., Molina, A., 928
Schulze-Lefert, P., Lipka, V., and Somerville, S. (2006). Arabidopsis 929
37
PEN3/PDR8, an ATP binding cassette transporter, contributes to nonhost 930
resistance to inappropriate pathogens that enter by direct penetration. Plant 931
Cell 18, 731-746. 932
Takáč, T., Novák, D., and Šamaj, J. (2019). Recent advances in the cellular and 933
developmental biology of phospholipases in plants. Front Plant Sci 10, 362. 934
Testerink, C., and Munnik, T. (2011). Molecular, cellular, and physiological 935
responses to phosphatidic acid formation in plants. J Exp Bot 62, 2349-2361. 936
Underwood, W., and Somerville, S.C. (2013). Perception of conserved pathogen 937
elicitors at the plasma membrane leads to relocalization of the Arabidopsis 938
PEN3 transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 12492-12497. 939
Wang, C., and Wang, X. (2001). A novel phospholipase D of Arabidopsis that is 940
activated by oleic acid and associated with the plasma membrane. Plant 941
Physiol 127, 1102-1112. 942
Wang, L., Li, H., Lv, X., Chen, T., Li, R., Xue, Y., Jiang, J., Jin, B., Baluska, F., 943
Samaj, J., Wang, X., and Lin, J. (2015). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the 944
BRI1 receptor and its regulation by membrane microdomains in living 945
Arabidopsis cells. Mol Plant 8, 1334-1349. 946
Wang, L., Xue, Y., Xing, J., Song, K., and Lin, J. (2018) Exploring the 947
spatiotemporal organization of membrane proteins in living plant Cells. Annu 948
Rev Plant Biol 69, 525-551. 949
38
Wang, Q., Zhao, Y., Luo, W., Li, R., He, Q., Fang, X., Michele, R.D., Ast, C., von 950
Wiren, N., and Lin, J. (2013). Single-particle analysis reveals shutoff control 951
of the Arabidopsis ammonium transporter AMT1;3 by clustering and 952
internalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 13204-13209. 953
Wang, X., and Chapman, K.D. (2013). Lipid signaling in plants. Front Plant Sci 4, 954
216. 955
Wang, X., Devaiah, S.P., Zhang, W., and Welti, R. (2006). Signaling functions of 956
phosphatidic acid. Prog Lipid Res 45, 250-278. 957
Wang, X., Li, X., Deng, X., Luu, D.T., Maurel, C., and Lin, J. (2015). 958
Single-molecule fluorescence imaging to quantify membrane protein 959
dynamics and oligomerization in living plant cells. Nat Protoc 10, 2054-2063. 960
Welti, R., Li, W., Li, M., Sang, Y., Biesiada, H., Zhou, H.E., Rajashekar, C.B., 961
Williams, T.D., and Wang, X. (2002). Profiling membrane lipids in plant stress 962
responses. Role of phospholipase D alpha in freezing-induced lipid changes 963
in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 277, 31994-2002. 964
Wu W, Zhu X, Song C. (2019). Single-molecule technique: a revolutionary 965
approach to exploring fundamental questions in plant science. New Phytol 966
223, 508-510. 967
Wu, Y., Eghbali, M., Ou, J., Lu, R., Toro, L., and Stefani, E. (2010). Quantitative 968
determination of spatial protein-protein correlations in fluorescence confocal 969
39
microscopy. Biophys J 98, 493-504. 970
Xiao, Z., Ma, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Z., Lai, B., Liao, J., Yue, J., and Fang, X. (2008). 971
Single-molecule study of lateral mobility of epidermal growth factor receptor 972
2/HER2 on activation. J Phys Chem B 112, 4140-4145. 973
Xue Y, Xing J, Wan Y, Lv X, Fan L, Zhang Y, Song K, Wang L, Wang X, Deng X, 974
Baluška F, Christie JM, and Lin J. (2018). Arabidopsis blue light receptor 975
phototropin 1 undergoes blue light-induced activation in membrane 976
microdomains. Mol Plant 11, 846-859. 977
