SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation 7.0 Version

8/17/2019 SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation 7.0 Version

1/61

]

COREY PEARSON[ASUG INSTALLATION MEMBER

MEMBER SINCE: 2008

CHAVONE JACOBS[ASUG INSTALLATION MEMBER

MEMBER SINCE: 2003

ALLAN FISHER [ASUG INSTALLATION MEMBER

MEMBER SINCE: 2008

General MillsSAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation 7.0,

Version for SAP NetWeaver Ramp-Up Project& SAP NetWeaver BW Ehp1 Upgrade Experience

Jay Roble – General Mills, Inc.

Amy Stine – General Mills, Inc.Brian Tyson - SandPoint Consulting

Ver 042409


2/61

Real Experience. Real Advantage.

[

2

Learning Points

Ramp-Up experience of SAP BPC 7.0 NW How BPC works in a Sourcing Planning Project

Importance of the planning data model and master data

Key Lessons Learned

Added complexity of SAP NetWeaver & SAP NW BW BPC 7.0 NW integration with BW

Note: SAP BW shop, no prior BPC / OutlookSoft experience


3/61


[ Agenda

Introduction Planning Project

Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-Up?

BPC Sourcing Planning Project

Ramp-Up Obstacles EhP1 Upgrade & BPC installation

Key Differences BPC NW & MS, BPC & BW

Key Learnings

Appendix – Additional NW-BW BPC info

3


4/61


[ Introduction - Presenters

Jay Roble – General Mills

Integration Architect – IS Data Warehousing 10+ years SAP & SAP BW experience

Amy Stine – General Mills

Senior Applications Analyst – IS Supply Chain

7+ years SAP ECC & BPS experience

Brian Tyson – SandPoint Consulting

Principle Consultant, SandPoint Consulting

5+ years implementing BPC Microsoft Platform

1 year Ramp-Up BPC Netweaver Platform

4


5/61


[

World’s 6th largest food company

$14.9 billion in FY08 net sales*

29,500 employees

Marketed in morethan 100 countries

Fortune 500: #214**

* Includes proportionate share of JV sales

** Excludes proportionate share of JV sales

The Company of Champions

Introduction (cont)

General Mills


6/61


[ Agenda






Key Learnings


6


7/61Real Experience. Real Advantage.

[

7

Planning Project - Overview Goal:

Streamline the direct materials budgeting / planning process

Design Objectives

Fully integrated operational planning/tracking system

Automate Manual Processes

Update of actual data

Excel V-Looks ups for additional actual data fields

40 Offline Excel input buyer planning worksheets

Combining 40 Excel worksheets back into one

Improve Reporting

Immediate consolidated reporting on buyer input Flexibility to report by Finished Good/Division

Exception reporting capabilities

Eliminate 3 Week Cycle time & no visibility until cycle complete!



[ Planning Project – Overview (cont)

8

Sourcing Manufacturing Division (Mktg)

RM Code

(e.g. flour, vitamin,

carton, sugar)

RM Rates @ Code/Plant level

BOM Conversion

RM Requirementin lbs/cs/etc.

“Production FP”

FP Production Volume

FP Sku/PNL

(e.g., 15 oz. Yellow BoxCheerios or Cheerios PNL)

FP RM rates

Delivery Volume Est. (FP)

BOMConversion

Inventory Adj‟s

& Locations

“Delivered FP”“Raw Materials”

Two “Languages”. Raw Material (RM) & Finished Product (FP)



[ Agenda






Key Learnings


9


10/61


[

10

Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-UP? – Initial Plan

Project Kick-Off

Plan to use BW-IP (Integrated Planning)

BW-BPS being replaced by BW-IP

Sent Employee to BW-IP training

Hired SAP BW-IP consultant

BW-IP Proof Of Concept


11/61


[ Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-Up?

11

After attending SAP TechEd 08, indications were:

• BPC is now the long term solution

• BW-Integrated Planning (IP) is not a long term solution


12/61


[ Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-Up (cont.)

