Schematic Design-Cheyenne Regional Airport

7/18/2019 Schematic Design-Cheyenne Regional Airport

1/33

Schematic Design SummaryCheyenne Regional Airport09 February 2011

Report prepared by Architectural Alliance International, Inc

EXPE

COMM


2/33

Schematic Design SCheyenne Region

09 Febru

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

2. Sense of Place

. Sense of Place Design Process

. Cheyenne Sense of Place Research

. Architectural Design Research

3. Design Process

. Workshop 1

. Workshop 2

. Workshop 3

4. Schematic Design

. Building Plans

. Room Schedule by Department

. Exterior Elevations

. Building sections

. Building Renderings

. Interior Material and Color Palette

5. Site Design


3/33


09 Febru

1. Executive Summa

Executive Summary1.00


4/33


09 Febru

Executive Summary

From September 2010 through February 2011, SEH and Architectural

Alliance International were engaged by the Cheyenne Regional Airport to

develop a schematic design option for a potential new terminal.

The basis of this design was the 10 March 2008 Cheyenne Regional

Airport Terminal Feasibility Study, which studied projected future demand

to determine the appropriate size and scope of a future terminal. The

Feasibility Study projected annual enplanements to reach 28,900 by

the year 2027. In addition, the Feasibility Study examined a number of

potential locations for the future terminal, including redevelopment of the

existing terminal site as well new potential sites. The Feasibility Study

recommended Site 3A, located due East of the existing terminal site,

accessed from the redeveloped Airport Parkway. A Conceptual Design was

proposed as part of the Feasibility Study.

The Schematic Design effort took the recommendation of Site 3A and

the programming and Conceptual Design work of the Feasibility Study as

a launching point. The Schematic Design addresses operational needs

for the airlines and passenger service improvements such as adequate

gate hold seating, pre-security waiting areas, security checkpoint layoutscapable of handling current and potential future needs, mechanical and

electrical system upgrades, more easily maintainable and aesthetically

pleasing finishes, and a strong design presence for the terminal as a

representation of the city of Cheyenne and its surrounding region.

Desired capacity was based upon service of two simultaneous Regional

Jet departures in regularly scheduled domestic passenger traffic (60 seats

per aircraft for a total of 120 seat gate hold capacity). This capacity was

further supported by the potential to service narrow body jets in charter

operations and the potential to handle diverted flights from Denver.

Executive Summary1.01

Working from the Conceptual Design solution, the preferred Schema

Design was developed through a series of Design Workshops with th

full Airport Board and additional meetings with Airport Staff. Throug

refinements based both on current conditions and reassessments o

previous decisions, a revised program was reached to better meet lo

term facility needs. After three workshops, Scheme 2C was selected

by the Airport Board as the preferred alternative. A two-level facility

(with additional partial basement) and accommodations for significa

concession space is proposed, with accommodations for additional

future expansion. The proposed Schematic Design totals 36,000 sf.

compares to 30,400 sf in the Feasibility Study program document, an

35,000 sf in the Conceptual Design.

Probable construction costs for the terminal building are projected to

$297 per square foot, for a total construction cost of $10,700,000. (

Connico Preliminary Rough Order of Magnitude Estimate, provided u

separate cover, for detailed information regarding terminal project c

Probable construction costs have been estimated at $3,200,000 for

new parking lot and related access improvements and $2,500,000 fo

new apron. (See SEH supporting documents, provided under separcover, for detailed information regarding site work costs.) Together,

probable construction costs for the new terminal and site work are

estimated at a total of $16,400,000. Probable construction costs do

include design fees.


5/33


09 Febru

2. Sense of Plac

Sense of Place2.00


6/33


09 Febru

Sense of Place Design Process

VISION AND SENSE OF PLACE

A communitys airport plays an important role in communicating the

regions image to the rest of the world. The airport is the gateway to

region for a great number of visitors each year and the first and last t

travelers see. It is also the place that welcomes home residents of th

Cheyenne region, and it should be a great source of pride. An overa

coordinated vision benefits the long-term and incremental growth of

airport facilities and helps unite planning and design efforts over ma

years.

Developed concurrently with the terminals programming an d early

building and site design, Sense of Place research was conducted t

inform how the design relates to the site, as well as inspire the build

forms and materials.

