Upload
others
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Normal Shocks -1
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Normal Shock Waves
• For a normal shock
– wave is perpendicular to
flow (propagation) direction
• Shock is nonequilibrium process
internally, but assume
– flow before shock (1) is in equilibrium
– flow after shock (2) is in equilibrium
1 2
Normal Shocks -2
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Approach to Finding Shock Properties
• Start with stationary shock (or solve problem in reference frame moving with shock)
can use steady equations
• Use control volume analysis– only need to consider properties before and after
shock (equilibrium)
• Equations first studied by Rankine (~1870) and Hugoniot (~1877)
v1
p1
1
T1
v2
p2
2
T2
1 2
2
Normal Shocks -3
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Governing Equations
• Conservation and state equations
– 1d, steady, inviscid except inside shock, adiabatic, only flow work
Mass
Momentum 112221 vv mmApAp
v1
p1
1
T1
h1
a1
v2
p2
2
T2
h2
a2
AAApAp 2
11
2
2221 vv
2211 vv A
m(V.C1)
1221 vv A
mpp
(V.C2a)
2
222
2
111 vv pp
(V.C2b)Energy
ohhh 2v2v 2
22
2
11(V.C3)
Perfect Gas
State Eqns.
RTp (tpg) dTcdh p from III.6
RTa 2 from V.A3
• 6 equations, 6 unknowns
Normal Shocks -4
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Shock Density Ratio
• Combine energy, momentum, mass
• Solve for density ratio
v1
p1
1
T1
h1
a1
v2
p2
2
T2
h2
a2
(V.C3) 2121
2
2
2
112 vvvv2
1vv
2
1 hh
1221 vv
Am
pp
(V.C2a)
21
21
vv11
A
m(V.C1)
tpg/cpg
(V.C5)1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
11
p
p
p
p
211212 112
1 pphh
(V.C4) true for all simple comp. substances
Shock Hugoniot Eq.
112212121
RpRp
RTTchh p
(III.6) (tpg)
only functions of p and
3
Normal Shocks -5
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Entropy Change Across Shock
• For tpg/cpg, entropy state equation p1
1
s1
p2
2
s2
1
2
1
212 lnln
R
T
Tcss v
1
1
2
11
22
1
1
2
1
212 lnln
p
p
T
T
c
ss
v
(V.C6)
1
2
1
212 lnp
p
c
ss
v
entropy change as function of pressure and density ratios
across shock
(tpg)
Normal Shocks -6
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Entropy Change Across Shock
• Combine s2/s1
result with 2/1
(from V.C5)
p1
1
s1
p2
2
s2
1
2
1
212 lnp
p
c
ss
v
Violates
2nd Law
solution with p2<p1
violates 2nd Law
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
(s2-s1)/cv
p2/p
1
=1.4
weak shocks
no expansion
“shocks”
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
11
p
p
p
p
4
Normal Shocks -7
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Number Relations: v,
• General problem is to find change in
all properties across shock
• Start by finding changes based on
M1, M2
– then find M2 as function of M1
• Velocity ratio, v2/v1
• Density ratio, 2/ 1
11
22
1
2
v
v
aM
aM
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
(V.C7)
1
2
1
2
1
2
v
v
T
T
M
M
2211 vv mass2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
v
v
T
T
M
M
(V.C8)
Normal Shocks -8
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Number Relations: T
• Temperature ratio, T2/T1
(V.C9)
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
11
2
11
M
M
T
T
2121 oooo TThh energy
2
1
2
2
2
111
2
111
M
M
1
2
11
22
1
2
o
o
o
o
T
T
TT
TT
T
T
1
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
5
Normal Shocks -9
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Number Relations: p
• Pressure ratio, p2/p1
momentum(V.C2b)
2
222
2
111 vv pp
2
222
2
111 MppMpp
2
2
2
222v
Mp
pM
RTM
aM
2
22
2
11 11 MpMp
(V.C10) 2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
M
M
p
p
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
Normal Shocks -10
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Number Relations: M
• Mach Number, M2 =f(M1)
– combine all eqn’s.
2
12
1
12
22
2
2
2
11
12
11
1M
M
MM
M
M
1
2
2
1
v
v
mass(V.C1)
expression for M2
as function of M1 -can solve
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
p
p
M
M
mom.