Young, S.A., Wang, X., and Leach, J.E. (1996). Changes in the plasma 978
membrane distribution of rice phospholipase D during resistant interactions 979
with Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae. Plant Cell 8, 1079-1090. 980
Zhang, L., Xing, J., and Lin, J. (2019) At the intersection of exocytosis and 981
endocytosis in plants. New Phytol doi: 10.1111/nph.16018. 982
Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Liu, P., Hao, H., Jin, J.B., and Lin, J. (2011). Arabidopsis 983
R-SNARE proteins VAMP721 and VAMP722 are required for cell plate 984
formation. PLoS One 6, e26129. 985
Zhang, Q., Berkey, R., Blakeslee, J.J., Lin, J., Ma, X., King, H., Liddle, A., Guo, L., 986
Munnik, T., Wang, X., and Xiao, S (2018). Arabidopsis phospholipase Dα1 987
and Dδ oppositely modulate EDS1- and SA-independent basal resistance 988
against adapted powdery mildew. J Exp Bot 69, 3675-3688. 989
40
Zhang, W., Wang, C., Qin, C., Wood, T., Olafsdottir, G., Welti, R., and Wang, X. 990
(2003). The oleate-stimulated phospholipase D, PLDdelta, and phosphatidic 991
acid decrease H2O2-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 992
2285-2295. 993
Zinchuk, V., Wu, Y., and Grossenbacher-Zinchuk, O. (2013). Bridging the gap 994
between qualitative and quantitative colocalization results in fluorescence 995
microscopy studies. Sci Rep 3, 1365. 996
997
Figure 1. The Subcellular Localization of PLDδ-GFP Following Bgh Infection. (A–B)
Fluorescence (A) and fluorescence merged with bright-field (B) images showing that PLDδ-
GFP is localized at the epidermal cell membrane of the control Arabidopsis leaves. (C–D)
Fluorescence (C) and fluorescence merged with bright-field (D) images demonstrating the
localization of PLDδ-GFP at the Bgh penetration sites. The white arrowheads indicate the
accumulation of PLDδ-GFP. (E–G) Plasmolysis upon Bgh infection showed the focal
accumulation (arrowhead) of PLDδ-GFP in the papillae of the periplasmic space. The
fluorescence image (E) is merged with the bright-field image (F) in (G). (H–K) The focal
accumulation of PLDδ-GFP (H) overlaps completely (J) with the FM4-64-stained papillae (I) at
48 hpi with Bgh. (K) Bright-field image of the papillae in (H–J). Scale bars: 10 μm in each panel.
Figure 2. Density and Dynamics of PLDδ-GFP at the Plasma Membrane. (A) Live-cell
imaging of leaf epidermal cells expressing PLDδ-GFP, with the numbers indicating the detection
areas for FCS analysis. (B) FCS analysis determined the differences in PLDδ-GFP density at
the plasma membrane following treatment with chitin or CHX plus chitin (n = 50, 96, and 74
measurements for the control, chitin, and CHX plus chitin, respectively, from 12 seedlings for
each condition. ***P < 0.001, ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test). (C) Immunoblot analysis
showed the abundance of PLDδ-GFP in total proteins and membrane proteins in response to
chitin or CHX + chitin treatment. Actin and CBB (Coomassie Brilliant Blue) were used as the
internal controls. (D–E) Distribution of PLDδ-GFP particle fluorescence on the plasma
membrane in the control (D) or chitin-treated cells (E) shown by pseudocolor images (blue-
yellow-red palette). (F) FRAP time course of PLDδ-GFP with or without chitin treatment. White
squares indicate bleached regions. (G) Fluorescence recovery curves of the photobleached
region of interest. (H) Exocytosis rates of PLDδ-GFP with or without chitin treatment. *P < 0.05,
Student’s t-test. Bars represent means, error bars represent standard error (SE). Scale bars:
10 μm in A and F, 3 μm in D–E.