12


13/61


[

13

Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-Up - Options

1. BW-BPS (Business Planning & Simulation)

Currently used & stable technology Support mode till 2013

No available in house resource

Don‟t want to train on “Old” functionality

Don‟t want to hire consultant to develop on “Old” functionality

Would be throwing away development

2. BW-IP (Integrated Planning)

Current prototype

No in-house resource

Roadmap indicates will be replaced by BPC

3. SAP-BPC

Ramp-Up Netweaver Version

Microsoft Version


14/61


[

14

Why BPC 7.0 NW Ramp-Up – BPC NW Benefits

BPC NW vs. BPC MS

Increased dimensionality – removed 65,000 member limit

Lifecycle Management – Transport

Support for NW BWA (BW Accelerator)

BPC NW Benefits

SAP Netweaver platform fits with our corporate model SAP Roadmap (BW-BPS & BW-IP being replaced)

Leverage existing NW-BW system & hardware

Leverage existing in-house NW expertise

Perceived ease of integration with core BW data Excel front-end a plus, and integration to other Office apps

Can put more power in the hands of the business

No migration back from MS to NW.


15/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project





Key Learnings


15


16/61


[

16

Sourcing Planning Project

Goal:

Streamline the direct materials budgeting / planning process andprovide a system to facilitate the monthly assessment and

communication of raw material risks & opportunities.

Benefits

Plan & Actual Reporting of direct raw material costs by Finished

Product hierarchy levels (Division, Business Unit)

Introduction of new buyer-defined hierarchy for custom grouping

of raw materials

Budgeting Tools with Simulation and immediate feedback loop(eliminate 3 week cycle time)

Greatly increased data integrity and accuracy by eliminating 40offline spreadsheets


17/61


[

17

Sourcing Planning Project - Project Team

GMI IS Analysts

Business user requirements, BPC install & development BW BPS & BEx experience, No prior BPC experience

GMI BW architect

BW backend integration, NW upgrade, technical issues

BW data modeling, BEx & NW upgrade experience

SAP Consultant

BPC solution design, input schedules, data manager

No prior BPC Experience

SandPoint Consultant

Outlooksoft expert (BPC 5.1 MS)

BPC solution design, input schedules, training rest of team

SAP Ramp-up Coach

Direct contact with BPC NW developers, customer message

escalation, white paper solutions.


18/61


[

18

Project – As Is Business Process

Heavily manual process Both Business & IS

Detailed “Bottoms-Up” Rates by Mat‟l/Plant - only twice per year

Offline monthly outlook process

Divisions requiring Cost Impacts

by Finished Product Hierarchy To determine pricing actions

Lengthy cycle time 3 wks on avg & no visibility until cycle is complete

Multiple sources of information ECC, BW, Spreadsheets, Market

Current Process

Buyer

Worksheets

SAPBW

BEx /Excel

SAPECC

Manualspreadsheet

edits

Offline Data

DataReconciling


19/61


[

19

Project – To Be

Greatly increased data integrity and accuracy through elimination

of manual massaging of data and numerous offline spreadsheets Provide flexibility for both detailed „bottoms-up‟ planning and

higher level „top-down‟ outlook updates

Immediate feedback on cost impacts and ability to revise and dowhat-if scenarios prior to ECC load

V2

Vn…

V1BPC

To Be

SAPBW

BEx /Excel

SAPECC

ImmediateReporting

DataIntegrity

ForecastAccuracy


20/61


[ Project Data Model – BPC Security Four teams

IS Admin (9 users, incl. consultants) Access to everything

Finance „Power Users‟ ( 5 users)

Access to submit data

Access to maintain dimension members

Access to maintain corporate templates

Sourcing Buyers (40 users)

Access to read and submit data

Read Only/Reporting (18 users)

No update access

BPC Application Security is administered from the BPC AdminClient only

Does not leverage existing SAP Netweaver security

20


21/61


[

21

Project Data Model – Overall Design

Data Volume:11,500 raw material/plant combinations60,000 raw material/finished good/plant combinations


22/61


[

22

Project Data Model – Application Design

BPC is an Account-Based modeling tool

e.g., one key figure model Used KEYFIGUREID dimension (i.e. QTY, PRICE, SPEND, etc.)

for qualifying the one key figure value (SignData)

Duplicate dimension member values across dimensions

Duplicate values are allowed in BPC However, supporting EV functions (“fully qualified data”) had bugs

Not fixed until BPC SP2

Interim fix to prefix dimension keys where risk of duplication

Time dimension BPC requires YEAR.XXX format

Not the same time concept as BW

e.g., 2008.INP, 2008.Q, 2008.Total, MSTR.INP, MSTR.Q, etc.