(V.C9)
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
11
2
11 MM
T
T energy(V.C10)
2
1
22
11
v
v
RTM
RTM
M and a(V.A3)
11
22
1
2
RTp
RTp
tpg
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
6
Normal Shocks -11
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Number Relations: M (con’t)
• Remove square roots by squaring
both sides, solve resulting quadratic
2
122
1
2
12
222
2
2
2
2
11
12
11
1M
M
MM
M
M
0212
111
2
21
24
2
MgMgMMgM
g(M1)
“No shock”
solution
2
12
1
2
12
2 or
11
2
1
2
M
M
M
M
(V.C11)
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
Normal Shocks -12
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Mach Change Across Normal Shock
M1 M2
11
2
1
2
2
1
2
12
2
M
M
M
in shock’s reference
frame, flow after
normal shock is
always subsonic
M1<1,
M2>1
Expansion
Shock
=1.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 1 2 3
M1
M2
7
Normal Shocks -13
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Property Ratios - Results
• p ratio increase across normal shock is greatest static property change
• and v ratios approach limit
=1.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
M1
T2/T
1,p
2/p
1,
2/
1p2/p1
T2/T1
2/1,v1/v2
• T, p and increase across shock and ratios increase withM1
• v decreases
from
(V.C5)
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
11
p
p
p
p
v1
1
T1
p1
M1
v2
2
T2
p2
M2
1
1lim
1
2
112
pp
Normal Shocks -14
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Stagnation Properties Across Shock
• Stagnation Temperature, To2=To1
• Stagnation Pressure
M1
To1
po1
o1
M2
To2
po2
o2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
11
22
1
2
2
11
2
11
p
p
M
M
p
p
pp
pp
p
p
o
o
o
o
(V.C12)
1
1
1
2 2
1
1
2
M
p
p
M2 from (V.C11)
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
M
M
p
p
from (V.C10)
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
11
2
1
M
M
M
p
p
o
o
(V.C13)
8
Normal Shocks -15
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Stagnation Pressure
• Other Useful Expressions
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
11
2
11
p
p
M
M
p
p
o
o
1
2
2
2
1
2
p
p
p
p
p
p oo
1
21
2
1
1
2
p
p
T
T
p
p
o
o
(V.C14)
1
21
2
2
1
2
2
11
p
pM
p
po
(V.C15)
M1
To1
po1
o1
M2
To2
po2
o2
Normal Shocks -16
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Stagnation Properties (con’t)
• Stagnation Density, o2/o1
• Sonic Area Ratio, A*2/A
*1
(V.C16)
1
2
1
2
o
o
o
o
p
p
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
RT
RT
p
p
tpg
M1
To1
po1
o1
A1*
M2
To2
po2
o2
A2*
from
(V.B4)
f
f
RTp
RTp
A
A
m
m
oo
oo
11
22
*
1
*
2
1
2
1 1 1
(V.C17)2
1
*
1
*
2
o
o
p
p
A
A
9
Normal Shocks -17
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Stag. Press., Entropy and A* - Results
• Stagnation pressure and stagnation density drop
• Entropy increases
• Sonic areaincreases
– larger throat required after shock to reach sonic flow (same mass flowrate, lower po)
M1
po1
o1
A1*
M2
po2
o2
A2*
=1.4
0
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
M1
po
2/p
01,(
s2-s
1)/
R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
A*2
/A*1
po2/po1=o2/o1
(s2-s1)/R
A*2/A
*1
opAm *
Normal Shocks -18
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Examples: Problem 1
• Given: Air flowing through constant area duct encounters stationary shock
– oncoming air 500 m/s,50 kPa, 250K
• Find:
– M2, T2, p2, v2
– po2 , To2 (relative to shock/duct)
• Assume: air is tpg/cpg with =1.4
1 2v1=500 m/sp1=50 kPaT1=250 K
10
Normal Shocks -19
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Solution: Problem 1• Analysis:
– first calculate M1
– can use equations or tables (e.g., App. B for =1.4)
1 2v1=500 m/sp1=50 kPaT1=250 K
58.125020
500v11
sm
sm
RTM
M1 M2 p2/p1 T2/T1 po2/po1 r2 /r1 A*2/A
*1 po2/p1
1.50 0.7011 2.458 1.320 0.9298 1.862 1.076 3.413
1.51 0.6976 2.493 1.327 0.9266 1.879 1.079 3.451
1.52 0.6941 2.529 1.334 0.9233 1.896 1.083 3.489
1.53 0.6907 2.564 1.340 0.9200 1.913 1.087 3.528
1.54 0.6874 2.600 1.347 0.9166 1.930 1.091 3.567
1.55 0.6841 2.636 1.354 0.9132 1.947 1.095 3.606
1.56 0.6809 2.673 1.361 0.9097 1.964 1.099 3.645
1.57 0.6777 2.709 1.367 0.9062 1.981 1.104 3.685
1.58 0.6746 2.746 1.374 0.9026 1.998 1.108 3.724
1.59 0.6715 2.783 1.381 0.8989 2.015 1.112 3.765
Normal Shocks -20
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Solution: Problem 1 (con’t.)