Figure 3. Localization of PLDδ-GFP in Plasma Membrane Microdomains. (A–D)
Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and AtREM1.3-mCherry (B) in the papillae, with merged (C)
and bright-field (D) images. (E–G) Live-cell imaging of leaf epidermal cells expressing PLDδ-
GFP (E), AtREM1.3-mCherry (F) and the merged image (G) in the control conditions. (H–I)
Protein proximity index between PLDδ-GFP and AtREM1.3-mCherry with or without chitin
treatment (n=10, with 15 regions of interest in the control condition and 30 in the chitin
treatment). (J–M) Live-cell imaging (using confocal microscopy) of fluorescence lifetime
distribution of PLDδ-GFP in the plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone (J), coexpressing Free-
GFP/ AtREM1.3-mCherry (K) and co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/AtREM1.3-mCherry. L and M
indicate the fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP with (L) or without chitin treatment (M).
AtREM1.3 is a marker of membrane microdomains. (N) FRET-FLIM analysis revealed the
fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP (n = 12, with 15 regions of interest in the plants expressing
PLDδ-GFP alone and 15 regions in the plants co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/AtREM1.3-mCherry
under control conditions and 19 under chitin treatment). Bars represent means, error bars in all
panels represent SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test in H; ANOVA and
post-hoc Tukey’s test in K). Scale bars: 10 μm in A–G, 2 μm in J–M.
Figure 4. Effect of BFA on the Exocytosis and Accumulation of PLDδ. (A–H) Subcellular
localization of PLDδ in the presence of the vesicle-trafficking inhibitor BFA with (D–F) or without
chitin treatment (A–C). Costaining with FM4-64 (B, E) highlights the plasma membrane and
BFA bodies. White arrowheads indicate BFA-resistant vesicles, and the magenta arrowheads
indicate BFA bodies. G and H show the quantitation of BFA bodies (G) and BFA-resistant
vesicles of PLDδ-GFP (H). For each experiment, at least 30 epidermal cells from 4 seedlings
were scored (n = 3). (I–J) FRAP time course of PLDδ-GFP with BFA pretreatment and chitin
treatment. The white rectangle indicates the bleached region (I). The initial bleached region
was further subdivided into three sectors, indicated by the green, red, and blue rectangles (J).
(K) Fluorescence recovery curves of the photobleached region of interest. (L) Fluorescence
recovery curves of divided regions of interest. Curves represent the best fits of mean values of
six independent FRAP experiments on PLDδ-GFP. (M) Exocytosis rates of PLDδ-GFP with or
without BFA treatment. (N–P) Accumulation of PLDδ-GFP at sites of Bgh attempted penetration
with (O) or without pretreatment with BFA (N). Arrowheads indicate the Bgh attempted
penetration sites. For each leaf, at least 49 germinated spores were scored (n = 3). Bars
represent means, error bars in all panels represent SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, Student’s t-
test. Scale bars: 20 μm in A–F and N–O; 10 μm in I; 5 μm in J.
Figure 5. Colocalization and Interaction Analysis of PLDδ with PEN1 in Living Plant Cells.
(A–D) Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and mCherry-PEN1 (B) in the papillae, with the merged
(C) and bright-field (D) images. (E–H) Live-cell imaging (using confocal microscopy) of
fluorescence lifetime distribution of PLDδ-GFP in the plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone (E),
coexpressing Free-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 (F) and co-expressing PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 (G–
H). G and H indicate the fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP with (H) or without chitin treatment
(G). (I) FRET-FLIM analysis revealed the change in the fluorescence lifetime of PLDδ-GFP (n
= 10, with 15 regions of interest in the plants expressing PLDδ-GFP alone and in the plants co-
expressing PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 under both control condition and chitin treatment). (J)
Co-immunoprecipitation of PEN1 with PLDδ in transgenic Arabidopsis. Total protein extracts
from PLDδ-GFP and PLDδ-GFP/mCherry-PEN1 transgenic plants were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with anti-GFP. IP proteins were detected by immunoblotting with anti-mCherry antibody.
Bars represent means, error bars in I represent SD. ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test for I. *P
< 0.05. Scale bar: 10 μm in A–D; 2 μm in E–H.