Sense of Place Boards

Anchorage, AlaskaMemphis , Tennessee

Examples of Sense of Placeintegration

Sense of Place Boards

Examples of Sense of Placeintegration

Sense of Place2.01


7/33


09 Febru

Sense of Place2.02

Cheyenne Sense of Place Research

Referred to as The Magic City of the Plains Cheyenne, the capital o

ming, is the gateway to natural wonders, relics of the frontier, and ou

recreation. Research was conducted to identify historical, cultural a

physical attributes important to the city and region resulting in a co

tion of representative imagery ranging from industry, architecture, to

raphy and cultural influences. The goal of this task was to determin

most appropriate and meaningful imagery that best conveys the sp

Cheyenne.

Key Findings:

A Junction of Railroads- influencing history (first transcontin

railroad) industry, and culture

Topography/Landscape - unique landforms , arid plains, an

wildlife

Architecture - style, material, and form

Culture/Heritage - western frontier and cowboy heritage

The development of an all-encompassing design concept relating to

certain physical or cultural aspects of the area can contribute greatly

making the airport experience an inviting and memorable one. Fromregions unique topography and landscape to its frontier heritage an

deeply rooted western culture, it offers a vast breadth from which to

inspiration that embodies the most unique aspects of Cheyenne and

region.


8/33


09 Febru

Sense of Place2.03

Cheyenne Sense of Place Research

Topography and Landscape

The topography and unique landscape of endless horizons, vast pla

and outcropping landforms inspired the development of a color an

material palette reflective of Cheyenne and the surrounding region.

Important man made elements also characteristic of the landscape w

used to inform pattern, texture and form. Railroad tracks create a un

and linear rhythm and pattern cutting through the landscape while s

fences follow the contours of the landscape creating weathered visu

texture and unique shadows . All of these elements contribute to a d

that is rich with sense of place and meaningful to Cheyenne.

Western Icon

Cheyennes deep western frontier heritage is an important part of th

citys past and present. There is strong iconic and identifiable image

associated with the cowboy and the cowboy culture. The craftsmans

and design associated with saddles, cowboy boots, and western gea

very artistic and beautiful. The tooled and embossed leathers, the s

accents and the filigree patterns can all inspire materials , colors an

patterns for the interior design.


9/33


09 Febru

Architectural Design Research

At the beginning of Schematic Design, A rchitectural Alliance Internat

researched the unique qualities of the City of Cheyenne, its history, c

ture, and its relationship to the natural surroundings. Four main con

were identified, which in turn informed the main concepts for the de

the terminal building:

Context

Both the local context of the immediate site and the larger context o

City of Cheyenne and the Upper Great Plains were carefully studied.

the natural context, weve identified the regional weather, the prevai

ing NW winds, and the strong solar orientation as important element

Moreover, man-made structures like the snow fences and the railroa

well as the vernacular buildings became a source of inspiration for p

the design.

Porch

The concept of a porch can be found at both regional vernacular buil

and more contemporary designs, and functionally relates to the tran

tional space between the inside and the outside of the building. Exp

entially, a porch functions as the front door for arriving and depart

passengers.

Screen

Screens are architectural elements used to modulate and filter sun l

control winds, and filter or screen views. Inspired by the local snow f

and railroad cattle cars, these screens also have the potential of intr

ing dynamic and controlled patterns of shadow and light into the bu

Sustainability

With the belief that every buiding design is a careful response to its

and cultural sites, the schematic design represents an energy efficie

building that implements the sustainable strategies of daylighting, w

efficiency, use of local and renewable materials, and highly efficient

chanical systems among others.

Context

Porch

Screen

Sustainability

Sense of Place2.05


10/33


09 Febru

3. Design Proces

Design Process3.00


11/33


09 Febru

Program Refinement

During the course of the workshops with Airport Staff and the Airport

Board, a number of changes were made to programming assumptions

developed during the 2008 Feasibility Study. These changes were driven

by changes in current conditions and reassessments of previous decisions.

Among the critical changes that impacted the Schematic Design:

Restaurant Size, Location, and Scope

The Feasibility Study assumed a large, signature restaurant and bar lo-

cated on the second floor of the terminal that would be directed primarily

at Cheyenne residents rather than passengers. Based on the financial

difficulties of the existing restaurant at the current terminal, the recent

expansion of restaurant offerings within Cheyenne, and the significant in-

vestment involved in a large restaurant, the Board ultimately decided that

a smaller restaurant with more limited offerings, located to serve primarily

passengers would be more appropriate.