• Analysis (con’t):1 2
v1=500 m/sp1=50 kPaT1=250 K
58.11 M
158.1
14.1
)4.1(2
14.1
258.1 222
2M– M2:V.C11
– T2: V.C9 374.1675.02
14.1158.1
2
14.11 22
1
2
T
T
– p2: V.C12 746.214.1
14.158.1
14.1
4.12 2
1
2
p
p
– v2: V.C7 998.1374.11675.058.1v
v
1
2
2
1
– To2: V.A5 KKTT oo 667.025058.12
14.11250 2
12
– po2:V.C15 724.3746.2675.02
14.11
5.3
2
1
2
p
po
M2=0.675
T2=344 K
p2=137 kPa
v2=250 m/s
To2=375 K
po2=186 kPapo1=206 kPaV.A6
11
Normal Shocks -21
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Examples: Problem 2
• Given: Diverging nozzle with exit/inlet area ratio of 4.0– normal shock stands
at entrance
– just before entranceHe, Mach 2.2 withstagnation pressureof 101.3 kPa
• Find:1. Mach number at nozzle exit
2. (static) pressure at exit
• Assume: He is tpg/cpg, =5/3 for T range (unknown)
1 2M=2.2po=101.3 kPa
i
eAe/Ai=4.0
Mepe
Normal Shocks -22
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Solution: Problem 2
• Analysis:
– Me
– pe:
1 2M=2.2po=101.3 kPa
i
eAe/Ai =4.0
Mepe
– but need M2
M1=Mi 2.2
0.4
2
*
*
Mi
Me
i
e
AA
AA
A
Ae
80.420.14
988.03.101686.0 kPape pe=68.7 kPa
118.0
1
1
2
eMo
o
o
o
oe
eoee
p
pp
p
p
p
ppp
V.C13 V.A6
581.0
**4
A
A
A
A i
M
e
e
get from area ratio
isentropic2e
V.B2,A6
M A/A* p/po
0.118 4.799 0.9884
0.581 1.198 0.0906
3.732 4.799 0.0132V.B2
V.C11
M1 M2 po2/po1
2.20 0.5813 0.6860
solutions of
V.C11,13M2=0.581
73.3
118.0eM
12
Normal Shocks -23
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Examples: Problem 3
• Given: Two engine inlets, one astraight tube, the other a converging-diverging diffuser
– both with M2.0 at their inlets, Ti300.K, pi0.50 atm
– both slow flow down to same Me
• CD diffuser: reversible flow• straight diffuser: with shock
• Find: compare performance of these 2 diffusers– Me, Te, pe, poe/poi
• Assumptions:
– air is cpg/tpg with =1.4
– adiabatic diffusers
– reversible in straight diffuser except at shock
MeTepe
poe/poi
1 2Mi=2.0
pi=0.50 atm
Ti=300 K
i e
i e
Normal Shocks -24
School of Aerospace Engineering
Copyright © 2001, 2018, 2020 by Jerry M. Seitzman.
All rights reserved.
AE2010
Solution: Problem 3
• Analysis: “Shock Diffuser”– =1.4, solutions of V.C8-11, 13, 17
– Me=M2=0.577
– Te=T2= (T2/T1)T1=(1.688)300K= 506 K
– pe=p2= (p2/p1)p1=(4.50)0.5atm=2.25 atm; poe/poi = po2/po1= 0.721
• “CD Diffuser” - isentropic (solutions of V.A5-6, B2)
MeTepe
poe/poi
1 2Mi=2.0
pi=0.50 atm
Ti=300 K
i e
i e
– Me=0.577
– pe= (Te/Ti)/-1pi=(506/300)3.50.5atm=3.12 atm
– poe/poi = 1
– Te= = 506 K
KT
TT
TTi
oi
oe300
556.0
938.0
0.2
577.0
same (M, To const)
higher p
no po loss higher mass flowrate or smaller area
M1 M2 p2/p1 T2/T1 2/1 po2/po1 A*2/A
*1
2.00 0.5774 4.500 1.688 2.667 0.7209 1.387
M A/A* T/To p/po
0.577 1.217 0.9376 0.7980
2.000 1.688 0.5556 0.1278