Figure 6. PLDδ is Trafficked to the Papillae Via VAMP721/722-mediated Secretion in
Response to Chitin. (A–D) Colocalization of PLDδ-GFP (A) and mCherry-VAMP721 (B) in the
papillae at the Bgh infection sites, with the merged (C) and bright-field (D) images. (E–J)
Colocalization (G, J) of PLDδ-GFP (E, H) and mCherry-VAMP721 (F, I) in the cytoplasm under
control conditions (E–G) or chitin treatment (H–J). Arrowheads indicate the cytoplasmic bodies
labeled by GFP or mCherry. (K–N) Fluorescence images demonstrating the accumulation of
PLDδ-GFP at the penetration sites of Bgh in PLDδ-GFP vamp721-/- plants (K), PLDδ-GFP
vamp722-/- plants (L), in PLDδ-GFP vamp721+/- vamp722-/- (M) and PLDδ-GFP vamp721-/-
vamp722+/- plants (N). The white arrowheads in K–N indicate the accumulation of PLDδ-GFP.
(O) The number of foci were enumerated for at least 49 germinated spores per leaf for six
leaves per genotype (n = 6). Bars represent means, error bars in all panels represent SD.
ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test for O, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bar: 10 μm in A–N.
Figure 7. PA levels, ROS accumulation, and Defense-related Gene Expression in the
Absence of PLDδ and the SNARE Complex in Response to Pathogen Stimuli. (A–D) Focal
accumulation of PLDδ-GFP (A) and a fluorescent phosphatidic acid (PA) biosensor (B) in the
papillae at the Bgh entry site, with bright-field (C) and merged (D) images. The PA sensor is the
PA-binding domain of the yeast SNARE Spo20p fused to the fluorescent protein mCherry. (E)
Total PA in Col-0, pldδ, pen1, vamp721-/-, and vamp722-/- plants measured by mass
spectrometry under chitin treatment for 0, 15, and 30 min. Relative PA levels compared to WT
at time zero (control) are presented. (F) Total H2O2 in Col-0, pldδ, pen1, vamp721-/-, and
vamp722-/- plants measured by a micro hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assay kit under chitin
treatment for 0, 15, and 30 min. Relative H2O2 levels compared to WT at time zero (control) are
presented. (G–H) Expression of defense-related genes in Col-0, pldδ, pen1, vamp721-/-, and
vamp722-/- mutant plants in response to chitin. Transcript levels were normalized to ACTIN2.
Relative expression levels compared to WT at time zero (control) are presented. Data bars
represent the mean (± SD) of three repeats. The asterisk (*) in E and F indicates the statistically
significant difference in the level of PC and PE compared to respective control. Student’s t-test,
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Scale bars: 10 μm in A–D.
Parsed CitationsAbdelkafi S, and Abousalham A. (2011). The substrate specificities of sunflower and soybean phospholipases D usingtransphosphatidylation reaction. Lipids Health Dis 10, 196.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
An, Q., Huckelhoven, R., Kogel, K.H., and van Bel, A.J. (2006). Multivesicular bodies participate in a cell wall-associated defenceresponse in barley leaves attacked by the pathogenic powdery mildew fungus. Cell Microbiol 8, 1009-1019.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Assaad, F.F., Qiu, J.L., Youngs, H., Ehrhardt, D., Zimmerli, L., Kalde, M., Wanner, G., Peck, S.C., Edwards, H., Ramonell, K., Somerville,C.R., and Thordal-Christensen, H. (2004). The PEN1 syntaxin defines a novel cellular compartment upon fungal attack and is requiredfor the timely assembly of papillae. Mol Biol Cell 15, 5118-5129.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bargmann, B.O., and Munnik, T. (2006). The role of phospholipase D in plant stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9, 515-522.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Beck, M., Zhou, J., Faulkner, C., MacLean, D., and Robatzek, S. (2012). Spatio-temporal cellular dynamics of the Arabidopsis flagellinreceptor reveal activation status-dependent endosomal sorting. Plant Cell 24, 4205-4219.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bhat, R.A., Miklis, M., Schmelzer, E., Schulze-Lefert, P., and Panstruga, R. (2005). Recruitment and interaction dynamics of plantpenetration resistance components in a plasma membrane microdomain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 3135-3140.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bozkurt, T.O., Richardson, A., Dagdas, Y.F., Mongrand, S., Kamoun, S., and Raffaele, S. (2014). The plant membrane-associatedREMORIN1.3 accumulates in discrete perihaustorial domains and enhances susceptibility to Phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol 165,1005-1018.