Multi-story Building

The Level Two program in the Conceptual Design was dominated by the

restaurant component, and when this was relocated, there was a question

as to whether or not the building should remain a multi-story building. The

Board determined that the multi-story building was still justified because

the cost difference was determined to be insignificant, the second story

gave the building additional presence on the site, it programmatically

made sense to separate the administrative functions, and because of the

efficiencies allowed by the partial basement.

Gate Hold and Security

The Gate Hold area was increased from a capacity of 60 in the Feasibility

Study to 120 in Schematic Design to allow it to accommodate two simul-

taneous regional jet departures (the ability to accommodate narrow-body

jets and to handle diverted planes from Denver was also a factor in this

decision). The Security Checkpoint was enlarged to allow it to accommo-

date the latest TSA requirements.

Additional Concession Space

The Board directed that additional concession space (beyond the res

rant) should be included as part of the Schematic Design. These ten

spaces may not be strictly driven by passenger traffic, so the spaces

located at the east end of the terminal, where they are adjacent to th

short term parking lot. This location also allows for the spaces to be

repurposed for future terminal expansion. Further, this location wou

allow the concession space to be modified or eliminated during futu

design phases without significantly impacting the terminal layout. T

current layout shows three spaces totaling approximately 500 sf each

capable of accommodating office or small retail tenants.

Airline Ticket Offices

Based on the success of the recently instituted American Eagle servi

DFW, the Board directed that the Schematic Design should a ccommo

three full Airline Ticket Offices in addition to a dedicated TSA space.

Conceptual Design had shown TSA occupying a future ATO space, bu

would have required TSA to relocate should a third Airline be recruite

and left no swing space for charter operations.

Design Process3.01


12/33


09 Febru

Workshop 1

Workshop 1 was held on 27 September 2010 at the offices of the Che

Regional Airport. Present were representatives of Architectural Allia

International, SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and Airport Staff.

The Feasibility Study was validated, especially relative to changes in

airport operations driven by the addition of American Eagle service a

closure of the existing restaurant.

The design process was explained, and examples of previous project

were shown.

Results of initial Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research w

presented.

Sustainability was identified as an important consideration, especia

to the extent that careful building design, orientation, and selection

appropriate building systems could reduce long-term operating cost

Design Process3.02


13/33


09 Febru

Four plans were presented that demonstrated options for the restau

within the new terminal.

Schemes 1A and 1B are both one level schemes. Scheme 1A locates

restaurant adjacent to the Gate Hold for easy passenger access. Sch

1B locates the restaurant to the west, for adjacencies to the Loading and Short Term Parking and ease of after-hours access.

Design Process3.03

Floor Plan Scheme 1B

Floor Plan Scheme 1A

Workshop 2

Workshop 2 was held on 10 November 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne

Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meeting.

Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International, SEH,

Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board.

The Sense of Place and Architectural Design Research was presented to the

Airport Board.


14/33


09 Febru

Design Process3.04

Sketches were presented demonstrating both a two level option and

level option with a high-roofed volume over the public spaces.

The Airport Board selected Scheme 2A as their preferred option,

demonstrating strong support for a two level option. There was, how

some concern about whether the terminal could support a large, sign

restaurant. They requested another alternative be prepared demons

a smaller scale restaurant located on Level One, but still retaining

administrative functions on Level Two.

Concept Sketches

Floor Plan Scheme 2BFloor Plan Scheme 2A

Workshop 2

Schemes 2A and 2B are both two level schemes. Unlike the Conceptual

Design, which show the two level massing located to the East, these

schemes shift the two level massing to the West, still retaining a generous

double-height space at the Arrivals and Departures Hall and the Gate

Hold space. Both show a large, signature Restaurant space located at the

Northwest of the terminal to maximize views to the airfield. Scheme 2A

shows the Security Checkpoint oriented East-West, whereas Scheme 2B

shows it oriented North-South.