23/61


[ Project Data Model – Application Design (cont) Hierarchies

Hierarchy nodes must also be dimension members Hierarchy display can be challenging. We opted to create

additional properties for a „flattened‟ view

Dummy data

Creation of dummy dimension members to handle data atdifferent intersections

inability to have unassigned dimensions

Versions

Multiple versions for snapshots, planning cycles

Units

BPC does not have inherent units. We created another

KeyFigureID and posted the value to SignData so it could be

used in calculations.

23


24/61


[ Project Data Model – Data Examples

KeyFigureID

Prefixed member values

24


25/61


[ Project Data Model – Data Examples (cont) Hierarchy

25

Each hierarchy parent mustalso be a dimensionmember

BPC Hierarchies are exclusive to asingle dimension


26/61


[

26

Project Data Model – Data Transformation (cont)

Allocations

Actuals at RawMaterial/Plant/Vendor Plan Production at Fini/RawMaterial/Plant/SourcePlant

Weighted Avg. Rate at Raw Material/Plant

Supporting data at RM/Plant (Price Unit, prev. plan price)

Could not use Allocation Engine due to keywords not supporteduntil BPC SP02

Workaround BPS Fox formulas

Currency conversions

Note – must convert „quantities‟ as well as „amounts‟

Copy app to app (cube to cube)

Used BPC Data Manager InfoProvider load functionality


27/61


[

27

Project Data Model – User Interface

Excel as interface was a big hit with our user base

Familiarity / easy transition from old process to new one Use of Conditional formatting to warn for unusual data

Some excel crashing issues

Formatting of leading zeroes, rounding

Admin Console vs. Web Admin Certain parameters are only accessible via the Web Admin

Harder to be in multiple instances at same time, unlike SAPGUI


28/61


[

28

Project Data Model – Lessons Learned

Account-based model can be challenging for operational (key-

figure based) planning Greatly increased cube record counts

Loading of transactional data – one load per key figure

No inherent units

BPC for NW is not integrated with BW Master Data PRO - provides flexibility for ad-hoc master data

CON – cannot take advantage of existing rich, complex, accurate

master data

CON – duplication of data and data loading capabilities NO UNASSIGNED!!!!

Data must post to an intersection of all application dimensions ata base level


29/61


[

29

Project Data Model – Lessons Learned (cont)

Hierarchies provide on-the-fly rollup, but nodes are not postable

BPC Dimension Properties are not the same as BW NavigationalAttributes

No supporting master data

Cannot be used for slice-and-dice, only for restricting data using EvDREfilters

Limited aggregation capability

Locking Mechanism

Plan data is only locked at the time of write back

Minimizes end user error messages, but last-in is what stays

Script, MDX and Allocation logic Can be challenging to learn and understand


30/61


[

30

Project Data Model – Lessons Learned (cont)

Excel as a front end has positives and negatives

User adoption is high for excel “power users”

Users must be respectful of the input schedule and reportdesigns

BW instance refresh

Careful you do not overwrite work-in-progress Make regular backups of your file service files (script logic,

transformation files, etc.) by downloading these to a local drivefrom UJFS

Currency conversion is different than NW

For operational models, must convert everything, includingquantities

Conversion is a triangulation on USD, not a “From – To”


31/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project



Ramp-Up Obstacles

EhP1 Upgrade & BPC installation


Key Learnings


31


32/61


[ Ramp-Up Obstacles

Lack of product support for duplicate master data

EVDRE bugs with fully-qualified dimension members

Prefixed dimension members to create unique values

Application Available Flag inconsistencies – note fixed

JavaScript in conversion files – syntax issue fixed

Authorizations too broad on service users

SAP reviewed and tightened up the role authorizations

Installation issues

Clarifications and guidance provided by RIG Back Office

Performance of input schedules with comments – note fixed

Performance of maintaining dimension members – note fixed

32


33/61


[ Ramp-Up Obstacles (cont)