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Clay, N.K., Adio, A.M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., and Ausubel, F.M. (2009). Glucosinolate metabolites required for an Arabidopsis innateimmune response. Science 323, 95-101.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Collins, N.C., Thordal-Christensen, H., Lipka, V., Bau, S., Kombrink, E., Qiu, J.L., Huckelhoven, R., Stein, M., Freialdenhoven, A.,Somerville, S.C., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2003). SNARE-protein-mediated disease resistance at the plant cell wall. Nature 425, 973-977.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cui, Y., Yu, M., Yao, X., Xing, J., Lin, J., and Li, X. (2018) Single-particle tracking for the quantification of membrane protein dynamics inliving plant cells. Mol Plant 11, 1315-1327.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cui, Y., Zhang, X., Yu, M., Zhu, Y., Xing, J., and Lin, J. (2019) Techniques for detecting protein-protein interactions in living cells:principles, limitations, and recent progress. Sci China Life Sci 62, 619-632.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Demir, F., Horntrich, C., Blachutzik, J.O., Scherzer, S., Reinders, Y., Kierszniowska, S., Schulze, W.X., Harms, G.S., Hedrich, R., Geiger,D., and Kreuzer, I. (2013). Arabidopsis nanodomain-delimited ABA signaling pathway regulates the anion channel SLAH3. Proc NatlAcad Sci U S A 110, 8296-8301.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ding, Y., Robinson, D.G., and Jiang, L. (2014). Unconventional protein secretion (UPS) pathways in plants. Curr Opin in Cell Biol 29,107-115.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fan, L., Hao, H., Xue, Y., Zhang, L., Song, K., Ding, Z., Botella, M.A., Wang, H., and Lin, J. (2013). Dynamic analysis of Arabidopsis AP2sigma subunit reveals a key role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and plant development. Development 140, 3826-3837.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fujiwara, M., Hamada, S., Hiratsuka, M., Fukao, Y., Kawasaki, T., and Shimamoto, K. (2009). Proteome analysis of detergent-resistantmembranes (DRMs) associated with OsRac1-mediated innate immunity in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 50, 1191-1200.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gardiner, J.C., Harper, J.D., Weerakoon, N.D., Collings, D.A., Ritchie, S., Gilroy, S., Cyr, R.J., and Marc, J. (2001). A 90-kD phospholipaseD from tobacco binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 13, 2143-2158.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Guo, L., Devaiah, S.P., Narasimhan, R., Pan, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., and Wang, X. (2012). Cytosolic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenases interact with phospholipase Ddelta to transduce hydrogen peroxide signals in the Arabidopsis response to stress.Plant Cell 24, 2200-2212.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hong, Y., Zhao, J., Guo, L., Kim, S.C., Deng, X., Wang, G., Zhang, G., Li, M., and Wang, X (2016). Plant phospholipases D and C and theirdiverse functions in stress responses. Prog Lipid Res 62, 55-74.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jarsch, I.K., Konrad, S.S.A., Stratil, T.F., Urbanus, S.L., Szymanski, W., Braun, P., Braun, K.H., and Ott, T. (2014). Plasma membranes aresubcompartmentalized into a plethora of coexisting and diverse microdomains in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell26, 1698-1711.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jia, Y., Tao, F., and Li, W. (2013). Lipid profiling demonstrates that suppressing Arabidopsis phospholipase Ddelta retards ABA-promoted leaf senescence by attenuating lipid degradation. PLoS One 8, e65687.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kachroo, A., and Kachroo, P. (2009). Fatty Acid-derived signals in plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47, 153-176.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Katagiri, T., Takahashi, S., and Shinozaki, K. (2001). Involvement of a novel Arabidopsis phospholipase D, AtPLDdelta, in dehydration-inducible accumulation of phosphatidic acid in stress signalling. Plant J 26, 595-605.