15/33


09 Febru

Design Process3.05

Scheme 2C is an alternative showing a smaller restaurant located im

ately to the west of the Gate Hold space, but still retaining an upper

for the administrative functions and public viewing space. Scheme 2

the advantage of offering better service for passengers, while still m

taining strong views to the airfield.

Scheme 2C was ultimately selected by the Airport Board.

Workshop 3

Workshop 3 was held on 08 December 2010 at the offices of the Cheyenne

Regional Airport as a part of the regularly scheduled Airport Board meet-

ing. Present were representatives of Architectural Alliance International,

SEH, Airport Director David Haring, and the Airport Board.

As requested by the Board at the previous workshop, two schemes were

presented. Scheme 2A is a refinement of the preferred plan presented

at the previous meeting with a large, signature restaurant located in the

northwest corner of Level Two.

Floor Plan Scheme 2CFloor Plan Scheme 2A


16/33


09 Febru

Workshop 3

Interior renderings were presented, showing how the public spaces

terminal are impacted by the changes between the 2A and 2C schem

Design Process3.06

SCHEME 2CSCHEME 2A

SECTION


17/33


09 Febru

Design Process3.07

Workshop 3

Two alternate exterior expressions were presented. Both options sh

curbside faade dominated by glazing with vestibules projecting thro

the faade, and both are anchored by large stone or concrete panels

Option 1 utilizes a random patterned metal screening element along

the upper stories, used to moderate the solar exposure into the spa

Option 2 shows a more consistent upper faade of metal panels,

interrupted by large glass openings crowned by projecting roof forms

which act to shield the sun.

The options demonstrate two possible treatments of a curbside cano

one a solid projecting element and the other made up of glass and s

The Board preferred Option 2, but expressed some concern that the

was still too heavy or boxy, and further expressed concern about the

building being dominated by flat roofs. This concern was addressed

subsequent refinements of the final Schematic Design.


18/33


09 Febru

4. Schematic Desig

Schematic Design4.00


19/33


09 Febru

UP

DN

UP

DN

2754 S F

Gat e H o l d44

1457 S F

P as s enger S c reen i ng

61

3307 S F

D epar t u re / A r r i v a l H a l l

62

3116 S F

B aggage C l a i m

64

629SF

DeplaningCorridor

65

n ri

r i n

li

n i n

i l i n m

152 S F

V es t i bu l e

2

524 S F

B aggage

3

429 S F

D oc k / R ec e i v i ng

9

152 S F

V es t i bu l e

16

266 S F

K i t c hen17

1

157 S F

Lobby

21

68 SF

V es t i bu l e22

981 S F

R es t au ran t

26

63 SF

M on i t o r

31

69 S F

S c reen i ng

32109 S F

V end i ng

33

73 SF

V es t i bu l e

35 50 S F

Gat e 1

41

50 S F

Gat e 2

42

31 SF

Jan

43

95 S F

U n i s ex

50

305 S F

Men

51

305 S F

W om en

52

160 S F

R en t a l C ar

53

160 S F

R en t a l C ar

55

161 S F

R en t a l C ar

59

160 S F

R en t a l C ar

66

322 S F

ATO

68

322 S F

ATO

69

322 S F

ATO

70

323 S F

T S A B ag S c reen i ng

71

487 S F

TSA Office72

2128 S F

B aggage M ak e-U p

73

2723 S F

T i c k e t i ng H a l l63

361 S F

Circ

74

454 S F

C onc es s i ons

75

502 S F

C onc es s i ons

76

529 S F

C onc es s i ons

77

92 SF

V es t i bu l e

79

54 SF

Toilet

80

54 SF

Toilet

8141 S F

Jan

82

JIHGFCBA K L M N O Q R S

4

55

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

D.5

1'-6"

27

'-0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' -0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' -0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

FUTURE

GATEHOLD

EXPANSION

FUTURE

EXPANSION

1.8

32'-0"

23'-0"

30'-0"

597 S F

C onc es s i on C i rc u l a t i on

97

DN

DN

663 SF

Conf Room10

li

i

i l i n m

708 SF

Upper Gallery

15

69 SF

Lobby23

230 SF

Stair 224

O PEN T O BELO W

O PEN T O BELO W641 SF

Break-Out36

ROOF

O PEN T O BELO W

67 SF

Buffet84

83 SF

Toilet85


4

5

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

43 SF

Jan86

46 SF

Storage87

D.5

1'-6"