Script logic syntax errors and gaps in functionality

Note fixes and use of BPS Fox due to timing of SP02

Troubleshooting BPC error messages

Errors were cryptic or misleading

BPC Logs not clear

Customer message support challenges

Unable to allow SAP connectivity to .NET server

SAP support personnel still gaining product knowledge

SAP Developers in opposite time zone

No integrated application help

Separate PDF and online available

33

[


34/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project



Ramp-Up Obstacles

EhP1 Upgrade & BPC installation


Key Learnings


34

[


35/61


[

35

Upgrade Dates

Ehp1 upgrade was a separate project

Ehp1 separate Ramp-up for non-BPC ramp-up customers

TEST pre-release Ehp1 sp01 (no Java) & BPC 7.0 NW sp00

Late RTC of Ehp1 would have cut into our testing time

[


36/61


[

36

General Mills SAP Global Instance Landscape

TPP

SCM 5.0sp 8

ERPECC 5.0sp 13

EWPEhp1 sp2

NW-BW 7.01- BW-BPS- BPC 7.0 sp1

APP

SCM 4.1sp 8

HRPECC 5.0

sp 13

HWP

BW 3.5sp 16

SRPSRM 4.0

sp 8

XIPPI 7.0

sp 13

CRP

CRM 5.0sp 5

CWPBW 3.5

sp 9

CFP

ERP 4.7sp 19

PTPPortal 7.0 sp 10

ISMSolution Manager 4.0 sp 13

IEP

ECC 5.0sp

IBP

BW 3.5sp 16

IPPPortal 7.0

sp 10

MSPNW2004

sp 17

CMPSolution Manager 4.0 sp 13

InternationalNorth America Core

Coupon

[


37/61


[

37

EhP1 Upgrade

Ehp1 sp02 (BI 7.01)

BPC 7.0 NW required Ehp1

BPC is an add-in, separate install

Upgrade from NW-BW 7.00 SPS13/SP15

Enhancement pack installer utility

Allows upgrade to SPS14/SP16 and apply Ehp1 in one step

Also upgraded SAP EP Portal & SAP PI (Process Integration XI)

NW-BW

General Mills Enterprise Data Warehouse

7 TB

NW-BW Enhancement Pack not the same as ECC No switch technology, all or nothing in NW-BW

Software component changed SAP_BW_700 to SAP_BW_ 701

[


38/61


[

38

EhP1 Upgrade - „Enhancement Pack Installer‟ New „Enhancement Pack Installer‟ utility

Java based GUI run from the web

Similar to the „Upgrade Assistant‟ used to install ECC600

The „shadow system‟

New concept if not seen the ECC600 upgrade

Shadow system is a copy of the SAP system

Upgrade can occur in shadow system while production up and running

Activities during specific phases of the upgrade

Simply preparation occurs in the shadow system (Uptime)

Eventually need to lock down the production system

To avoid changes that would result in mismatches between the shadow andproduction system

Downtime appx 4 – 6 hours (mostly Java install)

[


39/61


[

39

EhP1 Upgrade - Upgrade Tips

Pre-Upgrade

Check for inactive objects before an upgrade, program RSUPGRCHECK

All DSO data activated DBA create Oracle table spaces

Do Kernel upgrade as early as possible

Download Java patches before starting upgrade

„/usr/sap/trans/EPS/in‟

Start PROD upgrade 2 weeks early Upgrade to Pre-Process (Allows to resolve issues)

3 – 4 Days before PROD Upgrade

Upgrade to downtime

Locks system for changes

Allows loads, reporting, etc.

Post-upgrade Re-enable SNC (single sign-on), enhancement pack installation disabled

[


40/61


[ Ehp1 Upgrade Issues InfoCubes

Manage Tab dump if using 7.0 Archive

Note 834280 - Installing technical BI Content after upgrade

Tran: RSTCO_ADMIN, Job: BI_TCO_ACTIVATION

BEx Web reports

Can save to KM but not open (Ehp1 SP04)

BEx Workbook

User w/o Auth to change, can change

No fix

Excel BPS layout issues:

Note 574240 Certificates in Microsoft Excel

Note 428092 Additional function in Manual Planning

Note 176642 Simultaneous editing several Office documents

40

[


41/61


[ Ehp1 Upgrade Issues (cont.) BEx Web iViews Delta links

Links to BI Web Applications do not work in FPN

FPN (Federated Portal Network)

NW BI Java 7.01 SP02 PL0

Customer message, SAP provided Java patch to 7.01 SP02 PL1

Note 1245015 BEx Web 70 + FPN Scenario: NullPointer after patch

16/30 EP (Portal) Ehp1

Upgrade could not use Enhancement Installer

Due to distributed environment with high availability

Used JSPM instead

Ehp installer on Dual Stack (same SID / System #)

Error if app server has only ABAP stack (no Java)

SAP supplied fix, be sure to test in QA

41

[


42/61


[

42

BPC Installation – System Landscape

Five instance landscape:Test

Sandbox

Development

QA

Production

[


43/61


[

43

BPC Installation Steps

NW 7.0 BPC NW SP01

Install prerequisite software on .NET server & MSMQ

Install ABAP Server Component (Tran SAINT)

Configure ABAP Server (see appendix for detail steps)

Install .NET server component (9 steps, see install guide)

Configure .NET server component (6 steps, see install guide)

Set up Initial Application Set

Install Client Components

Note: Many manual steps.