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Keinath, N.F., Kierszniowska, S., Lorek, J., Bourdais, G., Kessler, S.A., Shimosato-Asano, H., Grossniklaus, U., Schulze, W.X., Robatzek,S., and Panstruga, R. (2010). PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern)-induced changes in plasma membranecompartmentalization reveal novel components of plant immunity. J Biol Chem 285, 39140-39149.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kleine-Vehn, J., Dhonukshe, P., Swarup, R., Bennett, M., and Friml, J. (2006). Subcellular trafficking of the Arabidopsis auxin influxcarrier AUX1 uses a novel pathway distinct from PIN1. Plant Cell 18, 3171-3181.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Konopka, C.A., Backues, S.K., and Bednarek, S.Y. (2008). Dynamics of Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein 1C and a clathrin light chainat the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 20, 1363-1380.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kwon, C., Bednarek, P., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2008). Secretory pathways in plant immune responses. Plant Physiol 147, 1575-1583.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kwon, C., Neu, C., Pajonk, S., Yun, H.S., Lipka, U., Humphry, M., Bau, S., Straus, M., Kwaaitaal, M., Rampelt, H., El Kasmi, F., Jurgens,G., Parker, J., Panstruga, R., Lipka, V., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2008). Co-option of a default secretory pathway for plant immuneresponses. Nature 451, 835-840.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Laxalt, A.M., and Munnik, T. (2002). Phospholipid signalling in plant defence. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5, 332-338.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, R., Liu, P., Wan, Y., Chen, T., Wang, Q., Mettbach, U., Baluska, F., Samaj, J., Fang, X., Lucas, W.J., and Lin, J. (2012). A membranemicrodomain-associated protein, Arabidopsis Flot1, is involved in a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway and is required forseedling development. Plant Cell 24, 2105-2122.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, W., Li, M., Zhang, W., Welti, R., and Wang, X. (2004). The plasma membrane-bound phospholipase Ddelta enhances freezingtolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 22, 427-433.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li, X., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Li, R., He, Q., Fang, X., Luu, D.T., Maurel, C., and Lin, J. (2011). Single-molecule analysis of PIP2;1 dynamicsand partitioning reveals multiple modes of Arabidopsis plasma membrane aquaporin regulation. Plant Cell 23, 3780-3797.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lipka, U., Fuchs, R., and Lipka, V. (2008). Arabidopsis non-host resistance to powdery mildews. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11, 404-411.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lipka, V., Dittgen, J., Bednarek, P., Bhat, R., Wiermer, M., Stein, M., Landtag, J., Brandt, W., Rosahl, S., Scheel, D., Llorente, F., Molina,A., Parker, J., Somerville, S., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2005). Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance inArabidopsis. Science 310, 1180-1183.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu, Y., Su, Y., and Wang, X. (2013). Phosphatidic acid-mediated signaling. Adv Exp Med Biol 991, 159-176.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Luo, N., Yan, A., and Yang, Z. (2016). Measuring exocytosis rate using corrected fluorescence recovery after photoconversion. Traffic17, 554-564.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Martinez-Garcia, J.F., Monte, E., and Quail, P.H. (1999). A simple, rapid and quantitative method for preparing Arabidopsis proteinextracts for immunoblot analysis. Plant J 20, 251-257.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mishra, G., Zhang, W., Deng, F., Zhao, J., and Wang, X. (2006). A bifurcating pathway directs abscisic acid effects on stomatal closureand opening in Arabidopsis. Science 312, 264-266.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Nielsen, M.E., Feechan, A., Bohlenius, H., Ueda, T., and Thordal-Christensen, H. (2012). Arabidopsis ARF-GTP exchange factor, GNOM,mediates transport required for innate immunity and focal accumulation of syntaxin PEN1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 11443-11448.