27'-0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' -0" 20' -0" 30' -0" 30' -0" 20' -0" 20' - 0" 20' -0" 20' - 0" 20' -0" 20' - 0"

187 SF

Kitchen88

139 SF

Office

89118 SF

Office90

118 SF

Office91

314 SF

Director92

157 SF

Admin Storage93 582 SF

Reception / Circ94

72 SF

Intern95

64 SF

Copy96

1.8

32'-

0"

23'-0"

1095 SF

Circ99

UP

UP

1368 SF

Mechanical Room37

n i n

i l i n m

520 SF

Concession Storage38

1719 SF

Utility Tunnel39

1306 SF

Storm Refuge83


4

55

6

2

33

0.9

1

D.5

1'-6"

27'-

0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

1.8

23'-0"

30'-

0"

359 SF

Storage98

level 2

level 1

lower level

Plan Description

Level One, 25,300 sf

The Schematic Design proposes a facility with primary public and airport

operations on the ground level, with public access from two entrances

along the curbside (one at Ticketing and one at Bag Claim) and additional

entrances from both the East and West Short Term Parking Lots. The

Ticketing Hall, Arrivals and Departures Hall, and Bag Claim together form agenerous public space that would be populated with welcoming soft seat-

ing and a fireplace lounge for waiting passengers and the public.

In the Ticketing Hall, the facility is designed to accommodate three Airline

Ticket Offices (ATO) with adjacent Baggage Make-Up spaces. There is

dedicated space for Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of-

fices. The Security Checkpoint is designed to accommodate the latest

TSA requirements and to provide flexibility f or future changes in security

requirements. The Gate Hold contains seating for 120 and two departure

gates with room for easy expansion to a third departure gate or the option

to add a passenger boarding bridge. There is a fully separated Deplaning

Corridor. The Bag Claim provides 50 linear feet of flat plate baggage claim

area, with space to accommodate a future T shaped device to provide

additional capacity.

Located immediately adjacent to the Gate Hold, a Restaurant conces-

sion space is open to the public but primarily oriented towards meeting

the needs of flight passengers. The Restaurant and associated Kitchen

totals 1250 sf. In addition to the Restaurant space, the Schematic Design

accommodates three additional concession spaces at the east end of

the terminal, totaling 1500 sf of leasable space and 600 sf of associated

circulation space (this space is designed to be easily convertible to future

Airline Ticket Offices should future passenger demand require it). There

are also four Rental Car Offices provided, totaling 640 sf.

Level Two, 5,400 sf

A second floor over the west portion of the building would be served

elevator and provide administrative space and a large Conference Ro

capable of holding Airport Board meetings with public seating. Ther

Upper Gallery providing views to the airfield and the Arrivals and Dep

tures Hall for the general public and a Breakout Space with soft seatThe Administration area contains four office spaces and support fun