[


44/61


[

44

BPC Installation Tips / Issues

Tips

Need .NET server, Basis & BW resources Verify correct security roles for content activation

Issues

CUA issues with service IDs

Incorrect end user security during content activation SAP needed to log onto system & delete entries

Now automated program to delete APSHELL & start again

.NET server performance

Note 1000057 - Patches for SAP Connector for Microsoft .NET2.0.1

Early Installation guides were incomplete

[


45/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project





Key Learnings


45

[


46/61


[

46

Key Differences: BPC NW and Microsoft

NW Lifecycle Management (Transports)

Have to transport the whole AppSet

Ability to import transactional data directly from BW

Ability to leverage BW backend transactions

LISTCUBE, RSA1, LISTSCHEMA, SM37, SM51, SE16

Use of custom process chains for execution of logic Similar to SQL SSIS packages

Currently no Business Process Flows in NW

Smaller library of script logic keywords in NW version

Ability to use BAdi‟s for custom logic

[


47/61


[ Key Differences: BPC & BW – Namespaces

47

Object Description Namespace

Static DDIC Transactions, classes, programs, tables, dataelements, message classes, etc.

UJ*

Generated DDIC Tables generated at runtime/1CPMB/DM* - Data Manager

/1CPMB/*

BW Objects Generated technical namesIe. InfoCubes, InfoObejcts, etc

/CPMB/*

BW Object tables Generated tables from BW objectsInfoCube Fact & Dim tables,InfoObject SID, Attribute, etc tables,Etc.

/B28/*

[


48/61


[ Key Differences: BPC & BW – Namespaces (cont.)

48

Object Format Name Example

AppSet /CPMB/ AppShell /CPMB/APSHELL

MultiProvider /CPMB/M PLANNING /CPMB/ATMKOOE

InfoCube /CPMB/I PLANNING /CPMB/ATIKOOY

InfoObject /CPMB/ Category /CPMB/ATDOHBU

Cube Tables Fact: /B28/F & /B28/EDim: /B28/DP or

PLANNING /B28/FATIKOOY/B28/DATIKOOY2

InfoObject /B28/ Category /B28/SATDOHBU

[


49/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project





Key Learnings


49

[


50/61


[

50

Key Learnings

Ramp-Up adds additional challenges & Time to your project

Time lines, Functionality gaps,

SAP & BPC consultants and SAP Coach critical

BPC is not fully integrated with NW BW data

No direct Master Data load from BW

Transactional data requires multiple loads

Operational planning in an Account-based planning system

Fitting multiple key figures into one can be challenging

Data duplication and high cube record volume

Complexity in ensuring all the data lines up as needed

BPC NW is not identical to SAP BPC 7.0 for Microsoft Some functionality, script keywords not included in the NW version

[


51/61


[

51

Key Learnings (cont)

BPC Reporting capabilities highly dependent on data model

Changing model down the road is not easy. Solution success highly dependent on detailed upfront reporting

requirements

Not just what to report on, but how to report

BPC 7.0 for NW, requires .NET expertise in addition to NW & BW

Requires some IT involvement Install, upgrades, custom process chains, transports

Corporate-level planning application with integration to SAP BW data

Management and development of the application / data model can becomplex

Shift from traditional SAP model of IS roles & responsibilities

EHP1 upgrade complexity

A project unto itself that could impact your enterprise BW

[ A d


52/61


[ Agenda

Introduction

Planning Project





Key Learnings


52

[ A d BPC Ad


53/61


[

53

Appendix: BPC Administration

Component DescriptionDimension Library(BW Characteristic InfoObjects)

16 DimensionsNo Dimension member formulas

Applications (BW Cubes) 6 (3 in active Use)1.8 Million & 3.9 Million rows

Work Status Not in ScopeScript Logic Used in Test Instance, Production (SP02)