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Novák, D., Vadovič, P., Ovečka, M., Šamajová, O., Komis, G,, Colcombet, J., and Šamaj, J. (2018). Gene expression pattern and proteinlocalization of Arabidopsis phospholipase D alpha 1 revealed by advanced light-sheet and super-resolution microscopy. Front PlantSci 9, 371.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pinosa, F., Buhot, N., Kwaaitaal, M., Fahlberg, P., Thordal-Christensen, H., Ellerstrom, M., and Andersson, M.X. (2013). Arabidopsisphospholipase Ddelta is involved in basal defense and nonhost resistance to powdery mildew fungi. Plant Physiol 163, 896-906.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pleskot, R., Li, J., Zarsky, V., Potocky, M., and Staiger, C.J. (2013). Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics by phospholipase D andphosphatidic acid. Trends Plant Sci 18, 496-504.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rentel, M.C., Lecourieux, D., Ouaked, F., Usher, S.L., Petersen, L., Okamoto, H., Knight, H., Peck, S.C., Grierson, C.S., Hirt, H., andKnight, M.R. (2004). OXI1 kinase is necessary for oxidative burst-mediated signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 427, 858-861.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rizzo, M.A., Shome, K., Watkins, S.C., and Romero, G. (2000). The recruitment of Raf-1 to membranes is mediated by direct interactionwith phosphatidic acid and is independent of association with Ras. J Biol Chem 275, 23911-23918.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Serino, G., and Deng, X.W. (2007). Protein coimmunoprecipitation in Arabidopsis. CSH Protoc 2007, pdb prot4683.Pubmed: Author and Title
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shahollari, B., Varma, A., and Oelmuller, R. (2005). Expression of a receptor kinase in Arabidopsis roots is stimulated by thebasidiomycete Piriformospora indica and the protein accumulates in Triton X-100 insoluble plasma membrane microdomains. J PlantPhysiol 162, 945-958.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Stanislas, T., Bouyssie, D., Rossignol, M., Vesa, S., Fromentin, J., Morel, J., Pichereaux, C., Monsarrat, B., and Simon-Plas, F. (2009).Quantitative proteomics reveals a dynamic association of proteins to detergent-resistant membranes upon elicitor signaling intobacco. Mol Cell Proteomics 8, 2186-2198.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Stein, M., Dittgen, J., Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., Hou, B.H., Molina, A., Schulze-Lefert, P., Lipka, V., and Somerville, S. (2006). ArabidopsisPEN3/PDR8, an ATP binding cassette transporter, contributes to nonhost resistance to inappropriate pathogens that enter by directpenetration. Plant Cell 18, 731-746.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Takáč, T., Novák, D., and Šamaj, J. (2019). Recent advances in the cellular and developmental biology of phospholipases in plants.Front Plant Sci 10, 362.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Testerink, C., and Munnik, T. (2011). Molecular, cellular, and physiological responses to phosphatidic acid formation in plants. J ExpBot 62, 2349-2361.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Underwood, W., and Somerville, S.C. (2013). Perception of conserved pathogen elicitors at the plasma membrane leads torelocalization of the Arabidopsis PEN3 transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 12492-12497.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, C., and Wang, X. (2001). A novel phospholipase D of Arabidopsis that is activated by oleic acid and associated with the plasmamembrane. Plant Physiol 127, 1102-1112.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, L., Li, H., Lv, X., Chen, T., Li, R., Xue, Y., Jiang, J., Jin, B., Baluska, F., Samaj, J., Wang, X., and Lin, J. (2015). Spatiotemporaldynamics of the BRI1 receptor and its regulation by membrane microdomains in living Arabidopsis cells. Mol Plant 8, 1334-1349.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, L., Xue, Y., Xing, J., Song, K., and Lin, J. (2018) Exploring the spatiotemporal organization of membrane proteins in living plantCells. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69, 525-551.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, Q., Zhao, Y., Luo, W., Li, R., He, Q., Fang, X., Michele, R.D., Ast, C., von Wiren, N., and Lin, J. (2013). Single-particle analysisreveals shutoff control of the Arabidopsis ammonium transporter AMT1;3 by clustering and internalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A110, 13204-13209.