including a Kitchen. The Kitchen, Upper Gallery, and Breakout Spac

work in conjunction with the Conference Room to host public functio

Lower Level, 5,300 sf

A partial basement is designed for provision of Mechanical space an

distribution to the upper floors through a Utility Tunnel. Storage spa

provided both for the Airport and for concession users. Additional s

provided for storm refuge of up to 260 people. As the design progre

the exact extents of the partial basement will need to be determined

on Mechanical and Storage needs (in concert with budget refinemen



20/33


09 Febru

UP

DN

UP

DN

2754 SF

Gate Hold44

1457 SF

Passenger Screening61

3307 SF

Depar ture / A r r i val Hal l62

3116 SF

Baggage Claim64

629SF

DeplaningCorridor

65

Gate Lob

Operation

Public Sp

Concessio

Building S

152 SF

Vesti bule2

524 SF

Baggage

3

429 SF

Dock / Recei v i ng

9

152 SF

Vesti bule

16

266 SF

K i tchen17

LEVEL 1

157 SF

Lobby21

68 SF

Vesti bule22

981 SF

Restaurant26

63 SF

Moni tor 31

69 SF

Screening32

109 SF

Vending33

73 SF

Vesti bule35 50 SF

Gate 141

50 SF

Gate 242

31 SF

Jan43

95 SF

Unisex50

305 SF

Men51

305 SF

Women52

160 SF

Rental Car

53160 SF

Rental Car 55

161 SF

Rental Car 59

160 SF

Rental Car

66

0 32 48 64

322 SF

ATO

68

322 SF

ATO

69

322 SF

ATO

70

323 SF

TSA Bag Screening71

487 SF

TSA Office72

2128 SF

Baggage Make-Up73

2723 SF

Ticketi ng Hal l63

361 SF

Ci rc

74

454 SF

Concess ions75

502 SF

Concess ions76

529 SF

Concess ions77

92 SF

Vesti bule79

54 SF

Toi l et80

54 SF

Toi l et81

41 SF

Jan82


4

55

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

D.5

1'-6"

27'-0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

FUTURE

GATEHOLD

EXPANSION

FUTURE

EXPANSION

1.8

32'-0"

23'-0"

30'-0"

597 SF

Concess ion Ci rculati on97


S h i D i S


21/33


09 Febru

DN

DN

663 SF

Conf Room10

Public Spa

Offices

Building Sy

708 SF

Upper Gal l ery

15

LEVEL 2

69 SF

Lobby

23

230 SF

Stai r 224

OPEN T O BEL OW

OPEN T O BEL OW641 SF

Break-Out36

ROOF

OPEN T O BEL OW

67 SF

Buffet

84

83 SF

Toi l et

85


4

5

6

2

33

0.9 1

1

43 SF

Jan86

46 SF

Storage87

D.5

0 32 48 64

1'-6"

27'-0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

187 SF

K i tchen

88139 SF

Office

89118 SF

Office90

118 SF

Office91

314 SF

Di rec tor 92

157 SF

Admin S torage93 582 SF

Recepti on / Ci rc

94

72 SF

Intern95

64 SF

Copy96

1.8

32'-0"

23'-0"

1095 SF

Ci rc99


S h ti D i S


22/33


09 Febru

UP

UP

1368 SF

Mechani cal Room37

Concessions

Building Systems

520 SF

Concess ion S torage

38

1719 SF

Uti l i ty Tunnel39

LOWER LEVEL

1306 SF

Storm Refuge

83


4

55

6

2

33

0.9

1

0 32 48 64

D.5

1'-6"

27'-0"

28'-0"

10'-0"

20'-0"

10'-0"

20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 30' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0"

1.8

23'-0"

30'-0"

359 SF

Storage98


Schematic Design S


23/33


09 Febru


Operations

Baggage Make-Up Level 1 2128 SF

Baggage Level 1 524 SF

TSA Office Level 1 487 SF

Circ Level 1 361 SF

TSA Bag Screening Level 1 323 SF

ATO Level 1 322 SF

ATO Level 1 322 SFATO Level 1 322 SF

4790 SF

Public Space

Departure / Arrival Hall Level 1 3307 SF

Baggage Claim Level 1 3116 SF

Ticketing Hall Level 1 2723 SF

Circ Level 2 1095 SF

Upper Gallery Level 2 708 SF

Break-Out Level 2 641 SF

Concession Circulation Level 1 597 SF

Men Level 1 305 SF

Women Level 1 305 SF

Stair 1 Level 1 230 SF

Stair 2 Level 2 230 SF

Lobby Level 1 157 SF

Vestibule Level 1 152 SF


Unisex Level 1 95 SF


Toilet Level 2 83 SF

Lobby Level 2 69 SF


14126 SF35993 SF

Building Systems

Utility Tunnel Lower Level 1719 SF

Mechanical Room Lower Level 1368 SF

Storm Refuge Lower Level 1306 SF

Dock / Receiving Level 1 429 SF

Storage Lower Level 359 SF

Jan Level 2 43 SF

Jan Level 1 31 SF5255 SF

Concessions

Restaurant Level 1 981 SF

Concessions Level 1 529 SF

Concession Storage Lower Level 520 SF



Kitchen Level 1 266 SF

Rental Car Level 1 161 SF




3893 SF

Gate Lobby and Security

Gate Hold Level 1 2754 SF

Passenger Screening Level 1 1457 SF

Deplaning Corridor Level 1 629 SF

Vending Level 1 109 SF


Screening Level 1 69 SF

Monitor Level 1 63 SF

Toilet Level 1 54 SFToilet Level 1 54 SF

Gate 1 Level 1 50 SF

Gate 2 Level 1 50 SF

Jan Level 1 41 SF

5403 SF

Offices

Conf Room Level 2 663 SF

Reception / Circ Level 2 582 SF

Director Level 2 314 SF

Kitchen Level 2 187 SF

Admin Storage Level 2 157 SF

Office Level 2 139 SF



Intern Level 2 72 SF

Buffet Level 2 67 SF

Copy Level 2 64 SF

Storage Level 2 46 SF

2526 SF

Room Schedule

Shows the Schematic Design building program broken out into the fo

ing departments:

