Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Revised proposal for a regional monitoring sub-program of continuous noisePurposeQuantify the pressure of continuous sound in the HELCOM region
AimTo determine the sound pressure level in the Baltic Sea through standardized and coordinated activities by Member States
2017 2018 2019
Post-monitoring analyses, e.g. optimization of number and location of rigs vs. gain of results
Minor monitoring at prioritized locations and automized runs of soundscape model
2015 20162014 ?
Current monitoring
Year Denmark Germany Poland Estonia Finland Sweden Lithuania Latvia Russia2014 - - -2015 - - - - -2016 - - -2017 - - -
Status of the acoustic measurements in HELCOM countries during 2014 – 2017 “” measurements at one or more locations
A regional coordination is necessary for an cost effective and quality controlled monitoring program.
Current monitoring• National monitoring by 6 of 9 member states (no regional coordination)
• Standards of monitoring and signal processing already developed
• Infrastructure for a regional data sharing platform and visualization tool exist after the BIAS project.
Regional monitoring sub-program
Minor monitoring – every year1. Measurements at prioritized locations
- performed by Member States.2. Maps produced by a soundscape model
- performed by appointed party.3. Soundscape maps combined with
measurements in a visualization tool- performed by appointed party.
Regional monitoring sub-program
Major monitoring – when needed1. Need for extended monitoring efforts is based on
the difference between yearly observed and modelled results, or by the need for specific actions or results dictated by HELCOM processes.
2. Purpose to calibrate the soundscape model-performed by Member States.
3. Optimization of number and locations of sensors vs. gain of results - performed by appointed party.
2017 2018 2019
Post-monitoring analyses, e.g. optimization of number and location of rigs vs. gain of results
Minor monitoring at prioritized locations and automized runs of soundscape model
2015 20162014 ?
Current Soundscape planning tool
Emergence maps of traffic noise above natural sounds
The map show the areas where the sound pressure level of anthropogenic noise is above natural (wind and wave) sound –50 % of the time.
The data represents sound pressure level for the 125 Hz 1/3 octave band and is an average over the full water column.
Data arrangements
?
S&C
Considered necessary: - Agreements on a responsible caretaker of the data sharing platform (draft caretakingagreement).- Monitor the soundscape planning tool.- Manage administration and quality control.
Other data demands such as AISA, VMS, wind, sound speed, need to be handled.
All costs in EUROMonitoring cost per nation Denmark Germany Poland Estonia Finland Sweden Lithuania Total sum
Labor cost per deployment 5 769 4 800 3 500 4 000 24 100 18 829 3 500 64 498 Sum ships and consumables per deployment 1 544 12 500 2 250 4 500 15 318 9 856 2 250 48 218 Sum travel expenses per deployment 221 300 750 300 3 035 1 074 750 6 430 Total cost per deployment 7 534 17 600 6 500 8 800 42 453 29 759 6 500 119 146
Yearly cost: four deployments DK, DE, PL, EE, LT; two deployments FI, SE 30 136 € 70 400 € 26 000 € 35 200 € 84 906 € 59 518 € 26 000 € 332 160 €
Shared costs Minor Monitoring Company Costs
DSP* Initiation cost and development (60 h) Agreed responsible caretaker 6 000
DSP* Yearly administration (40 h) Agreed responsible caretaker 4 000
DSP* National data quality control (60 h) Agreed responsible caretaker 6 000
SPT** Initiation cost and development (100 h) Appointed party 10 000
SPT** Yearly administration Appointed party 5 000
SPT** Input of measured data Appointed party 2 000 Shared cost first year Shared cost subsequent years
Program coordination - initiation of operationl monitoring program (100 h) Agreed responsible caretaker 10 000 43 000 € 27 000 €* DSP= Data Sharing Platform Cost per nation (9 nations) Cost per nation (9 nations) ** SPT= Soundscape Planning Tool 4 778 € 3 000 €
Shared costs Minor Monitoring production of soundscape maps Company Costs
Modelling Initial cost for setting up automized input data Appointed party 10 000
Modelling Input data (not automized) Appointed party 10 000
Modelling Yearly cost for running the model Appointed party 35 000 Modelling cost first year Modelling cost subsequent years
55 000 € 45 000 €
Cost estimate for Minor Monitoring