FX Translation From LOCAL to USD/CAD

Journals Not in scope

Security 72 Users, 4 teams, 4 task profiles, 3

member access profiles

[ A di BPC F i l S BPC Offi


54/61


[

54

Appendix: BPC Functional Scope - BPC Office

Module Component Description

BPC Excel Input Schedules • 3

BPC Excel Custom Reports • ~ 5 – 7 + ad-hoc• One complex with VB

BPC Excel Park-N-Go •Yes

BPC Excel Data Manager – Master Data • Flat Files• Maintain Dimensions

BPC Excel Data Manager – Transaction Data • Loads from BW InfoProvider• Loads from Flat file•15 Transformation Files•5 Conversion Files

BPC Word • Not in scope

BPC PowerPoint • Not In Scope

BPC Web Live Reporting • Not In Scope

[ A di BPC F i l S O h


55/61


[

55

Appendix: BPC Functional Scope - Other

Module Component Description

BPC Custom Custom Logic in SAP BPC NW

Using a Business Add-In (BAdI)

•Not tested, future

BPC Custom Open Hub & InfoSpoke • Not tested, future.

BW PC Process Chains • Delivered PC• Custom PC to run script logicfrom BPC client.

BW-BPS Fox Formulas • 9 Allocations

BW-BEx BEx Analyzer Query • One End User Report•Create File for ECC load

BW-BWA (BIA) In production, BW cubes loaded • Not used for BPC cubes

BW-ABAP Custom ABAP • Close Real-Time Cube Request

BW-CTS Transports •Transport AppSet to production

[ A di BPC NW T bl


56/61


[ Appendix: BPC NW - Tables

56

Table Description

UJF_DOC BPC File Service Document Master Table

UJF_DOCMAP BPC File Service Document Directory Path Mapping

UJF_DOCTREE BPC File Service Document Tree Table

UJT_TRANS_CHG BPC Transports - Object Changeability Table

UJA_SVR_DEFAULT BPC: Server Defaults

UJE_* BPC Security tables (teams, profiles, users)

[ A di BPC NW T i


57/61


[ Appendix: BPC NW - Transactions

57

Table Description

UJ00 BPC Configuration

UJBPCTR BPC Transports - Create Request

UJFS BPC File Service

UJQ0 Query Runtime Parameters

UJR0 Write back Runtime Parameters

UJSTAT BPC Performance Statistics Report

UJUT_DATA Unit Test Data Maintain

UJ_VALIDATION BPC Validations Maintenance

[ A di BPC I t ll ti D t il


58/61


[

58

Appendix: BPC Installation Details Configure ABAP Server (In each NW-BW instance):

ABAP buffer size to at least 2GB

1. Set /CPMB/ namespace modifiable, CPMBPC software component„Restricted Modifiability‟

2. Set /B28/ namespace to modifiable.

3. Create 3 BPC service user ID‟s & assign BPC roles.

4. ALEREMOTE user configured with profile S_BI-WHM-FC

5. Tran RSTPRFC – RFC destination for After Import method6. Tran SM59 Connection test on RFC dest MDS_PARSER

7. Assign auth to activate business content to role

8. Assign S_RS_ALL to BPC_SYSADMIN user

1. Also to user doing content activation

9. Create entries in BPC transports table UJT_TRANS_CHG.

10. Install ApShell – Program UJS_ACTIVATE_CONTENT

11. Define .NET service users to log on to ApShell

12. .NET virtualization is supported

[ Li k


59/61


[ Links

SAP Ehp1 for NW 7.0 Support Package Stackshttps://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442

BPC How-To Guideshttps://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/x/zb4

Installation, Master, Configuration, Operations Guideshttp://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpc --> 7.0 Version for SAP Netweaver

Security Guide

http://service.sap.com/securityguide --> SAP Business User

59

[ X`

https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/x/zb4http://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpchttp://service.sap.com/securityguidehttp://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpchttp://service.sap.com/securityguidehttp://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpchttp://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpchttp://service.sap.com/instguidescpm-bpchttps://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/x/zb4https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000714442


60/61


[

60

X

[

] Thank you for participating.

SESSION CODE: 307

Please remember to complete and return your

evaluation form following this session.

For ongoing education on this area of focus, visit the Year-Round

Community page at www.asug.com/yrc

[


61/61

[

Trusted Strategies. Better Results.

1,200 projected attendees

+ more than 100 sessions

= endless opportunities for learning

www.gbnannualconference.org

Registration

opens in May

Documents

SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation 7.0 Version