Building Systems Mechanical and building support spaces

Concessions Leasable spaces, including Restaurant, Rental Car Offiand other Tenant Spaces

Gate Lobby and Security Gate Hold, Security Checkpoint, and asso

support spaces

Offices Administrative Offices, Conference Room, and support spa

Operations Airline Ticket Offices, Baggage Make-Up, Baggage Claim

support spaces

Public Space Public gathering, circulation, and support spaces

Schematic Design S


24/33


09 Febru

south elevation0 5 15 30 FT

west elevation0 5 15 30 FT

Building Elevations

The Schematic Design proposal orients the curbside faade to appro

mately due south, aligning it with the runway beyond. This orientati

allows for favorable solar access, bringing in south light which can b

modulated by sunscreening elements and deep overhangs, allowing

more sun in the winter months when it is needed, and less in the sum

months when it isnt.

The south faade is grounded by light colored precast concrete pane

the east end. These are envisioned to relate to the tones of the light

stone that is found regionally, and will have texture and tones to enl

them. At the ground level, there will be extensive glazing that is shie

by the deep roadside canopy. The glazing will be penetrated by the t

vestibules and the rental car offices, which are envisioned to be clad

wood on both the interior and exterior.

The building massing steps up to its m ulti-story massing, and at the west end is terminated by the stair and elevator tower, which is agai

in the precast concrete panels.


Schematic Design S


25/33


09 Febru

north elevation0 5 15 30 FT

east elevation0 5 15 30 FT

Building Elevations

The upper story of the terminal is clad in a mix of copper metal panelin select locations, large expanses of glazing that bring daylighting d

into the space. These windows will be carefully located to take adva

of views, and will be treated with sunscreening elements as their exp

requires. Windows on the buildings north faade are able to bring i

daylight without concern about heat gain or glare.

The precast panels and metal panels wrap the more utilitarian portio

the terminals airside, but the Gate Hold, Restaurant, and Upper Gal

have expansive views out to the airside and are treated with glazing

articulated copper panels.


Schematic Design S


26/33


09 Febru

cross section at cafe

cross section at gate hold

Building Sections

In response to the Boards concerns about a flat-roofed terminal des

and that the building looked too boxy or heavy during Workshop 3, t

exterior design was reevaluated. A Butterfly roof was determined

good fit for the terminal, providing a light feeling roof with deep overto provide sun protection. This roof form allows water to be controlle

fectively, keeping it from running onto either the curbside or the airs

also allows for rain water to be collected and retained for site irrigati


Schematic Design S


27/33

gCheyenne Region

09 Febru

Building Renderings

A continuous clerestory window immediately below the deep overha

makes the roof appear to float over the building. The continuous gla

ing at the curbside makes for an easy transition between the interior

the exterior spaces, with the fireplace visible and inviting. A smaller

monitor over the ticketing hall brings sunlight into these spaces.

view of terminal from parking


view of terminal from access road

Schematic Design S


28/33

gCheyenne Region

09 Febru

view of curb side at baggage claim

view of curb side from SW


view of curb side

Schematic Design S


29/33

Cheyenne Region

09 Febru

view of gate hold from NE

view of gate hold from NW


Schematic Design S


30/33

Cheyenne Region

09 Febru

view of arrival/departure hall


Schematic Design SCh i


31/33

Cheyenne Region

09 Febru

Interior Material and Color Concept A


Interior Material and Color Concept B

Schematic Design SCh R i


32/33

Cheyenne Region

09 Febru


Concrete Floor Pattern



33/33

Cheyenne Region

09 Febru

5. Site Desig

Site Design5.00

Documents

Schematic Design-Cheyenne Regional Airport