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, X., and Chapman, K.D. (2013). Lipid signaling in plants. Front Plant Sci 4, 216.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, X., Devaiah, S.P., Zhang, W., and Welti, R. (2006). Signaling functions of phosphatidic acid. Prog Lipid Res 45, 250-278.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang, X., Li, X., Deng, X., Luu, D.T., Maurel, C., and Lin, J. (2015). Single-molecule fluorescence imaging to quantify membrane proteindynamics and oligomerization in living plant cells. Nat Protoc 10, 2054-2063.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Welti, R., Li, W., Li, M., Sang, Y., Biesiada, H., Zhou, H.E., Rajashekar, C.B., Williams, T.D., and Wang, X. (2002). Profiling membrane lipidsin plant stress responses. Role of phospholipase D alpha in freezing-induced lipid changes in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 277, 31994-2002.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu W, Zhu X, Song C. (2019). Single-molecule technique: a revolutionary approach to exploring fundamental questions in plantscience. New Phytol 223, 508-510.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wu, Y., Eghbali, M., Ou, J., Lu, R., Toro, L., and Stefani, E. (2010). Quantitative determination of spatial protein-protein correlations influorescence confocal microscopy. Biophys J 98, 493-504.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xiao, Z., Ma, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Z., Lai, B., Liao, J., Yue, J., and Fang, X. (2008). Single-molecule study of lateral mobility of epidermalgrowth factor receptor 2/HER2 on activation. J Phys Chem B 112, 4140-4145.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xue Y, Xing J, Wan Y, Lv X, Fan L, Zhang Y, Song K, Wang L, Wang X, Deng X, Baluška F, Christie JM, and Lin J. (2018). Arabidopsisblue light receptor phototropin 1 undergoes blue light-induced activation in membrane microdomains. Mol Plant 11, 846-859.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Young, S.A., Wang, X., and Leach, J.E. (1996). Changes in the plasma membrane distribution of rice phospholipase D during resistantinteractions with Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae. Plant Cell 8, 1079-1090.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, L., Xing, J., and Lin, J. (2019) At the intersection of exocytosis and endocytosis in plants. New Phytol doi: 10.1111/nph.16018.Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Liu, P., Hao, H., Jin, J.B., and Lin, J. (2011). Arabidopsis R-SNARE proteins VAMP721 and VAMP722 are required forcell plate formation. PLoS One 6, e26129.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, Q., Berkey, R., Blakeslee, J.J., Lin, J., Ma, X., King, H., Liddle, A., Guo, L., Munnik, T., Wang, X., and Xiao, S (2018). Arabidopsisphospholipase Dα1 and Dδ oppositely modulate EDS1- and SA-independent basal resistance against adapted powdery mildew. J ExpBot 69, 3675-3688.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang, W., Wang, C., Qin, C., Wood, T., Olafsdottir, G., Welti, R., and Wang, X. (2003). The oleate-stimulated phospholipase D, PLDdelta,and phosphatidic acid decrease H2O2-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 2285-2295.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zinchuk, V., Wu, Y., and Grossenbacher-Zinchuk, O. (2013). Bridging the gap between qualitative and quantitative colocalization resultsin fluorescence microscopy studies. Sci Rep 3, 1365.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
DOI 10.1105/tpc.19.00534; originally published online October 9, 2019;Plant Cell
Shen, Frantisek Baluska, Jozef Samaj and Jinxing LinJingjing Xing, Xiaojuan Li, Xiaohua Wang, Xueqin Lv, Li Wang, Liang Zhang, Yingfang Zhu, Qian-Hua
Functions as a Regulatory Mechanism in Plant Innate ImmunityδSecretion of Phospholipase D
This information is current as of December 3, 2020
Supplemental Data /content/suppl/2019/11/09/tpc.19.00534.DC2.html /content/suppl/2019/10/09/tpc.19.00534.DC1.html
Permissions https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for eTOCs at:
CiteTrack Alerts http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
Subscription Information http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
is available at:Plant Physiology and The Plant CellSubscription Information for
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY © American Society of Plant Biologists